As much as I disagree with this HHS initiative and the ideology behind it, the Huffington Post blog has once again willfully exaggerated a bad idea to make it seem much worse. This
LA Times article gives a much more nuanced and accurate analysis of what appears to be a
draft regulation on the part of the HHS.
(1) This is a
draft regulation that was probably intentionally leaked to gauge public outrage should the regulation actually be passed. So public outrage across the US, especially in states where Republican incumbents are facing strong Democratic challengers would be a very good thing.
(2) The regulation would forbid federal funds to organizations that did not promise not to fire workers who refused to provide
certain contraceptives which are thought to end pregnancy after fertilization of the egg but before implantation of the embryo. Got that? No? Me neither. But this is not about a bunch of fundies saying "No more condoms". It's a little more subtle than that.
I find the HHS initiative abhorrent, I don't think that blogs like this one do justice to those who would defend reproductive choice. Just look at the posts in this thread that completely miss the fucking point. If all this outrage were guided by an intelligent understanding of the issues...
P.S. *Misconception*, heh heh