Hey, I notice you deliberately omitted the part where I said that your posts were sexist.
You win a cookie.
In other words, it's not that crazy girls are good in bed; it's that through the distorted perception of our borderline-misogynistic male egos, a woman being good in bed is evidence of her craziness.
That's an interesting analysis. And I won't deny that it could very well be true, considering I myself am male and I've got my share of distortions, some of them possibly misogynistic.
However,
I'd like to offer the theorem that a woman being good in bed (for that matter, ANYONE being good in bed) is the ability to abandon self-restraint and hedonistically enjoy pleasure.
This could also explain why sex for some folks is better when they're drunk; Some people are just too uptight to enjoy sex because their own "nearly automatic" self-restraints prevent them from doing so.
Crazy folks, that is, folks whose behaviors lie significantly outside the statistical norm (whatever that may be as determined by both society and by the witch-doctors--er, I mean psychologists--of that society, indicate that possibly the level of self-restraint a person exercises/is capable of both affects what could be considered deviant behavior AND the enjoyment of sex.
Or it could just be simpler than that: People classified as "Crazy" are folks who are more pleasure oriented, and thus, give and get more pleasure out of the act.
Boring is boring, in or out of bed. It's just that being boring is considered "normal" in society, whereas being intense, creative, and volatile are traits of someone "unstable."
Alas.
S