Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT Strips 3016 to 3020 (3rd to 7th August 2015)
electromgneticDstroyosaur:
That's it? No concerns about the fact that half the rent now comes from dubious sources? I always though Marten was a bit too Lawful Good for this sort of thing to slide so easily. But I guess that's what living in a place like (this depiction of) Northampton does to a fellow.
anahata:
--- Quote from: electromgneticDstroyosaur on 07 Aug 2015, 00:13 ---No concerns about the fact that half the rent now comes from dubious sources?
--- End quote ---
He might come round to that, but actually it's Faye's problem, not his.
It's not like he's receiving stolen goods.
snubnose:
Since when is Marten lawful good ? I always thought he's clearly chaotic good ... like most people.
BenRG:
--- Quote from: electromgneticDstroyosaur on 07 Aug 2015, 00:13 ---That's it? No concerns about the fact that half the rent now comes from dubious sources?
--- End quote ---
Right now, I think he's too drained by the fact his personal reality won't settle down on 'normal' to worry about that.
FWIW, it is more likely that he would worry about Faye getting in trouble than the source of the money. He has struck me as knowing enough about AIs and how they live their lives to have confidence that, irrespective of the letter of the law, it would be nearly impossible to abuse them in this manner if they didn't want to be.
--- Quote from: anahata on 07 Aug 2015, 00:48 ---He might come round to that, but actually it's Faye's problem, not his.
It's not like he's receiving stolen goods.
--- End quote ---
Interestingly, at least in British law at least, it is the landlord's problem, not Marten's. If it is exposed that Faye's rent is coming from illegal sources, the landlord would be held responsible for not carrying out reasonable checks to verify that he was not receiving 'immoral earnings'.
Akima:
--- Quote from: BenRG on 07 Aug 2015, 01:25 ---If it is exposed that Faye's rent is coming from illegal sources, the landlord would be held responsible for not carrying out reasonable checks to verify that he was not receiving 'immoral earnings'.
--- End quote ---
Does that apply to earnings from any crime, or just prostitution?
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version