Unfortunately.
And while I'm bitching about trends in music I dislike, let me state my hatred for the concept that punk rock is all about being as simple as possible.
People have to look at it in context of the times. Punk rock emerged in an era saturated in bands that used instrumental wank for no specific purpose and couldn't hold a candle to the likes of Hendrix, Sabbath, Deep Purple and other bands that begun the trend of lengthy instrumental sections. Most punk rockers of the time were also financially poor, so they couldn't afford the resources that would allow them to become highly skilled at their instruments. Many couldn't even afford their own instruments and had to borrow from friends.
In the context of the times, yes, punk rock was all about extreme simplicity and being obnoxiously irreverent.
But we now live in an age where almost everyone who lives in a physically stable location has access to the internet, and therefore, free access to numerous resources that'll allow them to become skilled at their chosen instrument given passion and time. I think it's great if people like that simple sound of punk. More power to them. But developing only basic skill in your instrument implies that you don't care very much, which begs the question: why even make music in the first place? If you don't care enough to learn your shit properly, I'm pretty sure you're not trying to express anything, anyway.
What I'm saying here is that punk isn't a sound. It's working-class rage at abusive power structures. Thrash metal, as a genre, is way more punky than most modern bands considered "punk". The same applies to old-school hip-hop and rap, in my mind.
We are at a point where genres that are not punk are more punky than punk.