Fun Stuff > ENJOY
Terrible Movies Thread
frunK:
The reason I thought 300 sucked balls is because I was expecting a huge fight scene involving a fat-ass with sword hands but he was in it for only three fucking seconds.
This will not be forgiven.
EVER.
Narr:
300 is a movie based on a Frank Miller comic. People going in to it expecting something other than a Frank Miller comic brought to life didn't get what they came for. People expecting over-the-top action with cheesy lines got exactly what they wanted.
That said, I enjoyed it.
Ikrik:
--- Quote from: pinkpiche on 07 Apr 2008, 14:50 ---
--- Quote from: Ikrik on 06 Apr 2008, 18:43 ---
--- Quote from: Aminal on 06 Apr 2008, 15:21 ---
--- Quote from: Ikrik on 05 Apr 2008, 22:56 --- but then they threw in that whole storyarc with his wife that just absolutely ruined anything resembling entertainment.
--- End quote ---
How come you think that? I'm not starting a fight, I'm just curious. My main issue with that movie was the abundance of scary nipples.
--- End quote ---
the 300 graphic novel was all about the actually fighting. It was great and had some amazing action scenes, and the story stays mostly true to that. The difference between the men in the graphic novel and in the movie is that in the graphic novel the people actually look Greek, not white. For the movie they decided to add in the arc with the wife and it just came out as tacky and useless.....and really, really predictable.
I guess I hated it the most because I was expecting Sin City but with Spartans.....but man.....it sucked.
--- End quote ---
What? You didn't like the movie because the actors' hue of skin was slightly different from what it was in a comicbook? I've heard some bad reasons for not liking a movie like "I noticed a lot of clipping, which suggests bad takes" or "In my imagination Shrek's voice was slightly shriller" but what the hell?
--- End quote ---
What? What I said is that the only difference between the graphic novel and the movie (in the fighting sense) was that the men looked more european. That's not why I didn't enjoy the movie. I didn't enjoy the movie because they tacked on a terrible subplot with his wife that was both 1. predictable and 2. completely useless.
tania:
me and my friend ian both finished a bunch of exams today so we decided to go watch 10,000 bc. we already knew it would be terrible from the start, having looked up the ridiculuously stupid plot in advance, and went into the threatre intending to watch it as a comedy. i don't know what i was expecting but oh my god. this film was so bad. i don't even know where to begin. by the end we couldn't even laugh anymore, we could only sit there in the theatre shaking our heads. stupid plot, no character development whatsoever, ridiculous chauvinism, and everyone somehow has well-groomed faces and legs yet can't cut their fucking hair. we pretty much felt like the film was making fun of us tbh. my advice to you is that if you think this film will be hilarious, even in an ironic sense, i promise it won't be. it's just fucking awful on every level. please save your money and don't ever see it.
RobbieOC:
Here's an interesting article about this kind of thing:
http://film.guardian.co.uk/features/featurepages/0,,2267064,00.html
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version