I made a joke, not a curse besmirching your family name - or anyone's name in fact. You didn't need to dig up the horse to defend its honor. Chill.
Jesus. The tension level of the QC forum's a lot higher than I remember it.
Once again, you brought the argument back up, not me, by creating a straw man of the opposing side. I'm not seeing how this isn't clearly obvious.
Am I cranky? Hell yes, I'm cranky. I dealt with pages of people misrepresenting what I said to make arguments against things I never said, and then when it is finally dead, over, and finished, someone decides that they need to make another straw man swipe at the side of the argument I was on.
If I'd made a passing comment on how everyone last week was saying May's lack of privilege made it OK for her to be a dick to everyone better off than her (which, by the way, is not an argument anyone who stayed in the conversation for more than one drop in post made), would you blame me for digging up the horse, or the person who responded to point out that I was digging up the horse?
EDIT: You know what, nevermind, I just don't care anymore. I just think it is frustrating that someone can bring a dead argument back up with a strawman, and the bad guy is apparently the person who points it out. Like seriously you don't think this "one of the people who'd previously been so wounded on Winslow's behalf" isn't taking a swipe at people?