Fun Stuff > CHATTER
This thread is non-euclidean, for it has no point
GarandMarine:
--- Quote from: Valdís on 14 May 2014, 18:15 ---
--- Quote from: GarandMarine on 14 May 2014, 17:33 ---"4. Hands always in pockets for easy access to MALE PENIS."
--- End quote ---
That awkward moment when people are unintentionally better at trans-inclusion than most 'progressives', in their outrage.
--- End quote ---
Isn't that less inclusive as it doesn't consider the potential of female penises? (pensii?)
snalin:
Peeni
Valdís:
--- Quote from: GarandMarine on 14 May 2014, 19:06 ---Isn't that less inclusive as it doesn't consider the potential of female penises?
--- End quote ---
The specification can imply that there are other kinds. Y'know, like the normal everyday lady variety, not just the outrageous male ones.
Obviously they aren't actually considering that in such a situation, though. :-P
Method of Madness:
--- Quote from: snalin on 14 May 2014, 19:46 ---Peeni
--- End quote ---
Penes. (-is is third declension, and is pluralized into -es)
Valdís:
If one is speaking in Latin which, of course, we are not. So 'penises' is in no way incorrect.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version