Comic Discussion > QUESTIONABLE CONTENT
WCDT 3611 to 3615 (13th to 17th November 2017)
DaiJB:
--- Quote from: Castlerook on 13 Nov 2017, 21:11 ---Nice to see Hanners going into passive aggressive mode for this.
--- End quote ---
Is this really passive-aggressive? A 93 minute bathing routine seems like just plain Hannelore to me :-D
But it seems (to me, at least) that Tilly couldn't give a damn what Hanners really wants - it would seem Hanners is just a mission objective on her radar...
(And I know I'm gonna get annoyed by that smug expression!)
Nycticoraci:
--- Quote from: brasca on 13 Nov 2017, 21:51 ---And 93 minutes to shower! I hope her father gave her some kind of space age hygienic chamber because that's a lot of water to be going through.
--- End quote ---
A 93 minute bathing process probably doesn't mean 93 minutes of continuous water usage. A sensible person turns things off while scrubbing then turns on to rinse etc. It probably also includes other elements of morning ablutions.
St.Clair:
and/or ablations...
exfoliations...
(etc, etc)
Nycticoraci:
--- Quote from: St.Clair on 13 Nov 2017, 22:23 ---and/or ablations...
exfoliations...
(etc, etc)
--- End quote ---
I hope not ablations. :-)
That is a rather more destructive process. Then again we have seen hanners scrub till she bleeds
tiercel:
Red flags:
“Hi! I’m nominally here to serve you but refuse to respect your express wishes except in way I deem fit for me!” Gets right up my nose; can understand this spawning passive-aggressive in response by calling her Taffy etc.
“Hi! I already have and am using a disturbing level of personal detail on you that most people might normally only entrust to a spouse/partner!” (Or at least Facebook?) Maybe I’m foolishly old fashioned, the way some people heedlessly share Every Life Detail online, but I find this repulsive and insulting.
“Hi! I’m here to work your mother’s will upon you!” Do I need to explain this one? Even in the best case scenario where this plot forces Hanners to sustain enough spine to either genuinely bend Taffy to her will or (in defiance of all comedic convention) actually dismiss this “loveably” whackadoodle intrusion, we still get a HannerMom steepled-fingers “Excellent-everything-is-proceeding-as-I-have-forseen” reaction shot.
And, possibly triggery: (click to show/hide)“Hi! I’m here to nonconsensually force my form of ‘professional’ intimacy upon you; for me, No Means Yes!” A number of people have commented on Taffy’s creepy persistence, and perhaps it is in part because of a possible perceived uncomfortable similarity to ... Unfortunate Implications. I am in no way saying anything like that is Taffy’s aim, but it’s easy to get hackles raised by innocent Hanners being creepy-insistent-wheedled by someone forcing attentions upon her.
Navigation
[0] Message Index
[#] Next page
[*] Previous page
Go to full version