Fun Stuff > BAND
Battle of the bands
Kai:
20 bucks says he puts up Bruce Dickinson.
E. Spaceman:
I suggest we just add our names instead of the time and name, it just makes for awkward reading.
I am enjoying this first round, but when it comes to choosing in later rounds it's gonna be really hard.
Garcin:
I prefer the signature/date stamp method because it's going to make vandalism easier to detect. Anyone else want to voice an opinion?
EDIT: Also trends (someone suggesting something and then a bunch of people rapidly agreeing) are going to be easier to detect, and one of the reasons I find this process fascinating is the trends that I am anticipating.
OpenJamie:
The wiki page is a fantastic idea espeically as with regards to coming up with the 64 bands to enter which I was worring about.
One suggestion though is that from maybe the third round change the system to instead of the big group with one vote make match ups between individual bands with the winner going through.
This adds interest and allows people to vote for more than one band possibably leading to more thought. Most people could say who their favourite band is but deciding between two bands you like but perhaps dont love is a more interesting decision in my opinion.
Thoughts?
Slick:
I'll second the time stamp, I think it's a good idea. Plus, yeah, watching trends.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version