Fun Stuff > CLIKC
Nintendo 3DS Announced
KharBevNor:
--- Quote from: Sox on 25 Mar 2010, 09:05 ---3D gaming was a bullshit gimmick right up until Super Mario 64 was developed.
--- End quote ---
What.
Sox:
I don't personally believe exactly that. I just think that's the point in time where people should have taken their words and eaten them. Super Mario in 3D was revolutionary, a pivotal moment in videogame history. There was a lot of skepticism about how well it was gonna work. Then it came out and it was absolutely mind blowing. Playing Super Mario 64 for the first time was a better feeling than any blowjob I've ever had. I maintain the belief that it was a significant event.
Since then, we haven't had another comparable moment in videogames.
I'm not saying that the 3D technology we're speculating about is going to be as important for videogames as Super Mario 64 was. At first, it'll probably be shallow and kinda suck. But if what's being talked about isn't making you even slightly excited then there's no talking to you, you're a soulless abomination. You have no imagination. A husk of a human being. A sad approximation of a videogamer. We're talking about the potential to control videogame cameras with your EYES. To control the view by LOOKING. If you've ever enjoyed a videogame, you like that idea. If you protest, you're either full of shit, or completely mental.
3D stopped being a gimmick when Super Mario 64 happened. That's the point where people should have shut their mouths and accepted progress. 3D movies? Blue furries jumping out of the cinema screen to hump your leg? Still a gimmick, yeah. That's the illusion of 3D. One fixed viewpoint. That's not real 3D, it's a bullshit lie. What people are speculating about here actually sounds like magic to me. The demos that Jordan linked are pretty impressive, and those are nothing more than ideas. An early approximation of what we're hoping to see.
Does using your actual eyes, instead of virtual eyes controlled in the game environment actually sound like a gimmick to you? That kind of technology could potentially fix the biggest problem with most 3D games. They have really shitty cameras. There's no better in game camera than the human eye.
Yes, the technology isn't quite there yet. But eventually it will happen. Are people still going to be saying it's a bullshit gimmick?
JESUS CHRIST PEOPLE! THEY ARE TALKING ABOUT MAGIC! REAL MAGIC!
That kind of technology can't be acheived by SCIENCE, this shit is being developed by real life wizards, and if real life wizards developing tech for videogames doesn't arouse any excitement in you, then I hope you choke on your tongue, you'd have to be incapable of joy! WIZARDS! Pointy hat robey shit!
KharBevNor:
Darryl, 3D games had existed for over a decade when Super Mario 64 came out. No one on the whole fucking planet considered 3D to be a 'gimmick' at the time. Super Mario 64 had a pretty good camera system, I suppose, but please stop talking out of your arse.
Johnny C:
i'm trying to think of non-vector 3D games from '86 and they just aren't coming
est:
Duke Nukem' 3D was released in Jan '96, Quake was released a day before Super Mario 64. These were just slight enhancements to shit like Wolfenstein 3D (92) & Doom (93), which were in turn enhancements on games before them, and so on. The graphics in Super Mario 64 weren't some kind of massive revelation, I think maybe it was more what they did with the switch from 2D to 3D environment within the Mario setting. If they can do something similar with true 3D graphics then I'll get onboard. I have to admit that I made a knee-jerk reaction based on 3D in movies, which I mostly think is a load of horsecrap being used to sell shitty movies.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version