Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT: 2181-2185 (7-11 May 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Is it cold in here?:
MA in our world bans anything with a blade longer than 1.5 inches. On the other hand, CoD hasn't gotten in any trouble we've seen for having a sword.
Redball:
--- Quote from: jmucchiello on 11 May 2012, 09:03 ---And who made this formula, it doesn't work in reverse for me. I'm 44. That implies I'm still viable for a 74 year old on the prowl. I don't think so.
--- End quote ---
Well, you've done the math for me, at least. I'm 74, but thinking she should be no less than 65... and a retired MI schoolteacher, who served in the Peace Corps, listens to NPR, can carry a tune (my first two wives couldn't) ... and ... yeah, it would be neat if she has a waist and acknowledges each of my puns. I don't care how; a groan or a Fayesque or Fayequed punch would do.
Wright:
Vascetomies were in Penny Arcade too. It is better handled here, but still hugely exaggerated. From my experience, it was two weeks of discomfort followed by years of the best sex. There do need to be other forms of male contraception, though. I wish there had been options.
Method of Madness:
Redball, if someone over the age of 134 tried to date you, that would be creepy.
I think the 1/2+7 works for someone my age (24), 20-34 seems reasonable. Anything below 20 is just too low (and to be honest, I'm still weirded out by the idea of dating someone born in the '90s, which I guess now restricts me to 21/22 and up). As for over 34, 10 years is plenty, there's no reason to date someone older than that.
Redball:
--- Quote from: Method of Madness on 11 May 2012, 11:13 ---Redball, if someone over the age of 134 tried to date you, that would be creepy.
--- End quote ---
I'd never be able to get her out of bed.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version