Fun Stuff > BAND

The Least Offensive Music in the World

<< < (70/89) > >>

De_El:
Ugh, sorry, I have to veto "For What It's Worth." I think I may have liked it at some point, but for various reasons, among them an asshole friend of mine who contributed to ruining it for me, I cannot stand that song.

RallyMonkey:
I'm going to veto everything on this page except for The Zombies.

And everything that was posted after the list was last posted on the last page that was not already vetoed, outside of Bob Dylan.

Updated list:

Beatles - Helter Skelter
Fats Waller - Ain't Misbehavin'
Moondog - Lament I "Bird's Lament"
Duke Ellington - Ko-Ko
Duke Ellington - Cottontail
The Zombies - I'll Call You Mine
Bob Dylan - Don't Think Twice It's Alright

KickThatBathProf:
I believe Duke Ellington was vetoed unfortunely (also I am furrowing my brow at you for vetoing Sir Duke)

Also what the hell is up with vetoing something because it's boring.  I mean, doesn't that generally mean it's inoffensive?

De_El:
The title of the thread is a misnomer. The precedent established by previous pages of this thread isn't that a song you don't veto fails to offend you, but rather that you actually like it. "Like" however, is also being used as a somewhat loose term, a minimum of positive feeling and appreciation for a song being sufficient to prevent vetoing.

Also, a song you find boring can be offensive in the sense that it bores you when you'd rather not be bored, and you're meant to be listening to the song, rather than playing the song while doing something else entirely and not retaining any meaningful memory of what the song was like. In this case, you may find at the end of the song it was a waste of your time, or you'd rather have stopped it part way through instead of bothering with the whole thing.

RallyMonkey:
What do you mean by "unfortunate"?

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page