The thing is, at this point it'd be nice to reccommend a few URLs and stuff, especially in light of Est's SG rant, but we have site rules about that sort of thing, apparently.
Regardless...
I don't know. At this point, I just don't like those close-ups of the penetration. I don't see how that could get anyone off.
I must confess, the one hardcore DVD I own is probably the least-viewed of the lot. It's terrible. There's not a single women who hasn't had silicone and bee venom shoved into her, every guy is some bodybuilder chump with sideburns and gold chains/earrings, and the male lead is probably one of the ugliest men alive, and I'm usually pretty adept at finding one attractive physical feature in anyone, regardless of gender, so believe me when I say that the man has no qualification to be an object of lust. Not to mention that the penetration close-ups just go on far too long for my tastes (seriously, fifteen minutes without changing the camera angle at all is just too long. A little bit, yes, but not a whole fucking quarter hour of fucking as seen from five centimetres away...)
It's not the PCU's themselves that are unattractive - tastefuly done, they rock, in fact. But unfortunately, they lose interest and become a bit too organic after a few seconds.
My cousin worked on a porno in sydney and from what he told me it was very professional and clinical. They had him checked and clean, he had to hand in a bunch of paperwork declaring him clean to work. It's no longer done in a back alley behind McDonalds, its shot like any other movie.
Unless, of course, the film includes a scene in the alley behind McDonalds. In which case there's probably an incongruously flash car and a dodgy use for a can of cooking fat involved, too.
