Or you should just look at my awesome microsoft paint version of half nelson instead.

After reading the responses to this thread, I'd like to say:
Firstly, that I love Henry Rollins, and if Rollins made a hip hop R&B album produced by Lil Wayne and Chamillionaire I'd probably buy it. Especially if one of the tracks featured Lydia Lunch.
Lastly, I understand that there's this whole "Art is art no matter what medium one uses" ideology, but I don't necessarily agree with it. Just because someone is an amazing painter (for example) and they have a relatively decent singing voice, doesn't mean that they should star in a feature film just to make some extra money. I guess that's all interchangeable. Just because someone is an amazing singer, and a relatively decent actor, doesn't mean they should paint a few mediocre paintings and try to sell them for a buttload of money. or Just because someone is an amazing actor, and a relatively decent painter, doesn't mean that they should put out a new mainstream pop/rock/hip hop album to make some extra money.
I guess my beef isn't with the medium in which an artist chooses to express themselves with, but rather the idea that just because I'm successful with one medium means that I must be successful with all mediums. I suppose it's just another way to attach another tag to their "brand." Oh he/she is an actor,singer, poet, artist, perfumer,clothier,mogul,mongul acrobatic gymnast with a penchant for adventure and a sex tape.
i wish those were the tags attached to my personal brand...sigh.