Those are all fair points, they make sense in the context of this forum (as I see it). I just dunno how I feel about seeing a stranger be called a liar, esp. when it's based on assumptions about how people with mental health issues "should" act, and assumptions about how they "should" react to medications... assumptions that don't necessarily hold true in all cases. That is offensive as well. Not to diminish anyone else's reactions, but...
Anyway, best of luck with this new therapist

have you gotten a clear idea of what she'll be trying to do, and how?
In other news, moving from one's regular home to any form of care facility increases one's risk of inappropriately being prescribed psychotropic medication in the
worst way, if one happens to be over 85 years old, irrespective of level of cognitive impairment and clinical indications.
Dear blog thread, I thought I'd learned that putting off writing a paper is teh st00pid because there will come a time when you'll be stuck home writing it while the sun shines bright in the sky and people roam around in shorts and bikinis... but it turns out that my putting off the writing in favour of reading yet MORE articles is going to pay off, in that the first draft will be far more convincing.
The only problem is, I think that we have significant methodological problems, and I'm not sure if I can convince the prof. I dunno if I want to publish something that I know is methodologically shaky, even if
everyone else seems to be doing it as well. Still, life is exciting =)