THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 21 Jun 2025, 07:30
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Down

Author Topic: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani  (Read 40321 times)

Nodaisho

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,658
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #50 on: 08 Dec 2008, 21:14 »

Fig. 4: Doug Martsch, Built to Spill
He and Neil Fallon need to have a beard contest.

I like some dream theatre, maybe I only hear the best songs or something. I guess I just have a lower standard for what I find engaging, like I said earlier, I find Day engaging.
Logged
I took a duck in the face at two hundred and fifty knots

Dimmukane

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,683
  • juicer
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #51 on: 08 Dec 2008, 21:15 »

It is relatively simple but very well executed, managing to deliver about ten times more feeling with the subtle nuances of the guitar than Coldplay did with their vocals.

Ten times zero is still zero.
Logged
Quote from: Johnny C
all clothes reflect identity constructs, destroy these constructs by shedding your clothes and sending pictures of the process to the e-mail address linked under my avatar

Spluff

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,410
  • it is time to party
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #52 on: 08 Dec 2008, 21:17 »

Man, you can't tell me that If I Could Fly contains no emotion. You just can't.
Logged
[16:27] Ozy:  has joined the room
[16:27] Quietus: porn necklace!
[16:27] Quietus: Shove it up yer vag!
[16:27] Ozy: has left the room

KickThatBathProf

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,973
  • hey there
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #53 on: 08 Dec 2008, 21:23 »

(Hint:  He already did.)
Logged
dumplings are the answer because the foreskin boys

Dimmukane

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,683
  • juicer
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #54 on: 08 Dec 2008, 21:27 »

That was a bit of an exaggeration, but it's barely got anything I can feel at all.  It came across (as well as most of G3's music) as the kind of light jazz/yacht rock/muzak you'd hear whilst shopping in Kohl's or someplace similar.  I also do not much care for his guitar tone.  If a good stoner riff is crunchy, then this is fried and greasy.
Logged
Quote from: Johnny C
all clothes reflect identity constructs, destroy these constructs by shedding your clothes and sending pictures of the process to the e-mail address linked under my avatar

Spluff

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,410
  • it is time to party
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #55 on: 08 Dec 2008, 21:31 »

Logged
[16:27] Ozy:  has joined the room
[16:27] Quietus: porn necklace!
[16:27] Quietus: Shove it up yer vag!
[16:27] Ozy: has left the room

RedLion

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,691
Re: pretention!!
« Reply #56 on: 08 Dec 2008, 21:32 »

Fuck that. I mean, everyone has different preferences, music is subjective, etc., etc., but some of you guys can be incredibly pretentious and haughty. I don't like Coldplay because I don't like the way it sounds or their lyrics. But I would never say that they "don't have emotion." Of course they do! If a person writes a song, no matter how cheesy and cruddy it is, it has emotion in it! If you don't like guitar wankery that's totally cool. But don't be pricks about it, and don't try to make your subjective statements into factual ones (If I Could Fly contains no emotion, to paraphrase.)

Because they predominantly listen to indie rock, which is about as far away as you can possibly get. Indie rock has people that can barely play their instruments, and that's the way they like it.

That and they've never actually heard any good instrumental guitar tracks.

I don't really believe that. I listen to Indie rock all the time. I also listen to "guitar wankers" quite a bit. I love both in equal measure. The people who don't like it just don't like it. And that's cool! That's their prerogative! However, they do not have to be assholes about it, and they unfortunately oftentimes are.
Logged
"Death is nothing, but to live defeated is to die daily."
 - Napoleon

Nodaisho

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,658
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #57 on: 08 Dec 2008, 21:34 »

That was a bit of an exaggeration, but it's barely got anything I can feel at all.  It came across (as well as most of G3's music) as the kind of light jazz/yacht rock/muzak you'd hear whilst shopping in Kohl's or someplace similar.  I also do not much care for his guitar tone.  If a good stoner riff is crunchy, then this is fried and greasy.
Disagree, I would say it is more roasted. Or baked, but baked isn't what I was thinking it was, and really sounds more fit to stoners anyways.
Logged
I took a duck in the face at two hundred and fifty knots

Spluff

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,410
  • it is time to party
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #58 on: 08 Dec 2008, 21:37 »

I suppose this just shows that different people have different amounts of empathy (probably not the right word) for guitar. I personally hear a whole lot of feeling in that song. And if you can't hear the feeling in guitar, there's probably no way you can enjoy music where guitar is the focal point of the composition.
Logged
[16:27] Ozy:  has joined the room
[16:27] Quietus: porn necklace!
[16:27] Quietus: Shove it up yer vag!
[16:27] Ozy: has left the room

MadassAlex

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,050
  • "Tasteful"?
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #59 on: 08 Dec 2008, 21:41 »

I'm really not seeing why the general opinion on this forum seems to be against the guitar wankery, for lack of a better term.

oh my GOD

I so fucking hope we have this thread again. Not even joking, last time was a blast.
Logged

Dimmukane

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,683
  • juicer
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #60 on: 08 Dec 2008, 21:42 »

Sorry.  I just felt a little goaded by the statement he made.  It was ridiculously untrue, so I was trying to play the other angle to point that out.



To be honest, I would say that that Coldplay song probably has more emotion than If I Could Fly.  But Coldplay doesn't hold a candle to Strange Beautiful Music.  So it balances out.

But yeah, that bit about indie rock not having any good guitarists was bound to piss some people off anyway.  I'd like pay to see a duel between Spencer Seim and Joe Satriani.


New post: I can hear the feeling in guitar just fine.  It's a subjective thing.
Logged
Quote from: Johnny C
all clothes reflect identity constructs, destroy these constructs by shedding your clothes and sending pictures of the process to the e-mail address linked under my avatar

MadassAlex

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,050
  • "Tasteful"?
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #61 on: 08 Dec 2008, 22:15 »

To be honest, I would say that that Coldplay song probably has more emotion than If I Could Fly.  But Coldplay doesn't hold a candle to Strange Beautiful Music.  So it balances out.

New post: I can hear the feeling in guitar just fine.
 

It's a subjective thing.

All this sounds kind of ridiculous. Claiming that you can hear emotion "just fine" and then say it's a subjective thing says either the blindingly obvious or that your perception of emotion is superior to someone else's. And this is not long after you've declared that one song has more emotion than other. I get what you're saying and agree, but this post as a whole is a tad silly.

Emotion comes from the listener, anyway. There's no magic way to transfer yourself over thin air, even though music tries, and in the end it depends on how the listener feels about the music.

It makes sense for an "indie" forum to reject, to a significant degree, instrumental rock. Indie, which I think can be reasonably defined as pop-influenced rock with hard rock elements (although this can never be entirely true, but most indie artists fall under this umbrella), is quite accessible. That accessibility is interpreted by many people here as a clear method of expressing the concept or narrative of any piece of music, and music that is stereotyped as insanely technical and complex becomes the antithesis of what they see as effective musical communication.

It all comes from a kind of musical set. As someone who grew up listening to a lot of instrumental classical music, I always felt that a treble voice, like the violin (or, indeed, the high strings of a guitar) carried more effective communication than the human voice, even without the ability to form words. As such, I was rather confused the first time told me that shredders played with no emotion and had no creativity. My expectations lead me to believe that they were the finest musicians that could expect to exist, as their instrumental prowess was so powerful and they used the instrument so effectively.

The last thread showed that there's no real way to argue against musical set. Pretty effectively.

Anyway, the point is that it's kind of uncool just to assume that shred music is utter shit like a whole lot of people do. Within this forum, outside, whatever. It's pretty ignorant and is a lot like saying "death metal is random blah-di-blah". If you don't like music, there is no real point in going out of your way to diss it (although I recognise that this thread is completely reasonable place to discuss such opinions and is the place it should be done) and if you are, it's a pretty cool thing to try and learn from the experience.

I guess the last few paragraphs weren't directed at anyone in particular. While a repeat of my shred thread from a while back would be fun, I think what has to be said on the issue is pretty clear - there are no absolutes in music. Defining whole other genres when you have minimal experience with them is generally a poor idea and it happens to shred a lot, which is pretty sad. 

But yeah, that bit about indie rock not having any good guitarists was bound to piss some people off anyway.  I'd like pay to see a duel between Spencer Seim and Joe Satriani.

A challenger appears!
Logged

michaelicious

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,574
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #62 on: 08 Dec 2008, 22:31 »

Indie rock has its fair share of guitar heroes.

All my guitar heroes seem to be teams. Tom Verlaine/Richard Lloyd, John Reis/Rick Froberg, Corin Tucker/Carrie Brownstein, J. Robbins/Bill Barbot.

Guitar posses!  
Logged

Dimmukane

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,683
  • juicer
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #63 on: 08 Dec 2008, 22:32 »

I was responding to this bit.

I suppose this just shows that different people have different amounts of empathy (probably not the right word) for guitar. I personally hear a whole lot of feeling in that song. And if you can't hear the feeling in guitar, there's probably no way you can enjoy music where guitar is the focal point of the composition.

I am basically trying to say that the last thread we had on this subject taught me not to talk like that.  I was trying to play the devil's advocate.  I didn't actually mean to infer that one song was better than the other.  I just do not like solo-esque material in this vein, because I was brought up with orchestral classical music.  I have always thought that a really tightly-knit group was far better than a singular musician with a backup band because of the way all the different notes melded together.

I don't think shred is utter shit (well, I can't fucking stand Yngwie).  It is there and it is good music, but it's very hard for me to enjoy.  There can be insanely technical good music.  Case in point, guitarists like the one in that video, John Maa, lots of classical guitar music in general, some of the better tech-death bands, etc. 

Anyways, I have to go to bed. 
Logged
Quote from: Johnny C
all clothes reflect identity constructs, destroy these constructs by shedding your clothes and sending pictures of the process to the e-mail address linked under my avatar

Catacombs

  • Psychopath in a hockey mask
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 617
Logged
Seriously.  You know who's big on milking good deeds for PR points?  God.

Pixar: More Classy than God.

Cyanide09

  • Guest
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #65 on: 09 Dec 2008, 11:44 »

This sums up what I think

1. Satriani should get over it, there are only a finite number of notes, hence chords, hence chord progressions. This is further limited by what our ears/brains tell us sounds good. Also, coldplay's song has lyrics which would further change the song...
2. Satriani is boring, as is most instrumental shred.
3. Coldplay should go back to their "Rush of Blood..." sound, so much better than the new stuff.

and finally...
I only acknowledge the existence of one Satch.
This is so true.
Logged

MadassAlex

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,050
  • "Tasteful"?
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #66 on: 09 Dec 2008, 11:52 »

2. Satriani is boring, as is most instrumental shred.

There are a few posts just above yours which explain precisely why that was a poor argument.

I am cool with opinions and all, but in the context of your post, that was pretty douchebaggy.
Logged

Thrillho

  • Global Moderator
  • Awakened
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13,130
  • Tall. Beets.
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #67 on: 09 Dec 2008, 14:35 »

My key problem with 'guitar wankery' has evolved beyond the wankery aspect. Admittedly, that was my major problem with it for a while but it's since been pointed out to me that most of them do have some feeling in there, etc. etc. The thing is, I have to ask - would Vai, Satch or Yngwie have record deals if they couldn't play that fast? If you took away the fact that they're awesome guitar players, would their songs alone be strong enough?

As for that link to Satch talking about it, he has an interesting point, but I think the fact that someone else tried to sue them over the same song speaks volumes.
Logged
In the end, the thing people will remember is kindness.

Spluff

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,410
  • it is time to party
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #68 on: 09 Dec 2008, 17:03 »

The thing is, I have to ask - would Vai, Satch or Yngwie have record deals if they couldn't play that fast? If you took away the fact that they're awesome guitar players, would their songs alone be strong enough?

I'd say they would. Their compositional talent most definitely stands up on it's own - their slower, most interesting songs often become fan favorites. For example, the top two Buckethead albums on last fm are Colma and Electric Tears. These albums are slow, calming, and take their time building to powerful crescendos (in a post rock sort of vein). Sure, being able to play fast probably attracts a few listeners, but when that's all you have ,you end up in the realm of Michael Angelo Batio - renowned for his speed, but nobody actually listens to his albums.
Logged
[16:27] Ozy:  has joined the room
[16:27] Quietus: porn necklace!
[16:27] Quietus: Shove it up yer vag!
[16:27] Ozy: has left the room

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #69 on: 09 Dec 2008, 17:40 »

Also can we please stop justifying why we don't like shred? Isn't saying "I don't like really fast guitar playing" good enough?

No, because that doesn't explain why shred is usually tedious while bluegrass is usually awesome.
Logged

Spluff

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,410
  • it is time to party
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #70 on: 09 Dec 2008, 17:55 »

Counterpoint:

That is explained by how bluegrass is usually cheesy and campy whilst fuck you



I liked your other post better. This forum doesn't have enough gypsy jazz.
« Last Edit: 09 Dec 2008, 17:58 by Spluff »
Logged
[16:27] Ozy:  has joined the room
[16:27] Quietus: porn necklace!
[16:27] Quietus: Shove it up yer vag!
[16:27] Ozy: has left the room

ViolentDove

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,396
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #71 on: 09 Dec 2008, 20:49 »

Let's talk more about Django Reinhardt. Now, he was one badarse motherfucker! He lived in a caravan in the manouche part of town, and one day his caravan caught fire and the resulting injuries  rendered one of his hands into a twisted claw. Then he had to re-learn how to play guitar with a claw hand, and became one of the greatest guitarists in the history of jazz, as well as bringing the hot club sound to the world. Also, the dude had a badarse moustache.
Logged
With cake ownership set to C and cake consumption set to K, then C + K = 0.  So indeed as one consumes a cake, one simultaneously deprives oneself of cake ownership. 

ViolentDove

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,396
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #72 on: 09 Dec 2008, 21:03 »

P.S. Everyone should listen to John McLaughlin, Jon Madof, and John Scofield if they want to hear some virtuoso guitar playing that is both interesting and lovely. Two of them were also in bands with Miles Davis. Coincidence? I think not!
Logged
With cake ownership set to C and cake consumption set to K, then C + K = 0.  So indeed as one consumes a cake, one simultaneously deprives oneself of cake ownership. 

_yoda

  • Plantmonster
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 35
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #73 on: 09 Dec 2008, 21:05 »

Let's talk more about Django Reinhardt. Now, he was one badarse motherfucker! He lived in a caravan in the manouche part of town, and one day his caravan caught fire and the resulting injuries  rendered one of his hands into a twisted claw. Then he had to re-learn how to play guitar with a claw hand, and became one of the greatest guitarists in the history of jazz, as well as bringing the hot club sound to the world. Also, the dude had a badarse moustache.

Word

Plus, dude had such an incredible sense of modal theory that was innate to his playing, yet he couldn't even tell you what a "B" was on his guitar. It was all pure musicality.
Logged

Spluff

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,410
  • it is time to party
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #74 on: 09 Dec 2008, 21:08 »

Dude couldn't even tell you what the letter B looked like
Logged
[16:27] Ozy:  has joined the room
[16:27] Quietus: porn necklace!
[16:27] Quietus: Shove it up yer vag!
[16:27] Ozy: has left the room

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #75 on: 09 Dec 2008, 21:09 »

Also, in the Quintette du Hot Club de France, there were two other guitarists, playing rhythm. It's like Django Reinhardt's guitar had two servants. It's like it was king of the guitars.
Logged

MadassAlex

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,050
  • "Tasteful"?
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #76 on: 09 Dec 2008, 21:13 »

Also can we please stop justifying why we don't like shred? Isn't saying "I don't like really fast guitar playing" good enough? This is a pretty subjective thing, after all - there's no use in trying to convince people who like guitar shredding that it is not good music, and there is no point in trying to convince people who do not like guitar shredding that it is good music. The entire discussion is really silly and gets old really fast.

That's not the issue.

The issue is simply the fact that people come up with ridiculous reasons as to why they don't like shred, or needlessly stereotype and judge the genre when they don't know shit about it. Both of those require justification, otherwise they're just silly.

I mean, "I don't like shred" is the best reason for not liking shred. "I don't like shred because it has no emotion" and "I don't like shred because it is meaningless" are just two arguments that are utter bull and that no-one who views music with on open mind should accept. I will stop having problems with people who give negative opinions about shred when they can either give their opinion eloquently and/or can validate any claims they make about it. Here's a good reason for not like shred:

"I don't get much out of instrumental music, and I feel that faster sections go right past me"

Those are fantastic reasons for not liking shred.

Let me apply the kind of anti-shred sentiment to another genre, just for the sake of an example.

"Country is all boring"

That seems pretty uninformed to anyone, ever. That's because I don't know utter shit about country music and don't really like it in the first place, therefore I am largely ignorant of what it is, its musicians and its nuances. Just because I like the blues, which is a fairly similar genre, doesn't give me license to talk shit about country. It seems utterly ridiculous that someone of any intelligence would say something like that.

My key problem with 'guitar wankery' has evolved beyond the wankery aspect. Admittedly, that was my major problem with it for a while but it's since been pointed out to me that most of them do have some feeling in there, etc. etc. The thing is, I have to ask - would Vai, Satch or Yngwie have record deals if they couldn't play that fast? If you took away the fact that they're awesome guitar players, would their songs alone be strong enough?

You can't just take away a musical element from a player and question their relevance. It's like asking, "Would Mozart still kick ass without a choir backing him up?". Mozart sometimes wrote music with a choir as a major articulation. Speed is just one of many musical articulations and the general thought that speed only serves as a wow factor perplexes me to no end. You wouldn't say "Well, let's drop Darkness Descends to 120 bpm and see if it still kicks ass", because the speed of Darkness Descends, like in much of thrash, relies on speed as one element of the music.
Just like anything else, preferred speed is just that - preferred and subjective. Every culture has different standards of speed in their music, so the implication that speed is a less important musical element than others is the musical equivalent of saying that maybe Renaissance art was shit. That is, completely subjective and, well, subject to the culture of the time and area.

Secondly, such a post reveals one's inexperience with the less-than-aptly named genre of "shred". It should read "instrumental hard rock/metal", because speed isn't a necessary factor in the music. Just about every recording "shred" artist can and sometimes does annihilate the fretboard, but many of their songs have a stronger relationship with pop rock than, say, progressive rock. Satch and Vai are perfect examples. Both of them are well-known for pushing technical boundaries, but plenty, perhaps more than half their songs are mid or low tempo with only short bursts of virtuosity, if any.

P.S. To DynamiteKid: I think you are one of the cooler people on this forum. I am saying this because I disagree with everything you have to say about music, but I like you personally. Just in case you think I'm on your case or something, but I can see how you might think that.
Logged

Nodaisho

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,658
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #77 on: 09 Dec 2008, 21:27 »

Django Reinhardt also inspired Tony Iommi to pick the guitar up again after the machine accident he lost his fingertips in.
Logged
I took a duck in the face at two hundred and fifty knots

tswift_2

  • Notorious N.U.R.R.
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #78 on: 09 Dec 2008, 22:40 »

I don't care, I never liked Coldplay, but that mashup sounds amazing. My new ringtone.

Word. That is a legitimate statement
Logged

MadassAlex

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,050
  • "Tasteful"?
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #79 on: 10 Dec 2008, 00:19 »

Well, I felt like that post was aimed at me, so I guess I just agree with you then.
Logged

Thrillho

  • Global Moderator
  • Awakened
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 13,130
  • Tall. Beets.
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #80 on: 10 Dec 2008, 03:51 »

You can't just take away a musical element from a player and question their relevance. It's like asking, "Would Mozart still kick ass without a choir backing him up?". Mozart sometimes wrote music with a choir as a major articulation. Speed is just one of many musical articulations and the general thought that speed only serves as a wow factor perplexes me to no end. You wouldn't say "Well, let's drop Darkness Descends to 120 bpm and see if it still kicks ass", because the speed of Darkness Descends, like in much of thrash, relies on speed as one element of the music.
Just like anything else, preferred speed is just that - preferred and subjective. Every culture has different standards of speed in their music, so the implication that speed is a less important musical element than others is the musical equivalent of saying that maybe Renaissance art was shit. That is, completely subjective and, well, subject to the culture of the time and area.

I kind of realised while I was writing it, but wrote it late at night and posted it anyway for reasons that escape me. It's kind of like saying 'would The Beatles have got signed if John Lennon wasn't John fucking Lennon?'

Secondly, such a post reveals one's inexperience with the less-than-aptly named genre of "shred". It should read "instrumental hard rock/metal", because speed isn't a necessary factor in the music. Just about every recording "shred" artist can and sometimes does annihilate the fretboard, but many of their songs have a stronger relationship with pop rock than, say, progressive rock. Satch and Vai are perfect examples. Both of them are well-known for pushing technical boundaries, but plenty, perhaps more than half their songs are mid or low tempo with only short bursts of virtuosity, if any.

This is just stemming from a misunderstanding, as I thought I mentioned in my post that these guys don't spend their whole time playing as fast as they can, but clearly I didn't. My point still was that I reckon that was probably a key reason for them having record deals, though, and I stand by that, honestly.

P.S. To DynamiteKid: I think you are one of the cooler people on this forum. I am saying this because I disagree with everything you have to say about music, but I like you personally. Just in case you think I'm on your case or something, but I can see how you might think that.

Thanks man, I appreciate that - you do virtually always disagree with me, but we never bullshit around, it's always thrashed out properly and I appreciate that.
Logged
In the end, the thing people will remember is kindness.

MadassAlex

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,050
  • "Tasteful"?
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #81 on: 10 Dec 2008, 04:54 »

Absolutely no record exec signs artists on technical merit alone. There's thousands of supremely technical guitarists out there to equal Malmsteen, except Malmsteen actually writes acceptable-to-actually-quite-good music. A complete focus on technicality leaves no room for creativity, and every shred guitarists I've heard talk on the subject says that. Satch, check. Vai, check. Friedman, check. Malmsteen, check. Every single one urges their musician fans to develop phrasing over technique (and guys like Kiko Loureiro do both at the same time), and the implication there is that these guitarists could have more technical skill than they already do - they preferred to spend that time developing other areas of musicianship.

But I can see why you wouldn't give much credit to record execs.
Logged

Christophe

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,793
  • FUCK IT, WE'LL DO IT LIVE
    • last.fm!
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #82 on: 10 Dec 2008, 15:11 »

A Thought Occurs. (Well, one cross-posted from the PRF.)

Apparently there are at least three other songs that share a similar chord progression and melody to "If I Could Fly" and "Viva La Vida", the list is as follows:

1) 1981 - Marty Balin "Hearts"
2) 1992 - Babik Reinhardt "Histoire simple"
3) 2002 - Enanitos Verdes "Frances Limon"
4) 2004 - Joe Satriani "If I could Fly"
5) 2008 - Coldplay "Viva la Vida"

I was actually thinking about it the other day: if you take 100 musicians/songwriters who have never heard either "If I Could Fly" or "Viva la Vida", give them the chord progression to both songs and asked them to write a melody over it, how many of them would write a melody that resembles the one in either song?

I think this would be a rad experiment to try out. Quick, someone hail a scientist.
Logged

Johnny C

  • Mentat
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,483
  • i wanna be yr slide dog
    • I AM A WHORE FOR MY OWN MUSIC
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #83 on: 11 Dec 2008, 01:19 »

It came across (as well as most of G3's music) as the kind of light jazz/yacht rock/muzak you'd hear whilst shopping in Kohl's or someplace similar.

Oh man I never realized how much this is true of Vai/Satriani. I mean, the yacht is moving very quickly, but it's still a yacht.
Logged
[02:12] yuniorpocalypse: let's talk about girls
[02:12] Thug In Kitchen: nooo

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #84 on: 11 Dec 2008, 01:29 »

According to some report I read today, Satriani claims to have spent ten years writing the tune in question.

Ten. Years.
Logged

Brian Majestic

  • Obscure cultural reference
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 128
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #85 on: 11 Dec 2008, 07:37 »

If it took him ten years to write that piece of crap he deserves to lose the case.
Logged

nufan

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 299
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #86 on: 11 Dec 2008, 13:29 »

Joe satriani is... PROUD of writing that turd?
Logged

Cyanide09

  • Guest
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #87 on: 11 Dec 2008, 14:23 »

2. Satriani is boring, as is most instrumental shred.

There are a few posts just above yours which explain precisely why that was a poor argument.

I am cool with opinions and all, but in the context of your post, that was pretty douchebaggy.

Basically you're being douchebaggy. My second bullet point was just an opinion. There's far more people in this post trying to prove theirs as fact.
 And there's a simple solution to the whole thing. Listen to something better :)
Logged

MadassAlex

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,050
  • "Tasteful"?
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #88 on: 11 Dec 2008, 14:38 »

As a general point, Satch writes all his songs over a long period of time. He probably had the chord progression or melody written down for a long time before he used it to record anything.

I'd assume Satch spends a little time on many concepts, considering that he's continued to put out music fairly regularly over his career.

NO U
Listen to something better :)

Man. Jus' sayin', y'know?
Logged

atimholt

  • Emoticontraindication
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 72
  • How am I supposed to fit my paradigm into this sma
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #89 on: 11 Dec 2008, 15:16 »

I like Coldplay because they're boring. It's great sleepy time music. I'm serious.
But I don't get the hype of Viva ta Vida. Probably because I find it boring.

EDIT: Dangit, I changed the incorrect capital L in 'la' to a friggin' 't' when making this post.
« Last Edit: 11 Dec 2008, 17:57 by atimholt »
Logged
So... stuff.

KickThatBathProf

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,973
  • hey there
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #90 on: 11 Dec 2008, 15:53 »

Wait, lemme get this straight.  You like Coldplay because they're boring, but yet you don't like the new album because it's boring.  That no make sense.
Logged
dumplings are the answer because the foreskin boys

Alex C

  • comeback tour!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,915
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #91 on: 11 Dec 2008, 17:44 »

Well, people also use white noise machines for getting to sleep at night, but white noise machines don't get record deals and critical cred, so I sort of see what he's saying.

An analogy: If I were to use a copy of Atlas Shrugged to level my coffee table and it performed the task admirably, I still wouldn't understand why so many people have boners for Ayn Rand's writing.
« Last Edit: 11 Dec 2008, 17:46 by Alex C »
Logged
the ship has Dr. Pepper but not Mr. Pibb; it's an absolute goddamned travesty

BrilliantEraser

  • The German Chancellory building
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 451
  • We're kings among runaways
    • Brilliant Eraser Productions
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #92 on: 11 Dec 2008, 17:51 »

Well, people also use white noise machines for getting to sleep at night, but white noise machines don't get record deals and critical cred, so I sort of see what he's saying.

An analogy: If I were to use a copy of Atlas Shrugged to level my coffee table and it performed the task admirably, I still wouldn't understand why so many people have boners for Ayn Rand's writing.

You just made me so sad. I am a few chapters into Atlas Shrugged and the writing is just mesmerizing. Different people like different things. Me trying to explain to you why I like Ayn Rand would be similar to a physicist trying to explain the String Theory to me (they have tried it before). No matter what, it is just a difficult concept to grasp. ::shrug::
Logged
Quote from: Khar
*bloop bloop bloop*

MrBlu

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,543
  • I probably don't
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #93 on: 11 Dec 2008, 20:05 »

Well, people also use white noise machines for getting to sleep at night, but white noise machines don't get record deals and critical cred, so I sort of see what he's saying.

An analogy: If I were to use a copy of Atlas Shrugged to level my coffee table and it performed the task admirably, I still wouldn't understand why so many people have boners for Ayn Rand's writing.
Your analogy makes me happy.
Logged
rather than place the blame on somebody's undeveloped irony sensor, let's just blame the internet, k?
My Last.FM

Christophe

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,793
  • FUCK IT, WE'LL DO IT LIVE
    • last.fm!
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #94 on: 11 Dec 2008, 20:09 »

white noise machines don't get record deals and critical cred



Which I would listen to rather than Coldplay or Joe Satriani.
Logged

Dimmukane

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,683
  • juicer
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #95 on: 11 Dec 2008, 20:18 »

Well, people also use white noise machines for getting to sleep at night, but white noise machines don't get record deals and critical cred, so I sort of see what he's saying.

An analogy: If I were to use a copy of Atlas Shrugged to level my coffee table and it performed the task admirably, I still wouldn't understand why so many people have boners for Ayn Rand's writing.

You just made me so sad. I am a few chapters into Atlas Shrugged and the writing is just mesmerizing. Different people like different things. Me trying to explain to you why I like Ayn Rand would be similar to a physicist trying to explain the String Theory to me (they have tried it before). No matter what, it is just a difficult concept to grasp. ::shrug::

Everyone on QC seems to not like her very much.  I haven't figured out why.  I don't like her either, because once she presents you with an idea she bashes you over the head (there is a speech towards the end of the book that is 50 pages long and takes up 3 hours in the timeline of the novel.  No descriptors in between, just one dude talking for 50 pages) with it repeatedly/her protagonists have no flaws/I could go on and on.  But I don't know why the board doesn't like it.
Logged
Quote from: Johnny C
all clothes reflect identity constructs, destroy these constructs by shedding your clothes and sending pictures of the process to the e-mail address linked under my avatar

Alex C

  • comeback tour!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,915
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #96 on: 11 Dec 2008, 20:44 »

I disagree a bit with the String Theory analogy (I don't understand String Theory either though). I have a good handle on Rand's body of work; mostly I just think she should have stuck to essays. As Dimmukane pointed out, her characters are such thinly veiled vehicles for the ideas she's peddling that I would rather have had her abandon the narrative conceits and get right down to business. As it is, her stories are couched in such absolutes that I find them a bit ridiculous whenever I read them-- there is after all, a happy medium between charity and martyrdom. Plus, she was too quick to demonize people who didn't go along with her mindset for my tastes. That reputation was a bit hard for me to shake when I was reading her books, since, after all, they exist only as vehicles for expressing her philosophy.
« Last Edit: 11 Dec 2008, 20:50 by Alex C »
Logged
the ship has Dr. Pepper but not Mr. Pibb; it's an absolute goddamned travesty

Nodaisho

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,658
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #97 on: 11 Dec 2008, 21:11 »

Yeah, if I am going to read something chock-full of someone's philosophy, I am going to pick one that I agree with. I would mention Pratchett here, but he manages to fit convincing and entertaining characters in with his jokes and philosophy, so it isn't really an author tract like hers.
Logged
I took a duck in the face at two hundred and fifty knots

MadassAlex

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,050
  • "Tasteful"?
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #98 on: 11 Dec 2008, 22:13 »

they exist only as vehicles for expressing her philosophy.

Isn't that largely the point?

I mean, literature isn't always about explaining one's philosophy, but if there's nothing to express via the book then what's the point?
Logged

Alex C

  • comeback tour!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,915
Re: Coldplay sued by Joe Satriani
« Reply #99 on: 11 Dec 2008, 23:00 »

My problem is with the execution as a whole, not any one facet of what she's attempting. Her characters are thin enough that it's hard for me to approach the book as anything but an expression of her views, and since I often disagree with her, the whole narrative just becomes harder and harder for me to accept as the story heads to its conclusion. As I said before, I just feel like she should have stuck with an essay, since that merely requires me to read her ideas and then base an opinion, not slog through her shoddy narrative.


Anyway, all I'm trying to say with my posts on Rand is that I dislike her work due to my own personal tastes, not because I have failed to grasp her message.
Logged
the ship has Dr. Pepper but not Mr. Pibb; it's an absolute goddamned travesty
Pages: 1 [2] 3   Go Up