OK, been thinkin' (is it getting warm in here?)
Faye's "Douuuuuche" was kind of uncalled for. "Horndoooogg", maybe.
I'll buy that, mainly because Steve, so far as I know, doesn't know Marigold. It's one thing to 'take what is offered' when you think it's casual, and another when you're fair certain the other person is going into this wanting more, and still another when you know she hasn't the experience to realize simply offering you her body isn't the way to get it*. (Remember, Marigold didn't say, "I wanna get laid" —she said, "I think we can be more.") If Steve did the one-night thing with a girl he absolutely knew was expecting him to be the love of her life afterward without correcting her first, then,
then we say "Douuuuuche." 'Cause that's taking advantage and hurting, all to get your rocks off, which isn't, for non-douches, anyway, the primary concern.
And Tomart, Sven damned well did know he'd screwed up—why else was he prepared for the lies next day? He knew Faye was going to be hurt, that's why. Anyone who goes into their relationships like a fucking lawyer** (Hey, it's what she
said we were, and I argue that this means…) is almost guaranteed to stomp on hearts. There's feelings involved, and many, many people are atrocious about talking about them, Faye not the least. Of course, that's great for anyone who doesn't give a shit about the other person (see
douche). But if you care about the person, even if you're as clueless as Angus can be, you have to think about what's not being said, but that you know exists within the person. That's called being a friend, and I hope, anyway, that friendship comes before fucking. Faye was right: Angus is a good man. Sven, not so much, although he may be trying now.
Better stop there—outta breath. Damn the pollen.
*Or he. And, like it or not, Western cultural convention makes this appear to be a viable transaction, depicting it endlessly in TV, novels, religion, what have you. Don't like it? Suck it up—it's how it is at the moment. You can detest it, want to change it, try to change it, but you can't say it doesn't exist, or refuse to deal with it when a naive person tries to make the exchange. Want to change the world? Start with caring about the person next to you. And yes, Carl, I sometimes think it would make the world better if we could divorce sex from
automatic emotional involvement. But we ain't there yet, probably because we need more emotional involvement that's not dependent on sex.
**Literally, I suppose