Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WDT: June 14-18, 2010 (1686-1690)
Near Lurker:
I'd have to say they were both appropriate for Yelling Bird... but the first was much funnier, "offensive" as it might have been. Good luck writing Yelling Bird without being offensive.
I will say that this new strip is more Sweet-Tits, however.
Fhqwhgads:
--- Quote from: Kharn on 20 Jun 2010, 06:20 ---I always thought the whole point of yelling bird was to be as offensive as possible. Change it back. :cry:
--- End quote ---
Tanman:
lame replacement comic is lame.
One of the points of web comics is no censorship.
Yelling Bird just got his testicles burned off.
Prince of Space:
--- Quote from: Tuitsuro on 19 Jun 2010, 12:56 ---It was creepy and offensive. That's what was funny!
--- End quote ---
I'd like to know why anyone actually thought the first one was 'creepy and offensive' (or funny). If Sweet Tits hadn't been doing it voluntarily, it would've been offensive. But she wasn't forced. I think a lot of people who might've been offended were mixed up. You guys weren't angry because it was creepy! You guys were offended that it was completely unfunny!
And the replacement would only be funny if Yelling Bird ended up flying off with one of the rockets. Either an explosion or mild charring would've been enough for me.
Carl-E:
I found the funny in the details. YB with the Zippo in both talons. The scorch marks on ST's panties from the rocket's red glare. Ad the fact that YB talked/coerced/forced her into doing it in the first place.
I mean, how drunk would you have to be before this agreeing to something like this?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version