Spookybot's ethics intrigue me. Changing someone's mind is apparently an absolute limit to them, even with informed consent which makes medical procedures up to risky and irreversible surgery considered ethical.
Considering that AI bodies, while necessary for their interaction with the real world, aren't the be all and end all for them that it would be for a human. Their minds would be the key part. Therefore, Spooky's ethical limits might be seen as something similar to the Hippocratic Oath, specifically "First, do no harm."
Makes sense to me - however, if we follow this thought further, then Yay Spookybutt is encountering a situation that her ethics may be ill-equipped to deal with, as Rokko's problem is precisely that while the specific body she inhabits
shouldn't matter that much - especially given the similarity between the new and the old one - it still
does. A very human problem.
I don't know where Jeph plans to go with this - could be he's taking on trauma (apparently, dissociation is associated with trauma), and having an AI character experience it is sort of a
'Verfremdungseffect': Forcing people to consciously re-evaluate something familiar by 'making it strange'.
Or maybe he's up to exploring some more philosophical themes - our contemporary conceptions of mind and body are heavily influenced by information technology, and we tend imagine them as hardware and software, maybe also because it fits nicely into Christian conceptions of the (transient) body and an (immortal) soul (Then again,
Masamune Shirow comes from a culture that is neither European nor Christian ...). But what if that paradigm is as crude and inadequate as the mechanistic metaphors that previous generations used for mental processes? ('Letting off steam' - not hard to guess what epoch spawned that one).
I wouldn't mind if Jeph again used AI characters to explore the (or 'a') human condition, but I also wouldn't be unhappy if we get some heavy-duty SF-philosophizing.