Fun Stuff > CHATTER
There oughta be a law!
Method of Madness:
--- Quote from: Barmymoo on 10 Nov 2012, 10:12 ---just that they're too... short... to be outerwear
--- End quote ---
Are we talking short shorts or all shorts?
TheEvilDog:
--- Quote from: Method of Madness on 09 Nov 2012, 22:43 ---I've heard the whole leggings vs. pants before, and I still don't get it. Probably because the word "pants" to me means "something you wear from the waist down that covers your legs". I don't see how leggings aren't pants. Unpleasant looking and tight pants, sure, but pants nonetheless!
--- End quote ---
In situations like this, I remember words given to me by an uncle. "Quit while you're behind."
Barmymoo:
MoM, for me personally, all shorts. I dress in a way that covers my knees and shoulders - with the very occasional exception for dresses which are a bit above the knee and I wear with opaque tights (or leggings!). On other people I don't mind, although long bare legs on attractive women are distracting...
Pilchard123:
Just to really mess things up: Jeggings!
Method of Madness:
TED, I'm not trying to win, I'm just trying to learn. As for jeggings, aside from being...well, kind of weird, I'd consider them pants, but not jeans. In fact, how could leggings have pockets and belt loops and still not be pants?
Wait, no, just read "fake pockets and belt loops". TOBAL against fake pockets. Or pants without pockets at all.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version