THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: jwhouk on 02 Jan 2011, 04:26

Title: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 02 Jan 2011, 04:26
First of 2011. So many possibilities. Considering how we started last year (and how it ended), what could possibly go wrong this year?

 :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Border Reiver on 02 Jan 2011, 04:42
First, never ask that question unless you really want an answer.

Second, I may have the same expectation for this as for Girl Genius.

Says something for Jeph.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 02 Jan 2011, 06:03
Ah yes, 2010 started with Soda and some ear fucking and ended with Marten depressed and hanging out with his mother.

My predicition for 2011? Marten and Veronica buy a hotel, but Veronica is never seen again, save for a silhoutte sitting at the window in her rocking chair. Marten occasionally looks towards the window and mutters to himself about "Mother being unhappy". He eventually changes his name to Norman.

Elsewhere, Hanners has gotten so sick of the mess and dirt in Coffee of Doom that she takes the money to be laundered (literally). Realising that no company in the state will deal with her anymore, Hanners drives off and eventually stops at a certain hotel for the night.

Which leads to the climax of the story and a reunion in the shower, where "Norman" finds Hanners in a hazmat suit, scrubbing down the walls. After chatting for several hours over coffee, Marten explains he needed a new start, hence the name change. Veronica walks in and explains she isn't happy because her new book isn't selling as well as the autobiography. Hanners gets the money cleaned and brings it back to CoD.

Veronica ultimately gets back at Dora by having Pintsize sneak into her new place and hide under the floorboards and playing a random loop of prerecored soundbites of Marten's voice, slowly driving the ex-Goth insane with the guilt of breaking up the relationship.

Faye and Angus kiss again.

Steve, Cosette, Penny and Wil appear in the comic three times each.

Marigold completes the new Cataclysm zones and impatiently waits for the new patches to unlock new raids.

Sven takes over as the new leading angst filled character.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Near Lurker on 02 Jan 2011, 11:18
Second, I may have the same expectation for this as for Girl Genius.

You want Marten to lock down the friggin' castle already, then have a threesome with Faye and Dora?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: AnAverageWriter on 02 Jan 2011, 11:27
You want Marten to lock down the friggin' castle already, then have a threesome with Faye and Dora?

That...

Would...

BE AWESOME!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Carl-E on 02 Jan 2011, 11:30
Marigold completes the new Cataclysm zones and impatiently waits for Dale.

FYP

Seriously, I think that's going to develop some this year.  We'll get to watch Faye & Angus develop too, and the echoes of the Marten/Dora collapse will have some effect there.  Sven and Hanners will start hanging out together, just because he knows she's safe territory.  IF  something happens between them at all (like a chaste kiss on the forehead either way), there will be massive freakouts, but I think Hanner's life-coping tutor is going to shift away from Marten as she broadens her horizons (no, we're not talking Taco Bell yet). 

I'd like to see more of Penelope and Wil, too - things seem to be going fine, though and non-angst is boring.  Same with Steve and Cosette, but she's good for some occasional slapstick, so we'll see more of her than him. 

I'm most curious to see how Marten and Dora each are developed.  Just in the last few weeks, Jeph has created a timesharing problem for himself - as he focuses first on one then the other of them, the one not "on camera" fades from view.  I don't think he'd put either of them on a bus, but it's going to be an interesting balancing act to watch them deal with the fallout separately, with each other, and wthin their social circle. 

It's going to be an interesting year...

Oh, and this just in;  the following 11 consecutive prome number add up to...

157
163
167
173
179
181
191
193
197
199
211
2011

Happy new year!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: pwhodges on 02 Jan 2011, 14:23
You want Marten to lock down the friggin' castle already, then have a threesome with Faye and Dora?
That...
Would...
BE AWESOME!

Ahem!   Too far out of character: 600 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=600), 1039 (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1039).
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: kentriccubed on 02 Jan 2011, 14:34
My new years resolution was to finally post in the forums here rather than lurk, and to not worry so much over what Jeph is planning and just go with it.

Consequently I predict the usual drama, followed by some level of friendship restructuring. 
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 02 Jan 2011, 16:18
I voted for more Faye/Angus, but I'm also really looking forward to seeing Dora's therapy sessions, if Jeph shows them (which I hope he does); that would be very interesting, I think
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Near Lurker on 02 Jan 2011, 16:54
Ahem!   Too far out of character: 600 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=600), 1039 (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1039).

He doesn't have a castle, either.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 02 Jan 2011, 18:35
Jeph could put Dora "on a bus", but it'd be difficult as all get-out.

I think we actually talked a bit about that in the Thread That Must Not Be Named. Writing Dora out would require someone to take over CoD (Sven and/or Hanners would be the only likely pair), or have CoD eliminated from the QCverse by an Act of God (or Cosette).

The problem with the first would be how to send Dora off to oblivion. He could go all Teh Dramaz with a Suicide Attempt, but that would be too much for Faye to handle. Dora could also do a Raven and go back to school for a business degree, but I don't think that would be "in character" for her.

The problem with the second is that eliminating CoD wouldn't necessarily eliminate Dora, but it would affect pretty much the entire cast. Faye, Penelope, Cosette and Hannelore would lose their jobs; Dora probably wouldn't be in a very good frame of mind (though it would definitely be cause for a suicide attempt, but it'd essentially put her emotionally where Faye was right before the strip began).

Only thing I can think of is that I'm glad that I'm not the one who has to figure out how to balance CoD and Dora with Marten and the rest of the cast.

EDIT: Oh, and:
Ahem!   Too far out of character: 600 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=600), 1039 (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1039).

He doesn't have a castle, either.
Congratulations, you win a million Moxanna points. ;)
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Sharp on 02 Jan 2011, 19:49
I'm looking forward to more Faye/Angus, Marten getting out of his rut, and HOPEFULLY another time-skip. Jeph has pulled it off with success before, and I think that as long as he ties up all the immediate loose ends, he could do it with little fanfare in order to help keep things exciting.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 02 Jan 2011, 20:01
If he wanted to make things really exciting, he could do the time skip very subtly like before, but the "future" we get skipped to is a post-apocalyptic North Hampton with every citizen fending for themselves and the gang trying to survive as best they can. Dora has turned the shop into a saloon and now has an eyepatch. Nobody explains what happened or exactly how much time has passed.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: ysth on 02 Jan 2011, 20:10
You're either on the bus or you're off the bus.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 02 Jan 2011, 21:50
Or the bus runs you over.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 02 Jan 2011, 21:54
Or your coat gets caught on the door of the bus and you're dragged alongside the bus for several miles...
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: akronnick on 02 Jan 2011, 21:58
Sometimes you ride the bus, sometimes the bus rides you...






Wait, what?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: snubnose on 02 Jan 2011, 23:56
Moa Hanners plz  :angel:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Sharp on 03 Jan 2011, 00:25
Haha! Veronica definately knows how to work her enemies!  :evil:

But it looks like Marten's hit his last straw, will we FINALLY get some advancement with Marten? Don't make me beg.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: akronnick on 03 Jan 2011, 00:26
And the hits just keep on coming...


It's official.

I no longer like Marten's mom.

Everyone knows Sven is hot, you don't need to comment, especially with Marten right there.

Not cool.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: LordVaughn on 03 Jan 2011, 00:27
Warning - while you were reading 2 new replies have been posted. You may wish to review your post.
First time it's happened.

Anyways, I almost wondered how that meeting would go when I saw it on the stream.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: snubnose on 03 Jan 2011, 00:28
LOL :-D

Apparently Martens Mom has no problem getting younger men.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Mojo on 03 Jan 2011, 00:31
Ok, why would it be wrong, based on her age (the theory of relativity prevents her seducing him for other, more salient reasons)?  I'm in my 40s now, and I'm constantly being hit on and flirted with by 20-30 year-olds.  Of course, I don't date any of them, but why would it be wrong if I did (or Veronica did with Sven)?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: LordVaughn on 03 Jan 2011, 00:39
Mojo, it's wrong because not only would she dating the brother of her son's ex, but probably might even send Dora over the edge, seeing how it would be not only someone she has admitted to masturbating to, having sex with Sven but the mother of her ex. There's a complicated rule somewhere, I know it.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Sorflakne on 03 Jan 2011, 00:42
Quote
Sometimes you ride the bus, sometimes the bus rides you...


Wait, what?
Some days you're the monkey, some days you're the football.




Man, here I thought Veronica was going to break Sven's wrist after seeing panel 3b, until I scrolled down.

I guess her and Sven hooking up would be a great way to fuck with Dora...Sven always hooking up with the girls (which used to piss Dora off), his newest catch happening to be Dora's former favorite fetish model (and 'getting off' source) who also just happens to be the mother of her ex-boyfriend...yeah, mindfuck indeed.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Skelepunk on 03 Jan 2011, 00:52
If I were Marten, that's exactly where I'd go, too. When in doubt, nap.
As for Mrs.Reed, although it was tactless, I cannot help but love those types of statements that point out the obvious like that. That being said, it was a bad call on her part.
 
Mojo, it's wrong because not only would she dating the brother of her son's ex, but probably might even send Dora over the edge, seeing how it would be not only someone she has admitted to masturbating to, having sex with Sven but the mother of her ex. There's a complicated rule somewhere, I know it.
I think the rule you are looking for is rudeness. I think it would be impolite for Marten's mom to sleep with her son's ex's brother.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: akronnick on 03 Jan 2011, 00:57
Ok, why would it be wrong, based on her age (the theory of relativity prevents her seducing him for other, more salient reasons)?  I'm in my 40s now, and I'm constantly being hit on and flirted with by 20-30 year-olds.  Of course, I don't date any of them, but why would it be wrong if I did (or Veronica did with Sven)?

It has absolutely nothing to do with age.

Certain persons who are related to certain other persons shall forever remain persona-non-nooki for the first person.

Otherwise it just gets wierd.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: westrim on 03 Jan 2011, 01:04
I guess Sven hasn't changed after all; it looks like he's still into whores.  :angel:

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Akima on 03 Jan 2011, 01:10
I can't see Hanners' Mum being sexually kinky somehow. For her, I think, it's all about power. And wood-chippers... (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=994)

The expression on Marten's Mum's face in panel three is brilliant. Art-kudos to Jeph. Also, the magazine Sven is reading...
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Blackjoker on 03 Jan 2011, 01:29
I fear the day that Martens dam bursts, when it does..the horror, the horror.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Delator on 03 Jan 2011, 02:09
The beat panel made me laugh harder than anything else.  :-P
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: cyro on 03 Jan 2011, 02:19
It's strips like this where I miss the old Sven.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 03 Jan 2011, 02:39
I'm getting quite curious about Dora, being as she hasn't made an appearance in nearly 20 episodes.

In the meantime, I'd quite like to see another excursion out of Northampton like we did with Faye. Something like a Marten & Tai roadtrip could be entertaining, getting to see characters operating out of their sphere of familiarity.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: westrim on 03 Jan 2011, 02:42
I'm getting quite curious about Dora, being as she hasn't made an appearance in nearly 20 episodes.

In the meantime, I'd quite like to see another excursion out of Northampton like we did with Faye. Something like a Marten & Tai roadtrip could be entertaining, getting to see characters operating out of their sphere of familiarity.
episodes  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Kyronea on 03 Jan 2011, 03:08
I HAVE LURKED LONG ENOUGH.

So anyway, am I the only one mildly disappointed that we didn't get to see Sven tied up?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 03 Jan 2011, 03:08
an incident, scene, etc., within a narrative, usually fully developed and either integrated within the main story or digressing from it.

Seems to reasonably describe each new day, strip or page of QC that gets published. Why do you feel that it's inappropriate?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: snubnose on 03 Jan 2011, 03:16
I still cant make up my mind if Sven's book reads

"Politically correct whore"

or

"Personal computer whore".

Possibly "man whore" instead of just "whore", the "man" part would be hidden.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: westrim on 03 Jan 2011, 03:44
an incident, scene, etc., within a narrative, usually fully developed and either integrated within the main story or digressing from it.

Seems to reasonably describe each new day, strip or page of QC that gets published. Why do you feel that it's inappropriate?
Because there's only one at most to me- Marten meets his mom. That sense of the word is loose, of course, but 20 strips =/= 20 episodes just because they all end with puns. They're still the same scene/event/quantum entanglement. When you're talking about 20 strips, say 20 strips, don't use an inherently ambiguous term.

I have no observational/analytical skills.

The computer tower on the cover is a pretty solid indicator of the second choice.

Also, it's a magazine.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 03 Jan 2011, 03:54
Because there's only one at most to me- Marten meets his mom. That sense of the word is loose, of course, but 20 strips =/= 20 episodes just because they all end with puns. They're still the same scene/event/quantum entanglement. When you're talking about 20 strips, say 20 strips, don't use an inherently ambiguous term.

I see nothing ambiguous about the word episode in the context that I used it. To me, Marten meeting his mum is either a chapter or a story arc. I also don't see ending in a pun having anything to do with the classification of an episode.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: snubnose on 03 Jan 2011, 04:50
The computer tower on the cover is a pretty solid indicator of the second choice.

Also, it's a magazine.
Uh, I cant see any computer tower on the cover, but thanks.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: pwhodges on 03 Jan 2011, 04:54
A couple of CD drives and an indicator light beneath - looks pretty like the top half of a computer tower to me.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: IlGreven on 03 Jan 2011, 05:12
You want Marten to lock down the friggin' castle already, then have a threesome with Faye and Dora?
That...
Would...
BE AWESOME!

Ahem!   Too far out of character: 600 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=600), 1039 (http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=1039).

Well, some would say Angry!Marten is too far out of character, too, yet it's happening.  He's gonna explode on someone, and then everything will be coated in the shit furnished by the fan.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Somnus Eternus on 03 Jan 2011, 05:38
Yes, Marten, go on and go back to bed.  When you wake up, it will have all been just a dream...

...except that doesn't really work and your mom'll just find more embarrassing pictures of you or, failing that, tell some really embarrassing stories about your childhood.  Oh, Mom.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 03 Jan 2011, 06:21
That would be the ultimate "get back at your ex" move in the history of "get back of your exes".

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 03 Jan 2011, 06:29
I can hear the tell-tale pings of someone about to snap...

And I'm guessing so can Hanners and Tai in that last panel...

And does it look like Tai is trying to be supportive of Marten or trying to keep him from walking away by holding his wrist?

And poor show Veronica, poor show.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 03 Jan 2011, 06:32
My question is, why did Sven steal that Nehru jacket out of his dad's closet?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: philharmonic on 03 Jan 2011, 06:33
Aside from the possibility of Martin meeting someone new, I was thinking Tai looks to be getting closer. Maybe its just a Onii chan thing. Oh and
HAPPY NEW YEAR BITCHES !!!!!!

ok i go back to lurking again for a few months
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Border Reiver on 03 Jan 2011, 07:54
She's just keeping him with the group, maybe offering a little support.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 03 Jan 2011, 08:18
Mindfucking Dora is just one of the many reasons Sven might not want to sleep with Veronica....
 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=436) (to be more specific, Veronica's line in the first panel of linked comic)
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Wiregeek on 03 Jan 2011, 08:46
Mrs. Robinson, Jesus Loves you!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: themacnut on 03 Jan 2011, 08:52
That would be the ultimate "get back at your ex" move in the history of "get back of your exes".

Except it's a move Marten seems to want no part of. But since he thinks he has no say in whether or not it happens, he's decided to bail.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: steveb on 03 Jan 2011, 09:03
He's gonna explode on someone, and then everything will be coated in the shit furnished by the fan.

Actually I don't think he will explode. Marten in obviously not a very happy bunny at the moment but his
reaction is to just go have a time out. Veronica is not helping at all but the current strips are showing us what
martin's teenage years must have been like! He does not like his life at the moment, and he has shown us that he
is not prepared to put up with stuff forever, but I think ultimately having Veronica as a mother must have made him able to
cope with almost anything.

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: themacnut on 03 Jan 2011, 09:28
Not sure I agree with the "cope with almost anything" part. After all, Marten could have had much worse for a mother. She could've been an alcoholic, drug addict or just insane. I've known people with such mothers, and you wonder how they retain their sanity (and all too often they don't). As it is, Marten's mother is just a bit eccentric an a bit overenthusiastic in trying to cheer her son up.

Of course, I'm sure he doesn't feel all that "lucky" in the kind of mom he has right now...
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Near Lurker on 03 Jan 2011, 09:37
Mindfucking Dora is just one of the many reasons Sven might not want to sleep with Veronica....
 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=436) (to be more specific, Veronica's line in the first panel of linked comic)

Never stopped Marten.

And you'd think Sven would have recognized her...
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: cuzsis on 03 Jan 2011, 10:33
 At first I thought Veronica was going to kill Sven or something (based on what she said to Faye back in the day)

 Then I realized she was just turned on (which seems entirely reasonable for her character)

 She made a quip about it (also reasonable)

 And Sven agreed, though not with his former "lady-man" style that he used to have back when he was a womanizer. This time he was just mildly turned off. And that was a bit odd to see. Not out of character or anything, just odd to me.

 Marten should know better than to take her overly seriously right now anyway. She's staying pretty light about everything. Which is good.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: AnAverageWriter on 03 Jan 2011, 10:40
Actually I don't think he will explode. Marten in obviously not a very happy bunny at the moment but his
reaction is to just go have a time out.

Exactly. For as long as I've been reading these strips and reading the forums, people keep responding to drama with "Martin is going to snap in 3... 2... 1..."

And it doesn't happen.

Why do posters keep assuming that Martin is a pent up ball of rage,  a bomb that's going to just explode? That's not who Martin is. He is not going to "blow up", people! If things get too horrid, his ultimate reaction is to vanish into his room. That's as bad as that bad-boy gets, folks.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Mustakyy on 03 Jan 2011, 12:44
Marten flipping out over this? After keeping cool over WAY worse stuff than this? Somehow, don't see it happening.

Something like "Meh, im way too hung over for this, gotta bail"  or "God damn it, Mom"  would be more appropriate response when minding the situation and Martens usual behaviour.
(thou my guesses have been less than accurate lately  :-D)

It also seems that Hanners and Tai are a bit concerned about his reaction to this situation (which, imho, became WAY uncool with a couple of poorly chosen words, especially when looking at the situation at hand)
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Kugai on 03 Jan 2011, 12:52
Lesseeeee

We've still got Steve, PenPen, Angus and Marigold to go.


Definite Mattensplosion possible.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Mr_Rose on 03 Jan 2011, 13:19
And the hits just keep on coming...


It's official.

I no longer like Marten's mom.

Everyone knows Sven is hot, you don't need to comment, especially with Marten right there.

Not cool.
Why? It's not like Marten just broke up with him. Or that Veronica knew he was related to Dora until he told her.
Heck, I don't think Miss Reed even knew Dora had any siblings, never mind a half-brother that looks nothing like her.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 03 Jan 2011, 14:09
Why? It's not like Marten just broke up with him. Or that Veronica knew he was related to Dora until he told her.
Heck, I don't think Miss Reed even knew Dora had any siblings, never mind a half-brother that looks nothing like her.

Errrr....How is Sven Dora's half brother when they both have the same parents?

And the problem is that Veronica is flirting with a guy she had just literally met right there, when she had gone there to supposedly comfort her only son and child. Only to Marten its just the latest entry in a long day of humiliation. And what some people tend to forget is that while it might be two months for us since Dora and Marten broke up, its only been two days for Marten, and right now his mother is contemplating sleeping with Sven.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Heliphyneau on 03 Jan 2011, 14:35
And does it look like Tai is trying to be supportive of Marten or trying to keep him from walking away by holding his wrist?

Bit of both, I think.  Interesting how much more perceptive and attuned to Marten's feelings both Tai and Hanners are compared with his Mom.  Ms. Reed seems both tactless and easily distracted.

And you'd think Sven would have recognized her...

There may be a bit of dawning recognition on his face in panel 2 -- maybe he's fully aware of who she is, since odds are Dora would have told him (possibly back when she met her the first time), or maybe he's just thinking, 'hmm, she looks familiar somehow . . .'  I very much enjoy Sven's placid response in the final panel.   :-D
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 03 Jan 2011, 14:55
It's also possible that Marten has told his mom who Sven is, as well. Ergo the response.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Mad Cat on 03 Jan 2011, 16:14
"Personal computer whore"
It has a sister publication: "Mac Prostitute"
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: hannahsaurusrex on 03 Jan 2011, 16:39
Veronica Reed, BAD FORM!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: westrim on 03 Jan 2011, 16:59
"Personal computer whore"
It has a sister publication: "Mac Prostitute"
And of course there's the brother publication, "Linux Gigolo".
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 03 Jan 2011, 18:19
Maybe the best thing Martenmom can do is to be herself, giving Marten a familiar reference point of stability.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: akronnick on 03 Jan 2011, 19:11
Because Marten would not know how to function at all unless he's being mistreated by a skinny dark haired woman...
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 03 Jan 2011, 19:18
Niiiice.  :laugh:

Jeph's building us up for the big finish where Mom and Dora meet by accident... and we're left with a cliffhanger over the weekend.

And you wanna bet that Faye hasn't told Dora who's in town just yet?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 03 Jan 2011, 19:20
Because Marten would not know how to function at all unless he's being mistreated by a skinny dark haired woman...

That's not entirely fair. He can function just fine while being mistreated by curvy dark-haired women, too  :wink:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Kugai on 03 Jan 2011, 19:22
At this rate, Marten will e running away to join a Zen Monastery.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 03 Jan 2011, 19:25
They won't let him in after what he did with the Ninja Monks back in 697. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=697)
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 03 Jan 2011, 20:06
Although that one did ask him if he'd considered a career as an evil henchmen. If Marten goes over to the dark side.....
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 03 Jan 2011, 20:16
Hannelore wouldn't let him. She'd go postal on him.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: akronnick on 03 Jan 2011, 20:19
That's not entirely fair. He can function just fine while being mistreated by curvy dark-haired women, too  :wink:

Yes that is correct. I should have counted Faye as well.

I wonder if he can survive on mistreatment from a blond if all else fails...

This may require aditional research. :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 03 Jan 2011, 20:25
You could say that he already has, since Dora's a natural blond  :-D


Hannelore wouldn't let him. She'd go postal on him.

Hannelore also has potential for the dark side. She will join us or die.

/vader
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 03 Jan 2011, 20:29
One of Jeph's latest tweets;

"Script's done, hee hee, oh hee hee "

We're either going to see some more MartenMom hilarity, or the shit is about to hit the fan....

I'm guessing the latter and Faye lets slip about who is in town when she returns from her lunch break.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 03 Jan 2011, 20:55
I'll bet she hears it from either Penelope or Cosette.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Sharp on 03 Jan 2011, 21:18
Mindfucking Dora is just one of the many reasons Sven might not want to sleep with Veronica....
 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=436) (to be more specific, Veronica's line in the first panel of linked comic)

Dear Sweet Buddha...when you put it in THAT context...with how similar they look... :psyduck: Dora would probably call to the therapist and schedule an emergency appointment!

in short: You are an evil, evil man Dug.


Why do posters keep assuming that Martin is a pent up ball of rage,  a bomb that's going to just explode? That's not who Martin is. He is not going to "blow up", people! If things get too horrid, his ultimate reaction is to vanish into his room. That's as bad as that bad-boy gets, folks.

I think, and this is just my armchair analysis, that some of us are doing what we do best: projecting. I admit that I share a lot of traits with Marten, so I identify with him. And in my opinion, Marten seems like the kind of person who bottles up his emotions until they lash out when the bottle fills up. Some people can bottle up months of stress before lashing out in a very short, but very irrational and intense burst of anger. I want to see Marten flip out because thats what I expect him to do. That's what I expect I'd do in the same situation. I do however, hope that it happens in the right place, at the right time, whenever/wherever that may be. (Oh yeah, and that it doesn't hurt anyone too bad! I still like everyone too much to see anyone permanantly changed!)
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: CEOIII on 03 Jan 2011, 21:32
Who is the "she" Veronica is talking about in the first panel?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 03 Jan 2011, 21:43
Who is the "she" Veronica is talking about in the first panel?

Hanner's mom.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 03 Jan 2011, 21:55
Otherwise known as Beatrice Chatham, by the way.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 03 Jan 2011, 22:25
Mindfucking Dora is just one of the many reasons Sven might not want to sleep with Veronica....
 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=436) (to be more specific, Veronica's line in the first panel of linked comic)

Dear Sweet Buddha...when you put it in THAT context...with how similar they look... :psyduck: Dora would probably call to the therapist and schedule an emergency appointment!

in short: You are an evil, evil man Dug.


*tilks cowboy hat* You mean "evil, evil lady." *spits into spittoon* *walks out of the saloon*




I don't know. Anyway, I'm a woman.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Kugai on 03 Jan 2011, 22:43
Mindfucking Dora is just one of the many reasons Sven might not want to sleep with Veronica....
 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=436) (to be more specific, Veronica's line in the first panel of linked comic)

Dear Sweet Buddha...when you put it in THAT context...with how similar they look... :psyduck: Dora would probably call to the therapist and schedule an emergency appointment!

in short: You are an evil, evil man Dug.


*tilks cowboy hat* You mean "evil, evil lady." *spits into spittoon* *walks out of the saloon*




I don't know. Anyway, I'm a woman.


Why is it I suddenly hear music from a Sergio Leone movie?

 :-D
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: PureLionHeart on 03 Jan 2011, 22:46
At long last! :D
Tomorrow can't come fast enough.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: CompSarge on 03 Jan 2011, 22:47
Ze plot, eet theeckens!  :psyduck:

Marten's mom doesn't look very angry in this comic, even though she's going to see Dora. Could this mean that she's not going to visit horrible retribution on Dora for hurting Marten?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Kugai on 03 Jan 2011, 22:51
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh  shit


*Dramatic sustained Violin note*
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: LordVaughn on 03 Jan 2011, 22:51
Poor Dora. Then again, if I were in her shoes, I'd probably be hiding too.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Near Lurker on 03 Jan 2011, 22:52
Uu Kanata, nangmini nunavut, piqujatii nalattiaqpavut...

Makes me wonder about Penelope's taste in decor.  Still, though, I'm wondering just what she plans to do here, assuming she's not actually planning to kill Dora.  That would kind of ruin Faye's suggestion of therapy, wouldn't it?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: cherrypi on 03 Jan 2011, 22:55
Ze plot, eet theeckens!  :psyduck:

Marten's mom doesn't look very angry in this comic, even though she's going to see Dora. Could this mean that she's not going to visit horrible retribution on Dora for hurting Marten?

I was thinking the same myself. She almost looks...sad? Or at least concerned. Hmmm. I wonder what the point of this visit will be...
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: akronnick on 03 Jan 2011, 22:55
Captain, I'm detecting a Bird of Prey decloaking off the port bow!

SHIELDS UP!!!

***** YELLOW ALERT ***** YELLOW ALERT ***** YELLOW ALERT
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Kugai on 03 Jan 2011, 23:01
That all depends on whether she intends going B'Elanna on Dora's ass.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Sorflakne on 03 Jan 2011, 23:03
Yep, Pen-Pen is officially fired for that little stunt.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 03 Jan 2011, 23:04
"You, young lady, hurt my son. You must make amends, or I will inflict incredible pain and suffering on you."

"Like what?"

"Like this."

(Shows her Sven's phone number on a slip of paper)

The scream will be heard for miles.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 03 Jan 2011, 23:05
Yep, Pen-Pen is officially fired for that little stunt.

No she won't. They'll never find the body.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 03 Jan 2011, 23:05
Does this all seem a little familiar (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1179), Dora?

And, jwhouk? That would be aweome  :laugh:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 03 Jan 2011, 23:06
I'd bet that Faye actually suggested that (pointing that she's hiding under the counter) to Penelope.

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: no one special on 03 Jan 2011, 23:25
 My opinion?  The call was from... Sven.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: akronnick on 03 Jan 2011, 23:27
That all depends on whether she intends going B'Elanna on Dora's ass.

That's why I called a yellow alert.

If there were indications that her intentions were hostile, it would have been red!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: chrisa1 on 03 Jan 2011, 23:40
Question: who *did* place the call to Marten's mom? From the dialog, I can't tell if Dora herself placed the call, telling Pen to give Mrs. Reed a fake message ("Dora moved to Canada"), or if Pen called on her own and Dora tried to coach her during the call.

 :?

And maybe my experience is less the rule, but when I went through breakups, I never saw my ex again, let alone any of her family.

Still on-thread, I think Tai is hanging on to Marten's wrist in 1831 to keep him from leaving.

Slightly off-topic, I'm always voting for more Pintsize. The ongoing drama is OK, but sometimes I miss the days of completely random and entertaining dialog (hanging out at CoD or someone's apartment with minimal continuity).
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: chrisa1 on 03 Jan 2011, 23:45
Ze plot, eet theeckens!  :psyduck:

Marten's mom doesn't look very angry in this comic, even though she's going to see Dora. Could this mean that she's not going to visit horrible retribution on Dora for hurting Marten?

idk, obviously Mrs. Reed *has* had serious relationships that involved... well, marriage. But she seems to be someone who is more casual with relationships generally. Maybe she just wants to see where Dora is in all this. Not to mention that I don't recall she even *knows* Dora very well, having only met her in a brief arc back in the 600's somewhere...?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Skelepunk on 03 Jan 2011, 23:46
Captain, I'm detecting a Bird of Prey decloaking off the port bow!

SHIELDS UP!!!

***** YELLOW ALERT ***** YELLOW ALERT ***** YELLOW ALERT
QC, now with 20% more Star Trek references.
Comic wise, this is a curious development, one I was not actually expecting. I can't see Mrs. Reed making threats, but I am curious to see how this develops.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 03 Jan 2011, 23:46
It's quite possible she faked the call. Could've said her phone was on vibrate. Note how she's looking back in the restauant in panel 2 like she's making sure no one sees what she's doing.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: chrisa1 on 03 Jan 2011, 23:49
Ohhhhhhhhhhhhhhh  shit


*Dramatic sustained Violin note*

Off-topic, drama is indicated by a sustained diminished 7th chord, used in musical accompaniments to melodrama since time immemorial.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 03 Jan 2011, 23:51
Yeah, I'm pretty sure she faked the call. Note the phone's not vibrating or making any sort of tone.

That's not the funny part. The funny part is "I TOLD YOU TO SAY I WAS IN CANADA". 

:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: ZERO on 03 Jan 2011, 23:56
It would be funny if tomorrow there was a Yelling Bird strip. Everyone would be pissed.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: snubnose on 04 Jan 2011, 00:03
Yay, Comic !

It would be funny if tomorrow there was a Yelling Bird strip. Everyone would be pissed.
Except you, apparently.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: ZERO on 04 Jan 2011, 00:06
It would be funny if tomorrow there was a Yelling Bird strip. Everyone would be pissed.
Except you, apparently.

NOT TRUE!!! <_<

...or is it? >_>
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: pwhodges on 04 Jan 2011, 00:07
Jeph has only done that without an obvious reason when ill, which naturally would not be funny.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Deadlywonky on 04 Jan 2011, 00:21
Slightly off-topic, I'm always voting for more Pintsize. The ongoing drama is OK, but sometimes I miss the days of completely random and entertaining dialog (hanging out at CoD or someone's apartment with minimal continuity).

I too enjoy the above style of comic (hi-jinks etc,) but when Jeph is writing these story arc comics i find myself getting so impatient and yearning for the next step in the story. Overall i think that the comic will be much the poorer if storylines like the current one are not developed to allow space for "MOAR PINTSIZE!"

others may well feel differently.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Sorflakne on 04 Jan 2011, 00:23
Jeph has only done that without an obvious reason when ill, which naturally would not be funny.
No, I can actually see a Yelling Bird strip tomorrow:

-Yelling Bird (YB): ALL YOU FUCKS THOUGHT THERE'D BE A SMACKDOWN BETWEEN VERONICA AND DORA, DIDN'T YOU?  MAYBE THE WISHY-WASHY PANSIES AMONG YOU WANTED SOME SPECULATION FROM BITCHBOY MARTEN'S FRIENDS AS TO VERONICA'S PHONE CALL.

-YB: WELL I'M HERE TO TELL YOU EXACTLY WHAT HAPPEN-
-Randi: Hi, I'm Randi!  I'm a bandicoot!

-YB: GOD FUCKING DAMMIT!  WHERE THE HELL DID YOU COME FROM?
-Randi: Australia!  I'm a bandicoot!

-YB: I FUCKING KNOW WHERE BANDICOOTS ARE FROM!  I THOUGHT I BANISHED YOU INTO AZATHOTH'S ASS!

Randi (glowy red eyes and guttural voice): Azathoth is now my little bitch.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Akima on 04 Jan 2011, 00:33
It's quite possible she faked the call. Could've said her phone was on vibrate. Note how she's looking back in the restauant in panel 2 like she's making sure no one sees what she's doing.
Hmmm... Vibrate usually isn't inaudible, especially at close range. If I'd been doing it... I'd have set up a script, run from cron (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cron), to send a text to my phone, and set the alert tone to be the same as my ring-tone. Or, better and more flexible, set things up so that she could send a text to a suitable address, that would trigger a message back to her after a delay. Or, if she's got a suitable phone (and it certainly looks big enough), just write an app to sound the ring-tone after a suitable delay.

What?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: xerada on 04 Jan 2011, 00:37
Hm. Or her phone has a "fake call" option. My phone does, and it's a really, really cheap mobile.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Akima on 04 Jan 2011, 00:49
Hm. Or her phone has a "fake call" option. My phone does, and it's a really, really cheap mobile.
Is it a Samsung? After I made my post above, I googled "fake call app" and there are many available. Obviously it is a feature much in demand. Years ago, I recall a Dilbert strip in which Wally had built a fake pager to get him out of meetings, conversations, work etc. Life imitates art.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: cesariojpn on 04 Jan 2011, 01:00
Marten's mom doesn't look very angry in this comic, even though she's going to see Dora. Could this mean that she's not going to visit horrible retribution on Dora for hurting Marten?

I was expecting a Bullwhip or a Japanese Clovers.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: xerada on 04 Jan 2011, 01:02
Akima: Yap, it is :) You even can record a fake message that is played as soon as you "pick up" the phone
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: akronnick on 04 Jan 2011, 01:12

...just write an app to sound the ring-tone after a suitable delay.


What if her phone had a function to ring at a pre-determined time.

Like maybe an "alarm" function?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Arancaytar on 04 Jan 2011, 01:47
Ouch, I hope Mrs. Reed listened to her son and doesn't make with the murdering. She already got the others in the restaurant to provide her with a giant seabird (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=471).  :lol:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: westrim on 04 Jan 2011, 02:01
Hm. Or her phone has a "fake call" option. My phone does, and it's a really, really cheap mobile.
Is it a Samsung? After I made my post above, I googled "fake call app" and there are many available. Obviously it is a feature much in demand. Years ago, I recall a Dilbert strip in which Wally had built a fake pager to get him out of meetings, conversations, work etc. Life imitates art.

Oh god, I actually remember pagers, or at least the commercials as they tried to stay relevant. Damn I feel old now, and I'm 21.  :mrgreen:  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 04 Jan 2011, 03:06
Hooray! Penny uses her BLUH BLUH HUGE BITCH abilities for a good cause!

Veronica looks more...bothered and unsteady than predatory, though.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: PureLionHeart on 04 Jan 2011, 03:11
Ze plot, eet theeckens!  :psyduck:

Marten's mom doesn't look very angry in this comic, even though she's going to see Dora. Could this mean that she's not going to visit horrible retribution on Dora for hurting Marten?

Clearly she plans to lull her into a false sense of security.
Devious!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Skewbrow on 04 Jan 2011, 03:33

Veronica looks more...bothered and unsteady than predatory, though.

Quite. Could it be that she simply wants to hear Dora's side of the story? So that she gets a better understanding on what went wrong. And may then be better placed to help her son?

I don't know how much useful information she could get from Dora during "a phone call" though?

What if... she wants to make a desperate attempt at patching things up?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: westrim on 04 Jan 2011, 03:34
Ze plot, eet theeckens!  :psyduck:

Marten's mom doesn't look very angry in this comic, even though she's going to see Dora. Could this mean that she's not going to visit horrible retribution on Dora for hurting Marten?

Clearly she plans to lull her into a false sense of security.
Devious!

Dora: "Wait... you aren't here to kill me?"
Martymom: Don't be silly, of course I am dear! *stab*
Dora: "How did you get... the broooadswoooord...*dies*"

Then Veronica has an epic battle with Penny for the honor of CoD. Skillets, spatulas, and swords flash, but only one will be victorious.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Border Reiver on 04 Jan 2011, 04:26
Yeah, I'm pretty sure she faked the call. Note the phone's not vibrating or making any sort of tone.

That's not the funny part. The funny part is "I TOLD YOU TO SAY I WAS IN CANADA". 

:-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D

By the way - the weather's good up here in the nation's capital
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Akima on 04 Jan 2011, 04:30
Like maybe an "alarm" function?
LOL! Yeah... I've never used my alarm function to play anything other than a loud beeping, but on inspection I find it can be set to play a ring-tone, so...  :-P
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: TadPrime on 04 Jan 2011, 04:38
Quite. Could it be that she simply wants to hear Dora's side of the story? So that she gets a better understanding on what went wrong. And may then be better placed to help her son?

Certainly possible, she is one of the more... stable... characters in the story.  But I have to admit the first impression in my head included the Mortal Combat theme...   :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Zer0th on 04 Jan 2011, 04:58
I still remember Veronica saying to Faye (not Dora, thanks to pwhodges) 
that she will introduce her in to a new realm of pain and suffering.
Go to http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=459

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Loki on 04 Jan 2011, 04:59
"You, young lady, hurt my son. You must make amends, or I will inflict incredible pain and suffering on you."
'Ello. My name is Veronica Reed. You hurt my son. Prepare to die.

I hope we get to see some fighting like this (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1485).
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: pwhodges on 04 Jan 2011, 05:03
I still remember Veronica saying to Dora that she will introduce
her in to a new realm of pain and suffering.

Except, of course, she said it to Faye, not Dora.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Zer0th on 04 Jan 2011, 05:05
I still remember Veronica saying to Dora that she will introduce
her in to a new realm of pain and suffering.

Except, of course, she said it to Faye, not Dora.

Uh yeah, you're right. I will correct it. Thanks.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: StevenC on 04 Jan 2011, 07:27
Well here I am, thinking Ms. Reed has a dastardly plan that's about to unfold, and then she just walks over to CoD.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: snubnose on 04 Jan 2011, 07:38
Waffles win.

Why do Waffles win ?


Well here I am, thinking Ms. Reed has a dastardly plan that's about to unfold, and then she just walks over to CoD.
I was as surprised as you.

Doras reaction was fun though.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Border Reiver on 04 Jan 2011, 08:12
Waffles win.

Why do Waffles win ?



They can retain more maple syrup than simple pancakes - do you really need more reasons?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: DSL on 04 Jan 2011, 08:41
Maybe Veronica just has a business proposition for Dora.
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=975
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 04 Jan 2011, 08:48
There was a coffee shop in Endell Street in London that was called Coffee, Cake & Kink. I heard it did well for a few years but I don't think it was there the last time I was passing so don't know what happened to it. I'm definitely not googling that from work.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Skelepunk on 04 Jan 2011, 09:43
The website's still up, and it says it will be back soon in central London. Take that as you will.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: MightionNY on 04 Jan 2011, 12:25
My first thought when read today's strip?

"Yay! Penelope!"

...followed closely by "Here we go...", but then I looked at Veronica's demeanor in this strip, and realized it's highly unlikely we're going to see Dora chained to a wall, covered in bruises and beat to heck, with Veronica standing nearby, in full regalia, brandishing a bullwhip with a frayed tip as well as a look of righteous murderous rage screaming "BABY BEGS NOW!!!"...

...at least not before Friday.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Kugai on 04 Jan 2011, 12:53
Maybe Veronica just has a business proposition for Dora.
http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=975

Well, a name change would be in order.

Coffee of Dominance?


Tun By Mistress Dora and her co-Mistress Faye with their 'Pets' Penelope, Cosette Hannelore and Marigold

 :-D


Hmmmmmmm


Marigold would look good in a collar - so would Hanners.


*Walks off whistling innocently*
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Border Reiver on 04 Jan 2011, 13:02
While everyone is seemingly expecting massive violence and/or somthing related to Ms Reed's dayjob, I'm anticipating a nice rational discussion (with some additional off-screen uncomfortableness) like adults.

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Delator on 04 Jan 2011, 13:23
Waffles win.

Why do Waffles win ?

http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=510

http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=524


...that's why.  :-D

---

As for comic...I has prediction.

Jeph, if you happen to be reading this, just turn around and walk away...  :wink:




Veronica and Dora are going to have a nice heartfelt chat, during which Dora's going to have some sort of epiphany and start balling her eyes out like we sort of saw in 1802.

Marten will show up at that moment, having deduced his mom's trickery, and get the wrong idea...assuming that she's executing a verbal beatdown in lieu of the physical one Marten averted in 1801.

The long anticipated Marten Rage Storm then occurs...directed at his mom.

Hilarity ensues.




...now for Jeph to prove me wrong.  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: cassie on 04 Jan 2011, 13:26
While everyone is seemingly expecting massive violence and/or somthing related to Ms Reed's dayjob, I'm anticipating a nice rational discussion (with some additional off-screen uncomfortableness) like adults.


Me too. Marten's mom is a classy chick in my opinion, I doubt she'd go and punch Dora or anything like that.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Mustakyy on 04 Jan 2011, 13:39
While everyone is seemingly expecting massive violence and/or somthing related to Ms Reed's dayjob, I'm anticipating a nice rational discussion (with some additional off-screen uncomfortableness) like adults.



Totally. Maybe with a hint of (accidental) humour.


And.. "I TOLD YOU TO SAY I WAS IN CANADA" ? Knowing that the year has just started, im still having a hunch that this might be seen at the next QC-Phrase poll..  :-D simply priceless!

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 04 Jan 2011, 13:40

...just write an app to sound the ring-tone after a suitable delay.


What if her phone had a function to ring at a pre-determined time.

Like maybe an "alarm" function?

Occam's Razor right there.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 04 Jan 2011, 14:14
and start balling her eyes out
Now there's a vivid mental picture.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 04 Jan 2011, 14:16
Could also be that SOMEONE AT COD called Ms. Reed and told her "hey Dora's here lets do this."


Faye...  thinking "ok lets get this over with so Marty can get on with his life..."

Penny...  thinking "lets have some fun at the Boss's expense"

Pintsize... thinking "lets Youtube this for maximum LULZ"
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: leahneedsanap on 04 Jan 2011, 14:25
I agree it's unlikely Marten's mom will hurt Dora, but I'm also not sure they're going to have a serious heart to heart about it.  This is all supposed to take place in the time of a plausible phone call during dinner, remember?  My vote is for either a brief dropping of warnings or wisdom on Dora and limiting her involvement to that, or her and Dora agree to talk later--in some arena where they can be a little more equal, instead of Dora just having a really serious and intimidating conversation just sprung on her.  Although if Marten's mom thinks that her dropping by the shop and confronting Dora when she was supposed to be taking a phone call is going to stay a secret, she's kidding herself.  And Marten will be mad.  If even she didn't know he was going to see that as a major boundary-crossing, she wouldn't bother being sneaky about it--and trying to do it when Marten couldn't follow her even if he was suspicious, because he's a little tied up with Hanners and Tai at the restaurant.

Or, Marigold comes in and is all HEY GUYS WHAT'S UP and awkward ensues, in which nothing goes the way anyone wants it to.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: DJRubberducky on 04 Jan 2011, 14:49
I just have one generic observation about Marten's mom's conduct and whether it's gonna UNLEASH THE STORM OF RAGE that everyone's hoping for:

Let's please remember that Marten's mother is a professional dominatrix in addition to being a fetish model.

Moreover, she's been at this for over a decade, perhaps going on two by this point.

While I willingly confess only a passing experience with BDSM in my own life, I've been around folks who are part of that community, and heard them sing praises and fling curses.  And from all that, I've pieced together that Ms. Reed would not have lasted this long as a professional if she did not possess some skill in reading people.  While "the lifestyle" actually requires a fair amount of up-front communication, that only rarely comes easily to someone who's new to it, and I would guess Ms. Reed has handled her fair share of "newbies".

The reason I say all this is that I remain fairly confident that Marten's mom knows where her boy's buttons and boundaries are.  There might be one or two new things that have blossomed since he moved away, but usually the fundamentals stay the same.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Kamendae on 04 Jan 2011, 14:50
... as a look of righteous murderous rage screaming "BABY BEGS NOW!!!"...

http://superstupor.com/sust12272007.shtml (http://superstupor.com/sust12272007.shtml)?  Or is that more of a well-traveled meme than I've seen?   :-D
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Wiregeek on 04 Jan 2011, 16:01
I can happily wipe my ass with most of Supor Stupor, but that plotline right there made me laugh quite heartily and quite frequently.


I am VERY looking forward to this plot point! I have a sneaking suspicion that MartenMom is intentionally setting up a Marten Rage Bomb that she can catch and cope with, to prevent him from lashing out at any of his peer group...

Looking forward to the boom!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: merv on 04 Jan 2011, 16:20
I agree with Delator's post. In some way Marten will find out and regardless of what his mother says or does he will be at least upset with her.

I think what Veronica is doing here is very inappropriate, why has no one else brought this up? Her son just broke up with this girl, and there is no reason for her to add to the pain in this situation. It's not like;
a) she cheated on Marten
b) she stole anything of Marten's

I don't think Marten will get into a "rage", but I do feel he will be assertive for once, insisting it's his break-up and his Mum has crossed the line by going to see his ex.
I think as much as Dora needs counseling, Marten does too.
It will be really interesting to see what happens when Dora gets counseling. I would love it if she has to go and see each of her ex's to confront them about their behaviour, or even if she just gets in touch with her old crowd.
Having a "seven evil ex" thread would be fun, where you find these former macho-goths are now mellowed out. (Possibly). Plus if there would be any reason for Hanners to meet someone with a nose ring and freak out, I am for it. 

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Boomslang on 04 Jan 2011, 16:47
Hanners to meet someone with a nose ring and freak out, I am for it. 

Um, you know Hanners has a number of piercings, right? Granted, they're all in her ears, but she's stated that piercings themselves aren't freakout material.

The only way she'd flip is if she saw an infected nose piercing. Heck, I get a bit queasy about stuff like that.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: AnAverageWriter on 04 Jan 2011, 16:48
Marigold would look good in a collar - so would Hanners.
*Walks off whistling innocently*

Somehow Marigold doesn't strike me as that kind of girl...
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Heliphyneau on 04 Jan 2011, 16:50
and start balling her eyes out
Now there's a vivid mental picture.

Not to mention uncomfortable.   :wink:

I don't know if Ms. Reed is going to have an earnest heart-to-heart with Dora or give her a gentle ultimatum, but I agree that her expression indicates that she's not there to tear into her son's ex.  Possible surprise guest at CoD tomorrow: "Kirk?  My goodness, I was just talking about you!"
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: akronnick on 04 Jan 2011, 17:00
Kirk?

Oh, please Jesus God no!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: tomart on 04 Jan 2011, 17:49
realized it's highly unlikely we're going to see Dora chained to a wall, covered in bruises and beat to heck, with Veronica standing nearby, in full regalia, brandishing a bullwhip with a frayed tip as well as a look of righteous murderous rage screaming "BABY BEGS NOW!!!"...
...at least not before Friday.

I wish...  But I'll guess that by now, Jeph is (as usual) a step or two ahead of us (me.)  This scene, as ideal as it seems, has been bandied about enough that he's thought up the next dramatic step; and Veronica's calm walk over to see Dora seems to herald it.  

But let's see SOME invocation of righteous retribution, to please us rabid fans!   :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 04 Jan 2011, 18:40
Come to think of it, Veronica was very easy-going with Faye before she gave that little "Hieronymous Bosch" speech. She could be very much the kind, considerate and caring person toward Dora - before she lays on the "get fixed or I will personally HELP Faye put you in the emergency room. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1802)

"Or what's left of you."
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 04 Jan 2011, 18:49
Ms. Reed may have assessed Faye as needing both sympathetic understanding and a good scare. Maybe she'll give Dora what Dora needs, whatever that turns out to be.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: MightionNY on 04 Jan 2011, 19:42
... as a look of righteous murderous rage screaming "BABY BEGS NOW!!!"...

http://superstupor.com/sust12272007.shtml (http://superstupor.com/sust12272007.shtml)?  Or is that more of a well-traveled meme than I've seen?   :-D

Yes, that strip was exactly where the BABY BEGS NOW! came from.  I just loved that comic... even though I've not read Super Stupor except what shows up in an S*P archive binge. :)
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: The Duke on 04 Jan 2011, 20:04
Dora's going to have some sort of epiphany and start balling her eyes out

Like, with a melon baller, or what?

Sorry, couldn't resist.   :-P
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: akronnick on 04 Jan 2011, 20:29
So would Dora be using the melon baller on her own eyes or Veronica's?

Or Penelope's?

And does that mean we have to list the melon baller with the broadswarod et. al. when listing the shop's weapons inventory?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Delator on 04 Jan 2011, 21:18
Dora's going to have some sort of epiphany and start balling her eyes out

Like, with a melon baller, or what?

Sorry, couldn't resist.   :-P

So would Dora be using the melon baller on her own eyes or Veronica's?

Or Penelope's?

And does that mean we have to list the melon baller with the broadswarod et. al. when listing the shop's weapons inventory?

...I'll be here all week. Try the fish.



 :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 04 Jan 2011, 21:54
Dora getting a hug from Veronica?

Cue Marten walking by the window in 3...2...
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: LordVaughn on 04 Jan 2011, 23:47
Well, to say that this was unexpected for me would be the greatest understatement of the year.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: IlGreven on 04 Jan 2011, 23:51
Dora getting a hug from Veronica?

Cue Marten walking by the window in 3...2...

Nah, he's still at the restaurant.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: snubnose on 04 Jan 2011, 23:53
Yay Comic ! But: I swear I never saw THAT one coming ... Jeph is the Jedi Master !


Waffles win.

Why do Waffles win ?

http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=510

http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=524


...that's why.  :-D

But ... but ... Hanners !
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 04 Jan 2011, 23:54
Dora getting a hug from Veronica?

Cue Marten walking by the window in 3...2...

Nah, he's still at the restaurant.

In all fairness I wrote that when Jeph was doing the sketch for the first panel....like three hours ago.

And come on, Marten could have been "Hey...Mom has been gone for a while....Better look for her."
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Fenriswolf on 04 Jan 2011, 23:55
Yay! That was pretty much what I was expecting - and was glad to get.  :angel:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: akronnick on 04 Jan 2011, 23:55
What an odd thing to go out of one's way to make a point of...

If nobody yells at Dora soon so she can lash out at them instead of facing her own insecurity, her head's gonna pop clean off!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: PureLionHeart on 04 Jan 2011, 23:57
FALSE SENSE OF SECURITY!
I still believe!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 05 Jan 2011, 00:04
A false sense of security not just for Dora, but for us. Tomorrows comic is gonna be Veronica walking back into the resturant and calmly placing Dora's bloody severed head on the table. Only one five words of dialogue, from Veronica:

"I took care of it."
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Nentuaby on 05 Jan 2011, 00:28
You'd think she'd be a bit better at "mean on demand" given her line of work. :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 05 Jan 2011, 00:37
Marigold would look good in a collar - so would Hanners.
*Walks off whistling innocently*

...this could be good fanart material if handled tastefully, and that's really all there is to say on the matter.

As to the comic it is kind of hilarious how Dora seems to expect a violent retribution that no one is giving her. Everyone is instead being so supportive and kind about it that it's freaking her out. Meanwhile, everyone is telling Marten to suck it up, kid, while he fishes for hugs.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: cesariojpn on 05 Jan 2011, 00:49
Dora getting a hug from Veronica?

Cue Marten walking by the window in 3...2...

Just like that one scene in Two and a Half Men.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: themacnut on 05 Jan 2011, 00:54

As to the comic it is kind of hilarious how Dora seems to expect a violent retribution that no one is giving her. Everyone is instead being so supportive and kind about it that it's freaking her out. Meanwhile, everyone is telling Marten to suck it up, kid, while he fishes for hugs.


The Chew Toy/Woobie is not allowed to get hugs. We may WANT him to get hugs, but him not getting them adds to his overall Woobieness.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Pika_power on 05 Jan 2011, 00:57
As to the comic it is kind of hilarious how Dora seems to expect a violent retribution that no one is giving her. Everyone is instead being so supportive and kind about it that it's freaking her out. Meanwhile, everyone is telling Marten to suck it up, kid, while he fishes for hugs.

This bugs me. Why does no one seem to care about Marten? I hate to get on the blame-train, but the break up was due to Dora's insecurities. She needs help, but he deserves sympathy too.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: PureLionHeart on 05 Jan 2011, 01:06
Dora getting a hug from Veronica?

Cue Marten walking by the window in 3...2...

Just like that one scene in Two and a Half Men.

I'm sure the single fan of the show would love the reference. :D
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: michael28 on 05 Jan 2011, 01:07
Bosch Paintings man, BOSCH! Why does the crazy chick with the dead dad gets promised to make her life a Bosch painting?
And the one, wich nuked (it's "torpedieren" in German, but I think dropping the A-Bomb fits better) her first healthy relationship because she's unable to get external help, gets a hug? Not even a dead glare or one of that sad, disappointed looks only women and especially moms can do.

I hereby demand more death glares combined with Murloc gurggling :D

As to the comic it is kind of hilarious how Dora seems to expect a violent retribution that no one is giving her. Everyone is instead being so supportive and kind about it that it's freaking her out. Meanwhile, everyone is telling Marten to suck it up, kid, while he fishes for hugs.
Yeah, living up the gender stereotypes aren't we? The women is always the helpless damsel in distress.
The only thing where Marten should "man" up is get the heck out of this mess, telling that bunch to piss off, to get some time for himself. Seeing how supportive his "friends" are, I'd recommend canada. Become a lumber jack, but he lacks about 20 pounds of muscles to do that and don't break his back :D .

I don't know why Jeph tortures him that much, but nothing i didn't see before in comics or novels. Authors give the main protagonist a bad time, especially if the hero is a representation of the writer in the story.
It took 29years of strips and that shitty animated movies for Jon in Garfield to finally date the nice pet doctor.
I hope Jeph likes Marten more than that :D.

Typing that, I'm reminded, what Marten said before Faye knocked him out, about him helping crazy chicks, he likes so they can bang other dudes (or women if Tai ever gets lucky with Dora ^^).
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 05 Jan 2011, 01:23

The Chew Toy/Woobie is not allowed to get hugs. We may WANT him to get hugs, but him not getting them adds to his overall Woobieness.


I think it's more being played for ironic humor, albeit in a very subtle way. Neither party is getting what they want. Dora wants her feelings of self-anger and guilt and such validated but she gets affection and understanding. Marten wants to be coddled and instead he gets tough love.

It's hard, Marten. Being a kid and growing up.

It's hard and nobody understands.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: pwhodges on 05 Jan 2011, 01:31
Spot on.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: themacnut on 05 Jan 2011, 01:54
The real irony is how Dora is being made more and more sympathetic with every appearance since the breakup. You can't help feeling just as sorry for, or even sorrier, for her than Marten even though Marten's the one who got dumped. I suppose it's only fair, since Dora's gotten a fair amount of boos and hisses (and quite a few 'great for Marten') sentiments since the dumping, so Jeph's naturally going to try to raise sympathy for her.

I just wonder if Marten's going to risk setting foot in CoD again to confront his mom if he figures out where she's gone. Let's not forget, that the norm for many people after a breakup is to never see their exes again, it's easier than dealing with the discomfort of moving past the breakup to build a platonic relationship. And not seeing Dora again wouldn't impact Marten's social circle much-he'd still see Faye and Hannelore, since they live in the same building, Steve is more his friend than Dora's anyway, and Tai would still be his boss and work buddy. He just wouldn't set foot in CoD anymore, nor would Dora be coming to his apartment.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: michael28 on 05 Jan 2011, 01:57

The Chew Toy/Woobie is not allowed to get hugs. We may WANT him to get hugs, but him not getting them adds to his overall Woobieness.


I think it's more being played for ironic humor, albeit in a very subtle way. Neither party is getting what they want. Dora wants her feelings of self-anger and guilt and such validated but she gets affection and understanding. Marten wants to be coddled and instead he gets tough love.

It's hard, Marten. Being a kid and growing up.

It's hard and nobody understands.
I think it's more about what Marten doesn't want, first, he doesn't want to get pissed on on a regular basis by his social circle. And that's what's happening right now. He didn't want his relationship to end and he didn't want Dora to take the easy way of flight.
Not even Dora wanted their r. to end, but she wasn't capable of getting help before launching the icbm and now she's short of dying her hair black, start cutting her forearms (remember if you want to do it right, go along the road not across!) and listen to sad emo music.

Both need a swift kick to the rear (with steel capped ass kicking boots), or their sad, sad membership cards to the Emo-Club.

Even the arc about Faith working through her dad's suicide was more ironic and humorous than that current story line, and there are lightyears of disctance between witnessing the death of a loved one where your worrying about the cirumstances and breaking up because of the eternal happy relationship syndrom of a couple of mid-twenties (near-30s).

@themacnut
Dora got 1 death glare and a don't-you-dare-to-wallow-in-self-pity-it's-your-own-fault speech from Faye (and a forced therapist session, which I want to see soon) the reast were nice hugs, and so on . Marten instead was the target of pranks, got knocked out because of something interesting he said, while beeing drunk, has his mom who forced a visit on him around, who embarasses him in every second panel. Maybe that's the reaction of Jeph, for the crowd of supporting Marten an hating Dora, but I still think, Marten could use a hug way more than Dora.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: themacnut on 05 Jan 2011, 02:23
I agree, Marten could use a hug a lot more than Dora. But in the interests of ironic humor and Marten remaining as the comic's Chew Toy/Woobie, he ain't gettin' one.

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Schmorgluck on 05 Jan 2011, 03:10
You'd think she'd be a bit better at "mean on demand" given her line of work. :evil:
Indeed. Maybe too short a notice to put herself in the proper state of mind.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 05 Jan 2011, 03:46
I think it's a bit disingenuous to rush to apply a trope to Marten. Recall that for the past year, he was doing very well by his own standards and that of most of his social group. He certainly seemed satisfied right up until the end recently.

He's not the chew toy, he's just stuck in the midst of rapid change. He doesn't do change very well, as has been pointed out in several threads.

I also think this echoes the early days of the comic, and may be a little teensy bit of Jeph giving people who complained about Dora and about Marty's relationship and his happiness their just desserts.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: michael28 on 05 Jan 2011, 04:37
...
I also think this echoes the early days of the comic, and may be a little teensy bit of Jeph giving people who complained about Dora and about Marty's relationship and his happiness their just desserts.
I hope those people are happy with this mess. Me, I'd like dinner this time without a dessert, please.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Wraith11B on 05 Jan 2011, 04:45
I kinda just want to see the entirety of Veronica's outfit.  Some sort of mini with thigh-high boots of some kind?  Yes, please!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Border Reiver on 05 Jan 2011, 04:53
Meanwhile, back at the restaurant, "Where's Mom?  Must have been a helluva long call - I'll need to get the salad to go."

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Olymander on 05 Jan 2011, 05:07
I kinda just want to see the entirety of Veronica's outfit.  Some sort of mini with thigh-high boots of some kind?  Yes, please!

Yes, those are some very nice looking boot tops.  This is the first semi-good look we get at those tops, after that quick glimpse back in 1822 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1822).
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Jan 2011, 06:46
To me, the most telling statement in that entire strip is "It'd be easier if you'd just be MEAN about it."

This woman EXPECTS to be treated like $#!+ when it comes to relationships and the aftermath.

That is just not right.

EDIT: Dear God, we're talking about her Boot Tops? <facepalm>
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Border Reiver on 05 Jan 2011, 07:27
JW (I can call you that right?  If not just say so)  I think you've hit the nail on the head here. 

Dora's reaction since the breakup is to expect to be treated abosolutely horribly by everyone, and the fact that she isn't is sort of freaking her out.  She's still waiting for the big shoe to drop and the wait is killing her.

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: sitnspin on 05 Jan 2011, 07:50
@jkwhouk - And I can totally identify with her on that. Most of my relationships have ended due to it being my fault, and I always expect to be raked over the coals. when I eventually found myself in a circle of friends who are actually supportive and understanding, I didn't know how to take it at all. It is scary when your world changes, even when it is for the better. When your learned expectations are not met, you have no idea how to respond.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 05 Jan 2011, 08:14

That is just not right.


Why do you think it's not right?

Breaking up with someone is commonly considered a bad thing. Expecting further backlash in the context of social polarisation would seem to be fairly normal to me. I think it's part of how we're conditioned on social, moral and ethical transgressions.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: cuzsis on 05 Jan 2011, 08:37
 Well, today was a big heap of "more of the same for Dora".

 What's the point of hauling Marten's mom out here if we're just going to see another supportive hug?

/comic, I am dissappoint.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Olymander on 05 Jan 2011, 08:40
EDIT: Dear God, we're talking about her Boot Tops? <facepalm>

Hey, above the knee boots aren't exactly super common items.  And besides, it makes a nice diversion from all the "panic panic" that everyone was going into over Mrs. Reed visting CoD.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Black Sword on 05 Jan 2011, 09:03
Y'all can thank themacnut for me dropping out of lurker status and actually posting. I don't feel sorry for Dora, and it's actually fairly aggravating that she's getting all of this undeserved support. My ex ruined a perfectly good relationship based on similarly flimsy reasoning and insecurities, and it pissed me off just as much back then that she was reassured and coddled by our social circle while I got the boot. I may be tough, but kicking me when I'm down provokes me to break you, not "get over it."

Eventually, it resulted in our social circle splitting into halves in a very messy, extended breakdown. I understand a writer's desire and vulnerability through their characters, but Dora did something that shouldn't be minimized so...trivially.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: cuzsis on 05 Jan 2011, 09:35
Y'all can thank themacnut for me dropping out of lurker status and actually posting. I don't feel sorry for Dora, and it's actually fairly aggravating that she's getting all of this undeserved support. My ex ruined a perfectly good relationship based on similarly flimsy reasoning and insecurities, and it pissed me off just as much back then that she was reassured and coddled by our social circle while I got the boot. I may be tough, but kicking me when I'm down provokes me to break you, not "get over it."

Eventually, it resulted in our social circle splitting into halves in a very messy, extended breakdown. I understand a writer's desire and vulnerability through their characters, but Dora did something that shouldn't be minimized so...trivially.

 What OP  said ^.

 -Dora's the one who couldn't wait more than *2* days to jump Marten after Faye shot him down.

 -She then pulled one thing after another on Marten with her insecurities.

- She casually told people *point blank* that she didn't see the relationship lasting. (Not that she ever bothered to tell Marten or anything.)

 -Then when her insecurities finally got too much for her to handle, she dumped Marten instead of facing up to them.

***********************************************************************************************

 I think anyone with two functioning brain cells would rightfully assume people to be a little pissed at them after they've farked up as badly as Dora did.

 I'm sympathetic to her in the conversational sense that 'Yeah, man that sucks.' Because it's always really painful when you screw up that much.
 
 However, since it was the person's fault they got into the mess in the first place. I'm not going to sit there and cuddle them like they got the short end of the stick or something ("Oh, I'm so so sorry for you!"). They didn't. This is all their own making. And now it's time for them to face the music and *un-fark* up their lives. That's what being an adult is all about.

 
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: GeoffTheLlama on 05 Jan 2011, 10:10
Oh, good!  We're back to Dora-demonizing.

Fantastic.   :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: davidv on 05 Jan 2011, 10:12
Dora wants to be punished. She knows she ruined something that was working because she acted like a crazy person. And instead, everyone is acting all supporting and nice, including the professional dominatrix. Nothing is worse than when you feel like you deserve to be treated badly and aren't.

Dora is probably in hell right now.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: GeoffTheLlama on 05 Jan 2011, 10:17
Y'all can thank themacnut for me dropping out of lurker status and actually posting. I don't feel sorry for Dora, and it's actually fairly aggravating that she's getting all of this undeserved support. My ex ruined a perfectly good relationship based on similarly flimsy reasoning and insecurities, and it pissed me off just as much back then that she was reassured and coddled by our social circle while I got the boot. I may be tough, but kicking me when I'm down provokes me to break you, not "get over it."

Eventually, it resulted in our social circle splitting into halves in a very messy, extended breakdown. I understand a writer's desire and vulnerability through their characters, but Dora did something that shouldn't be minimized so...trivially.

Yes, how dare she break up with Marten rather than continuing a relationship that she felt she couldn't be secure in and she couldn't see through to the long-term without the fighting constantly happening.  How dare she break up with Marten rather than making him go through her recovery with her, which could have resulted in a break-up anyway.  How dare she spare him the stress.  How dare she, that selfish bitch.

Am I getting the tone right?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Black Sword on 05 Jan 2011, 10:46
Y'all can thank themacnut for me dropping out of lurker status and actually posting. I don't feel sorry for Dora, and it's actually fairly aggravating that she's getting all of this undeserved support. My ex ruined a perfectly good relationship based on similarly flimsy reasoning and insecurities, and it pissed me off just as much back then that she was reassured and coddled by our social circle while I got the boot. I may be tough, but kicking me when I'm down provokes me to break you, not "get over it."

Eventually, it resulted in our social circle splitting into halves in a very messy, extended breakdown. I understand a writer's desire and vulnerability through their characters, but Dora did something that shouldn't be minimized so...trivially.

Yes, how dare she break up with Marten rather than continuing a relationship that she felt she couldn't be secure in and she couldn't see through to the long-term without the fighting constantly happening.  How dare she break up with Marten rather than making him go through her recovery with her, which could have resulted in a break-up anyway.  How dare she spare him the stress.  How dare she, that selfish bitch.

Am I getting the tone right?

Get your knickers out of their twist, Geoff. I don't see anything in my, cuzsis' or david's where we demonize her. Shall we dissect my post sentence by sentence?

Quote from: Black Sword
I don't feel sorry for Dora
This sentence means I don't feel sympathy for the character in this instance. I did not call her a selfish bitch, nor did I particularly go out of my way to declare her a plague upon mankind. In fact, I didn't say anything about Dora, I simply said that I did not feel an emotion where I would want to give her a "break," as Americans put it.

Quote from: Black Sword
it's actually fairly aggravating that she's getting all of this undeserved support.
Here we get into the emotional part. I find the support and sympathy she's getting by the metric ton to be aggravating, as I do not feel it is deserved. Why I feel it is undeserved, whatever her insecurities?

Quote from: Black Sword
My ex ruined a perfectly good relationship based on similarly flimsy reasoning and insecurities, and it pissed me off just as much back then that she was reassured and coddled by our social circle while I got the boot.
Here I explain why I feel this support is undeserved. Flimsy reasoning and insecurities do NOT make for adequate excuses. Your trollish (or fanboyish?) response to mine communicates clearly that you consider it sufficient, but do cite however many times Marten became jealous, tested his girlfriend, or otherwise reacted in an extreme manner. Marten was so loyal that he felt awful about the Hanner boob incident, even though it wasn't his fault. Dora felt insecure about Faye. Alright, fine. She felt insecure because Marten previously liked Faye. Ok, fine. ...so what? Marten did not cheat on her, did not do anything with Faye. They went out of their way to make her see nothing was happening or would happen. She let an insecurity define her. Very unhealthy, very inexcusable. If it was such a major issue she did not have the mental strength to overcome (to be honest, I don't think many of our lovable QC crew are very mentally strong, so no slap against Dora), then she should have sought some help long ago.

Quote from: Black Sword
I may be tough, but kicking me when I'm down provokes me to break you, not "get over it."
This is me exploring how people are treating Marty. Marty responds to tough love much more passive aggressively than I would. I'm not saying he'll explode, but it's not having the desired effect because it's too soon for one, and for another, it takes too much for him to get angry.

Quote from: Black Sword
Eventually, it resulted in our social circle splitting into halves in a very messy, extended breakdown. I understand a writer's desire and vulnerability through their characters, but Dora did something that shouldn't be minimized so...trivially.
What happened in my instance? My social circle split up very messily, one half with me, the other with her. As a writer, I understand that many writers put bits of themselves in their characters, and react very negatively to personal criticism of that character, as they feel it's aimed at them. However, Dora did something that is her own fault. She's an adult and she has not really faced any consequences for her action, which never should have happened in the first place. She's getting coddled, while the break up, her fault, has had more negative consequences on Marten than her. Her role and fault have been trivialized, minimized, swept under the rug.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: azurite on 05 Jan 2011, 11:02
#1833 might be my favorite QC. All my concerns about the direction strip is taking, assuaged in two panels. I really shoulda known better, but all the same--thank you, Jeph!   :-)
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Kugai on 05 Jan 2011, 11:53
Actually, when you think about it, this is worse punishment for Dora than if Veronica had walked in and pulled out the whips and chains.

She was expecting Martens mom to crucify her, but instead she gets . . . . this,  I think she would prefer being strung up and whipped by Veronica than this.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: DSL on 05 Jan 2011, 12:02
One vote here for "Marten's mom knows, more or less, what she's doing."
My first read on the character in this situation was a sort of endearing klutziness in matters not involving domination, as evidenced by the improvised insult at the end of No. 1833. Hey, tryin' to make Dora happy, right?
Then it occurred to me Ms. V. might (instinctively) know that what Martin and Dora (think they) want right now is not what they need.
Marten wants to the the pitied Noble Victim. A couple of his friends (I like Tai) know that's not what he needs.
Dora wants "reassurance" that This Is All Her Fault -- because that way she still gets to be in control (and control is a big thing with her, because if we can take Sven at face value after the  Underpants Incident, our benighted barista was never really in control of a relationship until after ambushing Marten on the rooftop).
Ms. V. understands -- Ain't Gonna Get What You Want. Whether this proceeds from Dom or Mom, I think the lady's on to something.
Perhaps if I was still in my 20s and just coming off what I thought at the time was a Tale of Tragic Love, I might be part of the pack after Dora with pitchforks and torches. But age lends --- well, at least the fatigue that simulates wisdom. I like Veronica.
And yes, I too would like to see more of Veronica's outfit. Though I would also consider it a good joke on us, including myself, for Jeph to "pull back the camera" and reveal the good Ms. V. is wearing leg warmers and pack-boots hastily purchased on the way from the airport.
There does need to be a 'splosion, though. I vote for a Hannerhulk moment, preferably after the restaurant gang, including Marten, mooches into the caffienery and misinterprets everything. Hannerhulk moments tend to be oddly ... constructive, even if the poor kid doesn't remember them afterwards.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: pwhodges on 05 Jan 2011, 12:21
Dora is probably in hell right now.

But a friendly, considerate  hell.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: maddness on 05 Jan 2011, 12:40
Y'all can thank themacnut for me dropping out of lurker status and actually posting. I don't feel sorry for Dora, and it's actually fairly aggravating that she's getting all of this undeserved support. My ex ruined a perfectly good relationship based on similarly flimsy reasoning and insecurities, and it pissed me off just as much back then that she was reassured and coddled by our social circle while I got the boot. I may be tough, but kicking me when I'm down provokes me to break you, not "get over it."

Eventually, it resulted in our social circle splitting into halves in a very messy, extended breakdown. I understand a writer's desire and vulnerability through their characters, but Dora did something that shouldn't be minimized so...trivially.

Yes, how dare she break up with Marten rather than continuing a relationship that she felt she couldn't be secure in and she couldn't see through to the long-term without the fighting constantly happening.  How dare she break up with Marten rather than making him go through her recovery with her, which could have resulted in a break-up anyway.  How dare she spare him the stress.  How dare she, that selfish bitch.

Am I getting the tone right?

Yes, what an angel she is to break up with a guy she lives with and spare him the hardship of working through a problem in their relationship like adults do.

Okay, seriously, I don't think breaking up with Marten makes Dora an evil bitch, but can we not slap a halo on her either? She didn't break up with Marten to spare him stress, she broke up with him because she wanted to break the cycle where she drove herself crazy because of her issues, blew up at Marten and then felt like crap over it. That's not a bad thing, it was probably the right thing given her circumstances, but it's not a selfless motivation either. The thing is, she never tried to get help, not before embarking on a relationship after the last guy who messed her up emotionally, not after the first blow up or any time thereafter when she realized she was letting her past relationship traumas affect her relationship with Marten and not before going to the extreme of ending a relationship with someone she apparently cared enough about to move in with. If she chooses not to work through issues she knows are causing negative affects in her life, then I don't see why people should have to feel sorry for her or be made out to be demonizing her.

Personally, I do feel bad for her because when a relationship that you were emotionally invested in is over you hurt, even if you were the one to end it. Dora is expecting people to be angry and treat her badly over the break up because she is angry with herself over the break up, feels she's ruined something good because she can't get past her trust issues, and is probably tearing herself up inside. A part of her hates what she's done while another part of her is sure she did the right thing for both herself and Marten. Having someone else heap the abuse on her would giver her the treatment she thinks she deserves right now, but it would also help her externalize it, maybe give her something tangible to rally herself against. It's easier to defend yourself from others than the insidious voices in your head. I don't feel sorry for her, because it was her choice to end it rather than try to get help and work on the relationship, but I do feel bad for her and what she's going through right now.


Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Boomslang on 05 Jan 2011, 13:09
Marten wants to the the pitied Noble Victim. A couple of his friends (I like Tai) know that's not what he needs.

I would disagree that's what Marten wants, but it's probably what most of the cast thinks he wants.

What Marten almost certainly wants and needs right now is to feel in control of his life and destiny, and he's not getting any help there from anyone. What Dora hammered home, intentionally or not, is that what Marten wanted didn't matter. Dora made it clear that nothing Marten could have ever done would have changed that. What is his mom doing, this entire trip? Doing precisely what she knows Marten doesn't want her to do. Repeatedly, and without real cause.

At some point, Marten might just start agreeing with them that what he wants doesn't matter. And that's not a place you want to be in.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Wraith11B on 05 Jan 2011, 14:06
I've been there.  And--similarly as Nietzsche said--as you stare into that inky blackness, it stares right back into you.

I would hope that Marten does not get to be like that.  One, he's got friends that will hopefully recognize the signs of someone that gets to be like that.  Two, they interact on a regular enough cycle that it would get caught early.  I've had similar goings-on, and now am a fairly cold fish.  Marten shouldn't get that way.  He'll muddle through.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: cesariojpn on 05 Jan 2011, 14:14
Actually, when you think about it, this is worse punishment for Dora than if Veronica had walked in and pulled out the whips and chains.

She did fap to Veronica's pics back in the day, so I dunno if that would've been a threat or a compliment.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: leahneedsanap on 05 Jan 2011, 14:29

Dora wants "reassurance" that This Is All Her Fault -- because that way she still gets to be in control (and control is a big thing with her, because if we can take Sven at face value after the  Underpants Incident, our benighted barista was never really in control of a relationship until after ambushing Marten on the rooftop).

I'm not sure she really wants this, if her expectations that everyone is going to beat her up and she's inviting it in this way.  I think she wants someone to tell her it IS her fault because she knows this incident represents her issues spiralling out of control and really being untenable, especially after what Faye has said to her. But she's afraid to take the big jump of confronting herself, and she wants other people to push her to do what she needs to do--it's why she gave in when Faye pushed her to call her therapist NOW.  

I think there is a lot of people thinking they know what Marten and Dora need right now--but not so much actual knowing.   Marten's mom thinks she's helping, but all she's done since she got there is violate his boundaries, basically recreating his breakup with Dora and punishing him every time he tries to stand up for himself--hell her whole visit is a boundary violation cause she asked him not to do it.  That seems like it's getting into exactly the territory Wraith is talking about.  And I'm not saying Marten's mom should give Dora the abuse she's looking for, but I don't think just saying "it's all okay I forgive you!" is helping much either--although if it's a transitional statement to saying you have problems and you need to work it out.  I think Hanners did a pretty good job, especially for her comfort level, by giving back the Worry Hat--it just says, hey, I'm your friend and I'm here for you.  I think Faye did even better by being a supportive friend who is also calling out a friend on destructive behavior and giving her some tough love to follow through on doing something about it.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Heliphyneau on 05 Jan 2011, 14:31
Okay, seriously, I don't think breaking up with Marten makes Dora an evil bitch, but can we not slap a halo on her either? She didn't break up with Marten to spare him stress, she broke up with him because she wanted to break the cycle where she drove herself crazy because of her issues, blew up at Marten and then felt like crap over it. That's not a bad thing, it was probably the right thing given her circumstances, but it's not a selfless motivation either.

With you on that.  I feel bad for both Marten and Dora and I hope they both find some measure of comfort to help them move on.  Dora's pain is mostly self-created, both during and after the relationship, so the hell she's in is her own making.  As for Marten, he's still working the emotional splinter out -- odds are it's gonna take some digging before he can start to heal.  Maybe Marten's Mom knows exactly what she's doing, or maybe haplessness runs in the family, or maybe it's something in between.  I hope he opens up to his Mom or someone soon.

Further down the line, I'd like Marten to jam out with Hanners and Amir.  Pouring his emotions into music could help him if he's too bottled up.

And hey, what's wrong with commenting on Ms. Reed's boots?   :psyduck:  They're cool, yo -- don't be hatin'!





 :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: pwhodges on 05 Jan 2011, 14:41
Frankly, the tops of the "boots" look more like leg-warmers to me...
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: tomart on 05 Jan 2011, 16:18
What Marten almost certainly wants and needs right now is to feel in control of his life and destiny, and he's not getting any help there from anyone. What Dora hammered home, intentionally or not, is that what Marten wanted didn't matter. Dora made it clear that nothing Marten could have ever done would have changed that. What is his mom doing, this entire trip? Doing precisely what she knows Marten doesn't want her to do. Repeatedly, and without real cause.

At some point, Marten might just start agreeing with them that what he wants doesn't matter. And that's not a place you want to be in.

Jeph is great with (often uncomfortable) ironic imbalances - the noble victim Marten getting emotionally trashed by his friends and family, dumper Dora getting undeserved hugs and support.  Speaking for myself, I do tend to get uncomfortable when it goes on "too long", and that's subjectively different when we're hanging on the slow daily schedule, and later when we're breezing through the archives at lightspeed.

I'm learning to trust Jeph's script pacing - it can seem agonizingly slow to resolve a painful imbalance while it's happening, but in the grand scheme, I find later it's deliciously drawn-out, rather than agaonizingly protracted.   :-D
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Jan 2011, 16:20

That is just not right.


Why do you think it's not right?

Breaking up with someone is commonly considered a bad thing. Expecting further backlash in the context of social polarization would seem to be fairly normal to me. I think it's part of how we're conditioned on social, moral and ethical transgressions.

No, no: what's not right is that she expects to be treated badly. As in "irrational desire/expectation of feeling bad" about this. Yeah, it's one thing to be given the Faye "you effed up a good thing", but it's another thing to want to be treated badly. You're OK, I'm not OK, and all that.

I'm not going to play psychologist or anything, but the level of near self-loathing Dora has ain't healthy.

EDIT: Oh, and for anyone who cares, my first name is Joe. The "JWHOUK" moniker is from the ancient days of the internet when my old dialup ISP insisted on me using my first two initials and last name as an email address. (Said ISP is now belly-up.)
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Rascal on 05 Jan 2011, 16:32
Hello everyone. New here, been spending a lot of time in the archives (jeebus there are a lot!) trying to get caught up, but have been reading the dailies for the last few weeks.

For the record, I'm not terribly happy with Dora. She did get crazy. She did fuck things up. She is being coddled. Why? I have no freaking clue. Maybe Jeph likes her a lot and feels sympathy for her. However, I do not think that Marten should be content to be the victim here (as someone else put it above). In fact, I think both Dora and Marten are being rather immature about the whole thing.

Relationships are work. They don't just magically come into being and they don't just magically maintain themselves. They are communication, sacrifice, compromise -- all because you love that person that much, but because you love yourself too. Ironically, Dora and Marten have sufficient self-loathing (Marten's prominently on his shoulder, Dora's masked beneath denial and witty acrimony) that you kind of have to wonder how either of them could have a healthy relationship.

Nonetheless, in my opinion, the adult response to this would be for Marten to grow a pair. Dora wants to retreat, and as someone said above, be in control of the situation and her life. If she's at fault for her misery, then however stupid and pitiful that might seem, it's something she can control. As much as I can appreciate Marten's pain right now, it's on him to go all white-knight and save her -- from herself.

The adult response would be for him to tell her that even if she's giving up on the relationship, he is not. It would be to tell her that while she desperately needs therapy and must get it, he will be there with her by her side, so they can work through the obstacles and challenges of their relationship together. Marten folds far too easily. He may be loyal to a fault, but he gives in and quits far too easily once rejection rears its ugly head.

That's what they both need. Dora needs that ultimate example of someone valuing and caring for her enough to stay with her and demonstrate their love, despite her being herself at her very, very worst. And Marten needs to know that he can be a heroic figure taking control of his life, not just a tragic one to whom life simply happens.

Granted, that's all simply my opinion :)

On the other hand, we wouldn't have much of a comic if there weren't angst, drama, misery and laughter (at Marten's expense). So.... unlikely we'll see any of the above any time soon ;)
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Jan 2011, 16:38
I've been there.  And--similarly as Nietzsche said--as you stare into that inky blackness, it stares right back into you.

I would hope that Marten does not get to be like that.  One, he's got friends that will hopefully recognize the signs of someone that gets to be like that.  Two, they interact on a regular enough cycle that it would get caught early.  I've had similar goings-on, and now am a fairly cold fish.  Marten shouldn't get that way.  He'll muddle through.

Well, I can understand that, having worked with several GW/OIF vets and hearing about their exploits - especially upon return to the states.

I'm actually with DSL on all this: Veronica may have a life PhD in Interpersonal Relationship Psychology, and may be giving each of them exactly what they need instead of what they want. (Aside: too bad Ms. Reed isn't a bit older; she might start quoting Mick Jagger.)

Only time (and Jeph's wonderful storytelling) will tell if it works or not.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Rascal on 05 Jan 2011, 17:14
On a side note, so much for, "...if you hurt my boy I will introduce you to a whole new realm of pain and suffering. We're talkin' stuff that would make Hieronymus Bosch shit his britches, capisce?"

I'm a bit disappointed, really. No Domme I know would be so... understanding. Not vindictive, mind you, but certainly much more "wtf is wrong with you two?"
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Jan 2011, 17:17
Not every Domme has to have the heavy touch, though. I believe that the appropriate term is, "there's more than one way to skin a cat."
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Rascal on 05 Jan 2011, 17:26
Not every Domme has to have the heavy touch, though. I believe that the appropriate term is, "there's more than one way to skin a cat."

Amusingly enough, the friend who introduced me to QC some weeks ago is a lifestyler Domme. :)

But I digress: you're absolutely right, and I hope my friend will chime in here with her own thoughts. Either way, I hope Marten's mom is about to flip things around after getting the 'be nice to Dora' part out of the way. What's the saying? Something like 'sweeten with honey before the sting?'
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Carl-E on 05 Jan 2011, 17:59
Am I getting the tone right?

I dunno, it's only registering an 8 on the sarcasmometer.  Better turn it up a bit. 

<lots of stuff explaining his previous post, but there was one  thing in here that cought my eye and really bothered me.  And it was...

Quote from: Black Sword
My ex ruined a perfectly good relationship based on similarly flimsy reasoning and insecurities, and it pissed me off just as much back then that she was reassured and coddled by our social circle while I got the boot.
Here I explain why I feel this support is undeserved. Flimsy reasoning and insecurities do NOT make for adequate excuses. Your trollish (or fanboyish?) response to mine communicates clearly that you consider it sufficient, but do cite however many times Marten became jealous, tested his girlfriend, or otherwise reacted in an extreme manner. Marten was so loyal that he felt awful about the Hanner boob incident, even though it wasn't his fault. Dora felt insecure about Faye. Alright, fine. She felt insecure because Marten previously liked Faye. Ok, fine. ...so what? Marten did not cheat on her, did not do anything with Faye. They went out of their way to make her see nothing was happening or would happen. She let an insecurity define her. Very unhealthy, very inexcusable. If it was such a major issue she did not have the mental strength to overcome (to be honest, I don't think many of our lovable QC crew are very mentally strong, so no slap against Dora), then she should have sought some help long ago.

Inexcusable?  Inexcusable?  You've read the comic, right?  She'd been struggling to overcome this insecurity from the very beginning of the relationship.  You're talking like it was something she could control!  Yes, Marten's hurting, and apparantly so are you.  But Dora's the one with the illness, and I don't think I'm going too far in characterizig it as such.  Marten will recover fine, with the help of his friends (Faye, Hanners), his associates (Tai), and his Mom, who's primary purpose right now is to remind him of who he is, and that life will go on.  But Dora needs more.  She needs the tough love that Faye demonstrated, and the understanding from the circle of the party she's injured that she's getting from Ms. Reed to know that the world will not hate her for what she's done.  In order to get healthy, she needs to know that she's not wrong, she's just not well.  She's taken that first step herself, realizing (possibly with Sven's help, we never saw that conversation) why she was doing what she did, and getting out of the cycle.  Now she needs to see that, rather than villanizing her, her friends (and the extended circle around her friends) will also realize what was going on. 

As JWHouk points out, she's getting exactly what she needs, even if it's not what she wants, and especially if it's not comfortable for her. 

The adult response would be for him to tell her that even if she's giving up on the relationship, he is not. It would be to tell her that while she desperately needs therapy and must get it, he will be there with her by her side, so they can work through the obstacles and challenges of their relationship together. Marten folds far too easily. He may be loyal to a fault, but he gives in and quits far too easily once rejection rears its ugly head.

That's what I was hoping would have happened as well.  That's what would have happened had I been Marten. 

But I'm not.  And I think (after seeing how several of my  relationships have gone) that it's a good thing. 
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Akima on 05 Jan 2011, 18:07
I dunno, it's only registering an 8 on the sarcasmometer.
Sarcasmometer FTW! I so wish I had one of those. With a dial that reads up to eleven, of course.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Kugai on 05 Jan 2011, 18:41
Not every Domme has to have the heavy touch, though. I believe that the appropriate term is, "there's more than one way to skin a cat."

Amusingly enough, the friend who introduced me to QC some weeks ago is a lifestyler Domme. :)

But I digress: you're absolutely right, and I hope my friend will chime in here with her own thoughts. Either way, I hope Marten's mom is about to flip things around after getting the 'be nice to Dora' part out of the way. What's the saying? Something like 'sweeten with honey before the sting?'


She'll lure Dora back to her place then  . . . . . . . . . .  :evil:


Little fun/fantasy world/humerous Webcomic she might be interested in  http://collar6.com/   :-D
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 05 Jan 2011, 18:41
I dunno, it's only registering an 8 on the sarcasmometer.
Sarcasmometer FTW! I so wish I had one of those. With a dial that reads up to eleven, of course.


I built one, it goes over 9,000.   
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Kugai on 05 Jan 2011, 18:43
I dunno, it's only registering an 8 on the sarcasmometer.
Sarcasmometer FTW! I so wish I had one of those. With a dial that reads up to eleven, of course.


I built one, it goes over 9,000.   


*Post ubiquitous DBZ reference here*
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Near Lurker on 05 Jan 2011, 20:01
And somewhere at the back of her brain, there's still a squeaky little voice going "Omigod VERONICA VANCE is hugging meee..."
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Wraith11B on 05 Jan 2011, 20:49
Squuuuuuuuuueeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeeee!

Love Jeph's "Squee" sound effect.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: cesariojpn on 05 Jan 2011, 20:54

Little fun/fantasy world/humerous Webcomic she might be interested in  http://collar6.com/   :-D

And: http://bdsmbadadvice.com/?p=17

Damn those Stormtrooper fetishists!! Sexualizing the destruction of Alderaan!!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: retrosteve on 05 Jan 2011, 21:52
Just a side note.  I think Dora *has* gained a little weight since Veronica saw her last!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 05 Jan 2011, 22:36

Little fun/fantasy world/humerous Webcomic she might be interested in  http://collar6.com/   :-D

And: http://bdsmbadadvice.com/?p=17

Damn those Stormtrooper fetishists!! Sexualizing the destruction of Alderaan!!

Hey, man, if loving the Death Star look is wrong, I don't want to be right.

Besides which, Alderaan was  part of the Rebel Alliance and a traitor! ...'s planet!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: beanzilla on 05 Jan 2011, 23:26
On a side note, so much for, "...if you hurt my boy I will introduce you to a whole new realm of pain and suffering. We're talkin' stuff that would make Hieronymus Bosch shit his britches, capisce?"

I'm a bit disappointed, really. No Domme I know would be so... understanding. Not vindictive, mind you, but certainly much more "wtf is wrong with you two?"

I would certainly belive she is thinking the whole "wtf is wrong with you two?," but I think the background thought within the whole phone conversation before Veronica showed up was an understanding of overall intentions.   :wink:

As a former "dumpee" I can say my friends and family were ready to be as vindictive and reprehensible as a pack of wolves feeding on a box of abandoned kittens.  I knew my ex didn't deserve that kind of treatment, especially because we had an almost identical social circle.  I took the stance of "she feels bad enough letting this thing go, she doesn't need to be harped on about it."  We ended up staying close friends with the same social circles and I wouldn't have it any other way.   :police:

The whole Veronica thing is just a way mothers are, with the whole setting up my boy, showing off his youth, and respecting his intents.  My mother talks herself up a good talk and then basically sells me to other girls, which ends up being greatly off-putting to me, but flattering at the deepest level.   :psyduck:

The story-line thus far has been greatly believable, and it's amazing how realistically Jeph can pull off such a comic.   :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Zombat on 06 Jan 2011, 00:33
I haven't been a fan of Marten's mom.  In-comic, she's barely touched on where his head is at, and has done pretty much nothing but exasperate her son.  My folks have done some goofy things when my relationships have gone south, but have also leveled with me and helped me back on my feet.  Maybe it's coming, but that Marten's mom has had more meaningful dialog with Dora in one strip than she has in like seven with Marten is worrisome, especially considering Faye knocking him out the night before.  Hopefully some parental Yoda-esque insight is coming.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: LordVaughn on 06 Jan 2011, 00:41
Odd how the first thing Marten thinks of after finding out about his mother's visit is if there's blood under her nails. Does this mean she's done this kind of thing before?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: CEOIII on 06 Jan 2011, 00:43
Well, she DID offer to kill Dora when she first saw him at the start of this storyline.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: cesariojpn on 06 Jan 2011, 01:04
Odd how the first thing Marten thinks of after finding out about his mother's visit is if there's blood under her nails. Does this mean she's done this kind of thing before?

She could have a bloodplay fetish.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: PureLionHeart on 06 Jan 2011, 01:08
Next chapter: "What do you mean Dora is missing!?"
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 06 Jan 2011, 01:19
Not necessarily true, Hannelore. Veronica could've just used a pistol with a silencer to take Dora out quickly and quietly.

Just sayin'
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Akima on 06 Jan 2011, 01:22
Hannelore can smell GSR. And I'm told silencers aren't nearly as effective in real life as in the movies.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 06 Jan 2011, 01:24
Hannelore would be the best CSI, if she could keep from throwing up.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Mayhem on 06 Jan 2011, 01:57
Y'all can thank themacnut for me dropping out of lurker status and actually posting. I don't feel sorry for Dora, and it's actually fairly aggravating that she's getting all of this undeserved support. My ex ruined a perfectly good relationship based on similarly flimsy reasoning and insecurities, and it pissed me off just as much back then that she was reassured and coddled by our social circle while I got the boot. I may be tough, but kicking me when I'm down provokes me to break you, not "get over it."

Eventually, it resulted in our social circle splitting into halves in a very messy, extended breakdown. I understand a writer's desire and vulnerability through their characters, but Dora did something that shouldn't be minimized so...trivially.

Yes, how dare she break up with Marten rather than continuing a relationship that she felt she couldn't be secure in and she couldn't see through to the long-term without the fighting constantly happening.  How dare she break up with Marten rather than making him go through her recovery with her, which could have resulted in a break-up anyway.  How dare she spare him the stress.  How dare she, that selfish bitch.

Am I getting the tone right?
I love you.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Blackjoker on 06 Jan 2011, 02:00
I think some of the thing might be this, Veronica realized that Marten didn't bear Dora any ill will, or at least didn't want her in pain. She also seemed to like Dora some, so she went over to see her, offer condolences and maybe also try to get some insight into what happened (IE did Marten leave anything out, etc.).  

Do I agree with how she has acted during most of this, not really, I think the way she's acting is at least somewhat cruel to Marten, if only because some of it does kind of feel like making him feel worse when he's already at a low point as well as possibly exacerbating personal problems. Then again, who knows, Jeph is the writer here and so far he's done a good job with the story and I'm looking forward to seeing where this goes. Hopefully not with Marten in a rubber room, but meh, I'm enjoying the ride thus far.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: lessthankate on 06 Jan 2011, 02:02
perhaps Mrs Reed picked up on the fact that Dora wants to be punished, and is punishing her by not giver her what she wants?
screwing with her mind instead of physically or out loud or anything

i hope thats what it is, anyway!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: themacnut on 06 Jan 2011, 03:09


The adult response would be for him to tell her that even if she's giving up on the relationship, he is not. It would be to tell her that while she desperately needs therapy and must get it, he will be there with her by her side, so they can work through the obstacles and challenges of their relationship together. Marten folds far too easily. He may be loyal to a fault, but he gives in and quits far too easily once rejection rears its ugly head.

That's what I was hoping would have happened as well.  That's what would have happened had I been Marten. 

But I'm not.  And I think (after seeing how several of my  relationships have gone) that it's a good thing. 

What Carl-E said above. Saving people from themselves sounds like a noble goal, but in practice it seldom works out for either the prospective rescuer or rescuee. Only Dora can choose to "save herself" here, and if both she and Marten are in a place to resume their relationship after she's saved herself, so much the better. But before then, it's best for both that they go their separate ways for now.

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: akronnick on 06 Jan 2011, 03:12
perhaps Mrs Reed picked up on the fact that Dora wants to be punished, and is punishing her by not giver her what she wants?
screwing with her mind instead of physically or out loud or anything

i hope thats what it is, anyway!

Dora is going to get punished.

She's going to get punished far worse than anything Marten, Faye or Veronica* can dish out.

She's going to punish herself. That's what the whole exercise has been about. She got paranoid because her and Marten's relationship was going so well, she kept trying to provoke him. When he failed to respond, she couldn't accept that it was possible that he actually cared for her, so she trashed things to prevent the cognitive dissonance caused by her own self-loathing.

It's sad really.

I think the characters can sense that this may be what's going on, which is why they're all being so gentle with her.




* Has it been established in canon what Ms. Reed's first name is? Veronica Vance is a pseudonym, but is Veronica her actual first name?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Random832 on 06 Jan 2011, 04:50
* Has it been established in canon what Ms. Reed's first name is? Veronica Vance is a pseudonym, but is Veronica her actual first name?
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1831
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: akronnick on 06 Jan 2011, 04:57
Derp. :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: ZERO on 06 Jan 2011, 05:23
As much as I hate how the breakup occurred, I can empathize with Dora to some extent.

It can be shellshocking to finally find someone who's not full of it, and you're constantly waiting for the other shoe to drop as she waited for. It's even harder to deal with when the other person hasn't even bought the shoes in question. It's sounds silly, I know. My relationship with my girl is the first in the sense that for the first time, I don't have to hide it or be ashamed. Others had parents who were racist, or they were the sister of a best friend who wasn't comfortable with the fact that I was dating her, or was a lesbian, or was a pot-head who only hung out with me to be fed, or was MARRIED. And that caused a lot of drama. And to find that my girl has NO SUCH HANGUPS is a bit of a challenge for me. Because the smallest part of me starts to crave the frickin' abuse that others dished out and as a result, I become paranoid and unsure of myself.

But rather than do what Dora did, I choose to walk it off.

Because I spent many a night asking for a higher power to send me a girl who wasn't full of it, and I finally get one. No one would be sorrier than me if I found someway to screw that up because she won't rise to the challenge of testing my patience from time to time so I can have the conflict I crave. A friend of mine put it in a way that makes sense. He told me, after I presented my dilemma to him that it's a dilemma that he hears about all too often. He says because my girl and I met and clicked pretty much instantly, I miss the challenge. Which is not a not a bad thing. But he says that we're all at the age where we needed to start thinking in the long run. And that really stayed with me.

And that's something that I think Dora hasn't even grasped yet.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: innermoppet on 06 Jan 2011, 05:28
Quote
Perhaps if I was still in my 20s and just coming off what I thought at the time was a Tale of Tragic Love, I might be part of the pack after Dora with pitchforks and torches. But age lends --- well, at least the fatigue that simulates wisdom.

I am similarly fatigued. I want that on a t-shirt.

I'm hoping that Veronica is trying to provoke Marten into getting angry but I don't believe that is what is happening. I think we are seeing the actual microcrosm in which Marten became such a rug. I don't recall who wrote it, but someone posted that Veronica is treating him exactly like Dora, bowling over his personal boundries with a "pshaw" and acting like it doesn't matter when he gets upset about it. That's exactly what's happening. I don't see it as purposeful. I think she has no clue she set her baby up to be such a doormat. I also think Marten will eventually snap on her and let her know how angry he really is.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Loki on 06 Jan 2011, 05:29
As to the comic it is kind of hilarious how Dora seems to expect a violent retribution that no one is giving her. Everyone is instead being so supportive and kind about it that it's freaking her out. Meanwhile, everyone is telling Marten to suck it up, kid, while he fishes for hugs.

This bugs me. Why does no one seem to care about Marten? I hate to get on the blame-train, but the break up was due to Dora's insecurities. She needs help, but he deserves sympathy too.

You know, when I read 1833, I even thought "Shouldn't that be what she would say to her son?" about the first two panels.

Just throwing a random thought out there, Veronica probably has experience regarding breakups. I mean, it turned out eventually that her husband was gay. Would likely have been an unpleasant situation for her at that time.

Next strip prediction:
Marten walks in into CoD and tells Dora "Look, I don't know what she did to you, but I am sorry, I certainly didn't send her"
Dora: "Uh, no, it was fine actually. She was pretty supportive"... *seeing look on Marten's face* "...oh".
Marten has another "Why is noone ever supportive of me" moment like in his drunken stupor.
The plot thickens.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Wraith11B on 06 Jan 2011, 06:15
Hannelore can smell GSR. And I'm told silencers aren't nearly as effective in real life as in the movies.

No, they aren't.  Unless you're using special ammunition, bolt-action/non-automatic (ie, the gun doesn't load the next round for you) weapons, or distance (long range usually helps), silencers really only alter the sound signature and reduce decibels.  So, she'd have had to use a .22LR pistol with subsonic ammo to make that work.

Also, I feel like anyone should help the dumper/ee as far as to get over.  It's over, it's done, it happened.  Nothing will change the past.  Either drive on, or be left behind.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 06 Jan 2011, 06:27
* Has it been established in canon what Ms. Reed's first name is? Veronica Vance is a pseudonym, but is Veronica her actual first name?
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1831

Earlier than that:
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=461 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=461)
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 06 Jan 2011, 06:30
What are you looking forward to in the new year?

Mom vs. Dora!    - 30 (20.3%)
Hannelore eating at Taco Bell!    - 11 (7.4%)
More Faye/Angus!    - 17 (11.5%)
Marten finding someone new!    - 10 (6.8%)
Marigold going out on a DATE!    - 27 (18.2%)
More Pintsize shenaningans!    - 6 (4.1%)
Action! Adventure! Romance!    - 20 (13.5%)
Waffles.    - 27 (18.2%)

Total Voters: 148
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Border Reiver on 06 Jan 2011, 07:44
I'm voting for Pintsize, Part 2, he's struck once and had the tables turned.  Now he will strike, only to be foiled by the Winslow.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Olymander on 06 Jan 2011, 07:59
Oh, and in terms of minor details... I just noticed that the age lines around Mrs. Reed's mouth are pretty much gone, and have been for a little while.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Wraith11B on 06 Jan 2011, 07:59
I like that as of now, no one has voted for Dora Rage.  Marten and Faye are both raging out and there is a slight chance of HanneloRAGE/turning green.

Fun times.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: warningfromspace on 06 Jan 2011, 08:01
They still dont have their food....
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: DSL on 06 Jan 2011, 08:46
Well, I watched the video of today's installment, Veronica's return to the restaurant, being drawn ... and I gotta tell you, until the dialog balloons went in, it looked like things were going to be a lot worse than the fingernails joke. Try the exercise in your head: subtract the dialog and it looks like Marten is going cold on a wounded Veronica while Tai and Hanners look on in horror, then consternation as the excrement appears to hit the air-management device.
... Damn you, sir, he said to Jeph in admiration.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: cuzsis on 06 Jan 2011, 10:48

- She casually told people *point blank* that she didn't see the relationship lasting. (Not that she ever bothered to tell Marten or anything.)


When was that? (Not saying you're wrong, I just can't remember that happening).

 Argh. I can't seem to find the comic for it (I read through a whole bunch of them not too long ago, so it's kind of a blur.)

 I just seem to remember Faye and Dora talking about her relationship with Marten. Dora was mentioning that she didn't see it lasting forever or anything, but she was enjoying herself.

 I just remember reading it and thinking...Wow, here she was complaining about Faye keeping Marten from other girls and she's essentially doing the same thing now!

 Gotta get back to my homework though, so I can't go searching for it. If I run into it again I'll post it up.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Kugai on 06 Jan 2011, 11:32
CSI?  Hell, let Gibbs know he can find the perfect partner for Abby in Massachusetts.     :-D


And as for Marten;

"Ignition sequence start."
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 06 Jan 2011, 11:37
And as for Marten;

"Ignition sequence start."

What? We're going to see a Mission: Impossible type escape from the restaurant, as young Mr. Reed looks at his mother and says "You've never seen me angry." and suddenly a previously unseen fish tank explodes, washing everyone off their feet as Marten leaps through the window?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Rascal on 06 Jan 2011, 11:48
What Carl-E said above. Saving people from themselves sounds like a noble goal, but in practice it seldom works out for either the prospective rescuer or rescuee. Only Dora can choose to "save herself" here, and if both she and Marten are in a place to resume their relationship after she's saved herself, so much the better. But before then, it's best for both that they go their separate ways for now.


I never condoned nor suggested saving her. But he can be there for her. It's her journey to take but he could be alongside her at the very least. This is the sort of thing you work out together. You don't just pack up your shit and bail.

Before we were married, my wife and I reached a point where we were starting to fight, tensions were rising; it seemed like we were on the verge of breaking up. But instead of doing the easy thing, we talked. We talked a lot. We opened up, we confessed, confided, we opened our minds, and our opinions, and our hearts. And hoo boy, were there some fights and some very uncomfortable conversations. We talked to others, sought help when we needed it, and overcame it. And from that, we were married a year or two later and couldn't be happier.

What Dora and Marten are doing is stupid and foolish. She broke up with him. He's going to find someone else. He's not going to just wait for her to get better, and then everything will be rainbows and unicorns. People either grow together, or they grow apart. Broken up like this? They will grow apart. Change and evolve separately from one another, instead of symbiotically.

So if Dora thinks that she can get some therapy and then come back, that everything will be perfectly fine and she can date Marten again, she's in for a very rude awakening. Dora took the easy, disturbingly naive and cowardly way out, and Marten let her.

She's the one that jumped him like a lioness on a lone gazelle. How is she going to feel seeing him with someone else? Knowing the first, perfect, decent guy that she dated -- the guy that truly loved and cared for her -- is loving and caring for some other girl? If we thought Faye had a hard time of it? Heh.

As for his mother's behavior, I've given up trying to figure out her angle. Whatever it is, it doesn't seem to be helping him very much.

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: ndperfesser on 06 Jan 2011, 11:52
perhaps Mrs Reed picked up on the fact that Dora wants to be punished, and is punishing her by not giver her what she wants?
screwing with her mind instead of physically or out loud or anything

i hope thats what it is, anyway!

Old joke: A masochist is someone who says, "Hurt me" and a sadist is someone who says, "NO!"

(I said it was old, not funny.)
 :-D
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Bologna on 06 Jan 2011, 12:01
Throughout this whole Veronica visits Marten sequence, I've never really felt truly uncomfortable for Marten until just now.  I mean, look at his face.  He's genuinely ticked off.  What the heck is she doing, anyways?  She barely knows Dora, as far as I can tell, and she goes and hunts her down and gives her condolences for breaking up with her own son?  What?  Why is she so concerned about Dora's state of being, especially when she doesn't seem to be that concerned for Marten's?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: sitnspin on 06 Jan 2011, 12:46
Dora stuff

If she did say that, I don't specifically remember it, I would say it is because Dora doesn't expect ANY of her relationships to last. Given her history, I am not surprised. Frankly, I feel the same way. It used to scare me into essentially self-sabotaging them jsut to hurry it along. Every relationship ends somehow, either through break up or death. Now I just enjoy them while they last, since there is no way of knowing how it will turn out.  It seems, according to your half-remembered strip, that Dora was trying to do the same thing. At least until the relationship really started to be important to her and feel good, that's when the fear sets in.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: cesariojpn on 06 Jan 2011, 13:25
Not necessarily true, Hannelore. Veronica could've just used a pistol with a silencer to take Dora out quickly and quietly.

Just sayin'

Or kidnap her and sell her to white slavers and be some harem slave to some Sheik in Dubai.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: raoullefere on 06 Jan 2011, 13:58
IN the midst of whatever the hell I'm doing, stopped in to point out that Veronica didn't physically assault Dora (at least not in the conventional sense), just as I predicted.

On the other hand, I wasn't expecting her to be quite that understanding. Poor Dora. The one person she was counting on to give her the hell she wants to have coming lets her down. Life's such a bitch that way.

That's all. Carry on. (Because I know you need my permission)
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: GeoffTheLlama on 06 Jan 2011, 14:19
What Dora and Marten are doing is stupid and foolish. She broke up with him. He's going to find someone else. He's not going to just wait for her to get better, and then everything will be rainbows and unicorns. People either grow together, or they grow apart. Broken up like this? They will grow apart. Change and evolve separately from one another, instead of symbiotically.

So if Dora thinks that she can get some therapy and then come back, that everything will be perfectly fine and she can date Marten again, she's in for a very rude awakening. Dora took the easy, disturbingly naive and cowardly way out, and Marten let her.

She's the one that jumped him like a lioness on a lone gazelle. How is she going to feel seeing him with someone else? Knowing the first, perfect, decent guy that she dated -- the guy that truly loved and cared for her -- is loving and caring for some other girl? If we thought Faye had a hard time of it? Heh.

That's just it - I'm not so sure she does expect to go back to him when she's 'better'.  Based on how she broke up with him ("We had a good run, sweetie"), I think she fully expects this to be it. Finito. Done.  In light of that, I don't see how this is cowardly or naive - it's just her choice to move on.  And she has the right to make that choice.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 06 Jan 2011, 14:44
All right, as keeper of the SxS archive, I have to step in.

Dora was beating herself up about this relationship since, oh, strip 229. Heck, she didn't even see it lasting right after she kissed Marten. (See 565.)

And, of course, there was her request for Faye to "beat her up" in 568 - which is scarily prescient in retrospect.

Heck, take a look at all the strips Dora's in between "The Kiss" and "The First Date" (through about 620). She was second-guessing the relationship from the fricken START.

 
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Akima on 06 Jan 2011, 19:39
Argh. I can't seem to find the comic for it (I read through a whole bunch of them not too long ago, so it's kind of a blur.)
Pix or it didn't happen!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Sorflakne on 06 Jan 2011, 20:28
You people suck.  Who doesn't want to see Hanners Hulk out?

Or at least pull on the blue biosuit again and pick up a broom and bucket and put her game face on?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Skelepunk on 06 Jan 2011, 21:04
I've made a point to champion waffles on every poll, and so cannot support hannerhulk.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: innermoppet on 06 Jan 2011, 21:24
Quote
I never condoned nor suggested saving her. But he can be there for her. It's her journey to take but he could be alongside her at the very least. This is the sort of thing you work out together. You don't just pack up your shit and bail.

Before we were married, my wife and I reached a point where we were starting to fight, tensions were rising; it seemed like we were on the verge of breaking up. But instead of doing the easy thing, we talked. We talked a lot. We opened up, we confessed, confided, we opened our minds, and our opinions, and our hearts. And hoo boy, were there some fights and some very uncomfortable conversations. We talked to others, sought help when we needed it, and overcame it. And from that, we were married a year or two later and couldn't be happier.

What Dora and Marten are doing is stupid and foolish. She broke up with him. He's going to find someone else. He's not going to just wait for her to get better, and then everything will be rainbows and unicorns. People either grow together, or they grow apart. Broken up like this? They will grow apart. Change and evolve separately from one another, instead of symbiotically.

So if Dora thinks that she can get some therapy and then come back, that everything will be perfectly fine and she can date Marten again, she's in for a very rude awakening. Dora took the easy, disturbingly naive and cowardly way out, and Marten let her.

She's the one that jumped him like a lioness on a lone gazelle. How is she going to feel seeing him with someone else? Knowing the first, perfect, decent guy that she dated -- the guy that truly loved and cared for her -- is loving and caring for some other girl? If we thought Faye had a hard time of it? Heh.

As for his mother's behavior, I've given up trying to figure out her angle. Whatever it is, it doesn't seem to be helping him very much.

Word times 1000.

It sucks when relationships end, no matter what the reason, but the truth is if you don't trust your partner to stick around when times get tough, then you just really DON'T TRUST YOUR PARTNER. She had no faith in the relationship nor in Marten. She was grown up enough to say, I know I have a problem, but not grown up enough to ask him to stick with her while she works through it.

Marten didn't fight for it either (that we know of or saw) but I get the feeling that he was sort of over the whole thing. Yeah he loved her but her bullshit was making him nuts and I'm sure he's sad and depressed and feels like a loser (which is how everyone feels when they get dumped- it's being fired from a relationship) but I also think he probably felt relief. I've been in some terrible relationships and when they were over I was both hurt and relieved. I lost a lot of emotional weight over the  years. I think that's where he is. I'm guessing.

And Veronica is pissing me off. But I have faith that she either has a plan, or that Marten will snap and finally let loose some of that internalized aggression.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: albus on 06 Jan 2011, 21:48
perhaps Mrs Reed picked up on the fact that Dora wants to be punished, and is punishing her by not giver her what she wants?
screwing with her mind instead of physically or out loud or anything

i hope thats what it is, anyway!

Old joke: A masochist is someone who says, "Hurt me" and a sadist is someone who says, "NO!"

(I said it was old, not funny.)
 :-D

and then rorschach dorpped him into the elevartor hole
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 06 Jan 2011, 23:19
Pure and utter speculation, it definitely has to be waffles this time.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Schmorgluck on 06 Jan 2011, 23:23
I've just noticed, on fifth or sixth reading, the "uh-oh" glance Tai and Hanners exchange in panel two. Very nice touch.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 06 Jan 2011, 23:32
Pure and utter speculation, it definitely has to be waffles this time.

I picked it this time too. It's bound to happen one of these days.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: snubnose on 06 Jan 2011, 23:42
Hanners !!!!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 07 Jan 2011, 00:48
Didn't waffles just win a round? Waffles are bitches anyways, strutting around like they own the breakfast world. Vote for a better tomorrow (for Veronica anyway). Vote for using what she brought in her carryon. Vote Sven seduction.

Oh, and for everyone pissed off at the Divine Miss Reed, do regard that Marten isn't worried that his mom talked to Dora, he's worried she overreacted and went all predatory on her. I think Veronica does have a history of crossing Marten's bounds, buuuuut it may be that she's been overprotective in that, rather than not caring, and now she's trying to give him space.

Honestly, I don't know how jealous he'd be of what she actually did. He can be surprisingly adult, our Marty, but lately everyone has forgotten that in a rush to see him act like a two-year-old and our daily exercise of hyperbole.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: snubnose on 07 Jan 2011, 01:46
Yay comic !

I think Marten has a point. :D
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 07 Jan 2011, 01:50
TIBERIUS

Brilliant

Not even his real middle name.

Even better

Using it any.

Bwa ha ha ha ha.

Remember kids, the more in trouble you are, the longer your name will get.

LAW FACT TRUTH
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: pwhodges on 07 Jan 2011, 01:51
Middle names we didn't get...  I guess mine might have been Boniface (I actually got that pope's pre-baptismal name).

To my mind Veronica is now definitely out of order, though.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Delator on 07 Jan 2011, 01:52
"...if his father weren't such a stick in the mud."

Uh-oh.

...I have a feeling that the worst thing Veronica could have done at that point was badmouth Dad.
 
:psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 07 Jan 2011, 02:10
To my mind Veronica is now definitely out of order, though.

I reckon not.

Pushing him to be better by unorthodox means but still within reason.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: cherrypi on 07 Jan 2011, 02:14
"...if his father weren't such a stick in the mud."

Uh-oh.

...I have a feeling that the worst thing Veronica could have done at that point was badmouth Dad.
 
:psyduck:


I...really don't see anything bad coming of what Veronica said. It was just a means to a punchline. I highly doubt Jeph was planning to take that throw-away comment to any form of extension.

Actually, I have no idea where Jeph is heading at all at the moment. And that's why I voted for the scrumptious goodness that is waffles! Because you can't go wrong with waffles. (Unless you burn the waffles).
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 07 Jan 2011, 02:15
I have this sense that the next sweep of posts, from here to the weekend through, will be variations on how Veronica is a HUGE BITCH BLUH BLUH, combined with novellas detailing personal theorems about how Marty was treated as a child and possibly the invocation of child abuse, further opining on how Marten should explode into violent hipster rage, and hyperbole of all stripes. I really hope I'm not right.

That being said, dang, Veronica, you're certainly cracking the proverbial whip...but then again, being way rude to your mother in public is its own kind of out of order.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: themacnut on 07 Jan 2011, 02:18
EDIT: and now to fulfill Dr. ROFLPWN's lowest expectations... :-P

Damn. That last comic was painful to read. Marten is SO utterly dominated by his mother it's sad to watch-it's like he's still 6 years old or something. There will obviously be no Marten Rage, since Mother will not allow it.

It's also obvious from this page why he didn't try to fight for his relationship with Dora. Sure he may have been sick of her insecurities, but a bigger reason may be that he's been conditioned by Mother to do what women say. So if Dora says it's over, then it's over, no matter if he may think otherwise.

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: westrim on 07 Jan 2011, 02:20
I would have been more satisfied if Marten had gone ahead and raged at him mom, right there, instead of being a doormat yet again:

"NO! YOU apologize! You're goddamn right I'm in a bad mood, and you DON'T get to hold being my mother over me like some fucking get-out-of-being-decent card!  I feel like shit right now, and the last thing I needed was you coming here making things WORSE, HITTING on people for me, embarrassing me, making googly eyes at my friends and talking to my ex-girlfriend BEHIND MY BACK as though I couldn't handle it!" (take 1)*breaks down sobbing right there on the sidewalk* (take 2)*runs back home/to Steve's/ fuck it , some park, and cries* (take 3) *pulls out a weapon and gets to matriciding* (In all takes we get a shot of random bystanders and Tainners looking on in horror).

I finally saw Tron in Imax 3d, and it was pretty damn good. Strong story, excellent effects, sympathetic characters on all sides. /end breather

But hey, I don't write the comic, so whatever. I'm still along for the ride, but it sure would be nice if Veronica actually got called on being pretty shitty to him ever since she arrived. Rants aside, I truly don't believe that being a parent gives someone the right to do pretty much anything she's done since she arrived, and especially to someone in a bad place right then. Etc, etc, stopping now before I seem actually ranty.

I have this sense that the next sweep of posts, from here to the weekend through, will be variations on how Veronica is a HUGE BITCH BLUH BLUH, combined with novellas detailing personal theorems about how Marty was treated as a child and possibly the invocation of child abuse, further opining on how Marten should explode into violent hipster rage, and hyperbole of all stripes. I really hope I'm not right.

That being said, dang, Veronica, you're certainly cracking the proverbial whip...but then again, being way rude to your mother in public is its own kind of out of order.

Well hey, when a character's acting badly people are going to comment on it, just like people comment when Hannelore does something adorable. And no, asking a girl to go out with your son in front of him when he just had a breakup is out of order. He's reacting, and I'm a lot more sympathetic to people operating in line with Newton's laws.

Quote
words
No, I'm not going to make a mega post again, I promised myself I would stop that.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: akronnick on 07 Jan 2011, 02:24
Pure and utter speculation, it definitely has to be waffles this time.

I picked it this time too. It's bound to happen one of these days.

Wait.

I thought waffles was a euphemism for sex  :? :-o :|

And Veronica should be so glad that Faye wasn't there when she snapped at Marten like that. She has no idea how close to death she just came.

And yes, Veronica is wah-ah-ah-ah-ayy over the line now. Marten's a grown man with actual feelings. You don't need to humiliate him in front of his friends by talking to him like he's six years old.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 07 Jan 2011, 02:36
Unless that grown man needs to be broken out of sitting around and taking it.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Pika_power on 07 Jan 2011, 02:44
I'm beginning to get the feeling that as readers, we aren't supposed to be sympathising with Marten. :/
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Mr. Doctor on 07 Jan 2011, 02:46
Hmmm... I really don't like this. I mean, Marten is taking a lot of shit from everybody when he's probably in need of a hug more than Dora.

A part of me likes this though since this is interesting for the comic and all... But I would like to see Marten rage at some point because I think he totally deserves it.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: ysth on 07 Jan 2011, 02:49
Nice Star Trek reference.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: parvles on 07 Jan 2011, 03:14
ok, so Veronica goes out of her way to coddle Dora, and then is so poorly in tune with her son to see how far she is pushing him to the point of being obtuse. I mean, it's WEIRD for the mother of your ex-boyfriend to go out of her way to see you, behind her son's back, in order to tell you things are ok. It's weird, and it's especially weird since she and Dora had no relationship other than meeting once... before they were even dating.

Anyway, I am enjoying the comic, it's just frustrating to watch these developments at the moment.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: pwhodges on 07 Jan 2011, 03:15
Unless that grown man needs to be broken out of sitting around and taking it.

You don't do that by treating him like a child.  I had plenty enough cause to be angry with my children at times when they were in their 20s, but I would never have conceived of treating them like that.

Any way, sitting around and taking it?  We're only a day or two post breakup, and we hardly have any idea yet how he is going to move on.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 07 Jan 2011, 03:20
I was thinking more along the lines of Marten generally being a person who "takes it". Sure we don't know how he's going to deal with this but I suspect that his mum is familiar with his form and working from there.

I also don't think his mum is angry with him so I'm not sure how that's relevant. I'll even take the bold move of presuming that Marten is wholly like your children.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: pwhodges on 07 Jan 2011, 03:25
She's only annoyed by the answering back, but her response is simply not appropriate at that age.

(My children were not like Marten - I was more like at that age, though, in several ways.)
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: muffin_of_chaos on 07 Jan 2011, 03:34
I would have been more satisfied if Marten had gone ahead and raged at him mom, right there, instead of being a doormat yet again:

"NO! YOU apologize! You're fucking right I'm in a bad mood, and you DON'T get to hold being my mother over me like some fucking get-out-of-being-decent card!  I feel like shit right now, and the last thing I needed was you coming here making things WORSE, HITTING on people for me, embarrassing me, making googly eyes at my friends and talking to my ex-girlfriend BEHIND MY BACK as though I couldn't handle it! You're goddamn right I'm in a bad mood, and you don't get to hold being my mother over me like some fucking get out of apologizing free card!"

Well done.
I feel like this would be a more justified response than meek obedience, as long as he wasn't too vehement about it.
Veronica might be doing the best possible thing for Marten right now.  I don't know, I'm not a doctor.  But her awesomeness should not be confused with her having some sort of moral superiority here, as if Marten is still her dependent.
Unless he is.  I'm not sure whether or not he's supported by mother.

I would like to see Marten get a bit more love.  It feels wrong that we've seen Dora get hugged nine hundred percent more per comic than him.
But even if it feels wrong, it makes sense, for it seems that--at the moment--Marten doesn't actually respond to the sympathy others have for his plight.  Too self-focused.
Been there myself.  Makes the love he gets sort of less relevant than Dora's: she seems to want it and accept it more.  Even while fearing worse.
Very common for dumpers worried about the future of their social circle.

ok, so Veronica goes out of her way to coddle Dora, and then is so poorly in tune with her son to see how far she is pushing him to the point of being obtuse. I mean, it's WEIRD for the mother of your ex-boyfriend to go out of her way to see you, behind her son's back, in order to tell you things are ok. It's weird, and it's especially weird since she and Dora had no relationship other than meeting once... before they were even dating.

Anyway, I am enjoying the comic, it's just frustrating to watch these developments at the moment.

Part of Jeph's genius is that he's extremely aware of the individual quirks of his characters; he doesn't ever try to shift them into author-avatars or significantly break character for mere plot device.  That I can remember.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 07 Jan 2011, 04:08
Certainly when a character acts in a way people don't like they're going to comment on it, but it would be cool if we could, you know, tone down some of the hyperbole that goes on around here. Like in the Marigold thread where she got called a sociopath for not being aware of other's feelings, or like the general perception that Dora is an avatar of Echidna, or the calling Faye a soul-killing parasite, or the running line of how Marten is going to explode and THEY WILL HAVE IT COMING ALL OF THEM.

I mean, a lot of the time things are being used for humor, and are entirely artifice. I have a feeling much of Veronica's embarrassing behavior was supposed to be taken in a lighthearted, funny manner, and only now are we anywhere near Serious Business. Not everything is a federal fucking issue, guys.

Addendum: Please don't think I'm trying to tell you what to discuss or how to think; if you want to have novella-posts about how awful V is as a mom, you go right on and do it, no one can stop you but hodges. I just think the acrimony levels here get really high over the silliest bullshit, and we could all stand to settle down in here.

I'm actually wracking my brain trying to figure out what people would think were good things for Mom to do, pre cracking the whip (this comic). I mean, all things considered, she's been balancing kindly mom with 'my boy is an adult' really well up until Marten's snarky horseshit set her off just now.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: themacnut on 07 Jan 2011, 04:44
I highly doubt we'll be seeing any Marten Rage, not at his mother anyway. Not when he cowers at a verbal smackdown in response to a bit of snark. He'll NEVER let himself go off on his Mom THAT way.

More likely he'll just wait 'till she leaves and get wasted again.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: AngryCallCenterAgent on 07 Jan 2011, 04:58
BEST. MIDDLE NAME. EVER.

And I only voted for waffles because I know they're Belgian.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: snubnose on 07 Jan 2011, 05:16
I thought waffles was a euphemism for sex  :? :-o :|
Ugh. :oops:

Can you please stop trying to kill waffles as a food for me ? :-o


I'm beginning to get the feeling that as readers, we aren't supposed to be sympathising with Marten. :/
I'm pretty sure we're supposed to make up our own mind about the comic. :wink:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Destenoth on 07 Jan 2011, 05:33
I've been drawn out of lurking cause I wanted to draw attention to something that irks me; the timing of Veronica's trip to visit Dora. A couple of people have mentioned it not being cool that she did it behind Marten's back, but I find it more irritating that she did it in the middle of a dinner she was having with him and his friends. The fact that she bears Dora no ill will and wants to reassure her and offer her condolences is fine, but couldn't she have waited till tomorrow, instead of leaving Marten at a restaurant to go do it? True, she didn't leave him completely alone or anything, but still not cool.

As for her little parental discipline outburst, I really don't know what on earth is going on there. :psyduck: Seriously messed up, in my opinion. The stuff that's come before could be what Marten needs (I'm young and inexperienced, so I'm unwilling to commit myself to a position on that as of yet), but this is just dodgy.

Also, my first poll! :-D

I wanted to vote for Waffles, but I think Pintsize is more likely. Though I suppose it depends. If, by the time Veronica leaves, things have been sorted out and Marten is on the mend, maybe there won't be Pintsize. But if Veronica leaves while Marten is still down, I wouldn't put it past Jeph to hit him with another dose of robotic douchebaggery.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: pwhodges on 07 Jan 2011, 05:37
Certainly when a character acts in a way people don't like they're going to comment on it, but it would be cool if we could, you know, tone down some of the hyperbole that goes on around here.

Of course, one aspect of this is the wide range of people's experiences and experience.  Some people haven't yet fully learnt to understand that their reaction is not the only possible or even sensible one.  As this forum includes contributors ranging from angry teenagers to experienced parents, I am inclined to be indulgent to extreme views - given that the discussion that results may be usefully educational as well as (hopefully) interesting.  Of course, a certain degree of respect in language is expected, which is why that thread got locked a few hours ago - even then I hesitated, because I could see a valid discussion of an extreme view possibly coming from it.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Pika_power on 07 Jan 2011, 05:41
I'm actually wracking my brain trying to figure out what people would think were good things for Mom to do, pre cracking the whip (this comic). I mean, all things considered, she's been balancing kindly mom with 'my boy is an adult' really well up until Marten's snarky horseshit set her off just now.
Buying tickets before considering his feelings on the matter, or whether or not he'd want her around after a breakup. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1810)

Clearly embarrassing him in front of a cute waitress, despite his protests, the day after he's had a breakup and probably doesn't want to consider anything new. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1821)

Demonstrates either social unawareness, or has fun at Marten's expense, depending on how favourably you look at it. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1824)

Brings along baby pictures, which Marten has already expressed distaste for in the past. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1825) She waits for him to leave, because she knows he'd disapprove of her actions. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1827)

Touching raw nerves by openly flirting with Marten's ex's brother. Judging from his reaction here, going off to sleep is Marten's way of dealing with the stress from his mother. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1831)

Again openly disregards his feelings and lies to him, so she can go off and comfort his ex. Completely inappropriate behaviour. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1831) When he finds out, she denies it, and then, instead of apologising, defends her actions. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1834)

All of this not including the most recent strip, which we agree is out of line.

In contrast, she managed to have a nice conversation with Dora. So she succeeds at comforting the person who put her son in the state he's in. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1833)

Something along the lines of that with Marten is what she should do. But that's not what people are complaining about. The problem is what she shouldn't do is exactly what she has done. Namely, everything I've just linked to.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: pwhodges on 07 Jan 2011, 05:46
I thought waffles was a euphemism for sex  :? :-o :|

They have, of course, an (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=179) established (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=510) place (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=524) in the comic.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Mustakyy on 07 Jan 2011, 06:02
Uh oh.

Somehow, while Ms. Reeds visit has been very entertaining to observe, this wasn't. I do understand that being snarky to your parents isn't the best behaviour (yea, its kinda opposite, i know), but knowing the whole situation at hand, Martens reaction is also quite understandable. He's just crashed and burned from something he held quite important to him, he's suffering consequences from a bender (both from the liquor and the KO, even thou he doesen't know about latter) and somehow i get the feeling that lunch and dinner weren't exactly peachy. And still, he gets totaly chewed up from one measly snarky remark? Imho, kind of double standard. I understand that she is genuinely trying to help out Marten, but the methods she's using dont seem to work as well as planned (well, he ain't moping any more, but im not sure that anger is that much better option either?).


It's also obvious from this page why he didn't try to fight for his relationship with Dora. Sure he may have been sick of her insecurities, but a bigger reason may be that he's been conditioned by Mother to do what women say. So if Dora says it's over, then it's over, no matter if he may think otherwise.

Think you might be on to something with that observation. Makes sense, when you think of it (well atleast to me).


Certainly when a character acts in a way people don't like they're going to comment on it, but it would be cool if we could, you know, tone down some of the hyperbole that goes on around here.

.........snip.......

I'm actually wracking my brain trying to figure out what people would think were good things for Mom to do, pre cracking the whip (this comic). I mean, all things considered, she's been balancing kindly mom with 'my boy is an adult' really well up until Marten's snarky horseshit set her off just now.

Et tu, Brute. (sorry, couldn't resist  :-D)
You had quite good point there, and while I may disagree on some of em, I think that was quite accurate analysis on the hyperbolic reactions.

Im really hoping that the discussion won't transform from nice and civil (well mostly nice and civil) to a river of flame and rage( a.k.a The Thread That Should Not Be Named ) all over again. We may have different opinions, that's good, but please, let's not exaggrate things too much. (thou im hoping that casual smart-assery will be tolerated  :wink:)
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 07 Jan 2011, 06:21
(raises hand slightly)

Point of order?

Uhm, can we stop with the suicide references for a while?

After what happened in Omaha?

...Please?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 07 Jan 2011, 06:35
What the hell happened in Omaha?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: westrim on 07 Jan 2011, 06:35

I mean, a lot of the time things are being used for humor, and are entirely artifice. I have a feeling much of Veronica's embarrassing behavior was supposed to be taken in a lighthearted, funny manner, and only now are we anywhere near Serious Business. Not everything is a federal fucking issue, guys.

The problem is that this isn't a humorous time for Marten. Humor can be worked in, sure (like it was in The Reveal at the beginning of the 500s), but it doesn't work when it's playing directly off of someone who just got hurt badly and keeps on flipping our empathy switches.

linkage!
I bow before your link-fu, and you put it much better than I could have.

(though I'm hoping that casual smart-assery will be tolerated  :wink:)
Me too, or I'm screwed.

(raises hand slightly)
Point of order?
Uhm, can we stop with the suicide references for a while?
After what happened in Omaha?
...Please?
Omaha? *Googles* Oh. Wait, who mentioned suicide? And how long after someone suicides badly in Real Life can we mention it again? Because it might be a long wait...

EDIT:
What the hell happened in Omaha?
Google happened.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Odin on 07 Jan 2011, 06:40
(raises hand slightly)

Point of order?

Uhm, can we stop with the suicide references for a while?

After what happened in Omaha?

...Please?

No? Thousands of people commit suicide every single day (not to mention the atrocities that happen in Darfur), so stop being so sensitive. This is the Internet, grow thicker skin. I can guarantee you that somewhere else on the Internet someone is making a "tribute" video to the news footage of what happened in Omaha set to Benny Hill music.

As for the comic, I'm thinking Veronica is acting the way she is because she's operating on the assumption that Dora dumped Marten because of something stupid Marten did and not because of how things actually went down because she doesn't know how things actually went down.

She's thinking Dora dumped Marten based on a (correct) view of Marten's past behavior in relationships and doesn't know or realize Dora's own insecurities and the role they played this time. In this light, her actions towards Marten actually make some sense.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 07 Jan 2011, 06:43
Googled Omaha suicide, first result was a suicide bombing in Kandahar. Methinks googles UK weighting is a little skewed. What happens when you google it in the US?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: westrim on 07 Jan 2011, 06:47
No? Thousands of people commit suicide every single day (not to mention the atrocities that happen in Darfur), so stop being so sensitive. This is the Internet, grow thicker skin. I can guarantee you that somewhere else on the Internet someone is making a "tribute" video to the news footage of what happened in Omaha set to Benny Hill music.

As for the comic, I'm thinking Veronica is acting the way she is because she's operating on the assumption that Dora dumped Marten because of something stupid Marten did and not because of how things actually went down because she doesn't know how things actually went down.

She's thinking Dora dumped Marten based on a (correct) view of Marten's past behavior in relationships and doesn't know or realize Dora's own insecurities and the role they played this time. In this light, her actions towards Marten actually make some sense.
Most of them don't take others with them, though. and there are not 365,000+ suicides every year. Try tens of people.

As for Veronica, no her actions do not make sense because she can ask him. I have no sympathy for mistakes made due to assumptions.

Googled Omaha suicide, first result was a suicide bombing in Kandahar. Methinks googles UK weighting is a little skewed. What happens when you google it in the US?
This (http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/9809/captureou.png)
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 07 Jan 2011, 06:53
OK, found that now. There's not been any coverage of that over in the UK but due to less relevance over here we really don't hear about US school shootings anymore. Pretty tragic but really not worth suspending use of the word suicide for. After all, suicide bombings are almost a daily occurence in the current middle-east war zones with far graver consequences and they don't stop us going about our business.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 07 Jan 2011, 07:01
Most of them don't take others with them, though. and there are not 365,000+ suicides every year. Try tens of people.


The World Health Organisation estimate that 1,000,000 die from suicide every year.

That's a tad more than 365,000.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Odin on 07 Jan 2011, 07:04
Googled Omaha suicide, first result was a suicide bombing in Kandahar. Methinks googles UK weighting is a little skewed. What happens when you google it in the US?

First result is a story about some kid in Omaha murdering the principal and vice principal of his school before committing suicide, sub-controversy about how he posted on Facebook saying he was going to do it and nobody reported it to authorities.

Most of them don't take others with them, though. and there are not 365,000+ suicides every year. Try tens of people.

Actually, there is an average of 3,000 people committing suicide every day world wide (source (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2007/s16/en/index.html)).

Quote
As for Veronica, no her actions do not make sense because she can ask him. I have no sympathy for mistakes made due to assumptions.

So you're saying she never asked him why Dora dumped him during the phone call, eh?

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: westrim on 07 Jan 2011, 07:25
Most of them don't take others with them, though. and there are not 365,000+ suicides every year. Try tens of people.
The World Health Organization estimate that 1,000,000 die from suicide every year.
That's a tad more than 365,000.
The world is a tad more than the Unites States, which is what I thought we were talking about (that is, American current events.) We have about 90 a day, or 'tens'. Still adds up to 33,000 and change over the course of a year, though.

First result is a story about some kid in Omaha murdering the principal and vice principal of his school before committing suicide, sub-controversy about how he posted on Facebook saying he was going to do it and nobody reported it to authorities.

Actually, there is an average of 3,000 people committing suicide every day world wide (source (http://www.who.int/mediacentre/news/statements/2007/s16/en/index.html)).

Excellent job repeating what others have already provided. There's a reason that red text about posts since you started typing happens.

Quote
So you're saying she never asked him why Dora dumped him during the phone call, eh?
No I'm not. That would fall under "asking him", so unless he was extraordinarily unclear or only said "she dumped me", she would already know it was her issues that ended it. Or, she didn't ask him. Or someone is going to do a Phoenix Wright and object on the grounds of people rarely communicating effectively, to which I say that's why she asks who ended it and why before sneaking around behind his back based on old assumptions.

But I don't think that's how things went down. I don't know how much she knows about what happened, Jeph didn't tell us. So we'll see.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jedraft on 07 Jan 2011, 07:42
Jesus, how many cringes does it take to get to the center of a Marten-Pop?

I can't take this lady anymore.  She needs to be hit by a bus, so Marten can collect insurance money to pay for his lifetime of therapy.  And here I thought at last he'd grown a pair by finally dumping Dora, (who also needs to get hit by a bus, or have some kind of Road To Damascus moment that turns her around 180 degrees.)  No, he's still playing sub to every woman he meets, and Mommy Dearest is a complete HORROR, here. 

And is happy about it.

And all the other girls are happy-happy giggle-giggle at watching the poor young man being TORTURED.   That is the word, actually.  It is literal emotional abuse. 

Not even Faye gives him ANY slack, didja notice?   All the women seem to get huggies and understanding when being completely outrageous, but a falling-down-DRUNK and obviously impotent and harmless Marten gets DECKED for making a stupid self-loathing pass at her.

You know why Veronica went to offer solidarity with Dora?

They're TWO OF A KIND!!!!

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Bologna on 07 Jan 2011, 08:13
And here I thought at last he'd grown a pair by finally dumping Dora


Er, Dora dumped him.  Why would you think he grew a pair?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 07 Jan 2011, 08:20
I agree; this is starting to aggravate me. I'm starting to really dislike Ms. Reed and I can't take much more of Marten being pissed on so mercilessly.

I like how she just calls him that even though it's not his real middle name. I can just see their house growing up:

Mrs. Reed: Marten Tiberius Reed!

Mr. Reed: Dammit, Veronica, use his REAL middle name!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: The Seldom Killer on 07 Jan 2011, 08:23
I bet it's Timothy, or Nigel or something equally boring.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Theron on 07 Jan 2011, 08:23
Marten needs to grow a spine.  Today's comic sent me over the line to outright distaste for the current storyline.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Odin on 07 Jan 2011, 08:29
The world is a tad more than the Unites States, which is what I thought we were talking about (that is, American current events.) We have about 90 a day, or 'tens'. Still adds up to 33,000 and change over the course of a year, though.

The guy that brought up the murder/suicide in Omaha was talking about American events, the rest of us are pointing out that there is more than America in the world and you really might as well drop this entire argument because stuff like this:

Quote
Excellent job repeating what others have already provided. There's a reason that red text about posts since you started typing happens.

Just makes you look like a gigantic crybaby about being proven wrong about something. There is a reason there are time-stamps on posts and it is perfectly permissible for someone to post the same argument if they're providing different sources in their posts for the same conclusion and are within a few minutes of each other (I provided an actual linked source in addition to the argument, where the other posts simply stated their argument).

EDIT: Basically, you're being a huge hypocrite by saying that I'm not contributing anything to the discussion when you're doing exactly the same thing in the very post where you make the criticism.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 07 Jan 2011, 08:30
Jesus, how many cringes does it take to get to the center of a Marten-Pop?

I can't take this lady anymore.  She needs to be hit by a bus, so Marten can collect insurance money to pay for his lifetime of therapy.  And here I thought at last he'd grown a pair by finally dumping Dora, (who also needs to get hit by a bus, or have some kind of Road To Damascus moment that turns her around 180 degrees.)  No, he's still playing sub to every woman he meets, and Mommy Dearest is a complete HORROR, here.  

And is happy about it.

And all the other girls are happy-happy giggle-giggle at watching the poor young man being TORTURED.   That is the word, actually.  It is literal emotional abuse.  

Not even Faye gives him ANY slack, didja notice?   All the women seem to get huggies and understanding when being completely outrageous, but a falling-down-DRUNK and obviously impotent and harmless Marten gets DECKED for making a stupid self-loathing pass at her.

You know why Veronica went to offer solidarity with Dora?

They're TWO OF A KIND!!!!



Oh look, here is a crystal clear example of the sort of hyperbole I was talking about! Yay. The bar has been set.  :psyduck:

Pika_power: I think the problem there is that it's a very different animal, comforting your emotionally prickly, sullen son while allowing him his space as a fellow adult from telling his ex you're not going to hunt her down and that you think she's not a Huge Bitch BLUH BLUH. She's kind of trying to play it by ear, and Marten isn't making it easy for her.

As an adult, it's his responsibility to say things like "No, mom, I can't handle lunch yet," or "I need a hug, mom, I'm not okay", and while I continue to think the whole embarrassment parade is harmless fun myself, (especially the Sven thing! All she saw was a chance to reenact The Graduate, she didn't know that was Dora's bro) even if you don't think so you must note he has put up all the resistance of a wet paper bag with snarky horseshit written on it. While we know that Mom clearly has authority still,  and seems to wield it bluntly, it's not on her to know exactly what the boy is thinking or doing or wants.

I do think maybe Faye should've come to dinner. She might've kept things calmer all round, ironically.
 
Westrim: It's true, this is a hard time for Marten, but we aren't Marten! It's good to empathize, to a degree, but one must also recall that this is a silly slice of life comic that is generally pretty relentlessly lighthearted, and sometimes Marten will be trod on by Jeph for the sake of our laughter, and he'll bounce back from that like nothing even happened! Not every little thing in
QC is a piece of some greater whole, nor is every slight on our beleaguered boy a contribution to his mental breakdown.

Hodges: *bows* You are wiser and more patient than I, and I think that indulgence is necessary: as you say, our contributors are of many walks and stripes. I think, up until this last post, the dialogue (on the comic anyhow) was going rather well.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: pwhodges on 07 Jan 2011, 08:52
While the discussion remains short of being offensive, I feel that there are sufficient people giving a measured view of the story's development to counteract some extreme views.  I wouldn't like to wave a stick at people's merely extreme views - unless their way of expressing them gets out of hand.

I do feel sad, though, for people whose response to so much is "grow a pair", as if testosterone were the only way to resolve any man's issues.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: rje on 07 Jan 2011, 08:54
Marten needs to grow a mustache.

Burt Reynolds style bby

edit: I should probably actually discuss instead of interject my unwitty retorts  :laugh:

I partly agree with the good Dr, I think Jeph's first want is to make with the funny, and I'm not sure much of Veronica and Marten's interactions are supposed to point to any particular Thing. This last comic though, maybe. His reaction - cringing up like a little kid - bothered me. I hope one of the other two pulls him to the side to point out how that appeared, and he can talk to his mom about it.

But it made me realize that I had a pre-set anticipation of his mom Fixing Everything - being like super intuitive and a Super Mom and just super all around, and y'know what? Maybe she's not. Parents aren't infallible, and maybe she's not actually that good at reading the situation, or her son's emotions or needs, and she doesn't actually know what she's doing. She hasn't lived near her son for awhile, so perhaps she's still seeing him like she used to, before he moved away. Parental blinders. She doesn't really know Adult Marten like she should.

Whether or not this Means Anything or gets commented upon or resolved is still to be seen of course.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Murphoid on 07 Jan 2011, 09:15
OMG, What did Martens Mom do to him?  I can't imagine anyone being so incredibly passive to respond to barked orders from their Mom like that as an adult.  Could you imagine if your mom ordered you to apologize in front of your friends like that as an adult.

I mean yes be nice to your mom, but a "Mom, could we discuss this in private please?" would be the least response I would expect from an adult.  Marten is far more beaten down than I ever expected.  I have lost a whole lot of respect for Mrs. Reed.  She is off my favorite characters list.

Nice lil joke about Tiberius tho.  My eldest son is named James.  That is because my wife VETOed Luke.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Merrick on 07 Jan 2011, 09:20
Basically, I have grown an intense dislike for Marten's mother over the last couple of weeks, climaxing with this.

What a whore.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: pwhodges on 07 Jan 2011, 09:23
I don't think you mean "whore", in any sense of the word I know.

Marten needs to grow a mustache.

Marten's moustache (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=623).
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: rje on 07 Jan 2011, 09:31
I don't think you mean "whore", in any sense of the word I know.

Marten needs to grow a mustache.

Marten's moustache (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=623).

That is not like Burt Reynolds at all. >:I
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 07 Jan 2011, 09:59
By his own admission, Marten is unable to grow anything more than a creepy Maths teacher's moustache. And honestly, if he could he'd look more like Tom Selleck than Burt Reynolds (and this is old Tom Selleck).

Back to the comic, Veronica is playing a very dangerous game and is likely to seriously damage her relationship with Marten. Yes, you should never talk to either of your parents like that, but at the same time there are certain limitations to how a parent should treat their own children. I mean, Marten has done alright for himself, travelling across the country to a city where he had quite possibly only one friend, no job and not a lot of money, to having a nice place, a (usually) decent group of friends, a job which keeps him clothed and food on the table, he is a man and fully capable of taking care of himself.

Thats what she should be seeing, unfortunately, instead it's Marten in his dinosaur Halloween costume and until she can see past that, all Veronica is going to do is more harm than good, and she'll push Marten away.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: cuzsis on 07 Jan 2011, 09:59
(raises hand slightly)

Point of order?

Uhm, can we stop with the suicide references for a while?

After what happened in Omaha?

...Please?

No? Thousands of people commit suicide every single day (not to mention the atrocities that happen in Darfur), so stop being so sensitive. This is the Internet, grow thicker skin. I can guarantee you that somewhere else on the Internet someone is making a "tribute" video to the news footage of what happened in Omaha set to Benny Hill music.

As for the comic, I'm thinking Veronica is acting the way she is because she's operating on the assumption that Dora dumped Marten because of something stupid Marten did and not because of how things actually went down because she doesn't know how things actually went down.

She's thinking Dora dumped Marten based on a (correct) view of Marten's past behavior in relationships and doesn't know or realize Dora's own insecurities and the role they played this time. In this light, her actions towards Marten actually make some sense.

 I'm glad you posted this bit.

 B/c frankly, while each individual strip can be taken by itself to be amusing/light hearted ect... the whole over arcing storyline has become completely confusing in terms of character development for me. Characters are doing stuff that doesn't make sense based on our knowledge of them and their relationships.

 Sure, a lot of it is funny and unexpected in terms of individual installments, but when you put them together it's one big, WTF?!  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Murphoid on 07 Jan 2011, 10:03
I mean, Marten has done alright for himself, travelling across the country to a city where he had quite possibly only one friend, no job and not a lot of money, to having a nice place, a (usually) decent group of friends, a job which keeps him clothed and food on the table, he is a man and fully capable of taking care of himself.

Honestly, I can't make myself believe that someone working in a college library makes enough to live on.  He might get an allowance from his mom, but still this kind of thing from Mrs. Reed is bang out of order.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Murphoid on 07 Jan 2011, 10:06
Sure, a lot of it is funny and unexpected in terms of individual installments, but when you put them together it's one big, WTF?!  :psyduck:

But that happens in real life too sometimes.  People sometimes act different than you'd expect.  Sometimes all at the same time.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Odin on 07 Jan 2011, 10:10
I wonder why Hanners has stayed mostly silent throughout all this? She's usually much quicker to point out bullshit.

She's probably still hung up on wondering what Marten told his mom about her, thus not very likely to get angry at whatever unjust shit Marten gets from his mom.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Skewbrow on 07 Jan 2011, 10:23

That is not like Burt Reynolds at all. >:I

I'm afraid  this may be the best he can do. (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1507) Doesn't quite match the image you had in mind, does it? But don't you think Chaplin style would be more fitting for Marten? Dodges an upper-cut delivered by the local fashion police.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: thomshouse on 07 Jan 2011, 10:29
Given the way his mom's treated him this whole visit, yeah, it's no wonder Marten gets crapped on and takes it so much.

In my opinion, the most interesting thing is what we don't see here: Faye.  I don't think Tai or Hannelore would either one be willing to call Veronica out on her treatment of Marten...  And through no fault of their own. I think most people let family squabbles remain family squabbles, y'know, short of physical abuse and what not.

But I believe Faye would be so willing.  And I wouldn't be surprised next week if we see Marten slump in the door, lets out a demoralized moan about his mom, and we do get to see, as the poll puts it: FAYE RAAAAAAAAAAAAGE!
Title: Ad
Post by: Swedish Chef on 07 Jan 2011, 10:39
And my new year's resolve was to keep on lurking. :-D

Here is my input on Jeph' masterful writing.

Re : Veronica/Marten.

I think some people are reading too much into V's reaction in the last comic. She raised Marten on her own since the divorce when he was 10, she may states to others that he's a grown up but, in her eyes, he'll never be anything else than the memory of a better time, than a young child depending on her guidance; hence a reason she brought the picture book in the first place. One can be 20, one can be 40, one can be 60, your mother will never see you a day older than 7. A side reaction here is the human emotion not to be remembered one gets older. Admitting that Marten has any reason to talk back means admitting Veronica is getting old herself.

As to where the storyline goes, everybody cannot but notice how unhealthy the trend is. Who's at fault here doesn't matter much. Dora has to face her own demons, which is always better than facing Faye's angry murloc face. Veronica, by her line of work alone, has more than enough experience in gauging other' emotion but this week proves that she cannot read her own son, a very upsetting thing to realize. Marten is under tremendous pressure, with no relief in sight if Pintsize can help it. How he'll react is up to Jeph, worst case scenario is ending one's life...or joining the Foreign Legion.

The one shining ray of hope  this whole week was Hanner. Look at her face when she looks at Marten, she may be the one who will offer help/shoulder/whatsnot that will make him go through the whole ordeal.



In the meanwhile...well, back to lurking.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: tomart on 07 Jan 2011, 11:06
"NO! YOU apologize! You're goddamn right I'm in a bad mood, and you DON'T get to hold being my mother over me like some fucking get-out-of-being-decent card!  I feel like shit right now, and the last thing I needed was you coming here making things WORSE...!

 ...it sure would be nice if Veronica actually got called on being pretty shitty to him ever since she arrived. Rants aside, I truly don't believe that being a parent gives someone the right to do pretty much anything she's done since she arrived...

...when a character's acting badly people are going to comment on it...

It's gotten beyond uncomfortable, rude, insensitive, & harmful, to rediculous.  I hope Jeph has some good rationale or fallout for Veronica's Marten-abuse, but I can't imagine what it could be.

Maybe he's making more/stronger points about how women abuse men (and other women go along with it) which I do think need to be made, but jeez...
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Kugai on 07 Jan 2011, 11:31
Now all he needs is a Starship.


She really is beginning to piss me off now.  I don't know what her game is, or whether she's just disconnected in regards to Marten's feelings, but I swear to got someone needs to deck this woman before she leaves.

I hope it's Faye.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: tomart on 07 Jan 2011, 11:38
I mean, a lot of the time things are being used for humor, and are entirely artifice. I have a feeling much of Veronica's embarrassing behavior was supposed to be taken in a lighthearted, funny manner...


If mom's obliviousness to his feelings and all these Marten-embarrassments were supposed to be amusing & lighthearted, then why does one little (JUSTIFIED!) snark by him, justify SERIOUS PUNISHMENT and even MORE embarrassment in front of his friends??  

Double Standard!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Odin on 07 Jan 2011, 11:42
Now all he needs is a Starship.


She really is beginning to piss me off now.  I don't know what her game is, or whether she's just disconnected in regards to Marten's feelings, but I swear to got someone needs to deck this woman before she leaves.

I hope it's Faye.

Please, nobody is going to attack a professional dominatrix. They'd be too afraid to go to sleep again if they didn't kill her!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: GeoffTheLlama on 07 Jan 2011, 11:46
Back to the comic, Veronica is playing a very dangerous game and is likely to seriously damage her relationship with Marten. Yes, you should never talk to either of your parents like that, but at the same time there are certain limitations to how a parent should treat their own children. I mean, Marten has done alright for himself, travelling across the country to a city where he had quite possibly only one friend, no job and not a lot of money, to having a nice place, a (usually) decent group of friends, a job which keeps him clothed and food on the table, he is a man and fully capable of taking care of himself.

While I suspect this is just Veronica being Veronica and even if it does push Marten to HULK OUT at some point he won't actually, you know, shun his mom (I mean, she's MOM), I agree with about every other point you've made thus far.

At first I thought this was just going to be a short-lived, "oh, even dominatrixes can be embarrassing overbearing mothers!" gag, but now it's just gotten uncomfortable.   While I wouldn't call it abuse by any stretch of the imagination (nor do I suspect that Veronica was ever abusive toward her son), it is pretty insensitive.  

I'm curious where this is going now.  I'd actually kind of like to see Hanners play Hannersmom with Marten's mom and give her a bit of a 'hey, really? wanna stop that now?' kind of talk, only because I think Faye is still intimidated by her (and I'd honestly just like to see some more Hanners development because she's a really well-written and developed character).
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: MamiyaOtaru on 07 Jan 2011, 12:12
I was actually glad to see him get a little discipline.  His whining was getting on my nerves.

ohwait  evil parents!  keeping us down!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Pika_power on 07 Jan 2011, 12:34
Pika_power: I think the problem there is that it's a very different animal, comforting your emotionally prickly, sullen son while allowing him his space as a fellow adult from telling his ex you're not going to hunt her down and that you think she's not a Huge Bitch BLUH BLUH. She's kind of trying to play it by ear, and Marten isn't making it easy for her.

As an adult, it's his responsibility to say things like "No, mom, I can't handle lunch yet," or "I need a hug, mom, I'm not okay", and while I continue to think the whole embarrassment parade is harmless fun myself, (especially the Sven thing! All she saw was a chance to reenact The Graduate, she didn't know that was Dora's bro) even if you don't think so you must note he has put up all the resistance of a wet paper bag with snarky horseshit written on it. While we know that Mom clearly has authority still,  and seems to wield it bluntly, it's not on her to know exactly what the boy is thinking or doing or wants.

I do think maybe Faye should've come to dinner. She might've kept things calmer all round, ironically.
Show me one strip in the recent arc which includes her "allowing him space as a fellow adult". No, the nap doesn't count, as she just wanted him out of the way so she could show baby photos.

Veronica knows perfectly well what she's doing goes against Marten's wishes, and she doesn't care. Even if I give her the benefit of the doubt, and assume that she's just too stupid to pick up on the social cues of "Mom. Mom! MOM. MOM. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1821)", and the thought doesn't cross her mind that trying to pick up her son's ex's brother less than a week after the breakup might be a tad uncomfortable for Marten, nor does him walking away in disgust make her realise, when even Tai and Hanners have, (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1831) there's still clear evidence of her disregarding Marten's feelings. When he does explain to her that what she's doing is making him uncomfortable, she brushes it off as his being "uptight". (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1823) She did the same at the restaurant. You can argue about her wanting to make sure Dora's okay all you like; lying to her son to skip out on him in the middle of dinner to comfort his ex not only demonstrates blatant ignorance for Marten's emotions, it shows that she knows what she's doing doesn't meet her son's approval (or else she'd have told him), but does it anyway, and (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1832) when caught, she doesn't admit to her fault. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1834)

There's tough love, then there's having no respect for boundaries set by someone close to you. She has passed the point where the 'tough love' defence stands up, and it's gotten to the stage where the half-hearted protests of 'Veronca Vance works in mysterious ways" don't cut the mustard. At best, for most of the incidences you can argue that she's socially defunct, but for other cases, where we know that she knows that she's going against Marten's wishes (such as waiting for him to leave before showing baby pictures (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1825)) we can see that she flat-out doesn't care what Marten's opinion is.

Hell, I wouldn't put it past her to do something like looking up porn on his computer, even if he specifically asked her not to. Take from that what you will.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 07 Jan 2011, 12:55
Honestly, I can't make myself believe that someone working in a college library makes enough to live on.  He might get an allowance from his mom, but still this kind of thing from Mrs. Reed is bang out of order.

The average college trained librarian earns about $50000 a year, so I'm guessing Marten earns about half of that (That probably includes the 30% increase he got when he and Dora walked in on the committee members in the copy room). Assuming Marten and Faye split the rent 50/50, he can probably just about get by if he doesn't buy many extragences (If I remember correctly, the last major thing he bought was the guitar with the bet he made with Beatrice). I mean, we never see him having any problem paying rent or buying food, or at least to the degree where he has to go to his parents for a handout.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Heliphyneau on 07 Jan 2011, 13:02
I'd actually kind of like to see Hanners play Hannersmom with Marten's mom and give her a bit of a 'hey, really? wanna stop that now?' kind of talk

I'm hoping to see more of that 'innocent outsider observation' Hanners can do so well -- remember when Marten and Steve are bitching about women and she calmly points out that what they're doing is not constructive?  (Sorry, I have no link-fu.)  I could see her making a clear-headed statement about both Marten and his Mom that would cut through the bullshit of both their actions.

I was actually glad to see him get a little discipline.  His whining was getting on my nerves.

Ms. Reed's reaction to his whining/snark is pretty understandable, yeah.  Lacking in empathy, but understandable.  His behavior may have been reminding her of his teen years.  Both of them could stand to be a bit better at communicating.

Veronica knows perfectly well what she's doing goes against Marten's wishes, and she doesn't care.

I tend to think it's more that she's never really paid much attention to whether she's crossing Marten's boundaries.  She's not stupid, but she's not being deliberately malicious -- she just doesn't really understand why he has boundaries and hang-ups that she does not.  She's a person; people are flawed.  For example, she sought to avoid upsetting him by being duplicitous and talking to Dora behind his back, which was not a good idea.  And Marten is snarking at her instead of directly telling her how he feels and what he wants, which was also not a good idea (though he has told her some things he doesn't want, ie: for his Mom to pick up a waitress for him).  We're getting a glimpse of how their mother-son relationship works and doesn't work, and I'm sure we'll see more next week.

Sidenote:  I thought Faye was working at CoD and that's where she was when Hanners called her to come see baby pictures of Marten, but we didn't see her at CoD when Ms. Reed went there -- we only saw Penelope and Dora.  It's possible Faye was there but unseen, but I am now wondering where she is.  Hmm, maybe she left work early and is at the apartment making waffles . . .
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: AnAverageWriter on 07 Jan 2011, 13:17
I tend to think it's more that she's never really paid much attention to whether she's crossing Marten's boundaries.

From what I've seen, hardly anyone in this strip actually seems to respect Martin's boundaries. They cross all sorts of lines, all the while expecting Martin to behave like a Boy Scout, even while drunk. And Martin puts up with it!

This latest arc really has him channeling Charlie Brown. I half expect him to start saying "good grief" with every new betrayal.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Boomslang on 07 Jan 2011, 13:47
Since, by definition, nothing Marten does in the comic can be considered out of character, I'm having to re-examine how I look at Marten in light of what's happening.

And, really, I'm not liking what I'm seeing.

To really enjoy this comic, I have to have some sort of sympathy for the main characters, at least a little respect for who they are. Marten is being redefined in the current arc as someone I don't wish to spend time watching, in contrast with how he's been the rest of comic. I can understand that it might be for laughs, but... I don't find the punchlines funny. And even if it was, I don't think the debasement of Marten as a character would be worth it anyway. Hopefully things will change, but if next week is more of the same, I might stop reading.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 07 Jan 2011, 13:50
Hey, don't knock it. Chuck Schulz had that gig down for nearly 50 years. I think Jeph would be happy for half that.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: AnAverageWriter on 07 Jan 2011, 14:01
I liked "Peanuts" but...

If longevity were quality then the "Family Circus" would be considered the finest strip on the planet.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Armadillo on 07 Jan 2011, 14:15
God, this arc has become downright PAINFUL to read.  I can't directly empathize with Marten, because my Mom's nothing like Ms. Reed, but holy crap this woobie/chew toy thing the rest of the cast has with Marten has gone far enough.

By my count, he's gotten exactly one hug since this all went down, from Tai of all people, and even that ended with a nipple joke (which I found very funny, for what it's worth.)  Dora's gotten TWO hugs, one each from Marten's best friend who punched him out in a vulnerable state, and his MOM, who's been metaphorically stomping on his balls since she got there, almost with glee.

And now this.  He gets completely dressed down in front of his peers for daring to speak up in his own defense.  Par for the course, I suppose: Tai did call him a prick for a similar offense a few weeks back.  It's gone beyond simple laughs at the expense of a character; it's gotten to the point where I don't think anyone in this universe actually RESPECTS Marten.  When someone looks around and realizes that he's not respected and is for all intents and purposes a plaything, bad times are ahead.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Cie on 07 Jan 2011, 14:28
Meh, for all the 'VERONICA IS TEH EBULZS' and 'MARTEN IS A WHINY EMO DOORMAT', this situation is eerily simillar to a phase myself and a few of my friends are heading through.



My mother is a strong female - she's blunt, irrational and assuming at her very worst, but she's got a lot of good in her too. I'm a few months off being a legal adult, so I'm still living with my parents - I've 'outgrown' the nest for a good year or so now, so my mother and I am often stepping on each others toes.

My parents outweigh me far more in terms of life experience, but we're equals now in that we're all rational human beings and we can all pretty much reason for ourselves. The thing is, my mother particularly hasn't got out of the parent-child mindset yet, and she hasn't particularly got out of the mindset of hierarchy. In that, she can instruct me to do things which she would like me to do, but logically there's not much wrong with doing (we spent a month arguing over birth control because I wanted to have sex with my boyfriend for the first time, at the age of seventeen, in a very committed relationship, after serious consideration, research into different methods of birth control, and even an STI test on my boyfriend's end, but still deliberated for a while because she preferred me to abstain for a few years. I guess this probably appears biased, but it's the best example I have).

What she was particularly guilty of, is that if she had a problem with me, I was expected to apologise instantly. If I called her out though for being unfair at any point, she wouldn't discuss it with me, in response she'd just simply get enraged, or call me out as being silly. I recall ranting to her for five minutes about all the problems I had with her - yes, I did so immaturely, and I fully admit to being an ass about it, I was snappy with it. But she responded getting angry for two hours and breaking my lamp.




This sorta reminds me of Marten. He called her out earlier for trying to hook him up with the waitress, she brushed him off as petty and 'uptight'. Sure, a lot of her actions were good teasing fun, but they got excessive in number and she was being overbearing. The moment Marten snaps though, Veronica gets upset immediately simply because he was angry at her. I think that's a little hypocritical, and it reminds me a lot of my own experiences for that reason. Veronica in some ways still sees Marten as a kid, and doesn't really treat him with the respect an adult deserves.

But I think what's sort of alarming is how Marten automatically goes into apology mode. It's almost robotic. Marten's not a complete doormat - he's got enough balls to throw out a bitter comment in the first place to his own mother, and he's showed some of his nerve with what happened with Dora. But it's almost as if all his recent achievements in 'standing his ground' have sort of evaporated. It's almost unnatural.



I kinda wonder actually if Veronica and Marten have had problems in the past - especially with this development. It seems like at times she treats him a little like an accessory to tease for her own enjoyment, and whilst she knows it, she can forget that he's her own son. Similarly with the apologising -  wonder when Veronica disciplined, she took in any account of what Marten was like as a kid and a person? V's not a complete apathetic bitch to his feelings, and she's not amoral, but she can get carried away, and she can sometimes be a little short-sighted.

Marten's also not completely innocent either. Instead of confronting her over this about her feelings, openly, like an adult, the only way he can express his irritation is through expressions and snide comments. In a sort of 'hoping she'll get the hint' way - like an exasperated teenager. It's almost if Marten ran away from that confrontational stage at all, and never really could rebel properly - he's stuck as a teenager around her until he can get out of the mud. 

Wow. Mommy issues, much.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Murphoid on 07 Jan 2011, 14:29
Honestly, I can't make myself believe that someone working in a college library makes enough to live on.  He might get an allowance from his mom, but still this kind of thing from Mrs. Reed is bang out of order.

The average college trained librarian earns about $50000 a year, so I'm guessing Marten earns about half of that (That probably includes the 30% increase he got when he and Dora walked in on the committee members in the copy room). Assuming Marten and Faye split the rent 50/50, he can probably just about get by if he doesn't buy many extragences (If I remember correctly, the last major thing he bought was the guitar with the bet he made with Beatrice). I mean, we never see him having any problem paying rent or buying food, or at least to the degree where he has to go to his parents for a handout.

I think that 25K a year would be about right, If it is a full time job.  Marten does have a college degree but it is not in library science.  I see him more as just a page, shelving books and running the front desk.  He is not a manager and his previous work experience as Office Bitch hardly would qualify him to start making the big bucks, would it?

How would he get so lucky to get a full time job with a college with no library degree?  Meh.  Prolly just thinking too hard about it.

Although the bribes he is getting off the two professors he caught making the two backed monster might kick out some I guess.  About the only time I remember him talking about money at all was when he was trying to stop himself from impulse buying an IPOD which he ended up buying anyway.  Poor impulse control does lead to financial woes.

Anyway, it's a cartoon.  Having people discussing 401k's and paychecks would bot be very funny.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Pika_power on 07 Jan 2011, 14:49
I tend to think it's more that she's never really paid much attention to whether she's crossing Marten's boundaries.  She's not stupid, but she's not being deliberately malicious -- she just doesn't really understand why he has boundaries and hang-ups that she does not.
Unlike Dora, she recognises that he has boundaries. Dora isn't furtive about looking at his porn; she genuinely didn't see it as a problem. Ms. Reed acknowledges them as insecurities and problems, but she doesn't respect them. For example, the photos. She waits for him to sleep before doing it, and for the restaurant, she lies to his face before and after visiting. Those aren't the actions of someone who thinks Marten won't have a problem. They're the actions of someone who knows he has a problem with it, but does it anyway as soon as he's out of sight.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Blackjoker on 07 Jan 2011, 15:37
Somewhat jokingly, did Marten run over an entire caravan of gypsies before his mom showed up?

On a more serious note, I will admit, this is getting bloody painful to read. I'm not saying Marten needs to have a divine being ascend on a chariot and tell him he's awesome or smite those tormenting him, but for fucks sake this is just cruel. Marten's being dragged through the mud and if memory serves his mom was supposedly coming to HELP him. In this case she has humiliated him, lied to him, shown plenty of sympathy for Dora, and then the moment that Marten finally stands up to her she screams at him, humiliates him again, all while knowing that he's at a low point. I hate to say it but at least Hannelores mother was mostly just indifferent.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: pwhodges on 07 Jan 2011, 15:42
if memory serves his mom was supposedly coming to HELP him.

He did ask her not to - perhaps he already knew how it would go.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Blackjoker on 07 Jan 2011, 15:45
if memory serves his mom was supposedly coming to HELP him.

He did ask her not to - perhaps he already knew how it would go.

Oh, I know that she invited herself to come see him. But my point was more that she was allegedly coming to help him. What bothers me here is that at least when Hannelores mother tormented her Faye called her out on it, in this case it seems to be a case of 'enjoy Martens embarassment' with his friends.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: tomart on 07 Jan 2011, 16:01
Sure, a lot of her actions were good teasing fun, but they got excessive in number and she was being overbearing. The moment Marten snaps though, Veronica gets upset immediately simply because he was angry at her. I think that's a little hypocritical...
It seems like at times she treats him a little like an accessory to tease for her own enjoyment
Wow. Mommy issues, much.
Much!
Quote from: Blackjoker
this is getting bloody painful to read. I... for fucks sake this is just cruel. Marten's being dragged through the mud and ... his mom ... has humiliated him, lied to him, shown plenty of sympathy for Dora, and then the moment that Marten finally stands up to her she ... humiliates him again, all while knowing that he's at a low point.

Joseph Campbell delineates stages of the "hero"'s difficult journey through trials and tribulations, til painful self-awareness and his efforts overcome many adversities, and he emerges transformed.  I'm trying to imagine Jeph's plans for Marten. . .  I hope the worm turns soon.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Olymander on 07 Jan 2011, 16:38
Going with this one, since it's probably the easiest to use to try to get my thoughts across.

Buying tickets before considering his feelings on the matter, or whether or not he'd want her around after a breakup. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1810)

This is a fairly typical mothering reaction, especially if she still doesn't quite view him as a full adult, or perhaps feels that he "isn't equipped to cope with this on his own."  I don't think we've seen anything else similarly shattering happen to him yet, except possibly his getting fired (and he was thinking about quitting anyway, which softened that blow).  In any event, I'd write this off as a typical "mother" reaction.  Whether or not it's justified is, of course, a separate topic.

Clearly embarrassing him in front of a cute waitress, despite his protests, the day after he's had a breakup and probably doesn't want to consider anything new. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1821)

We don't really know how Marten responds to bad breakups (the only other one we know about for sure is Vicki, whom he followed to Massachusetts for, and we never saw how he really dealt with that).  Mrs. Reed, however, might, and if her experience is that Marten tends to descend into a funk, then this may be part of her way of trying to snap him out of it.  Of course, since they don't really interact regularly anymore, she may be off base as to how to get him to "move on", but it's hard to say.  She may actually be trying something that's worked previously on him.

Demonstrates either social unawareness, or has fun at Marten's expense, depending on how favourably you look at it. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1824)

Mrs. Reed may just have a problem of blurting out the first thing that comes to mind without completely thinking about it.  This will be repeated below (when talking to Sven).

Brings along baby pictures, which Marten has already expressed distaste for in the past. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1825) She waits for him to leave, because she knows he'd disapprove of her actions. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1827)

I'm not sure that Marten objects to the baby pictures per se, so much as the one specific one.  And I don't think that she pulled out the baby pictures just for that single one.  I think she's just proud of her boy, and wants to show off how "cute" he was when he was young to his friends.  In her mind, she thinks that this will help show them what a wonderful boy he is.  This is, again, what seems to be a fairly common parental attitude.

Touching raw nerves by openly flirting with Marten's ex's brother. Judging from his reaction here, going off to sleep is Marten's way of dealing with the stress from his mother. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1831)

Again, as stated above, possibly just a case of speaking without thinking.  Doesn't negate the damage done, of course, but it might explain why it comes out that way.

Again openly disregards his feelings and lies to him, so she can go off and comfort his ex. Completely inappropriate behaviour. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1831) When he finds out, she denies it, and then, instead of apologising, defends her actions. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1834)

All of this not including the most recent strip, which we agree is out of line.

In contrast, she managed to have a nice conversation with Dora. So she succeeds at comforting the person who put her son in the state he's in. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1833)

Something along the lines of that with Marten is what she should do. But that's not what people are complaining about. The problem is what she shouldn't do is exactly what she has done. Namely, everything I've just linked to.

The sad fact of the matter may be that she actually likes Dora too much.  In fact, she might be going to comfort Dora precisely because she remembers the threats she made last visit (although those were admittedly to Faye and not Dora) and she's going out of her way to let Dora know that there's no need to fear any retribution.  This may even be some sort of (possibly misguided) attempt to clear the way for a possible future reconciliation between Marten and Dora.  Now, sure, she lied about and denied her visit to Dora, but this may have been part of a continued attempt to keep the peace between everyone because she could easily see that her visiting Dora would upset Marten (for multiple reasons).  Even so, it's likely that she felt that "it was in the interest of the greater good" that she make the attempt (actual greater good is something we'll argue here, naturally).

From Marten's point of view, certainly, she shouldn't be doing what she's doing.  The question is, though, is Marten's point of view necessarily right?  The fact that Mrs. Reed may carelessly speak without thinking is not an excuse, certainly, but it is an explanation for what happened in those two cases, and it's not exactly an easy personal habit to correct.  The other things are also things that parents often do quite normally, which is, perhaps, part of the problem.  Even though we all know Marten's hurting, perhaps Mrs. Reed's response is to try to treat things "as normally as possible", to "get him back where he should be."  In this respect, her calling him on his snark makes sense from that point of view; it's not "normal" for him to be acting that way, and so she's trying to force him back into his "normal" self.  Now whether or not this is the best thing is, of course, a completely separate issue.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Boomslang on 07 Jan 2011, 17:04
Well, I suppose the reason everyone is jumping on her is that she wasn't acting like this the last time she was in town. Expectations for how much of a thoughtful, mature, and easygoing person were set up. And they're being demolished by this whole escapade.

It's hard to take the argument seriously that she's just being herself, and can't help it, because we've seen otherwise. Maybe it's just that the writing of the comic itself has changed in tone, or this is part of some harebrained scheme of V's to help Marten out, but it's different, and Marten really would benefit from having her previous incarnation show up again, even for just a strip or two.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 07 Jan 2011, 17:11
I missed a lot of good discussion while I was cut off from the Internet!

DSL's point about Dora's need for control struck me as insightful. One way to look at the breakup is that she was pulling a "you can't fire me, I quit" maneuver. After the underpants incident she asked if Marten was going to break up with her: the porn incident involved Marten actually criticizing her. She may not have experience of a boyfriend having constructive fights with her.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Armadillo on 07 Jan 2011, 17:18
Hell, if there had been even an INKLING shown that Veronica gives half a damn about Marten's feelings or boundaries, that'd be enough to placate most people.  As it is, if she comes out next week and tells Marten that it was all an attempt to get him out of his funk, then he'd no doubt think (justifiably so), "Jesus, there HAD to be a better way to go about it."

The last 2-3 weeks have been Nutshotapalooza for him, and by this point internally, he has to be BEGGING for someone to not take joy in his suffering.  A kind word, a hug, ANYTHING.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: cuzsis on 07 Jan 2011, 17:18
Nice Star Trek reference.

 Hee, hee. that's what I thought too!  :-D

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: pwhodges on 07 Jan 2011, 17:19
Well, I suppose the reason everyone is jumping on her is that she wasn't acting like this the last time she was in town.

Actually, last time she was in town, she also rode roughshod over his sensibilities by pulling a week-long sicky for him so that they could spend time together; but that time he wasn't in a bad place himself, so it didn't become an issue.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Somnus Eternus on 07 Jan 2011, 17:30
My dad's very much like Veronica, I think.  I'm 26, flown the nest and all (but I live near my parents so I still see them pretty often).  My dad frequently thinks he's helping by joking around and busting my chops and giving me a hard time even when I'm completely miserable and it's really just making me feel like absolute crap, but if I were to point out that it's demeaning and making me feel like absolute crap he declares I'm too sensitive and then gets mad at me for a week for objecting to this.  Of course, he doesn't accept apologies and therefore certainly wouldn't demand one, so that's where the comparison ends, I suppose. 

I kind of figured that this is fairly common behavior between somewhat-grown children and their parents; part of the whole adjusting to the changing roles thing.  I'm not saying it's normal, but I don't really think it's a horrible dynamic - certainly not one that'd be pegged as abusive.  Dysfunctional maybe.  But then, Marten isn't me and maybe this is how Marten needs to be handled to be brought out of a funk - the only one who'd really know is Marten's mom, and maybe we'll see some insight into that in upcoming strips.  After all, we haven't actually seen post-recent-breakup Marten before, and he really hasn't been through anything quite like this in-strip (I'm not counting when he lost his job because he hated it and he made it clear he hated it).  It might be her way of helping him cope.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: mary tyler murder on 07 Jan 2011, 18:24
Sure am enjoying Emotional Bullying, the webcomic.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Boomslang on 07 Jan 2011, 18:52
Actually, last time she was in town, she also rode roughshod over his sensibilities by pulling a week-long sicky for him so that they could spend time together; but that time he wasn't in a bad place himself, so it didn't become an issue.

Looking back at the comics, erm, no. He gave her his cellphone and work number, and was happy as heck when she managed to get him off of work.

Although there certainly were other instances where she was deliberately telling jokes to make Marten squirm, none of them were at the same level as the things she's done this time around. And the fact that she realizes that Dora might need some sympathy and comfort, but isn't giving Marten the same benefit, is pretty messed up. She's almost treating the situation like Dora is her daughter and Marten's the ex.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Armadillo on 07 Jan 2011, 19:11
And the fact that she realizes that Dora might need some sympathy and comfort, but isn't giving Marten the same benefit, is pretty messed up. She's almost treating the situation like Dora is her daughter and Marten's the ex.

Bingo.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: azurefirem on 07 Jan 2011, 19:37
I highly doubt I'm the first to ask this, but what is Marten's real middle name??????
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: themacnut on 07 Jan 2011, 19:46
I think why this past week of comics has been so tough for many of us is that many of us have either been in Marten's situation or have known someone similarly abused by their social circle. And it is nearly as unpleasant to watch as it is to go through, we wish the Chew Toy would stand up for themselves, or may wish WE had stood up for OURselves in that situation, and may still be unhappy at ourselves for not doing so.

And fundamentally, we care for Marten, fictional character or not. The only way to have found the past week of comics amusing, especially Friday's, would have been to turn off our empathy for Marten and just point and laugh.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 07 Jan 2011, 19:48
I agree. For those of you wishing Marten would sack up and stand up for himself to Veronica, ask yourself: Would you be able to yell at your mom?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Somnus Eternus on 07 Jan 2011, 19:49
Sure am enjoying Emotional Bullying, the webcomic.

Unrelated, but that is a fantastic username.

Related, I could have sworn another comic already claimed that name...
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: westrim on 07 Jan 2011, 20:00
I highly doubt I'm the first to ask this, but what is Marten's real middle name??????
Why do you assume he has one?

I agree. For those of you wishing Marten would sack up and stand up for himself to Veronica, ask yourself: Would you be able to yell at your mom?

Yes? It's not exactly uncommon...

Back on topic, I don't expect him to yell at her; he's not a yelling person. I do, however, hope that he'll say, "enough is enough! I'm tired of these goddamn embarrassments after my goddamn breakup!" Well, something along those lines. Or maybe just do his usual passive thing and walk away, maybe to Steve's. Hannelore can come along and moderate again.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Pika_power on 07 Jan 2011, 20:16
Buying tickets before considering his feelings on the matter, or whether or not he'd want her around after a breakup. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1810)
This is a fairly typical mothering reaction, especially if she still doesn't quite view him as a full adult, or perhaps feels that he "isn't equipped to cope with this on his own."  I don't think we've seen anything else similarly shattering happen to him yet, except possibly his getting fired (and he was thinking about quitting anyway, which softened that blow).  In any event, I'd write this off as a typical "mother" reaction.  Whether or not it's justified is, of course, a separate topic.
My entire point was that she was not viewing him as a full adult. She's acting as a mother, yes; a mother to a kid. She's supposed to be a mother to an adult, which is how we're expecting her to act.

Clearly embarrassing him in front of a cute waitress, despite his protests, the day after he's had a breakup and probably doesn't want to consider anything new. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1821)

We don't really know how Marten responds to bad breakups (the only other one we know about for sure is Vicki, whom he followed to Massachusetts for, and we never saw how he really dealt with that).  Mrs. Reed, however, might, and if her experience is that Marten tends to descend into a funk, then this may be part of her way of trying to snap him out of it.  Of course, since they don't really interact regularly anymore, she may be off base as to how to get him to "move on", but it's hard to say.  She may actually be trying something that's worked previously on him.
Evidence for such a theory must be provided. Without evidence, it's mere conjecture. It's possible that this is her way of snapping him out of it, and it may have worked before. However there nothing to suggest this is the case.

As evidence against it, Ms. Reed wished to help Dora, and helped her superbly, demonstrating that she has the ability to comfort people in an effective manner. We have seen little of that behaviour directed at Marten though.

As further reason for why the 'Ms. Reed works in mysterious ways' theory is invalid, look at Marten's reaction so far. It doesn't appear to be helping, and so far, Marten's reaction to Ms. Reed has been far from positive. That doesn't strike me as successful, and if Ms. Reed really were as devious as the theory suggests, she should be able to see that.

Demonstrates either social unawareness, or has fun at Marten's expense, depending on how favourably you look at it. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1824)

Mrs. Reed may just have a problem of blurting out the first thing that comes to mind without completely thinking about it.  This will be repeated below (when talking to Sven).
Any evidence to back up such a claim, perhaps from the first time she appeared?

Brings along baby pictures, which Marten has already expressed distaste for in the past. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1825) She waits for him to leave, because she knows he'd disapprove of her actions. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1827)

I'm not sure that Marten objects to the baby pictures per se, so much as the one specific one.  And I don't think that she pulled out the baby pictures just for that single one.  I think she's just proud of her boy, and wants to show off how "cute" he was when he was young to his friends.  In her mind, she thinks that this will help show them what a wonderful boy he is.  This is, again, what seems to be a fairly common parental attitude.
She waited until he left. This proves that she knew he would disapprove of her actions, yet she took them anyway. Even if Marten only objects to that one, she should have removed it, and confidently brought the album out in front of him, instead of furtively going behind his back. The mere fact that she waits for him to leave is proof that she knows he disapproves, and isn't just socially inept.

Touching raw nerves by openly flirting with Marten's ex's brother. Judging from his reaction here, going off to sleep is Marten's way of dealing with the stress from his mother. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1831)

Again, as stated above, possibly just a case of speaking without thinking.  Doesn't negate the damage done, of course, but it might explain why it comes out that way.
As a professional dominatrix, she should have better control of her tongue than to blurt stuff out without thinking. Also, no evidence for her blurting out without thinking has been provided.

Again openly disregards his feelings and lies to him, so she can go off and comfort his ex. Completely inappropriate behaviour. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1831) When he finds out, she denies it, and then, instead of apologising, defends her actions. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1834)

All of this not including the most recent strip, which we agree is out of line.

In contrast, she managed to have a nice conversation with Dora. So she succeeds at comforting the person who put her son in the state he's in. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1833)

Something along the lines of that with Marten is what she should do. But that's not what people are complaining about. The problem is what she shouldn't do is exactly what she has done. Namely, everything I've just linked to.

The sad fact of the matter may be that she actually likes Dora too much.  In fact, she might be going to comfort Dora precisely because she remembers the threats she made last visit (although those were admittedly to Faye and not Dora) and she's going out of her way to let Dora know that there's no need to fear any retribution.  This may even be some sort of (possibly misguided) attempt to clear the way for a possible future reconciliation between Marten and Dora.  Now, sure, she lied about and denied her visit to Dora, but this may have been part of a continued attempt to keep the peace between everyone because she could easily see that her visiting Dora would upset Marten (for multiple reasons).  Even so, it's likely that she felt that "it was in the interest of the greater good" that she make the attempt (actual greater good is something we'll argue here, naturally).
You mean there is a reason for her to sneak out in the middle of the dinner? I have nothing against her comforting Dora, but if her goal was to keep the peace, then she should have picked a significantly better moment. i.e. One when she wasn't hanging out with him.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Blackjoker on 07 Jan 2011, 20:24
I agree. For those of you wishing Marten would sack up and stand up for himself to Veronica, ask yourself: Would you be able to yell at your mom?

Yes, but then again I'm entirely sympathetic to Marten. My aim of irritation is more at his mother since her idea of helping is apparently rubbing salt in opened wounds.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: westrim on 07 Jan 2011, 20:31
Brings along baby pictures, which Marten has already expressed distaste for in the past. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1825) She waits for him to leave, because she knows he'd disapprove of her actions. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1827)
I'm not sure that Marten objects to the baby pictures per se, so much as the one specific one.  And I don't think that she pulled out the baby pictures just for that single one.  I think she's just proud of her boy, and wants to show off how "cute" he was when he was young to his friends.  In her mind, she thinks that this will help show them what a wonderful boy he is.  This is, again, what seems to be a fairly common parental attitude.
She waited until he left. This proves that she knew he would disapprove of her actions, yet she took them anyway. Even if Marten only objects to that one, she should have removed it, and confidently brought the album out in front of him, instead of furtively going behind his back. The mere fact that she waits for him to leave is proof that she knows he disapproves, and isn't just socially inept.
Your point has come up a couple times, and I kind of disagree. Bringing out the baby book behind his back in and of itself is not unusual - it seems to be a pretty universal mom thing to consider them adorable and worthy of showing off to anyone who wants a gander while their children consider it mortifying, something to be revealed only to a spouse. Mothers are aware of this but do not consider it an obstacle to their desire to show off their wittle boy.

The problem is that her timing is exquisitely bad; that this normal activity is absolutely not something she should be doing right now, when her son is going through a really tough time and needs her to stop indulging herself and support him. This goes for all her other activities, which might be hilarious at other times but are absolutely not right now.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: mary tyler murder on 07 Jan 2011, 20:32
Oh look, here is a crystal clear example of the sort of hyperbole I was talking about! Yay. The bar has been set.  :psyduck:

Pika_power: I think the problem there is that it's a very different animal, comforting your emotionally prickly, sullen son while allowing him his space as a fellow adult from telling his ex you're not going to hunt her down and that you think she's not a Huge Bitch BLUH BLUH. She's kind of trying to play it by ear, and Marten isn't making it easy for her.

As an adult, it's his responsibility to say things like "No, mom, I can't handle lunch yet," or "I need a hug, mom, I'm not okay", and while I continue to think the whole embarrassment parade is harmless fun myself, (especially the Sven thing! All she saw was a chance to reenact The Graduate, she didn't know that was Dora's bro) even if you don't think so you must note he has put up all the resistance of a wet paper bag with snarky horseshit written on it. While we know that Mom clearly has authority still,  and seems to wield it bluntly, it's not on her to know exactly what the boy is thinking or doing or wants.

I do think maybe Faye should've come to dinner. She might've kept things calmer all round, ironically.
 
Westrim: It's true, this is a hard time for Marten, but we aren't Marten! It's good to empathize, to a degree, but one must also recall that this is a silly slice of life comic that is generally pretty relentlessly lighthearted, and sometimes Marten will be trod on by Jeph for the sake of our laughter, and he'll bounce back from that like nothing even happened! Not every little thing in
QC is a piece of some greater whole, nor is every slight on our beleaguered boy a contribution to his mental breakdown.

Hodges: *bows* You are wiser and more patient than I, and I think that indulgence is necessary: as you say, our contributors are of many walks and stripes. I think, up until this last post, the dialogue (on the comic anyhow) was going rather well.

Pro victim blaming going on here in this post.

Edit: the flippant excuses for abhorrent behavior and minimizing of all harmful conduct except that of the actually hurt party are also pretty classic.

EDIT 2X: I guess given the preemptive personal attacks on anyone disagreeing with the views expressed, none of the rest of this should really be remarkable at all.

3X EDIT COMBO

Sure am enjoying Emotional Bullying, the webcomic.

Unrelated, but that is a fantastic username.

Related, I could have sworn another comic already claimed that name...

Related to unrelated, thanks I am pretty happy with it

Related to related, there was going to be but he went with Something Positive instead
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Blackjoker on 07 Jan 2011, 20:37
But I think what's sort of alarming is how Marten automatically goes into apology mode. It's almost robotic. Marten's not a complete doormat - he's got enough balls to throw out a bitter comment in the first place to his own mother, and he's showed some of his nerve with what happened with Dora. But it's almost as if all his recent achievements in 'standing his ground' have sort of evaporated. It's almost unnatural.

Well it's sort of like I mentioned in another thread, it almost seems like the universe itself punishes Marten whenever he's assertive and not a doormat. Conditioning can make a person behave certain ways, and each time Marten has tried to seize his destiny his destiny kicks him in the nuts and screams that it was assaulted.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Destenoth on 07 Jan 2011, 20:41
I'm not a big fan of Veronica at the moment, but I did just think of something. While the timing of her visit to Dora was dodgy, her covering it up can perhaps be explained by the fact that her threats to Faye never reached Marten's ears:

http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=459
http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=460

Thus, the "Veronica went to see Dora to reassure her and comfort her" angle may not have occured to him, especially seeing as she (jokingly) asked him if he wanted her dead. If she had told him explicitly "I went to see Dora to make sure she was okay" then that would have lead to "So why aren't you making sure I'm okay? All you've done is embarrass me!" or something along those lines (though perhaps he would have just thought it rather than said it). If he did find out about her threatening Faye, then he'd probably take it badly, seeing it as yet another example of "Mum thinks I can't look after myself".

So at the end of the day, telling him that she just went to see Dora ends badly no matter what she says. If she tells the truth she'll piss him off, and if she doesn't then he'll assume she went there to tear strips off her. However, this is by no means an excuse for her. The far better option would have been to visit Dora at another time, when there was no danger of Marten finding out. She has only herself to blame for Marten getting angry at her for seeing Dora.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: westrim on 07 Jan 2011, 20:43
Well it's sort of like I mentioned in another thread, it almost seems like the universe itself punishes Marten whenever he's assertive and not a doormat. Conditioning can make a person behave certain ways, and each time Marten has tried to seize his destiny his destiny kicks him in the nuts and screams that it was assaulted.
Marten: "I'm tired of hanging around this small town; I'm going to seize my destiny and go out to see the world and all the music it has to off-oof!" *groans, slides to ground in the Standard Male Pain Position (SMPP)*
Destiny: "Officer! Help officer! This... this animal was groping me!"
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: azurefirem on 07 Jan 2011, 20:43
... destiny kicks him in the nuts and screams that it was assaulted.
by a tentacle monster with spoon-fangs that shoots poison into the air five different ways.

idk, i'm not much of one for analyzation. it's never been my strong point, i detest it, and i still demand to know Marten's middle name.

I bet it's John or something like that
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Blackjoker on 07 Jan 2011, 20:52
Shulz was mentioned earlier, what I actually remember was an old peanuts cartoon where Lucy pulls the ball from Charlie Brown, in front of a whole stadium of people, which costs them the game and Peppermint Patty and everyone else yell at Charlie Brown for it. I think it was recieved so negatively they later redubbed it, but...well it feels oddly similar here. Just bringing that up as I reread the thread.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: themacnut on 07 Jan 2011, 21:07
Y'know, looking at the way Ms. Reed has been treating her son vs. how she treated Dora, one does have to wonder why she hasn't been nearly as kind to Marten as she was to Dora. There are a couple of explanations that spring to mind, based on this week of strips;

- she may think Marten won't respond well to the kind of comforting she offered Dora

- she REALLY liked Dora and blames Marten for the breakup, explanations of the circumstances be damned

Both of those explanations are too simplistic, though. I'm really not sure what she's doing here. Ms. Reed may not even be sure what she's doing, just that she feels like she has to do something. Unfortunately, it looks like Marten would have been better off if she'd stayed in CA. Too late for that now though...
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Armadillo on 07 Jan 2011, 21:43
Shulz was mentioned earlier, what I actually remember was an old peanuts cartoon where Lucy pulls the ball from Charlie Brown, in front of a whole stadium of people, which costs them the game and Peppermint Patty and everyone else yell at Charlie Brown for it. I think it was recieved so negatively they later redubbed it, but...well it feels oddly similar here. Just bringing that up as I reread the thread.

I don't remember that exact strip, but Charlie Brown is an excellent comparison to make here.  People (the comic readers) liked Charlie Brown because they saw a lot of themselves in him, namely the feelings of "weight of the world" and never really getting ahead with anyone or anything.  Both Charlie and Marten are that "everyman" character that so many of us can empathize with on some level, since most everybody feels utterly put upon by life at one point or another.

It's when that subtle "golly, he just can't catch a break, can he?  Poor fella" becomes "everybody here is unfairly piling on to his misery for no reason other than to remind him of his lowly place in life" that fans start to get queasy about a story's direction.  Hence the reaction to the Peanuts you referenced, and many of our (myself included) reactions to this current arc.  For the entirety of the breakup storyline, it's just felt that life in general and his social circle in particular has decided for whatever reason to collectively shit on our hero, and he hasn't deserved any of it.  I mean my God, he looks like a whipped puppy in the second and third panels today!  Fictional as he may be, I literally CRINGED when I saw that. 

Now might be a good time to mention that it's Jeph's storytelling ability that makes such an emotional response possible, of course.  I wouldn't want to give the impression that I'm LESS of a fan for this, after all. 
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Blackjoker on 07 Jan 2011, 21:54
Shulz was mentioned earlier, what I actually remember was an old peanuts cartoon where Lucy pulls the ball from Charlie Brown, in front of a whole stadium of people, which costs them the game and Peppermint Patty and everyone else yell at Charlie Brown for it. I think it was recieved so negatively they later redubbed it, but...well it feels oddly similar here. Just bringing that up as I reread the thread.

I don't remember that exact strip, but Charlie Brown is an excellent comparison to make here.  People (the comic readers) liked Charlie Brown because they saw a lot of themselves in him, namely the feelings of "weight of the world" and never really getting ahead with anyone or anything.  Both Charlie and Marten are that "everyman" character that so many of us can empathize with on some level, since most everybody feels utterly put upon by life at one point or another.
 ***
Now might be a good time to mention that it's Jeph's storytelling ability that makes such an emotional response possible, of course.  I wouldn't want to give the impression that I'm LESS of a fan for this, after all. 

It was actually one of the animated specials, It's your First Kiss Charlie Brown, I think was the one in question.

Oh, and I am still a fan of the comic as well, though not a fan of Martens mother.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 07 Jan 2011, 22:04
I agree. For those of you wishing Marten would sack up and stand up for himself to Veronica, ask yourself: Would you be able to yell at your mom?

Yes, but then again I'm entirely sympathetic to Marten. My aim of irritation is more at his mother since her idea of helping is apparently rubbing salt in opened wounds.

I'm sympathetic towards Marten too; my point is I didn't think children were programmed to find it easy call our parents on their bullshit (except when we were teenagers). I guess it just varies from person to person more than I thought. I find it hard to stand up to my mom sometimes despite the fact that our personalities are very similar.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: shlominus on 08 Jan 2011, 00:16
And the fact that she realizes that Dora might need some sympathy and comfort, but isn't giving Marten the same benefit, is seriously messed up.

fixed that for you.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 08 Jan 2011, 00:26
BLUH BLUH, VICTIM BLAMER

I'm honestly surprised that you felt I was making personal attacks, and mildly amused. I was not. Was I being dismissive and pointing out that I thought the post quoted was an excellent example of overwrought blubbering over the fate of Poor Poor Marten? Almost certainly! I'm sorry if that offends.

That being said, you have some pro self-righteousness and assumptions going on in your post, and I'm trying to gauge whether you mean them sincerely or are just trolling me. If you mean them sincerely, may I say that I think you are overinterpreting to the nth degree, and maybe need to calm down and recall what you're reading and that maybe you're projecting? If you are trolling, well, you win! The prize is my fleeting attention. Bask in it!

Okay we're done.

On to the more civil dialogues I was having.

Pika_power, I think you have a valid interpretation of events, and I am sure Marten would agree with your interpretation. Mayhap my problem is I'm trying not to view things exclusively through Marten's lens. There's a prevailing opinion on the forums, it seems, that Marten is in the right pretty continuously, and suffers like a martyr. I don't agree; Marty is very fallible, and all the sympathy grates after a while. I mean, for all the second-guessing Dora was doing through their entire relationship, ball of hidden psychological issues that she is, Marten was relatively happy, a few introspective sigh-filled nights aside. Recall that he's been doing very well by his own standards up until very very recently, and that he hasn't been Charlie Brown for more than a day or two in comic time.

I also think that Veronica would be shocked to hear that interpretation of events! I think (perhaps I stretch my good faith too much, but hey) that she is honestly trying to make Marten feel better and is perplexed as to why her attempts are not working, and that may be why she's lost her temper just now.

I also want to point out to all interested that I do think, having chewed the fat on it, that V's snap is indeed rather troubling, and not appropriate, and Marten's cringe is...well, it's troubling too. themacnut, you may be on to something there, and here's is a speculative thought: perhaps she really wants to feel for Marten, but she harbors simmering resentment for another Mr. Reed and the divorce? And try as she may, she ends up gravitating to the female in the relationship, because that was her in the past, whereas Marty is too much like his dad!

But this is wild speculation, and to engage it as truth is premature, silly, and Jeph's said he doesn't like it.

Besides which, I think it's far more likely that nobody knows what to do for Marten. And they try to help--they try! Hell, we were all expecting, in our hearts of hearts, that it would be like rje said: Veronica could fix this!! And we were so excited! But in the end, can she? Can anyone? Not really. And it's really disappointing!

Yet it's part of life.

As I said previously:

It's hard. Being a kid and growing up. It's hard and nobody understands.

I don't say that just because it's pithy and I am in love with Andrew Hussie's Homestuck, I say it because it's true. It is really hard to grow up and go through this shit and figure your life out, and nobody understands how to do it for you. It's hard, and I don't think Marten really realized how hard until right now. I think the real tragedy here is that Marten may be realizing that even his mom can't fix everything, and where does he go from here?

That being said, I also think it's important to step back, take a breath, and recall that QC is at its heart a lighthearted situational comedy where perpetual hipsters, nerds and a mad scientist's daughter share lives with porn-obsessed robots and Yelling Birds, and that if you view everything in it through the lens of Really Serious Drama, you are inviting nothing but constant heartbreak. Like life, QC should be enjoyed, and laughed at, not just the source of bitten lips and pursed brows.

Finally, iduguphergrave, I think you have a very good point: I know I could not go off on my mother like that, at least not with out feeling tremendous guilt and offering my apologies minutes later.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jedraft on 08 Jan 2011, 03:02
BLUH BLUH, VICTIM BLAMER

I'm honestly surprised that you felt I was making personal attacks, and mildly amused. I was not. Was I being dismissive and pointing out that I thought the post quoted was an excellent example of overwrought blubbering over the fate of Poor Poor Marten? Almost certainly! I'm sorry if that offends.

That being said, you have some pro self-righteousness and assumptions going on in your post, and I'm trying to gauge whether you mean them sincerely or are just trolling me. If you mean them sincerely, may I say that I think you are overinterpreting to the nth degree, and maybe need to calm down and recall what you're reading and that maybe you're projecting? If you are trolling, well, you win! The prize is my fleeting attention. Bask in it!

Okay we're done.

On to the more civil dialogues I was having.

Pika_power, I think you have a valid interpretation of events, and I am sure Marten would agree with your interpretation. Mayhap my problem is I'm trying not to view things exclusively through Marten's lens. There's a prevailing opinion on the forums, it seems, that Marten is in the right pretty continuously, and suffers like a martyr. I don't agree; Marty is very fallible, and all the sympathy grates after a while. I mean, for all the second-guessing Dora was doing through their entire relationship, ball of hidden psychological issues that she is, Marten was relatively happy, a few introspective sigh-filled nights aside. Recall that he's been doing very well by his own standards up until very very recently, and that he hasn't been Charlie Brown for more than a day or two in comic time.

I also think that Veronica would be shocked to hear that interpretation of events! I think (perhaps I stretch my good faith too much, but hey) that she is honestly trying to make Marten feel better and is perplexed as to why her attempts are not working, and that may be why she's lost her temper just now.

I also want to point out to all interested that I do think, having chewed the fat on it, that V's snap is indeed rather troubling, and not appropriate, and Marten's cringe is...well, it's troubling too. themacnut, you may be on to something there, and here's is a speculative thought: perhaps she really wants to feel for Marten, but she harbors simmering resentment for another Mr. Reed and the divorce? And try as she may, she ends up gravitating to the female in the relationship, because that was her in the past, whereas Marty is too much like his dad!

But this is wild speculation, and to engage it as truth is premature, silly, and Jeph's said he doesn't like it.

Besides which, I think it's far more likely that nobody knows what to do for Marten. And they try to help--they try! Hell, we were all expecting, in our hearts of hearts, that it would be like rje said: Veronica could fix this!! And we were so excited! But in the end, can she? Can anyone? Not really. And it's really disappointing!

Yet it's part of life.

As I said previously:

It's hard. Being a kid and growing up. It's hard and nobody understands.

I don't say that just because it's pithy and I am in love with Andrew Hussie's Homestuck, I say it because it's true. It is really hard to grow up and go through this shit and figure your life out, and nobody understands how to do it for you. It's hard, and I don't think Marten really realized how hard until right now. I think the real tragedy here is that Marten may be realizing that even his mom can't fix everything, and where does he go from here?

That being said, I also think it's important to step back, take a breath, and recall that QC is at its heart a lighthearted situational comedy where perpetual hipsters, nerds and a mad scientist's daughter share lives with porn-obsessed robots and Yelling Birds, and that if you view everything in it through the lens of Really Serious Drama, you are inviting nothing but constant heartbreak. Like life, QC should be enjoyed, and laughed at, not just the source of bitten lips and pursed brows.

Finally, iduguphergrave, I think you have a very good point: I know I could not go off on my mother like that, at least not with out feeling tremendous guilt and offering my apologies minutes later.


Good grief.

Sorry, but this may be a light-hearted comedy "overall," but there are important points throughout its quite long history when its subjects and situations stop being funny and the "light-hearted" turns either to touching moments of genuine friendship, tender moments of romance or -- this.  All the characters have grown, and in a realistic enough way that one becomes invested in the story.  The art in the strip, like the characters themselves, has become more and more realistic, and with that it draws the reader further into the world which, for all the science fiction of androids and anthroPCs, is still basically modeled very closely on the one we live in, and so one expects the characters to more or less act human, and not like Beetle Bailey and Sarge.   It's actually what separates it from "Amazing Super Powers," "Dinosaur Comics," "Dungeons and Denizens" or the fifty gajillion comics that mainly feature two assholes sitting on a couch with game controllers. So even if Jeph intends for this to be funny,given the years of work that he's put into drawing these characters with as many human dimensions as he has, a lot of his readers are just not gonna have that reaction.  It's really hard for anyone to see the simple light-hearted humor in the persistent emotional torture of a character that is well-drawn enough to identify with.     This is what this week has been, culminating in the ugly little episode today. 

And yeah, if this is a light-hearted comedy, then having Veronica hit by a bus would be every bit as funny as this was.  Funnier, in fact.  She can be in the hospital in traction, having male strippers come and grind against her body cast.  Or whatever.

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: themacnut on 08 Jan 2011, 03:03


Besides which, I think it's far more likely that nobody knows what to do for Marten. And they try to help--they try! Hell, we were all expecting, in our hearts of hearts, that it would be like rje said: Veronica could fix this!! And we were so excited! But in the end, can she? Can anyone? Not really. And it's really disappointing!

Yeah it is. I'm inclined to think a big part of it is that Ms. Reed truly doesn't know how to comfort Marten. A simple hug may be out of the question, at least in her mind, because Marten, like most boys, has most likely been refusing/protesting hugs from his mother since his preteen years. Attempting to "force" a hug on him could be taken just as badly as everything else she's tried. So what to do, indeed? Probably even Marten doesn't know, this appears to be only the second serious romantic relationship he's had that's crashed and burned, and he's hurting and doesn't know how to make it stop. Even alcohol has failed him as a comforter.

Finally, iduguphergrave, I think you have a very good point: I know I could not go off on my mother like that, at least not with out feeling tremendous guilt and offering my apologies minutes later.

Even if she's pissed you off as badly as Ms. Reed appears to be pissing off Marten? Not even so much as a "That's it. Go home Mom, you're not helping here. GO HOME!"
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: ChibiSoma on 08 Jan 2011, 03:07
Well, they say people go after significant others that remind them of their parents. I don't know who 'they' are, but they're fucking weird.

In this case, however, 'they' are correct. Because Veronica's as big a cunt as Dora! "Hey, let me come to visit and proceed to do countless things that piss you off even MORE!" Bitch.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Pika_power on 08 Jan 2011, 03:11
On to the more civil dialogues I was having.

Pika_power, I think you have a valid interpretation of events, and I am sure Marten would agree with your interpretation. Mayhap my problem is I'm trying not to view things exclusively through Marten's lens. There's a prevailing opinion on the forums, it seems, that Marten is in the right pretty continuously, and suffers like a martyr. I don't agree; Marty is very fallible, and all the sympathy grates after a while. I mean, for all the second-guessing Dora was doing through their entire relationship, ball of hidden psychological issues that she is, Marten was relatively happy, a few introspective sigh-filled nights aside. Recall that he's been doing very well by his own standards up until very very recently, and that he hasn't been Charlie Brown for more than a day or two in comic time.
For the most part, Marten is in the right. He's not perfect, and he doesn't always make the best decisions, but he usually makes good decisions. It's very difficult to blame him for events that unfold, and he's always playing the peacemaker, as even he's begun to notice. That's what makes his side attractive to the forum. Certainly, he completely screwed up when he got drunk, and for the past few in-comic days, he has been a dick, but he's usually in the right.

He's not always unhappy either. I acknowledge that point. He's only been the Butt Monkey for the past few in-comic days. That's exactly why the forum has been defending him so rabidly now. He had a good social circle, a supportive mother, a successful relationship and a healthy mental state. He lost the relationship and (arguably) the healthy mental state. People defended him over the relationship, because all throughout that relationship, he's been making an effort to keep it together. Now, for some strange reason, the social circle and mother have also departed, and no one understands why. The only one we understand is Marten, so naturally we take his side. We can theorise over what Ms. Reed is doing, but most theories have gaping holes. So we support Marten, again.

I also think that Veronica would be shocked to hear that interpretation of events! I think (perhaps I stretch my good faith too much, but hey) that she is honestly trying to make Marten feel better and is perplexed as to why her attempts are not working, and that may be why she's lost her temper just now.
Of course. I doubt she views herself as the villain. She's the kindly, supportive mother who flew out to comfort her son on short notice after his harsh breakup. We, as the audience, can see that she's either malicious or just plain stupid. All her actions are bringing Marten pain, and as a mother, she should pick up on that. Whatever way you look at it, you either have to be malicious towards your son, or an idiot to ditch him in the middle of dinner to comfort his ex. She may feel justified, but she's not considering Marten's feelings in the slightest. (Or if she is, she's malicious.)

It's hard. Being a kid and growing up. It's hard and nobody understands.

I don't say that just because it's pithy and I am in love with Andrew Hussie's Homestuck, I say it because it's true.
I honestly interpreted that as a sarcastic and insincere comment, as opposed to a true one. Growing up is easy, because all you have to do is survive and you grow, and of course everybody understands; they all went through it themselves. That quote strikes me more as a patronising adult talking down to a kid than anything else, although I haven't seen the original context, so I'm just going off the impression I get from reading it.

Finally, iduguphergrave, I think you have a very good point: I know I could not go off on my mother like that, at least not with out feeling tremendous guilt and offering my apologies minutes later.
I could, quite easily. But I'm an angsty teen filled with angsty teenage rage, so I get the feeling my opinion isn't valid here. :p

Even so, Marten doesn't strike me as the raging type. He's more likely to get on a bus and run away. That too is unlikely though. Marten doesn't flee or fight back; he takes the punches as they come.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: rje on 08 Jan 2011, 03:13
I agree. For those of you wishing Marten would sack up and stand up for himself to Veronica, ask yourself: Would you be able to yell at your mom?

If I wanted my mother to treat me like an adult, I would have to treat her like an adult -as- an adult, so yes, I would call her out on her behavior.
Not -yell-, because that's what Sullen Teenagers too. But be assertive and very forthright? Yes.

Regardless of what the Commandments state, parents aren't sacred cows. They make mistakes, and they screw up, and sometimes, they're kinda assholes. And I feel that to have a real healthy relationship with them, you have to recognize this fact and call them out on their bullshit when it pops up.

Imho Marten and Veronica are following old established patterns; times have changed. They need to forge some new ones.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Olymander on 08 Jan 2011, 03:28
My entire point was that she was not viewing him as a full adult. She's acting as a mother, yes; a mother to a kid. She's supposed to be a mother to an adult, which is how we're expecting her to act.

Maybe it's just the mothers that I know, but this sort of thing really isn't all that uncommon, so I don't find that her acting that way is out of the ordinary (my friends are all mostly in their late 20s to early 30s, by the way... some of them with children of their own!).  Some mothers just never quite get past that "mothering instinct", and more often than not, times of trouble like this bring that out even more.

We don't really know how Marten responds to bad breakups (the only other one we know about for sure is Vicki, whom he followed to Massachusetts for, and we never saw how he really dealt with that).  Mrs. Reed, however, might, and if her experience is that Marten tends to descend into a funk, then this may be part of her way of trying to snap him out of it.  Of course, since they don't really interact regularly anymore, she may be off base as to how to get him to "move on", but it's hard to say.  She may actually be trying something that's worked previously on him.
Evidence for such a theory must be provided. Without evidence, it's mere conjecture. It's possible that this is her way of snapping him out of it, and it may have worked before. However there nothing to suggest this is the case.

As evidence against it, Ms. Reed wished to help Dora, and helped her superbly, demonstrating that she has the ability to comfort people in an effective manner. We have seen little of that behaviour directed at Marten though.

As further reason for why the 'Ms. Reed works in mysterious ways' theory is invalid, look at Marten's reaction so far. It doesn't appear to be helping, and so far, Marten's reaction to Ms. Reed has been far from positive. That doesn't strike me as successful, and if Ms. Reed really were as devious as the theory suggests, she should be able to see that.

As stated, the problem is that we don't know how Marten responds, so your conjecture that sympathy directed at Marten would work better than the current approach is just as much mere conjecture as mine.  Certainly, her current approach does not seem to be working at present, but that does not mean that showing him sympathy and just being there for him would work better.  Hannelore at least partially tried that approach, and there did not seem to be much improvement (admittedly, it was only for a short time).  My point is really that we have no evidence... for either side.

She comforts Dora in the "conventional" way because she doesn't know what would work for her, and thus uses that method, but perhaps she knows that doesn't work on her son, and thus is going for the "tough love" approach.  This brings up a possibly interesting point, however.  How similar is Marten to his father, and how much of Mrs. Reed's reaction may be some subconscious reaction to things that would work on him?  After all, there is that story about him in #441 (linked below).

Edit - I totally typed this up before I read Dr. ROFLPWN's post. No, really!  :-D

As well, again it may just be my circles, but I've often seen that parents can be much harder towards family than towards "strangers".  They'll bend over backwards for people that are "merely" friends or acquaintances, but family just has to "suck it up".  It probably has something to do with how they feel that others, outside the family should perceive them, but family, being, well, family doesn't "deserve" the nice impressions.  This may be more of a foreign as opposed to American thing, though.

Expansion - While it's completely understandable that people empathize with Marten and would like the current constant stream of abuse to stop and see him get the coddling that many feel he wants and "deserves", it is not clear that this would be what would be "best" for him.  After all, this may all be intended as a "growth through adversity" plan of Jeph's that will end up giving us a stronger, better, more mature Marten in the future.  That, however, is pure speculation on many, many, levels.

Mrs. Reed may just have a problem of blurting out the first thing that comes to mind without completely thinking about it.  This will be repeated below (when talking to Sven).
Any evidence to back up such a claim, perhaps from the first time she appeared?
Touching raw nerves by openly flirting with Marten's ex's brother. Judging from his reaction here, going off to sleep is Marten's way of dealing with the stress from his mother. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1831)

Again, as stated above, possibly just a case of speaking without thinking.  Doesn't negate the damage done, of course, but it might explain why it comes out that way.
As a professional dominatrix, she should have better control of her tongue than to blurt stuff out without thinking. Also, no evidence for her blurting out without thinking has been provided.

#433 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=433) - Her first time talking to Faye is remarkably like her first time talking to Hannelore, allowing for the fact that Hannelore has more obvious issues than Faye.  Remember that this was before "The Talk", so all we really knew that was "wrong" about Faye was her habit of using Marten as a punching bag.  Also consider how she casually mentions how Marten doesn't like to talk about the divorce not only because of the divorce, but because his father had just come out of the closet.  To me, this wouldn't be the sort of thing you casually mention to someone you've only just met.  Marten passes it off as not being much of a surprise.

#434 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=434) - Second to last and last panels; Mrs. Reed is setup as dating guys half her age (Hi, Sven!), and providing information that embarasses Marty.  Even Faye mentions that it's a cold reaction.  Seems like even more setup for what we have going on now.  Of course, at the time, Marten was in a better place (emotionally), so it all pretty much just got passed off as "oh, that darn mother of mine".

#435 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=435) - Last panel again, merrily carrying on about her own thing and embarassing Marten further.

#441 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=441) - Ribald story about herself and Marten's father, which she alternately claims is true, then not, then is.  I think this one might actually be worse than her showing off his baby pictures.  On that note, perhaps this is related to your professional dominatrix thing; since she's with her son, she feels she can "relax" and be off the job, which loosens her tongue a bit more than might be considered proper.

#460 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=460) - Last panel, again with the TMI for Marten, as well as the added punch of Faye's comment.

#1822 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1822) - This visit, but see how she blurts out the same statement as Dora did upon meeting Tai.  Now, when this was last discussed, it was more about how it was the same statement as Dora's, but it's still another example of her blurting things out without necessarily thinking about it.

I'm not sure that Marten objects to the baby pictures per se, so much as the one specific one.  And I don't think that she pulled out the baby pictures just for that single one.  I think she's just proud of her boy, and wants to show off how "cute" he was when he was young to his friends.  In her mind, she thinks that this will help show them what a wonderful boy he is.  This is, again, what seems to be a fairly common parental attitude.
She waited until he left. This proves that she knew he would disapprove of her actions, yet she took them anyway. Even if Marten only objects to that one, she should have removed it, and confidently brought the album out in front of him, instead of furtively going behind his back. The mere fact that she waits for him to leave is proof that she knows he disapproves, and isn't just socially inept.

As someone else has mentioned, this is still a common parental phenomenon.  It's a case of where parental pride in what they've created outweighs (for them) any possible embarassment inflicted on their offspring.  In fact, often in their view, it's more of a "look how cute my little snookum wookums is/was," and in their minds it should only enhance said offspring's standing amongst their friends.  Said offspring, of course, naturally often have different ideas.  It's just part of the dichotomy between parental and children's views.

You mean there is a reason for her to sneak out in the middle of the dinner? I have nothing against her comforting Dora, but if her goal was to keep the peace, then she should have picked a significantly better moment. i.e. One when she wasn't hanging out with him.

This may have been the only time she thought she could find Dora.  After all, she doesn't know where Sven lives, and it's not exactly a question she could ask Marten.  For that matter, she may not even know that Dora is currently living with Sven.  The point being that as far as we know that Mrs. Reed knows, the only place she would be able to find Dora would be at CoD, and she just took the first opportunity she had to go there, even though it ended up being during a time when she was with Marten.

And for the record, I do not necessarily agree with what Mrs. Reed has been doing.  I do feel that I should point out how things might seem from her end, and that we can then all draw our own conclusions, as people generally do.  The point being that while what Mrs. Reed is doing may be "wrong", she's not doing them arbitrarily, but is doing them for reasons that, to her, seem valid.

Of course. I doubt she views herself as the villain. She's the kindly, supportive mother who flew out to comfort her son on short notice after his harsh breakup. We, as the audience, can see that she's either malicious or just plain stupid. All her actions are bringing Marten pain, and as a mother, she should pick up on that. Whatever way you look at it, you either have to be malicious towards your son, or an idiot to ditch him in the middle of dinner to comfort his ex. She may feel justified, but she's not considering Marten's feelings in the slightest. (Or if she is, she's malicious.)


I don't agree that we can see "that she's either malicious or just plain stupid."  She doesn't see things the same as he does, and she may be wrong, but this doesn't necessarily make her malicious or stupid.  If she had been truly malicious, she would have told him flat out, "Now that we're here, I'm going to pop over and comfort Dora, because you don't deserve it, you whiny little bitch."  Instead, she tried to spare his feelings by trying to cover up what she was doing.  Now, I don't disagree that it might not have been the best time for her to do it, but, as stated above, she may have thought that she wouldn't get any better chance to do so, and perhaps she did it in order to hopefully gain some more insight into the situation so she could maybe adjust her tactics.  If this was the case, it did apparently fail, although we don't know if she and Dora talked anymore after the strip we saw.  Still, just because 2 people disagree on things, or do things differently, does not make one or the other "malicious or stupid."  There is a lot of room in this world for genuine disagreement on how things ought to be handled, and there is usually no one right answer.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Pika_power on 08 Jan 2011, 04:22
Maybe it's just the mothers that I know, but this sort of thing really isn't all that uncommon, so I don't find that her acting that way is out of the ordinary (my friends are all mostly in their late 20s to early 30s, by the way... some of them with children of their own!).  Some mothers just never quite get past that "mothering instinct", and more often than not, times of trouble like this bring that out even more.
Yep. My original post was in response to someone saying she was treating him like an adult. Regardless of how common that is, she's still babying him.


As stated, the problem is that we don't know how Marten responds, so your conjecture that sympathy directed at Marten would work better than the current approach is just as much mere conjecture as mine.  Certainly, her current approach does not seem to be working at present, but that does not mean that showing him sympathy and just being there for him would work better.  Hannelore at least partially tried that approach, and there did not seem to be much improvement (admittedly, it was only for a short time).  My point is really that we have no evidence... for either side.
We can see that the current approach isn't working, which demonstrates the point 'Marten does not respond well to tough love.' So tough love is known to be a failure, while conventional methods are just plain unknown. So why is Ms. Reed using a method that clearly doesn't work, as opposed to something else?

She comforts Dora in the "conventional" way because she doesn't know what would work for her, and thus uses that method, but perhaps she knows that doesn't work on her son, and thus is going for the "tough love" approach.  This brings up a possibly interesting point, however.  How similar is Marten to his father, and how much of Mrs. Reed's reaction may be some subconscious reaction to things that would work on him?  After all, there is that story about him in #441 (linked below).
However there is ample evidence that tough love does not work on her son either, and no evidence that conventional love doesn't.


#433 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=433) - Her first time talking to Faye is remarkably like her first time talking to Hannelore, allowing for the fact that Hannelore has more obvious issues than Faye.  Remember that this was before "The Talk", so all we really knew that was "wrong" about Faye was her habit of using Marten as a punching bag.  Also consider how she casually mentions how Marten doesn't like to talk about the divorce not only because of the divorce, but because his father had just come out of the closet.  To me, this wouldn't be the sort of thing you casually mention to someone you've only just met.  Marten passes it off as not being much of a surprise.

#434 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=434) - Second to last and last panels; Mrs. Reed is setup as dating guys half her age (Hi, Sven!), and providing information that embarasses Marty.  Even Faye mentions that it's a cold reaction.  Seems like even more setup for what we have going on now.  Of course, at the time, Marten was in a better place (emotionally), so it all pretty much just got passed off as "oh, that darn mother of mine".

#435 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=435) - Last panel again, merrily carrying on about her own thing and embarassing Marten further.

#441 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=441) - Ribald story about herself and Marten's father, which she alternately claims is true, then not, then is.  I think this one might actually be worse than her showing off his baby pictures.  On that note, perhaps this is related to your professional dominatrix thing; since she's with her son, she feels she can "relax" and be off the job, which loosens her tongue a bit more than might be considered proper.

#460 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=460) - Last panel, again with the TMI for Marten, as well as the added punch of Faye's comment.

#1822 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1822) - This visit, but see how she blurts out the same statement as Dora did upon meeting Tai.  Now, when this was last discussed, it was more about how it was the same statement as Dora's, but it's still another example of her blurting things out without necessarily thinking about it.
Thanks. Now it's a solid theory. Ms. Reed does have a tendency to blurt stuff out, however back then Marten wasn't coming out of a breakup, so it was just wacky hijinks, as opposed to drama.

Although most of that was in front of Marten, implying she didn't think he'd have a problem with it. With the baby photos, she purposefully waiting until after he'd left.

As someone else has mentioned, this is still a common parental phenomenon.  It's a case of where parental pride in what they've created outweighs (for them) any possible embarassment inflicted on their offspring.  In fact, often in their view, it's more of a "look how cute my little snookum wookums is/was," and in their minds it should only enhance said offspring's standing amongst their friends.  Said offspring, of course, naturally often have different ideas.  It's just part of the dichotomy between parental and children's views.
My initial post was providing evidence that Ms. Reed still treated him as a kid, as opposed to an adult. Whether or not it's common, disregarding your son's opinion to show images behind his back is not treating them in a manner fitting to that of an adult.

This may have been the only time she thought she could find Dora.  After all, she doesn't know where Sven lives, and it's not exactly a question she could ask Marten.  For that matter, she may not even know that Dora is currently living with Sven.  The point being that as far as we know that Mrs. Reed knows, the only place she would be able to find Dora would be at CoD, and she just took the first opportunity she had to go there, even though it ended up being during a time when she was with Marten.
Isn't Coffee of Doom open tomorrow? What was so urgent about it that she had to walk out on Marten to see her?

And for the record, I do not necessarily agree with what Mrs. Reed has been doing.  I do feel that I should point out how things might seem from her end, and that we can then all draw our own conclusions, as people generally do.  The point being that while what Mrs. Reed is doing may be "wrong", she's not doing them arbitrarily, but is doing them for reasons that, to her, seem valid.
Fair enough. It seems I've taken a stance against Ms. Reed's honourable name, so it's conducive to discussion if others take a stance protecting it. That way, weak arguments either get weeded out or improved. (Or if the discussion goes badly, turn into a flame war.)

I don't agree that we can see "that she's either malicious or just plain stupid."  She doesn't see things the same as he does, and she may be wrong, but this doesn't necessarily make her malicious or stupid.  If she had been truly malicious, she would have told him flat out, "Now that we're here, I'm going to pop over and comfort Dora, because you don't deserve it, you whiny little bitch."  Instead, she tried to spare his feelings by trying to cover up what she was doing.  Now, I don't disagree that it might not have been the best time for her to do it, but, as stated above, she may have thought that she wouldn't get any better chance to do so, and perhaps she did it in order to hopefully gain some more insight into the situation so she could maybe adjust her tactics.  If this was the case, it did apparently fail, although we don't know if she and Dora talked anymore after the strip we saw.  Still, just because 2 people disagree on things, or do things differently, does not make one or the other "malicious or stupid."  There is a lot of room in this world for genuine disagreement on how things ought to be handled, and there is usually no one right answer.
Yes, perhaps 'malicious' was a bad choice of words. May I instead replace it with, "blatantly disregarding Marten's wishes"?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Mustakyy on 08 Jan 2011, 05:03

All her actions are bringing Marten pain, and as a mother, she should pick up on that. Whatever way you look at it, you either have to be malicious towards your son, or an idiot to ditch him in the middle of dinner to comfort his ex. She may feel justified, but she's not considering Marten's feelings in the slightest. (Or if she is, she's malicious.)


Little bit of hyperbole there? Despite the UGLY turn which events took after leaving the restaurant, I still think that sole reason of Ms. Reed coming to town is to be there for her son. The methods she's using may not be the best, and even the results aren't quite what she's expecting. But malicious? To her OWN SON? To whom she took time to fly over from CA to visit (albeit against Martens will, I admit). Kind of farfetched accusation, methinks.



I'm inclined to think a big part of it is that Ms. Reed truly doesn't know how to comfort Marten. A simple hug may be out of the question, at least in her mind, because Marten, like most boys, has most likely been refusing/protesting hugs from his mother since his preteen years. Attempting to "force" a hug on him could be taken just as badly as everything else she's tried. So what to do, indeed? Probably even Marten doesn't know, this appears to be only the second serious romantic relationship he's had that's crashed and burned, and he's hurting and doesn't know how to make it stop. Even alcohol has failed him as a comforter.


I think you got into root of the problem there. What if she just doesn't know how to be there for him? That would explain some of her quite rash actions. She wants to be there for her son, but doesn't quite know how, and Marten isn't in a very talkative mood (which is TOTALLY understandable in his current situation), which isn't helping the situation for either. And NO, im not saying that she's a saint and there's nothing wrong with her actions, and Marten should "snap out of it". Hell no. Just pointing out my opinion that even while Marten has had quite a rough times lately, not ALL of the embarassing events are planned to crush his spirit for good.

As for visiting Dora at CoD, i too think that she might have thought that while the timing wasn't exactly perfect, that might have been the only chance to her to see Dora and maybe get also her side of the story (we might never know what was the whole conversation, and Marten's reaction at dinnertable gives a hint that it might have taken a bit longer time than just the condolences-discussion).

And for accusation of "emotional torture"? SERIOUSLY???? Yes, I totally feel sorry for Marten, and can understand the pain he's feeling. Yes, things haven't been peachy for him. Mom bringing embarrassing babypictures (as said many times before, that ISN'T that rare thing for PARENTS to have) and embarrasing him at the lunch (the waiter-gate incident), his boss having awkward fangirlish-moment and couple other embarrassing/awkward moments. The ONLY thing i count even REMOTELY CLOSE to emotional torture was the unfairly forced apology, when leaving the restaurant.

What will near future bring to us? I trust that Jeph has somekind of suprising turn in store for us which will drop most of us (yea, including myself) from our high horses. (im just hoping that would include a bit moar positivity)


tl;dr version     -  things aint that much of black and white
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Pika_power on 08 Jan 2011, 05:22

All her actions are bringing Marten pain, and as a mother, she should pick up on that. Whatever way you look at it, you either have to be malicious towards your son, or an idiot to ditch him in the middle of dinner to comfort his ex. She may feel justified, but she's not considering Marten's feelings in the slightest. (Or if she is, she's malicious.)


Little bit of hyperbole there? Despite the UGLY turn which events took after leaving the restaurant, I still think that sole reason of Ms. Reed coming to town is to be there for her son. The methods she's using may not be the best, and even the results aren't quite what she's expecting. But malicious? To her OWN SON? To whom she took time to fly over from CA to visit (albeit against Martens will, I admit). Kind of farfetched accusation, methinks.

Agreed, as noted in my reply above, malicious was a poor choice on my part. "Blatantly disregarding Marten's wishes" is closer to the point I was trying to make.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 08 Jan 2011, 05:36
I agree. For those of you wishing Marten would sack up and stand up for himself to Veronica, ask yourself: Would you be able to yell at your mom?

Real mom: Kind of hard, since she's six feet under.

Stepmom - Frequently, before she went six feet under.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: StevenC on 08 Jan 2011, 05:44
Next week: it was all just a dream, induced by blunt head trauma from Faye's version of "though love".
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 08 Jan 2011, 05:48
What's going to happen before Veronica leaves town?

Reconciliation - between the sheets.    - 4 (3.5%)
Platonic Reconciliation.    - 11 (9.6%)
Hilarious Misunderstanding.    - 15 (13.2%)
MARTEN RAAAAAAGGGGGEEEE!    - 23 (20.2%)
DORA RAAAAAAGGGGGEEEE!    - 0 (0%)
FAYE RAAAAAAGGGGGEEEE!    - 2 (1.8%)
Hannelore Hulks out!    - 6 (5.3%)
Sven Seduction!    - 9 (7.9%)
Cosette Burns down COD, everyone dies.    - 16 (14%)
Pintsize!    - 7 (6.1%)
Waffles!    - 21 (18.4%)

Total Voters: 114
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 08 Jan 2011, 05:53
Not even gonna try to quote it will be a nightmare. OK GO

Jedraft: I am fully briefed on the fact that QC is in fact more real than Kraft Mayo. I also think that despite being realer than real, to call what Marten has been experiencing the past week of strips "emotional abuse/torture" at best is incredibly silly and demonstrates profound ignorance of such a subject and is at worst irresponsible and misrepresentative. That being said, again, who am I but a guy on the Internet, you can be overwrought if you like.

Pika: Distegarding perhaps? She seems more "ignorant", to me; she's definitely back in established mother-child patterns. I think she isn't a stupid person, but she's reading Marty wrong and he's not helping. Again, her whip-crack discipline is out of line on an adult, yes, but I think she has been being a bumbling confused parent with communication issues and clouded emotions, not an actively malicious force.

To wax a little more philosophical, I'm surprised you find the quote patronizing; it's easy to conceive of "just surviving", and equally easy to believe that others' experience will help, but...hell, look at Marten right now. I'm sure V isn't a stranger to hard breakups or emotional pain, but for all her experience in moving forward, she's no help! His friends are likewise unhelpful. He's essentially alone and the thing giving him direction is totally gone. Given resources he can survive, sure, but...it's hard. And nobody else understands.

Olymander: I like the cut of your jib, sirrah, and I do believe I approve of your posts (bask in the approval!)

ChibiSoma: ... please stop? Please. Yes, we understand that Dora is a bitch. It has been repeated so often that it has no value and it had little to start with. We also understand that you don't like the rest of the female cast much either. I am trying to think of a post of yours in here that does not involve you calling a female character a derogatory term or implying that one is guilty of some great crime. I can't think of one. Please don't keep just doing that, because it is repetitive and pointless and not good dialogue.

Okay, that's off my chest! I feel better now. To TACO BELL!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 08 Jan 2011, 06:05
I agree. For those of you wishing Marten would sack up and stand up for himself to Veronica, ask yourself: Would you be able to yell at your mom?

Real mom: Kind of hard, since she's six feet under.

This might make me sound like an arsehole, but I've actually used the alternate response of "I dunno, you got a ouiji board?" to when someone poses that question (usually if I'm pissed off and the person asking actually knows me).

Seriously, mothers are the easiest people to get angry at, because most of the time, we know they love us unconditionally. And they are also the undisputed mistresses of guilt-tripping us.

Back to the anger. There are often just two people in the world who can ever say they've known us for our entire lives, our parents. They know the fears, the dreams, when we're sick, when we're faking it to get out of doing something. They know what makes us tick and what can get us down. They also have a tendency to hit every switch that pisses us off. If you imagine someone like a swiss clock that is need of delicate, gentle repair, a parent is often the first one in to try and fix it. But instead of slowly removing the broken pieces, they've brought a sledgehammer in to get to the root of the problem. We're expect our parents to be able to fix any problem, but as we get older, we find that they have had completely different life experiences to us, and often they don't know what to do, and that is what angers us. We want a solution and they can't help.

As for the guilt-tripping, read the whole of the last paragraph, its valid.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Blackjoker on 08 Jan 2011, 07:33
What's going to happen before Veronica leaves town?

Reconciliation - between the sheets.    - 4 (3.5%)
Platonic Reconciliation.    - 11 (9.6%)
Hilarious Misunderstanding.    - 15 (13.2%)
MARTEN RAAAAAAGGGGGEEEE!    - 23 (20.2%)
DORA RAAAAAAGGGGGEEEE!    - 0 (0%)
FAYE RAAAAAAGGGGGEEEE!    - 2 (1.8%)
Hannelore Hulks out!    - 6 (5.3%)
Sven Seduction!    - 9 (7.9%)
Cosette Burns down COD, everyone dies.    - 16 (14%)
Pintsize!    - 7 (6.1%)
Waffles!    - 21 (18.4%)

Total Voters: 114


I like that waffles is a close second, and would like to find a way to combine waffles and Marten RAAAGE
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Mustakyy on 08 Jan 2011, 09:33

I like that waffles is a close second, and would like to find a way to combine waffles and Marten RAAAGE


"No moar waffles???" "Noooooo!!!"
*last straw for our unlucky protagonist*

"FFFFUUUUU!"

 :-D


Agreed, as noted in my reply above, malicious was a poor choice on my part. "Blatantly disregarding Marten's wishes" is closer to the point I was trying to make.


Whoops, didnt notice that in time. Sry, wasnt trying to nitpick, the choice of words just sounded a bit too harsh for my ears.

Ok, im off to see Tron legacy, sorry for the silly antics  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: AnAverageWriter on 08 Jan 2011, 10:36
And yeah, if this is a light-hearted comedy, then having Veronica hit by a bus would be every bit as funny as this was.  Funnier, in fact. 

Or have Veronica and Dora both get hit by a bus and never show up in the comic again. That would be funny!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 08 Jan 2011, 10:48
Hell, I wouldn't put it past her to do something like looking up porn on his computer, even if he specifically asked her not to. Take from that what you will.


Many of us end up dating folks who behave like our parents.   In my case,  I dated quite a few women who behaved like my mother did twords me before I figured it out.

This may be what Jeph is demonstrating with this arc.     Dora and Mother Of Martin (M.O.M.) are more alike than we (didn't before) realize... she is demonstrating the same Lack Of Respect/Hey It's Your Fault For Having A Spine behavior that Dora did.

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Pika_power on 08 Jan 2011, 11:03
Pika: Distegarding perhaps? She seems more "ignorant", to me; she's definitely back in established mother-child patterns. I think she isn't a stupid person, but she's reading Marty wrong and he's not helping. Again, her whip-crack discipline is out of line on an adult, yes, but I think she has been being a bumbling confused parent with communication issues and clouded emotions, not an actively malicious force.

Yes. For the third time since I initially posted it, I take it back. Marten's mother is not malicious. A far better turn of phrase is "Blatantly disregarding Marten's wishes".
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Swedish Chef on 08 Jan 2011, 12:10

Seriously, mothers are the easiest people to get angry at, because most of the time, we know they love us unconditionally. And they are also the undisputed mistresses of guilt-tripping us.


True that. Now, add 
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: MillionDollar Belt Sander on 08 Jan 2011, 12:14


"No moar waffles???" "Noooooo!!!"
*last straw for our unlucky protagonist*

"FFFFUUUUU!"

\

Monday's strip (in this bizzaro-world unlikely-to-happen universe) would be them leading a battered, hand-cuffed Martin to the police-car,   Pintsize pieces strewn about the room (damaged poster askew on the wall) and Faye giving a statement to the police.   "And then he snapped... so I kicked his ass for his own good."


Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Dr. ROFLPWN on 08 Jan 2011, 15:48
Pika: Distegarding perhaps? She seems more "ignorant", to me; she's definitely back in established mother-child patterns. I think she isn't a stupid person, but she's reading Marty wrong and he's not helping. Again, her whip-crack discipline is out of line on an adult, yes, but I think she has been being a bumbling confused parent with communication issues and clouded emotions, not an actively malicious force.

Yes. For the third time since I initially posted it, I take it back. Marten's mother is not malicious. A far better turn of phrase is "Blatantly disregarding Marten's wishes".

Bluhhh. I meant that as "you could also use 'ignorant' or 'bumbling'", not to try and correct you again. Sorry!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: leahneedsanap on 08 Jan 2011, 16:33
Man, no wonder Marten was happy to take a stupid risk to move across the country for a girl--an excuse to break the tether if nothing else.

Also, you know who Dora needs to have a talk with?  Meera.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: themacnut on 08 Jan 2011, 16:33


"No moar waffles???" "Noooooo!!!"
*last straw for our unlucky protagonist*

"FFFFUUUUU!"

\

Monday's strip (in this bizzaro-world unlikely-to-happen universe) would be them leading a battered, hand-cuffed Martin to the police-car,   Pintsize pieces strewn about the room ...

Actually, I can see Marten snapping on Pintsize after one prank too many, which would most likely be right after the debacle that was his day with his mother. He won't go off on his mother, no way. But Pintsize? I think if our favorite mischevious little AnthroPC doesn't watch his step over the next few days, he could find himself ending up in more pieces than even Marigold could put back together-courtesy of Marten RAAAAAAAGE!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 08 Jan 2011, 17:59
Marten asks Marigold to try and fix Pintsize:


Marigold: Jesus Christ what did Faye do this time?!

Marten: Actually it was me.


Actually that'd be bad considering how irked Marigold got when she just thought Marten was abusing him. (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1457) I can only imagine her reaction if this happened. And then Marten would have a human body to hide...
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 08 Jan 2011, 18:09
Marten's historically been good about reacting proportionally to Pintsize. Also he regards Pintsize as a friend, not just property. That said, I can imagine frozen waffles in Pintsize's near future.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 08 Jan 2011, 18:12
Marten's historically been good about reacting proportionally to Pintsize. Also he regards Pintsize as a friend, not just property. That said, I can imagine frozen waffles in Pintsize's near future.

WAFFLES!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: AnAverageWriter on 08 Jan 2011, 18:26
And then Marten would have a human body to hide...

Or Marigold would.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 08 Jan 2011, 18:33
Angus comes home to find Marten and Marigold engaging in single combat against each other.

Who's side would he take?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: themacnut on 08 Jan 2011, 19:08
Marten's historically been good about reacting proportionally to Pintsize...

Yes he has-but that was before the last few days. You know, the days where he got dumped by his girlfriend, got blackout drunk then hungover, and is now enduring a visit from his mother. He's already not dealing with his mother's usual hijinks very well because he's still reeling from being dumped and is hungover. Another Pintsize prank on the heels of all that could very well be the proverbial straw.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: St.Clair on 08 Jan 2011, 19:45
It just keeps getting ickier and harder to watch.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: iduguphergrave on 08 Jan 2011, 20:24
That's what she said.










Oh come on it's the weekend and I've been drinking lighten up!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Sharp on 08 Jan 2011, 20:47
(http://i658.photobucket.com/albums/uu307/SharpArcher01/1290844359785.jpg)

This has pretty much been my face at the last two weeks of comics. (minus the two non-canon strips)
I have probably been out-quoted and out-linked by most of the regular posters, but I am going to say my piece dammit! My main gripe with this arc has been the complete mood change since Veronica's arrival.

Pre-breakup we had shenanigans and regular QC. Even during the breakup we had emotions and situations that were familiar to us. We all remembered the underwear incident and so it was no surprise when the tempers started flaring again. Even if we didn't see it coming, we at least understood why it was happening. But this...this THING that has occured, it has really thrown me for a loop!

Maybe it's because it's been so long since we've seen Veronica that we kind of forgot that she was fond of saying whatever seemed funny at the time. Maybe Jeph decided to fiddle around with her character, like Hannelore, I don't know. What I do know, is that when people say "Oh it's QC, it's a comedy. You just aren't looking at it from the funny side." I look at it again, and it isn't funny. QC has (in my opinion) always had a pretty solid equilibrium of comedy and drama. Jeph never lets the drama sit for too long before we get a fart joke or someone mentions what a downer they are being. It's been 14 comics since Veronica arrived. It's been 38 comics since the fight between Dora and Marten started. A fairly large portion of those 38 comics have been related to the breakup, and most of them are downers. We get the little punchline at the end, but does it really make up for the tone of the comic? Basically, I'm saying that as of yet, Jeph hasn't let a downer note go on this long, at least not since The Talk. I wish I could laugh at these comics, but it's the awkward laugh you hear when someone says a really offensive joke. (Ha ha ha?)

Also, we need to factor in the limits of webcomics, Jeph may update 5 days a week, but he still only has 4-6 panels to get across: story, a joke, and a hook to keep us coming back. I think this whole arc would be easier to take if you showed up two months from now when this has all blown over (dear God I hope so) and read it all in a few minutes. But coming back every day to see Marten get kicked again is a completely different experience.

Now, I'm not going to drop the comic, no no no. But it has been hard reading these last couple weeks. It's tiring to see Marten have to go through all of this, and I'm telling you right now, if this all ends with Marten going "Wow, my Mom's disrespectful and ignorant methods have cured me of my depression!" then I really will be disappointed. Thankfully, I have more faith in Jeph as a writer than to end up with that result, but it is a lingering fear. I just really hope that Jeph has a good plan, because I really like Marten as a character and I want to see him succeed! Don't we all?


Hmm, I think I got out everything I wanted to say. Well, if not I'm sure I'll let you all know!  :-D


EDIT: I remembered my final point! Isn't it an unspoken rule that you don't reprimand your children in front of their friends? I was always taught that doing so only breeds resentment, as they are embarrassed in front their peers. Can any of the resident parents here confirm or deny this?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: TheEvilDog on 08 Jan 2011, 20:49
Oh come on it's the weekend and I've been drinking lighten up!

I'll forgive you, depending on what you're drinking.

As for Veronica, the more I think about what's been happening in the comic and what people are discussing, I'm starting to agree with the idea that she might be seeing herself and Henry's failed marriage in Dora and Marten's relationship, and is in some way transferring most if not all of the blame to Marten, most likely subconsciously. The fact that Marten is her son is probably the only thing thats stopping Veronica from actually saying out loud that its his fault.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: westrim on 08 Jan 2011, 23:48
Isn't it an unspoken rule that you don't reprimand your children in front of their friends? I was always taught that doing so only breeds resentment, as they are embarrassed in front their peers. Can any of the resident parents here confirm or deny this?
I can deny my ability to confirm this. Does that help?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: pwhodges on 09 Jan 2011, 00:31
Isn't it an unspoken rule that you don't reprimand your children in front of their friends? I was always taught that doing so only breeds resentment, as they are embarrassed in front their peers. Can any of the resident parents here confirm or deny this?

Sometimes an immediate reprimand is appropriate regardless of company, but in general you're right.  In particular, using  that embarrassment as part of the punishment is a bad thing.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Olymander on 09 Jan 2011, 11:00
Yes, perhaps 'malicious' was a bad choice of words. May I instead replace it with, "blatantly disregarding Marten's wishes"?

I would go with just "thoughtless" or "careless" myself, or possibly "inconsiderate".  I don't feel there's any active malice or thought involved, which your choices seem to imply.  We might disagree on this point (active malice/thought), however.

As well, something I thought about when I read through #459 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=459) when I was hunting down the "Mrs. Reed comments without thinking" strips is her statement about how Marten is an adult and can make his own choices, along with the arguments about whether or not he's being treated like a child or not... it seems to me that there's a bit of a double standard* going on when it comes to how people are arguing about how his mother should treat him.  On the one hand, there was all the hoping and wishing that Mrs. Reed would come swooping in and "fix" everything back when we first heard that she was visiting.  Now, if she'd actually done that, that would have been almost the definition of treating him like a child; "here, sweetie, let Mommy take care of everything for you."  On the other hand, when she doesn't "coddle" him and instead treats things as if they were normal, in a backhanded way, she's treating him as a full adult; "you're old enough to solve all your own problems, dear, and you don't need any help from me."

Now, obviously, these are two extremes, but it does support the proposition that Marten and Mrs. Reed are still trying to work out how their relationship should perhaps function.  The way Mrs. Reed swings back and forth between the positions (treating him like a child one moment, and then leaving him alone for others) strengthens the claim that she doesn't quite know how to deal with him.

* - this phrase is a bit stronger than how I actually mean it, but I can't think of a better one at present.

Addendum - Congratulations to "Is it cold in here?" for becoming the second moderator of this section.  Good luck, and I hope we don't cause you too many sleepless nights!
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Border Reiver on 09 Jan 2011, 12:03
EDIT: I remembered my final point! Isn't it an unspoken rule that you don't reprimand your children in front of their friends? I was always taught that doing so only breeds resentment, as they are embarrassed in front their peers. Can any of the resident parents here confirm or deny this?


There really aren't any written rules for parenting, but Mr. Hodges has definitely hit the nail on the head - generally we don't reprimand in front of friends or other people, but if you really cross the line then public reprimands are warranted.  Just like in your workplace , the boss will ususally take you aside to rip you a new one - but if you are endangering others, or an egregious violation of workplace rules, you may just end up being taken care of in front of your peers. 
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: tomart on 09 Jan 2011, 12:11
And yeah, if this is a light-hearted comedy, then having Veronica hit by a bus would be every bit as funny as this was.  Funnier, in fact.  
Since after her recent behavior, she'd deserve it.
Honestly, I don't understand those who think Veronica's trying to help him.  Someone was right, earlier, pointing out that she's treating Dora like the poor victim while acting like Marten's feelings don't matter, or SHOULD be stomped upon.  Maybe she IS subconsciously feeling her own marital breakup; that would explain a lot, but God, why can't someone point it out to her, and stop this travesty of parenting?
I'm losing faith that Jeph will or can salvage Veronica as a sympathetic character.  Maybe that was his intention, to turn her from what we saw a couple years ago, to an oblivious, selfish oaf who should have stayed home.
...Oooooh, wait; maybe Jeph's going overboard to deny us any shred of pleasure in our fan-spun fantasy of Veronica helping Marten and slamming Dora.   That's a... disappointing thought.  I hope wrenching our expectations doesn't equate to wrenching Marten (and the whole tone of the comic) this badly.   [Uh oh: after our loutish behavior in December, maybe his anger at us is coming through...]
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: westrim on 09 Jan 2011, 12:15
As well, something I thought about when I read through #459 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=459) when I was hunting down the "Mrs. Reed comments without thinking" strips is her statement about how Marten is an adult and can make his own choices, along with the arguments about whether or not he's being treated like a child or not... it seems to me that there's a bit of a double standard* going on when it comes to how people are arguing about how his mother should treat him.  On the one hand, there was all the hoping and wishing that Mrs. Reed would come swooping in and "fix" everything back when we first heard that she was visiting.  Now, if she'd actually done that, that would have been almost the definition of treating him like a child; "here, sweetie, let Mommy take care of everything for you."  On the other hand, when she doesn't "coddle" him and instead treats things as if they were normal, in a backhanded way, she's treating him as a full adult; "you're old enough to solve all your own problems, dear, and you don't need any help from me."

Now, obviously, these are two extremes, but it does support the proposition that Marten and Mrs. Reed are still trying to work out how their relationship should perhaps function.  The way Mrs. Reed swings back and forth between the positions (treating him like a child one moment, and then leaving him alone for others) strengthens the claim that she doesn't quite know how to deal with him.

Well, if she had "swooped in and fixed everything", then all the things she did that are bugging us wouldn't have happened. She'd have had a serious chat with him, not hit on a waitress for him. Greeted his unmet friends with handshakes/ "oh, I've heard so much about you"/ something-not-cougarish, not bear hugs, panic button hitting, and something cougarish. Not hauled out his baby book the instant he went off to nap. Told him she was checking on Dora and make sure she wasn't freaking out too much, not snuck out and lied to him (and gotten outraged when he was upset and snarky after that). Etc. Would it have been coddling? Yes, that would be a legitimate observation. But would it be meddling with his life, embarrassing him at darn near every opportunity from what we see, and prodding the woobie when he's already down from a gut punch? Nope.jpg And she hasn't left him alone at all, from what we've seen. Twice she tried to fix things, the rest she just actively embarrassed him.

There really aren't any written rules for parenting, but Mr. Hodges has definitely hit the nail on the head - generally we don't reprimand in front of friends or other people, but if you really cross the line then public reprimands are warranted.  Just like in your workplace , the boss will usually take you aside to rip you a new one - but if you are endangering others, or an egregious violation of workplace rules, you may just end up being taken care of in front of your peers. 
So parents are bosses, unless you work your way up the chain to become a fellow executive? Hey, this analogy works!

Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: pwhodges on 09 Jan 2011, 13:18
[Uh oh: after our loutish behavior in December <November, actually>, maybe his anger at us is coming through...]

Jeph wouldn't compromise the comic for such low-grade revenge - and I'm sure he will have seen the improvement here in any case.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Pika_power on 09 Jan 2011, 14:08
Yes, perhaps 'malicious' was a bad choice of words. May I instead replace it with, "blatantly disregarding Marten's wishes"?

I would go with just "thoughtless" or "careless" myself, or possibly "inconsiderate".  I don't feel there's any active malice or thought involved, which your choices seem to imply.  We might disagree on this point (active malice/thought), however.

She knows what he doesn't want her to do. We know she knows, because she takes actions so that Marten won't know what she's doing. This is the 'blatantly (and knowingly) disregarding Marten's wishes' part. The thoughtlessness or carelessness comes in when she decides to do it at the worst possible time, instead of waiting for tomorrow.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: ducktape on 09 Jan 2011, 14:25
[Uh oh: after our loutish behavior in December <November, actually>, maybe his anger at us is coming through...]

Jeph wouldn't compromise the comic for such low-grade revenge - and I'm sure he will have seen the improvement here in any case.
Yeah, Jeph's above such things.  

She knows what he doesn't want her to do. We know she knows, because she takes actions so that Marten won't know what she's doing. This is the 'blatantly (and knowingly) disregarding Marten's wishes' part. The thoughtlessness or carelessness comes in when she decides to do it at the worst possible time, instead of waiting for tomorrow.
Right.  As has been already established (too lazy to find/quote), she's good at figuring out interpersonal issues, so surely she has an inkling of what the effects on her actions will be on Marten.  Either she is simply disregarding that or she thinks it will help (this could be true, she's known him longer than anyone currently in the comic).

EDIT: fixed quote syntax
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Zipperstuck on 09 Jan 2011, 15:09
Oooh, Marten can be such a wuss sometimes. He has every right to talk to his mother like that.

It's not because he's her son, that he suddenly can't want his own way of doing things anymore. Seriously, he's an adult man and she's treating him like a little kid. Mostly because he's letting her. That woman needs a cold shower.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: AnAverageWriter on 09 Jan 2011, 15:21
That woman needs a cold shower.

Or a close encounter with a bus.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: ducktape on 09 Jan 2011, 16:15
That woman needs a cold shower.
Or a close encounter with a bus.

She's Marten's MOM, she wouldn't bear him any ill will.  Excessive vilification not necessary (not that either of you is there yet, but in a "just in case" sort of way).
However, either she is not particularly adept at support, likes messing with his mind in what seems to us to be a cruel way, or is perhaps utilizing a previously-tried-and-true method for getting him over breakups, as someone's already said at some point here.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: AnAverageWriter on 09 Jan 2011, 16:38
She's Marten's MOM, she wouldn't bear him any ill will. 

In terms of humans, simply being someone's mother isn't an indicator that someone is a good mom. I've certainly seen enough that if she doesn't bear him "ill will", she certainly does seem to be doing quite a bit to knock him down. Considering he's already been knocked down, it seems like her behavior is pretty Dora-like, from my perspective.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Boomslang on 09 Jan 2011, 16:47
I've actually had a bit of an epiphany just now.

What if Veronica is actually trying to annoy and alienate Marten a bit, so that when she LEAVES he's happy and more independent?


Even if that's not the plan, it'll be the end effect, I think. Of course, I think that Marten needs to hang out a bit with his real friends, like Steve and Faye, after this.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: mary tyler murder on 09 Jan 2011, 18:55
BLUH BLUH, VICTIM BLAMER

I'm honestly surprised that you felt I was making personal attacks, and mildly amused. I was not. Was I being dismissive and pointing out that I thought the post quoted was an excellent example of overwrought blubbering over the fate of Poor Poor Marten? Almost certainly! I'm sorry if that offends.

That being said, you have some pro self-righteousness and assumptions going on in your post, and I'm trying to gauge whether you mean them sincerely or are just trolling me. If you mean them sincerely, may I say that I think you are overinterpreting to the nth degree, and maybe need to calm down and recall what you're reading and that maybe you're projecting? If you are trolling, well, you win! The prize is my fleeting attention. Bask in it!

Okay we're done.

(http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/821/coolstorybroq.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Blackjoker on 09 Jan 2011, 19:05
I've actually had a bit of an epiphany just now.

What if Veronica is actually trying to annoy and alienate Marten a bit, so that when she LEAVES he's happy and more independent?


Even if that's not the plan, it'll be the end effect, I think. Of course, I think that Marten needs to hang out a bit with his real friends, like Steve and Faye, after this.

Eh, I consider Hannelore a real friend too, but she's likely either too intimidated by Martens mother to say anything or just unsure of what to do. Hannelore actually actively tried to help him out after this which I would say would merit her position as real friend.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: jwhouk on 09 Jan 2011, 19:33
Ironically, that's what happened when they first met, too - she actively tried to help Marten get his mind off of Faye by inviting him up to play Scrabble.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 09 Jan 2011, 20:16
That was the effect, and Hannelore is smart enough to have done it that way on purpose, but can we be sure that was her intent?
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: ducktape on 09 Jan 2011, 20:40
That was the effect, and Hannelore is smart enough to have done it that way on purpose, but can we be sure that was her intent?
Can we even be sure what she was thinking at all? She was, after all, on some pretty powerful anti-anxiety meds at the time.  (too lazy to find the exact comic)
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 09 Jan 2011, 23:09
Come to think of it, mixing anti-anxiety meds with alcohol sounds like a bad idea.

The strip where Hannelore explained her confidence at the bar was 1046.
Title: Re: WCDT January 3-7, 2011 (1831-1835)
Post by: tomart on 11 Jan 2011, 09:39
What if Veronica is actually trying to annoy and alienate Marten a bit, so that when she LEAVES he's happy and more independent?
Even if that's not the plan, it'll be the end effect, I think.

No offense, but that's like pushing your kid into a mudpuddle, over and over, so that when you leave he'll shower, put on clean clothes and "feel better."