I am so confused... there's no reason to deadlock anything unless votes are thrown around to begin with and you think they're on an innocent person. And correct me if I'm wrong, but I don't see any other votes prior to Gareth's on me... Also, I said I agreed with what you were previously doing, because you were explaining why you voted the way you did. Not (specifically) because you were trying to keep the vote from going through.
I voted no lynch because it seemed too likely that we would just hinder our own progress by killing one of our own.
I used to 100% agree with that. Here's why I don't anymore... there are three ways to die at the moment:
1) At the hands of the werewolves. "People" who don't have our best interest at heart.
2) At the hands of the unidentified hunter. Sure, s/he's on our side, but at the end of the day, they're acting on their own and don't suffer any consequences.
3) At the hands of the village. We choose who dies and if a lynch goes wrong, we know for a fact what people made it happen, based on who voted and the justification they gave. And among them is
probably a werewolf.
So which do you think gives us the most information as to who is committing these crimes? It's a very cold way of seeing things, but it's our best way of having ANY of us come out alive.
And again, remember we're not voting randomly. At least not at this point. If you vote it should be for a reason. If we were doing a lottery of sorts, THEN I would definitely feel that we were hindering ourselves.