Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

WCDT: 2286-90 (1-5 October 2012) Weekly Comics Discussion Thread

<< < (55/73) > >>

Madmartigan:
All I can say then, is that you don't enjoy fiction then, slapstick humor, sitcoms, fiction in general, humor...

I could go on and get really into it, but I'm afraid I'd end up being a condescending asshole in the process.

You're making much-ado about nothing and it is an incredible wasteful line of questioning that adds nothing to the discussion of the comic as a whole, particularly this strip at large.

There is nothing unfair, sad, or uncomfortable unless you're one of those that is offended by everything no matter the context or purpose.  Geez. 

This is why I left it as I did.  I didn't wanna waste the time answering a tired, drawn out, overly worn and tired out psychoanalytical social argument about a comic's use of a little smack to Angus' drawn out stare of Marigold's ass.

Overkillengine:
Is it dead horse time again?

Mad Cat:
Dayum! Mar-Bear's got some junk in the trunk.

Carl-E:
It's not just  comic strip, it's a slice-of-life comic strip.  You can't say that this doesn't happen in real life. 

And I'd like to point out that it's just basic communication.  Faye let Angus know, directly, that she knows exactly what he was doing and thinking, and that she's not cool with it.  And this was done without a screaming match / argument that would have seriously embarrassed Mar-bear. 

And if you don't think this will be discussed (at length) by the two of them later, then you haven't been involved in a serious relationship! 

Besides, Faye's had experience with shorts like these before...

muffin_of_chaos:
If you want to defuse the potential argument, why not just agree eschatonic has a fairly sound point that could be debated but that you don't want to because it's been done before?
Why the rudeness?

Just curious.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version