Fun Stuff > CHATTER
This thread is non-euclidean, for it has no point
Method of Madness:
Well yeah, "penises" is fine, I was just objecting to anything ending in i.
GarandMarine:
--- Quote from: Valdís on 14 May 2014, 20:01 ---
--- Quote from: GarandMarine on 14 May 2014, 19:06 ---Isn't that less inclusive as it doesn't consider the potential of female penises?
--- End quote ---
The specification can imply that there are other kinds. Y'know, like the normal everyday lady variety, not just the outrageous male ones.
Obviously they aren't actually considering that in such a situation, though. :-P
--- End quote ---
Diversity by specification. :psyduck:
cesium133:
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=s-eEV7b4UCo
:psyduck:
GarandMarine:
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=M57Fi19vcSI
The interview to go with the music:
//www.youtube.com/watch?v=WoshdPpQST0
Akima:
--- Quote from: Method of Madness on 14 May 2014, 20:24 ---Well yeah, "penises" is fine, I was just objecting to anything ending in i.
--- End quote ---
Someone else hating on gnocchi? :-D
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version