Fun Stuff > CLIKC
Smash Brothers Brawl
just-another-andy:
SBB is still not out here in the uk! we've been waiting forever, taunted by threads like this for months.
will: wanton sex god:
--- Quote from: LordNagash on 11 Apr 2008, 23:47 ---If playing with a defensive strategy is what is good in brawl, why not use that? It just sounds like these 'competitive' players are complaining because the strategy they want to use is no longer the best. How is this not the case? Is there perhaps an argument I could read somewhere?
--- End quote ---
Thats exactly what i feel Jedi's arguments have boiled down to. I'm not saying that's how he feels, but thats how it's coming across.
JediBendu:
--- Quote from: Storm Rider on 11 Apr 2008, 10:39 ---So your opinion is essentially "I don't like this game and if you disagree you're not good enough at it?"
Good for you, I guess?
--- End quote ---
Actually not at all, if you like the game that's fine. But the problem for more competitive players is definitely there whether you disagree or not. And if anyone is going to say that the problem some people have is not legitimate, then I would say you're just not playing with the same mindset or on the same level as those who have the problem. If you like the game that's fine too, but we have our opinion too and if anyone is to try and say, "well I don't think what you think is based on is even true" then I would say "Well, play like us."
My opinion of you though, is that I'm expressing my opinion respectfully and you're just too stupid too understand. So. Good for you, I suppose.
And to everyone else, it's not that the "strategy" has changed, it's just that ATTACK and DEFENSE are now unbalanced. It shouldn't be like that. Both should have merits. Of course there can always be players whose strategy is to play more defensively, and it's not like competitive playing in Melee was about "attack attack attack," (again, don't say anything about a community if you don't know anything about it) but in any game the player who is being attacked should not be given unbalanced advantages over the attacker.
And Cartilage Head, though I'm not saying that I'm being "uppity" why is it better to get "uppity" about a technical game? Does that justify being "uppity?" and again, how am I being as such? Is me not liking a game and explaining why in a reasonable way (though, being flamed, of course) now cause for alarm? Perhaps your perceptions are slightly askew.
I'm not very uppity honestly, I'm just expressing my legitimate opinion about a game I enjoy, and am being attacked by morons who having nothing better to do than insult me and not say anything to back up their own opinions in the least (well really just Storm Rider) and I have no respect for that whatsoever.
Storm Rider:
Oooh, aren't you a big man, calling people stupid on the Internet. I'll have to somehow live with the crushing knowledge of your disapproval.
Cartilage Head:
Internet tough-guy.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version