Fun Stuff > CHATTER

Do u liek boobs????

<< < (56/88) > >>

Nodaisho:

--- Quote from: Chrasstor on 04 Apr 2008, 20:01 ---You clearly aren't Jeph, if he has a problem he'll say so directly... I'm pretty sure he's not ascared of his internet lackies.
--- End quote ---

I don't know, I think his relationship with the WCT forum is pretty close to Frankenstein and his monster right now.


--- Quote ---But pretty lanky girls around a 5'9" who can look me in the eye are great.
--- End quote ---
This.


--- Quote ---This aint the paleolithic era for Christ sake, you don't need to dominate and defend women. I'm perplexed as to why it's still taboo.
--- End quote ---
Even if you did have to still, I know a 5' 0" guy that I don't think would have any problem beating the shit out of most anybody.

sean:
I don't know about you guys but I can't wait till Jeph reads this thread.

Darkbluerabbit:
I fully expected mockery when I posted that.  I found it amusing and though someone else might also.

The only point I will contest is that I said "guy I've been seeing" and it somehow translated to "boyfriend."

There's a BIG difference, guys.  (Whole new can of worms there...woops.)

axerton:
Gah, I can't stand people who insist on differentiating between "guy I'm seeing" and "boyfriend". what the fuck difference does it make?

CardinalFang:

--- Quote from: Chrasstor on 04 Apr 2008, 20:01 ---
Well, QC is a society... I don't get your point. I don't recall him mentioning 'the world' as his topic.

--- End quote ---

I don't recall him mentioning QC either.

His reply certainly does mention the world though doesn't it?


--- Quote from: Slick on 04 Apr 2008, 13:09 ---
Man, I was just trying to drum up some possible rationale behind what was said. Also, QC is a very small part of the world indeed, but in principle every little bit counts. It's bad to stop thinking about the significance of little things. Of course it's not going to change the world, but little people do make up the world.

--- End quote ---

Come to think of it I never mentioned the world either did I?



--- Quote from: Chrasstor on 04 Apr 2008, 20:01 ---Also, why do you care? You clearly aren't Jeph, if he has a problem he'll say so directly... I'm pretty sure he's not ascared of his internet lackies.

--- End quote ---

I'm clearly not Jeph? Is it me or Jeph that you're watching post on the internet? After all no one in the history of the internet as ever had more than one account on a forum.
No, I'm not Jeph, you are at least correct in that. As to why  I might care, take a look at the Fossilization section of the forums. Similar forums have been closed in the past due to the behavior of some posters. There's no guarantee that another one will be started.


--- Quote from: Chrasstor on 04 Apr 2008, 20:01 --- Sorry if I sound dickish, but it seems like you're just being irrationally prudent. Who cares if we have a thread about boobs. There's been a lot of threads like this in the past, I'm sure.

--- End quote ---

Yes, you are sounding dickish however it is the internet and therefore not surprising.
Could you please point out where I've been irrationally prudish (I'll assume you meant prudish instead of prudent please correct me if I'm wrong). Or even rationally prudish.  Have I called for the thread to be locked? Deleted? Have I taken anyone to task for their language? Help me out here.

You seem to have missed the points of my posts. More than likely I am not communicating it well. Let me try again.
I originally posted in response to a post of ephemere's. Not because I wanted the thread locked but because to me it sounded as if she were characterizing other posters who had expressed concern about the thread as denying sex exists. I felt that I was misunderstanding her since she doesn't seem to be the type to make such an assertion and asked for clarification.

Slick responded with his comment regarding the locking of the thread being a step back in society. I thought that was a bit of hyperbole and responded.

ephemere's and slick's posts seemed designed more to silence critics by characterizing them as denying sex exists or by threatening society as a whole.
I don't really believe that ephemere or slick meant their posts in such a manner and I asked for clarification. As I mentioned I should've taken it to PM in the first place and none of this would've happened. I have learned my lesson.

My apologies for further derailing this thread.



--- Quote from: Chrasstor on 04 Apr 2008, 20:01 ---Stupid beer!

--- End quote ---



tl;dr  - Boobs are GREAT!

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version