Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT: 2276-80 (17-21 September 2012) Weekly Comics Discussion Thread
LordVaughn:
i can see where Claire is going with the argument. what seems to be her problem is that she sees almost everything as a logical thing. for example, being outright flabbergasted that her fellow interns were only at the library for reasons not entirely necessary to education. This isnt necessarily a bad thing, but delving into logic far too often around those not aligned to logical things, or aligned to a different form of logic, she will find herself in plenty of situations like this.
jwhouk:
Friday's comic is going to be verrrrryyyyy innnnnteressssstink.
Skewbrow:
... or just a back story: "How Clinton lost his hand."
Daniel Patrick Moynihan:
I think this is another case of Hannelore getting someone's tone all wrong and then not paying attention to what they're saying. And another case of Claire expressing herself poorly then quadrupling down on the poor expression.
Or Hanners is tumblr, Claire is John Campbell, and Marten is Jeph being amused at the altercation.
Carl-E:
Hanners would make an excellent prosecuting attorney.
And Claire's a lousy defendant.
Now, is Clinton your brother, or what?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version