Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT: Strips 2892 to 2896 (9th - 13th February 2015)
ReindeerFlotilla:
--- Quote from: DillyDolly on 08 Feb 2015, 22:41 ---Awwwwwww... They are so cute! But why—oh why—would she want to keep her specs on? Don't they get in the way of sexy moments? They are even invasive with simply snuggling! Plus she looks so beautiful without them. Don't get me wrong... I actually love glasses on people, but—dayam—those eyes!
--- End quote ---
Maybe she has a "being a sexy librarian" trope based fetish. Or maybe she's never had sex with her glasses on because until recently she'd never had sex. So she wants to give it a try.
Remember Rule 34. The reason for that rule is that if you can think of it, there's someone in the world gets off on it. (And if you manage to invent something totally new, the act of sharing will create the fetish.) Sex in glasses might not be for everyone. But the only way for Claire to find out if it's for her is to try.
Then deal with the smudges.
Baphomet:
--- Quote from: Carl-E on 08 Feb 2015, 22:42 ---I don't know/care what was involved in the process. It's the result that matters. That's why it's called "making love".
--- End quote ---
People who love each other can still pork, or bang, or fool around, or bone, or whatever. I don't think either the intent or the obvious meaning of what you're responding to demeaned the act in any way worth getting offended over. I obviously can't speak for you, but to me the term "making love" just seems so formal, almost to the point of being creepy.
Aziraphale:
--- Quote from: Baphomet on 08 Feb 2015, 23:07 ---
--- Quote from: Carl-E on 08 Feb 2015, 22:42 ---
--- Quote from: explicit on 08 Feb 2015, 22:03 ---
--- Quote from: Carl-E on 08 Feb 2015, 21:34 ---
--- Quote from: explicit on 08 Feb 2015, 19:36 ---They porked.
--- End quote ---
Really? Really??
This just... ugh.
OK, they may have had sex, but what Marten and Claire just did was make love.
Nothing less.
--- End quote ---
I was purposefully toning it down. Like if I won the Superbowl and just said, "this is neat". It's understatement.
"Fine, it's okay I GUESSSSSSSS" :-D
--- End quote ---
I wasn't commenting on your level of enthusiasm...
--- Quote from: SubaruStephen on 08 Feb 2015, 21:40 ---
--- Quote from: Carl-E on 08 Feb 2015, 21:34 --- what Marten and Claire just did was make love.
Nothing less.
--- End quote ---
How do you know? Were you in the room? For all we know, there actually could've been a badger, a kiddy pool full of Astroglide, and some Gonzo porn level acrobatics.
--- End quote ---
I don't know/care what was involved in the process. It's the result that matters. That's why it's called "making love".
--- End quote ---
People who love each other can still pork, or bang, or fool around, or bone, or whatever. I don't think either the intent or the obvious meaning of what you're responding to demeaned the act in any way worth getting offended over. I obviously can't speak for you, but to me the term "making love" just seems so formal, almost to the point of being creepy.
--- End quote ---
As long as the people on either end feel loved it doesn't matter if it's all scented candles and lovely music, or just a quickie.
Just my $.02 worth, mind you.
Is it cold in here?:
One girlfriend was in the habit of offering "intercourse", speaking of exceptional formality. The important thing was to oblige her, not to think about terminology.
Carl-E:
--- Quote from: Aziraphale on 08 Feb 2015, 23:12 ---As long as the people on either end feel loved it doesn't matter if it's all scented candles and lovely music, or just a quickie.
--- End quote ---
That was kind of my point. It doesn't matter what was actually involved. There's more there than the act(s), and that's what matters!
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version