Originality is impossible. No one should be making music anymore by this logic. There is a pre-cursor for everything.
I agree. This hopefully not very wide-spread search for uniqueness is doomed to fail. Nowadays when I hear something I haven't heard before, I don't assume it is original(although it perhaps is to me), but that I simply haven't heard that particular artist's influences. There is an apt quote about rock'n'roll from one of the guys in Comets on Fire that goes(slightly shortened):
"Everyone wants to be something brand new, like you go up to a cave and get your God-given instruction on how to make incredible new, original music... Fuck that. Each of our musical accomplishments and the new ground that we can break comes from a musical gift from those who have come before us."So I don't think it is automatically a bad thing to seek inspiration from the 70's or the 60's. The problem arises when you do little or nothing with that inspiration e.g. that your band is crap as Inlander said. As always you have dig a little to find the good stuff and there is quite a large community dedicated to this stuff. Hell even Denmark has this sort of thing with bands like Baby Woodrose and Causa Sui.
To be honest I think rock'n'roll is sprawling these years and there is a lot of quality out there. I really like the course hardcore has taken, meshing with metal and other things, becoming better in the process. To me at least. Bands like Kylesa, La Quiete and Amanda Woodward have made near-masterpieces. This pollination of different textures is fantastic in my book, I mean even Xasthur could be described as psychedelic. If you want more straight rock'n'roll there is Black Lips, Jay Reatard and The Legendary Shack Shakers. I think that all these different styles make all sorts of mixes and combinations possible. That to me is what progress is made of. I don't know if that makes the 00's special(probably not) but it does make them quite exciting to me.