Welcome > Hi, I'm New
Age Roll Call
Boiled Dove:
But really, there are times that I am. Just ask my wife. :lol:
techkid:
--- Quote from: Carl-E on 05 Apr 2013, 07:39 ---But 42! ~= 1.405 x 1051.
That makes you oldest...
--- End quote ---
Older than the universe, even!
You didn't happen to "borrow" the Octavo, did you?
jwhouk:
So - How old are you?
Under the age of 12. 0 (0%)
13-15 1 (1.4%)
16-18 3 (4.3%)
19-21 12 (17.1%)
22-24 18 (25.7%)
25-27 5 (7.1%)
28-30 11 (15.7%)
31-33 0 (0%)
34-36 1 (1.4%)
37-39 1 (1.4%)
40-41 0 (0%)
42! 1 (1.4%)
43-45 2 (2.9%)
46-48 2 (2.9%)
49-51 5 (7.1%)
52-55 (AARP time!) 3 (4.3%)
56-59 1 (1.4%)
60-64 0 (0%)
65+ (Retirement Age!) 3 (4.3%)
I'm only as old as I feel. 1 (1.4%)
Total Members Voted: 70
cesium133:
And now for a ridiculous overanalysis...
The mean age of members here is 30.8, with a standard deviation of 13.4. I had to make some assumptions to get this result: I used the approximation that all people who responded to a certain category were in the center of the category (e.g. all who responded 28-30 were 29). Also, I don't know the ages of the people over 65, so I assumed they were all 65, which will lead to an underestimation of the actual average age.
This is a poor estimation, though, because the distribution is clearly bimodal, with one peak in the 20s and another in the 50s. If I treat this as two separate distributions, I get one with an age of 23.6±4.2, and another with an age of 51.4±7.8. Again, the older distribution is an underestimate, though, because I don't know the ages of the 65+ group.
pwhodges:
--- Quote from: cesium133 on 06 Apr 2013, 15:40 --- I don't know the ages of the people over 65,
--- End quote ---
66 (me), 72 (Celticgeek), 76 (Redball); now you can do more maths.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version