Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WDT: June 14-18, 2010 (1686-1690)
zagraf:
I respect Jeph's decision to alter his comics as he sees fit. That said, it's a little strange he should get qualms about the firecracker strip when he posts much, much more disgusting cartoons on his LJ (e.g. a dog ass-fucking David Willis, during Jeph's pretend-feud with him) and, more recently, on his Tumblr (e.g. a birthday card he did for a friend showing Sweet-Tits flashing the recipient as all sorts of gross things fly out of her breasts and Yelling Bird ejaculates).
So tell me, what's the difference between Jeph posting those sorts of things in his online journals, which are after all available for everyone to read, and his doing so in QC? Again, his decision, but it doesn't make much sense.
skine:
The issue I have is with the story leading up to the original and the "redo."
In the former, YB has somehow talked ST into begrudgingly doing something sexy and dangerous to ST.
In the latter, YB has somehow talked ST into begrudgingly doing something that might harm YB and could be interpreted as slightly homoerotic.
So which makes more sense: YB does what YB always does to ST, or ST doesn't want to kill YB (which she has already attempted) and YB willingly compromises himself.
Doc:
Bad redo, because you can only properly see what's happening if you already saw the original.
Near Lurker:
Deleted by author due to crazy.
jwhouk:
<facepalm_level=MASSIVE>
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version