Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT

WCDT: 2333-2337 (3-7 December 2012) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread

<< < (26/67) > >>

Soulsynger:

--- Quote from: cesariojpn on 04 Dec 2012, 03:31 ---Pintsize's comment has me wondering: If an AnthroPC can "rewrite memories" like that, does that make them unreliable in criminal cases? Or are they easily hackable? What would stop someone from using one as a trojan horse into secret facilities or use in a crime?

--- End quote ---
I don't think he meant it literally. It might've just been the robot version of "that's how I remember it" or "that's what I was told". It's "headcanon" which isn't exactly like "hardcoding". ... See what I did there?

If they COULD ... I guess using a non-sentient programmed robot as an accomplice would be much less complicated.
And easily hackable... isn't that what humans already are? :D

(Oh wait... this is the QC forums, right? CUE THE HYPERBOLIC DISCUSSION ABOUT THE ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF ... of ... SELF-BRAINWASHING! Damn, that doesn't work.)

MillionDollar Belt Sander:

--- Quote from: DSL on 04 Dec 2012, 03:57 ---
--- Quote from: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 03 Dec 2012, 20:32 ---Is that a tarantula?   

--- End quote ---

Your concern seems quantifiable.

--- End quote ---

I'll prepare the shipping crate.  *nod*

Border Reiver:
Thanks, but no.  Much as live spiders don't phase me (thanks to marrying a pet shop owner), I think that any normally small critter now the size of a small dog and robotic that suddenly drops down from the ceiling and talks, might get a similar response to Marty's.

Or the generous application of a baseball bat.

StevenC:

--- Quote from: Soulsynger on 04 Dec 2012, 04:02 ---
--- Quote from: cesariojpn on 04 Dec 2012, 03:31 ---Pintsize's comment has me wondering: If an AnthroPC can "rewrite memories" like that, does that make them unreliable in criminal cases? Or are they easily hackable? What would stop someone from using one as a trojan horse into secret facilities or use in a crime?

--- End quote ---
I don't think he meant it literally. It might've just been the robot version of "that's how I remember it" or "that's what I was told". It's "headcanon" which isn't exactly like "hardcoding". ... See what I did there?

If they COULD ... I guess using a non-sentient programmed robot as an accomplice would be much less complicated.
And easily hackable... isn't that what humans already are? :D

(Oh wait... this is the QC forums, right? CUE THE HYPERBOLIC DISCUSSION ABOUT THE ETHICAL IMPLICATIONS OF ... of ... SELF-BRAINWASHING! Damn, that doesn't work.)

--- End quote ---
Headcanon pretty much means "That's what I choose to think what happened. (regardless if that's true or not)"

DSL:
Don't be nervous. There are no wrong answers.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page

Go to full version