There are now at least five imitations of the original "Body Worlds" exhibitions. That's five exhibitions, that are not "Bodies" that obtained their bodies from more reputable sources.
Surely, if the other five exhibitions were able to obtain bodies from volunteers and/or donations, the bodies used in "Bodies" could just as easily have come from similar, reputable locations? I have to draw the conclusion that they were simply the cheapest bodies available. I am usually in favour of spending as little money as possible, but these bodies belonged to real people. If you buy dead bodies from questionable sources for the sake of saving money, people are going to question your morality and your motive.
Given the number of copy cats and the availability of bodies from reputable sources, I have to draw the conclusion that people like Arnie Geller are in this entirely for monetary gain.
I'm rather uncomfortable with the idea of dead bodies on display like this in such a manner. However, I appreciate that Gunther Von Hagens is a genuine eccentric and do not doubt his sincerity when he says that the Body Worlds are for educational purposes. Arnie Geller, however, I believe is not such a person, due the to publicity he strives for and the business surrounding the origin of the bodies used. I have to assume that the sole motivation for "Bodies" is profit. I have no interest in supporting people that operate like that.
Outside of a few interviews where the man tries to defend the exhibition, I haven't been able to find anything to suggest otherwise. While I feel uncomfortable with the idea of bodies on display, I would probably pay to see Body Worlds due to my morbid curiousity. I would not, however, support Bodies, where the bodies on display are potentially murder victims.