My frank impression is that we're dealing with a 15 year old troll, who thinks contorting grammar, using $50 words, and neologisms are good ways of convincing people of their intelligence.
Besides that statement being unfair to 15 year olds---according to my data, one's intelligence peaks near that age--I often grammatically contort or nonce only for my message's simplifaction or elegation. (As for the expense of my vocabulary, each member was gratis. You'd have to be an idiot to pay for a piece of data that, properly, is of our common heritage.)
Verbogeny is one of many pleasurettes afforded a creatific thinkerizer.
Any question to elucidate on their, candidly, cryptic communications - both posts and private messages - goes unanswered.
I'd like to elucidate that, to day, I've gotten only one private message from Cornelius; that message contained only a generic question about the literary-stylistic ability of it's primary audience.
What's more, they seem to have absolutely no inclination to enter into any kind of debate, as I have not seen them answer any question directed to them in any thread.
Our earliest here post was nigh month syne. Expect you that any can so easily: describe one's thoughts composed responding to an arbitrary? Due to the ongoing public health emergency of international concern, We have been freer to ponder (usual stimuli's decrease compelling towards, of such, greater attendence) for leisure. The tractile interest of that to which this is response has us here. But to such as were, by you, mentioned, response would be irresponsible.
Great debate is of our favourite stimulants. This your post, of your posts toward us, seems the first towards good debate. It may be apt to have these about this moved elsewhere. (e.g. a thread in ``DISCUSS;'' Such here probably would be inappropriate.) We wish you would have sooner expressed that at least as well as you here had.
We're curious about your knowledge of our plurality.