I'm currently reading The Decameron (or, more accurately, its introduction with the intention of THEN reading The Decameron), which thus far looks to be a collection of literary porn. Honestly, why must every commentator focus solely on the most controversial aspects of a text in place a round analysis of multiple facets? I'll EVENTUALLY get to the book itself. I doubt each and every story is a censored pit of vice.
I'm also plodding through Plato's Republic, skimming over key sections of Aquinas' Summa Theologica (damned logician-theologian), and have just finished The Odyssey. I've got bookmarks in a dozen more books I don't have proper time to READ, including Dune Messiah, The Tempest, The Care and Feeding of Books Old and New, On the Subjection of Women, The Name of the Rose, Walden, More About Paddington, Notes From Underground, Watership Down, and By the River Piedra I Sat Down and Wept.