I love ladies and all, but Scarelett Johansson is just not hot. She pushes her boobs up way to much and they always look like they are dying. That's not hot.
Oh huh, I guess the main thing about her is if she is hot or not? Interesting!
Crazy! I didn't know that being a feminist meant I wasn't allowed to find other women attractive. Interesting, indeed. Maybe I just meant "Hey guys, I know you all find her attractive and whatnot, but I do not."
Plus, reading interviews with her makes me gag. I believe there was an interview with her in Rolling Stone a bit ago, when she released that Tom Waits album. She just seemed so full of herself.
Yeah, women in the media are dumb by default right?
What? What? Where do you even get that out of what I said? I never said she was dumb. I said she was full of herself. But you know, calling one woman full of herself automatically means that all women in media are dumb.
If she would let her boobs be normal, and not try to kill them with very ill fitting clothing, I would probably at least think she is hot. But the fact that she isn't Scarlett Johansson, as much as Scarlett Johansson's boobs really bothers me. I just tire of seeing her engorged tits.
If she dressed more to you liking, you would forget that she is "not hot" (apparently it matters) and stupid enough to "make (you) gag"?
Once again, where did I call her dumb? And yes, if she didn't seem to make her tits be the only reason we should pay attention to her, I'd probably like her more. I can't stand the "HERE ARE MY BOOBS! IS MY SHIRT TIGHT ENOUGH?? I CAN'T BREATHE. MY CHEST FEELS LIKE IT IS GOING TO EXPLODE" look.
And why am I being attacked for saying whether or not she is hot? Because I am a girl? Guys in this thread are saying it as well. But thats ok though, because they are men, and are allowed to only think with their sexual organs, whereas women should just be glad to have any man so much as look at her. Seriously, why am I not allowed to talk about whether or not someone is attractive?
I'd rather not have women viewed solely as sex objects.
That's interesting that you skipped all of my posts in this thread. Plus most other people's.
What?
I'm sorry, am I only allowed to form opinions based on what is being said on this board? Or is it in this thread strictly? Five people saying "Gee, Scarlett Johansson is a great actress, and a pretty good singer." doesn't outweigh the millions who careless of her acting career and more about her body.
I mean, if it weren't for her boobs, would we even be having this discussion? It's pisses me off that people care more about her tits than her.
Again, interesting. Let's have a look at earlier posts again -
She pushes her boobs up way to much and they always look like they are dying.
This was literally the first mention of her breasts in this thread. By you.
Just because I was the first to say it here doesn't mean I was the first to say it period. Typically, that is what discussions of her are centered on.
If she would let her boobs be normal, and not try to kill them with very ill fitting clothing, I would probably at least think she is hot.
So breasts are the deal breaker of whether a girl is "hot", huh? Interesting!
Hey, Tommy, how often do you just read into things? Often? I would say so based on just this one post!
If she would wear clothes that fit, not clothes that are too tight, I wouldn't have a problem with her. Plenty of other "hot" actresses do this. Do you see me complaining about them?
Does nybody remember that picture of her floating around the internet of her in that yellow dress?
You do.
I am not really sure of the need to comment on this. Maybe you can explain it better.
I just tire of seeing her engorged tits.
Wow, you're really on message about her breasts, aren't you?
Sorry, I spoke my opinion on something as trivial as some actress. I will be sure to keep shut about such things from now on. Anything else you'd rather I not speak up about? Anything else I should hide my feelings about? What else is my opinion wrong about?
I'm really quite outraged by the implication that this forum (and by association, me) must see her as a 'sex object'. Let's actually look at what I posted in this thread -
To be fair, she has a job and lifestyle that pretty much means she is expected to look a particular way and probably involves a lot of media types blowing smoke up her ass all day.
I don't blame her complicity because frankly, women have a limited amount of time to make serious money in the film industry. Sad but true.
So, that's a reference to the fact that she is expected to look a certain way to get a job in her chosen career path because women have a limited amount of time to have any real draw in the box office. Notice, no mention about her "engorged tits" or any reference to her as a "sex object" beyond identifying the sad truth that women are often judged on their appearance.
Rest assured if ScarJo was stood next to you in neutral lighting without a ton of face-cake, she'd look pretty good. You just have to look through all the trimmings to see a regular human being.
I can't think of any way to put that. It's an appeal to see a successful woman as a human being and not as her job or her looks.
Your personal opinion is fine but please don't throw around the word Feminist like that. It does nobody any good.
Hey, Tommy, do you remember when I accused you of treating her as a sex object? Do you? I don't. I remember saying that I dislike seeing women treated as such. Point out where I directly accused you of doing so, please.
Also, if it's because of her job that she has to dress so poorly, why not do something to change it? I am certain she has enough money/friends in high places that she could start a production company, and actually do something about how the world views Hollywood. Sure, it won't happen over night. But at least she(and other actresses) won't have to flash people to get good roles.
