Fun Stuff > BAND
Battle of the bands
OpenJamie:
--- Quote from: tommydski ---there is a problem with this system.
i put up fugazi because i want them to win and i don't think there is a band that can stand up to them.
i like sleater-kinney and the velvet undergound but i'm not voting for them because i want fugazi to win.
see the problem?
--- End quote ---
The matchplay system will also counter this problem
Mnementh:
I changed the formatting a little bit, It takes up more space but should make it easier to tally.
Garcin:
Looks much better, Mnementh. It's going to be a looooong ass page when the week is done.
--- Quote from: tommydski ---there is a problem with this system.
i put up fugazi because i want them to win and i don't think there is a band that can stand up to them.
i like sleater-kinney and the velvet undergound but i'm not voting for them because i want fugazi to win.
see the problem?
--- End quote ---
Actually this is the way I wanted it to work. If everyone votes in the first round for every band that they like then it's just going to be a straight popularity contest with the winner apparent from the outset. But this way, it won't happen. For example, I want Sleater-Kinney to win, but also like VU and Fugazi. If SK gets eliminated in the 3d round, I'm going to probably start voting for VU or Fugazi.
--- Quote from: OpenJamie ---The wiki page is a fantastic idea espeically as with regards to coming up with the 64 bands to enter which I was worring about.
One suggestion though is that from maybe the third round change the system to instead of the big group with one vote make match ups between individual bands with the winner going through.
This adds interest and allows people to vote for more than one band possibably leading to more thought. Most people could say who their favourite band is but deciding between two bands you like but perhaps dont love is a more interesting decision in my opinion.
Thoughts?
--- End quote ---
I toyed with the idea and ultimately felt that it would be more trouble than it was worth.
Advantages: As you mentioned forces people to make difficult choice. Also adds dynamism to the process, so that an early favorite doesn't take control in the first round and then stay at the top in every subsequent round.
Disadvantages: (1) More admin work, and I would this process to be as community run as possible; (2) We'd have to decide on a way to determine the match-ups, which would be probably controversial; (3) People are going to be forced to make difficult decisions anyway since all their favorites are going to, in many cases, get eliminated; (4) People who are choosing between two bands they don't know will most likely not make an informed choice, rather than go and listen to the bands.
So I think the negatives probably outweight the positives. Maybe this is something that we could try in a subsequent effort, after we iron the wrinkles out with this one?
Thoughts, people?
OpenJamie:
The Admin wouldnt be that hard you could use the wiki page and just ask people to put a mark next to band/artist they want to vote for. At the end of the week you simply put the ones who have the most into their next match.
The easiest way to detemin the initial matchups would be to have the bands with the most votes as seeds.
I have loads of time from nexts thursday, end of exams so i wouldnt mind doing most of the admin but if you would rather have a more established member of the forum do it thats cool.
Storm Rider:
I added a bunch, but we're still only at 41 at last count.
I had a bit of a technicality: Arjen Anthony Lucassen does all the writing and most of the instruments (guitar, bass, keyboards) for several bands, most prominently the two I mentioned, so I didn't feel it was necessary to list them seperately as he's basically the only permanent member of most of his projects. I hope that's OK with you Moiche. (It's not like he's getting farther than at best the second round anyway.)
Also, I'm kind of a noob to wiki editing, is there a way to just post a timestamp afterwards? Currently I'm just editing the page and copy/pasting the timestamp after looking in the history.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version