Jeph Jacques's comics discussion forums

Fun Stuff => CHATTER => Topic started by: est on 08 Sep 2007, 05:31

Title: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: est on 08 Sep 2007, 05:31
NEW PHOTO THREAD

NEW RULES:

1. POST INTERESTING PICTURES THAT ARE NOT FUCKING HUGE
2. 1 OR 2 PICS UNLESS YOU'RE TELLING A PHOTO STORY (OR ARE CUTE ENOUGH TO GET AWAY WITH IT)
3. KEEP THE CHATTER DOWN
4. PLEASE DO NOT BE A CREEPY JERK




HELLO THIS IS ME EATING A TIMTAM IN "SLAM" FORMAT:

TIMTAM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v371/est_xplosif/qc/est_timtam1.jpg)

BITE ONE CORNER
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v371/est_xplosif/qc/est_timtam2.jpg)

BITE OPPOSITE CORNER
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v371/est_xplosif/qc/est_timtam3.jpg)

IT IS IMPOSSIBLE NOT TO LOOK LIKE YOU ARE SUCKING COCK IN THIS STEP
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v371/est_xplosif/qc/est_timtam4.jpg)

DELICIOUS
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v371/est_xplosif/qc/est_timtam5.jpg)

YOUR TURN GOGOGO
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Eris on 08 Sep 2007, 05:45
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/me/timtam1.jpg)
TIM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/me/timtam2.jpg)
TAM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/me/timtam3.jpg)
SLAM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/me/timtam4.jpg)
OM NOM NOM NOM
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/me/timtam6.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Lunchbox on 08 Sep 2007, 05:46
THIS IS ME A COUPLE OF HOURS AFTER DESTROYING SOME FACISTS

(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1344/1284403072_40f6fe275f_o.jpg)

AND ALSO SAVING EARTH IN THE YEAR 4012?
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: fatty on 08 Sep 2007, 05:52
SUP HOMIES
(http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k303/aka-fatty/hoodie.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: est on 08 Sep 2007, 05:53
APPARENTLY WE ALSO ONLY TALK IN CAPS.

MAD WIKKID
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Peet on 08 Sep 2007, 05:55
ONE OF THESE BLURS IS THE GLOWSTICKS AROUND MY ARM.

(http://photos-309.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sctm/v124/46/46/503467309/n503467309_113026_8470.jpg)

I THINK I AM ROUGHLY BELOW THE WORD "STICKS"
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: redglasscurls on 08 Sep 2007, 06:48
HOLY CRAP NEZ PERCE! I am still all kinds of excited about it.
(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v113/77/17/5739266/n5739266_35888796_1655.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Joseph on 08 Sep 2007, 06:49
Time for pictures from the summer!


This is me fonduing a brownie
(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v115/28/6/122501528/n122501528_31719192_4156.jpg)


Mustaches!
(http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v103/158/19/542705192/n542705192_877189_5714.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: redglasscurls on 08 Sep 2007, 06:57
Good lord DF, I never noticed before, but you look like the Evan kid from Superbad, Michael Cera.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v352/redglasscurls/michaelcera.jpg?t=1189259849)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Misereatur on 08 Sep 2007, 06:59
I AM KIND OF BREAKING THE RULES

(http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i2/ffgtthttghyujjfdss/boot.jpg)

BUT YUM CHOCOLATE

EDIT: THE GUN WAS USED TO DESTROY FACISTS. I THINK.
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: tommydski on 08 Sep 2007, 07:38
ALL HAIL THE RULES OF NEW PHOTO THREAD WHICH HAVE BEEN CAST IN UNYIELDING STONE.

HERE IS THE LATEST PHOTOGRAPHICAL EVIDENCE OF MY EXISTENCE.


(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1226/1304482828_f6a9f3431c.jpg)

POTENTIAL POINTS OF DISCUSSION FOR AROUND THE WATER COOLER.
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Misereatur on 08 Sep 2007, 07:46
POTENTIAL POINTS OF DISCUSSION FOR AROUND THE WATER COOLER.
  • LOL! YOU RESEMBLE JESUS/AN OVER-SATURATED LENGTH OF COCK/RICHARD D. JAMES.

Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 08 Sep 2007, 08:01
HELLO PICTURE THREAD. WHAT UP?

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/jimmy5times/IM000831.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Cartilage Head on 08 Sep 2007, 08:06
BADDLE.

(http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c213/hey_there_fatty/BADDLE.jpg)

(WITH A FACIST.)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: ForteBass on 08 Sep 2007, 08:42
Old hair

(http://star.walagata.com/w/fortebass/mobile/Mobile01.jpg)


New Hair!

(http://star.walagata.com/w/fortebass/mobile/Mobile03.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: ZJGent on 08 Sep 2007, 08:53
HOT COCKS I AM WEARING BRACES.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/zeejay_djinn/braces1.png)

I AM FURRY IN THE FACE ALSO.
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: negative creep on 08 Sep 2007, 08:55
ME IN THE PROCESS OF DESTROYING A FASCIST!
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v225/todesfuesch/IMG_2368.jpg)

ALSO: ME AFTER A LONG DAY OF DESTROYING FASCISTS:
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v225/todesfuesch/00101.jpg)
DESTROYING FASCISTS MAKES ME HAPPY!
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: calenlass on 08 Sep 2007, 09:42
I AM ATTEMPTING A DISGUISE



(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/MyPicture-1-4.jpg)



FOR THE INFILTRATION OF AND SUBSEQUENT DESTRUCTION OF FACISTS








GUYS EVEN MY IMAGE TAGS ARE IN CAPS
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: celticgeek on 08 Sep 2007, 10:35
Who is that person in the picture, calenlass?
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Liz on 08 Sep 2007, 10:36
Yay, the picture thread!

It's not the greatest photo, but here's me with straight hair:
(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v112/216/108/33809235/n33809235_31789592_8665.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: bainidhe_dub on 08 Sep 2007, 10:46
I'm teaming up with the local fennec fox community, to destroy fascists!
(http://i21.photobucket.com/albums/b291/bainidhedub/fennec.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: muteKi on 08 Sep 2007, 10:54
FASCISTS CANT WITHSTAND THE INCREDIBLE AWESOMENESS POWER OF AWSOME SHADES
SERIOUSLY THEY ARE LIKE AWESOMENESS INCARNATE
I MEAN DONT YOU THINK THESE SHADES ARE AWESOME ESPECIALLY COUPLED WITH THE LOW LIGHT OF THE ROOM
MY FUTURE IS SO AWESOME I GOTTA WEAR SHADES

(http://aycu13.webshots.com/image/26092/2005415397364759429_th.jpg) (http://allyoucanupload.webshots.com/v/2005415397364759429)

AWESOMENESS
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 08 Sep 2007, 12:02
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/l_21084c63da2b03675277eb21e73fc435.jpg)
SECOND DAY OF SCHOOL = SUCKED
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Tehz on 08 Sep 2007, 12:21
(http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/8477/hellyeslj7.jpg)

SUP QC.
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: schimmy on 08 Sep 2007, 14:02
One does not have time to look after one's hair while one is killing fascists.
(http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee300/n1xxa1/021.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: CmonMiracle on 08 Sep 2007, 14:29
Cute guy.

Sup QC.

Sup Tehz. Nice shirt.  :wink:
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: mooface on 08 Sep 2007, 14:45
ME WITH A FASCIST.

(http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v60/238/83/506147025/n506147025_11305_2577.jpg)

i mean... aw shit, i did it wrong, didn't i?
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: öde on 08 Sep 2007, 15:07
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b117/itsjesuslmao/100_0938.jpg)
New
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b117/itsjesuslmao/100_0939.jpg)
Velvet
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b117/itsjesuslmao/100_0940.jpg)
Blazer
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b117/itsjesuslmao/100_0941.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Johnny C on 08 Sep 2007, 16:27
Ah, I think I'll stretch in my new shirt.

(http://img208.imageshack.us/img208/6079/photo186ij0.jpg)

Oh, and I'm going to be celebrating with a little fire tonight. And a cake.

(http://img507.imageshack.us/img507/3738/photo184cn3.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Storm Rider on 08 Sep 2007, 16:36
THAT CAKE IS SO AWESOME IT DESTROYS FASCISTS

ALSO ROO YOU SHOULD POST THE PICTURES WE TOOK LAST WEEK
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: SeanBateman on 08 Sep 2007, 17:41
chuck,
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: ruyi on 08 Sep 2007, 18:19
misconception, i don't recall if i've ever seen photos of you before. you're very pretty!

also, storm rider is so fun to talk to, particularly when he trails off. thanks again for the frogurtttt

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v321/coolcathay/Photo92.jpg)

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v321/coolcathay/Photo91.jpg)

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v321/coolcathay/Photo89.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Liz on 08 Sep 2007, 18:27
Aww, thanks. That made me smile. :)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Unosuke on 08 Sep 2007, 18:52
I got laser eye surgery, so I look like this now

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v361/Unosuke/Picture723.jpg)

also, those are my fascist destroying sideburns
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 08 Sep 2007, 19:09
öde,

Tehz,

Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: clockworkjames on 08 Sep 2007, 19:17
Man, uno looks so much awsum, sideburns are win.

(http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/5814/dsc00566ci3.jpg)

The tonberry plushies destroy facists.
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 08 Sep 2007, 20:08
GUYS! Johnny's cake is rad! Pay attention to it! In other news, this is what I look like when I listen to Animal Collective.
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Skibas_clavicle/huh.jpg)

ALSO: Tommy's a good lookin' chap, him him.
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: est on 08 Sep 2007, 21:14
hawt, Dan.

pee ess: I realised about a second after I hit submit that it's "kills" not "destroys" but then figured it works anyway so wut ev urr.
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: calenlass on 08 Sep 2007, 21:20
FACISTS


IN MY NOODLES


(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/MyPicture-1-5.jpg)



OM NOM NOM SLURP
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Mnementh on 08 Sep 2007, 21:24
pee ess: I realised about a second after I hit submit that it's "kills" not "destroys" but then figured it works anyway so wut ev urr.

Haha, thanks.  It works either way, as soon as I saw the title I figured I'd try and go for the high contrast hardcore look.  The bike made perfect sense, since I was commuting all over on it today and the whole no oil thing fits my jibe.
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: supertankguy on 08 Sep 2007, 21:29
MY SCREAM DESTROYS FASCISTS
(http://www.sirjohnaldmcgee.com/meScream.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Storm Rider on 08 Sep 2007, 22:45
ALSO I THINK IT IS WORTH NOTING THAT RUYI AND I TOOK THOSE PICTURES IN BERKELEY

THEY DESTROY FASCISTS THERE ON A PRETTY REGULAR BASIS
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: calenlass on 08 Sep 2007, 22:48
BRYAN I AM PRETTY SURE FASCISTS ARE OK PEOPLE AND MAYBE DO NOT NEED TO BE DESTROYED



FACISTS, ON THE OTHER HAND


FUCKING FACISTS
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Storm Rider on 08 Sep 2007, 22:50
MAN IT IS NOT MY FAULT THAT EST CANNOT SPELL

IT'S PROBABLY BECAUSE OF ALZHEIMER'S

YOU KNOW

BECAUSE HE'S OLD

More snappy. - Ally
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: ZJGent on 08 Sep 2007, 22:57
OLD COCK KILLS FASCISTS DEAD.

DIRTY CAPITALISTS, ON THE OTHER HAND, ENJOY DRINKING COPIOUS AMOUNTS OF IT.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/zeejay_djinn/old-cock.jpg)

Those hands are, starting from the top and moving downwards, Katie, Emilio, Bryan, and Me.
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: calenlass on 08 Sep 2007, 22:59
Oh my god!


Oh my god that is so good. I love you so much, Roddy.



Edit: Ok, it isn't a spectacular photoshop, but it is fantastic because of the memories, see.
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: CmonMiracle on 08 Sep 2007, 23:35
Aw, it is like Captain Planet! Except around a bottle of alcohol.

Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Joseph on 08 Sep 2007, 23:38
Good lord DF, I never noticed before, but you look like the Evan kid from Superbad, Michael Cera.

I actually have been getting that a decent amount this past couple of weeks.
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: CmonMiracle on 09 Sep 2007, 00:04
I am tired, guys. College actually requires studying right off the bat! Can't you tell?
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v610/forgettheflowers/ad3ffe46.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: squawk on 09 Sep 2007, 00:45
I HAS A DUSTER
IT OBLITERATES FASCISM

(http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n217/rageaholicdove/09092007003.jpg)

TAKE THAT

(http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n217/rageaholicdove/09092007005.jpg)

WOOO

(http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n217/rageaholicdove/09092007004.jpg)

(also yes that was an archie comic FASCISM DESTROYER HANDBOOK on top of the shitty tv)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 09 Sep 2007, 00:49
MY SWIFFER AND YOUR DUSTER SHOULD GET TOGETHER AND HAVE FASCIST KILLING BABIES

(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/l_4ebb1d7f209f29467b415689b085b3-1.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: est on 09 Sep 2007, 01:35
Man, i totally didn't pay any attention whatsover to basically anything when I made this thread, huh.

THINGS I DID WRONG:

1. IT'S "KILLS", NOT "DESTROYS", YOU MONG
2. IT'S SPELT "FASCISTS" YOU FUCKING ASSHOLE
3. WHY ARE THERE TWO 2'S YOU GODDAMN SHITLICKING DICKSUCKER
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 09 Sep 2007, 01:56
JEN,

I HAVE COME TO THE CONCLUSION WE NEED TO MAKE SURE WE REPRODUCE MORE OFTEN THAN THE FASCISTS.

WE WILL OVERWHELM THEM WITH SHEER WEIGHT OF NUMBERS.

I VOLUNTEER FOR VIGOROUS BREEDING.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: squawk on 09 Sep 2007, 02:02
yuh oh
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Rizzo on 09 Sep 2007, 02:17
DESTROYING FASCISTS WITH OUTRIGHT WANKERY AND MYSPACE POSES
(http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b18/Cthulucore/Image013.jpg)
FUCK YOU, FASCIST CAMERA AND YOUR POOR IMAGE QUALITY, I WILL DESTROY YOU.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 09 Sep 2007, 05:19
DESTROYING FASCISTS WITH A PRETTY NEW HAIRCUT!

(http://img399.imageshack.us/img399/4165/011wr8.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 09 Sep 2007, 07:26
The huge amount of hot people on QC is very suspicious.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 09 Sep 2007, 08:15
THIS IS MY WORKING MODEL FOR KILLING FASCISTS. I WILL KNOCK OUT THEIR GODDAMN BOTTOM CARD.
(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v121/77/17/5739266/n5739266_35828571_2946.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: McTaggart on 09 Sep 2007, 08:55
Maybe it's because I live in one of the windiest cities around, but I cannot believe you're doing that outside.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 09 Sep 2007, 09:37
I thought the same thing. I cannot make those inside with no breeze, so I applaud your skill.
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: Tehz on 09 Sep 2007, 10:04
Hey Tehz where do you live?

Jersey, up north.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 09 Sep 2007, 11:44
That shirt = WANT.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 09 Sep 2007, 12:46
DESTROYING FASCISTS WITH A PRETTY NEW HAIRCUT!

img




Brown hair would be sooo freaking awesome on you. You could pretend to be Faye. (I base this primarily the glasses and your facial shape. Take this as well as you would like. I mean you look really cute in that photo.)
And yes, the lumberjack shirt is so full of win it isn't even funny. Though the shirt itself kinda is. And now if you'll excuse me, I have pics to post.

AND ME BEING EMO, B/C FASCISTS HATE EMONESS IT MAKES THERE MINDS ESSPLODE
(http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v112/206/64/654904785/n654904785_121337_7512.jpg)
THIS PIC MAKE ME SOOOO HAPPY YES IT IS SO EMO THAT IT IS NOT FUNNY
THOUGH MY EXPRESSION IS


FASCISTS ALSO HAVE THERE EYS BLOWN OUT BY SUPERAWESOME SELF PORTRAITS I MEAN SERIOUSLY THIS IMAGE IS SO AWESOME ITS NOT FUNNY
THOUGH THE LIKENESS IS
(or: Why I don't have my own comic)
(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v112/206/64/654904785/n654904785_112010_5393.jpg)
NOW THATS AWESOMENESS MOTHERFUCKER

By the way, the image came well before the picture.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 09 Sep 2007, 13:03
Less caps, better spelling, more funny.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 09 Sep 2007, 13:17
I thought that was the point...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 09 Sep 2007, 15:21
Brown hair would be sooo freaking awesome on you. You could pretend to be Faye. (I base this primarily the glasses and your facial shape. Take this as well as you would like. I mean you look really cute in that photo.)

I do have brown hair! Dark dark chocolate brown hair. And I probably could pretend to be Faye, but I would need more curves. It would be easier to let my hair go back to natural colour and then I would look like Penelope.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Verergoca on 09 Sep 2007, 16:39
(http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d79/Verergoca/Photos/Me/lessyappy.jpg)

GAT BACK TO DESTROYING TEH FACIST BASTARDS!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Johnny C on 09 Sep 2007, 17:03
that picture was funny two years ago
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 09 Sep 2007, 17:03
It's my entire family! (Mom's side, anyways...)

(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1155/1351374331_ac16bba57b.jpg?v=0)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 09 Sep 2007, 17:56
mirror shot!
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/me/mirror.jpg)
(procrastination while getting ready for work, yay!)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 09 Sep 2007, 18:21
I'm killing facists with my pretty new dress!  Getting new clothes is the funnest!  No wait, getting new clothes then camwhoring on the internet is the funnest.
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0622.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0675.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0654.jpg)
P.S Princey you look adorable and your hair is so shiney!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 09 Sep 2007, 19:28
The pretty girl population has increased since the last photo thread, it seems.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 09 Sep 2007, 19:29
We're poised for takeover, actually.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 09 Sep 2007, 21:47
If I kill facists can I get into your pretty new dress?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 09 Sep 2007, 21:49
We're poised for takeover, actually.

SSSSHHHH! We aren't meant to tell them!

(http://img451.imageshack.us/img451/1849/005ue5.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 09 Sep 2007, 21:49
I've got these amazing Marc Jacob's flats that would just be to die for with that.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Joseph on 09 Sep 2007, 21:58
Swings make me happy!

(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v117/171/68/502702842/n502702842_142074_844.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 09 Sep 2007, 22:08
You can wear my dress when I'm done with it Dirk, you'll probably stretch it everywhere so it won't fit me anymore.

And a picture because its the picture thread.
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0697.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: squawk on 09 Sep 2007, 22:47
Wow Joseph, you DO look like George Michael (from AD not Wham!).
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 09 Sep 2007, 22:50
You guys, this is what I look like when I am all sweaty.

(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v107/50/29/48611416/n48611416_31611135_1979.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 10 Sep 2007, 02:01
breaking the pretty girl theme. i am a love slave!

(http://photos-358.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v133/209/40/502738358/n502738358_153400_9022.jpg)

this was taken at the castro (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Castro), which is a really, really fun place. i bet it's even more fun if you're gay!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: anditsdiscontents on 10 Sep 2007, 03:03
(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v113/28/105/557040866/n557040866_475191_44.jpg)

ME (LEFT) AND MY FRIEND MITCH ACTUALLY ATTEMPTING TO DESTROY FASCISTS BY DANCING IN BRIGHTLY COLOURED CLOTHES IN CENTRAL SYDNEY WITH ROUGHLY TEN THOUSAND OTHER LIKEMINDED SOULS.

it was the anti-APEC/anti-George Bush protest on the weekend. there were actual fascists there counter-protesting, or something:

(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v113/149/125/703290356/n703290356_1211206_7144.jpg)

fuckers.
they were surrounded and told to go home by and stop handing out racist leaflets.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 10 Sep 2007, 03:09
Oh man, another Sydney-ite? I swear, they're coming out of the woodwork at the mere mention of killing fascists.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: anditsdiscontents on 10 Sep 2007, 03:14
i think it's cos we are the city of the cronulla riots
and fascists go to every sydney big day out and beat up people who don't kiss the flag.

so we are attracted by the idea of destroying fascists.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Verergoca on 10 Sep 2007, 03:55
Yey Sydney!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: fatty on 10 Sep 2007, 04:12
I think sydney is self-obsessed. We even take over random photothreads to discuss this.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Verergoca on 10 Sep 2007, 04:26
SYDNEY!

(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1132/1080336892_1a534637fa.jpg?v=0)

FUCK YEAH!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: negative creep on 10 Sep 2007, 07:42
wait, racist anarcho-syndicalists are counter-protesting a protest against globalisation? what? i'm confused.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 10 Sep 2007, 08:05
Judging from the part of the sign I can read, it seems to me like they're supporting globalization.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: negative creep on 10 Sep 2007, 08:09
yes, that's what confused me and what i was trying to say.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 3Z3VH on 10 Sep 2007, 08:12
There is a serious problem here....  This place is WAY to sexy, we need to get some uggos to come to this forum STAT, or we may explode.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 10 Sep 2007, 08:14
You rang?

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/jimmy5times/IM000816.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 3Z3VH on 10 Sep 2007, 08:19
Too late to play that card Jimmy, you already posted in the thread so you were included in the statement.  Sorry bro.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 10 Sep 2007, 08:28
Yeah I can deal with that.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: MuckThatGuy on 10 Sep 2007, 09:44
There is a serious problem here....  This place is WAY to sexy, we need to get some uggos to come to this forum STAT, or we may explode.

Allow me.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v511/sbreckling/Photo48.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v511/sbreckling/Photo53.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v511/sbreckling/Photo58.jpg)

 :-)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 10 Sep 2007, 10:54
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/Mosag/Foto85.jpg)

This chord kills fascists

(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/Mosag/Foto86.jpg)

So does this.
Title: Re: This photothread destroys facists
Post by: pilsner on 10 Sep 2007, 14:31
THIS MACHINE KILLS FASCISTS.

All you need is a fixed gear bike, some SPDs, and a pair of these:

[img width= height=]http://www.mspiercing.com/ProductImages/s-nipple-ring-cones-spikes-486.jpg[/img]
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 10 Sep 2007, 14:34
You guys, I'm fighting fascism with odd faces, hickies, and new favorite piercings.
(http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q228/andlemonade/P3040093.jpg)

(http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q228/andlemonade/P3040107.jpg)




I've resized these so many times, but they still seem huge to me. I don't know. I'm sorry.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Neuvost on 10 Sep 2007, 15:34
I've just spied a fascist and I am calmly and cooly deciding on the best way to destroy him.

(http://img166.imageshack.us/img166/1016/lookatmetq0.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: supersheep on 10 Sep 2007, 15:44
I think that the anarcho-syndicalists' banner has been shopped somewhat... The bit at the top says "Think Global, Act Local," which is pro-globalisation in that it is in favour of globalising resistance.

I'M FIGHTING FASCISM BY MACKING ON SATAN'S MATE (SATAN'S MATE NOT SHOWN)
(http://img102.imageshack.us/img102/2474/blehep5.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: MusicScribbles on 10 Sep 2007, 16:40
MY PICTURE HAS BEEN TAKEN BY VOYEURISTIC FASCISTS WHILST I SLEPT.
(http://i183.photobucket.com/albums/x101/MusicScribbles/Stephensplaypictures033.jpg)
TOO TIRED TO KILL FASCISTS NOW, WILL SLEEP ON IT.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: vegkitkat on 10 Sep 2007, 17:08
This is what I looked like before I went off to school to fight fascists!

(http://img370.imageshack.us/img370/321/goobyepartyve6.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mfpole on 10 Sep 2007, 18:26
Sorry Ashley, Fuck you.
(http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q249/mfpole/sanjaya-biggest-fan-ashley-ferl.jpg)
Me and my mom being super-tourists. I make stupid squinty faces for my smile.
(http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q249/mfpole/DSCN1496.jpg)

Sorry, if the pictures are too big. I'm kinda at a loss on how to resize them.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 10 Sep 2007, 18:27
STOCK PHOTOSHOP FILTERS HAVE SOMETHING TO DO WITH FASCISTS OR SOMETHING

(http://www.pretentiousgamer.com/photos/photoabuse.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Scrambled Egg Machine on 10 Sep 2007, 18:41
(http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q59/scrambledeggmachine/Picture005.jpg)

Sup? It/s an old photo, but my camera is borked.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: sandysmilinstrange on 10 Sep 2007, 19:28
Dag, Ozymandias is SERIOUS about the Fascist issue...

Also, my giant metal Indian distroys fascism like no other.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v37/ceeingred/620939-R1-08-7A_009.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 10 Sep 2007, 20:20
My ridiculously awesome hat does not destroy fascists, but it renders them speechless in order to let others do the destroying.

(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1385/1358258698_119e398c2a_m.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: heather on 11 Sep 2007, 05:45
I fight fascists with TECHNOLOGY:

(http://www.heatherd.org/images/dee_imate.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 11 Sep 2007, 06:15
Why's everyone gotta hate on fascists?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 11 Sep 2007, 06:59
Because.

Are you a fascist, Joe? Must we hate on you as well?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 11 Sep 2007, 10:51
Fascists hate teh ghey...

Ie. me in this pic:

(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/Mosag/64460.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 11 Sep 2007, 10:58
This fascist kills you fuckin reactionaries with a WRENCH!

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v209/Seanbateman/Photo12.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ThePQ4 on 11 Sep 2007, 11:26
I guess I'm playing blind to the facists by not wearing my glasses, yays.

(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y147/ThePQ4/Picture64.jpg)

(And I don't remember my pics coming out this grainy before!! I think the lighting in my new room is crap...whatever. Some day I will get a nice digital camera and not care anymore).
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 11 Sep 2007, 12:24
Back to the task at hand.
I bought a pair of giant, fascist-fighting scissors to keep them out of my new shiny dorm room.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v631/kauhornz/Photo32.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Johnny C on 11 Sep 2007, 14:10
Allow me.

I "aww'd" at your posts though. Try harder.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 11 Sep 2007, 14:37
Back to the task at hand.
I bought a pair of giant, fascist-fighting scissors to keep them out of my new shiny dorm room.

Now that's more like it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 11 Sep 2007, 16:04
YUM YUM CUPCAKE MIX.
(http://img406.imageshack.us/img406/3856/baking007lb3.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 11 Sep 2007, 16:40
And since I didn't post pictures earlier, here is how I deal with fascists:

First I knock them out with my spatula of doom.

(http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b198/andthentherewaslindsey/grill2.jpg)

And then I show them the grill.

(http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b198/andthentherewaslindsey/grill.jpg)

And that's the last thing they see.


I don't get too many fascists 'round here.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Unosuke on 11 Sep 2007, 18:08
This fascist kills you fuckin reactionaries with a WRENCH!

*angry man with a wrench*

You sir! I challenge you to a duel at dawn! Sideburns at 10 paces!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 11 Sep 2007, 19:54
You know whats cute?






Babies.
(http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q228/andlemonade/P3040074.jpg)
And cute girls, but that goes without saying.


Aren't we freaking adorable?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: MikeyCade on 11 Sep 2007, 21:10
I kill fascists with that gun, the shiny silver thing on my jacket says Sheriff.

(http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j244/MikeyCade/gangstas.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: clockworkjames on 11 Sep 2007, 21:48
I met this cat on my way back to the flat from work where I had just boutght a monitor (with a nice employee discount) and he said he needed it to jump down on and in doing so, destroy some fascists. Who am I to refuse?
(http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/7795/dsc00576gy0.jpg)
(The cat was really fucking cool, and had a cool meow and pretty eyes and he wanted lots of attention and tummy rubs so I stayed and missed 2 trains but it was worth it.)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 11 Sep 2007, 21:51
You should have taken the cat home with you, because IT IS SO FREAKING CUTE.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 11 Sep 2007, 22:47
Aren't we freaking adorable?

No.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 11 Sep 2007, 23:10
But surely Fatty and I are adorable...

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/jimmy5times/Aliandmyself2.jpg)

...Even if she looks a little drunk...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Verergoca on 12 Sep 2007, 01:32
(http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d79/Verergoca/Photos/Me/S5001470r.jpg)

So... Sup?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Oli on 12 Sep 2007, 06:42
(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v112/121/79/709625965/n709625965_276578_105.jpg)

Solid Snake destroys fascists.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 12 Sep 2007, 06:42
Oh god I remember that game.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 12 Sep 2007, 06:52
Solid Snake destroys fascists.

Yes.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Misereatur on 12 Sep 2007, 07:53
Ok, thread over, thanks for playing.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Joseph on 12 Sep 2007, 08:26
This peacock is on the car I drove around all summer.  It wandered around the area I was working a lot, and would try and come inside buildings a bunch.  There was also a less colourful lady one.  On facebook, this picture is tagged as me, so it counts!

(http://photos-528.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v107/28/6/122501528/n122501528_31703214_9555.jpg)

Here's me in the car, GETTING READY TO DRIVE OVER FASCISTS

(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v107/28/6/122501528/n122501528_31702890_8133.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 12 Sep 2007, 11:00
I'm fighting facism with my new friend, Tom Noonan. 

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b131/sutekitatakai/IMG_3339.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 12 Sep 2007, 11:04
[pic]fishy towel[/pic]

So... Sup?


MINE IS IN COLOUR

(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/DSCF0004-3.jpg)

FASCIST



Edit: Goddamn, guys, I cannot even find my own posts anymore. This is going to take some getting used to.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 12 Sep 2007, 13:01
That was just evil, Calenlass.

Damn you.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: carnivoracious on 12 Sep 2007, 14:45
That was just evil, Calenlass.

Damn you.

AMEN

Also...(http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u264/carnivoracious/bigscream.jpg)
My primal scream destroys/kills fascists/facists efficiently.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 12 Sep 2007, 15:12
Your shoes are already destroying fascists with their sheer awesomeness.

Also, the posts on that bed could do some damage.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 12 Sep 2007, 15:47
And since I didn't post pictures earlier, here is how I deal with fascists:

First I knock them out with my spatula of doom.

(http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b198/andthentherewaslindsey/grill2.jpg)

It's the Malaysian Battle Spatula!!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 12 Sep 2007, 17:45
Solid Snake destroys fascists.

Did you draw stubble on your face?

Awesome.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 12 Sep 2007, 18:19
It's too lovely a day here to fight fascists.  Also I am sleepy!
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0732.jpg)

I should play in the sunshine.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 12 Sep 2007, 18:50
Ebony Willow, you are pretty cute.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Darkbluerabbit on 12 Sep 2007, 19:12
(http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p316/darkbluerabbit/Swankalicious.jpg)

I attack fascists with a plastic ninja sword, while wearing a dashing hat!

(http://i131.photobucket.com/albums/p316/darkbluerabbit/Haircut005.jpg)

If the situation calls for stealth, I resourcefully cut off my hair and use it as a mustache!

A...pink...mustache. 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: FruitKat on 12 Sep 2007, 21:45
My double-shot flat white and vicious smile scares fascists...
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y135/starlightrecycler/katcoffee.jpg)
And makes them wish they had never even tried to mess with this caffeine-fueled fighting machine! RARRR!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: E. Spaceman on 12 Sep 2007, 22:48
pretty kat! (both, actually)



(http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q78/ESpaceman/pablo002.jpg)


my dad bought some sunglasses, but they are too small for him. sadly I can't wear them either due to being blind. I think i neeed to get contacts and a shoegaze band now.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 12 Sep 2007, 23:08
Check it out yo, new hairs!

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/jimmy5times/DSC00188.jpg)

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/jimmy5times/DSC00187.jpg)

Also I know I'm breaking the rules a little but... 'Sup cuties?
(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/jimmy5times/DSC00179.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 13 Sep 2007, 01:43
My double-shot flat white and vicious smile scares fascists...
And makes them wish they had never even tried to mess with this caffeine-fueled fighting machine! RARRR!

I am so glad I am not a fascist!

That's the best photo I've seen in all the photo threads (also you are pretty).
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Unosuke on 13 Sep 2007, 07:41
I use these for fascist punching

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v361/Unosuke/gloves.jpg)

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v361/Unosuke/glovehand.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 13 Sep 2007, 07:44
I use these for fascist punching
oo, I have a pair of those somewhere. Also, the sparring shin guards. They're just thin pieces of foam, but something about wearing them feels badass.

Also, we're on the fifth page and people are still talking about fascists. I'm wondering when the whole "lol fascists" thing will finally flow over and we can go back to a regular ole picture thread..
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Oli on 13 Sep 2007, 07:47
we're on the fifth page

LIES!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 13 Sep 2007, 08:06
wtf happened, I could have sworn I clicked on a 5 to get to this page.

Of course, I am smoking giant rocks of crack right now. rocks the size of your head
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 13 Sep 2007, 09:30
Also, we're on the fifth page and people are still talking about fascists. I'm wondering when the whole "lol fascists" thing will finally flow over and we can go back to a regular ole picture thread..

Guys.

Please?

Can we?

Please?

Pretty Please?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: FruitKat on 13 Sep 2007, 10:20
You know guys that my smile doesn't actually kill fascists right? I just took a normal picture and put it into that context for sillyness right? If you don't read the words, it's just a normal picture thread right?

Also, Joe: Seeing as thus far you have not contributed an actual photo to this actual photo thread like many others have and are instead complaining about it, I choose to read your post as: MEW MEW MEW WHINE WHINE WHINE.

Edit: (http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y135/starlightrecycler/katcoffee2.jpg)
My coffee just destroyed YOU!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 13 Sep 2007, 10:58
This is now FruitKat's thread.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 13 Sep 2007, 12:24
On a recent trip to San Francisco my fiancee bought me this shirt:
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y120/jhocking/sanfran.jpg)

When we were walking to the supermarket the other day, she pointed out that between living so close to Boystown and, well, San Francisco on the shirt, when I'm wearing the shirt people probably assume I'm gay. She said this like she just realized it, as if it weren't her plan all along. In retaliation, I pointed out that to complement the Subaru she recently purchased she needs to get a mullet and start wearing flannel shirts.

Also, Joe: Seeing as thus far you have not contributed an actual photo to this actual photo thread like many others have and are instead complaining about it, I choose to read your post as: MEW MEW MEW WHINE WHINE WHINE.
FIGHT YOU
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pilsner on 13 Sep 2007, 12:54
You know guys that my smile doesn't actually kill fascists right? I just took a normal picture and put it into that context for sillyness right? If you don't read the words, it's just a normal picture thread right?

That photo is incredible.  What kind of camera was used?  Is the person taking it a serious photographer?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Yakob on 13 Sep 2007, 13:06
I kill fascists AT SCHOOL!

(http://i178.photobucket.com/albums/w274/Yakob42/ID.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 13 Sep 2007, 13:16
Ladies and Gentleman, someone is in attendance who knows all about Jammin'.

Please direct all questions you might have regarding Jammin' to Mr. Roberts.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: MikeyCade on 13 Sep 2007, 13:20
Masked bandit plays guitar (also giggles at the name Sackville)

(http://i82.photobucket.com/albums/j244/MikeyCade/IMG_2394.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: schimmy on 13 Sep 2007, 13:22
Oh my! What is a girl to do?
(http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee300/n1xxa1/013.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 13 Sep 2007, 13:33
Masked bandit plays guitar (also giggles at the name Sackville)
I did the same. The giggling, that is. I do not have a guitar to play.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 13 Sep 2007, 13:39
HEY, I know someone who lives in Sackville! He gradumatated from that high school like four years ago, though.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Yakob on 13 Sep 2007, 13:41
That's pretty neat.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 13 Sep 2007, 13:54
gradumatated

At first I read that as "grad-mutated" and got this mental image of someone graduating and then turning into some Hulk-like monster. Just thought you should know.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: schimmy on 13 Sep 2007, 13:57
That would be so much better than getting a diploma.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 13 Sep 2007, 14:02
Wait schimmy is a girl?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Orbert on 13 Sep 2007, 14:50
On a recent trip to San Francisco my fiancee bought me this shirt:

I'm so used to seeing mirror shots reversed that the mirror shot of you not reversed is blowing my mind. Did you flip it back in Photoshop or something, or is the shirt actually backwards?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: carnivoracious on 13 Sep 2007, 15:35
Actually, the camera is backwards.  It takes photos with the viewfinder, not the lens.

I did the same thing with my cellphone in my picture actually (true).
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 13 Sep 2007, 16:00
heh, it's a digital camera, so there isn't any viewfinder.

Yeah, I reversed it in Photoshop to make the shirt legible. It looks weird to me too. It's like when you hear your own voice recorded; you're like "whoah, is that really how I sound to other people?"
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: thermodynamics on 13 Sep 2007, 21:08
(http://bp2.blogger.com/_SrtNZI0DkLg/RtOV_94G1bI/AAAAAAAAAE8/5lHkZe76E9Q/s320/img112.jpg)

in the hospital ER after i had a brain hemorrhage.

(http://bp0.blogger.com/_SrtNZI0DkLg/RuoIbhwmv7I/AAAAAAAAAFM/IAs1V9xf8O4/s320/alqueda.jpg)

me being facist

(http://bp1.blogger.com/_SrtNZI0DkLg/RuoIbxwmv9I/AAAAAAAAAFc/sfUF4NGPTGY/s320/img130.jpg)

hair being huge

(http://bp1.blogger.com/_SrtNZI0DkLg/RuoIbxwmv-I/AAAAAAAAAFk/s_7mRz0Tm44/s320/img127.jpg)

hair not so huge.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: FruitKat on 13 Sep 2007, 21:13

That photo is incredible.  What kind of camera was used?  Is the person taking it a serious photographer?

No! It was just my friend Jesse when we were sitting in a cafe and I was taking pictures of him, so he took a few of me. What is cool though is the backdrop is glass, and so you can see a reflection of the cafe in the glass. Also its just a Canon powershot used but a few weeks ago I asked the lovely Lunchbox how she gets her photos looking all fancy, and she showed me the curves function and filters on teh photoshop, and wah lah!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 13 Sep 2007, 21:19
heh, it's a digital camera, so there isn't any viewfinder.

Yeah, I reversed it in Photoshop to make the shirt legible. It looks weird to me too. It's like when you hear your own voice recorded; you're like "whoah, is that really how I sound to other people?"

It turns out that seeing yourself as others see you (as opposed to seeing a reflection) is vaguely distrubing to most people. Possibly because you are only used to seeing a reversed image of yourself.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 13 Sep 2007, 21:40
I only realised I had a lisp when I did a voice recording for that old thread. I confronted my boyfriend and said "Do I have a lisp?" and he just kind of looked at me stupidly.
Says it's cute.
Blegh.


<picture to come>
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: clockworkjames on 13 Sep 2007, 22:45
(http://img127.imageshack.us/img127/5402/dscf0155ur2.jpg)
My puppy (Who is now big and fat) Destroys facists by drooling and biting them.
(my hand andknee also get drooled and bitten).
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 13 Sep 2007, 22:58
Cute!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Elizzybeth on 14 Sep 2007, 00:03
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v321/NvrTooMuchPython/Photo90.jpg)

I kiss a cat in an attempt to change the winds of the photothread.  Cat looks unhappy.

This is how I will make the fascists unhappy.

Whoops.  Failure all around.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 14 Sep 2007, 02:09
THIS THREAD WILL NOW TAKE A CAT DIRECTION.

(http://www.pretentiousgamer.com/photos/masta.jpg)

The Master and I combine into one being and demand it!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SusurrusIgnoramus on 14 Sep 2007, 06:23
i know this isn't a photo of me, but i couldn't help but post it after the cat pics:

(http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/cat_proximity.png)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Neuvost on 14 Sep 2007, 08:14
[Pretty picture.]
My coffee just destroyed YOU!
These colors are really, really great!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Elemental Poser on 14 Sep 2007, 10:36
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/tshsu/0813071344.jpg)
BANDANA GLORY!!!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: TheBoredOne on 14 Sep 2007, 11:22
Trying to look serious here, and not dumb at all.
(http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/6480/picture039sz2.jpg)

I got lazy and stopped trimming for a week or so.
So I took a brush and tried to make cool Wolverine swooshes with my sideburns.
(http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/231/picture009kw1.jpg)

They were trimmed immediately afterwards.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 14 Sep 2007, 11:28
Your mistake was that Wolverine doesn't wear glasses, he wears the bloody innards of his enemies.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: schimmy on 14 Sep 2007, 11:40
TomAy-to, tom-ah-to.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Boro_Bandito on 14 Sep 2007, 14:32
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y110/Wildkyn/PhilipsQCpictures001.jpg)

In response to far above's "expensive" gloves, there be mah cheapies.

(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y110/Wildkyn/PhilipsQCpictures003.jpg)

Hello QC, how was your summer?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: axerton on 14 Sep 2007, 17:55
Goddammit I can't find my cat to take photos of.

Edit: Pictures of kitten as promised, I could have made a new post, but I couldn't be bothered.
(http://i94.photobucket.com/albums/l120/axerton/kitten.jpg)
If I can get my camera to work I'll find photos of her when she was younger playing in a shoe box, one tiny paw shooting out of hole in the box is possibly the cutest thing ever.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tokuma on 14 Sep 2007, 18:45
I see your kitties, and raise you a drunkard kitty...drunk on all natural carbonated fruit beverages...
(http://lh5.google.com/Skayua/Rus1ywuqT2I/AAAAAAAAAbM/T19SKfU-oTY/s400/IMG_1470.JPG)

I swear that I am not choking him. It is really hard to take a photo of yourself with a dSLR while holding a cat.
(http://lh3.google.com/Skayua/Rus4rQuqT4I/AAAAAAAAAb0/RmBKhqjoEKQ/s400/IMG_1478.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Johnny C on 14 Sep 2007, 19:11
I see your kitties, and raise you a drunkard kitty...

Dude that's a bottle of Izze.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tokuma on 14 Sep 2007, 20:49
True...it was the only bottle I had access to while setting up my cat for a surprise photo shoot. I have edited the first description to more accurately reflect my cats beverage of choice.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 3Z3VH on 14 Sep 2007, 20:54
It was Catnip flavoured Izze.  The cat was high as a kite, and drunk on immeasurable pleasure.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: axerton on 14 Sep 2007, 21:48
The latest member of my menagerie.
(http://i94.photobucket.com/albums/l120/axerton/Image008.jpg)
The foal was born this morning and when the photo was taken was less than an hour old.
Apologies for the lack of self in photo and the crappy quality.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 14 Sep 2007, 23:19
You have ponies! I have a TB Paint mare :)

(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/l_2d09851ce43c98de2787a2c65ed61549.jpg)
My dress for homecoming!

(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/l_06f1359cb135f2938c1038c461b8f756.jpg)
And the sweatshirt I won from a Mountain Dew give away
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 3Z3VH on 15 Sep 2007, 01:54
Hot dress RWS, the retro look works on you.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: supertankguy on 15 Sep 2007, 07:00
Black cats for everyone!

(http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/4641/romulusbi1.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 15 Sep 2007, 07:02
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/willowow2.jpg)
Tortoiseshell cats are better.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: fatty on 15 Sep 2007, 07:37
OM NOM NOM NOM
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1323/1386147521_ba37952f4e.jpg?v=0)
PICTURES OF BEN, HANNAH AND ERIK! (http://www.flickr.com/photos/aka-fatty/tags/picnicartgallery/) At the botanical gardens!

Edit: yay new page!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 15 Sep 2007, 09:42
PUNCH!
My roommate and I got ahold of a pair of boxing gloves
(http://photos-266.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sctm/v121/77/17/5739266/n5739266_35970116_4271.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 15 Sep 2007, 09:48
And you thought pretending to be the girl from The Ring would give you an edge in the fight?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 15 Sep 2007, 09:51
It probably would, she doesn't like scary movies much. I had the right glove though, so I already had the advantage.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ZJGent on 15 Sep 2007, 10:13
YELLOW MINI. (bash)

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/zeejay_djinn/CIMG6501.jpg)

It's a shame we didn't get a photo of me fondling the nipples... I mean headlamps.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 15 Sep 2007, 10:17
You're doing it wrong, Roddy, dear. (The tailpipe is still on the other end in British cars. I know this.)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 15 Sep 2007, 11:34
My youngest sister sent me photos she took when my mom and sisters were here visiting a couple weekends ago.

My sisters and I at the lake:
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y120/jhocking/montrose.jpg)
I just realized my sister has that stupid trendy hairstyle where the girl looks like a 50s greaser.

Here one sister and I are pedaling my mom around on some silly quadcycle-thing:
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y120/jhocking/quadcycle.jpg)
Note that my steering wheel did nothing.

Also, I'm fairly sure my mom will hate this photo:
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y120/jhocking/mom.jpg
Accordingly, I have made several backups to ensure that it is preserved forever.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: TheFuriousWombat on 15 Sep 2007, 12:30

When I get drunk I do things I shouldn't. Case in point:

(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v123/66/15/1370430288/n1370430288_30099463_8430.jpg)

I need to be more careful.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 15 Sep 2007, 13:02
Hot dress RWS, the retro look works on you.

Why thank you. I just hope someone else doesn't have the same dress tonight >.<
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: sandysmilinstrange on 15 Sep 2007, 14:52
TheFuriousWombat, your friend is hot. Do you have his number, or are things too awkward between you now?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 15 Sep 2007, 15:23
Why thank you. I just hope someone else doesn't have the same dress tonight >.<

It happens more often than you'd think. I happen to be wearing that exact same dress this very minute.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 15 Sep 2007, 18:09
Hasn't my Benjamin grown?
From(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/benjamin.jpg)
To(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/me/benjamin2-2.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 15 Sep 2007, 18:37
This pretty much sums up our entire weekend.
(http://img352.imageshack.us/img352/5012/001yo1.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Aztex on 15 Sep 2007, 19:32
after being dead from the internets hai to all!

(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v107/249/85/521556008/n521556008_87595_5029.jpg)

violins?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: carnivoracious on 15 Sep 2007, 20:12
(http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u264/carnivoracious/strokeybeardmeeting.jpg)
Strokey beard meeting about whether to continue to destroy/kill fascists/facists or not...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 15 Sep 2007, 20:27
My kitty does not like having his picture taken.  I have to hold him down to make him not run away.  But I do loves him so!
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0738.jpg)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0735.jpg)
Yay kitties!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 15 Sep 2007, 20:45
This pretty much sums up our entire weekend.
[PEENK DSes]

I cannot stand those stings sticking out of my GBA port when I'm playing DS games. I wish they'd just made the port deeper so the games don't stick out. What were you playing?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 3Z3VH on 15 Sep 2007, 20:49
It was Katamari
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 15 Sep 2007, 21:16
after being dead from the internets hai to all!

violins?



The best part of this picture is the ghost.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 16 Sep 2007, 01:18
It happens more often than you'd think. I happen to be wearing that exact same dress this very minute.

OH SNAP! I showed up...and like...4 people had variations of my dress.And oh, I got banned from all the school dances for the rest of sophomore year. Fucking security guards caught me freak dancing with this...yeah...wont go there. Here's a pic taken right before I left. (http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN7166.jpg)
I was super cold. And it was windy. And dresses + wind = not cool
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 16 Sep 2007, 01:43
Wait. You were banned? For dancing? What?????
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: backstagebetty on 16 Sep 2007, 02:06
Everybody cut, everybody cut...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 16 Sep 2007, 02:43
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN7166.jpg)

You look a little like a young Diana Rigg with your hair like that
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 16 Sep 2007, 12:27
When did the kids start using the word "freak dancing?"  I had to look it up to figure out you were talking about grinding.

We started using freaking, when grinding didn't even begin to cover what we were doing...yeah..it got that bad...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: supertankguy on 16 Sep 2007, 13:30
I think at that point dancing no longer covers what you were doing unless it's being used as a metaphor.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 16 Sep 2007, 13:47
I wasn't even doing it bad! Some of those girls danced like they belonged on a pole....
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 3Z3VH on 16 Sep 2007, 13:52
Fascists !
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 16 Sep 2007, 14:21
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v209/Seanbateman/Photo16-1.jpg)

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 16 Sep 2007, 14:50
Nice burns, Kieffer.

I tried to make an olde version (http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i318/tommydski/olde-fall.png) of Daniel's previous photo but his trainers ruined the effect somewhat!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Johnny C on 16 Sep 2007, 16:30
(http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/thumb/d/d8/Isaac_asimov.jpg/200px-Isaac_asimov.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 16 Sep 2007, 16:36
olde version (http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i318/tommydski/olde-fall.png)

I killed some fascists back in the war.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 16 Sep 2007, 16:59
Which war?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Kylos on 16 Sep 2007, 17:07
(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v113/69/35/286000311/n286000311_606118_3271.jpg)
We found a fascist at the fair.
There was no accompanying photo of the carnage.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: IronOxide on 16 Sep 2007, 17:45
What kind of fair were you at?

Most of my local fairs are generally Nazi-free, maybe that's just a local quirk though.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 16 Sep 2007, 18:01
I tried to make an olde version of Daniel's previous photo but his trainers ruined the effect somewhat!

Trainers? I thought they were spats (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Spats)!!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Dimmukane on 16 Sep 2007, 20:51
[Isaac]

[/Asimov]
This is what Kieffer is gonna look like in 60 years.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 16 Sep 2007, 21:13
When did the kids start using the word "freak dancing?"  I had to look it up to figure out you were talking about grinding.

We started using freaking, when grinding didn't even begin to cover what we were doing...yeah..it got that bad...

Am I the only one who was a bit grossed out by this statement?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 16 Sep 2007, 21:21
[Isaac]

[/Asimov]
This is what Kieffer is gonna look like in 60 years.

Oh god I hope so.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 16 Sep 2007, 23:43
Am I the only one who was a bit grossed out by this statement?

Nope! Damn kids...

Anyway. Here:
(http://a761.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/92/l_1796f846d1e437088c2d399c3aa7db18.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: CmonMiracle on 16 Sep 2007, 23:46
Nice burns, Kieffer.

I tried to make an olde version (http://i75.photobucket.com/albums/i318/tommydski/olde-fall.png) of Daniel's previous photo but his trainers ruined the effect somewhat!

I like this photo. I should just make you olde-fy mine.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v610/forgettheflowers/hjff10209gh9.jpg)

I like to think Daniel and I would have corresponded by Pony Express back in the old days.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 17 Sep 2007, 00:07
If Kieffer writes something as awesome as the Foundation trilogy I would be pretty into that.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 17 Sep 2007, 02:33
If Kieffer writes something as awesome as the Foundation trilogy I would be pretty into that.

I'm going to publish 5 volumes of transcripts form this forum as original works.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: The extra letter on 17 Sep 2007, 04:23
Ebony Wilow, is that a Russian blue?

And to actually make this post worth posting, a picture of me with Tabby the Russian blue from about 4 years ago. Note the claws dug firmly into the collarbone. She insists on doing that whenever someone holds her.

(http://img101.imageshack.us/img101/8343/andhiscatzr1.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 17 Sep 2007, 04:30
I am going to get a male Russian Blue one day and call him Alexander. They are such pretty cats...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: made from ribs on 17 Sep 2007, 04:30
(http://a551.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/108/l_afdf45705187872804ba66dce00f119e.png)

PIKACHU GO!!!! ...kill some fascists!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: McTaggart on 17 Sep 2007, 05:57
I think I'm in love.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: carnivoracious on 17 Sep 2007, 07:51
Of the screennames I've seen so far, made from ribs is my favorite.

*ps. new pics coming soon.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 2.0 on 17 Sep 2007, 07:55
(http://aycu11.webshots.com/image/26890/2002493644343924931_rs.jpg)
stringy gummy candy and poor cellphone pictures injures facist eyes.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 17 Sep 2007, 09:24
All hail the sideburns!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pilsner on 17 Sep 2007, 11:58
If Kieffer writes something as awesome as the Foundation trilogy I would be pretty into that.

I'm going to publish 5 volumes of transcripts form this forum as original works.

The Dickfish Chronicles

With complimentary blurb from Zombie Douglas Adams.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: clockworkjames on 17 Sep 2007, 12:12
(http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/4358/200709171yp1.jpg) HAIL TO SIDEBURNS!

They destroy so much more than facists, like the need for ID.
Although mine are poorly developed after I was told to get rid of them for work :(
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 17 Sep 2007, 12:16
You, CJames, are a good looking guy.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 17 Sep 2007, 12:36
It seems I have found my doppelganger!!

(http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/4358/200709171yp1.jpg)

(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/Mosag/Foto97.jpg)

This is actually kind of spooky.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 17 Sep 2007, 13:46
He even has a goatee (sorta).
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: clockworkjames on 17 Sep 2007, 14:09
He even has a goatee (sorta).

I shave each friday and saterday for work, if I don't I get fired.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 17 Sep 2007, 14:38
I propose a BATTLE TO THE DEATH.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 17 Sep 2007, 15:05
Sorry about having four, but it's a full on story:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Tonberry%20Duel/P9170002_01.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Tonberry%20Duel/P9170003_01.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Tonberry%20Duel/P9170004Edit.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Tonberry%20Duel/P9170005_01edit.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: made from ribs on 17 Sep 2007, 15:08
He even has a goatee (sorta).
D: isn't the one with the goatee generically and by default the evil twin?
WHO TO SHOOT WHO TO SHOOT!!1!!!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 17 Sep 2007, 15:10
I'm hotter, and play a bitchin' guitar, so I get to live.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 17 Sep 2007, 15:59
Hurr cut
(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v121/77/17/5739266/n5739266_36005775_1246.jpg)
(figures that I get a hair cut the one day I havn't got my real camera)
Title: Re: i went to acl
Post by: bryanthelion on 17 Sep 2007, 16:38

(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1405/1399215550_d0a28105eb.jpg)
WOOOOOOOOOOO


nice nose hairs!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 17 Sep 2007, 16:53
Sorry about having four, but it's a full on story:

Is that an actual plush Tonberry? Because if so, awesome.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 17 Sep 2007, 16:55
I'm completely full of myself, so I get to live.

Fixed that. Here, a picture of me and my new goggles:

(http://a992.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/76/l_9b4299a064666ce884b0029ebcfc5737.jpg)

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 17 Sep 2007, 17:27
I'd hit it.



Also Sam you get cuter and cuter every day.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 17 Sep 2007, 18:13
Is that an actual plush Tonberry? Because if so, awesome.

Yup. My younger brother picked it up for me back in June when he took a trip to San Francisco. The thing is bitchin'.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 17 Sep 2007, 18:16
Hurr cut
(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v121/77/17/5739266/n5739266_36005775_1246.jpg)
(figures that I get a hair cut the one day I havn't got my real camera)

I.. uh.. er.. uhh... .

(That haircut works. Well.)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 17 Sep 2007, 18:30
(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v133/8/84/525827703/n525827703_286332_870.jpg)
Rutting couple next door doesn't know I'm hiding here under my safety blanket.
Hopefully they'll stop soon.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 17 Sep 2007, 18:31
Bang on the wall and tell then to shut the fuck up.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: onewheelwizzard on 17 Sep 2007, 18:35
(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v133/238/54/422548/n422548_34108788_8995.jpg)

NNNEWWWWRRRRRRMMMMM......NNNNNNNNEEWWWWWWRRRRRRMMM.....NNNEWWWWWWRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRRMMMMMMMM
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 17 Sep 2007, 19:40
Ebony Wilow, is that a Russian blue?

Umm he might be?  He is an RSPCA kitten, poor abandoned munchkin.  Are russian blues cranky little bastards?  He is!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 17 Sep 2007, 19:55
I had a Russian Blue a long time ago. His name was switched between Church and Diablo. We called him both, he responded to both. The we gave him to my grandpa. He called him Mr. Cat.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: backstagebetty on 17 Sep 2007, 20:08
Rockin' the iPod and ridiculous sweater at my desk at work.

(http://img4.glowfoto.com/images/2007/09/17-2028561347T.jpg)

And here's my pretty gray kitty.

(http://img4.glowfoto.com/images/2007/09/17-2035327118T.jpg)



P.S. Why do we all have gray kitties?

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 17 Sep 2007, 20:14
I feel so left out. I don't have a kitty.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 17 Sep 2007, 20:22
Oh Sam that kitty is so cute!
Not only do we all seem to have grey kitties, but all our grey kitties seem to look EXACTLY the same.
Sticking with the kitty theme, I love ebay.  I bought new things!
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0756.jpg)
Presents!
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0754.jpg)
Rediculously awesome kitty ear beanie (its too bad we just finished winter, now it's too hot to wear it)
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0751.jpg)
Awsomely awesome kitty necklace with dice which I totally love.
I look silly in beanies, but it means I have ears!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: clockworkjames on 17 Sep 2007, 21:12
Tifa kicks the facist tonberry!
(http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/232/animatedfinalcw7.gif)
Made aaages ago.

And I will do the same to whoever claims to look like/better than me.

DINK.

For the record when I moved out I forgot my tonberry so I did not have one to put on top of my computer, I went to the shop I got it from and bought another, came back and put it on the case before I powered it on. I always have one on my pc, or 2 atm even at LAN. They keep it safe.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 17 Sep 2007, 21:18
That is not a picture of you. At all.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 17 Sep 2007, 21:23
Yeah well, neither are all the bloody cats
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: clockworkjames on 17 Sep 2007, 21:26
Yeah well it was not fucking huge, it was 1 or 2 pics, chatter was not high but I was a creepy jerk. I just wanted to share my work.
(http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/6179/me2ef7.jpg)Longish hair and being a loli.
Since you OBVIOUSLY want more pictures of me.
I am killing facists on CS:S with 5.1 surroundsound headphones there.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: carnivoracious on 17 Sep 2007, 21:28
As promised, pictures!

I feel left out that I can't post kitty pictures as someone stole my kitty.
All my pictures also happen to be on the memory card I can't find.
So in the spirit of impending Halloween (not the movie) you get spiders!

(http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u264/carnivoracious/rosetta.jpg)
Rosetta (a long-jawed orb weaver)
(http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u264/carnivoracious/priscilla.jpg)
Priscilla (not sure what kind of spider she is but she only comes out at night)

Sorry the pics aren't great, but I had to use digital zoom as I did not want to scare them away by getting closer.
*P.S.* They may or may not devour fascists...

*edit* I think the pictures work now.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: made from ribs on 17 Sep 2007, 22:12
i couldnt find my cats.
so i made a manatee out of an old zucchini, some snap peas and two tooth picks.
(http://i13.tinypic.com/5yu0mmw.png)

(http://i2.tinypic.com/5zo09ol.png)

I'm like McGyver.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 17 Sep 2007, 22:25
My Hanners shirt arrived :D

(http://img396.imageshack.us/img396/7086/004kd0.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 17 Sep 2007, 22:34
I would like to praise Jeph's foresight in designing this so that the text sits just so across ladies' boobs.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 17 Sep 2007, 22:47
"STOP STARING AT MY TITS!"

"I'm only reading your shirt."

"Oh. *stick out chest for easy reading*"
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: onewheelwizzard on 18 Sep 2007, 00:23
i couldnt find my cats.
so i made a manatee out of an old zucchini, some snap peas and two tooth picks.
I'm like McGyver.

I hope I'm not the only person who noticed this bit of genius.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: The extra letter on 18 Sep 2007, 03:40
Ebony Wilow, is that a Russian blue?

Umm he might be?  He is an RSPCA kitten, poor abandoned munchkin.  Are russian blues cranky little bastards?  He is!
Hehe, that sounds like mine. She'll attack you if you walk past the stairs and don't give her immediate attention and pats. She's kinda psychotic.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Gemmwah on 18 Sep 2007, 05:23
Princy, that shirt looks awesome.

(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v113/69/35/286000311/n286000311_606135_7008.jpg)

Anti-Gravity girl. Chillaxing on the wall. The floor's in the bottom left corner
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 18 Sep 2007, 07:33
so i made a manatee out of an old zucchini, some snap peas and two tooth picks.

You are now my favourite new forumite.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 18 Sep 2007, 07:44
i couldnt find my cats.
so i made a manatee out of an old zucchini, some snap peas and two tooth picks.
(http://i13.tinypic.com/5yu0mmw.png)

(http://i2.tinypic.com/5zo09ol.png)

I'm like McGyver.

Prove to me that you are a real girl.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 18 Sep 2007, 08:34
TITS OR GTFO
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: supertankguy on 18 Sep 2007, 12:01
vegetable manatee is awesome enough that I wish I had come up with the idea
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 18 Sep 2007, 12:14
TITS OR GTFO

I just think she's a gimmick.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 18 Sep 2007, 12:48
A couple more posts and she'll be trying to sell us all [email protected]@L C1AL1S1S!!!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: sandysmilinstrange on 18 Sep 2007, 13:33
I know I posted it on aurostion, but I like this picture

VENUS FRYTRAP
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v37/ceeingred/100_0006.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 18 Sep 2007, 13:35
Bang on the wall and tell then to shut the fuck up.

(http://www.freeimagehost.ro/thumbs/WRONG!.jpg) (http://www.freeimagehost.ro/viewer.php?file=WRONG!.jpg)

(http://imgs.xkcd.com/comics/loud_sex.png) (http://xkcd.com/316/)


Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 18 Sep 2007, 14:57
Wait.
Where would I even find a loud girlfriend.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 18 Sep 2007, 16:18
I will fix this problem.

(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1203/1403751669_bb095af247.jpg?v=0)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 18 Sep 2007, 20:28
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/me/muffffffin.jpg)
MUFFINS
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 18 Sep 2007, 20:30
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/P9180007.jpg)
SPAGHETTI!

OMNOMNOMNOM
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Kai on 18 Sep 2007, 20:58
(http://i69.photobucket.com/albums/i47/TheLovableCynic/sofreakingcool.jpg)


TAPE MEASURERS


GOBBLE GOBBLE
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: carnivoracious on 18 Sep 2007, 21:02
What is the girl behind you doing (the one with the belt around her shirt)?

More pics (of me this time) soon...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: made from ribs on 18 Sep 2007, 21:29
oh, ye of little faith.
here's proof for those nonbelievers in the amazingness that is me.
(http://i7.tinypic.com/4lj5bon.png)
oh look. is that YOUR POSTS directly behind my head!? i do believe so!
(http://i14.tinypic.com/4mjzewl.png) see the bracelets? wet hair? unsightly acne? acne is the GIMMICK of gimmicks.
(http://i6.tinypic.com/66a9kxi.png) oh the bracelets again! pointing to your posts and my pictures whilst writing this!

i meant to do this sooner, unfortunately life happened and instead i made a sandwich and painted my closet.
then i meant to do it again, but took a shower. and made myself dinner. and fed my cats.
anyway, heres your proof.  :-D
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: philharmonic on 18 Sep 2007, 22:46
Are y'all still bashing fascists? How 'bout cookies? I'm thinking cookies are more a communist thing. (share and share alike)

(http://members.shaw.ca/ve7qsa/dough.jpg)
This is what remains after making one dozen cookies.

(http://members.shaw.ca/ve7qsa/intheoven.jpg)
There they go. Into the oven.

(http://members.shaw.ca/ve7qsa/theydone.jpg)
After twenty minutes. "And there you go."
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 18 Sep 2007, 23:16
Clean your oven
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 18 Sep 2007, 23:23
IT IS THAT TIME AGAIN


(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/19ohnine2006/DSCF0038.jpg)


ARRRE YE READY


(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/19ohnine2006/DSCF0046.jpg)


KEELHAULIN'


(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/19ohnine2006/DSCF0034.jpg)


BITCHES WENCHES


(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/19ohnine2006/DSCF0033.jpg)



Edit: So much booze went into this post. Also I am sorry for last year's pics. I will take some later after I have done a bit of sleeping looting and wenching.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: made from ribs on 18 Sep 2007, 23:32
Clean your oven

yeah seriously, it's like SAW 4 in that thing.

"i've hidden the shortening in your eye socket. you have ten minutes to take this wooden spoon, gouge out your eye, and mix the shortening into the cookies before the batter goes bad. did i mention i broke your arms in four places and padlocked spike clad bowling balls on top of your hands? because i did. good luck!"
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 18 Sep 2007, 23:34
SPAGHETTI!
OMNOMNOMNOM

Because of this forum I now walk around my house and suddenly yell OMNOMNOMNOM and giggle.
Luckily my boyfriend hasn't caught m doing that yet.  It seems like an embarrassing thing to be caught doing.

I just finished work!  Look at my pretty blue shirt!
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0758.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Johnny C on 18 Sep 2007, 23:47
oh, ye of little faith.

It's simply that we've been burned before, Miss. Incidentally, your choice of companion animal is fantastic.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ocarina654 on 19 Sep 2007, 00:09
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y96/ocarina654/flargh.jpg)
My default position.

(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y96/ocarina654/facehair.jpg)
A little face in my hair.

Most of that hair is going away soon.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: made from ribs on 19 Sep 2007, 00:12

It's simply that we've been burned before, Miss. Incidentally, your choice of companion animal is fantastic.
( second time i have to quote! argh.)

s'alright.
we all know what happens when people assume  :wink:

..using that statement just killed about 15 of my braincells.

anyway, im not out to "burn" anyone.
or cause forum drama.
cuz forum drama is what causes wrinkles in todays youthfully society, and possibly leads to spontaneous combustion :D
hoorah! happy times!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Neuvost on 19 Sep 2007, 00:32
PIKACHU GO!!!! ...kill some fascists!
I really liked this picture.

grls on teh qc forems?! nvr!!!!1
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Elizzybeth on 19 Sep 2007, 00:36
cookies?

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v321/NvrTooMuchPython/Photo65.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: anditsdiscontents on 19 Sep 2007, 07:36
just found the sleaziest/best pic of me ever on facebook:
(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v112/243/86/590220495/n590220495_317270_7217.jpg)
plus i'm holding a longneck. noice. different. unyuuusual.


and here's me on the back steps with my housemate's awesome little dog, Daizy.
(http://photos-495.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v77/243/86/590220495/n590220495_173616_859.jpg)



Daisy got run over by a car a few weeks after this was taken  :-(
very sad.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 19 Sep 2007, 10:06
I suppose I should put my hideous pic up ;)

(http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/3750/losface3iy0.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 19 Sep 2007, 11:29
anditsdiscontents, I tried very hard to find a picture of a young John Cusack in sunglasses from Better Off Dead, but I was unable to.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 19 Sep 2007, 12:51
Matt, I kept thinking of a young Mike Myers.  I couldn't find a decent picture of Nancy Travis from So I Married An Axe Murder to 'shop in though.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Kai on 19 Sep 2007, 17:58
What is the girl behind you doing (the one with the belt around her shirt)


probably removing gels from a light

this is in a theater, understand
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Joseph on 19 Sep 2007, 18:08
This is the "band" I was briefly in this summer.  We performed one song only once, which happened to be a cover of Animal Collective's "We Tigers."  The room we were in was almost completely dark, with only a few candles for light, but the flash on the camera ruins that.

(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v117/171/68/502702842/n502702842_108928_1487.jpg)

(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v117/171/68/502702842/n502702842_108924_351.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 19 Sep 2007, 18:13
A good fantasy pirate will always have the perfect seasonal accessories.

(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/19ohnine2007/DSCF0024.jpg)


and also a fucking kickass corset.

(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/19ohnine2007/DSCF0054.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 19 Sep 2007, 19:05
Drool.

And in keeping with the whole picture thing...

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b131/sutekitatakai/IMG_3282.jpg)

Me looking pretentious on the steps of my beach house.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 19 Sep 2007, 19:21
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0765.jpg)

OMNOMNOMNOM  Pink tim tams, helping cure breast cancer one delicious snack at a time.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 19 Sep 2007, 21:37
In my head, tim tams sound like a slang term for breasts, so it make sense.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 3Z3VH on 19 Sep 2007, 21:38
I would buy them by the CASE !
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ernest on 19 Sep 2007, 21:42
This is how I look, you guys

there are no disclaimers

this is what you get

like it or not
(http://i136.photobucket.com/albums/q171/elobue1/fans014.jpg)

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 19 Sep 2007, 21:59
A good fantasy pirate will always have the perfect seasonal accessories.

(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/19ohnine2007/DSCF0024.jpg)


Thats a Legacy Forge (Starfire) dagger is it not?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 19 Sep 2007, 22:01
No.



Dirk. So yes. Except it has a bit of an edge now, because I have mad patience.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 19 Sep 2007, 22:06
Right, dirk. Anyways its nice, but that voids the warrenty from Legacy. :(

I really like the small blades from Legacy.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 19 Sep 2007, 22:10
Who needs a warranty? Their shit is top-notch. I am fully confident it's got pretty much perfect composition as a blade, and I won't be using it for combat or whatever insofar as I know, and well, I am aware the warranty was voided so I guess if anything happens I knew better.


I, too, adore their small blades.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 19 Sep 2007, 22:15
Well the warrenty is less for combat (you dont wanna hit edge to edge anyways), more for people who attack cars, so I can see your point. I have destroyed many a furniture 'monster' with my Legacy Axe. Fun times.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 19 Sep 2007, 22:18
KITCHEN PIKSHUR

(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1194/1410563014_4ea51b210e.jpg)

(Katie you look smashing xxx)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 19 Sep 2007, 23:19
Guys I think Lunchy is too pretty to be as good at taking pictures as she is; the two combined sort of blow my fuses.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 3Z3VH on 20 Sep 2007, 00:47
Her kitchen is too clean, it screams "psycho."
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 20 Sep 2007, 04:03
Australian Psycho (Summer '08).
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 20 Sep 2007, 07:37
KITCHEN PIKSHUR

(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1194/1410563014_4ea51b210e.jpg)

(Katie you look smashing xxx)


(http://mysticmuse.net/images/gallerypics7/elizabeth-anne-allen-misc-photos-11.jpg)

?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 20 Sep 2007, 07:52
Her kitchen is too clean, it screams "psycho."

lunchbawks == hannelore

???
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: carnivoracious on 21 Sep 2007, 11:43
(http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u264/carnivoracious/yorickcellphone.jpg)
Alas, poor Yorick, I knew him we- wait a minute this is a cell phone.  I'm supposed to have a skull.  Props mistress...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 21 Sep 2007, 12:37
OM NOM NOM (etc.)


SALAD


(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/Mosag/Foto100.jpg)

SALAD GIVES PRETTY EYES


(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/Mosag/Foto99.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 21 Sep 2007, 14:15
Those eyes are only slightly pretty.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 21 Sep 2007, 15:01
I would need a better picture to make an informed decision.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: David_Dovey on 21 Sep 2007, 19:12
wow lummer you really like yourself don't you
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: onewheelwizzard on 21 Sep 2007, 19:22
I can't tell if David_Dovey is making a comment about Lummer's post directly, or about Kieffer and Misconception's replies.  I think my irony radar might need a rest.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Yogurt on 21 Sep 2007, 19:41
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b208/Painful_regrets/Abstract_Krista_by_Darkforest16.jpg)

This is my best friend. His name is Pablo, and I made him out of popcorn left overs.
Don't laugh! I bet he's tastier than your best friend!

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Yogurt on 21 Sep 2007, 19:45
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b208/Painful_regrets/NEWhair.jpg)

I think I'm trying to practice hypnosis through my eyes.
Now, look deep, deep into my needlessly wide eyeballs.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Yogurt on 21 Sep 2007, 19:47
On second thought....I just look like I'm confused, or a pedophile.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ZJGent on 21 Sep 2007, 19:48
Triple posting is baaaaad.
See what you did? You went and turned a respected (har har) forum member into an androgynous talking sheep. By triple posting. That's what triple posting does.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 21 Sep 2007, 20:21
I think Lummer has prettier lips than eyes.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 21 Sep 2007, 20:57
This is how you show off eyes:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v207/Something_Witty/100_3630.png)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 21 Sep 2007, 21:20
dang, you have nicely articulated stroma
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 21 Sep 2007, 21:21
I think Lummer has prettier lips than eyes.
This might be true, barring a better picture. Take a cue from Something Witty- get right up close there!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 21 Sep 2007, 21:27
That's actually a crop from a full head+shoulders shot(that I have since lost), I was using one fucking hell of a professional grade digital camera at the time.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 21 Sep 2007, 21:29
Didn't we do this one time? Or was that somewhere else?


(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/DSCF0001-2.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 21 Sep 2007, 21:35
I think we've done it both places, I was just showing how to do it right.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 22 Sep 2007, 00:55
Witty, that is not how you do eyes right. That is how you do eyes scary. That is way too close and it looks like your eyelashes are the limbs of a spider-eye-beast from my nightmares that is going to eat everyone after climbing out of their computer screens.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 22 Sep 2007, 02:29
wow lummer you really like yourself don't you

Yes. Most likely a little too much. It takes an awful lot of restraint for me to not post in this thread every five minutes  :|
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Rizzo on 22 Sep 2007, 05:15
This is my dresser. It's covered in junk.

(http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b18/Cthulucore/Mirror.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 22 Sep 2007, 05:17
Is that a tiny guitar?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 22 Sep 2007, 07:33
What the fresh hell is going on in this thread?

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/jimmy5times/DSCF0022.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 22 Sep 2007, 07:56
I'm goin' zombie huntin'. Someone's gotta save us all.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/P9220003.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 22 Sep 2007, 08:26
Seriously, you win at life.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: TheBoredOne on 22 Sep 2007, 11:26
Just don't hunt the things from "Feast". Heroes don't fare well against them.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 22 Sep 2007, 11:52
That is how you do eyes scary.

Like I said.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Chrasstor on 22 Sep 2007, 13:23
(http://img249.imageshack.us/img249/7196/numba4pm5.jpg)
(http://img227.imageshack.us/img227/9168/pic4ishqh0.jpg)

I look 12ish, but I'm actually going to be 16 in 3 months, ha...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: sandysmilinstrange on 22 Sep 2007, 13:53
At my age, twelve and sixteen are basically the same, so don't worry too much about it.

Obsessions, that is a pretty badass picture. Nicely done.

(http://i49.photobucket.com/albums/f269/katherynlynn/100_2732.jpg)
I was told by a youth that my tank top was skanky. Am I showing too much arm?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 22 Sep 2007, 15:46
No, punch that youth.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pilsner on 22 Sep 2007, 16:07
I was told by a youth that my tank top was skanky. Am I showing too much arm?

No.  Don't take fashion advice from Mormons or Shakers. 

Also:
[img width= height=]http://media.canada.com/a373a9c0-95d4-4a46-a780-e930d6c76147/070510-feist.jpg[/img]

Huh.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 22 Sep 2007, 16:35
I assure you that Casey is far prettier than Feist.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 22 Sep 2007, 19:01
i cut myself a mohawk!

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v321/coolcathay/Photo102.jpg)

better picture to come later.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 22 Sep 2007, 20:05
Oh man, Ruyi. Oh man.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: godinpants on 22 Sep 2007, 21:11
Is that a tiny guitar?

Perhaps we are just in the presence of a giant?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Chrasstor on 22 Sep 2007, 21:14
Giants can't use cameras. Everyone knows that.

(http://img530.imageshack.us/img530/8915/picture037cq3.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 22 Sep 2007, 21:16
I'm goin' zombie huntin'. Someone's gotta save us all.

Dude, you're cool and all, I like what you post, but you're woefully mistaken if you think a wooden bat and a claw hammer are adequate enough to save the world from zombies.

I was told by a youth that my tank top was skanky. Am I showing too much arm?

No, Casey, not at all. /suggestive wink
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Boro_Bandito on 22 Sep 2007, 22:05
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y110/Wildkyn/CigarSmokinsonuvabitch_0001.jpg)

Oh, I don't know about that, seems like whatever's at hand when they come is what you got, so you'd better be able to make use of whatever it is you've got.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 22 Sep 2007, 22:27
two (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v321/coolcathay/Photo115.jpg) more (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v321/coolcathay/Photo108.jpg), after a dude i met styled it. i think i prefer it without the gunk though!

i am aware it is kind of a silly thing to do, but i've been wanting a mohawk for a while, and there is pretty much no other time in my life when i could do it! so i am happy.

next plan: shaving a small heart on the side, maybe behind my ear.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: David_Dovey on 22 Sep 2007, 22:37
Super Excellent ruyi.

BOOZE-A-CINO: AN EPIC TALE IN 10 PARTS

(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a55/ddovey/IMG_0457.jpg)
(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a55/ddovey/IMG_0459.jpg)
(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a55/ddovey/IMG_0462.jpg)
(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a55/ddovey/IMG_0463.jpg)
(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a55/ddovey/IMG_0464.jpg)
(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a55/ddovey/IMG_0465.jpg)
(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a55/ddovey/IMG_0466.jpg)
(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a55/ddovey/IMG_0467.jpg)
(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a55/ddovey/IMG_0468.jpg)
(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a55/ddovey/scene-missing.gif)
(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a55/ddovey/Image058.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Boro_Bandito on 22 Sep 2007, 22:39
is the broken picture intended? Because that's awesome if it is.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pilsner on 22 Sep 2007, 23:37
What would be awesome is if broken links came up with classic "Scene Missing" placards.  That would be what would happen if Tarantino controlled the internet.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 22 Sep 2007, 23:39
Man I cannot even begin to imagine how much scarier the Internet would be if we took its already twisted nature and added Tarantino to the mix.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 23 Sep 2007, 00:57
My little sister who is...6..figured out how to set the hose to jet. And she sprayed me. I had been misting her, so she got me back. I hate smart kids.

(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/FSCN7179.jpg)

Chrasstor,
(Dude...I'm older than you by 3 months...)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 23 Sep 2007, 01:13
I was feeling a bit like a camwhore this evening.  Plus, I like this shirt. 

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b131/sutekitatakai/MyPicture-10.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Rizzo on 23 Sep 2007, 01:31
Is that a tiny guitar?
And a tiny Easter Island statue and a snowglobe.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 23 Sep 2007, 01:52
two (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v321/coolcathay/Photo115.jpg) more (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v321/coolcathay/Photo108.jpg), after a dude i met styled it. i think i prefer it without the gunk though!

i am aware it is kind of a silly thing to do, but i've been wanting a mohawk for a while, and there is pretty much no other time in my life when i could do it! so i am happy.

next plan: shaving a small heart on the side, maybe behind my ear.

Some of the guys at my school have cool designs shaved into their hair (the whole varsity football team got mohawks) . One kid has some awesome swirls, and another has a cool angular design. I heart would look so cool! I love your new hair :)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 23 Sep 2007, 06:15
Ruyi that is totally awesome.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Gemmwah on 23 Sep 2007, 09:26
Ruyi, your hair looks fantastic. I want to find the guts to do that again.

(http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y172/FrozenLily/IMAG0002-3.jpg)

KIDS.

Say no to cigarettes.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 23 Sep 2007, 10:02
Angry music....

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y282/Zachyon/Underbidofdoom.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 23 Sep 2007, 10:49
I don't know what that is but it seems to be working on the guy behind you.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 23 Sep 2007, 11:11
Oh come on, who can honestly say that their eye isn't immediately drawn to that sweet ass.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 23 Sep 2007, 11:15
I certainly can't.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: TheFuriousWombat on 23 Sep 2007, 11:26
They screened 300 at the campus movie theater. We went decked out (with custom designed shirts no less). Beforehand, we killed each other. It was pretty fucking awesome.

(http://photos-062.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sctm/v126/116/25/1381410062/n1381410062_30050269_6654.jpg)

(http://photos-062.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sctm/v126/116/25/1381410062/n1381410062_30050284_669.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 23 Sep 2007, 11:52
We did 300 as well!
(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v128/77/17/5739266/n5739266_36059304_457.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 23 Sep 2007, 11:59
That night did you have slow motion sex under a strobe light?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 23 Sep 2007, 17:01
Does he really have an American Flag tattoo on his chest?


Also, hella mad sick of 300.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 23 Sep 2007, 17:10
i cut myself a mohawk!

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v321/coolcathay/Photo102.jpg)

better picture to come later.


Ruyi.

Ruyi.

Ruyi, Ruyi, Ruyi Ruyi.

How old are you again? And how much do you love jesus? I really need to know this because I really can not come up with a better way to explain just how good you now look.

You look, so good. You have gone from "I have long hair" to "Cute, slightly intimidating asian hipster girl who would probably be more likely to mock me than actually talk to me."

It is a good look. Now you should do some serious righteous bleaching and dying and maybe a little razoring t just make that the best haircut possible.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 23 Sep 2007, 18:18
Does he really have an American Flag tattoo on his chest?


Also, hella mad sick of 300.
No, he really doesn't. He has a half US-half German flag tattoo on his chest. His mother was from Germany and died 4 years ago while they were living there.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 23 Sep 2007, 18:27
I never even saw 300.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 23 Sep 2007, 19:09
I've never seen 300 either.


Anyway, here is a larger version of my avatar.

(http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q228/andlemonade/P3170361.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: clockworkjames on 23 Sep 2007, 20:03
(http://img338.imageshack.us/img338/6079/pippin2yt4.jpg)

hurrrrr hurrrr

ama pirate...

(http://img178.imageshack.us/img178/6286/pirateaq9.jpg)

I hate that pic, is embarrasing.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 23 Sep 2007, 20:18
Why then are you putting it on the internet, where everyone can see it??
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 23 Sep 2007, 20:21
I second that question.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 23 Sep 2007, 20:25
I like the embarrassing picture.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: clockworkjames on 23 Sep 2007, 21:24
Thought someone might get a giggle.
Not a cam whore, just wanna post a response without getting complained at.
(http://img230.imageshack.us/img230/4241/ballkf2.jpg)
I am the one in the tux.
Also quite embarrasing but damn, I has sideburns there too. I was like... sixteen.
My date was a facist and I destroyed her.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 23 Sep 2007, 21:27
We'll let it slide this time.

Also, you should have joined the other two in the wearing of kilts, because kilts are fantastic.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 23 Sep 2007, 21:30
Cue Vergy's kilt pic in 3.. 2... 1....
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 23 Sep 2007, 21:32
Yes, please.

Or maybe we should just ask for a larger version of his new avatar.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 23 Sep 2007, 21:58

My date was a facist and I destroyed her.


There are so many ways to turn this into a dirty joke.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 23 Sep 2007, 22:03
I certainly overran her Maginot Line...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Choco on 23 Sep 2007, 22:10
Here's a picture of  one of my best friends, my girlfriend, and I at a free outdoor concert on Thursday.

(http://i17.photobucket.com/albums/b92/soulonfirexx/HPIM5361.jpg)

There were lots of kids from high school running around with their parents. We felt a little out of place.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 23 Sep 2007, 22:15
My date was a facist and I destroyed her vagina
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 23 Sep 2007, 22:16
My date was a facist and I had stuck my penis into her vagina
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 23 Sep 2007, 22:17
My date was a facist and I had stuck my abnormally large penis in her vagina, stretching it to a size greater than a normal man could satisfy, thus destroying her in terms of future male sexual pleasure.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: clockworkjames on 23 Sep 2007, 23:27
Trust me man, it ain't abnormally large.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mooface on 24 Sep 2007, 05:00
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1409/1432073471_bc0d61a099.jpg?v=0)

after a stressful 3 days of moving into the new apartment, i took a break and colored in a few pages of my Unicorn Coloring Book.

(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1009/1432948098_ee2d382ad1.jpg?v=0)

my puppy (who is very confused as to why my roommates and all our things are in a new place) decided to take a nap.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Verergoca on 24 Sep 2007, 05:59
EEEEEEEEE

*pets Mr. Flufflball McFluffles*
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 24 Sep 2007, 06:15
(People posted, but this was to Inlander's response.) Srsly. And I think red's bf looks more like James McAvoy than Pippin.

Mai, that is a sweet coloring book. Every coloring book should have unicorns. Mmmhmm.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mooface on 24 Sep 2007, 06:20
he is not so very mcfluffly anymore, unfortunately :(

(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1062/1433247988_12e1a717e6.jpg?v=0)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 24 Sep 2007, 07:26
You have a thing for unicorns, it seems.

Perhaps 'cause they're so horny.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SusurrusIgnoramus on 24 Sep 2007, 07:41
trust me man, it ain't abnormally large.

also, i really like this new picture of me with my girlfriend...

(http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v128/122/75/43700062/n43700062_30558069_4055.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 24 Sep 2007, 08:20
(People posted, but this was to Inlander's response.) Srsly. And I think red's bf looks more like James McAvoy than Pippin.
I didn't know who James McAvoy was before, but a GIS makes me agree with you, at least about the face. Now Mr. McAvoy just needs giant curly hair and to get a little more built!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: sandysmilinstrange on 24 Sep 2007, 10:53
Hooping practice
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v37/ceeingred/100_0020.jpg)
I wish I'd captured it when I was halfway through bringing it over my head. That makes more sense of the awkward way I'm standing.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: normz on 24 Sep 2007, 10:55
ok im back and i wish i got to wear hats/fascinators out in public more often

(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y94/normz/wooparty005.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 24 Sep 2007, 11:32
I certainly overran her Maginot Line...

That one only works in this context if he's the fascist.  "I'll push through to her Siegfried Line" would work better.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Misereatur on 24 Sep 2007, 11:51
I never even saw 300.

Keep up the good work.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 24 Sep 2007, 13:03
sandy, i think that's a perfect moment.

my new avatar:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v321/coolcathay/MyPicture.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 24 Sep 2007, 14:15
The number of pretty people on this board never ceases to amaze me. But maybe it's because they relate to the humor the most.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: carnivoracious on 24 Sep 2007, 20:21
(http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u264/carnivoracious/myfakeasstattoo.jpg)

I agree, the concentration of sexy seems unnatural.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 24 Sep 2007, 20:40
I swear we should actually go through with Darryl's "what would it look like if QCers bred?" experiment. This may or may not be directly related to the fact that I'd like to make out with everybody here.

EVERYBODY.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 24 Sep 2007, 20:41
Yes.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 24 Sep 2007, 21:15
The number of pretty people on this board never ceases to amaze me. But maybe it's because they relate to the humor the most.

It's true, ugly people can't laugh.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ohnoitseric on 24 Sep 2007, 21:28
My life would be complete if I could have a beard like Inlander's
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 24 Sep 2007, 21:30
His name isn't HARRY for nothin'!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 24 Sep 2007, 22:11
It's true, ugly people can't laugh.

I can laugh just fine...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: clockworkjames on 24 Sep 2007, 23:12
The number of pretty people on this board never ceases to amaze me. But maybe it's because they relate to the humor the most.
Perhaps selective breeding could make a race of super pretty people with awesome senses of humour...

Or inbreeding leading to retardation. I dunno.

Let's not try that.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 24 Sep 2007, 23:48
ok im back and i wish i got to wear hats/fascinators out in public more often

(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y94/normz/wooparty005.jpg)


TITTAYS!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 25 Sep 2007, 00:18
I believe in polite society they're known as "NormzNorks".
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Napoleon the Clown on 25 Sep 2007, 01:21
Why then are you putting it [an embarrassing pic you hate] on the internet, where everyone can see it??
My guess is he's fishing for compliments.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: clockworkjames on 25 Sep 2007, 08:39
Why then are you putting it [an embarrassing pic you hate] on the internet, where everyone can see it??
My guess is he's fishing for compliments.

Heh, if only. Just it made my friend lisa laugh ALOT and even if it is at my expense I like to amuse people, that picture is my bane.
If I was fishing for compliments I would post a naked pic.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Boro_Bandito on 25 Sep 2007, 08:51
We're waiting.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Joey JoJo on 25 Sep 2007, 09:13
(http://a578.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/75/l_5259c85c6fd5a7b2182ff47078e2c619.jpg)

Me at Pride. Good times.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 25 Sep 2007, 09:32
Why Jesus, what sporty sunglasses you have!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 25 Sep 2007, 09:33
Far too pale skinned, wrong nose.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 25 Sep 2007, 09:36
Girl in the yellow outfit behind Jesus,
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 25 Sep 2007, 09:43
Rookie mistake: Until you have seen their face, you cannot tell if a person is attractive. I can't tell you how many times I've been walking behind someone and thought they were attractive right up until they look to the side or something and I glimpse their face.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 25 Sep 2007, 09:45
But she is so shiny.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 25 Sep 2007, 12:36
(http://a578.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/75/l_5259c85c6fd5a7b2182ff47078e2c619.jpg)

Me at Pride.

gaaaaay
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: supertankguy on 25 Sep 2007, 12:54
If I was fishing for compliments I would post a naked pic.

You wouldn't catch many keepers with such a small worm.

Oh snap!

Sorry, setups like that one don't come along often.

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 25 Sep 2007, 13:43
They do when tommy posts plenty.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Boro_Bandito on 25 Sep 2007, 13:52
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y110/Wildkyn/PhilipsQCpictures005.jpg)

LESS YAPPY MORE SNAPPY
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 25 Sep 2007, 14:52
Rookie mistake: Until you have seen their face, you cannot tell if a person is attractive. I can't tell you how many times I've been walking behind someone and thought they were attractive right up until they look to the side or something and I glimpse their face.

"Good from far, far from good."
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 25 Sep 2007, 16:36
Me looking not like me (aka hot):
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Skibas_clavicle/purple1.jpg)

AND...me looking like me (aka goofy and slightly awkward):
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Skibas_clavicle/purple2.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 25 Sep 2007, 16:52
You look very nice in both of the pictures.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 25 Sep 2007, 16:56
WOAH!

SLOW DOWN ON THE RACEY COMMENTS THERE, NIGEL.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 25 Sep 2007, 16:57
Yeah, fuckin' pervert.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 25 Sep 2007, 17:13
:/
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 25 Sep 2007, 18:20
Heh. I think she's fishing for compliments, myself.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: notselfcreated on 25 Sep 2007, 18:30
I come out of lurking, to post THIS.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v484/godefridus/jeff0925071.jpg)

Also, in the spirit of OM NOM NOM

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v484/godefridus/jeff0925072.jpg)

Also, Sandy is my favorite.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 25 Sep 2007, 20:46
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0768.jpg)
OMNOMNOMNOM

This is me and my lunch!  mmm cherry yoghurt with fresh strawberrys.  then I ruined the healthy with pringles..yay!

I'm teaching my kitty that its time for his dinner when I say OMNOMNOMNOM.  He almost has it.  it's awesome.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: made from ribs on 25 Sep 2007, 21:04
introducing: frozen chicken frisbey with john kerry!
"CATCH IT JOHN KERRY!"
(http://a151.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/96/l_ef5a22004f9ff070d78627bd0e689dbe.png)
FAIL.

(no john kerrys were hurt in the making of this picture, though i cant say much for the chicken.)

PS: unintentional kitty grope!
(http://i23.tinypic.com/4hsbag)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 25 Sep 2007, 21:06
That was not unintentional.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: made from ribs on 25 Sep 2007, 21:08
it was too!
he was trying to get at the camera.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 25 Sep 2007, 21:28
*snip*

You are awesome.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 25 Sep 2007, 22:27
This is what I looked like at school today. I had black short shorts on too, I figured I needed some colour.
(http://img218.imageshack.us/img218/263/p9260040qb6.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 25 Sep 2007, 23:38
pikshurs

Your hair is an awesome color.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Verergoca on 26 Sep 2007, 00:37
(http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d79/Verergoca/Photos/Me/S5001612.jpg)

Guess who had a haircut?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 26 Sep 2007, 00:54
Give me 10 minutes, people. 10 minutes until your salvation from "I don't actually know what this 'KimJongSick' asshole looks like" syndrome.

EDIT: Okay I'm just going to make these stupid things into URLs so you don't have to endure the whole "OH GOD IT'S HUEG" thing.

Here you see me with an awesome shirt:
http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/7159/img2448ig7.jpg (http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/7159/img2448ig7.jpg)

And here you see my new guitar with my beloved amp (sorry, I can't take a photo of myself playing, as I'm still figuring this bloody camera out):
http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/6789/img2444dj5.jpg (http://img257.imageshack.us/img257/6789/img2444dj5.jpg)

MOCK MY DORKINESS NOW, MISTER JOE HOCKING! MUAHAHAhahah--oh hell who am I kidding.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: sandysmilinstrange on 26 Sep 2007, 06:27
Also, Sandy is my favorite.

Huzzah!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 26 Sep 2007, 07:06
She was asking for it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 26 Sep 2007, 07:07
Give me 10 minutes, people. 10 minutes until your salvation from "I don't actually know what this 'KimJongSick' asshole looks like" syndrome.

You know, at first I read that as

Quote
Give me 10 minutes, people. 10 minutes until your salvation from "I don't actually know what KimJongSick's asshole looks like" syndrome.

And, in short, I was afraid  :-o
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mooface on 26 Sep 2007, 07:11
Julia:  HOW THE FUCK DO YOU GET YOUR HAIR THAT COLOR?  the most my hair does when i try and make it purple is become a sorry shade of magenta.  anyways, your hair looks great (as usual) and shut up you always look hot.

and since this is the photo thread...

(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1405/1442360949_85f33797a0.jpg?v=0)
this it an awesomely classy painting that was on the wall of our new apartment.  we decided to keep it up because it is so sexy.

(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1143/1442360745_10f7241f1f.jpg?v=0)
you don't have to wonder about what the rest of my face looks like because my nose is about the same size as Odds Bodkins' anyways.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: sandysmilinstrange on 26 Sep 2007, 07:41
Mooface has amazing eyes. This is simply stating facts.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 2.0 on 26 Sep 2007, 08:32
Does  just about everybody on the foroum wear glasses or what
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: negative creep on 26 Sep 2007, 09:24
Yes.

Also: New haircut! (I apologize for the inferior quality of the pictures, but my webcam is the only option for me to take pictures at all, at the moment)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v225/todesfuesch/nwhrct1.jpg)
This is from the left, it's quite short there. What you can see here (at least where it's short) is my natural haircolour. I may or may not re-dye it.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v225/todesfuesch/nwhrct2.jpg)
From the right. It's pretty long here, still purple (unlike in the back). Also note that the fringe is cut that way, not combed to the right.

I'm quite happy with that, but I might change it a bit over the next weeks, I'll have to see how it looks as soon as it's grown out a little and/or re-dyed.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Bibliophile on 26 Sep 2007, 09:57
Wait, wait! Is it too late to post a jesus picture?

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b110/Gypselle/1280248759_7202e1c3c0.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 26 Sep 2007, 10:08
Glasses are awesome. Actually, I have to get new ones because I can't see anymore. I has an appointment on Friday.

This picture's a couple years old, but I still have the same glasses.... I love them and don't really want to get new ones *pouts*

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v249/dramajuana/Just%20Me/069b10ac.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 26 Sep 2007, 10:13
Does  just about everybody on the foroum wear glasses or what


I have good vision! Glasses free, and the only one in my immediate family to not have any vision deficiencies!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LiterSize on 26 Sep 2007, 10:50
I see things:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/Xtract/random/nasprotect.jpg)



and makeouts!


(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/Xtract/random/pda01.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 26 Sep 2007, 11:18
Does  just about everybody on the foroum wear glasses or what
Nope. 20/20 vision uncorrected here.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 26 Sep 2007, 11:49
I'm sitting on 20/18 eyes. I am one fifth of a person better than the rest of you 'perfect' suckers.

P.S. Uh, I would maybe delete this if I could.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Chrasstor on 26 Sep 2007, 12:03
(http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/9436/picture063jq3.jpg)

20/20 BIZNATJIZZ!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 26 Sep 2007, 12:06
Do those earbuds ever leave your ears?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Chrasstor on 26 Sep 2007, 12:07
I was going to comment on that, but I forgot. No, I have shitty speakers... So pretty much any time that I'm just relaxing, I relax with my earbuds!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 26 Sep 2007, 12:32
He's under Cyber-control :P
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 26 Sep 2007, 12:36
Bugger
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ummmkay on 26 Sep 2007, 14:57
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v651/i_so_rule/laser.jpg)

WOOOOOOO MAKIN' SOME LEMONADE.

Also my vision is 20/800 on a good day, according to my eye doctor. I'm not sure what the actual number is, because he wouldn't tell me. I think he thought it was going to make me depressed or something.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Johnny C on 26 Sep 2007, 15:03
HOLY SHIT
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 26 Sep 2007, 15:07
You might want to get some Ruby Quartz glasses there.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: big hair sam on 26 Sep 2007, 15:35
(http://img264.imageshack.us/img264/8262/leeeadd0c68ebbd1717ab4fgw1.th.jpg) (http://img264.imageshack.us/my.php?image=leeeadd0c68ebbd1717ab4fgw1.jpg)

Me and my lady friend :-D
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ummmkay on 26 Sep 2007, 15:47
You might want to get some Ruby Quartz glasses there.

Haha, yeah. If only. I'm not even a candidate for Lasik.  :|

Also here's the original picture, although this version is significantly less interesting.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v651/i_so_rule/lemonade.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 26 Sep 2007, 16:12
You look nicer without optic blasts blazing out of your eyes.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Silverback on 26 Sep 2007, 16:32
(Optic Blast Eyes pic)

WOOOOOOO MAKIN' SOME LEMONADE.
That was the funniest thing I have seen in a week.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 26 Sep 2007, 16:52
my kingdom for a delete button
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: fatty on 26 Sep 2007, 17:14
Bumming, napping, gabblying. Geeks represent.

(http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k303/aka-fatty/IMG_7761.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 26 Sep 2007, 17:33
Looks fun.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 26 Sep 2007, 17:51
Wait, wait! Is it too late to post a jesus picture?

Long hair does not a Jesus make.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Boro_Bandito on 26 Sep 2007, 18:07
robes, a look of peace and tranquility and arm spreading do though when used in tandem.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 26 Sep 2007, 18:34
I'm sitting on 20/18 eyes. I am one fifth of a person better than the rest of you 'perfect' suckers.

20/10, bizznatch. Sometimes I see so clearly it hurts me.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 26 Sep 2007, 19:06
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/FSCN7370.jpg)

I cut my bangs...and I went to school looking like this. I wore my favorite outfit :D
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 26 Sep 2007, 19:31
Someone as pretty as you should not spend as much time on a webforum. It's just wrong.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 26 Sep 2007, 19:38
Pretty people are allowed here. Looks can be deceiving, people are not always what you expect, and sometimes there straight up just isn't a lot to do in Alaska.
Plus, just because they might intimidate some people, pretty people are not necessarily fearless or self-confident.

P.S. Theme?
(http://img171.imageshack.us/img171/4729/p1020274mu6.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 26 Sep 2007, 20:09
i think he was just trying to emphasize how pretty she was.

also: i am some sort of bird now

(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v133/198/87/1067820001/n1067820001_2008_8712.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 26 Sep 2007, 20:16
Mute, we do not judge people here based on their looks. Looks can be deceiving, people are not always what you expect, and sometimes there straight up just isn't a lot to do in Alaska.
Plus, just because they might intimidate some people, pretty people are not necessarily fearless or self-confident.

Also he needs to wait like three years before his lustful ways are legal.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 26 Sep 2007, 20:36
exactly. i won't stand for any child exploitation, the idea of it offends my being
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 26 Sep 2007, 20:40
Someone as pretty as you should not spend as much time on a webforum. It's just wrong.
I'm taking an online course at BYU so I spend lots of time procrastinating and pretending to do geometry. Once the hockey season starts though, forum time will be cut.Hockey is,like, the one thing to do in Alaska other than riding the polar bears and building igloos.

Also he needs to wait like three years before his lustful ways are legal.

2 years *cough*
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 26 Sep 2007, 20:49
Haha, you seem excited.

Also there is SO much more to do in Alaska than build igloos or ride polar bears or play hockey. YOU CAN SNOWSHOE and ICE FISH and shit!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: sandysmilinstrange on 26 Sep 2007, 20:55
Can we back up and mention what a nice profile Dan has? Just saying, maybe we should.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: celticgeek on 26 Sep 2007, 20:59
Speaking of glasses.  I have worn glasses since I was thirteen years old, so that I could see distant things.

However, I am sort of in the middle/between glasses right now.  I still need them, but entirely different ones.  I will have a final eye check next month.

Thanks to the magic of cataract surgery, I now have new bionic eyes (not X-Ray vision, however, just bionic).  The new eyes are very nice.  Everything is much cleaner, brighter, newer and fresher looking than before.  Except for me, of course.  I can now see myself in the mirror, and I look OLD.  I asked my surgeon about this, and he pointed out (in paragraph three of the fine print, which I can now read) that this was a highly probable side effect.  He also said that he could not do anything about it, but he did give me the telephone number of his brother-in-law, the plastic surgeon.

To check the new eyes out, I have re-read all of the picture threads, and you people are even better looking than I thought. 

Iechyd Da!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 26 Sep 2007, 21:05
Daniel, I love that picture.  You seriously look like my grandfather. 

Yet I am angry!!!
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b131/sutekitatakai/Photo94.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 26 Sep 2007, 21:11
(http://www.cuba.or.at/LMdata/zzzban_che_cigar.jpg)

--edit--
IiG's post interrupted mine.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 26 Sep 2007, 21:21

also: i am some sort of bird now
*cute hair photo here*

I love love love it shaved now.  it looks a million better and almost makes me miss my mowhawk.  it was too much effort though, and so curly.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 26 Sep 2007, 22:37
Yeah, srsly. I don't know how you can pull that off, Roo, but it totally does suit you. Quite a contrast to the 2-foot hairz of recent history.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 26 Sep 2007, 23:24
also: i am some sort of bird now

(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v133/198/87/1067820001/n1067820001_2008_8712.jpg)

Roo you have to stop this. Seriously, stop it. I cannot afford to give up my arduous pursuit of getting into I Is Grammar's pants, especially just to get chucked in the Big House. (This is beside the fact that I ultimately belong to Barfy anyway.)


Stop it.









Edit: Also, Dan, that picture would be perfect except for the Livestrong bracelet. Real Men from that era did not wear fancy schmancy-pants joo-ry, and that bracelet counts; my grandaddy said so.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 26 Sep 2007, 23:34
Also, Dan, that picture would be perfect except for the Livestrong bracelet. Real Men from that era did not wear fancy schmancy-pants joo-ry, and that bracelet counts; my grandaddy said so.

Man I guess that means Sgt. Don Malarkey there isn't a real man.

(http://www.majordickwinters.com/Photos/110-1044_IMG.JPG)

One of us is going to have to break it to him.  I think it should be you.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 26 Sep 2007, 23:41
Dude, why would you wear two watches?















Oh wait.

(http://newsday.typepad.com/photos/uncategorized/flav.jpg)


Dude can keep his two watches.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 26 Sep 2007, 23:43
I mean, his Bronze Star not withstanding, he is obviously wearing a bracelet of some sort so he must be some sort of girly man faggoty type.

(http://www.majordickwinters.com/Photos/110-1070_IMG.JPG)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 26 Sep 2007, 23:48
Hey, man, I am just repeating what Gramps said about That Era.




When he said it, I did not point out that he was the only one of his buddies, even the married ones, to be wearing a wedding ring. I wonder if they thought he was a namby-pamby.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 27 Sep 2007, 02:05
You know, while I was in Alaska this summer, a very rugged, manly-man fisherman came into work wearing a shirt with his wedding certificate screenprinted onto a white t-shirt. The reason, as I found out, was because he'd made a deal with his wife to wear the shirt on the boat instead of his wedding ring for safety reasons.

NO FRIGGIN' EXCUSES, JEWELRY IS NEVER ALLOWED.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 27 Sep 2007, 06:05
Bah, if he was a real manly man he'd wear the ring and RIDE THE DANGER.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 27 Sep 2007, 06:52
Today's clothing forecast, partly hipster with a chance of nerdy
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v352/redglasscurls/Narcissism/nerdy.jpg?t=1190901093)
Better pack an umbrella
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: supertankguy on 27 Sep 2007, 07:00
Not wearing the ring with a wife is arguably more dangerous.  That man is a true American hero :salute:

Things to do in Alaska:

Meet wildlife
(http://img474.imageshack.us/img474/6771/alaska1ib7.jpg)

Sink ATVs:
(http://img124.imageshack.us/img124/5383/alaska2kg0.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 2.0 on 27 Sep 2007, 08:05
I was in alaska like 10 years ago. It was a motorhome family roadtrip through alaska.  BOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOOORING.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pilsner on 27 Sep 2007, 08:05
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/Xtract/random/pda01.jpg)

OM NOM NOM NOM NOM
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LiterSize on 27 Sep 2007, 10:08
Isn't Ruyi 18 or somesuch?  Why would Calenlass get thrown into jail for mating with the willing?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 27 Sep 2007, 10:27
Ruyi is 12.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 27 Sep 2007, 10:30
Brian: Roo is at uni a wee bit early. Like, two or three years early.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: abadname on 27 Sep 2007, 12:24
Hey I'm back for a bit, but nobody remembers me.  Pictures
(http://a33.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/84/m_d075c6a043d1ad9e10af9d6236beab78.jpg)
(http://a600.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/83/m_1d2eede22da1d8d19fa0412ea1ba54b7.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 27 Sep 2007, 13:20
Joe would know. I think they're related or something.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 27 Sep 2007, 13:36
I mean, his Bronze Star not withstanding, he is obviously wearing a bracelet of some sort so he must be some sort of girly man faggoty type.

Actually it looks like one of those medical bracelets that people with medical conditions wear so if they have to go for ambulance rides, the guys there know to check wrists/necklaces to find out if they're allergic to anything or if they need a certain medication immediately.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 27 Sep 2007, 13:52
It's very likely that it is.  Diabetes is the big one, heart conditions too.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 27 Sep 2007, 13:53
Joe would know. I think they're related or something.
Ruyi is 10.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pilsner on 27 Sep 2007, 14:03
Ruyi is not nearly that old.  She just pretends on the internet.  Here is an actual picture of Ruyi taken last week:

[img width= height=]http://i152.photobucket.com/albums/s168/pilsner888/Sonogram2012-21-0420Body-Crop.jpg[/img]
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 27 Sep 2007, 17:15
TAKE THAT DOWN IMMEDIATELY I AM NOT WEARING ANY CLOTHES
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 27 Sep 2007, 17:51
See, Ruyi's so cool she can even make child porn funny!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Rizzo on 27 Sep 2007, 18:02
Ruyi, you have inspired me to get my mohawk back. I just need to grow my hair out a bit further.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 27 Sep 2007, 19:42
Rizzo please do. Please do.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: David_Dovey on 27 Sep 2007, 20:49
Aw, hey, why are you so downcast, drawing-Sam? Someone thinks you're phat! Life is good!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 27 Sep 2007, 21:11
See, Ruyi's so cool she can even make child porn funny!


Great, I make one offhand comment and suddenly the whole board goes lolita on me.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 27 Sep 2007, 21:14
Someone as pretty as you should not spend as much time on a webforum. It's just wrong.
Randall Munroe is my favorite human being ever. (http://xkcd.com/322/)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 27 Sep 2007, 22:38
Well, I dunno. I think it would have been something if I said "boobs or GTFO", rather than that. 'Sides, if we weren't comfortable enough with our appearance to take a small tongue-in-cheek comment like that well (though I apologize if I have somehow offended anyone), what we're doing posting in the photo thread is beyond me.


But Randall definitely has a point, and is uncanny.

Anyway, I have posted so many times without a pic, I owe you something really awesome this time.
(http://img455.imageshack.us/img455/7586/blingxc0.jpg)
Yes. Complete with bling. I have been known to wear the USB cable around my neck and have it on a chronograph function, perfect for a recreation of the one Weird Al music video.
Now I just need to do something about my stage name. For some reason I can't come up with something good, the best one I can think of so far is "Limit Lim" or something lame like that.

And for those of you not 100% clear with that, yes, I am parodying Flava Flav with that sentiment. I would do it here, but you can't see it well with my webcam.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: godinpants on 28 Sep 2007, 00:48
Bumming, napping, gabblying. NEGLECTING MY SAX. Geeks represent.

How could you.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: fatty on 28 Sep 2007, 06:51
sorry saxomaphone :(

Slick: I 1up you.
(http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k303/aka-fatty/IMG_7838.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: richardsdm on 28 Sep 2007, 07:15
(http://photos.imageevent.com/richardsdm/impact/websize/Late%20October%20013.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 28 Sep 2007, 07:26
Dude, what the fuck just happened?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: richardsdm on 28 Sep 2007, 07:32
That's a fake fur blanket/rug that was donated to my pet adoption center.  For some reason we decided to take pictures of me wearing it.  This is what not taking a day off in several months gets you.  However, it really is the best picture of me, which sort of scares me a little bit if I must be totally honest.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Misereatur on 28 Sep 2007, 07:42
also: i am some sort of bird now

Whenever I open the picture thread, I stop and stare at ruyi's picture for about 10 minutes or so before moving on.

The only thing I can think of is whoa.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 2.0 on 28 Sep 2007, 08:07
Yes. Complete with bling.

.bling.
(http://aycu20.webshots.com/image/27299/2002904369674664207_rs.jpg)
*nerdgasm*
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Boro_Bandito on 28 Sep 2007, 08:09
someone stole my damn TI-83!!! Sorry, don't mean to take it out on you, but you are so smug, with you're TI-83 Plus and all, just sitting there without a care in the world. Well let me tell you something.... *sniff*
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ladybug on 28 Sep 2007, 09:44
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v26/mariasha/Bilde237-1.jpg)
My Casio CFX-9850GB Plus <3

I'm not allowed to use it on exams and stuff, though :( I hate the goddamn HP 30S.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Gemmwah on 28 Sep 2007, 09:54
(http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y172/FrozenLily/IMAG0006-1.jpg)

My hair finally grew long enough so I can style it properly!

Hooray!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 2.0 on 28 Sep 2007, 10:09
I hate the goddamn HP 30S.

I also have an HP 50g, agreed, HP sucks, worst piece of junk ever created.  It's a bitch to operate.  Then again maybe i'm just not smart enough to learn how to use them.  Long live casios and their outstanding programming capabilities.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 28 Sep 2007, 11:07
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v26/mariasha/Bilde237-1.jpg)
My Casio CFX-9850GB Plus <3

I'm not allowed to use it on exams and stuff, though :( I hate the goddamn HP 30S.

My TI-89 is banned because it uses CAS... but only for my calculus class (I see if I can borrow an 83/84 from a hallmate). It's fine for physics, which is good.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: celticgeek on 28 Sep 2007, 11:43
Old Nerd Bling:

(http://g.virbcdn.com/cdnImages/noResize/Image-47710-883554-SlideRules_01.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 28 Sep 2007, 11:52
ooh, slide rules. RESPECK
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ladybug on 28 Sep 2007, 12:05
[image]
My Casio CFX-9850GB Plus <3

I'm not allowed to use it on exams and stuff, though :( I hate the goddamn HP 30S.

My TI-89 is banned because it uses CAS... but only for my calculus class (I see if I can borrow an 83/84 from a hallmate). It's fine for physics, which is good.
We're not allowed anything else than the HP 30S in any of the math-subjects or physics.. And the HP is pretty basic (the Casio one cost 900NOK in high school, the HP costs like 150NOK, so there's quite the difference) and the layout, buttons and everything is craap.

Also, more geeky goodness <3
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v26/mariasha/Bilde228.jpg)
Couldn't be bothered to flip it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 28 Sep 2007, 13:14
(http://img529.imageshack.us/img529/9268/00001aj4.jpg)

(http://img220.imageshack.us/img220/923/00014ho0.jpg)


It looks better when you see it in meat life.


Really.


(Also, nipple!)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SusurrusIgnoramus on 28 Sep 2007, 13:16
AAAAHHH ZOMBIE!!!

jk :-P
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pilsner on 28 Sep 2007, 13:18
I think someone just exited the Matrix. 

. . .

. . .

. . .

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 28 Sep 2007, 13:29
Just to explain, a hairdresser fucked up my hair so I shaved what was left off.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pilsner on 28 Sep 2007, 13:38
This is one of those rare situations where I think a person would be better off if they did come to a web forum for advice.  Oh well, it will grow back. 

DON'T GET HEAD TATTOOS!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 2.0 on 28 Sep 2007, 13:39

It looks better when you see it in meat life.


Everything looks better in meat.

And becase i'm a creativity-lacking copycat, i shall style my hair the same way this weekend. Perhaps.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SusurrusIgnoramus on 28 Sep 2007, 13:48
GET HEAD TATTOOS!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 28 Sep 2007, 13:51
Send me money so I can get head tattoos*


*not guaranteed to happen.


LESS YAPPIE MORE SNAPPIE
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 28 Sep 2007, 15:28
GET HEAD!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 28 Sep 2007, 16:37
Slick: I 1up you.

HaHA!

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/P9280015.jpg)

Also, I shaved (Mostly). I'm kind of pissed at myself:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/P9280013.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 28 Sep 2007, 19:36
carefree youths

or

bonobos grooming each other

YOU DECIDE
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 28 Sep 2007, 20:13
(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/MyPicture-14.jpg)


GUYS WE ARE HAS PARTYS



THE FUNNY HAT MEANS IT IS A SERIOUS BUSINESS PARTY
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 28 Sep 2007, 21:06
mang i am sry but it waz honest mitsake


luv2u?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 28 Sep 2007, 23:14
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/ThatsspoonplayingBlackLikeMeismyfav.jpg)

Proof to mom that I liked the CD she got me for my birthday (Spoon) and that I actually listen to it. Crap picture but w/e.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 29 Sep 2007, 00:40
This is a notice to say that Hannah has realised that she takes too many photos of herself, so she is going to avoid partaking in photothreads for a while. She farewells you all with a series of photos:
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/me/break1.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/me/break2.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/me/break3.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 29 Sep 2007, 02:46
Noooo Hannar!

Also, by unpopular demand:

(http://img455.imageshack.us/img455/8710/1000967sl2.jpg)

(http://img206.imageshack.us/img206/2297/1000968fi2.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 29 Sep 2007, 05:13
What the fuck, Dan.
In many cases, bad hair is better than no hair at all.
This is one of those cases.



Also, I filled my beanbag and thingos went everywhere.
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1051/1442598200_fb6b46bac1.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 29 Sep 2007, 05:28
oops looks like some went down the front of your shirt, you better fish around for them.

*watches contentedly*
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Johnny C on 29 Sep 2007, 09:24
(http://i87.photobucket.com/albums/k157/jcsunshine/powder.jpg)




just kidding dude
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 29 Sep 2007, 10:21
You wouldn't have the balls to not be kidding, Johnny C.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 29 Sep 2007, 10:32
Shock & awe, Dan.
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Skibas_clavicle/awesome.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 29 Sep 2007, 11:55
In all of Dan's hairless pictures, he look like he is about to kick someone's ass.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 29 Sep 2007, 12:40
You mean like this (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/1/10/KungFU.jpg) guy?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 29 Sep 2007, 12:58
Pretty much.


Except I am thinking more of a guy who stands in the corner at punk shows with his arms crossed, and a forever grimace on his face.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 29 Sep 2007, 14:33
Shock & awe, Dan.
[IMG]

Did I ever tell you that you have really pretty eyes? Yeah...you have really pretty eyes..

and Lunchbox,
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: schimmy on 29 Sep 2007, 15:50
Dear QC, today was the beginning of my modelling career. Better pictures to come later.
(http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee300/n1xxa1/022.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 29 Sep 2007, 15:54
I have a blonde Telecaster exactly like the one behind you.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: schimmy on 29 Sep 2007, 16:03
The guy who owns it is the guy who's dress I'm wearing.
He is pretty cool.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 29 Sep 2007, 17:58
It'd look better with heels and a nice necklace.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: celticgeek on 29 Sep 2007, 22:41
And those socks definitely have to go.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: est on 29 Sep 2007, 23:42
I had some drinks before the football last night, then some more after.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v371/est_xplosif/qc/est_we_won_i_think.jpg)

We won, I think?

I got pretty circus drunk.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: McTaggart on 30 Sep 2007, 01:39
I think if you were on the side that lost someone would have rubbed it in your face by now.

[edit] 115 points was it!?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 30 Sep 2007, 04:42
That is not the look of a man that would remember the specific score.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: McTaggart on 30 Sep 2007, 05:14
True, but if your team lost by such a margin after talking themselves up so much before the game, someone supporting the other team would have been kind enough to inform you every chance they got.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Aimless on 30 Sep 2007, 05:32
öde, you could (should!!) get big cartoon eyes painted on the back of your head, like Casper!!!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 30 Sep 2007, 06:30
Weinberger?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 30 Sep 2007, 08:54
Dan Looks Like Billy Corgan.

Ruyi is challenging my perceptions of what Ruyi can be.

I will have pictures eventually.

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ZJGent on 30 Sep 2007, 11:41
All-new not-new retro sunglasses, woo!
Kiss kiss, QC.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/zeejay_djinn/sunglies1.gif)

Pucker up.

SUPER SPECIAL BONUS STAGE: http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/zeejay_djinn/sunglies2.gif (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/zeejay_djinn/sunglies2.gif)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 30 Sep 2007, 15:03
You guys are doing really well at being hot. Roddy, don't wear those glasses and that shirt at the same time, people will think you're a retro-freak.

Oh man new page, now I have to put up a picture or something

(http://img404.imageshack.us/img404/8404/1000972id9.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ZJGent on 30 Sep 2007, 15:08
gee, I didn't even think about the T-shirt. The T-shirt is cool though. Professional Crime Fighters, and all that.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 30 Sep 2007, 15:12
It has a sexy car on it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tyler on 30 Sep 2007, 19:32
Like Dan, I decided to cut my hair.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a373/teresias216/me1.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a373/teresias216/me3.jpg)

Not bad for a friend with scissors and an electric razor.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 30 Sep 2007, 19:36
Whoever is in possession of Tyler's computer at this point is obviously good at using archived photos of him, as we all know Tyler was killed in a drive by several months ago.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Boro_Bandito on 30 Sep 2007, 20:18
I decidedly had too much sugar this evening in the form of gingerbread cookies.

(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y110/Wildkyn/PhilipsQCpictures009.jpg)

(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y110/Wildkyn/PhilipsQCpictures011.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ZJGent on 30 Sep 2007, 20:38
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/zeejay_djinn/kfc.gif)
=
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/zeejay_djinn/061113_kfc_logo_vmed5p.widec.jpg)

... no?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: David_Dovey on 30 Sep 2007, 21:00
DID SOMEBODY SAY EXCELLENT HAT?

(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a55/ddovey/Photo8.jpg)

(Me, I'm saying it now.)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 30 Sep 2007, 23:22
Cue "HA HA I'M USING TEH SHAVING FOAMS" guy plz
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 01 Oct 2007, 07:25
Aw yeah motherfucks.

(http://img409.imageshack.us/img409/9223/1000980us0.jpg)
(http://img102.imageshack.us/img102/7058/1000983ct1.jpg)

Crotch Tetris.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 01 Oct 2007, 07:27
We went into woods for like, 5 days. This is one of the pictures. It features me, and some homies.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v209/Seanbateman/n1380840033_30111930_1639.jpg)

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mooface on 01 Oct 2007, 08:18

MY EYES WILL EAT YOU

(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v133/55/6/1402230136/n1402230136_30231522_9769.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pilsner on 01 Oct 2007, 08:26
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/zeejay_djinn/sunglies1.gif)

(http://www.nwdrizzle.com/drizzle/0507/images/tw/telephono.jpg)

!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SusurrusIgnoramus on 01 Oct 2007, 08:30
[picture of lunchbox]

please don't think this is creepy, when i say you are the prettiest person on the boards.

besides myself, naturally.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 01 Oct 2007, 08:38
You'd definitely enjoy perusing her Flickr account (http://www.flickr.com/photos/slackadaisy/) then.

Masturbate yourself unconscious!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 01 Oct 2007, 08:42
You'll especially enjoy the one of "the boy being handsome."
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SusurrusIgnoramus on 01 Oct 2007, 08:51
you just turned a well-meant compliment into something creepy... sadly, it's inevitable on the internet...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pilsner on 01 Oct 2007, 09:14
You'll especially enjoy the one of "the boy being handsome."


I know I did.

*bites knuckles*
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 01 Oct 2007, 10:33
you just turned a well-meant compliment into something creepy... sadly, it's inevitable on the internet...

In before "box lunch" innuendo.

(Man, times like this I wish I kept my old hedgie avatar.)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 01 Oct 2007, 11:29
The girl next to MaiAda,
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pilsner on 01 Oct 2007, 11:46
Is anyone else as tired of this clich/meme as I am,
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 01 Oct 2007, 11:54
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v631/kauhornz/Photo28.jpg)
The photothread is not alternately called "Race to the Innuendo!!!1" for a reason, people.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 01 Oct 2007, 12:47
All must behold my gangsta self.

(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v141/92/13/1097760019/n1097760019_30009279_4499.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 01 Oct 2007, 17:20
. . . and she was the happiest gangster in the whole wide world!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: carnivoracious on 01 Oct 2007, 18:09
You're a gangster huh...
(http://i170.photobucket.com/albums/u264/carnivoracious/prtygngstrmslf.jpg)
Actually, I'm pretty gangster myself.

My Hanners shirt came in the mail Saturday.  :lol:
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 01 Oct 2007, 18:10
So guys, I spent yesterday lounging around on the boy's boat.
This was when I was enjoying myself:
(http://img250.imageshack.us/img250/2050/weekend30thseptember009wn4.jpg)

This was when I was scared (I am on the right):
(http://img209.imageshack.us/img209/6424/weekend30thseptember015sq5.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 01 Oct 2007, 18:15
Like Dan, I decided to cut my hair.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a373/teresias216/me1.jpg)

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a373/teresias216/me3.jpg)

Not bad for a friend with scissors and an electric razor.


Nice shirt.



and receding hairline.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 01 Oct 2007, 19:35
Receding hairlines are hot.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 01 Oct 2007, 19:46
You know, initially I thought: "Jesus, what a dick thing to say," but then I scrolled back up and saw it was Kiefer who wrote it and suddenly it was completely okay. My mind acknowledges how absolutely wrong that is, yet I can't help but think it. This really is an epidemic.

Also, you people want gangsta?

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/P8110001.jpg)

THAT is gangsta'
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tyler on 01 Oct 2007, 20:13
Its ok. I watched his girlfriend shower.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 01 Oct 2007, 21:32
Looks like we have plenty of gangstas around here. Let's start a gang.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 01 Oct 2007, 21:49
This is what I look like if I run clean out of hair products/shampoo... really flat, really shiny hair.
(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v134/77/17/5739266/n5739266_36155586_2683.jpg)
Silly expression is due to the fact that this was taken at 3am, sleep madness setting in.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: philharmonic on 01 Oct 2007, 22:00
too bad you not playing that guitar beside you. it might have improved the "Play a Guitar" thread.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 01 Oct 2007, 22:39
Cute! expression is due to the fact that this was taken at 3am, sleep madness setting in.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ummmkay on 01 Oct 2007, 23:08
I dyed my hair again! It is intense auburn. It is kind of messy in this picture though.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v651/i_so_rule/auburn.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 02 Oct 2007, 00:14
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v249/dramajuana/Remo%20and%20Me/Random/invitationscrop-1.jpg)


Mailing wedding invitations is exciting.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 02 Oct 2007, 04:11
I find it really amusing that you're wearing a giant sweater and a big floofy lined jacket, and your boy is in a teeshirt:D

Ps Ummmkay, you're adorable!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ummmkay on 02 Oct 2007, 06:02
:) Thanks!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 02 Oct 2007, 11:14
I get cold easily. *nods*

Oh, and by the way ummmkay: I really like your hair color. You totally pull that off.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 02 Oct 2007, 12:08
We've got to have an intervention.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v631/kauhornz/Photo29-2.jpg)
I can't stop cutting my hair.
God help me.  I am going to get this fixed tomorrow.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 02 Oct 2007, 12:20
Its ok. I watched his girlfriend shower.

Yeah, but I get the shoes.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Edith on 02 Oct 2007, 12:26
I am ADDICTED TO CANDY CORN

(http://i126.photobucket.com/albums/p107/pinkgrrlygeek/QC%20photos/candycorn.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: clockworkjames on 02 Oct 2007, 12:36
CORM! NOM NOM NOM.

(http://img233.imageshack.us/img233/3402/dsc00617dj8.jpg)
amidoinitrite?

oh, and THIS is gangsta.
(http://a620.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/53/l_10f951f927b82379a87040952f17bf9b.jpg)
bus station, 40oz, 2pac on minidisk, timer on camera phone.
Yeah...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 02 Oct 2007, 12:37
Guess what happens to the first person to ask PGG if she's British :P

*Pounds palm of hand with fist meaningfully*
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: clockworkjames on 02 Oct 2007, 12:41
We don't have candy corm in the UK :/
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 02 Oct 2007, 12:49
That is not the point. :(
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 02 Oct 2007, 12:50
(It was a joke about british people having bad teeth, see.)


(It's funny because it's a stereotype.)


(It's a stereotype because it's true.)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: iliketodraw on 02 Oct 2007, 12:59
(British people have bad teeth).

(American people are all fat).

(Australian people are all related to convicts).

Edit: Stereotypes are fucking lame.

P.S: These guys are gangsta.

(http://www.viceland.com/int/dos_donts/1055/main.jpg?44)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tyler on 02 Oct 2007, 13:52
I want their shoes.

I would start a gang war for them.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 02 Oct 2007, 14:12
I will fight you for the green and yellow ones.

You are going down.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 02 Oct 2007, 14:45
(http://img248.imageshack.us/img248/8707/suitkx2.jpg)

Me before a friend's wedding on Saturday.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: clockworkjames on 02 Oct 2007, 14:50
I appreciate that watch, it is awesome.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 02 Oct 2007, 15:06
mberan42 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Andy_Bernard)

Yes?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 02 Oct 2007, 15:18
Mberan42 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/G_man)

Yes.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ryszardthebored1 on 02 Oct 2007, 17:50
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y229/loserman288/grilla-1.jpg)

High-school turnabout dance 2 years ago, theme: Classic Hollywood.

Enter King Kong = I get suspended
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Boro_Bandito on 02 Oct 2007, 17:57
are you kidding me? for that? That's hilarious! I mean the idea is, why would they ruin the fun like that. Damn I'm glad I'm not in high school anymore.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 02 Oct 2007, 18:03
Clearly, high school sucks.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 02 Oct 2007, 18:11
I can't believe they suspended you for that. My alma mater might have made you take off the mask, but that's about it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: made from ribs on 02 Oct 2007, 18:13
...at my school they encouraged masks.



(http://i22.tinypic.com/217uow.png)
oh boy!
to much free time! :D
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ryszardthebored1 on 02 Oct 2007, 18:21
The dean told me it was a liability on them if I tumble down the stairs for wearing a mask/costume that I chose and that I was responsible for doing.. my suspension lasted for one day because I had half the faculty behind me (I went to a small private, Catholic high school.. I made a name for myself..)

ah, well... Silly Photo Booth picture time!

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y229/loserman288/Photo6.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 02 Oct 2007, 19:12
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0785.jpg)
I'm so over my hair.  I'm going on a road trip with my best friend for a week starting on sunday.  Well a 10 hour road trip to my parents place, stay there for a week and drive home.  But the point is I plan to give my hair a drastic makeover when I get home, because my mum's best friend is a hairdresser. huzzah!  You can expect new and exciting and less crap things!

Anyway...I have a new skirt!  Isn't it cute!
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0790.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 02 Oct 2007, 19:41
fricking sweet
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 02 Oct 2007, 20:59
Cheesy smile!  But it nicely shows my new haircut.  It looks better in person, but I like this picture.  I will be auburn-haired shortly. 

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b131/sutekitatakai/MyPicture-11.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 02 Oct 2007, 21:41
to much free time!

(raises a glass)

Huzzah!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 02 Oct 2007, 22:50
Mr. Beran 42 (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sharp_Dressed_Man)

Yes!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 03 Oct 2007, 00:55
Namely the suspenders, hat, and entrenching tool.

You're looking more and more revolutionary every month.

Except the suspenders, I'm not sure how revolutionary they are.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 03 Oct 2007, 01:03
(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/DSCF0001copy.jpg)


Guys I bought a dress. WTF.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 03 Oct 2007, 01:04
Katie that is awesome news.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 03 Oct 2007, 01:07
Katie that is awesome news.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 03 Oct 2007, 01:11
Something tells me I might need a mink stole and pin curls to really make it work.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 03 Oct 2007, 02:22
Either that or a shawl so that you get that Greek thing going on.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SusurrusIgnoramus on 03 Oct 2007, 06:49
[wedding guy]

that it quite possibly the coolest decemberists poster i've ever seen.  where can i get one?  can i get one?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 03 Oct 2007, 06:54
Wedding guy? He has a name, y'know!

Edit: What a coimplete waste of my 1,000th post.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: negative creep on 03 Oct 2007, 07:25
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v225/todesfuesch/dblck.jpg)
i dyed my hair black.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LiterSize on 03 Oct 2007, 10:29
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/Xtract/random/copyVillage_Pose01.jpg)


I cloned myself!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 03 Oct 2007, 12:16
Holy crap, bendy legs
(http://photos-988.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sctm/v125/215/35/5740988/n5740988_36159917_7559.jpg)
I never realized before how much doing this makes me look like I've been in some horrible accident
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SusurrusIgnoramus on 03 Oct 2007, 12:58
i don't know whether to be turned on, or disgusted... or disgusted that i might be turned on...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 03 Oct 2007, 13:31
My legs can do bendy-type things. I wonder if they can do that... I'll try somewhere where there's carpet.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 03 Oct 2007, 13:49
i don't know whether to be turned on, or disgusted... or disgusted that i might be turned on...

I can do it too. Does this mean you want to make kissy faces with meeeee? [ ] yes [ ] no
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: schimmy on 03 Oct 2007, 14:07
(http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee300/n1xxa1/iwant.jpg?t=1191445500)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 03 Oct 2007, 14:43
[ ] yes [X] no

I don't think I could keep my lunch down watching a boy do that. It seems....well...wrong.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Maui on 03 Oct 2007, 15:24
I went to my first nhl game! It was only preseason but it made for good times anyhow.  I enjoy yelling, so i am a good hockey fan.

This is my friend emily and i approving of the awesome-ness that was a mini Buffalo Sabres helmet that our dippin dots came in.
(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a78/rachMH727/rachelandemsabres.jpg)

I left my eyes red to match the old logo! or maybe because i don't have any photo editing programs on this computer.  You decide!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 03 Oct 2007, 15:53
You're looking more and more revolutionary every month.
Less and less! We have long since said goodbye to Daniel Castro.

RGC, I do not understand what is going on in that picture.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 03 Oct 2007, 15:57
My left leg is being all anatomically impossible and stuff
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tyrial on 03 Oct 2007, 16:00
How do you discover your leg can do that?  :?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 03 Oct 2007, 16:15
Step 1: Drink beer.

Step 2: Accept bet.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tyrial on 03 Oct 2007, 16:59
Step 5: Visit local Hospital
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jolijn on 03 Oct 2007, 17:31
somewhere in between is profit  :?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Dimmukane on 03 Oct 2007, 19:04
Step 3:  Take your newfound double-jointedness and panhandle on the boardwalk of (insert coastal city here)

Step 4:  Profit???
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 03 Oct 2007, 19:21
I appreciate that watch, it is awesome.

Breitling Colt, circa 2003. It's an awesome timepiece.

that it quite possibly the coolest decemberists poster i've ever seen.  where can i get one?  can i get one?

Thanks. I dunno if you can get one - I purchased it at Flatstock at Pitchfork Music Festival 2006.

Wedding guy? He has a name, y'know!

Edit: What a coimplete waste of my 1,000th post.

It is NEVER a waste when talking about me!

(http://img514.imageshack.us/img514/7876/suit2uf1.jpg)

Another pic from before the wedding. Taken in my bathroom sans flash or stable surface, so it's blurry.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: KTkat on 03 Oct 2007, 20:16
Nevermind. I think photobucket hates me.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: made from ribs on 03 Oct 2007, 20:36

It is NEVER a waste when talking about me!


shock and amazement.
someone as positively conceited as i am!
yay life.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 03 Oct 2007, 20:48
More snappy please!

I sing in the kitchen on occasion.

(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1198/1473461519_78ca375117.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 03 Oct 2007, 21:19
(http://digilander.libero.it/davidhasselhoff/foto/nickfury/fury1.jpg)
IMHO
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 03 Oct 2007, 21:29
Definitely Nick Fury. Comic geekery minus the hype of 300, and not quite as geeky as being a videogame character.
I've decided I'm going to be Medusa this year, it's going to be fun:D
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 03 Oct 2007, 21:31
Manda, you hit the nail on the head as far as my dilemma goes.  If I don't do Leonidas this year, I can't really pull it off any other year as it will be too old by then.  OTOH, I'm sure there are going to be way too many pale, skinny ass college guys with fake facial hair dressed up as Spartans.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 03 Oct 2007, 21:40
Then this costume hinges on whether you can build up a set of abs that could crush an innocent child in approximately a month!

PICHTURS
Today's silly hairdo brought to you courtesy of the water main break in my building preventing me from showering
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v352/redglasscurls/Narcissism/sillyhair.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 03 Oct 2007, 21:53
The leg bend pic is old, but I did this one specifically for the occasion:
(http://img511.imageshack.us/img511/5102/jeschillinyq3.th.png) (http://img511.imageshack.us/my.php?image=jeschillinyq3.png)


No photoshop magic, BTW. I just got rid of the BG 'cause I don't know how much my roomate wants his half of the room posted online for everyone to see, like his desk and everything.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Napoleon the Clown on 03 Oct 2007, 22:44
<snip>


Guys I bought a dress. WTF.
It is a pretty dress.

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y43/NapoleontheClown/normal003.jpg)
A few months old.  Goofy eyes win.

(New page.  I win.)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Johnny C on 03 Oct 2007, 22:48
Snake Plissken?

a videogame character.

(http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/3005/photo195gv7.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 03 Oct 2007, 22:55
Eeep sorry, I thought he was talking about Metal Gear Solid Snake... he kinda looks like him in that getup too.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Johnny C on 03 Oct 2007, 22:56
If he took off the shirt he could be Snake from MGS3.

Daniel, I seriously urge you to consider this course of action.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 03 Oct 2007, 23:31
If you do choose this course of action you need to talk like David Hayter at all times. In other words, start smoking like, 6 packs a day from now until Halloween.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 03 Oct 2007, 23:37
Hey guys.

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/jimmy5times/DSC00242.gif)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 03 Oct 2007, 23:40
Snake Plissken?

a videogame character.

Lordy Lordy, so this is what they meant by our schools failing our children.  I missed this Johnny, thanks for catching it.  Manda, you need to go rent a bunch of John Carpenter films right now.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Johnny C on 03 Oct 2007, 23:50
any excuse to post that picture of me really

i won't rest until a full 50% of my photos are macros on this forum
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 04 Oct 2007, 00:02
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b131/sutekitatakai/MyPicture-12.jpg)

(http://frontier.cincinnati.com/blogs/popography/uploaded_images/c_snake_plissken-738606.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 04 Oct 2007, 00:14
(http://static.flickr.com/47/153565778_8a70ebcfdc.jpg)

Metal... Gear?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SusurrusIgnoramus on 04 Oct 2007, 01:27
[ ] yes [ ] no
  • maybe
somewhere in between is profit  :?

how come i got reamed for bringing up an overused meme, and you didn't!  :-P :?


Metal... Queer?

Sorry, couldn't resist... btw, sounds like a pretty cool sub-genre to me... if it doesn't exist already  :wink:
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 04 Oct 2007, 02:23
pic's a year old, but uh, kinda piggybacking off of rgc's i guess?

(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v42/27/51/3302249/n3302249_31491396_2152.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 04 Oct 2007, 05:00
Dang I wish I could still do all those crazy things with my double joints, but now I am old and I have arthritis or gout or leprosy and my legs are about for fall off for realz.

(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1104/1416304818_7f30a13f7f.jpg)

I have a balcony.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 04 Oct 2007, 05:53
Definitely Nick Fury. Comic geekery minus the hype of 300, and not quite as geeky as being a videogame character.
Snake Plisskin is not a videogame character.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Snake_Plissken

GAWD


EDIT: So like apparently several of us immediately hit Reply when we saw rgc's post because of our outrage over her mistake. I love this forum.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 04 Oct 2007, 06:17
I'm going to be Pete Townshend and I can't yet grow sideburns. This could be a problem. After I shower I'll photo that shit up, but I've already got the guitar for the getup.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 04 Oct 2007, 06:47
OTOH, I'm sure there are going to be way too many pale, skinny ass college guys with fake facial hair dressed up as Spartans.
Which is why you go as Leonidas, with this amazing abs we know you can have, and kick some ass. Just conscript and marshall up anyone else dressed as a spartan.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: godinpants on 04 Oct 2007, 07:28
Which is why you go as Leonidas, with this amazing abs we know you can have, and kick some ass. Just conscript and marshall up anyone else dressed as a spartan.

Marshall up? How about beat down? Or at least give them a good Sparta kicking.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Boro_Bandito on 04 Oct 2007, 07:45
It'd be hilarious if I see a Phalanx walking through Fels Point on Halloween.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Hairy Joe Bob on 04 Oct 2007, 08:48
Nitrous oxide, lovely in your inside!

(http://photos-357.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v134/212/105/509563357/n509563357_203499_4315.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: clockworkjames on 04 Oct 2007, 09:09
Moar snappy, I made some cake but iced and ate most of it before I could take pics. So I made another one.
(http://img125.imageshack.us/img125/3319/200710041bl2.jpg)
Low quality webcam is low quality.
But I got it free for a few headshots at LAN.

It was delishus, normal cake mix with vanilla essence and dried summer fruit berries in it and some treat maple flavour goo drizzled over the top of the mix before ovening so it gives the spiraly effect as it caremelises and burns off, then put lemon buttercream (buttercream and lemonjuice) on it. Then *nom nom nom*
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 04 Oct 2007, 10:53
Nitrous oxide, lovely in your inside!

(http://photos-357.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v134/212/105/509563357/n509563357_203499_4315.jpg)

Hippy crack!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ethney on 04 Oct 2007, 12:01
(http://i22.tinypic.com/kex7yd.jpg)


I'm a Leopard Gecko type of person

Here's Vicious:

http://i23.tinypic.com/j0v282.jpg (http://i23.tinypic.com/j0v282.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 04 Oct 2007, 12:02
Mmmm.....Mountain Dew sure is refreshing!

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b131/sutekitatakai/MyPicture-13.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ZJGent on 04 Oct 2007, 13:58
god... I still haven't gotten over my mountain dew addiction. I'm taking Lucozade supplements like a recovering heroin addict uses methadone.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 04 Oct 2007, 15:52
You had it once, you wimp. Come back when you've chugged 3 cans in the space of an hour and a half.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 04 Oct 2007, 15:59
I gave up most sugar, including Mt Dew. :/
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 04 Oct 2007, 17:14
Quote from: Joe Hocking's Helpful Article
Hideo Kojima has said in an interview that the character designs for Solid Snake and Big Boss were based on Snake Plissken. In the second game Metal Gear Solid 2: Sons of Liberty, the character Snake uses the codename "Iroquois Pliskin" early in the game, as a reference to the character.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Dimmukane on 04 Oct 2007, 20:17
Nitrous oxide, lovely in your inside!

Hippy crack!

I second this sentiment.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: notselfcreated on 04 Oct 2007, 20:45
Cat pics are legit, right?

EDIT: Obliged.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 04 Oct 2007, 20:47
We like pets, but this is probably a better place for them:

http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,17607.0.html
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: WriterofAllWrongs on 04 Oct 2007, 22:46
(http://img512.imageshack.us/img512/2118/newimageub7.png)

Why webcams everywhere should be disrespected.  They are all poor quality jive turkeys.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Elizzybeth on 04 Oct 2007, 23:16
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v321/NvrTooMuchPython/IMG_5334MB.jpg)

I have a chair shaped like an egg.

It's futuristic and makes me feel modern (and / or younger than Daniel).
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: WriterofAllWrongs on 04 Oct 2007, 23:17
Quote
It's futuristic and makes me feel better and / or younger than Daniel.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 05 Oct 2007, 00:26
Dear Elizzybeth,

It is with a heavy heart that I write this letter to inform you that I am reconsidering my consideration of an internet crush on you.  See, I don't own anything as futuristic as that chair other than my iMac and nifty iPhone.  Okay and I have a bunch of other gadgets and sort of a hip neo-retro car.  Your chair just wouldn't fit in with my decor (mixing classic pieces of furniture with an ultramodern loft apartment), and so I feel that I should just nip this in the bud right now.

Sincerely,
Dan

PS. I just bought two more pairs of old man pants (M-65 and M1951 field pants).
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Johnny C on 05 Oct 2007, 00:51
Dear Elizzybeth,

I love your future chair. Enclosed you will find a list of my likes and dislikes.

Sincerely,
JC
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 05 Oct 2007, 01:04
Dear Johnny C,

Hey hey!  Let's not be hasty. I was only reconsidering my consideration.  Committees have to be formed and all.

She is awfully cute.

Sincerely,
Dan
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Misereatur on 05 Oct 2007, 03:54
Dear photothread,

Less yappy more snappy

Sincerely,
Ben

(http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i2/ffgtthttghyujjfdss/lr_20070901_8080.jpg)

I'm in the background threre. This was taken at one of my weekends home in boot camp, I hope this explains the farmer's tan.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 05 Oct 2007, 05:03
My new laptop has a webcam built in! YAY!

(http://img373.imageshack.us/img373/6074/img000004vb5.jpg)

And The Boy has a kitteh!

(http://img373.imageshack.us/img373/5580/img000005pn2.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Hairy Joe Bob on 05 Oct 2007, 05:59
What you looking at, eh? EH?

(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v134/212/105/509563357/n509563357_207236_2597.jpg)

Don't point at me!

(http://photos-357.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v134/212/105/509563357/n509563357_203462_5039.jpg)

I'm sorry! Don't hurt me!

(http://photos-314.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v77/44/41/559145314/n559145314_523762_7387.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Boro_Bandito on 05 Oct 2007, 09:15
You had it once, you wimp. Come back when you've chugged 3 cans in the space of an hour and a half.

Who's the wimp? on an average LAN party I'll take down 24 cans or a couple 3 liters in about 6 hours.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 05 Oct 2007, 09:42
Come back when you've drunk all the water.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 05 Oct 2007, 09:46
Eww.  Even thinking about that much soda is gross.

I've made coffee that can kill a man at a 100 yards.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pilsner on 05 Oct 2007, 10:20
and then bring him back from the dead
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 05 Oct 2007, 10:37
I make coffee with an ice cream scoop.

Wait, these aren't photos.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 05 Oct 2007, 11:40
Picturing...

I pretty much only dance when I am alone or at shows (where I'm pretty sure people are too busy dancing their own dance/listening to pay attention) because I'm convinced I look like a tool. My roommate is gone for the weekend, so I decided to set up my camera on video and find out. I was right.
(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v140/77/17/5739266/n5739266_36181210_1883.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 05 Oct 2007, 11:58
Manda, congrats on having my favourite painting ever on your wall!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 05 Oct 2007, 12:11
Rene Magritte is the man;)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Wink on 05 Oct 2007, 14:24
yeah good luck with this
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v51/shakinghandscut/72e8bc4d.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: onewheelwizzard on 05 Oct 2007, 14:26
I would pay 50$ for a Polaroid camera that could be guaranteed to take a picture that looked like that every time.  At least.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 05 Oct 2007, 14:28
I love Poloroids. They still haven't told anyone how those things work, though. Only they know. Fuckers.

Edit: oh, damn. New page. I need to go find a picture.

Okay, this is super old, but whatever. On the Balboa Island ferris wheel with my brother's best friend in February three or four years ago... hey, I still have that purse! That ride operator looks thrilled.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v249/dramajuana/Family/TyandI-1.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ImRonBurgundy? on 05 Oct 2007, 14:49
(http://photos-598.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v140/29/27/82300598/n82300598_30259874_6485.jpg)

MY WEB OF LIES.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 05 Oct 2007, 14:51
Wooo! Welcome back Ryan!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ally on 05 Oct 2007, 17:04
I would pay 50$ for a Polaroid camera that could be guaranteed to take a picture that looked like that every time.  At least.

When you are done with your picture, mush around the chemicals and it looks like that.

You owe me fifty bucks.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ImRonBurgundy? on 05 Oct 2007, 20:36
Wooo! Welcome back Ryan!

Hi, Tommy.
(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v108/77/80/1071060061/n1071060061_30046398_3402.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 05 Oct 2007, 23:32
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN7529.jpg)

We were lying in the middle of a street again. I love my little neighbor kids...they make the best pictures.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 06 Oct 2007, 17:26
Did someone mention Polaroids?
(http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q228/andlemonade/P3290595.jpg)



Also, I has a kitty.
(http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q228/andlemonade/P3290541.jpg)


And a skull.
(http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q228/andlemonade/P3290577.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Johnny C on 06 Oct 2007, 18:04
(http://photos-511.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sctm/v124/148/53/122100511/n122100511_30104787_564.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Maui on 06 Oct 2007, 18:21
Tim Hortons!! A+ Johnny.

I have pretty much decided that when i get a Sabres jersey, i'm going to get a Horton one.  Not because of his mad hockey skillz, oh no, but because of his delicious ice capps.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 06 Oct 2007, 20:26
Here is a pretty cool picture of me. I was in the woods for like 5 days. It was bad ass.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v209/Seanbateman/n1380840033_30111934_2945.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 06 Oct 2007, 20:27
And a skull.
(skull picy)
I like skulls :)
(http://img179.imageshack.us/img179/4891/skullswn9.png)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Simulacra on 06 Oct 2007, 21:14
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y105/Simulacra42/shaaave.jpg)

Guh. hangovers.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LiterSize on 06 Oct 2007, 21:38
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/Xtract/P6090017.jpg)




I found a book....
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 06 Oct 2007, 23:19
[pic]i am back mofos[/pix]

Guh. hangovers.


?

??????




Holy shit, guys.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 07 Oct 2007, 00:39
November 2006...was that before or after I joined?

I don't remember him at all...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 07 Oct 2007, 01:41
I joined around this time in '05 (oh holy FUCK that's a while ago) and I don't remember him, if it makes you feel better.

Let's keep him around though, because even though I'm totally straight, I think he's puuurdy.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 07 Oct 2007, 01:59
I remember him! Or his avatar, at least. And I think KimJongSick and I joined at around the same time.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 07 Oct 2007, 04:12
Guess who has a sexy brand new iMac sitting on her desk now? ME! And now for the obligatory Photo Booth photos!

(http://img341.imageshack.us/img341/407/photo1ry7.jpg)

(http://img266.imageshack.us/img266/1306/photo2ik7.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 07 Oct 2007, 05:15
Oh man, that shirt.
I wear that shirt sometimes, and it starts the strangest conversations with the most unexpected people.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 07 Oct 2007, 08:37
I remember Simulcara. I think he's the only other person on the forums that lives in Oklahoma.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 07 Oct 2007, 11:35
Yeah, we all remember Simulacra. Guy, Halloween is coming up. Dare to chance the Jack Skellington costume? Will it still fit? Do you even still have it?
At this rate, i'm going to be Ash J Williams again. Just like every other year...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 07 Oct 2007, 12:46
I don't know if I even have a Halloween party to go to, but if I do I'll probably just bring out last year's costume. It was a glorified toga, and I liked it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 07 Oct 2007, 16:16
Guess who is here.


(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v209/Seanbateman/Photo26-2.jpg)

Woo--oooo
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Cartilage Head on 07 Oct 2007, 16:30
 Are you muffling her screams of terror?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tyler on 07 Oct 2007, 16:35
He would never do that to her.




He's hand feeding her because her arms are bound.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 07 Oct 2007, 20:27
Yeah, we all remember Simulacra. Guy, Halloween is coming up. Dare to chance the Jack Skellington costume? Will it still fit? Do you even still have it?
At this rate, i'm going to be Ash J Williams again. Just like every other year...


Going in drag is always an option!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Simulacra on 07 Oct 2007, 21:06
Aw, the forum love.  kinda makes me feel all cold and crawly inside. :-D

SW- yes, we live like 3 miles apart... unless you've moved.

Sam- we met at the starbucks at which i work

Spinless- regrettably no, I have yet to find the enchanted artifact which will bring a fairy tale end to the skellington curse.  He stays in the closet.  However, for the uninitiated:

(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y105/Simulacra42/jackmask.jpg)

yup, still fits.

we shall soon see what this year's hallow's eve has in store MUWAHAHAHAHAHAH!!!!!!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Cartilage Head on 07 Oct 2007, 21:13
 That costume is in terrible fucking shape. Get a better one.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 07 Oct 2007, 21:35
How do you see?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Verergoca on 07 Oct 2007, 23:59
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2250/1512285533_3a332c873b.jpg?v=0)

Cape Reinga is windy!

(YEY, NZ IS AWESOME!!!!) (http://www.flickr.com/erikinoz)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 08 Oct 2007, 03:36
SW- yes, we live like 3 miles apart... unless you've moved.

I've moved out of the UCO dorms, I'm now in OKC off of May+Wilshire.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ImRonBurgundy? on 08 Oct 2007, 05:08
(http://photos-061.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sctm/v116/77/80/1071060061/n1071060061_30050095_927.jpg)
I drew myself a friend.
(http://photos-061.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sctm/v116/77/80/1071060061/n1071060061_30050094_565.jpg)
"WHAT'S BANGIN'," he says.  Feel free to tell him what is banging.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 08 Oct 2007, 05:26
Bungee-cord chairs are bangin
(http://photos-266.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sctm/v125/77/17/5739266/n5739266_36213343_9734.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 08 Oct 2007, 05:58
Beyond awesome.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 08 Oct 2007, 07:56
That chair seems like something that would be the death of me after a night of heavy drinking.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 08 Oct 2007, 10:56
To make it even better (worse?), it is a rocking chair.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 08 Oct 2007, 11:15
"I think I'll have a niiice sit.. HAUGH!"

"We're not sure how, but he's so tangled we're going to have to saw him apart to get him out of the chair. It might have something to do with this empty vodka bottle?"
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: koernel on 08 Oct 2007, 12:05
(http://images.lokalisten.de/photos/a-gal/2007/08/07/03/68905_1186443050203l.jpg)

Some kind of wedding party...

(http://images.lokalisten.de/photos/a/2007/05/09/32/341195_1178720653648l.jpg)

Now you get it  8-)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 08 Oct 2007, 16:27
Boo koernel, that's not very bangin!

Apple picking, however, will bang you up.
(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v140/235/25/5722401/n5722401_36212295_4910.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: sandysmilinstrange on 08 Oct 2007, 21:17
So apparently my friend (who is sadly off camera) said something I didn't like...

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v37/ceeingred/100_0120.jpg)

That is some hearty disapproval.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: cheesepie on 08 Oct 2007, 22:14
Sandy's a pretty lady

This is me at age 14
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v319/cheesepie/Longomg.jpg)

This is me now, at age 18
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v319/cheesepie/Boatcruise.jpg)

ch-ch-changeees
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 08 Oct 2007, 22:29
You look like a woman in the first picture.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: WriterofAllWrongs on 08 Oct 2007, 23:30
You look like a serial killer in your pictures.

Different strokes~
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: FruitKat on 09 Oct 2007, 00:49
So you all forgot my birthday thread and I turned 21 and everything... *sniffle sniffle*
I'm not bitter though because I baked tons and tons of cupcakes and had a picnic at the zoo with bubbles and animals and fun times!
Then I had a sugar rush and thats why my smile is so crazy...
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y135/starlightrecycler/katcupcake.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 09 Oct 2007, 02:31
Very pretty, Ms. Kat!

Incidentally, I recently got this message from Buzz Aldrin, who was the second man to walk on the moon -

Quote
Dear Forums,

Birthday threads are really lame. Recreate the experience by putting 'Happy Birthday' into Google Image Search. Seriously though, we're all facebook/myspace buddies and everyone can send PMs to everyone else. Let's all give Birthday threads a jolly, hearty 'Fuck You' for the next twenty years or so. Feel free to age privately in the comfort of your own home.

Lots of love,

Buzz Aldrin
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ZJGent on 09 Oct 2007, 04:38
You may call me Steed, John Steed.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/zeejay_djinn/umbrella.jpg)

En garde.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 09 Oct 2007, 04:41
Carry on.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 09 Oct 2007, 05:18
Wow, Kat, your hair at that length suits you amazingly well!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 09 Oct 2007, 07:40
You look like a serial killer in your pictures.

Different strokes~

Who the fuck are you?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 09 Oct 2007, 08:29
Aww did somebody stand up to Keiffer? Surely that's not allowed...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 09 Oct 2007, 09:08
People say 'fuck you' to Kieffer all the time, but they're usually too small to be noticed.

Drick, you're not John Steed unless you have the hat.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: FruitKat on 09 Oct 2007, 12:15
Very pretty, Ms. Kat!

Incidentally, I recently got this message from Buzz Aldrin, who was the second man to walk on the moon -

Quote
Dear Forums,

Birthday threads are really lame. Recreate the experience by putting 'Happy Birthday' into Google Image Search. Seriously though, we're all facebook/myspace buddies and everyone can send PMs to everyone else. Let's all give Birthday threads a jolly, hearty 'Fuck You' for the next twenty years or so. Feel free to age privately in the comfort of your own home.

Lots of love,

Buzz Aldrin

Yeah but I love how this happens when October rocks around. Throughout the rest of the year its all swish and swell and happy days. Suddenly my birthday happens and they're ewww annoying. CONSPIRACY!!!! YOU ALL HATE ME!

(pssst, please don't think I'm actually offended by this)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: cheesepie on 09 Oct 2007, 13:08
You look like a serial killer in your pictures.

Different strokes~

Who the fuck are you?

YEAH! WHO ARE YOU
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Cartilage Head on 09 Oct 2007, 13:46
 Kiff I think "Who the fuck are you" is a worn out catchphrase. Try "Shut up, cock-shelf."

 Edited for less yappy.

 ART
(http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c213/hey_there_fatty/HET002.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: WriterofAllWrongs on 09 Oct 2007, 18:46
Quote
Who the fuck are you?

A cock-shelf.

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 09 Oct 2007, 20:59
Hey so guys, my hair does those pin curl things pretty well.

(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/Hair%20Things/DSCF0011copy.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 09 Oct 2007, 22:48
So cute! If I wasn't such a lazy ass when it came to my hair, I would definitely try that:D
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 09 Oct 2007, 23:25
Well there is a reason I only did three rows of curls on the front of my head. The rest I just pulled back into a bun.


(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/Hair%20Things/DSCF0015copy.jpg)


If I have help next time I will do more.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: TopolinoBoy on 10 Oct 2007, 03:29
Hey so guys, my hair does those pin curl things pretty well.

(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/Hair%20Things/DSCF0011copy.jpg)

(http://www.faniq.com/images/blog/weird.jpg)

???
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 10 Oct 2007, 05:02
That's a horrible thing to say about Weird Al. (sorry Katie. Your hair looks really nice.)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 10 Oct 2007, 09:00
Aww did somebody stand up to Keiffer? Surely that's not allowed...

I'm strongly in favor of people standing up to me. But that was some random dude who I have never seen before calling me a serial killer? Because I made an observation about a different person? So I am slightly confused? At least a little? I guess?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 10 Oct 2007, 10:27
I think there's a possibility that he was referring to your avatar.

That is a scary picture of you for sure, Kieffer. It looks like the photo has been cropped so people can't see you abusing a child.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 10 Oct 2007, 10:54
Ironically, I am abusing a child.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 10 Oct 2007, 10:55
Dear Daniel
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v631/kauhornz/l_ad02e2321410be08ccf1a01bf705116d.jpg)
Just stop and think of all the people you are hurting.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: WriterofAllWrongs on 10 Oct 2007, 11:02
Quote
I'm strongly in favor of people standing up to me. But that was some random dude who I have never seen before calling me a serial killer? Because I made an observation about a different person? So I am slightly confused? At least a little? I guess?

Just playing around, really.  I didn't mean for any disruption to occur, I was being witty.

JOKES!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 10 Oct 2007, 11:27
epic sexy pic

Geez, you gotta run all of us down by reminding us that we're totally screwed romantically?
Fuck you... or maybe you can get that lady to do it for you. Asshole.


 :-P
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: magnanimusman on 10 Oct 2007, 11:48
(http://photos-229.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v47/51/7/505229/n505229_30470157_9292.jpg)

=

(http://shop.medeco.com/images/LT-922060.jpg)

=

awsome
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 10 Oct 2007, 12:28
Quote
I'm strongly in favor of people standing up to me. But that was some random dude who I have never seen before calling me a serial killer? Because I made an observation about a different person? So I am slightly confused? At least a little? I guess?

Just playing around, really.  I didn't mean for any disruption to occur, I was being witty.

JOKES!

If that's what passes for wit these days, then I am incredibly distressed at the state of the world.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SusurrusIgnoramus on 10 Oct 2007, 13:04
why are we still talking about this again?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 10 Oct 2007, 15:00
The real question is, what does the lady in Dan's pic think of being on the internets?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 10 Oct 2007, 15:22
Also, how old is the photo? It has that grainy scanned-photo-from-college feel, but Dan's hair/facial hair is now indistinguishable from College-Dan again...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: thegreatbuddha on 10 Oct 2007, 16:16
The shirts in the picture have 2007 on them.  So, fairly recently?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 10 Oct 2007, 16:29
You can't just assume time travel is impossible, or that the photo isn't from 1995 and it just trying to confuse us. That's bad science!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 10 Oct 2007, 16:53
We're just going to have to wait and see if Dan breaks his silence.

Also, Kieffer, WriterofAllWrongs, if you're going to continue your conversation please do so via P.M.s or email or somesuch, as I think it's reached the stage where it's between the two of you only and I suspect that everyone else would like to get on with the photo thread, if only to find out A) why Dan is blowing a raspberry on Nicole Kidman's belly, and B) what Keith Urban thinks of the whole thing. Thankyou!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 10 Oct 2007, 17:52
dan is successfully making me jealous of his weekend.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 10 Oct 2007, 19:26
Photo Booth picture!
(http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/8412/photo8sk0.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: onewheelwizzard on 10 Oct 2007, 19:33
I don't know if I've ever seen a man look more laid in my life.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 10 Oct 2007, 20:16
I don't know if I've ever seen a man look more tired, hungover, and in need of a coffee in my life.

I fell asleep in that booth two or three times in the course of the Pats game.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: teh_Shannon on 10 Oct 2007, 20:32
(http://i22.photobucket.com/albums/b305/Shannon_is_amazing/Random/whatswrongwithyourface.jpg)

Whats wrong with your face?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 10 Oct 2007, 20:51
Photo Booth picture!

I was confused for a moment there. I was thinking "How did you fit your entire bedroom inside a photo-booth?"
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 10 Oct 2007, 21:43
Obviously, it's a Gallifreyan photo booth.

Duh.  :roll:
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 10 Oct 2007, 22:23
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN7823.jpg)

Yay for...eyeliner! I was tired...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ImRonBurgundy? on 10 Oct 2007, 23:56
You appear to have turned your back on your doppelgnger.  Big mistake.

But anyway...
(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v71/29/27/82300598/n82300598_30196656_6158.jpg)
Get foxy with me, baby, and I'll give you a discount on a '74 Gremlin.  Whaddya say, sweet cheeks?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 11 Oct 2007, 01:39
Oh god, Ryan, I missed you.

o/
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 11 Oct 2007, 05:09
Why is that not posted in katie's timewarp thread?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 11 Oct 2007, 11:06
(http://img129.imageshack.us/img129/6186/1001010ps3.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 11 Oct 2007, 13:42
Oi oi
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 11 Oct 2007, 16:42
Why is that not posted in katie's timewarp thread?


Because that thread is unnecessary?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 11 Oct 2007, 16:47
that was unnecessary.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Wink on 11 Oct 2007, 18:06
something is unnecessary
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 11 Oct 2007, 18:21
I'll tell you what's not unnecessary.

Your mom.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 11 Oct 2007, 18:29
That's not what you were saying last night...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 11 Oct 2007, 21:24
I just want to know what constitutes "necessary" in an off-topic forum.



Edit for photo.

(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/DSCF0036.jpg)

This is my most recent sari purchase. I figured since I was already playing dress up because of my hair, I would do this too. I think I messed up the drape, though. Note too that I have to make a new choli to go with.


Edit Edit: Dude Harry I was busy uploading. Geeeez.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 11 Oct 2007, 21:31
In this thread? I'd say a few photos would be necessary right about now . . .
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Wink on 11 Oct 2007, 21:41
this is why we made him moderator

(http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc1/morewinks/1230743c.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: David_Dovey on 11 Oct 2007, 22:30
Photo Booth picture!

<peeeeenk top!>

How do you get your Photo Booth pics to not look like grainy crap?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: quietnow on 11 Oct 2007, 22:42
NEEDS MOAR KARI

(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa59/solidbeat/Self%20Portraiture/IMGP0601.jpg)
(http://i198.photobucket.com/albums/aa59/solidbeat/Self%20Portraiture/IMGP0609.jpg)



[*EDIT* to say DAYUM RODDY, your most recent photo is TOASTY]
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 12 Oct 2007, 00:09
Kari, I don't think I can hang out this weekend! I have a midterm.

Can we reschedule plz?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: cheesepie on 12 Oct 2007, 00:51
I'm the guy with the long hair who now has short hair, remember? Here's a Hippo in Ukraine:

(http://profile.ak.facebook.com/profile6/1289/3/n90408773_890.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 12 Oct 2007, 01:21
kari i enjoy the eyewear!

on the way to hardly strictly bluegrass in sf.

(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v143/74/73/628327064/n628327064_348635_9714.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 12 Oct 2007, 02:08
I'm always glad to see the back of you, Cathy.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 12 Oct 2007, 04:23
phot

Where is this? I must live there.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Wink on 12 Oct 2007, 10:48
phot

Where is this? I must live there.

yeah it's pretty awesome

(http://i213.photobucket.com/albums/cc1/morewinks/d9914483.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 12 Oct 2007, 10:51
Your posts are increasing my aggrivation that I can't get home from school to get my polaroid until next weekend:( Love the scenery though! The colors remind me of pictures of my parents when they were young and interesting in Alaska.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ZJGent on 12 Oct 2007, 23:09
DAYUM RODDY

Number #73 of things that make hot girls look hotter - super plastic frame specs.
Number #49 - tattoos.
Number #26 - semi-serious pouting.

Damn you kari! Why do you taunt me so!
(Also did you mean toasty as in warm temperature or toasty as in Rojo Caliente?)

PICTURE! KIND OF OLD! GOOFY SMILE!
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/zeejay_djinn/CIMG6465.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: David_Dovey on 12 Oct 2007, 23:13
Drick, you are the Niels Bohr of knowing what makes girls hawt.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ZJGent on 12 Oct 2007, 23:35
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/zeejay_djinn/bohr.png)

where:
Ze = Ze Attractive Lady, Non?
n = Level of hotness
1 = Maximum hotness, aided by all possible items on list of what makes hot girls hotter.
2 = Medium hotness, utilising a wide range of items on list, but not all.
3 = Base hotness... man, this girl is going to have to have some good starting out hotness with no items. sometimes this can pulled off though, when the factor of Wench Sexiness (W/S) is combined with the diagram.

The wiggly red arrow indicates the hotness affecting manly men and lesbians in the surrounding area.
The writing below it is just there to make me look clever. It is something to do with french knickers.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 12 Oct 2007, 23:47
I just got this picture from the summer. You can't see me very well, but I think it is an awesome shot from an ultimate frisbee match. I am the bald one on the right making the awesome catch while being charged down. Yeah.
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e66/jgcrawfo/n122604238_34096143_8198.jpg)

And I appear to have only one leg. I am one-legged frisbee machine and I am still better than you!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 13 Oct 2007, 12:16
Okay, guys, I need some advice.

I'm consider a slight adjustment to my look. Ie. replacing my beloved sideburns with a beard.

so far it looks like this:

(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/Mosag/Foto116.jpg)

I am also cutting my hair tomorrow, to make it look like this:

(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/Mosag/Foto14.jpg)

So now, any suggestions about my facial hair are welcomed.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mooface on 13 Oct 2007, 12:19
i miss the sideburns!!!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 13 Oct 2007, 12:29
So far i can still return to them with ease, so no prob there.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 13 Oct 2007, 14:52
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/l_6c50c564474faa3ab534ea12e631aa8b.jpg)

Hockey starts soon.I burned my tongue on my mouth guard...it said

'FOLLOW INSTRUCTIONS CAREFULLY" boil in water for 90 seconds, take out of water, put under cold tap for 1 second, put in mouth and bite down for 30 seconds'.

 Well, I followed carefully. AND THE DAMN THING WAS STILL HOT AFTER 1 SECOND UNDER COLD WATER! this is what I get for following instructions.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Wink on 13 Oct 2007, 15:24
oooh yo play hockey? i want to make out with you wearing it

yeah
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 13 Oct 2007, 16:17
Aye. This officially makes you one of the top awesome people I know, in real life or otherwise.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: thegreatbuddha on 13 Oct 2007, 19:55
Okay, guys, I need some advice.

I'm consider a slight adjustment to my look. Ie. replacing my beloved sideburns with a beard.

so far it looks like this:

picshur

I am also cutting my hair tomorrow, to make it look like this:

picshur

So now, any suggestions about my facial hair are welcomed.

Grow a Kilmister.  9 out of 10 scientists agree, its the best facialhair ever.

(http://img296.imageshack.us/img296/1066/coeur07kt1.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Chrasstor on 13 Oct 2007, 20:01
Lummer, imo grow a badass Monopolystache. You know the one.


(http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/2056/picture087ci8.jpg)
Hair, it's grow time!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 14 Oct 2007, 01:52
Aye. This officially makes you one of the top awesome people I know, in real life or otherwise.

Oh boy! The sad part about girls hockey though...no checking. Though we just had one of our guy players partially paralyzed from an illegal back check. Not good at all. And uh...Wink...uh...you scare me just a teeny tiny bit.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 14 Oct 2007, 06:12
Wink, rule number 4 is 'do not be a creepy jerk.' That's not to say you can't call RWS cute or say you think makeouts with a mouthguard would be hot, but try to refrain from telling people that you want to do intimate things with them.

RWS you are cute and hockey is awesome!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: est on 14 Oct 2007, 06:17
Please stop being a creepy jerk Wink
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 14 Oct 2007, 15:53
(http://photos-978.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v142/131/27/541326978/n541326978_354301_2817.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Chrasstor on 14 Oct 2007, 16:29
Wow Ruyi, what kind of camera do you own, and how much did it cost?


(http://img144.imageshack.us/img144/4316/picture105uf4.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 14 Oct 2007, 16:41
(ruyi's picture)

As Ruyi found to her cost, a student budget doesn't stretch very far.

No need to quote the actual picture when it's so close by. Thankyou! - Inlander
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 14 Oct 2007, 17:41
Chrasstor, you always look stunned in your pictures. Why is that?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Chrasstor on 14 Oct 2007, 18:46
Hmm... I'm not sure XD

I guess I'm just not super photogenic or something. The camera flash is startling, and I'm not a super enthusiastic person by nature.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: KTkat on 14 Oct 2007, 20:18
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a361/KikkiTehCameraWhore/100_0318.jpg)

This is what happens when I'm bored.

Ruyi: I like the flowers!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 15 Oct 2007, 05:57
Because people talk too much in the picture thread. That is why.
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2161/1502622709_27060c2044_m.jpg)
I'm going to sleep.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Aimless on 15 Oct 2007, 06:13
(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v105/39/53/758710472/n758710472_1507842_4953.jpg)
(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v105/39/53/758710472/n758710472_1508024_8432.jpg)
(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v105/39/53/758710472/n758710472_1508102_5203.jpg)

New pics at last! From one of my most fun nights out in god knows how long :) the paper thing is a rose I made out of a napkin, and it looked a lot better at the time. Not sure why it looks so huge in the pic!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: sandysmilinstrange on 15 Oct 2007, 12:32
Guys, Crayola named a product line after me. I feel so special.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v37/ceeingred/100_0160.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 15 Oct 2007, 13:11
You're new? I thought I'd seen you before.

I'm doing it wrong.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 15 Oct 2007, 15:54
Hey, QC! I got more face-metal! My piercer's the most adorable girl ever, she makes the pain worth it.
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Skibas_clavicle/lip1.jpg)

Different angle:
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Skibas_clavicle/lip2.jpg)

PS: I'm totally wearing Emilio's scarf <3
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 15 Oct 2007, 16:21
I see! It looks good. The scarf I mean.The hunk of metal too I guess. But 'specially the scarf.
(http://img132.imageshack.us/img132/4272/picture331sg9.jpg)

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 15 Oct 2007, 16:52
I like the hunks of metal. I keep saying I will get bits of metal put in my face, then chickening out. Once I made it to the piercing parlour but the guy who did septums was on holiday. I am not sure if this is good or bad.
(Julia you are beautiful!)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 15 Oct 2007, 17:10
Curls!

(http://img402.imageshack.us/img402/1742/pa120014vj3.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Aimless on 15 Oct 2007, 17:19
there are two things I find prettier than almost anything on a lady, one is short hair and the other... big curls. awesome!!

lunchy my first thought was "omg no no no!!" but now that i've had some time to think about it i realise you'd look totally excellent with a piercing or two. like esp through an eyebrow!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Chrasstor on 15 Oct 2007, 17:42
Yeah, I used to be generally against all piercings save ear piercings... But, I'm starting to soften up on MOST facial piercings... They can look very cute, so long as they aren't crazy metal-core piercings.

Bottom lip, underlip and nose piercings are all cute. I think lunchy would look best with a nose-piercing!

(http://img513.imageshack.us/img513/638/picture107kv1.jpg)
Also, me trying to look more enthused, and less stunned for RWS :- P

Ack, forgot to mention. The curls look very pretty Princy!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: E. Spaceman on 15 Oct 2007, 18:13
scarves made for QC people: 7
scarves i own: 0
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 15 Oct 2007, 18:19
[EDITED FOR WOAH]

I got my dad's old polaroid camera! Hours of fun!
(http://photos-266.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v140/77/17/5739266/n5739266_36294233_7211.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 15 Oct 2007, 18:29
Julia Bee that is exactly precisely what I want. Except I think my mouth would explode into blood and exposed nerve endings if I actually got a hole poked into it. :(
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 15 Oct 2007, 18:42
That's what she said! *buh dum tshhhh*
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 15 Oct 2007, 20:03
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN7991.jpg)

To go along with my helmet, I have gear!

Yeah...it looks like I gained a couple pounds...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 15 Oct 2007, 21:06
Myyyyy girlfriend is so pretttyyyy.


Also Lunchy if you get a facial piercing don't get anything so cliche as an eyebrow, please.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 15 Oct 2007, 22:44
I'm going to post several photos, because I am back from holidays with spiffy new hair!  my best friend and I took a 10 hour road trip to stay with my parents for a week way out west.  It was relaxing.
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0801.jpg)
Here we are going out for dinner on our second night there
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0813.jpg)
here we are back from going out again some time in the middle of the week
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0830.jpg)
My awesome new hair!
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0805.jpg)
Still my hair!
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0822.jpg)
We are rocking out or something.

Im back guys hi!

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 16 Oct 2007, 08:10
Some friends and I leaving Six Flags Sunday night. The camera's shutter speed fucked up somehow, but I like the ghost effect.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Six%20Flags/PA140008.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 16 Oct 2007, 08:15
G-G-G-GHOSTS!!!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 16 Oct 2007, 10:22
(http://www.tvacres.com/images/ghostbusters_small1.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 2.0 on 16 Oct 2007, 10:54
Me in my work outfit.  Notice the shirt.  And don't use flash on someone when holding acid.
(http://inlinethumb10.webshots.com/24841/2319794190100264440S500x500Q85.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 16 Oct 2007, 11:07
ebony_willow, your hair is wonderful.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 16 Oct 2007, 11:12
This is what happens when I'm bored.

Since nobody else is saying it, I'll just say that I think you're really cute.

Right, moving on!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 16 Oct 2007, 11:18
This is what happens when I'm bored.

Since nobody else is saying it, I'll just say that I think you're really cute.

Right, moving on!
(quote tunnels)

I didn't even see her picture. My internet is so slow lately sometimes pictures don't load at all. But, I agree!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 16 Oct 2007, 11:27
(http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/8445/me1uj7.jpg)

(http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/1908/me2zo0.jpg)

Two pretty decent pictures I took of myself.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 16 Oct 2007, 12:56
Keep the stubble, it should be attractive to people. If it isn't, then they are clearly our robot overlords.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 16 Oct 2007, 16:29
ebony_willow, your hair is wonderful.

I knew I could count on you blind double date buddy haha
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 16 Oct 2007, 20:11
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v209/Seanbateman/Photo28-1.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pilsner on 16 Oct 2007, 22:42
(http://img526.imageshack.us/img526/8445/me1uj7.jpg)

So . . . what are your opinions on merlot?

[img width= height=]http://www.vh1.com/sitewide/flipbooks/img/movies/people/g/giamatti_paul/51301280_10.jpg[/img]
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: BrittanyMarie on 16 Oct 2007, 22:47
I thought Paul Giamotti was Dave Matthews for a split second, and my only thought was YOU ASSHOLE!

Julia, I have to ask-that's a regular labret, right? I've been thinking about getting a vertical one but haven't sucked it up enough to actually go.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: valley_parade on 17 Oct 2007, 04:10
(http://i61.photobucket.com/albums/h76/captain_applesauce/101607_20531.jpg)

So I met the guitar player from my favorite band last night. We were both pretty pumped but decided "HEY SERIOUS PICTURE".
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ImRonBurgundy? on 17 Oct 2007, 04:17
Is that Chris McCaughan?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: valley_parade on 17 Oct 2007, 04:55
Indeed it is.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SusurrusIgnoramus on 17 Oct 2007, 06:58
So . . . what are your opinions on merlot?

IF ANYBODY ORDERS MERLOT, I'M LEAVING!!!!!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 17 Oct 2007, 07:22
I am not drinking any fucking merlot!!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 17 Oct 2007, 07:41
There is actually a really amusing bit of historical back story about california wine country and Merlot grapes that makes that scene much much funnier.

Or at least it makes it make sense.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 17 Oct 2007, 08:15
Kiff, your avatar photo is terrifyingly mesmerizing
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SusurrusIgnoramus on 17 Oct 2007, 08:45
There is actually a really amusing bit of historical back story about california wine country and Merlot grapes that makes that scene much much funnier.

Or at least it makes it make sense.

care to share?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 17 Oct 2007, 10:30
When wine grapes first started being grown in California, a lot of the major companies found out that they could grow Merlot grapes fairly quickly, and have them still be decent, and they wouldn't have to spend nearly as long waiting for the vines to mature as they would if they were growing Cab Sauv or Melbeck or the like. So within about 3 years, there was a huge flood of merlot on the market, and it was kind of looked at by wine people as a joke wine, since there was so much and it had all been run off so quickly and so easily. The stereotype has stuck, since Merlot is still incredibly easy to grow quickly and make an "okay" wine out of, and as a result California Merlot is kind of looked down on among wine snobs.

Also a picture I guess.


(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v209/Seanbateman/Photo31.jpg)

Y/N on piercing potentially?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Boro_Bandito on 17 Oct 2007, 10:36
I'm a fan of the spider bite going on one side or the other, don't like it in the middle like that. Symmetry is for squares, or circles, or starfish and various other objects and forms of life.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SusurrusIgnoramus on 17 Oct 2007, 10:41
Symmetry is for squares.

yeah, stop bein' so L7.  haha!

/cheese.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 17 Oct 2007, 10:42
Hey man, don't front, humans are bilaterally symmetrical, just like those piercings. I give it a yay.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Chrasstor on 17 Oct 2007, 10:45
I'm gonna have to agree with Boro. In my opinion, lip piercings look better to the side a bit. Something like this would look pretty sharp, I think.
(http://www.happynews.com/living/bodyart/care-lip-piercing.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 17 Oct 2007, 10:46
I'm a fan of the spider bite going on one side or the other, don't like it in the middle like that. Symmetry is for squares, or circles, or starfish and various other objects and forms of life.

The entire definition of human beauty according to the golden ratio is based upon symmetry. Plus the side is so cliche.


Chrassator or whatever, you're the guy who thinks eyebrow piercings look good.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Boro_Bandito on 17 Oct 2007, 10:51
well I meant get the full spider bite on the side, so both of them on the same side.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Chrasstor on 17 Oct 2007, 11:01
Just for the record, I'm pretty much against all piercings sans lip/tongue/nose/ears.

The symmetric spider bite looks good, it's just that it gives a kinda metal/punk vibe(at least to me). The thing about a standard nose/lip/tongue piercing is that it doesn't make much of a statement at all.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 17 Oct 2007, 11:07
Yeah because what we should all strive for in piercings is to looks just like everyone else.

Also, less yappy more pictures of me holding kitties before I got my hair cut off.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v209/Seanbateman/n1278781138_30332133_9065.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 17 Oct 2007, 11:08
If you guys dont shut up and post more pictures soon, I'll be forced to eat your souls:
(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v140/159/35/694070516/n694070516_1416920_4936.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 17 Oct 2007, 11:15
Jesus christ your pupils are dilated, Julia.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 17 Oct 2007, 11:16
Plus the side is so cliche.

To be fair, facial piercings in general are entirely cliche at this point and either one is going to be conforming to noncomformity. I'd avoid picking one over the other for the sake of not following the pack as the second you get any facial piercing, you've pretty much applied for a Hot Topic frequent shoppers' card. Just go with whichever one you like the look of more yourself or whichever one women seem to like more in general as it's going to be a pain in the ass to care for either one and they're the ones that will be looking at you and creaming their jeans or vomitting in their mouth, dependant on their preference.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 17 Oct 2007, 12:22
julia nice hair color!

kieffer if you pierce it that way it will complement julia's, i think?

also sorry to be uninteresting but

(http://photos-978.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v142/131/27/541326978/n541326978_354328_44.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 17 Oct 2007, 15:35
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e66/jgcrawfo/DRAMATIC.jpg)
I am standing in a field, wearing a brown suit and a colourful scarf. I am serene.

Kieffer, good call.

Julia, that is extra creepy combined with the eat your soul comment, because your outer shirt is coloured comparably to the other guy's shirt, meaning you look kind of like a disembodied soul-eater at first glance.

Ruyi I miss the days when you were a wholesome young girl. Now you are all 'trespassing' and 'vandalizing signs'. What happened?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 17 Oct 2007, 16:58
James' first words were, 'watch and learn, people.'
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 17 Oct 2007, 17:46
As a followup to my responses about piercings, I do have some experience with them. Exhibit A, Jonathan at age 20:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/IM000953.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Wild_Weasel87 on 17 Oct 2007, 19:42
(http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa248/w119alt/n39514703_31890839_2323.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: thegreatbuddha on 17 Oct 2007, 19:45
< a href="http://photobucket.com" target="_blank">< img src="http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa248/w119alt/n39514703_31890839_2323.jpg" border="0" alt="Photo Sharing and Video Hosting at Photobucket">< /a>

just use [ img] [ /img] tags.  I for one can't see pics when you use html.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Katherine on 17 Oct 2007, 19:48
(http://lh6.google.com/lotsacats/Rxa7nMTnQVI/AAAAAAAAAzo/kE26Z9ela9E/Oct%202007%20028.jpg?imgmax=640)

Not sure if this is going to work but if so, this is the latest picture of me, taken this past weekend.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: thegreatbuddha on 17 Oct 2007, 19:51
You look very much like my ex-sister-in-law,only younger.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: sandysmilinstrange on 17 Oct 2007, 21:17
Sort of old, but I don't think I ever posted it here.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v37/ceeingred/621390-R1-01-1A_002.jpg)

I wasn't ready to leave Boston and go back to the daycare yet.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 18 Oct 2007, 00:55
I made my hair shorter:

(http://www.inlisub.com/assets/Haircut.JPG)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Gryff on 18 Oct 2007, 05:09
HOLY SHIT RUYI YOUR HAIR

Also James, your getup there is way cool.

...

I don't have any real recent photos, but here's one you may not have seen that's not too old:

(http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c278/gazmund/muffin1.jpg)

Remember me, guys?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 18 Oct 2007, 07:38
I love you, Gryff. Don't ever leave us, again. Also, gimme a muffin.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 2.0 on 18 Oct 2007, 07:38
Melbeck

Malbec. There, i said it. And i've never even been to argentina.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Joseph on 18 Oct 2007, 12:19
A friend recently sent me a picture.  It's a few months old, but I really like it, so up here it goes!

(http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v135/146/79/694510065/n694510065_1396281_311.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 18 Oct 2007, 12:30
That is one of the cutest pictures I have ever seen. 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Boro_Bandito on 18 Oct 2007, 19:29
http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y110/Wildkyn/newglassesphil004.jpg

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y110/Wildkyn/newglassesphil008.jpg

new glasses, bad pictures, still manage to look good.

Edit: wow, I'm sorry, didn't realize how effing big those pictures are, I'll just link them
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 18 Oct 2007, 20:11
This is from a dance.

(http://pretentiousgamer.com/photos/what.jpg)

During this dance, I became the Star Child.

(http://pretentiousgamer.com/photos/starchild.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: made from ribs on 18 Oct 2007, 21:20
(http://i23.tinypic.com/8z33mg.png)
oregon coast.
freeze your ass off, FOR FREE! :D

OH WELL. it was pretty and sun setty.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 18 Oct 2007, 22:40
(http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q228/andlemonade/P4110704.jpg)

I bought some fishnets today.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Verergoca on 19 Oct 2007, 00:05
(http://i33.photobucket.com/albums/d79/Verergoca/Photos/Me/S5001807.jpg)

MORNING!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 19 Oct 2007, 01:56
hee hee Erik hairs is funnay hee hee
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: normz on 19 Oct 2007, 03:44
well on the topic of hair i was very proud of my awesome up-do skills for a cocktail party on the weekend

(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y94/normz/13-10-07_1959.jpg)

(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y94/normz/13-10-07_2001.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 19 Oct 2007, 04:25
Dang why did I not bring the connecty cable so I could show you guys my new hair also?
Because I am silly, that is why.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 19 Oct 2007, 05:54
Normz, your dress looks really nice, as does your hair - I just fail at doing things like that with mine, I can never get it to look right.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 19 Oct 2007, 07:49
Wait...

You mean to say there's hair and a dress in that picture?  :?  All I can see are...














Cheekbones  :lol:
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Cartilage Head on 19 Oct 2007, 08:49
LOL GOOD ONE
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 19 Oct 2007, 10:31
(http://images.rottentomatoes.com/images/movie/gallery/1156562/photo_04.jpg)

Snikt, bub?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 19 Oct 2007, 12:06
(http://a808.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/9/l_8603f4fbfbea1ac9c5dbc2010fe272f7.jpg)

No, that would be me...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Simulacra on 19 Oct 2007, 14:51
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y105/Simulacra42/Photo00681jpg.jpg)

long day at work yesterday
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 19 Oct 2007, 15:27
Drunk Jon!:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PA180001.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PA180003.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: KTkat on 19 Oct 2007, 21:23
normz, I am jealous of your amazing hair-styling ability. It looks awesome.

Storm Rider and Something Witty: Thank you! I just noticed the comments. *Self-esteem +5*

I just remembered this. Hooray for the fun spinny thing at the park by my house (last summer, before I cut and dyed my hair).
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a361/KikkiTehCameraWhore/spinnything.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 20 Oct 2007, 11:58
CAMERAPHOOOOONES


(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/10-19-07_1656.jpg)


The only problem with this picture otherwise is that there are far too few rhinestones.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 20 Oct 2007, 12:30
Is that Leon?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Katherine on 20 Oct 2007, 14:32
(http://lh3.google.com/lotsacats/RxotocTnQ3I/AAAAAAAAA8s/_cVe5gPxLfA/The%20Great%20Pumpkin%20Fiasco%20of%202007%20033.jpg?imgmax=512)
I know I just posted a picture a few days ago but I'm pretty darn proud of my pumpkin carving skills here.  First pumpkin I've carved in... a really long time.  I feel old now.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 20 Oct 2007, 15:18
I know I just posted a picture a few days ago
huh, why are you apologizing for this?

*looks for the rule against posting multiple pictures in the same week*

EDIT: btw, great pumpkin!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: celticgeek on 20 Oct 2007, 22:13
Great pumpkin carving. 

And post away!!!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 21 Oct 2007, 00:17
Is that Leon?

He has a severely hot ass!



Yes.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: The extra letter on 21 Oct 2007, 08:06
I managed to find a photo of yours truly on a backup CD I made about 3 years ago.

I must've been like, really happy to be using the camera or something.

(http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/2245/zedrp0.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: est on 21 Oct 2007, 08:17
Please note: he doesn't look anywhere near as creepy in real life.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 21 Oct 2007, 08:27
Hey there!

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/jimmy5times/1669583822_f0f2135f43.jpg)

I am genuinely amused

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/jimmy5times/1669561656_68f1208621.jpg)

I'd post other photos of the birthday festivities but I'm not really in any of them.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Joseph on 21 Oct 2007, 12:46
(http://www.geocities.com/zimo_and_bing/AphexTwin.jpg)

?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 21 Oct 2007, 16:51
I found a picture of Matt and I from 2002!
Let's tick off the boxes:

Braces: Check
Natural Hair Colour: Check
What's Left of a Dodgy Perm: Check
Lack of Makeup Skills: Check
Unwaxed Eyebrows: Check
Teeny Boobies: Check
Bad Fashion Sense: Check

I wonder what Matt saw in me. Huh.

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2122/1680442490_96bf52f378.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: The extra letter on 21 Oct 2007, 17:17
(http://www.geocities.com/zimo_and_bing/AphexTwin.jpg)

?
Who's that?

Edit:

Wait, cancel that, I just looked at the file name
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 21 Oct 2007, 21:17
Lunchy dear, mayhap you're not looking at him in that picture. I think you both have aged well.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 22 Oct 2007, 03:50
Pictures of people during the "lol awkward" phase of growth and development are always unpleasant to the person in the picture. Here's a photo of me in late '04 and I look pretty terrible.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/leadhindenburg/WTFmorningshot.jpg)

For comparison, me just after a hike about a month ago. Pardon the general filth:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/leadhindenburg/l_e42515e90c1793e0530403dcd33949f1.jpg)

U C WUT I SAYIN? Oh wait I still look like a tit. Whatever. Least my shirt's more awesome now.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 22 Oct 2007, 11:14
This is the cyanotype couples theme!
(http://photos-266.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v140/77/17/5739266/n5739266_36364798_634.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 22 Oct 2007, 14:34
I know I just posted a picture a few days ago
Great pumpkin!

(http://img134.imageshack.us/img134/2504/securityblanketbf5.th.jpg) (http://img134.imageshack.us/my.php?image=securityblanketbf5.jpg)

It is a VERY SOFT blanket.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ZJGent on 22 Oct 2007, 15:27
at the risk of cross-posting...

I ARE SERIOUS FRENCHMAN.

THIS IS SERIOUS THREAD. (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/zeejay_djinn/n503654575_220667_3681.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: KTkat on 22 Oct 2007, 20:02
Hooray for soft blankets!

P.S. *cough*pictures in the NYC thread*cough*
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Blue Kitty on 22 Oct 2007, 20:34
I forgot how much I love my Central hoodie
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a372/The_Blue_Kitty/favoritehoodie.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 22 Oct 2007, 20:49
My first tattoo!  It's a shark.  My digital camera is broken, so I hoisted my foot up onto the table so I could take a picture with the iMac.   It's not a great picture, but it's the only one I have at this point.

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b131/sutekitatakai/MyPicture-14.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 22 Oct 2007, 21:09
Why did you get a shark tattooed on your foot?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: sandysmilinstrange on 22 Oct 2007, 21:12
I've missed the rain. A lot.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v37/ceeingred/100_0228.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 22 Oct 2007, 21:13
<3
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 22 Oct 2007, 21:20
SW:  It's right below the ankle, and I got it because I'm a budding marine biologist specializing in sharks.  I like the placement. 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 23 Oct 2007, 00:51
SW:  It's right below the ankle, and I got it because I'm a budding marine biologist specializing in sharks.  I like the placement. 


I'm a budding marine biologist specializing in sharks


I'm a budding marine biologist 


budding


ANKLE



iuhp;kls5y84759woitfdgij0q24pwerotihjf_ojknrigojknygfijktnerigjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 23 Oct 2007, 01:06
I just can not get enough of posting pictures from this photo-shoot.
(http://i37.photobucket.com/albums/e66/jgcrawfo/n122602645_34141581_3393.jpg)

And would you too just meet up and get a room already? Really, I'd chip in for your airfare or whatever.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 2.0 on 23 Oct 2007, 07:07
SW:  It's right below the ankle, and I got it because I'm a budding marine biologist specializing in sharks.  I like the placement. 


I'm a budding marine biologist specializing in sharks


I'm a budding marine biologist 


budding


ANKLE



iuhp;kls5y84759woitfdgij0q24pwerotihjf_ojknrigojknygfijktnerigjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjjj

I was once a budding biologist. Then i graduated and looked at it right in the face.  She bitchslapped me until i cried.  So i do "biology" by working on bugs.  The rest is just chemistry. 

Picture.

(http://inlinethumb54.webshots.com/24437/2143087560100264440S500x500Q85.jpg)

I'm a eeeeeting yoooooooou
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 23 Oct 2007, 09:43
New dress! My cousin is getting married on the 3rd, and I needed something in that weird wedding semi-formality-but-still-danceable range.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v352/redglasscurls/Narcissism/detail.jpg?t=1193157581)

EDIT: I look kind of angry here, but you can't see the length in the other photo
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v352/redglasscurls/Narcissism/kindaangryfull.jpg?t=1193157576)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 23 Oct 2007, 10:05
Oh my (compliment!).
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 23 Oct 2007, 10:42
Manda, that dress is lovely. Well done.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: CmonMiracle on 23 Oct 2007, 11:38
Manda, where'd you get that dress?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 23 Oct 2007, 12:21
New dress! My cousin is getting married on the 3rd, and I needed something in that weird wedding semi-formality-but-still-danceable range.

At first I read this as you were getting married, and you wanted that to be a wedding dress...

Anyways its nice.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 23 Oct 2007, 12:37
Slick's fedora,

Also man if you are paying fuck yes. I am packing my stuff now.




MEANWHILE

(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/Photo116.jpg)


MY MAILBOX MAKES ME A HAPPY CAMPER


(http://i13.photobucket.com/albums/a300/calenlass/Photo117.jpg)

(That came in the mail yesterday.)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 23 Oct 2007, 12:48
,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 23 Oct 2007, 13:38
Young lady, you cover up that bum right now before you cause a traffic accident.

Thanks for the dress compliments! It's from this sweet indian boutique in Laurel MD
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 23 Oct 2007, 13:52
Jesus Christ!

Speaking of awesome shit coming in the mail, when it gets to be a decent hour (read: not 11pm) I'll post pictarz of my AWESOME ALL-WOOL SWEATERVEST that came in from eBay today. $15 including shipping, shit yessssss
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Orbert on 23 Oct 2007, 14:56
Quote from: redglasscurls
Thanks for the dress compliments! It's from this sweet indian boutique in Laurel MD

Yay! I used to live in Laurel, MD. I worked in Silver Spring and took classes out at UMd. Route 1 could take you anywhere.

That's a beautiful dress, and you of course look lovely as always.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Catfish_Man on 23 Oct 2007, 16:51
Quote from: redglasscurls
Young lady, you cover up that bum right now before you cause a traffic accident.

I think she'd need to cover up the legs too... actually I'm not sure there's any way she could wear that kilt and not cause traffic accidents.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 23 Oct 2007, 16:55
ah nevermind, it's too late for this joke
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 23 Oct 2007, 17:31
That is an awesome skirt.  And rest of girl too.  You have a really lovely waist shape!

Anyway, here is me being happy because a) I handed in my final EVER uni assignment (As long as I pass everything obviously)
and b)  I am going to Nick Cave in Brisbane tonight  :-D  Excited!
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0840.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 23 Oct 2007, 17:32
That's a beautiful dress, and you of course look lovely as always.

sorry to quote, but i just have to say, pay attention to this. it is how you compliment girls in a non-creepy way! it is so exemplary i just had to point it out.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 23 Oct 2007, 20:23
As I'm sure you ladies are all aware, you are all damn gorgeous and I am dreadfully disappointed at the lack of equally attractive ladies in my general vicinity.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 23 Oct 2007, 20:32
This book is the not so great highlight of my day. Until it is time for sleep this is the book I will be reading, making notes from, re-reading, typing notes, re-reading, throwing, stabbing, stressing, making more notes from, re-reading.

*Sigh* The look on my face is a look that says "I am going to be completely batshit insane at the end of this"

(http://img86.imageshack.us/img86/8349/mypicturemb0.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 23 Oct 2007, 21:08
Aww, but come on! It comes with a free online test!

Also, apparently Australia has some kind of weird Zionist/Communist military thing going on? I didn't realise that.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 23 Oct 2007, 21:09
The free test is not worth the pain and suffering I am currently undertaking in the form of this book.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Gryff on 23 Oct 2007, 22:22
ebony willow, that would be an amazing concert. I am jealous!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ZJGent on 24 Oct 2007, 00:05
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/zeejay_djinn/backtm1.jpg)

Drunken hilarity ensued. God I love a club that has PhotoBooth on a little screen available to drunken punters.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 24 Oct 2007, 01:20
RGC I am sorry I did not say anything about your dress, but it is because I want it and am kind of jealous. No offense.


Guys Princy looks so excited.






Roddy you look vaguely like a mime. Be careful or someone will try to kill you.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 24 Oct 2007, 04:32
sorry to quote, but i just have to say, pay attention to this. it is how you compliment girls in a non-creepy way! it is so exemplary i just had to point it out.

Oh, I know how, I just typically choose not to because I'm not a nice person. ^__^
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mooface on 24 Oct 2007, 05:05
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2295/1727584962_a3e43a5807.jpg?v=0)

can you notice something new??  (hint:  there are actually two new things.  the doofy expression on my face is not one of them, i always look like that.)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 24 Oct 2007, 05:17
Oooh, neat glasses!

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2067/1680442482_3fafdaf467_m.jpg)
Peejaaays.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 24 Oct 2007, 06:24
can you notice something new??  (hint:  there are actually two new things.  the doofy expression on my face is not one of them, i always look like that.)
I see a little blue in your hair, methinks.

Do I win a prize?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mooface on 24 Oct 2007, 06:59
I see a little blue in your hair, methinks.

Do I win a prize?

it is purple, but sure!

(http://school.discovery.com/clipart/images/big-prize.gif)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pilsner on 24 Oct 2007, 07:02
And now we know that you're going to a Halloween party as

[img width= height=]http://www.geomundos.com/espana/peterpunk/rei-ayanami_foto_23953wqhfwevvhb.jpg[/img]

That's very excellent.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 24 Oct 2007, 08:20
Prize image
Is she...shitting a tennis ball?

PS- Moo, I think we have the same laptop
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 24 Oct 2007, 09:47
(http://a419.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/7/l_f734ad867bb309d06c3a403804cca8ca.jpg)

Here's me, looking glassy eyed and half dead. That was on my birthday, last month.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 24 Oct 2007, 10:28
Moo thing two: Glasses?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 24 Oct 2007, 10:29
it is purple, but sure!

[img]http://school.discovery.com/clipart/images/big-prize.gif[img]
It looks a little blue on my screen, but hooray!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 24 Oct 2007, 15:03
Looks blue on mine too.  Looks good, as well!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: clockworkjames on 24 Oct 2007, 17:08
looks like fudges blueberry hill colour. I need to find a pic of when I had my hair dyed...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 24 Oct 2007, 18:03
ebony willow, that would be an amazing concert. I am jealous!

It was awesome!  I am sad I forgot to bring my camera because I had a smashing outfit and the opening act was a sexy burlesque dancer.  With a unicorn.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Katherine on 24 Oct 2007, 18:06
Mooface I really like your hair.  The purple is a great shade and it blends in with the rest of your hair nicely.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mooface on 25 Oct 2007, 00:20
aww, thanks for the compliments guys!  and yes, the glasses are new(ish).

and here is a picture because this is the picture thread and it looks a bit empty.

(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v123/5/11/500695798/n500695798_227399_9299.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 25 Oct 2007, 01:37
Why does your hair always look fantastic?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 25 Oct 2007, 02:57
Why does your hair always look fantastic?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 25 Oct 2007, 06:00
(http://img440.imageshack.us/img440/8449/img2449tp4.jpg)

Some of you may recognize this from another forum. Because dammit I'm tired of being overshadowed ;)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Verergoca on 25 Oct 2007, 07:30
<---

*cough*
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Aztex on 25 Oct 2007, 07:33
(http://farm2.static.flickr.com/1328/1463885768_fb3678368b.jpg?v=0) (http://www.flickr.com/photos/artr/1463885768/)

mirrors!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: CmonMiracle on 25 Oct 2007, 07:50
Mai you are looking fantastic as always.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 25 Oct 2007, 12:10
Bloo...I bombed an exam this morning.  And it's cold outside.  And I don't wanna get my flu shot.  Blooooooo.

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b131/sutekitatakai/MyPicture-15.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 25 Oct 2007, 17:08
A shot every now and then is good for you! My pa used to give me shots once a week to make sure none of the bad smells killed me when I went to school. Just wish he'd thought of a way to protect against the cane...

On a much more upbeat note, this remote...
Puts so much power right into my hand...

(http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z1/Darryl_LP/Photo26.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 25 Oct 2007, 17:36
I see what you did there.

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2083/1752848168_80475e64f5.jpg?v=0)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Wild_Weasel87 on 25 Oct 2007, 17:42
My yard is curiously devoid of furry woodland creatures...

(http://i196.photobucket.com/albums/aa248/w119alt/squirrel.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Simulacra on 25 Oct 2007, 19:16
I am dreadfully disappointed at the lack of equally attractive ladies in my general vicinity.

SW there will be a very attractive young lady roaming around various parties in the OKC/Edmond area over the course of the next week wearing a princess Leia slave bikini.  I don't know exactly where as I have no wish to track the movements of recent ex's.  You should go find her.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 25 Oct 2007, 19:17
Oh yeah?!

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PA250007.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 25 Oct 2007, 19:18
I'm not sure I wanna chase down your ex, brosef.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: McTaggart on 25 Oct 2007, 19:58
My yard is curiously devoid of furry woodland creatures...

Amazing!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 25 Oct 2007, 22:26
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/l_f999a3d38f695463fa21fdcc6217814c.jpg)

It's a little inside joke. The rubber duck. Yeah. Good times...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 25 Oct 2007, 23:22
So the other night my friend and I were petty bored, so we decided to do our make up and go out like this:

(http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q228/andlemonade/P4170971edit.jpg)




Did I mention that I cut and dyed my hair? Yeah. You can't really tell in that picture. It's purpley now, though.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 26 Oct 2007, 00:10
Soooo... you now have a mullet.
Spectacular.

(http://a898.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/38/l_42eb49af133091701d876192139e0de9.jpg)
Here's a picture of me being tackled. It did not feel good.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mooface on 26 Oct 2007, 02:01
okay i hate to be "that girl" who posts three pictures on one page of the photo thread (especially because i basically only post photos at this point)  but this quote made me laugh out loud:

Why does your hair always look fantastic?

because the first thing i thought was "oh, if only he could see my bedhead."  then i realized that with the magic of internet and digital cameras, he can! and although i'm sure none of you really want to see the disaster i am when i wake up in the mornings, i decided my bedhead is truly epic enough to merit a spot on the internet.  i am nice, though, so you get to choose whether you want to see the horror or not:

today was a good day because usually my bangs are sticking straight up. (http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2104/1755491775_eb8e9c8228.jpg?v=0)
i was going to edit out my bloodshot eyes because they are pretty terrible but then i decided they add authenticity. (http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2021/1755491761_78b73dba73.jpg?v=0)

congrats to anyone who still wants to be my friend after this and yes, i feel sorry for my boyfriend too.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 26 Oct 2007, 02:29
I honestly do not get girls and their hatred of their own bedhead.

It is pretty much awesomely adorable and possibly even sexy 99% of the time. The other 1% are girls who are balding, but won't shave their head.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 26 Oct 2007, 03:13
Bedhead is sexy because of when you get to see it.  :evil:
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: The extra letter on 26 Oct 2007, 05:19
This an is awesome t-shirt I got yesterday. I think it's awesome.

(http://img141.imageshack.us/img141/6222/tshirtst9.jpg)

It's a bit tight around the moobs, but other than that it's totally awesome.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 26 Oct 2007, 06:02
(http://a60.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/126/l_28d0d3baca27e3409ea6f578943b9a93.jpg)

HEY JOE IS MY BEDHEAD SEXY TOO?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 26 Oct 2007, 06:39
Guys! Who wants to see my bedhead? It's astounding!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 26 Oct 2007, 07:15
(http://www.touchandgorecords.com/images/catalog/fullsize/2-1.jpg)

My Bedhead.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: CmonMiracle on 26 Oct 2007, 09:36
Leave it to the guys to pass up an opportunity to compliment Mai and instead take a joke and run with it.  :laugh:
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: TheFuriousWombat on 26 Oct 2007, 10:03
Tumbling Tower II blocks (they're not fucking Jenga blocks, for the last time) take a tremendous amount of time to balance on one's face. I think you'll agree, though, that it was well worth it:

(http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v130/165/57/1337370343/n1337370343_30101345_5124.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 2.0 on 26 Oct 2007, 11:32
Oh yeah?!

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PA250007.jpg)

http://www.collegehumor.com/video:1782388
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SusurrusIgnoramus on 26 Oct 2007, 12:07
i think that's one of the few videos i've seen on college humor that are of any worth.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 26 Oct 2007, 13:11
Your bedhead is not the worst I've ever seen, mooface. In fact, if it was a bit more messy than that, I'd be inclined to think it was styled that way instead of bedhead.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Renalia on 26 Oct 2007, 13:28
(http://img222.imageshack.us/img222/917/christmasdaygw8.jpg)


That picture was taken long ago. At least 4 years. Or something. I have since gained contacts, a full goatee, and a double chin. I'm trying to get rid of one of those things.

Maybe if I actually decide to shave I'll post a new picture. :P
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 26 Oct 2007, 13:35
What is it with "big boned" men and goatees?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 26 Oct 2007, 14:54
To hide said chin?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 26 Oct 2007, 15:00
Guys my bedhead is not "bedhead" so much as "afro". Does this still count?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Boro_Bandito on 26 Oct 2007, 18:42
that's exactly why I'm trying to grow mine out, though I just don't have the patience for it. Let the double-chin be seen!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 26 Oct 2007, 18:55
Guys my bedhead is not "bedhead" so much as "afro". Does this still count?
You have to post pictures for us to judge.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: BobJoeJim on 27 Oct 2007, 00:09
Wow, there is a remarkable number of gorgeous women who frequent this forum and, fortunately, this thread.  I'll refrain from naming specific examples in a feudal attempt to minimize the creepiness factor.  Also to avoid carpal tunnel syndrome.  Anyway, this is what I look like:

(http://i224.photobucket.com/albums/dd18/BobJoeJim22/MtAshland7262007021Cropped-1.jpg)

oregon coast.
freeze your ass off, FOR FREE! :D

Sweet!  I'm not the only Oregonian here!

Yes, "feudal" was an intentional misspelling.  Hopefully saying so doesn't ruin the joke, as long as it's in tiny unreadable text at the bottom of the post.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: koernel on 27 Oct 2007, 03:00
(http://images.lokalisten.de/photos/a/2007/10/22/42/341195_1193080957265l.jpg)

a good friend of mine (left) and me drinking good, german beer :)

ps: for the foolish guys: i am the one with the glasses :P
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: schimmy on 27 Oct 2007, 03:22
(http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee300/n1xxa1/PA260241.jpg)
School trip to Italy.
Alcohol.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 27 Oct 2007, 04:52
I am so sure I went out with that girl when I was in highschool. She was a nutbag and didn't like cuddles.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Boro_Bandito on 27 Oct 2007, 05:54
I was really about to correct you BobJoeJim, showed me!

The guy in the background of that photo has an Awesome looking shirt, is that a pink and yellow cobra?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: koernel on 27 Oct 2007, 12:48
I think he has a fascinating double chin
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 27 Oct 2007, 19:26
I went to a dress up interactive screening of the Rocky Horror Picture Show last night.  Guess which trampy maid won best dressed female   :wink:

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0848.jpg)

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0851.jpg)

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0852.jpg)

I find it more than a little sad that I didn't have to buy a single new thing for this costume.  I just took things out of my regular wardrobe.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 27 Oct 2007, 20:40
I've said it before and I'll say it again:

ebony_willow,
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 27 Oct 2007, 20:50
See above.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 27 Oct 2007, 20:52
The last thing you say is what makes the whole thing so [creepy]incredibly hot[/creepy].
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 27 Oct 2007, 21:18
I got a bottle of wine for it!  And assorted other gifts.  It was awesome because I didn't even try
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 27 Oct 2007, 22:17
have a lap dance

(http://photos-358.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v151/209/40/502738358/n502738358_233719_9350.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Gryff on 28 Oct 2007, 01:35
RUUUYIIIII
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 28 Oct 2007, 02:03
WAHAAT
WHAT
ATWHAT
WAHT

GRYFFFFFFFFFF
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 28 Oct 2007, 02:41
QC People met in Newcastle!

On two seperate days!

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2296/1786278167_a7f249fb73.jpg)

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2267/1786295829_692ad89d54.jpg)

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2404/1786310753_90192408dd.jpg)

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2122/1786441879_55b7e38913.jpg)

There is a set of more pictures if anybody wants to look!
Right here! (http://www.flickr.com/photos/slackadaisy/sets/72157602757383643/)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: est on 28 Oct 2007, 03:19
cross-posting madness!

1. Ally totally scraped this into the rock while we were there.  I saw her do it.  Erik and Hanana saw her do it.  We all did.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v371/est_xplosif/aurostion/beach_ally.jpg)

2. This is Erik sitting inside the cage some local people constructed around him to keep him from ever leaving.  They also built a shrine to him just out of the picture and were genuflecting profusely.  Their chanting actually got a bit tiresome.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v371/est_xplosif/aurostion/beach_erik.jpg)

3. I had to set my camera to the macro setting for this picture.  The beach in the background isn't really all that far away, Hanana is just really tiny.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v371/est_xplosif/aurostion/beach_hanana.jpg)

4. It was a lovely day at the beach!


* NB: 3 out of 4 of these statements are actually lies
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 28 Oct 2007, 03:39
And some of my photos!

(http://img100.imageshack.us/img100/8527/pa260111pn5.jpg)
(http://img137.imageshack.us/img137/8799/pa260108vk1.jpg)
(http://img145.imageshack.us/img145/5996/pa260103ko9.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 28 Oct 2007, 03:43
Oh god is that what I really look like in those pants?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 28 Oct 2007, 05:39
That looks like SO much fun.

My bedhead:

(http://i188.photobucket.com/albums/z1/Darryl_LP/bedhead.png)

Is better than my regular hair...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 28 Oct 2007, 08:10
Dear Australia,
Stop hogging all the pretty and awesome. Just because it is cold where I am doesn't mean we don't deserve some of that too.
Cordially,
James Crawford,
Esq.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 28 Oct 2007, 10:49
To make things short, the reason I have a panda earring in my nose is because I was showering too hard after a big plane trip and my nose screw which is patently designed to not fall out fell out.  The physics of the mechanism proved too complex for my simple hyu-man mind, but I was still worried about it falling out. 
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v631/kauhornz/Photo31.jpg)
I'm a fool.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 28 Oct 2007, 12:08
That is pretty awesome.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 28 Oct 2007, 14:26
Yeah, but I bet you hulk-out when you tense.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 28 Oct 2007, 14:39
That's an epic photo. That's some fine art right there, rivalling this (http://i.treehugger.com/adam_god.jpg).
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: schimmy on 28 Oct 2007, 14:46
I actually went to the Sistine Chapel last week. It was so disappointing that I played Tetris on my phone in there.
Next week: Pacman at the Taj Mahal.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Gemmwah on 28 Oct 2007, 15:31
I went shopping today, which was fun as I've been working almost solidly for the past three weeks and it was nice to get out of the house for once!

(http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y172/FrozenLily/IMAG0002-4.jpg)

I bought a bunch of new earrings, including most of the ones I'm wearing there (the dangly ones are little guitars). I also finally caved and got my hands on an emo tea towel, and some new eyeshadow which is olive/khaki green and actually looks rather nice on. I'm wearing it there but I didn't put enough on so you can't really see it. I got a pair of really cool Jack Skellington earrings too, and some coin purses that are really cute. I was contemplating getting some drainpipes, but couldn't find any nice ones so I decided not to.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 28 Oct 2007, 15:35
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2122/1786441879_55b7e38913.jpg)
whoah eris is tiny

Or est is big I suppose, one or the other.

EDIT: No wait, erik provides additional size reference. Yeah, eris is just tiny.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 28 Oct 2007, 16:17
Erik is also a giant, remember. He is crazy tall on account of being Dutch.


I am really quite tiny, though, yes. People don't seem to realise this until they meet me in real life and go "Woah, you're so short!!"
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 28 Oct 2007, 16:31
Being short and Eris is a pretty awesome thing, I think.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 28 Oct 2007, 16:39
For better reference:

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2357/1787295548_272b19900c.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 28 Oct 2007, 16:46
Oh man. Short too? ++++.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 28 Oct 2007, 16:48
But see, Erik and Est are GIANTS! They make me feel tiny too.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 28 Oct 2007, 22:19
(Kimjongsick, our meetup in Sitka will be 100000x more epic. Yes?)

(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN8196.jpg)

Yay for sleepovers and having pictures taken right after you wake up! Why I'm on the floor, I am unsure...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tyrial on 29 Oct 2007, 05:33
(Kimjongsick, our meetup in Sitka will be 100000x more epic. Yes?)

I don't know if you can get more epic than ours, it was a whole lot of fun. Also, Ally is keeping the group butt photo in reserve as proof of the sheer awesomeness

whoah eris is tiny

But good things come in small packages!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: normz on 29 Oct 2007, 08:52
awww why do no cool QC people ever decide to congregate in cairns..... we have pretty rainforest and beaches and uhhh stuff??

in any case this is my new haircut guys... this was taken in the middle of me getting ready to go out (the post clothes and hair stage but the pre-makeup stage)

(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y94/normz/20-10-07_1908.jpg)

excuse dodgy cameraphone
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Kylos on 29 Oct 2007, 10:56
Gemmwah. Get rid of that tea towel this instant.
Also, army night.

(http://photos-329.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v143/217/21/286001329/n286001329_663663_3637.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 29 Oct 2007, 11:45
(Kimjongsick, our meetup in Sitka will be 100000x more epic. Yes?)

Hell yeah it will.

(for the record, if anybody else from here wants to show up, you're welcome to, but I can only promise RWS a place to stay, sorry guys)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Gemmwah on 29 Oct 2007, 12:12
Gemmwah. Get rid of that tea towel this instant.
Also, army night.

[img]http://photos-329.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v143/217/21/286001329/n286001329_663663_3637.jpg[img]

Fuck, you. I kinda like it.

Also, you make a cute army girl.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 29 Oct 2007, 16:19
I am really quite tiny, though, yes.
Are you an anime character? I didn't notice the first time I saw it, but in that pic you really look like an anime character, like a cute little girl who giggles while destroying tanks with her bare hands.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 29 Oct 2007, 18:29
(http://img143.imageshack.us/img143/1792/loscostumeqm2.jpg)

At a halloween party this last saturday.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Cartilage Head on 29 Oct 2007, 18:53
 A Jawa!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ZJGent on 29 Oct 2007, 19:51
More from the club with photobooth - awww yeah.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/zeejay_djinn/softdunczach.jpg)

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/zeejay_djinn/vitazach.jpg)

woop woop!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 29 Oct 2007, 20:05
I was Medusa this weekend! Halloween is awesome.
(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v142/77/17/5739266/n5739266_36458936_776.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 29 Oct 2007, 20:19
Cameraman couldn't even stare into your eyes long enough to get a non-blurry picture. Good job.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 29 Oct 2007, 21:41
awww why do no cool QC people ever decide to congregate in cairns..... we have pretty rainforest and beaches and uhhh stuff??

in any case this is my new haircut guys... this was taken in the middle of me getting ready to go out (the post clothes and hair stage but the pre-makeup stage)

[IMG], a fairly large one but certainly worth reposting in a quote

excuse dodgy cameraphone


If I had the time and the resources I would be right there. And that's a completely awesome haircut!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 29 Oct 2007, 22:07
Aughhh picture quote. 

I was feeling pretty today.

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b131/sutekitatakai/MyPicture-16.jpg)

And for some reason, whenever I look directly into the camera of my iMac, it photographs me looking right above it.  I think my camera is autistic. 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 29 Oct 2007, 22:18
this was taken in the middle of me getting ready to go out (the post clothes and hair stage but the pre-makeup stage)

Pre-makeup suits you really, really well, normz.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 29 Oct 2007, 22:39
MEMORANDUM:

TO: Jeph Jacques, Moderators, Forum Members at Large

FROM: Slick

DATE: October 30 2007

RE: Picture Thread

________________________________________________________________________________________

It would appear that recent postings indicate that Normz is in fact pretty. Since becoming apparent in the
picture thread, this fact has caused some problems with the smooth functioning of said thread.

Pretty as she may be, it is still unnecessary to quote pictures of her again in the thread, barring, of course,
exceptions for conspicuous awesomeness. No regular posting is to be discouraged, but quoting of pictures
is, as usual, to be frowned upon.

Additionaly, OH MY GOD THERE'S A FINGER UP MY NOSE. See attached.
________________________________________________________________________________________

(http://img149.imageshack.us/img149/1433/n122602645342047684479my6.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: BobJoeJim on 29 Oct 2007, 23:00
Not that it was I who dunnit, but as a forum newbie I'm curious, is picture-quoting really that big of a deal if the quote ends up on a seperate page of posts from the initial pic?  It seems to me that should be a relevant factor...

Also, to Boro_Bandito and anyone other pedants who may have been at least temporarily tripped up in my "feudal" trap, I would just like to say:

(http://i224.photobucket.com/albums/dd18/BobJoeJim22/716and7182007004.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 29 Oct 2007, 23:06
Generally speaking it just isn't necessary. If you feel you need to reference a particular post then it is better to do it like so:

Standin' on a rock.

Dang dude, what is it with you and nature?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: BobJoeJim on 29 Oct 2007, 23:14
Simple answer, I don't own a digital camera, but dated a girl who did.  We went on two dates that involved hiking.  I don't really have any other good digital pics of myself.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 30 Oct 2007, 00:56
SWM SEEKS FEM MUST OWN DIGITAL CAMERA
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: BobJoeJim on 30 Oct 2007, 01:31
... AND ENJOY RANDOM SPIDER FACTOIDS (aren't I a catch?)  :roll:
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: heather on 30 Oct 2007, 02:58
MY TRIUMPHANT RETURN TO PICTUREDOM

(http://www.heatherd.org/images/backbend.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 30 Oct 2007, 04:14
...bloody hell...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 30 Oct 2007, 06:19
HTHR!! Triumphant return...


and how!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Boro_Bandito on 30 Oct 2007, 08:07
I've been rasberried by a hippy! OH NOES
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 30 Oct 2007, 08:48
Should that pic go in the "Sea Creatures You Probably Should Be Aware Of" thread? The hthrcrab?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 30 Oct 2007, 15:25
WILL TURNER?!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: onewheelwizzard on 30 Oct 2007, 15:27
New theme: puppy piles!

(http://www.wayfinderexperience.com/albums/nm5-witchhunt/958_G.jpg)

Fall 2004.

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 30 Oct 2007, 15:29
I don't think I even know that many people.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: gmalivuk on 30 Oct 2007, 15:37
If you want to know what I actually look like now, go to the parent/child resemblance thread or just click here (http://www.gmalivuk.com/metoday.jpg).

Below is a picture of me around Christmas of 1985 (when I was just about 2 years, 9 months old).  I uploaded this because I was looking for old Halloween pictures, and didn't have much luck, but I'm pretty sure I did later wear the bunny costume for trick or treating.

(http://pics.livejournal.com/gmalivuk/pic/0005x4c1.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 30 Oct 2007, 16:17
You'll shoot your eye out, kid!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 30 Oct 2007, 17:07
If we're doing some old photos, this one is circa 2004/senior year of HS (I was Mrs. Paroo in the Music Man):

(http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b198/andthentherewaslindsey/uhwhuhuh.png)

WHUT?!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 30 Oct 2007, 17:23
I played her too! Unfortunately I only have one or two pictures of me in costume, and they're both at home.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 31 Oct 2007, 11:35
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/Mosag/Foto124.jpg)

Fucking metal.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 31 Oct 2007, 11:38
That is a surprisingly good CD.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 31 Oct 2007, 12:54
One of my TAs from freshman year was in love with him, so we bought him Timberlake's cd at the time for Xmas.

I decided then I was better without.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 31 Oct 2007, 16:14
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN8253.jpg)

I have fairy wings and glasses. Hell yes for pictures taken during class.

edit: size...meh...photobucket...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 31 Oct 2007, 16:53
Holy SHIT that is a big picture.

(http://a207.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/108/l_e8219fd547fff80036f7e994cac90136.jpg)

Me and a lady. I was going for my classic pose but I couldn't help smiling next to her.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 31 Oct 2007, 16:59
You're smiling?  :|
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 31 Oct 2007, 17:26
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0864.jpg)

Last night my friend had a low key Halloween party.  It was toooooo hot for costumes, so I just wore lots of clothing with skulls.  Also I have an expression akin to a bunny caught in headlights for some reason.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 31 Oct 2007, 17:46
"This is really soft... WHAT ARE YOU DOING DON'T POINT THAT CAMER-- *flash!* Damnit."
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 31 Oct 2007, 17:50
I liked the pretty cobwebs ^_^ they glowed in the dark.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 31 Oct 2007, 17:54
Mail me your skirt, I want it.
Thank you.
At least tell me where you got it, if you don't want to pay postage.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 31 Oct 2007, 17:55
You're smiling?  :|
Ouch. Chuck, you have a cute smile. Smile more!
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2350/1786873925_10626b0d77.jpg?v=0)
(I'm cheating by using one of lunchy's photos) Do you have any idea how hard it is to avoid looking at camera when there are three out at the same time?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 31 Oct 2007, 18:17
Mail me your skirt, I want it.
Thank you.
At least tell me where you got it, if you don't want to pay postage.

From Jay Jays...I dont know if you have them wherever you are from (I cant keep track of everyone's countries) but it's just a clothiong chain store.  It was $20.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: cupcakeonastick on 31 Oct 2007, 19:56
This was taken ~2 years ago.

(http://malorie.pretentiousgamer.com/cupcakeonastick.png)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 31 Oct 2007, 19:58
How appropriate!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: cupcakeonastick on 31 Oct 2007, 20:21
Right after that picture was taken, the cupcake was skewered completely through, sliding down to my hand.

It died in my arms.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 31 Oct 2007, 20:33
You're smiling?  :|
Ouch. Chuck, you have a cute smile. Smile more!
(I'm cheating by using one of lunchy's photos) Do you have any idea how hard it is to avoid looking at camera when there are three out at the same time?

See, I am not the only one who says it Chuck! Smile more! And hey, I am in that photo too, my hair looks WILD.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: David_Dovey on 31 Oct 2007, 20:39
This is me 3 years ago. I have no idea what I was doing.

(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a55/ddovey/shane19th34.jpg)

I probably didn't know at the time, either.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 31 Oct 2007, 23:50
I've got a pretty good idea what you were doing.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Kylos on 01 Nov 2007, 05:22
circa 2003
(http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v122/2/55/512734053/n512734053_121077_4984.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 01 Nov 2007, 08:50
Here's me as a zombie:
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y120/jhocking/zombie.jpg)

And my fiancee as Daphne from Scooby Doo:
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y120/jhocking/daphne.jpg)

Overall it was a disappointing night last night though. I was gonna chase her around, but it was too cold outside for her to wear the costume out. It was just as well though because we left late and missed the halloween parade. doh
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SusurrusIgnoramus on 01 Nov 2007, 11:54
I have no idea what I was doing.

(you were removing your pantaloons!  preparing for a deboucherous trist, mayhaps?)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 01 Nov 2007, 12:44
That beautiful lady is seriously going to marry Joe Hocking?

Man, maybe there is hope for all of us.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 01 Nov 2007, 13:31
Guys, I wanna be a supah-model
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PA310003.jpg)

And these are the eyes that shall pierce Fred Phelps' soul come Sunday morning:
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PA310001.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 01 Nov 2007, 13:43
Finally got my holiday photos - I went skiing in Chamonix in Febuary.

(http://img217.imageshack.us/img217/8448/guuuuhjk3.jpg)(http://img229.imageshack.us/img229/7494/intenseww2.jpg)
(http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/3151/usjz7.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 01 Nov 2007, 13:59
You must have one of these (http://xkcd.com/285/) when protesting Phelps et al.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 01 Nov 2007, 14:02
I think you got the wrong thread, friend.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 01 Nov 2007, 14:06
And these are the eyes that shall pierce Fred Phelps' soul come Sunday morning:
Topical reference absolves guilt.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 01 Nov 2007, 15:00
third skiing photo
omg that mountaintop in the background is soooo cool

For the geographically challenged among us, where is Chamonix?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 01 Nov 2007, 15:32
I'll assume you mean the one directly behind us (which wasn't even the top) and not like the other 50 or so in the background.

Chamonix is in the French Alps, near the borders of Italy and Switzerland. I skiied on Mt. Blanc!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: squawk on 01 Nov 2007, 15:48
Okay so I got a haircut last week sort of. Nothing too fun yet, just some bangs and a trim to keep it from being stupidly long.
(http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n217/rageaholicdove/10272007-1.jpg)

I spent this weekend at my sister's house near MOUNT DIABLO
(http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n217/rageaholicdove/10272007-2.jpg)
I think the actual mountain is to the left of that smaller one in the picture.

My brother was Link for a Halloween party so I made him this sword out of cardboard and tapes:
(http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n217/rageaholicdove/10272007-3.jpg)

I asked him to bring it back for me but he DIDN'T and I was very angry. Oh well.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 01 Nov 2007, 15:54
That is not the Master Sword!

I call shenanigans!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: squawk on 01 Nov 2007, 15:56
I couldn't remember what it looked like and I was working under time constraints with a tiny Swiss army knife :(

I made him a shield too, it sucked.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: philharmonic on 01 Nov 2007, 16:15
this is not a costume so i figured i'd put it here.
(http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v127/185/121/675876512/n675876512_401717_4651.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 01 Nov 2007, 16:48
This is my "I'm going to go dance to The Go! Team tonight" outfit:
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Skibas_clavicle/pregoteam.jpg)

I don't know how to smile on demand!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 01 Nov 2007, 17:12
That skirt is pretty awesome.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 01 Nov 2007, 17:14
Julia is pretty awesome.
She is my style icon.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 01 Nov 2007, 17:48
Julia, I found out about that show the day before when I sold a kid I knew tickets for the bus to Toronto. Tragically, I did not have the money to rush out to Toronto and see them.
My heart is a little broken that I missed it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 01 Nov 2007, 19:57
I couldn't remember what it looked like and I was working under time constraints with a tiny Swiss army knife :(

I made him a shield too, it sucked.

Did it have the Triforce and a phoenix of sorts emblazoned upon it?

If not: you're fucking fired!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: WeezeOnMe on 01 Nov 2007, 20:06
(http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b3/McSpankie/l_51b9687ea5ee800742c5c0ad0a579a2e.jpg)

About to operate on those damn fascists.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: squawk on 01 Nov 2007, 20:07
Did it have the Triforce and a phoenix of sorts emblazoned upon it?

If not: you're fucking fired!

Of course it did. I just didn't draw them very well and it was all asymmetrical and shit. I was going off this picture (http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n217/rageaholicdove/Linkbirdcopy.png) I drew a few weeks ago, for which I went off the TP booklet.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 01 Nov 2007, 20:27
http://i16.photobucket.com/albums/b3/McSpankie/l_51b9687ea5ee800742c5c0ad0a579a2e.jpg
About to operate on those damn fascists.

Emilio's brother?!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 01 Nov 2007, 21:56
The girl in that pic is pretty cute...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 01 Nov 2007, 22:07
"I'm going to go dance to The Go! Team tonight"

Hell yes! I have precisely 2 months to persuade everyone I know to fork out A$40 to come see them in Melbourne with me if I'm to fulfil my vow of never going to see the Go! Team by myself alone ever again.

ATTENTION EVERYONE, COME TO MELBOURNE AND GO FUCKING NUTS TO THE GO! TEAM WITH ME ON THE 3RD OF JANUARY.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pilsner on 01 Nov 2007, 23:29
-
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 02 Nov 2007, 03:12
I don't know how to smile on demand!

It doesn't even matter when you look that good.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 02 Nov 2007, 07:07
(http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b198/andthentherewaslindsey/0004.jpg)

I didn't want to get up yesterday morning. I wanted sleeeeeeep.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 02 Nov 2007, 08:10
The Go! Team show pictures! Also, everyone should see them live, this was my second time and it made me decide that they are probably my favourite live act. Go to Melbourne and see that show with Harry, Aussies!

One of my best friends, Graham:
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Skibas_clavicle/P1191000.jpg)
Me, drinking:
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Skibas_clavicle/P1191003.jpg)
Horribly unflattering picture of us mid-show:
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Skibas_clavicle/P1191004.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 02 Nov 2007, 09:52
I feel like you are a drawing by Mitch Clem and that he is crushing really hard on that drawing.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 02 Nov 2007, 16:47
I bought the most ridiculously awesome coat today. Also I tried to be a model but it didn't really work.

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2338/1833953612_8679fc5450.jpg?v=0)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 02 Nov 2007, 19:42
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN7794-1.jpg)

I ended up on my floor again.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 03 Nov 2007, 03:42
Awesome hat.

Awesome all round, in fact.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mfpole on 03 Nov 2007, 10:30
I saw the Go! team in Brooklyn last week! They were so good! My god, Ninja tore it up.

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Joseph on 03 Nov 2007, 22:23
Lalaladida, your photo made me miss Vancouver a ton, even the buses.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 03 Nov 2007, 22:25
Dear, Sythe,

I have to say that I am severely disappointed. Your avatars have always led me to believe you were rather a stick figure.

Either you lied, or you are one hell of a fatty.


Love, Calenlass
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: IronOxide on 04 Nov 2007, 19:21
I haven't put up a picture, so I will post one from halloween!

(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v151/107/56/564701722/n564701722_425536_8589.jpg)

On the right is Bob, we are Scotsmen.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 04 Nov 2007, 19:36
Scotsmen are known worldwide for their ill-fitting shirts.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: squawk on 04 Nov 2007, 21:04
(http://i42.photobucket.com/albums/e301/rapgirl123/band/2007_11030001.jpg)

Band jenga: Not as gross as Sex Jenga.

After this picture I made it taller than me.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: IronOxide on 04 Nov 2007, 21:30
I can tell the flutes on top, but what are the weird boxes under them? Mellos? Explosives?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: KTkat on 04 Nov 2007, 21:35
I'm going to guess they're hat boxes.

That picture almost makes me miss my band geek days...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: IronOxide on 04 Nov 2007, 21:38
Dag, those are some fancy hat boxes. Ours look like corrugated cardboard boxes made of plastic.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 05 Nov 2007, 04:08
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v631/kauhornz/Photo32-1.jpg)

Respect the hideous scarf.
Also, if anyone wants to mail me some Burt's Bees, I would not be opposed.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 05 Nov 2007, 04:17
I am the designated US-to-Aussieville Burts Bees mailer it seems, PM me an address and I'll send you some

PS I have an uglyscarf too, but I bought it from british army surplus before they were cool. I wear it as a shirt sometimes!
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v352/redglasscurls/Narcissism/frontnohead.jpg?t=1194265166)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 05 Nov 2007, 04:36
That's pretty awesome, manda.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 05 Nov 2007, 04:36
I have three questions.

1: They sell British army surplus in the USA?  :?

2: British army surplus is cool!?  :?  :|

3: Can you get me a red coat?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 05 Nov 2007, 04:50
1. The internet does!
2. Army surplus is always cool.
3. Probably not, us yanks burnt them all
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 05 Nov 2007, 05:09
3: Can you get me a red coat?

http://www.sutlers.co.uk/acatalog/zulu.html
http://www.sutlers.co.uk/acatalog/Napuni.html
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 05 Nov 2007, 05:37
Army surplus is always cool.

What if you're a pacifist?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 05 Nov 2007, 05:43
Huh? They're clothes. You don't start hitting people if you wear army surplus.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 05 Nov 2007, 06:04
But it signals a willingness to be associated with an organisation that is by its very definition violent. Furthermore it suggests that that organisation, and by extension the violence it perpetuates, is cool.

Unless it's Japanese Army surplus, I guess.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 05 Nov 2007, 06:23
PAGE 25!
MONUMENTAL MILESTONE TWENTY-FIFTH PAGE SUPER NOSE POST
(http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/1392/nosemu6.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pen on 05 Nov 2007, 06:45
Slick, I think I love you.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 05 Nov 2007, 06:50
Inlander, army surplus is cool because it is ridiculously durable, not all prissy, and comes in the greys/greens that seem to make up most of my wardrobe. if your wear army stuff ironically enough, it's not say 'woo go army'.
It's all about style y'see;)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: supersheep on 05 Nov 2007, 07:25
But it signals a willingness to be associated with an organisation that is by its very definition violent. Furthermore it suggests that that organisation, and by extension the violence it perpetuates, is cool.

Unless it's Japanese Army surplus, I guess.

By this token then, those kheffiyeh-scarf thingies that everyone (and their dog) is wearing mean that you support the killing of Israeli people? I think fashion is dissociated from the things it symbolises, to be honest. I don't see kheffiyeh and go "He likes Hamas," I see kheffiyeh and go "You are wearing a thing that everyone else is wearing, silly."

This, of course does not go for Manda cos wearing it as a top is way cool.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: negative creep on 05 Nov 2007, 11:28
I consider myself a pacifist. But i regularly wear this:
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v225/todesfuesch/CIMG5293001.jpg)
It's an original German Bundeswehr parka from the 80s or something. As military as it gets. It's really warm, heavy, ugly and was hella cheap. Does that make me less of a pacifist? I don't think so.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Misereatur on 05 Nov 2007, 11:58
All of the pacifists I know serve in the army.

Hell,
(http://i68.photobucket.com/albums/i2/ffgtthttghyujjfdss/boot.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: supersheep on 05 Nov 2007, 12:55
This is me with a beard. I am at a fancy party. I was wearing a cravat. I think I had lost it by this point.

(http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/7668/pavarottibn8.jpg)

EDIT: Only now do I realise quite how inebriated I look.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: thegreatbuddha on 05 Nov 2007, 14:53
I have to wear a cravat as part of my school uniform. I hate those things. Whenever I move my neck, it feels like I'm being choked.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 05 Nov 2007, 15:01
Three sisters all fancied up for our cousin's wedding. Bain is freaking short.
(http://photos-266.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sctm/v155/77/17/5739266/n5739266_36559785_2683.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 05 Nov 2007, 15:06
There are three of you?  :?  :-o

And, GB, are you at Eton or something?   :|
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: thegreatbuddha on 05 Nov 2007, 15:11
EDIT: I'm gonna delete my whole post, cuz it's not such a good idea in retrospect. Sorry to anyone who got to read it before I fixed it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 05 Nov 2007, 15:16
Sorry. You're not my type
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: cheesepie on 05 Nov 2007, 17:01
I was visiting my sister in Kyiv, Ukraine.. and she took a picture of me as I was playing guitar on her balcony in the morning...... It's one of my favourites!

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v319/cheesepie/orzel.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 05 Nov 2007, 17:05
God damn that's a fantastic picture. 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 05 Nov 2007, 18:27
Agreed. Nice tattoo, btw.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Bearer on 05 Nov 2007, 20:30
me in my most excellent Utility-Kilt:
(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v124/65/123/566427881/n566427881_165866_8119.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 06 Nov 2007, 13:28
Paging Daniel to this thread.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 06 Nov 2007, 15:30
Channeling the Fonz
(http://photos-266.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sctm/v155/77/17/5739266/n5739266_36559783_2066.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 06 Nov 2007, 16:20
I believe everyone has said that at least once.  We are a good looking gang. 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 06 Nov 2007, 16:51
Manda why in the holy hell would you use a curling iron on your naturally wavy hair? It's beautiful as it is, why heat-damage it, heh.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 06 Nov 2007, 17:10
I didn't it just dried weird that day. My mom was drunk at the reception and kept coming up behind me to floof my hair because she was sad it was so flat. What a confidence booster mom, thanks.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: cupcakeonastick on 06 Nov 2007, 17:11
Behold the human slinky stair:

(http://i20.tinypic.com/2njkew8.png)


EDIT: Sorry about that. It opens resized on my computer, so I'd forgotten how big it actually was.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 06 Nov 2007, 17:12
HOLY EFFING LARGE BATMAN
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: chupones on 06 Nov 2007, 19:16
(http://a268.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/1/l_773789c2b23e499fb0dafd80a34139bb.jpg)

Unfortunately, you can't really see my brown-striped suit under the coat.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 06 Nov 2007, 19:17
Sir, your avatar is amazing.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 06 Nov 2007, 21:12
Ahh no makeup!  I like this picture.  Minus the tube top, I look quite innocent.  Muahahah.

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b131/sutekitatakai/MyPicture-17.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 06 Nov 2007, 22:03
Ahh no makeup!  I like this picture.  Minus the tube top, I look quite innocent.  Muahahah.

This very well may have broken Katie.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Napoleon the Clown on 06 Nov 2007, 23:12
Human Slinky Stairs...  Awesome.


And I Is Grammar, you look just fine sans make-up.  Not many women can make that claim, so you should be happy.

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y43/NapoleontheClown/Picture19.jpg)
Work was a bit tiring today.  Everybody but me was doing the drama thing.  So yeah...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 06 Nov 2007, 23:19
Not many women can make that claim

No offense, but fuck that thought. People look fine.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 07 Nov 2007, 00:22
Seriously.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 07 Nov 2007, 02:20
I rarely wear makeup. I'm not looking forward to putting the crap on for my wedding. I only wear makeup when I'm in a play. Which isn't often.

I say that makeup is the silliest invention ever. Way to make ladies feel insecure.

Also, I haven't been around in a while,so here is my Halloween pumpkin. I know, I'm a bit late and it isn't a picture of me, but meh. I'm behind the pumpkin, but you can't see me. Yeeeees. That's it.

Fuck you if you say it looks like Jesus with an apple.

(http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v142/106/13/201003428/n201003428_30486233_3609.jpg)

And Napoleon: For a moment there, I thought you had an Alfalfa-esque cow lick going on there.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ummmkay on 07 Nov 2007, 06:02
I'm with Slick and Caiphana on the makeup thing. I don't own any makeup and I don't plan to. Women who wear a lot of makeup may look different without it, but not necessarily bad!

Also, Daniel, you are a good-lookin' dude!

I can't remember if I've posted this here or not...oh well. I am a NINJA with an AWESOME SCARF! This is about three years ago, I think.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v651/i_so_rule/ninja.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 07 Nov 2007, 08:20
I seriously hate the "UGH I LOOK TERRIBLE WITHOUT MAKEUP" mentality. One of the best-looking girls I've ever met is in Peace Corps and gets paid like $5 a day and she doesn't wear makeup 'cause she just plain can't afford it. And you know what? It works.

That's my 2.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 07 Nov 2007, 08:31
I drastically prefer ladies without make-up.

Not to say that girls wearing make-up is unattractive, obviously some girls know how to use it well. Just that given the preference I'd prefer no make-up.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Orbert on 07 Nov 2007, 09:28
Another vote for no make-up. True, some people can benefit from a little help, but I think the vast majority of women (and men for that matter, ha!) look fine with clean hair and a nice smile.

Tube tops = not innocent? I must've missed the memo.

Manda, your mom must be totally gorgeous. Or maybe your dad, I guess. Either way, there are some high-quality genes in your family.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 07 Nov 2007, 09:35
Beard update:
stuuuuuuubble

Is that all you got?
Bitch, please.

DAY 1:
(http://star.walagata.com/w/fortebass/NSN/I_love_college_094.jpg)

DAY 7:
(http://star.walagata.com/w/fortebass/NSN/Day7.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 07 Nov 2007, 10:13
Son, I started this on Saturday morning.  I'm two full days behind you.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 07 Nov 2007, 10:15
two days should be nothing for a real man of hair growth!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 07 Nov 2007, 10:36
Quote from: people
makeup jazz

I generally don't wear all that much makeup.  Too much of it, to me, is extremely uncomfortable.  I see so many women with 4 inches of makeup slapped on their faces, and it looks pretty trashy.  I just wear makeup to accentuate, not to cover up. 

Hey, picture!  I got new glasses today. 

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b131/sutekitatakai/MyPicture-18.jpg) 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 07 Nov 2007, 10:48
I wear make up daily, but just because I'm still growing out of the awkward teenage acne phase. I have other stuff that I bust out for special occasions and Halloween and such, but usually I just do a little. It makes me a lot more confident just to have a little help.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 07 Nov 2007, 11:44
Fact:
Pretty much anyone looks better with eyeliner.


(applied judiciously, and not if you have white-blonde eyelashes)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 07 Nov 2007, 11:46
Personally I think I look kinda funny with eyeliner, but that's probably just because I never use it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pen on 07 Nov 2007, 11:51
Fact:
Pretty much anyone looks better with eyeliner.


(applied judiciously, and not if you have white-blonde eyelashes)

Even those with white-blonde lashes look good in a lighter brown liner.  Nothing too dark, but enough to definitely accentuate. 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 07 Nov 2007, 12:27
This one dude I worked with this summer came from Romania and he had some really thick eyelashes. That dude was always getting hell from a bunch of 6th grade boys who we eventually got b& from both the restaurants he was working at. I'll take pictarz when we can hang out again, we're supposed to hang sometime after the new year anyway.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 07 Nov 2007, 12:50
Beard City!

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v209/Seanbateman/Photo34-1.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tania on 07 Nov 2007, 13:05
Pretty much anyone looks better with eyeliner.

i disagree!
makeup is like one of the great wonders of the world for me or something. i just can't wrap my head around it. i've worn it maybe twice in my life and i think both occasions were for my sister's weddings. it's something i don't ever plan on doing.
if you think about it it's actually kind of scary how makeup has become such a huge industry and daily norm for many people that no one even thinks to question how utterly absurd it is to buy products to put on your face every single day because you don't like how it naturally looks. am i weird? that's really weird, isn't it?

oh and uh i guess i'll post a picture so as to not break the theme of this thread. here's one i like that tommy took when he was visiting.

(http://img162.imageshack.us/img162/8608/n53226004715673832410dv2.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 07 Nov 2007, 13:10
On a scale of 1-10, how much sex did you guys have.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 07 Nov 2007, 13:16
$10 says OVER NINE THOUSAAAAAANNNDD
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 07 Nov 2007, 13:34
FIRST PIC ON PAGE!!!!! :O

(http://www.oflannigans.dk/gfx/billedarkiv/96/20071022111152.jpg)

I don't clearly remember this picture being taken, but here I am with arguably the world's greatest female singer. Srsly.

www.myspace.com/stellablackrose (http://www.myspace.com/stellablackrose)

Anyway. Re: Facial hair:

I am very much considering to just not shave for ten days or so. I am going to see High On Fire on the 16th, so I guess facial hair is pretty mandatory, given the utter manliness of High On Fire's music.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 07 Nov 2007, 13:45
That's a pretty impressive voice.

The cool thing is, she's been a fixture in my small-town circle of friends for like... forever, and now all of a sudden her band is poised to really go somewhere. They've played like... Four gigs, and now they're booked to open for THIN FUCKIN' LIZZY!! :O
They have hardly even existed for a year. This could become fairly big, actually.

Our little Rebecca. We're all so proud of her <3
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 07 Nov 2007, 14:36
i disagree!
makeup is like one of the great wonders of the world for me or something. i just can't wrap my head around it. i've worn it maybe twice in my life and i think both occasions were for my sister's weddings. it's something i don't ever plan on doing.

That's the common consensus amongst gay women.

On a scale of 1-10, how much sex did you guys have.

None. See above.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tania on 07 Nov 2007, 15:13
my roommates will probably argue that they heard noises coming out of my room, but what they do not realize was that those were actually the sounds of me beating tommy to within an inch of his life every time he did something to piss me off.

so i guess on the beating scale that'd be a 10.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 07 Nov 2007, 15:18
This is me having breakfast! In my cow jammies and with my hello kitty cup.  I'm still 7 at heart.

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0879.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 07 Nov 2007, 15:44
I met some other folks on my travels! I stayed with Huda in New York -

(http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v130/203/41/532260047/n532260047_1566229_9239.jpg)

I met Tyler and his girlfriend gave me a tattoo -

(http://photos-022.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v151/147/72/1603290022/n1603290022_30010291_6938.jpg)

I also went to London with MaiAda -

(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v154/55/6/1402230136/n1402230136_30252302_3969.jpg)

Alas, I do not have pictures of Mike, Edith, Tyler, Phil, Katie or Eugene but they were all thoroughly nice folks. I enjoyed myself enormously over the last couple of weeks. Thank you to everyone on the forums who let me stay with them, introduced me to their friends, put up with my rambling bullshit, endured my constant whining. I am touched by how friendly everyone was to a relative stranger. Hooray for the QC Forums!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 07 Nov 2007, 15:46
Did you dedicate it to me while you were shagging any of them like I asked?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 07 Nov 2007, 15:49
Tyler wouldn't put out!

Ruined my whole trip frankly.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 07 Nov 2007, 16:03
I also went to London with MaiAda -
GET YER HANDS OFF MY WOMAN



I mean, um...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 07 Nov 2007, 16:10
I enjoyed myself enormously over the last couple of weeks. Thank you to everyone on the forums who let me stay with them, introduced me to their friends, put up with my rambling bullshit, endured my constant whining. I am touched by how friendly everyone was to a relative stranger. Hooray for the QC Forums!

On the contrary Tommy, you are a cool dude and I'm glad I met you. Come back soon.

Also you are hilarious when jetlagged.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 07 Nov 2007, 17:34
Edit: Apparently I missed the part where a new page started. Oops. /edit

Fact:
Pretty much anyone looks better with eyeliner.

I don't. This could be because I just honestly don't get how to put it on myself. I can do makeup for other people (I organized makeup crew when I did theatre), but I just can't do it on myself.

The only time I think makeup looks good is when you can't tell a person has makeup on in the first place.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 07 Nov 2007, 18:03
I wore eyeliner once. When I was fourteen.

I've tried to t ryless gaudy eyeliner, but I have an issue with rubbing my eyes constantly.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 07 Nov 2007, 18:15
I wore eyeliner once. When I was fourteen.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 07 Nov 2007, 18:19
When I got taught how to use make up the lady taught me a nifty trick. Instead of using an eyeliner pencil or the liquid stuff if you're not that confidant but want a nice smooth line, she (and now I) get a little angled make up brush, wet it, and wet an eyeshadow cake-thingy so it makes a paste and use that as eyeliner. I am trying to find a good photo that demonstrates is, but so far all I can find is this:
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/me/eyes-1.jpg)
(I love eyeliner and eye make up)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: KTkat on 07 Nov 2007, 18:20
You wore eyeliner once last year Eugene?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 07 Nov 2007, 18:30
(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v47/20/92/1351920010/n1351920010_30065382_5324.jpg)

In my defense, this was the 31st of a certain fall month. However I did casually wear eyeliner and various neon colors of nail polish for a while last year.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: cupcakeonastick on 07 Nov 2007, 19:15
I miss when this was my work "uniform"

(http://malorie.pretentiousgamer.com/grill.PNG)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Shadic on 07 Nov 2007, 21:28
THIS IS ME WHEN I SHOULD BE SLEEPING.... PROBABLY A YEAR AGO.

(http://photos-932.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v65/225/68/505783932/n505783932_24380_7075.jpg)

OH, AND I BRING BACK THE CAPS LOCK.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 07 Nov 2007, 21:42
NABEGROMO UPDATE

(http://www.pretentiousgamer.com/photos/scruff.JPG)

Scruff is go!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mooface on 08 Nov 2007, 00:43
i tried to figure out how to use cover up because london turned my face ugly and it was probably the saddest scene ever.  i finally had to have my friend do it for me after she she stopped laughing hysterically at my futile efforts.  i am never doing it again.  fuck you guys anyways, though, because i can't live without my eyeliner.

also, picture.

(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v154/55/6/1402230136/n1402230136_30252292_409.jpg)

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 08 Nov 2007, 00:49
THIS IS ME WHEN I SHOULD BE SLEEPING.... PROBABLY A YEAR AGO.

I KNEW I had seen you somewhere before, then I remembered that you are on xkcd too. I knew that avatar and face looked familiar.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 08 Nov 2007, 01:07
Alas, I do not have pictures of [...] Katie

what


who the fuck is that
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: IronOxide on 08 Nov 2007, 02:12
I wore eyeliner once. When I was fourteen.

Guys, I am so good at putting on eyeliner. Seriously, I got skills. Stage makeup FTW.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Elemental Poser on 08 Nov 2007, 04:00
I like my hat, though most of my friends don't.
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/tshsu/1026072002.jpg)

Me at a friend's place... kicking ass at beer pong.
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/tshsu/12.jpg)

Different party.  Apparently I was about to lick my buddy in the face.  And... drunk girl I've driven home five times too many.  I'm such a good guy.
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/tshsu/n11832713_34599797_8265.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 08 Nov 2007, 06:46
Every girlfriend I've ever had has made it their life goal to get me to wear eyeliner. So far one of them has been successful, and only for about 3 hours.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 08 Nov 2007, 06:56
These are some ambitious girls you've dated.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 08 Nov 2007, 06:58
Alas, I do not have pictures of [...] Katie
who the fuck is that

Katie who posts here under the name KTkat.

(http://photos-022.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v141/147/72/1603290022/s1603290022_30009901_8760.jpg)

Though maybe she should be called QTkat?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 08 Nov 2007, 07:52
Every girlfriend I've ever had has made it their life goal to get me to wear eyeliner. So far one of them has been successful, and only for about 3 hours.

Pffft. That's tame. I've had multiple girlfriends who wanted me to wear their pants...

To get it off the record, I did cave once. Never again after she got righteously upset with me when my ass looked better in them than hers did.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 08 Nov 2007, 08:46
[Daniela and MaiAda]

Daniela's eyes are freaking me out because you can't see the pupils.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 08 Nov 2007, 09:29
To be fair you can't really see MaiAda's either
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 08 Nov 2007, 10:41
Alas, I do not have pictures of [...] Katie
who the fuck is that

Katie who posts here under the name KTkat.

(http://photos-022.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v141/147/72/1603290022/s1603290022_30009901_8760.jpg)

Though maybe she should be called QTkat?


THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tania on 08 Nov 2007, 14:02
i'm pretty sure there are like 20 on the forums dude.
also that katie is consistently one of the most popular names for girls in the us.

if you are really insistent on preserving your sense of individuality, we can give you an endearing nickname.
like "k-fed".
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 08 Nov 2007, 14:07
Tania's new name is Bertha Baseball.

This is another good picture of MaiAda wearing a carpet -

(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v130/203/41/532260047/n532260047_1566240_4904.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Shadic on 08 Nov 2007, 14:12
I KNEW I had seen you somewhere before, then I remembered that you are on xkcd too. I knew that avatar and face looked familiar.
I think this is the first time I've been recognized from another board... And I just joined that one days ago. :(
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 08 Nov 2007, 14:13
We pay close attention to photo threads here;)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 08 Nov 2007, 14:23
It validates our lives.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 08 Nov 2007, 14:39
26 pages and equally long other threads don't happen by accident, you know.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 08 Nov 2007, 15:08
I would link to the Pointless Thread but I am too lazy, so me even mentioning it is not going to be funny.

Oh well lol
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Shadic on 08 Nov 2007, 15:15
We pay close attention to photo threads here;)
Not really, that was my only comment I got!  :roll:
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 08 Nov 2007, 15:54
Just because people don't comment doesn't mean we don't notice.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: KTkat on 08 Nov 2007, 16:18
THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE

You said that already.

Sorry you are not allowed to be a Katie.






THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE

eph is right, it's really fucking common. (I was always one of 5+ in any group I joined in back in high school.)

I am known to some as Kikki though, how does that work?

Also: opening the photo thread and seeing myself twice when I didn't post either is kinda freaky.

Also also: Thanks Tommy!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: godinpants on 08 Nov 2007, 16:39
Guys, I got transformers on dvd yesterday.
IN A BOX THAT TRANSFORMS INTO OPTIMUS PRIME.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/grommit/Photo11.jpg)
Thats the back of it with the disc part open.

the rest are here
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/grommit/Photo6.jpg (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/grommit/Photo6.jpg)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/grommit/Photo7.jpg (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/grommit/Photo7.jpg)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/grommit/Photo8.jpg (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/grommit/Photo8.jpg)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/grommit/Photo9.jpg (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/grommit/Photo9.jpg)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/grommit/Photo10.jpg (http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/grommit/Photo10.jpg)


Also, note my unshavenness.
The hair in my sideburns is a good 4cm long. Im gonna work my way into those old english burns.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Shadic on 08 Nov 2007, 17:06
Just because people don't comment doesn't mean we don't notice.
Psh, notices are boring!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Scrambled Egg Machine on 08 Nov 2007, 18:09
I have no camera. Here is a photo of me in NYC, at Cold Spring Harbor labs. This is at the airport.
(http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q59/scrambledeggmachine/New%20York%20City/NewYorkPhotos091.jpg)
And this is at the lab.
(http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q59/scrambledeggmachine/New%20York%20City/NewYorkPhotos017.jpg)
I'm on the left. The guy on the right was my lab partner, and he is/was a total spaz.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 08 Nov 2007, 18:12
(http://www.artandeth.com/Gallery2/ActorsM/46074-25820.gif)

?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Scrambled Egg Machine on 08 Nov 2007, 18:15
Yeah, a little.We all feel sorry for him at school, though. He acts like he has some sort of mental problem. He's not a bad guy.Also, I need to gel my hair again. I have clearer skin now, though.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 08 Nov 2007, 22:13
the comic book effect in photobooth is interesting when you flood the image with light!

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v321/coolcathay/Photo120.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Verergoca on 08 Nov 2007, 23:23
Me coming off the boat (3 days sailing in the Whitsundays = bloody awesome!)

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2225/1929943036_32b117111a.jpg?v=0)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: normz on 09 Nov 2007, 04:13
ok so I'm a bit late in the debate on the whole make-up thing, but i have to put in my 2 cents .... firstly i have to admit that i'm actually a counter manager for Clinique and free-lance make-up artist so yes the evil beauty industry is my job (well for now anyway im still in law school)... but it's not all bad . I have to admit the best part of my job is getting someone who looks average or ordinary to look stunning and sometimes it might just be a touch of concelear, some mascara and gloss that does it but make-up can truly make a difference in making a woman feel more attractive and confidant.  I've had arguments in the past with boyfriends over me wearing make-up because i HATE not having any makeup on and few people ever get to see me without it, hence alot of boyfriends get annoyed if i need 5 minutes to put makeup on before leaving the house because they argue that i look fine the way i am, but it makes me feel more attractive just like a pair of sexy heels or a flirty dress so whats wrong with it?

Anyway later i am going to dig out 2 photos of me with makeup on and me without for comparison so you guys can be the judge
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 09 Nov 2007, 04:22
THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE

You said that already.

Sorry you are not allowed to be a Katie.






THERE CAN BE ONLY ONE

eph is right, it's really fucking common. (I was always one of 5+ in any group I joined in back in high school.)

I am known to some as Kikki though, how does that work?

Well, see it was weeks ago and in a completely different thread. How am I supposed to remember stuff like that? Sue me for not being original then.

I have to be Katie, because the only other option is going by Mary Katherine and that will just lead to all sorts of problems and I really don't want to be asked if I know the pope or "just how catholic are you" again.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 09 Nov 2007, 05:07
While I agree that it's TOTALLY a Catholic-as-a-crucifix name, it's pretty awesome, I think.

We could just call you M-Kat and you can be gangsta.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: thegreatbuddha on 09 Nov 2007, 07:00
Mary Katherine

(http://img75.imageshack.us/img75/3833/061016marykatevmed4pwidjn6.jpg)

 :?
Title: S-K-E-L-E-T-O-N WARRIORS!
Post by: Spinless on 09 Nov 2007, 07:21
Is that an Olsen twin, or one of Baron Dark's skeleton warriors?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 09 Nov 2007, 07:21
Both?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 09 Nov 2007, 07:27
Just because people don't comment doesn't mean we don't notice.
Psh, notices are boring!

TO be fair, I totally didn't notice you.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mooface on 09 Nov 2007, 07:33
man, 6 posts on a new page of the photo thread and the only photo up is of one of the olsen twins?  you guys suck at this.

here is some cleavage for you guys.
(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v154/55/6/1402230136/n1402230136_30252256_7992.jpg)

ps. tommy i really wish i had forced you to put on one of those printed shirts.  this is so not fair.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 09 Nov 2007, 09:51
MaiAda,
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Dimmukane on 09 Nov 2007, 12:14
MaiAda,
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 09 Nov 2007, 12:19
MaiAda,

Also, I dyed my hair.

Friend doing the coloring
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN8351.jpg)

The outcome (we attempted to straighten it and my hair went POOPH)
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN8391.jpg)

Edit: (I got better pictures, so I took out that bad one)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 09 Nov 2007, 13:36
Me being a hipster. And yes, my living room IS nice.  It's the only part of my house that's remotely clean.
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Skibas_clavicle/beingahipster101.jpg)
Title: [b]Name,[/b] is now a ban-worthy offense!
Post by: Spinless on 09 Nov 2007, 13:42
What're you reading?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: IronOxide on 09 Nov 2007, 14:12
It looks like Chuck Klosterman IV. I've been meaning to get it, but I think I might want to reread Sex, Drugs, and Cocoa Puffs first.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: schimmy on 09 Nov 2007, 14:20
Tourism! Starring: Hungover Sixth Formers!
(http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee300/n1xxa1/l_f0f20e114e16b67b700485639e235eb7.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Shadic on 09 Nov 2007, 14:33
Just because people don't comment doesn't mean we don't notice.
Psh, notices are boring!
TO be fair, I totally didn't notice you.
It happens. :-P
MaiAda,

Also, I dyed my hair.
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN8453.jpg)
Sorry for the myspace angle, it was the only shot that turned out half ok.
...That's the POINT of the MySpace angle!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 09 Nov 2007, 16:45
Oh My God, so many forum faux-pas. I don't know where to start being an asshole.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 09 Nov 2007, 17:03
Let's start here:

1) Shut the fuck up about people paying attention to your pictures.
2) Stop quote tunneling! I swear, if not me someone here will stab you.
3) Do not quote a picture that is obviously on this page (in fact, try not to quote pictures at all). Some unfortunate souls have slow internet and you are fucking KILLING them. So knock it off before we kill you instead.


(http://star.walagata.com/w/fortebass/Shave-ed.jpg)

Sorry, guys. I gave up on not shaving.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ally on 09 Nov 2007, 17:04
I will take it away so you don't need to be!

Shadic, please try to avoid quote tunnels. Also, quoting pictures is sort of redundant and unnecessary, so please refrain from doing so. As an aside, everyone, more pictures please? Let's try to cut down on chatter in general, the picture thread has had a distinct lack of pictures lately.

(Oops, Chuck already replied. BUT READ MY POST. It is more polite.)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 09 Nov 2007, 18:40
Here is a funny picture of me to appease the photothread gods.. It features a very odd expression and also some cleavage (yay).

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2104/1939708009_87ada52b14.jpg?v=0)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 09 Nov 2007, 18:45
Someone helpfully pointing it out too.

Handy.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 09 Nov 2007, 18:49
Well of course, it wasn't obvious enough before.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 09 Nov 2007, 18:52
...That's the POINT of the MySpace angle!

The other ones didn't show the fact that my hair is now a different color. Or I unintentional cropped out half my face. 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 09 Nov 2007, 23:27
Without and with makeup pictures. I was bored. Obviously, I was younger there on the right. If I get less lazy, I'll go take a picture right now and then put makeup on and take another.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v249/dramajuana/Just%20Me/withwithout.gif)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 10 Nov 2007, 01:38
You look better with the glasses

And what appears to be cosmetic dentistry
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 10 Nov 2007, 05:50
Me being a hipster. And yes, my living room IS nice.

Seeing you side on is a strange revelation! And your living room is nice. I will steal it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 10 Nov 2007, 06:16
Julia, you look powerfully unimpressed by that book you're reading.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patatat on 10 Nov 2007, 06:46
(http://a95.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/40/l_3bef5ea3120e6e42b88909d63ac3fb9e.jpg)

FUCK YOU COCKATIEL!

(http://a640.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/53/l_8a83a3d693c0560ec9c363a47ad48fef.jpg)

Me with my patent "You gonna eat that look."

(http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y195/Bajorek/DSCN2255.jpg)

Just don't ask questions, its better that way... BATTLE DUCK!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Cartilage Head on 10 Nov 2007, 08:27
 Pretty great pictures, guy from Underoath.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patatat on 10 Nov 2007, 08:50
Way to hurt my feelings. :(


Would you like me better if I tried to look like I was out of the clockwork orange?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 10 Nov 2007, 08:59
I was gonna post a snarky reply, but then I saw Cartilage Head's avatar and I figured nothing more needs to be said.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jooooosh on 10 Nov 2007, 10:19
(http://img113.imageshack.us/img113/9320/n1547850021300142532836yj4.jpg)

Me, after a play, at a friends house smokin shisha.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 10 Nov 2007, 10:51
Patatat, in the first photo you looked SCARILY like this one dude I went to work with this summer. Then it changed in the next two photos.

Now he's bleached his hair blonde, though. It pretty much makes me want to die.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LiterSize on 10 Nov 2007, 10:58
Looks like I'm a liitle late on books... guess it's time to make a leap to another topic!


(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/Xtract/IMG_3139.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patatat on 10 Nov 2007, 11:30
Patatat, in the first photo you looked SCARILY like this one dude I went to work with this summer. Then it changed in the next two photos.

Now he's bleached his hair blonde, though. It pretty much makes me want to die.

Pretty much, I have the ability to change how I look in every picture. I have a very expressive face I suppose. The last one, and the first one look nothing like me. The middle one is pretty much the closest.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Gemmwah on 10 Nov 2007, 13:59
(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v158/69/35/286000311/n286000311_709495_6364.jpg)

NO ONE'S LAZY IN LAZYTOWN!

I love halloween.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 10 Nov 2007, 14:19
The last one, and the first one look nothing like me.


I liked that one the best though.
:'(
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 10 Nov 2007, 15:54
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN8510.jpg)

I have the cookies.

And I'm not sharing.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 10 Nov 2007, 15:57
THAT IS SO NOT COOL, I ASKED YOU TO SHARE
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 10 Nov 2007, 16:01
But...that was the last one :(

I will make more for you later.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 10 Nov 2007, 16:06
You're British!?  :?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 10 Nov 2007, 16:08
Of course not.

Why?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Cartilage Head on 10 Nov 2007, 18:27
Everybody shut up.

Taken at the Rocky Whore Picture Show, '07..

(http://i28.photobucket.com/albums/c213/hey_there_fatty/11-3-2007-02.jpg)

If you are stupid and cannot recognize me, i am in the exact center, in pink. These are my friends.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 10 Nov 2007, 18:33
Dang Cory, you are the sexiest lady there by some distance. Including the actual ladies.

Of course not.

Why?

I'm guessing but it could be the British football magazine you have in the picture.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 10 Nov 2007, 18:44
This is me in the hilarious post-bleaching pre-dying stage of my monthly hair awesomefying routine.
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0883.jpg)

This is me all done, and much much less retarded looking.
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0890.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 10 Nov 2007, 18:58
You look better with the glasses

And what appears to be cosmetic dentistry
Thank you, I love my glasses.

And my wisdom teeth grew in and pushed my gap together.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 10 Nov 2007, 19:08

I'm guessing but it could be the British football magazine you have in the picture.

Ah, yes. My father and brother are obsessed with football and everything to do with it. Our TV is stuck on FSC I believe.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Shadic on 11 Nov 2007, 01:07
hadic, please try to avoid quote tunnels. Also, quoting pictures is sort of redundant and unnecessary, so please refrain from doing so. As an aside, everyone, more pictures please? Let's try to cut down on chatter in general, the picture thread has had a distinct lack of pictures lately.
I quoted it because it was on a different page, though.  :|

Edit: Here's me making a sand mountain in Hawaii!

(http://a266.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/118/l_1c03100f661e9a062642d4a006f6d361.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: beat mouse on 11 Nov 2007, 03:09
(http://i74.photobucket.com/albums/i273/shotgunmouse/Image004.jpg)

yes i liked the recruit, no that is not the only movie poster i have!
Title: I hate it when Tommy is right. Mmmmm Cory...
Post by: Spinless on 11 Nov 2007, 04:01
The dude in the background of Cory's picture could be his twin!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 11 Nov 2007, 05:19
QC PEOPLE MEETING IN REAL LIFE AGAIN OH MY GOD

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2344/1965090000_936633a207.jpg)
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2058/1965088132_4ef3ecf20d.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tania on 11 Nov 2007, 08:21
cory, i did not recognize you, but admittantly this was because i was too preoccupied with thoughts of "goddamn, that girl in the centre is really pretty."
well done, sir. you make a magnificient drag queen.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 11 Nov 2007, 13:33
Haha Cory's the next Bill Kaulitz.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 11 Nov 2007, 16:19
I am enjoying my very very bright hair at the moment.  But I fear work will not enjoy it so much.  The bleach actually bleached my hair for a change, so the colour seems brighter than my bosses are used to.
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0898.jpg)

Oh hey guys, I bought a new shirt!  Isn't it cute! Meow meow!
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0901.jpg)
Kitties for the win!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: David_Dovey on 11 Nov 2007, 17:33
GUYS IT'S SOME SORT OF GOOD LOOKING PEOPLE CONVENTION

I wish I had snappy for this yappy, but I haven't taken a photo in ages... Maybe when I get my new shirts from Messrs Jacques & Stevens...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 11 Nov 2007, 17:51
Guys, I have siblings. WHEN DID THIS HAPPEN?!?!
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN8511.jpg)

And I'm still in love with my hair..
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN8503.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: The extra letter on 11 Nov 2007, 18:06
Are ratty pictures permitted?

(http://img139.imageshack.us/img139/5705/rimg0298hc3.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: BobJoeJim on 11 Nov 2007, 20:06
The Ducks are now #2 in the BCS!!!

(http://i224.photobucket.com/albums/dd18/BobJoeJim22/n11517461_33682705_2366.jpg)

I'm serious.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: michaelicious on 11 Nov 2007, 21:46
Guys, I have siblings. WHEN DID THIS HAPPEN?!?!

holy shit dakota fanning is your little sister
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 11 Nov 2007, 21:57
The Ducks are now #2 in the BCS!!!

(pictar)

I'm serious.

Somebody had better make a damn awesome shop of this.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Shadic on 12 Nov 2007, 01:45
I have personal connections to the Beavers, so I'm going to have to hope they win instead of those ducks. :P
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Catfish_Man on 12 Nov 2007, 03:27
Are ratty pictures permitted?

They'd better be!

Awwwwww :D
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Der Turm, der Leute frass on 12 Nov 2007, 04:47
me, at the camping area of the worlds most awesome brutal death metal & grindcore festival ever

(http://img61.imageshack.us/img61/3847/49756733xu5.jpg)

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 12 Nov 2007, 07:02
You're accidentally eating food instead of consuming copius amounts of alcohol. This is not metal.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Dimmukane on 12 Nov 2007, 07:08
And sitting in a rather expensive-looking chair.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Coreh on 12 Nov 2007, 07:10
(http://i26.photobucket.com/albums/c101/Coreh/11-12-07_0905.jpg)
i has a job interview.
would you hire me?
i'd hire me.
i'd hire me hard.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: CmonMiracle on 12 Nov 2007, 07:12
Is he eating it in a kind of metal way at least?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mooface on 12 Nov 2007, 07:18
cory, when it comes to having more posts in the photo thread than anywhere else, you are even worse than me :P
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Coreh on 12 Nov 2007, 08:04
'm srry

but i don't really find many other topics interesting.
and i like to get input from other people on how i look
considering this job is really important to me, and i really really want it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 12 Nov 2007, 08:20
Your hair is still good! Thumbs up on the shirt and t-shirt! Stubble doesn't suit you but it makes you look older (by about 8 years).
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Coreh on 12 Nov 2007, 08:35
yeah after seeing the picture i realized i had to shave, so i did!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Shadic on 12 Nov 2007, 11:19
I'd wear an even fancier shirt, though. :P
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: BobJoeJim on 12 Nov 2007, 11:25
This is getting pretty heavily yappy with not much snappy, but then, helping people get jobs is a worthy cause.  What job is the interview for?  I'd say you're pretty much dead on for some, but more formal would be better for others...

I'd hire you.  I'm not sure if I'd hire you hard though.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: BrittanyMarie on 12 Nov 2007, 11:46
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v116/BrittanyMarie/ME/Bunny001.jpg)

That is a Rabbit with Big Pointy Teeth.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 12 Nov 2007, 13:38
Haha!  That rabbit is fantastic.  From Monty Python, yes?  I got one for Valentine's day about a year ago. 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Coreh on 12 Nov 2007, 15:14
I am applying to be a member of orientation staff at my university over this summer. It's one of the most prestigious positions a student can hold! I went to my interview after changing into a different outfit, and apparently I did really well!
After this interview, if they like me, i'm going on to a second interview and if they like me there i'll get the job!
sooo i'm kind of hoping that'll work out! but people told me i did super good today, and that they think i'm a sure bet for getting it!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Shadic on 12 Nov 2007, 17:35
That is a Rabbit with Big Pointy Teeth.
Is it.. Mauling you?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 12 Nov 2007, 17:37
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2344/1965090000_936633a207.jpg)
Your expression of mild alarm is delicious.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ElRodente on 12 Nov 2007, 19:22
You're accidentally eating food instead of consuming copius amounts of alcohol. This is not metal.

you can tell he's not being metal because he has a plastic fork
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Shadic on 12 Nov 2007, 21:27
She has to be alarmed, she's having two pictures taken of her at once!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 12 Nov 2007, 22:15
holy shit dakota fanning is your little sister

Oh man, you figured out my secret...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: BrittanyMarie on 13 Nov 2007, 00:12
From Monty Python, yes? 

Yes'm! I got him when I saw Spamalot in Las Vegas this summer. I was in the front row, and the guy playing Galahad kept looking right at me, which was honestly a little bit creepy.

And of course he is mauling me!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Shadic on 13 Nov 2007, 00:56
Needs more ketchup or something.

And they generally go for the neck, don't they?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 13 Nov 2007, 09:01
Nah dude didn't you see the part where it ripped off the various limbs and stuff? JUST LOOK AT THE BOOONES!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 13 Nov 2007, 09:26
Awww, front row? I got to see Spam with original cast, but I was WAY up in the balconies. I would have killed for orchestra. Of course, the money needed probably would have killed me.

I should go find my autographed program and scan it in...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: celticgeek on 13 Nov 2007, 09:53
We saw Spamalot in New York, just before it "officially" opened.  We were there to see "The Gates", and just happened to be able to catch it. 

We were up in the next to last row in the balcony, but it was still wonderful.  Our friend, however, who is just quicker at this sort of thing, sat in the second row, off to the left. 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LiterSize on 13 Nov 2007, 10:39
there was an awful lot of text earlier...

I mean, if I was going to read something....

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/Xtract/P6090017.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Shadic on 13 Nov 2007, 12:44
"The Breast Book? Is that what this is? I thought it was called "The Best Book," I swear!"  :-P
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 13 Nov 2007, 14:52
Dude, that's the kind of book that you don't have to be ashamed to read.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Aimless on 14 Nov 2007, 03:42
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/Xtract/P6090017.jpg)

Has this pic been posted in this thread before or do I know you from some other forum??!?!

You don't read a lot of Fantasy by any chance do you? :o
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 14 Nov 2007, 04:24
You're accidentally eating food instead of consuming copius amounts of alcohol. This is not metal.

He could be hugging kittens and still be metal, because of the Atheist shirt.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: The extra letter on 14 Nov 2007, 04:36
I took a photo to show my new de-sideburned sideburns. Unfortunately I forgot that headphones aren't particularly seethrough. Here's the photo anyway. You all get to see my brand new pimple and spiffing favourite headphones as a consolation prize.

(http://img413.imageshack.us/img413/8291/rimg0217wx3.jpg)
No more pictures for a while, I promise.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Dimmukane on 14 Nov 2007, 06:35
You're accidentally eating food instead of consuming copius amounts of alcohol. This is not metal.

He could be hugging kittens and still be metal, because of the Atheist shirt.
I guess we could say he borrowed the chair from Gorgoroth's basement.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Aimless on 14 Nov 2007, 09:19
I have been too tired and lazy to shave for a while now. This is unfortunately what I look like today:

(http://img111.imageshack.us/img111/5500/doubleshaggyne0.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Shadic on 14 Nov 2007, 11:08
In the picture on the right, the V of your collar almost blends in with your beard... If it was shaped with that little point, it would be awesome.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 14 Nov 2007, 11:50
I think you look good with a bit of hair!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 14 Nov 2007, 14:20
YOU GUYS!

I HAVE TO COMB MY SIDEBURNS NOWADAYS!


 :-D
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 14 Nov 2007, 14:21
That fails to impress after witnessing khar's sideburns.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 14 Nov 2007, 14:29
That fails to impress after witnessing khar's sideburns.

I haven't noticed them :O

But if they're bigger and bushier than mine, then I am automatically impressed.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 14 Nov 2007, 16:42
Why are you quoting the post above you? Why?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 14 Nov 2007, 16:54
This is what my hair looked like after I took out all the pins holding it in place. Once I scan in the professional photos from my formal, I will post them up.

(http://img158.imageshack.us/img158/8560/pb110077zv4.jpg)

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 14 Nov 2007, 17:06
You are very pretty.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 14 Nov 2007, 17:13
Ooh, theme! I went to two Yr 12 Formals, but don't have any photos of me from the second one.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/formal.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Shadic on 14 Nov 2007, 17:18
Not a formal, but..

(http://img123.imageshack.us/img123/1884/seniorpicmw2.jpg)

Here's one of my Senior Pictures. Whoo.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Dimmukane on 14 Nov 2007, 18:54
Jrmz,









Eris,
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 14 Nov 2007, 18:59
Oh man, I wish I could somehow post my grad picture on QC.

It's even more funny because it's the pic that goes along with your graduation write-up, mine of course being surrounded by official looking high school students holding bouquets and wearing those funny hats. My photo however is one of my best friends and I drunkenly giving the thumbs up at pointing at the camera...we were still wearing those weird hats and robes though. It's pretty epic.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 14 Nov 2007, 20:19
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v249/dramajuana/Random/drunkeded-1.jpg)

Hooray for taking pictures of yourself when not entirely sober.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Shadic on 14 Nov 2007, 20:36
Jrmz,
Eris,


...Ouch. :(
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Dimmukane on 14 Nov 2007, 20:38
If you insist.  Before I do though, I must remind everyone that this is totally not gay.

Shadic,
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: BobJoeJim on 14 Nov 2007, 20:40
I has a new laptop!  Obligatory first attempt at a decent webcam pic while bored at work.  Key word, "attempt".  I suppose this is also a report on NaBeGroMo progress since I haven't shaved since Halloween, even though I wasn't *planning* on participating.

(http://i224.photobucket.com/albums/dd18/BobJoeJim22/Picture003.jpg)

Here's a Halloween pic for reference:

(http://i224.photobucket.com/albums/dd18/BobJoeJim22/Halloween.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 14 Nov 2007, 20:42
Here is a photo from my highschool graduation:
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y120/jhocking/hsgrad.jpg)
Can you tell I went to highschool in CT?

Also, while looking for that I found this photo from playing basketball back in elementary school:
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y120/jhocking/basquet.jpg)
You might think I'm yelling, but that would imply caring about the game. No, I was definitely yawning.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 14 Nov 2007, 21:12
Joe, back in high school you looked like Tom Cruise if he were slightly more Asian.

Also, dashing in a suit.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 14 Nov 2007, 21:36
GUESS WHO HAS A CRAPPY NEW WEBCAM

(http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j125/allylester/Picture006.jpg)


IT IS ME
I HAVE A CRAPPY NEW WEBCAM

(http://i79.photobucket.com/albums/j125/allylester/Picture005.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 14 Nov 2007, 21:40
Joe, back in high school you looked like Tom Cruise if he were slightly more Asian.

Wait. You mean he's not the older dude in the sunglasses?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 14 Nov 2007, 21:43
jhocking, it looks like you went to school in Irvine, California.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 14 Nov 2007, 22:20
Joe, back in high school you looked like Tom Cruise if he were slightly more Asian.

Also, dashing in a suit.

I think he looks kinda like Bill-and-Ted's-era Keanu. Might just be the hair, though.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 14 Nov 2007, 22:23
Stop insulting Joe guys.  It's not very nice of you.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 15 Nov 2007, 02:12
How much did the plain-clothes security guard to your immediate left cost anyhow, Joe?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 15 Nov 2007, 02:18
Stop insulting Joe guys.  It's not very nice of you.

Silly Dan. Everyone knows Asians don't have feelings.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 15 Nov 2007, 06:57
How much did the plain-clothes security guard to your immediate left cost anyhow, Joe?
hee hee he kinda does look like he's talking into a secret service-style earpiece.

I better post another picture to make up for all this chatter:
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y120/jhocking/amst.jpg)
This was from a trip to Amsterdam a few years ago. In every single picture of me from that trip, I am leaning to the left. Apparently I hunch to the left when it is bitterly cold.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 15 Nov 2007, 08:16
Where did everyone go?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 15 Nov 2007, 08:24
It was cold, they all went inside.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 15 Nov 2007, 08:52
I think everyone in the entire country was at the anti-war rally. This was right around when Bush decided to attack Iraq. Nobody paid any attention to me, but my gf and her friend had colorful Land's End-style jackets that screamed American tourist and they got jeered a lot. Every time we got within a block of the marchers, I pretended not to know them.


Okay that last sentence isn't true, but I kept joking about it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: StMonkey on 15 Nov 2007, 09:25
(http://i11.tinypic.com/81oz2vo.jpg)

This was me earlier this year from prom. I rocked that zoot suit like nobodies mother. Not really, but I wanted to use the hat and chain.

(http://i11.tinypic.com/72u41hl.jpg)

This is probably the best picture I have of me from anytime in the last five years. And it still looks rather not like me. The girl is, obviously, my date.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Aimless on 15 Nov 2007, 12:08
Being a hermit sucked, so I went into the common room to get some human company!

(http://img46.imageshack.us/img46/4769/backtolifevv0.jpg)

That'll do for a couple of weeks. Or until I find a pic of me with Roderick Mckinnon and JM Coetzee in a frock-coat and HUGE lambchops :|

Btw Jamie your hair looks AMAZING there! Whatever it cost, however long it took... SO worth it. IMO but I have no hair.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jenter888 on 15 Nov 2007, 12:28
This is what my hair looked like after I took out all the pins holding it in place. Once I scan in the professional photos from my formal, I will post them up.

(http://img158.imageshack.us/img158/8560/pb110077zv4.jpg)



you are to cute for the internet
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 15 Nov 2007, 12:39
Hey chipmunk, please don't quote photos. Especially to make creepy and gramatically incorrect comments.

With your....Crazy Town avatar. What....nice boys they seem. Crippens.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 15 Nov 2007, 14:39
I rocked that zoot suit like nobodies mother. Not really, but I wanted to use the hat and chain.

That's the tightest-fitting zoot suit I've ever seen . . .
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Chrasstor on 15 Nov 2007, 15:48
I think a bit of shag suits you Sam...

I'm not gay, so you'd have to get a lady's opinion-but a yay from me.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 15 Nov 2007, 15:53
I too, require confirmation.

I suspect that Sam is now a Genuine, Southern Fried slice of HottSexx.

Please confirm that Sam is now a Genuine, Southern Fried slice of Hottsexx.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 15 Nov 2007, 16:13
Tommy, here is your confirmation: Sam, you look pretty darn good with two weeks of stubbly.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 15 Nov 2007, 16:28
I agree, Sam. Hot shit that beard is.

This makes me wonder what you'd look like with short hair.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 15 Nov 2007, 16:43
Sam, shave your hair. I guarantee 1000x sexy.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 15 Nov 2007, 17:04
Sam, I shouldn't ever feel even slightly attracted to you. That picture made me dislike myself a little bit. Maybe you should shave your beard.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 15 Nov 2007, 17:08
I don't mean bald, just a grade 2 or 3. Much sexy!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 15 Nov 2007, 17:36
Man, maybe I should've participated in NaBeGroMo.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 15 Nov 2007, 17:52
Sam should not shave his head. Sam is rocking the ever living shit out of the awkward comedian look and it suits him quite well. Stop fucking with a good thing you cock-knockers.

Sam, keep the scruff. It works.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Unosuke on 15 Nov 2007, 17:57
I am in need of a new do (and possibly a shave) any suggestions?

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v361/Unosuke/Picture747.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 15 Nov 2007, 18:14
Uno, shave
Sam, stop being underage plz
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: BobJoeJim on 15 Nov 2007, 18:20
The Ducks are now #2 in the BCS!!!

(pictar)

I'm serious.

Somebody had better make a damn awesome shop of this.
So is this not gonna happen?  I was looking forward to seeing the results...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 15 Nov 2007, 19:04
Are you seriously asking this? That shit was days ago. Move on.

(http://a605.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/63/l_fcaa4e0067cb6cdd25428ada8a98906c.jpg)

Guys, I am not making my usual face in this. Also, it was not my birthday. I just wanted to try to bite the balloon. (They wouldn't let me...)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 15 Nov 2007, 19:11
sam, hot. i'm glad you're underage.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 15 Nov 2007, 19:13
I just wanted to try to bite the balloon.

Oh sure, "I wanted to bite the balloon" he says. Sure thing, Chuck. Don't listen to him desperately trying to keep up his curmudgeonly image, guys. He was actually staring at the colours with child-like glee. His mouth is open with awe-inspired delight.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 15 Nov 2007, 19:15
(http://www.pretentiousgamer.com/photos/oh.jpg)

(http://www.pretentiousgamer.com/photos/my.jpg)

(http://www.pretentiousgamer.com/photos/god.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 15 Nov 2007, 19:36
Welp, there goes my chance of ever finding a woman...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: StMonkey on 15 Nov 2007, 19:51
(close-ups of Chucks face)

Is that a look of sheer terror or uncontrolable lust?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 15 Nov 2007, 19:55
Genius work with the file names.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 15 Nov 2007, 19:57
Yeah, I see totally amazed by the pretty colors and largeness of the balloon.

And Sam, no, you should not cut your hair and, yes, the scruff works for you. (I can't say much else without feeling really really creepy.)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 15 Nov 2007, 20:24
Damn Sam, you're a fox.

And I am growing a fucking beard.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: squawk on 15 Nov 2007, 20:30
I'm older than Sam by about a month, I believe. Neato.

Recently I have been honing my skills with these:
(http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n217/rageaholicdove/11152007.jpg)

and why can't i resist the urge to give a thumbs up in every friggin' picture
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 15 Nov 2007, 21:02
The thumbs up thing is awesome, actually.

I'm either older or younger than Sam by a month but keep forgetting which it is. April 18th?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 16 Nov 2007, 00:31
This is my brother and I at my formal (he was not my date guys).  Look at me, a pretty nerd princess with braces. awww.  I took two dates (a boy and a girl) and made them dress as pirates.  I have photos somewhere, shall endevour to find.
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/jundybumby.jpg)
This is me and a friend at her formal last year...no, year before.
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/hannahform3.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Felix_ on 16 Nov 2007, 00:40
me, at the camping area of the worlds most awesome brutal death metal & grindcore festival ever

(http://img61.imageshack.us/img61/3847/49756733xu5.jpg)



Nice Atheist shirt.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 16 Nov 2007, 03:15
Please don't quote pictures, Cherub.

Send a PM for idle personal comments.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: godinpants on 16 Nov 2007, 03:15
Recently I have been honing my skills with these:

I have the same keyboard. Im making music with mine right now.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/grommit/Photo5.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 16 Nov 2007, 04:11
This is my brother and I at my formal (he was not my date guys).
holy shit your family is skinny
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 16 Nov 2007, 05:42
Those keyboards look awesome.

I took two dates (a boy and a girl) and made them dress as pirates.

Victory.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: CmonMiracle on 16 Nov 2007, 08:19
Summary of the last few pages: Everyone is hot!

Picture to not be a yapper.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v610/forgettheflowers/hjff10382copyui7.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 16 Nov 2007, 11:03
A+ Would look again.

(http://img65.imageshack.us/img65/7325/1001039zp5.jpg)

HOORAY I bought a new old Olympus Pen EE-2.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 16 Nov 2007, 11:40
My hair is getting awkward so here is a facial expression to match it!
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Skibas_clavicle/awkward.jpg)
ALSO, I just found this picture! I was blowing a bubble, my teeth aren't actually blue.
(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y67/Skibas_clavicle/goingtoairport.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 16 Nov 2007, 11:49
You justify Kieffer's ego.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 16 Nov 2007, 12:55
Aw you say the sweetest things.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: a pack of wolves on 16 Nov 2007, 12:56
I suppose this is also a report on NaBeGroMo progress since I haven't shaved since Halloween, even though I wasn't *planning* on participating.

Accidental seasonal beard growth has also occurred to me.

Before:
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y130/L_Dopa/Photo6.jpg)

Now:
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y130/L_Dopa/Photo8.jpg)

I am unsure as to whether this is an improvement or not, but I do have warmer cheeks and it definitely goes with this hat and shirt.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 16 Nov 2007, 15:45
From what I can see, I'd say improvement.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Katherine on 16 Nov 2007, 16:20
I colored my hair last night, here are the before and after pictures.  I'm still not sure I like the color.  Its a bit darker than I was expecting, I may have to throw some highlights in shortly.
Before:
(http://lh3.google.com/lotsacats/Rz4vUMZ0ixI/AAAAAAAAA-c/mE05ChukrfU/blonde.jpg)
After:
(http://lh6.google.com/lotsacats/Rz4vO8Z0iwI/AAAAAAAAA-U/FEKCZOS82R0/red.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 16 Nov 2007, 17:30
I am unsure as to whether this is an improvement or not, but I do have warmer cheeks and it definitely goes with this hat and shirt.

In the second photo, you look a little like Cillian Murphy, or some other dashing rogue Englishman.

Maybe Ewan Mcgregor.

But I think it is the angle.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: a pack of wolves on 16 Nov 2007, 17:44
I can pretend it's not though. At the very least it's geographically correct.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 16 Nov 2007, 18:40
(http://www.pretentiousgamer.com/photos/weaktoo.JPG)

I am not satisfied with this beard thing...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: a pack of wolves on 16 Nov 2007, 18:47
I think it would rather suit you, it just needs to grow out a little more. It's at that awkward interim stage at the moment, sort of like facial hair's equivalent of being a teenager.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: David_Dovey on 16 Nov 2007, 19:29
A+ Would look again.

Dan you kind of look like a soccer hooligan, interestingly enough I think it suits you.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: dennis on 16 Nov 2007, 19:36
I like my hat, though most of my friends don't.
It's uncanny how much you look like me.

My hair is getting long.

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2359/1910842898_6d434d5df5.jpg)

Hey guys! Haven't been here in a while. What is new?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: David_Dovey on 16 Nov 2007, 21:47
I own a lot of shirts. Here is some of them.

(http://i9.photobucket.com/albums/a55/ddovey/shirtgif.gif)

(there's 41 frames in this gif)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: godinpants on 16 Nov 2007, 22:49
It's hypnotic.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 16 Nov 2007, 23:10
hey dennis is there something in your eye



(also you are kind of hot kthx)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 17 Nov 2007, 00:36
Lookin' good, Dan.

I'd go with dark brown leather, personally.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 17 Nov 2007, 00:55
Purple.

No, wait!

Chartreuse.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 17 Nov 2007, 01:51
It came . . . from the
KITCHEN CUPBOARD!!!

(http://www.inlisub.com/assets/PotatoMonster.JPG)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 17 Nov 2007, 02:04

In the second photo, you look a little like Cillian Murphy, or some other dashing rogue Englishman.

Maybe Ewan Mcgregor.

But I think it is the angle.

I'm sure Mr McGregor will appreciate being referred to as English

 :-P
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 17 Nov 2007, 03:19
#1 Inlander for best Photo Thread Picture '07


Here is a picture of me that pales in comparison

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2346/2024773362_141fe58ddc.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 17 Nov 2007, 05:43
Amazing, your skin turned to wax! Is this a Colossus-style superpower?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 17 Nov 2007, 05:50
Um what
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 17 Nov 2007, 06:09
shitty joke, do not be alarmed
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ladybug on 17 Nov 2007, 10:49
I'm late with the compliments, but Sam, the scruff suits you. Looks good.

Picture, to justify the post or something:
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v26/mariasha/Bilde251.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 17 Nov 2007, 11:36
OH MY GOD THERE'S A SPIDER ON YOUR CHEST


AND YOU HAVE NO HEAD
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 17 Nov 2007, 12:12
THE SPIDER ATE HER HEAD AND LEFT BUT A STUMP. DO YOU NOT SEE THE CONNECTION?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: schimmy on 17 Nov 2007, 12:24
Dear QC. Should I wear shirts? Yes? No? Suggestions?
(http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee300/n1xxa1/shirt.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 17 Nov 2007, 12:45
Not those shirts, fo sho. The plain one is boring on its own and the one on the right looks like something a 13 year old wears to wedding receptions and shit. Find something with sown on/in patterns.

(http://img80.imageshack.us/img80/1378/1001102va7.jpg)
(http://img68.imageshack.us/img68/4015/1001104ky4.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: supersheep on 17 Nov 2007, 12:52
You could try wearing the plain one with a jacket or tie for added interest. The right-hand one, though, I concure with Dan on.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: schimmy on 17 Nov 2007, 13:06
You can't see it too well in the picture, but there are two plain ones. The left-most one is pink, the centre one is white.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 17 Nov 2007, 13:53
The pink one is pink, which is cliche.

The middle one is too baggy.

The last one makes it to clear that you are not, in fact, a cowboy.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 17 Nov 2007, 16:51
Unless you plan on putting on a tie of some kind, leave the top button of the shirt undone. Especially if you're wearing the shirt with jeans. Otherwise you'll look like the biggest square in coolsville.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 17 Nov 2007, 17:11
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN8655.jpg)

I got a new jacket!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 17 Nov 2007, 17:16
With . . . two zippers?!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 17 Nov 2007, 17:32
well, the one on the left is the one that zips all the way down. The other one goes partially and has a flap thing...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 17 Nov 2007, 19:04
Makes no sense!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tehz on 17 Nov 2007, 19:28
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v208/kalnaar_khan/1117072222.jpg)

RAAAGGGHHHHH I'M EATIN' A CLEMENTINE
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 17 Nov 2007, 19:42
New (old) theme: OMNOMNOMNOM

(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v71/212/23/1280790034/n1280790034_30006894_6025.jpg)

Eating a black and white cookie. In sepia. (Old photo = long ass hair)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 17 Nov 2007, 19:54
holy shit your family is skinny

Our parents starved us as children.  ok thats a lie, we just take after our mother.  Fast metabolism means no reason to exercise and no reason to not eat KFC tonight!

Here is the picture I'm sure you were all waiting for with baited breath.  me and my pirate dates.  I loved my formal, I had the best time.
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/meformalme.jpg)

Also guys, I finished uni forever this week.  Grown up for the win!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 17 Nov 2007, 20:17
The girl you went with is cute. The guy looks 12.

Also how old are you.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 17 Nov 2007, 20:23
I was 16 then.  I am almost 21 now.
The guy was like 15 I think, and the girl is one of my best friends and is totally hot.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 17 Nov 2007, 20:30
Yeah I would really happily fuck the shit out of her
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 17 Nov 2007, 20:32
I'm sure she'll be thrilled.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 17 Nov 2007, 21:09
New (old) theme: OMNOMNOMNOM
It's not quite OMNOMNOM, but close enough:

(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v159/240/15/33810414/n33810414_32052154_7313.jpg)

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 17 Nov 2007, 21:28
You look very surprised by that bubble.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 17 Nov 2007, 21:31
hey there.

(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v157/17/107/590798486/n590798486_458439_833.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 17 Nov 2007, 21:48
Hahaha ruyi, awesome.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 17 Nov 2007, 21:49
I'm sure she'll be thrilled.

You can come too.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 17 Nov 2007, 21:52
In Kieffer-speak, this is actually a compliment.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: celticgeek on 17 Nov 2007, 22:02
Also guys, I finished uni forever this week.  Grown up for the win!

Hooray for finishing uni forever.  And becoming a grown up.

I should note that I finally stopped taking uni classes in 2004.  However, I don't think that I have grown up yet.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 17 Nov 2007, 22:21
As of Monday the 26th I'll have finished my Bachelor degree. After that I'm basically looking at another 4 years of uni. Woo.

Also, new kicks!

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/jimmy5times/DSCF0325.jpg)

And they are boots too, which means they fit in with my only-wearing-boots decision.

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/jimmy5times/DSCF0326.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 17 Nov 2007, 22:30
You look very surprised by that bubble.
It's a pretty good bubble. Also there was one with me not looking surprised that didn't look right.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 17 Nov 2007, 23:22
New (old) theme: OMNOMNOMNOM

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/omnom.jpg)?

Also, nice shoes there, Squiddy. Very classy!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 17 Nov 2007, 23:26
new kicks

Those are some snazzy shoes.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Napoleon the Clown on 17 Nov 2007, 23:49
So I was at ShopKo and saw something interesting...

(http://i2.photobucket.com/albums/y43/NapoleontheClown/Picture20.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 18 Nov 2007, 12:24
Sam, let me be the first to say that those are some truly fly fucking kicks, homeslice.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: KTkat on 18 Nov 2007, 14:53
Yay orange shoes!

Also, picture from a ball at the Met that I already posted in the Mafia thread (I'm on the left):
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a361/KikkiTehCameraWhore/me.jpg)
Yay having an excuse to dress up! Double-yay that it was free.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 18 Nov 2007, 15:05
Damn Sam, those are fucking awesome.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 18 Nov 2007, 17:18
I finally got my camera back! Yay!

Just in time for the cold New England weather:
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PB180073.jpg)

Also, I totally gave up on the Novembeard. I just don't have what it takes. Sorry, guys.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PB180075.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 18 Nov 2007, 18:34
Also, I totally gave up on the Novembeard. I just don't have what it takes. Sorry, guys.
image

Please don't cut open my head with your mind and eat my brain, thanks.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 18 Nov 2007, 18:57
I've always wondered what makes you tick, Oz...
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PB180002.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: vegkitkat on 18 Nov 2007, 19:01
I had my semi-formal this Friday. I was clearly really excited about it.
(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/5828/1000246hz4.jpg)

Myself and Mr Kat cuddling up on the couches:
(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/9676/1000232ga3.jpg)

And our lame (or promtastic) picture by the murally thingy we put up:
(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/2122/1000236ew7.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 18 Nov 2007, 19:03
Telling a story with shitty webcam photos!

I am trying to do this stupid writing assignment.

(http://img216.imageshack.us/img216/1157/webcam2007111818582bx8.png)

I do not like this class very much.

(http://img219.imageshack.us/img219/3384/webcam2007111818581pb0.png)

It is not going very well.

(http://img172.imageshack.us/img172/4089/webcam200711181859pu9.png)

Hooray for the awesome glare that makes me look really really pale!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Dimmukane on 18 Nov 2007, 20:22
Obsessions (is it John?), when I think about the zombie apocalypse and who I'd wanna be around when it happens, your pictures come to mind first.  It doesn't matter if you hate zombies and don't know anything about them, you look like you're fuckin' ready.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 18 Nov 2007, 20:27
Did someone say shitty webcam photos?

(http://img204.imageshack.us/img204/7852/picture9kv5.jpg) (http://imageshack.us)

How is it possible to go to work but not leave Internet. Someone invent networked espresso machine please.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 18 Nov 2007, 20:32
Most coffee shops these days have wireless. Bring a laptop to work.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 18 Nov 2007, 20:41
Lunchy, that is my favorite picture of you in months.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Gryff on 18 Nov 2007, 20:51
Today is my birthday! My ladyfriend made me a cake:

(http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c278/gazmund/specialcake1.jpg)

I was pretty happy about the cake:

(http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c278/gazmund/specialcake2.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 18 Nov 2007, 20:55
I love you Gryff!
Thankyou Ozy!
Also jho, my cafe does have wireless! The problem is that when I am at work, I need to, you know. Work.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: E. Spaceman on 18 Nov 2007, 21:09
BEST BIRTHDAY CAKE EVER
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 18 Nov 2007, 21:19
This photo has my thigh in it.

(http://www.inlisub.com/assets/Hedda1.JPG)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 18 Nov 2007, 21:37
Gryff, you look just like the dude who stole my Wii and projector a few months back.

Obsessions (is it John?), when I think about the zombie apocalypse and who I'd wanna be around when it happens, your pictures come to mind first.  It doesn't matter if you hate zombies and don't know anything about them, you look like you're fuckin' ready.

Oh...I know.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/P9220003.jpg)
(Sure, I've posted it here already, but it bears repeating)

And for the sake of a new picture:
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PB180003.jpg)
The resemblance is unfuckingcanny!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 18 Nov 2007, 21:42
That shotgun is a pretty good gun, if a little unreliable.

I really like the cheap Nerf knock-off battery powered Tommy gun.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 18 Nov 2007, 21:48
Wal-Mart was sold out. In a zombie outbreak, you make due with what's at hand.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: DonInKansas on 19 Nov 2007, 01:40
Horrid picture of me before my cousin's wedding.

*Insert Piano Man joke here*
(http://i153.photobucket.com/albums/s207/DonInKansas/Yahoo%20Photo%20Album/1ef9.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: David_Dovey on 19 Nov 2007, 04:22
AWESOME CAKE

Knowing that you eventually have to eat Phillipe's face is the saddest thing.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 19 Nov 2007, 04:27
eat Phillipe's face

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/jimmy5times/autaux.gif)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SusurrusIgnoramus on 19 Nov 2007, 06:57
leave it to phillipe to think that getting his face cut off and made into dog food is somehow his fault.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 19 Nov 2007, 10:09
Gryff, that cake is flippin fantastic. Your lady friend is probably very awesome.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LiterSize on 19 Nov 2007, 10:22
Looks about right....

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/Xtract/random/1aa0e67b.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 19 Nov 2007, 15:36
Man, this is gonna be a good week:)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v352/redglasscurls/Narcissism/cheer.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Cartilage Head on 19 Nov 2007, 15:47
 Oh by the way Brian/ Bryan/ Storm Rider.

 I forgot to say that your hair looks about a million times better than I remember it last looking.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 19 Nov 2007, 15:53
Thanks, dude. I am sort of considering getting it cut, because it is getting pretty long. Gabbly's opinions on the matter have been mixed. Some people say I should cut it, some people say I should grow it out even more.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 19 Nov 2007, 15:57
It is too hot for long pants, so I bought shorts and am wearing them!
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/me/newshorts.jpg)
these ones actually fit me properly, unlike my other shorts that length.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: cheesepie on 19 Nov 2007, 18:14
Me and my best friend Tom made a breakfast of epic proportions this past weekend.

Sausage, Bacon, Havarti, 2 fried Eggs, Tomatoe with Mint, Basil and Chive in an Apple+Balsamic Vinaigrette, Home Fries, Capers, Salad.
(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v152/29/29/90408773/n90408773_33887404_5526.jpg)

Also, Orange Grapefruit juice paired with Kenyan AA coffee to match the acidity/citrus
(http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v152/29/29/90408773/n90408773_33887405_5750.jpg)

Me in bliss during indulgence:
(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v152/29/29/90408773/n90408773_33887410_6924.jpg)

Tom, defeated post-meal:
(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v152/29/29/90408773/n90408773_33887414_7865.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 19 Nov 2007, 19:55
A fine breakfast, sir.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 20 Nov 2007, 01:35
You can come too.

Finally, my life has meaning.

Also, I got new glasses guys.  They are trendy and a bit awesome.  I found myself unable to take a photo without a rediculous expression for some reason though.
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0907.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 20 Nov 2007, 01:43
You could be one of those indie internet kinda-porn girls who are kinda like Suicide Girls, but actually have their own website and don't dress silly and 'edgy' just to fit in with the rest of the website and also do neat stuff that is totally non-porn related.

That actually sounded like more of a complement in my head.

I'm saying you look neat.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 20 Nov 2007, 01:46
.....

.......

Thank....you?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 20 Nov 2007, 02:43
I REALLY like your glasses ebony_willow!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 20 Nov 2007, 03:25
Why are you using Miss Princy as your avatar?  :?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 20 Nov 2007, 03:29
(Psst! It is Princy. Check out her profile and her last posts.)

I bought clothes today, but was too lazy to take photos. I promise to take some tomorrow, though. Pictures will be here later, kay?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 20 Nov 2007, 05:32
Nothing too racy now, y'hear? Those shorts were scandalous. *wags finger*
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ZJGent on 20 Nov 2007, 09:53
Money Honey

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v330/zeejay_djinn/elvis1.jpg)

A-huh-huh-huh.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 20 Nov 2007, 11:27
It must be weird to hear an Elvis impersonator speaking with a British accent...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 20 Nov 2007, 12:28
Here's what my hair looked like after I dried it off after my shower!

(http://img228.imageshack.us/img228/9244/webcam200711201223vn2.png)

Now if you'll excuse me, I'm off to perfect my doomsday device.

Also, there's an 'All Shook Up' joke to make in response to Roddy's picture, but I won't make it because of the shame brought about by such punnery.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 20 Nov 2007, 14:42
This picture counts because my hand is in it...

This is the only correct way to wear uggs. With FIRE
(http://photos-266.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v149/77/17/5739266/n5739266_36720039_331.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 20 Nov 2007, 14:54
Manda, if ever you were to change your avatar, it would have to be to that.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 20 Nov 2007, 15:38
Amanda, I love you. So much.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 20 Nov 2007, 16:33
Are these shorts demure enough for you, Joey?
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/me/redshorts1.jpg)
Plus, new top
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/me/newclothes.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 20 Nov 2007, 16:34
Eris,
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 20 Nov 2007, 16:35
I've pretty sure you should never wear that top with those shorts.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 20 Nov 2007, 17:06
Flaming Ugly ass boots

...magnificent.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 20 Nov 2007, 17:41
I REALLY like your glasses ebony_willow!

Thanks, me too!

(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0929.jpg)
I just finished work.  I am sleepy.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 20 Nov 2007, 18:36
What's above and to the side of your camera that's always so interesting?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: est on 20 Nov 2007, 18:41
(hot)

huagl,
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 20 Nov 2007, 18:55
Ozy, I don't know.  It's a dumb habit I have.  I always seem to look more retarded when I look directly into the camera.  I also always tilt my head a bit.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 20 Nov 2007, 20:31
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN87100001.jpg)

I fell asleep. Surprisingly, I wasn't lying on the floor or in the middle of the road (I tend to do that).
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 21 Nov 2007, 10:00
I like you Sam, but I hate that you're taller, better looking and manlier than I am.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 21 Nov 2007, 10:08
i am so surly right now.

I read this as "I am so ugly right now" about five times and I was going to yell at you for being silly.

Also, Darryl, don't be hard on yourself. You're a good-looking dude as well.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 21 Nov 2007, 10:33
Sam ya look like a danged mexican.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pen on 21 Nov 2007, 10:35
Yes.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 21 Nov 2007, 10:38
You know, he says he's from Texas but I bet he actually lives a little south of the border.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: schimmy on 21 Nov 2007, 12:53
Went into Manchester on a whim after school with my best friend. He bought me shoes!*
(http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee300/n1xxa1/027.jpg)


*I actually have to pay him back tomorrow, but whatever.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 21 Nov 2007, 15:33
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/me/hellyeah.jpg)
Fuckin' Hell Yeah!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 21 Nov 2007, 15:50
Sam ya look like a danged mexican.

If he's a mexican where is his ding danged lawn mower?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 21 Nov 2007, 15:55
Also, Darryl, don't be hard on yourself. We can't all be Sam.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 21 Nov 2007, 16:19
Aww, be nice to the guy. I mean, it's true, we can't all be Sam, but don't take away his hope!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 21 Nov 2007, 16:28
i am so sexy right now.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 21 Nov 2007, 16:46
I wish I were Sam.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 21 Nov 2007, 16:49
He is Sam, you fucking dipshit.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 21 Nov 2007, 16:51
I both respect and admire you, Jon.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mnementh on 21 Nov 2007, 16:54
I just kicked huda in the vagoo so hard she came, I'm more of a man then any of you will ever be, except chuck, who once cold shot a man.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 21 Nov 2007, 17:06
Fuckin' Hell Yeah!

Oh dang, congrats, I'm glad you're an ocean away.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 21 Nov 2007, 19:41
Sam ya look like a danged mexican.

If he's a mexican where is his ding danged lawn mower?

Don't be racist
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 21 Nov 2007, 19:45
Formal photo!
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2010/2053976012_47fb3afaf7.jpg?v=0)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 21 Nov 2007, 20:00
Jamie, that is one hell of creepy smile...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: celticgeek on 21 Nov 2007, 20:01
I think that she's about to attack the photographer.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 21 Nov 2007, 20:02
The photographer was my mother and she was continually trying to get me to smile and I didn't want to. I guess that explains it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: bluebird on 22 Nov 2007, 00:21
(http://i118.photobucket.com/albums/o108/Bluebird72/13th-1.jpg?t=1195719579)

Please excuse the poor image quality, I don't have a proper camera.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 22 Nov 2007, 01:01
I am going to pretend you are as cute as you look in that picture, and didn't just abuse the fuck out of some myspace angles.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: dennis on 22 Nov 2007, 02:25
Hello there, bluebird.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 22 Nov 2007, 02:35
SGR SHIRT DAY IS TODAY
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2117/2053665377_f1222a9f3a.jpg)

Also I sent pictures to John and he liked them so much I get another shirt! Woohoo!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 22 Nov 2007, 08:45
What?

God damn it.

I need tits.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Skibas_clavicle on 22 Nov 2007, 09:11
FLASHBACK TO HIGH SCHOOL! "Senior year" aka grade 12.
(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v150/152/123/48902323/n48902323_38418795_6300.jpg)

Back when I had black hair and no face-metal and the gauge of my ears was significantly smaller.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: bluebird on 22 Nov 2007, 13:15
I am going to pretend you are as cute as you look in that picture, and didn't just abuse the fuck out of some myspace angles.

I'm pretty sure that's what I actually look like, so thank you?

Hello there, bluebird.

Hello!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 22 Nov 2007, 14:06
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN8922.jpg)

My and my friends hung out after school. We ran into the JROTC kids at one point...scary...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 22 Nov 2007, 19:55
My friend Maggie and me after we got out of club Apex in Dupont.  We were pretending to be hookers.

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b131/sutekitatakai/hookers.jpg)

Three of us right after we got out of the club.  That's why we're so sweaty.
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b131/sutekitatakai/IMG_3391.jpg)

 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Cartilage Head on 22 Nov 2007, 21:34
Jeezum Crow.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 22 Nov 2007, 23:00
Woah your lady friend is saucy
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: fatty on 23 Nov 2007, 00:45
sup QC, hows it hanging?
(http://i91.photobucket.com/albums/k303/aka-fatty/IMG_8366.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: bluebird on 23 Nov 2007, 01:27
I like your socks.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 23 Nov 2007, 08:23
Thanksgiving means staring contests with old friends
(http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v157/193/1/50803508/n50803508_30471857_5026.jpg)
I so won that shit
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ziltoid1014 on 23 Nov 2007, 16:07
error in post, unable to delete, only modify sry
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ziltoid1014 on 23 Nov 2007, 16:29
Psalm 23:...His sword and his axe, they comfort me...
(http://i236.photobucket.com/albums/ff264/ziltoid1014/P1010140.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 23 Nov 2007, 17:00
Fatty,
(I like your belt...still...)

Also, I found pictures from summer. Yay graffiti

(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN6524.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: IronOxide on 23 Nov 2007, 19:23
Psalm 23:...His sword and his axe, they comfort me...

A+ would read again.

Also,

Ali,
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: squawk on 23 Nov 2007, 23:08
We got a new bird, Yoshi.
Yoshi attempts to eat camera; fails.

(http://i113.photobucket.com/albums/n217/rageaholicdove/nov/11232007029.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: BobJoeJim on 24 Nov 2007, 00:16
NaBeGroMo update:

(http://i224.photobucket.com/albums/dd18/BobJoeJim22/112307Work.jpg)

I won't quite get a full month of growth in though, because I plan to shave before my Nov. 28th court date.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 24 Nov 2007, 00:22
Give me your beard genes.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 24 Nov 2007, 04:59
I won't quite get a full month of growth in though, because I plan to shave before my Nov. 28th court date.

I think a beard would only hinder your case if you were a crazy murderer.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: E. Spaceman on 24 Nov 2007, 09:08
I think that if you trim and shjape a bit, you would actually look pretty darn respectable!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: CmonMiracle on 24 Nov 2007, 11:28
This is my (still broken) car. I still have hope for it.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v610/forgettheflowers/885c6012.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 24 Nov 2007, 11:30
Lolita,
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 24 Nov 2007, 12:52
Why the hell does Jen still live in the 1970s while the rest of us losers are in the 2000s? That's not fair.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: BobJoeJim on 24 Nov 2007, 13:08
I think that if you trim and shape a bit, you would actually look pretty darn respectable!
Well yeah, but as soon as I start trimming it pretty much kills the NaBeGroMo factor, which is the only reason I have the beard right now anyway.  I will keep the goatee which I actually like.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 24 Nov 2007, 14:28
Hey, look what I found!

(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/Mosag/Foto126.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 24 Nov 2007, 16:24
Serious business.
(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b131/sutekitatakai/MyPicture-19.jpg)

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ziltoid1014 on 24 Nov 2007, 16:55
Psalm 23:...His sword and his axe, they comfort me...

A+ would read again.

Also,

Ali,

make more sense!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 24 Nov 2007, 18:11
(http://www.pretentiousgamer.com/photos/pickvamp.jpg)

I vant to suck your chords.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Unosuke on 24 Nov 2007, 20:01
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v361/Unosuke/002_0A.jpg)
So I got one of those lomography cameras
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 25 Nov 2007, 00:18
Yesterday one of my mates from uni had his 21st birthday party. He wanted a theme and decided to have a White Party (basically everyone has to wear all white). Unfortunately not only do I not like wearing white, I also don't have any white clothes because I only ever wear black. Anyway it basically turned out that not only were my girlfriend and I the only people at this party not wearing white, I was also wearing exactly what my friend was wearing but in black. And I mean exactly, right down to the brand of shirt.

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/jimmy5times/DSCF0327.gif)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 25 Nov 2007, 00:22
(http://img410.imageshack.us/img410/2324/webcam200711250019gi9.png)

Seriously my hair is getting goddamn long.

EDIT: also hot damn this webcam is shitty
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 25 Nov 2007, 01:14
I slept with one of my hot friends on Thanksgiving.







No, seriously I slept with her lol

(http://img48.imageshack.us/img48/258/6u94nc7ip0.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 25 Nov 2007, 10:03
It looks more like you slept on her.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Drill King on 25 Nov 2007, 10:10
I must say, not to sound creepy, for a webcomic with as many geeky/obscure references as is, and a robot, this is certainly a very good looking fan base.

If you know what I mean.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 25 Nov 2007, 10:35
The title claims this thread does not bow to historical revisionism, yet I'm pretty sure posts have been deleted since I left for Thanksgiving. SHENANIGANS
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 25 Nov 2007, 15:35
Drill King, that fact gets pointed out at least ten times per photothread. It think it has been decided that most forumites are masquerading as people better looking than they actually are.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 25 Nov 2007, 15:50
Do you mean to imply that my exceptional good looks are all a filthy lie? I don't like you anymore :(

It looks more like you slept on her.

I like being on top.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 25 Nov 2007, 15:57
I'm okay with that.

Here is a photo because we haven't had one in a while.

(http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v79/191/95/885580006/n885580006_302265_837.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Yakob on 25 Nov 2007, 19:00
Alright guys, thread's over. Move along, nothing to see here.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Unosuke on 25 Nov 2007, 19:02
All Sam can say is that his life is pretty plain.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 25 Nov 2007, 19:24
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PB230022.jpg)
Yeah, I get it. My tattoo looks like a pretzel.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PB230025.jpg)
I weigh just shy of 160 pounds.

That dude, my friend Mike, weighs about 280. I did not get far.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 25 Nov 2007, 19:25
Oh, dang. You and I weigh about the same.

Why are you so much sexier than me?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 25 Nov 2007, 19:36
Top class breeding, Oz.

I have a pick too, guys:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PB250004.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 25 Nov 2007, 20:39
Okay so it appears that I am now brunette.
Next to chop most of this pesky hair off.

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2008/2064224047_402cd26b0c.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 25 Nov 2007, 21:06
sam


sam



sam
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 25 Nov 2007, 23:38
Sam
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: est on 26 Nov 2007, 04:52
hola.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v371/est_xplosif/est_dixlol.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 26 Nov 2007, 04:54
Next to chop most of this pesky hair off.

But it looks really good!

Est, that is a furious looking dong.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: est on 26 Nov 2007, 05:04
It is in the process of springing into action
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Dimmukane on 26 Nov 2007, 07:59
This was on Black Friday, at work, in the bathroom.  Notice the fire alarm in the background.  I was tempted to pull that more than once.

(http://i201.photobucket.com/albums/aa284/Dimmukane/blackfriday.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 26 Nov 2007, 08:06
Man. I wish I had time go to the bathroom to hold personal photo shoots while working on Black Friday in prior years.

Fuck, I wish I had time to go to the bathroom period while working on Black Friday in prior years.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Dimmukane on 26 Nov 2007, 08:40
They actually gave us breaks.  I was surprised.  Usually all the new seasonal people try to call out and mess up the break schedule so instead of having 2 we got none or vice versa.  This year we got lucky, I guess.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 26 Nov 2007, 08:46
When I worked retail, it was well known that everyone was replaceable. Unless you asked for it off in like July (And you needed a solid reason), Black Friday was a mandatory work day. If a seasonal didn't show up for Black Friday, they were cut loose and replaced.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Dimmukane on 26 Nov 2007, 09:15
I know, that's what happened last year, with at least 5 people.  This year only one person pulled that, and they're gone.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 26 Nov 2007, 11:48
Oh awesome that is so radical Sam

Here is a whole-sized Snickers bar

(http://www.ncym-fum.org/Young_Adult/Exam/energy_snickers.gif)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 26 Nov 2007, 15:57
Opinions, folks:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PB260008.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/P8080002.jpg)

That's my hair as it stands presently (Top). Should I keep growing it, or give up and go back to shaving it (Bottom)?

Edit: Added picture of shaved head for comparison's sake.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 26 Nov 2007, 16:27
Oooh, that jaw! I think my heart's explodin'! THAT JAW!

Bonus points: +5 for the strip being linked within the hour, +5 for remembering an old strip.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Drill King on 26 Nov 2007, 16:28
Maybe a little longer, but keep it pretty short. But if you ever lose the facial hair(don't, it's manly) grow it out longer.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ummmkay on 26 Nov 2007, 17:07
If I am remembering the right pictures, I vote go back to really short/shaved hair.

You should probably post some for comparison though.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 26 Nov 2007, 17:16
Holy shit dude, you kindof look like this Romanian dude I worked with this summer. He was awesome but I secretly hated him 'cause all the hawt ladies in the drive-thru would always be like "Sup where's Andrei?" and nobody ever asked for me.

All this to say, I hate you because you're pretty.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 26 Nov 2007, 17:34
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0957b.jpg)
Hi guys!  Today I have been cleaning.  My nose is itchy from all the dust in our filthy filthy house.  I hate hate vacuuming.
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0959.jpg)
I stopped when I got to the main thing I had to clean because it was just too depressing.  Most of that stuff is my boyfriend's anyway, he just conviniently left to do something else when we were going to clean it.  Meanie.


Edit: Obsessions keep the hair.  It's totally hot.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 26 Nov 2007, 17:35
Shit, even I've never slept on a lady and I'm the prettiest fucker on this page without lady-bits that's not named Sam.

Edit: Ahhhh, tits and balls. It's no longer the "this page" I was referring to. God damn it, ebony_willow. I reserve the right to rescind my prior statement as Sam is not presently on this page and, for all I know, some of the dudes on here that are prettier than me may post on this page.

And for the sake of starting the page with a picture, Nabisco has deemed fit to redesign their Oreo packaging with an "Easy Open Pull Tab." I will now review this new packaging in picture format. Multiple pictures ensue, but it's a fucking story, so deal.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PB260003.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PB260006.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PB260001.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PB260007_01.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PB260004.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PB260008-1.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PB260005.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: BobJoeJim on 26 Nov 2007, 17:40
... he says on a new page.  Good show, sir!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 26 Nov 2007, 18:06
Well, at least you've slept on a lady. That is more than some of us

Yeah, uh, we totally staged that shot.

Also if you're going to post Oreos you have to share. I can't get those here, punk.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 26 Nov 2007, 18:31
Yeah, keep the hair, 0b.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: sandysmilinstrange on 26 Nov 2007, 21:05
An Actual Real Live Boy and I at a fancy fountain.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v37/ceeingred/100_0432.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 26 Nov 2007, 21:08
No fair, Real Live Boy.

0b, shave the head.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 26 Nov 2007, 21:17
Hells of cute photo, sandysmilinstrange.

No way dude, keep the hair.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 26 Nov 2007, 21:31
For all I know, some of the dudes on here that are prettier than me may post on this page.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v209/Seanbateman/n1380840033_30111934_2945.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Monkey King on 26 Nov 2007, 21:49
http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k117/Monkey-King/Me/100_2487.jpg (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k117/Monkey-King/Me/100_2487.jpg)

also I use my superpowers to fight evil.....

http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k117/Monkey-King/Me/100_2499.jpg (http://i86.photobucket.com/albums/k117/Monkey-King/Me/100_2499.jpg)

I thought the pics were a little large so didnt throw them in full size....that just seems rude.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 26 Nov 2007, 22:09
Just uh, resize them?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Monkey King on 26 Nov 2007, 22:17
Nah, too much effort, it seems like I would be trying too hard, especially for the low number of posts I had, and this way people can look if they feel like it.....or not, no skin off my nose
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: KickThatBathProf on 27 Nov 2007, 00:40
Random Rondellhund!!!!!!!

(http://www.cafekaka.se/bilder/Rondellhund.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 27 Nov 2007, 01:24
New theme: cardboard cutouts. Bonus points if you've got a Han Solo one.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 27 Nov 2007, 02:57
Extra bonus points if you have, you know, yourself in the picture, given that that's meant to be the whole point of the picture thread.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 27 Nov 2007, 03:13
100 points if it is a cardboard cutout of yourself.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: est on 27 Nov 2007, 05:22
200 if you're making out with it
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 27 Nov 2007, 07:12
300 if it's at ComicCon.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Unosuke on 27 Nov 2007, 07:47
I saw gwar last night
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v361/Unosuke/zombie.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v361/Unosuke/zombie2.jpg)

I think I'm getting too old for some of this shit
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: stella on 27 Nov 2007, 08:02
I actually used to have a cardboard cutout of myself...It was only a foot tall though. 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 27 Nov 2007, 08:23
That's not worth any points without photographic evidence. Sorry, try again later!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 27 Nov 2007, 09:02
Hanging out with friends from boyscout camp means hanging out with one of the gayest dudes I know. Incongruous? Maybe. Hell of fun? Yes.
(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v161/71/107/5729070/n5729070_36768552_9524.jpg)


PEE ESS AM I A MORON OR IS THE DINOSAUR SMILEY NEW??  :-D  :-D  :-D
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 27 Nov 2007, 09:13
refer to YAY BLOWJOBS FOR EVERYONE for the lowdown on the new smiley
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 27 Nov 2007, 09:19
Okay maybe the dinosaur smiley is not working in my thing, for some reason, because I am just seeing more and more of  this fucker. :-D
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 27 Nov 2007, 09:19
Well shit, this is what I get for skimming the forums lately!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 27 Nov 2007, 10:10
Holy fucking shit, this dinosaur smiley is AWESOME. I would like to replace my 5 stars with 5 dinosaurs plz.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 27 Nov 2007, 11:19
Everbody, I want you to try an experiment. Go take a look at that last page.

Notice all the pictures of Jon? Doesn't everybody else on the page look much less attractive?

Okay, now block Jon's images and refresh the page.

Notice any difference? I did. Everybody suddenly got much more attractive. Just pointing that out.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ummmkay on 27 Nov 2007, 13:02
I still like it better shaved, although upon reflection that is probably because of that picture of you ready for the zombie apocalypse. That is an awesome picture.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 27 Nov 2007, 13:11
I wish I were as pretty as Sam and Jon.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 27 Nov 2007, 13:32
I still like it better shaved

I thought this forum was supposed to be SFW.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 27 Nov 2007, 13:51
Hanging out with friends from boyscout camp means hanging out with one of the gayest dudes I know. Incongruous? Maybe. Hell of fun? Yes.

How is that incongruous? No two things are more congruous in my mind.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 27 Nov 2007, 14:22
Guys, my new job is AWESOME!

(http://img255.imageshack.us/img255/3475/photo76tf3.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 27 Nov 2007, 15:22
If that is a game store prepare to be hit on constantly.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 27 Nov 2007, 15:40
She's used to it, dude, this is a QC photo thread.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Dissy on 27 Nov 2007, 15:53
She's used to it, dude, this is a QC photo thread.

I bet she gets it in real life too.  She is all kinds of gorgeous.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 27 Nov 2007, 15:57
*facepalm*
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 27 Nov 2007, 16:02
      *Stunned silence!*
     /
:-D
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 27 Nov 2007, 16:47
Jamie, that is an awesome job! Access to videogames and constant self-esteem boosters all day long! (and a paycheck)

boyscout camp   gay dudes

How is that incongruous? No two things are more congruous in my mind.

It is incongruous because the boyscouts are a very christian-run organization and very anti-gay. It seems odd to me that someone would choose to work for an institution that is so openly and vocally intolerant of their lifestyle.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 27 Nov 2007, 16:50
I for one think they should only employ regular men who enjoy camping with young boys.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 27 Nov 2007, 17:08
There are GAME stores in Australia too?  :|
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 27 Nov 2007, 18:23
Only recently.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 27 Nov 2007, 18:32
White chocolate sucks so bad
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v352/redglasscurls/Narcissism/fuckmacademias.jpg?t=1196216958)

(PS gay =/= pedophilia. Most of the guys working at boyscout camps are nerdy kids who really really loved going to camp when they were younger)

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 27 Nov 2007, 18:38
All of the dudes I know who were in boy scouts basically made it sound like the gayest experience of their lives.

Also, I have kissed all of those dudes.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 27 Nov 2007, 18:43
Well of course gay =/= paedophilia! You fail at picking up jokes in a written format.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: morca007 on 27 Nov 2007, 18:46
HELLO I AM POSTING THIS IMAGE BECAUSE I LIKE IT, I DO HOWEVER LOOK LIKE A DOUCHE IN IT, BUT I HOPE TO AVOID THAT BY TYPING IN ALL CAPS AND HOPING YOU DON'T NOTICE. OH SHI--
(I am the one in front. The thought in my mind at that moment was: "mmmmm, dicks.")

(http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/4666/66103011el9.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: David_Dovey on 27 Nov 2007, 18:49
new job woo!

Damnit you made me think of The Game.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 27 Nov 2007, 19:07
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0965.jpg)
Today I finished my Christmas shopping.  Victory!  Now I can stop spending my money on other people and go back to being selfish.
I also just realised this photo is almost identicle to the last one I posted.  How bizarre.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 27 Nov 2007, 19:19
Jamie, your job is awesome because you get a Guitar Hero III t-shirt. (And the money, etc.)

ebony, you're not looking up! So it's not completely identical!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 27 Nov 2007, 19:21
^ I was totally going to congratulate you on that!

Way to look at the camera! You look mischievous and pleased!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 27 Nov 2007, 19:23
Hahah thanks for noticing.  I tried and everything!  I still have the head tilt though.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 27 Nov 2007, 20:41
Aww darn. What is an arm-length Myspace shot without the head tilt and the slight look to the side?
(For everyone's information I have a flip-out LCD display and that is what I am looking at in most of my photos.)

TODAY IS A DAY FOR HURRCUTZ
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2277/2070698936_82219eeac6.jpg)
ALSO A DAY FOR BEING RED AND SWEATY AFTER WORK
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 27 Nov 2007, 20:52
oo bangs-riffic :-D

I too got a haircut today, it's the first good cut I've gotten since I moved to Chicago :-D

(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y120/jhocking/cropz.png)

EDIT: ack I've started a new page before anyone got to see lunchy's new hairs!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: lprkn on 27 Nov 2007, 21:14
Another post-Gwar photo:


(http://i5.photobucket.com/albums/y181/lprkn/005.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: dennis on 27 Nov 2007, 21:48
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2246/2070829560_3cfeabe160.jpg)

My haircut. Let me show you it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 27 Nov 2007, 22:39
There appears to be a wire protruding from your ear.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 27 Nov 2007, 22:48
It is okay Joe this means I get to post two pictures in rapid succession!
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2415/2070129649_49e813ef77.jpg)
I had to take another set of pictures because in the first one I was all red and sweaty from work.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 27 Nov 2007, 22:50
There appears to be a wire protruding from your ear.
He's charging his batteries. 

Lunchy, your hair looks loads of wonderful! 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ZJGent on 27 Nov 2007, 23:30
Magic Stripping Sequence (SFW)!!

(http://img528.imageshack.us/img528/4894/dscf0007fv9.jpg)

Name's Jack Daniel, creep.

http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/3199/dscf0009sf5.jpg (http://img525.imageshack.us/img525/3199/dscf0009sf5.jpg)

Do you feel lucky, punk? Well, do ya?
The rest of the stripping sequence is available from your nearest Badass Striptease (tm) retailer.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 28 Nov 2007, 00:46
I cut my hairs too! And dyed them.


(http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q228/andlemonade/P5210084edit.jpg)

(you can see the color a bit better here.) (http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q228/andlemonade/P5210084edit.jpg)


The pictures make it look purply, but really its pretty red. I like it a bunches.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 28 Nov 2007, 00:46
Lunchy your hair is hella adorable.  You now have a sexy sleek movie star look.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: KickThatBathProf on 28 Nov 2007, 01:35
i have a question for all you handsome and fashionable people

would i look better with long or short hair?

(http://photos-272.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sf2p/v105/174/68/59506272/n59506272_33449859_167.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 28 Nov 2007, 01:38
Why are you wearing a t-shirt over a perfectly snazzy looking shirt? From what I can see it looks nice, and you go and cover it up with an INCUBUS shirt? Odd.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: KickThatBathProf on 28 Nov 2007, 02:20
yeah, it's kind of a guilty pleasure.  It's one of the first bands I ever got into and they kind of stuck with me, even though i don't think they're newer stuff is that good.

oh, and that whole shirt over other shirt thing
stopped doin that a while ago
this was just the only decent picture i have
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 28 Nov 2007, 03:38
Emaline, that hair style really suits you. You look great!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 28 Nov 2007, 03:38
If that is a game store prepare to be hit on constantly.

It is indeed a game store and surprisingly, after two days of working there, I haven't been hit on yet. I just kind of get the shocked looks as if to say "wow, a girl". I am still yet to have a guy walk into the store and actually need any of my assistance, so I haven't been able to show anybody that I actually know what i am talking about.

Jamie, that is an awesome job! Access to videogames and constant self-esteem boosters all day long! (and a paycheck)

It is the best job I have had! I absolutely love it and I really really really really hope they need the extra staff after Christmas. I don't want to leave. It makes me sad just thinking that I my contract of employment says it concludes on the 15th January.

Jamie, your job is awesome because you get a Guitar Hero III t-shirt. (And the money, etc.)

Our shirts change! I am not sure what our shirts are going to be for Christmas yet.

Also, a picture! Look what I got yesterday, two days before the Australian release:

(http://img263.imageshack.us/img263/6610/photo79ql5.jpg)

(Oh, and there have been GAME stores in Australia for a while now, but a fair few of them used to be gameswizards stores.)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 28 Nov 2007, 06:25
Jamie, do you get to keep those rad shirts?

I clean up rather nicely, don't I?

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/leadhindenburg/IMG_2474.jpg)

And with the removal of the shirt and pants, I am ready to go to bed. AW HELL YEAH, CHICKEN LEGS

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/leadhindenburg/IMG_2478.jpg)

You'd better appreciate that second one, 'cause this concrete house is FUCKING FREEZING this time of year.

EDIT for tags
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 28 Nov 2007, 07:24
My brother asked to borrow my suitcoat for a formal at his girlfriend's college this weekend. I paid $30 for it at Kohl's and have never actually worn it, so I felt the urge to take pictures of it.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PB270017.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/Me/PB270022.jpg)

I have no idea why the Hell I own a tie. I've never worked a job that required them, I just occasionally like ties.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 28 Nov 2007, 07:31
Lookin' sharp but are you familiar with the concept of over-saturation?

Let a couple of pages go once in a while.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 28 Nov 2007, 07:38
You know, I'd actually considered the idea and asked Gabbly's opinion. The only responses I got said "post it." I blame Eugene.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 28 Nov 2007, 07:40
Sometimes the Pocket Jury is right, sometimes it is wrong.

On this occasion, it was wrong.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mooface on 28 Nov 2007, 08:15
stfu, tommy.  there can never be too many photos of jon in the picture thread.


Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 28 Nov 2007, 08:32
Hey Guys, remember Heretic?

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 28 Nov 2007, 08:34
Yeah man Nile made a shitty album about casting that dude down.

I think that might be why he left :(
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 28 Nov 2007, 08:35
Heretic was in gabbly earlier, and we started talking about the olden days where he was the sexiest mother fucker on the planet, then he disappeared. Didn't he win a forum contest that declared him the best looking dude in the world? In the sandbox?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 28 Nov 2007, 08:47
My point was that he posted a lot of pictures, more than anything else.

Gabbly is broken for me.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 28 Nov 2007, 09:46
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v631/kauhornz/Photo37.jpg)

I am in this picture.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: muteKi on 28 Nov 2007, 10:14
Me showing off my beard

Also my hair is apparently inspired from some of my forays into DeviantArt to be possessed by Final Fantasy
Secretly it is another sentient being entirely you see

(http://img411.imageshack.us/img411/3257/hairnf0.th.jpg) (http://img411.imageshack.us/my.php?image=hairnf0.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 28 Nov 2007, 11:30
Pretty lady with an awesome game

Holy crap, does that say $99.99?! How do you live with yourself selling games at those prices? (And, yes, I know that's AUD. That's still a shitload of moneys.)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 28 Nov 2007, 11:51
This is my favorite picture from last Friday. It was a little windy.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v249/dramajuana/Wedding/bestever.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pen on 28 Nov 2007, 12:12
You look lovely, and the woman to your right made me giggle lots! 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 28 Nov 2007, 12:21
Haha, thank you. I'm all "NURR."

Yeah... that's my husband's Aunt Pattie. She's awesome.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: a pack of wolves on 28 Nov 2007, 13:43
That is easily the best wedding photograph I have ever seen, everybody looks really happy. And that guy in the back at the right with the really white hair looks like exactly the man you want to show up unannounced at your party and tell excellent if somewhat saucy anecdotes all night.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 28 Nov 2007, 13:43
the Pocket Jury
excellent, I have never heard this expression before.

*inserts it in brain right between "peanut gallery" and "lunatic fringe"*
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 28 Nov 2007, 13:53
Holy crap, does that say $99.99?! How do you live with yourself selling games at those prices?

Games are ludicrously expensive when the first come out here, then the price crashes to earth very quickly. It's bizarre and it makes no sense to me, but there you have it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 28 Nov 2007, 14:18
That is easily the best wedding photograph I have ever seen, everybody looks really happy.

It's PLEADING to have "BLAGH IM DED" shopped right under the groom's aunt though. Somebody needs to make my day and do it.

Edit: Fucking radical
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 28 Nov 2007, 14:29
Your wish, as they say, is my command.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v249/dramajuana/Wedding/blagh.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: TrekkieTechie on 28 Nov 2007, 14:41
(http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v158/9/40/3303917/n3303917_36381301_9654.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Chrasstor on 28 Nov 2007, 18:13
I like the new haircut Lunchie(ally?), you're a very pretty girl, also, Princy(can't recall real name) looks really cute as always, Emaline looks cute with the new hair also.

In a completely heterosexual way: Obsessions, you look stylish in a cool preppy kinda way. The dress shoes and stuff suit you, plus it's somewhat unique for a 20somethinger now-a-days.

KimJonSuck(I know I knew your name, but memory is failing me): You look cool in a kind of indie/emo kid way. We need pictures of you in small tees+drain-pipes :P

KickThat, the tee over dress-shirt combo looks cool to me! Even though Incubus is not the coolest band, it's really hard to find indie-band tees... Basically, it looks trendy/scene. Nice shot :)!

Everybody else loosk surprisingly good for forumites, but the above just stood out most for me.

SHAMEFUL BLOGGING: At the gym today I weighed in at 150lbs and 5'9.5"! I thought I was a lot shorter/skinnier! I'm kind of glad. Also, I need to buy some more hipster clothing. How do Threadless Tees fit? Also, what do you guys think about drain-pipes(skinny jeans)/converse?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Drill King on 28 Nov 2007, 18:31
Mwah, why try to dress trendy and hipster? Just wear what you like!

But for the record, I only wear con's (size 4 1/2 baby)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Chrasstor on 28 Nov 2007, 18:42
Wow, your feet are small.

Also, I think that a lot of people actually like trendy clothing because they feel like they look like how they want to look(if that makes sense?). It's more a thing about confidence than anything. If you feel you look good, it's a lot easier to be yourself.

I have no snappy right now. Sorry. My hair is pretty darn long now though.

I'm pretty sure I look better with long hair than with short. : |
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Kalessin on 28 Nov 2007, 20:37
Less yap, more snap-brim cap!
(http://world.peace.net/~joelll/xkcd/definitely.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Dissy on 28 Nov 2007, 20:47
I hope this linkage works.


(http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/2073152340/)

 Just to be safe :-D  http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/2073152340/ (http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/2073152340/)

Yeah, I hate uploading stuff to the internets.

That's the most recent picture of me, and its still a year and a half old.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 28 Nov 2007, 21:48
Hey QC, show us what you're reading
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v352/redglasscurls/Narcissism/readsomething.jpg)
Here's your chance to photowhore and show off your intellect at the same time.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 29 Nov 2007, 00:07
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/me/freak.jpg)
I am re-reading one of my birthday presents. It's really quite interesting!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: E. Spaceman on 29 Nov 2007, 00:10
OK!


(http://i133.photobucket.com/albums/q78/ESpaceman/camus.jpg)

I've read this book three times in the last couple weeks. I keep meaning to take a new one to work but i always forget.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 29 Nov 2007, 00:48
(http://www.pretentiousgamer.com/photos/imustnotfear.JPG)

Continuing my quest to read all the classic science fiction I've missed...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 29 Nov 2007, 01:45
I'm reading two books currently. Both I've read before, but whatevs.

It's Too Late To Say I'm Sorry By Joey Comeau
(http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q228/andlemonade/P5220115.jpg)
I'm looking at all the things that fell out of it, when I opened it like that. A note to my mom, two drawings of octopuses, a drawing of a piano, a short story I wrote, a note to this kid I am kinda seeing. I don't remember putting any of those in there. There are three papers sticking out of the top. One is a page marker, the other two say "Make Jake/Janan read this!!"

Zombie Survival Guide
(http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q228/andlemonade/P5220123.jpg)
(This is the face I make at my boyfriend when he says I am being childish. It is also the face my cousin made when she was a kid, and my  two year old sister makes a lot. It's the bad kid face.)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 29 Nov 2007, 04:20
KimJonSuck(I know I knew your name, but memory is failing me): You look cool in a kind of indie/emo kid way. We need pictures of you in small tees+drain-pipes :P

Got one on the last page. I'm too lazy to go take more Myspace-style shots today. Appreciate the compliment though.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ummmkay on 29 Nov 2007, 05:13
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v651/i_so_rule/ymca.jpg)

...M-C-A?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 29 Nov 2007, 06:23
Hey Hannah, snap.

(http://img251.imageshack.us/img251/7986/photo343ga5.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Peet on 29 Nov 2007, 06:35
(http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/4015/dscn2499nl7.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 29 Nov 2007, 06:55
Zombie Survival Guide
(http://i137.photobucket.com/albums/q228/andlemonade/P5220123.jpg)

That's written by Mel Brooks' son. He also wrote World War Z as a follow up.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 29 Nov 2007, 06:58
(pictar)

You are oddly reminiscent of a girl I know back home in California. 'Cept her hair's a lot darker and she dresses a lot like Jenny Lewis.

(dude, Ballard, picture quotes? Come on dude, you know better)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 29 Nov 2007, 07:04
Given that it's a new page, I guess it needs the image for context. Let it slide. He also says something interesting!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 29 Nov 2007, 08:27
Eh, fair enough. Sorry Ballard.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/leadhindenburg/IMG_2486.jpg)

Man, I never realized how skinny I really was until I took this here picture a few minutes ago.

(finally having a camera is so awesome)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Dissy on 29 Nov 2007, 09:51
Do you ever take a picture with the flash?  Or with the lights on?


Anyways, this is what I'm reading:

http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/2074276312/ (http://www.flickr.com/photos/[email protected]/2074276312/)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 29 Nov 2007, 11:38
Mirror, dude.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Gemmwah on 29 Nov 2007, 11:49
[img]http://img136.imageshack.us/img136/4015/dscn2499nl7.jpg[img]

Are you at Portsmouth uni?

That dorm looks scarily familiar.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: celticgeek on 29 Nov 2007, 11:58
I amassed a stack of reading material the last few months before my cataract surgery.  And I am now reading through the stack.

Currently:

(http://g.virbcdn.com/cdnImages/noResize/Image-47710-1005468-reading_001.jpg)


Lisa Randall for the win!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 29 Nov 2007, 12:12
Among other things, this is indeed what I am reading right now.

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2262/2073726761_82a9a16a4c.jpg?v=0)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 29 Nov 2007, 12:38
Finals are coming up, so I have no time to read books I want to read.  Instead, I have my face constantly buried in this:

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b131/sutekitatakai/IMG_3437.jpg)

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 29 Nov 2007, 12:56
IiG, my love, you should get a different biology book. I had to have that same one all last year and while it was mediocre at best, I dug through some of my old high school textbooks and got better explanations and definitions and stuff. Amazon time!



Also, Darryl, most despisd villian, you are looking adorably shaggy. Stop that.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 29 Nov 2007, 13:03
Emaline. A poor mans Kari?


Maybe! :-D
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Emaline on 29 Nov 2007, 13:12
I'm gonna take that as a compliment. Kari seems to be a pretty awesome girl.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 29 Nov 2007, 13:16
Katie - that is my high-school biology book.  We just happened to be using the same book from my 12th grade AP Bio.  The descriptions are mediocre, I agree, but I already know all this stuff so I'm not really that concerned.  But because I am an obsessive student, I'm going to study my ass off anyway.  Plus, the semester is almost over, and I have no money.   

Emaline - you are absolutely precious. 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Verergoca on 29 Nov 2007, 13:19
Wait, isnt that a the good old Campbell? Or, mr. Backbreaker as it has been affectionally called   :-D
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mberan42 on 29 Nov 2007, 13:54
Among other things, this is indeed what I am reading right now.
<House of Leaves>

Man, Liz, you just went up like 10 points in my book. Seriously, you just keep getting cooler and cooler.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 29 Nov 2007, 14:15
Also, Darryl, most despisd villian, you are looking adorably shaggy. Take me.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 29 Nov 2007, 14:45
Oh, Darryl, you Brits get funnier every day <3
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 29 Nov 2007, 14:55
Also, Darryl, you fiendish wastrel, you have misquoted me. Eatshitanddie. <3
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 29 Nov 2007, 15:43
I have selective hearing, I only hear what I want to hear.
And sure, I'll get the oil, but you have to supply the scented candles.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 29 Nov 2007, 16:45
Man, Liz, you just went up like 10 points in my book. Seriously, you just keep getting cooler and cooler.
Dude, sweet. What else have I done to gain points?

Since we have not had a photo in a while, here I am with my sister. We are often mistaken for twins, which I do not understand.

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2277/2074993136_6b28053504.jpg?v=0)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ally on 29 Nov 2007, 16:46
celticgeek: my friend's dad dated Lisa Randall for a while

I is grammar: I use the same biology textbook but sixth edition!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 29 Nov 2007, 19:04
I'm afraid with all the work I've had to do lately, my book is a little boring:

(http://i19.photobucket.com/albums/b198/andthentherewaslindsey/0046.jpg)

Well, boring to you, anyways.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 29 Nov 2007, 19:07
That is one of the most specific topics I have ever seen.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 29 Nov 2007, 20:10
Hannah and CelticGeek, I've read your books and loved them! My totally unnecessary approval is granted!

Linds, you have no idea how much I want to read that book now. What on earth kind of work do you do which requires that??
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 29 Nov 2007, 21:01
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/l_1f848e24c55743d0e8c838538671fa6e.jpg)

(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/l_7e65ec9d1920ae9f1be839a53f018ced.jpg)

We stayed after school again. I raped a trash can and was scaring people by jumping out of lockers. It was great fun.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 29 Nov 2007, 21:22
Our lockers could barely hold a cat, let alone a person.

Lucky.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: celticgeek on 29 Nov 2007, 21:41
celticgeek: my friend's dad dated Lisa Randall for a while

I have pointed out Lisa Randall as a "hot lady physicist" in the past, on these forums.

Does your friend's dad agree?

redglasscurls:  I accept your totally unnecessary approval.  It is a fun book.  And approval is always good.

Happy reading, all.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 29 Nov 2007, 22:00
oh hey look linds is cute.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 29 Nov 2007, 22:02
want to go dancing sometime?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 29 Nov 2007, 22:03
Our lockers could barely hold a cat, let alone a person.

Lucky.

We have to share, so they have to be a bit bigger. The freshman fit quite nicely into the lockers too. Almost like they were made to hold them.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 29 Nov 2007, 22:34
I figured new page + needed context + interesting tidbit + not very large image would be alright. My apologies if it wasn't.

Old-ish picture of me reading a book by a locker. Two categories at once, bitches. If my memory serves me right, it was a sex trivia book that the girl to my right told me to read.

(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v56/157/52/1351921012/n1351921012_30092331_9932.jpg)

Also better photo of my face but worse book photo.

(http://photos-c.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v56/157/52/1351921012/n1351921012_30092330_9664.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: humanoftheyear on 29 Nov 2007, 22:53
(http://i16.tinypic.com/82l0uja.jpg)

i'm going to be so glad to be done with james joyce at the end of the semester.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 29 Nov 2007, 23:00
I was glad to be done with James Joyce this semester also, and I only had to read Portrait.  I got an A in the course though, winner!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 29 Nov 2007, 23:13
We have to share
My immediate reaction: "You have to share lockers?" Why am I more outraged about the thought of a school forcing students to share lockers than living in a shared room?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: thegreatbuddha on 30 Nov 2007, 01:12
pic with obscure book

Wow. Except for your hair color, you look like my sister.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 30 Nov 2007, 02:57
Hey QC, you totally know all these people.

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2409/2075799176_26093ac808.jpg)
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2203/2075010759_d2be3ece8f.jpg)

By posting the two I have a higher chance of having a bad shot of everyone, right?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: KickThatBathProf on 30 Nov 2007, 03:03
J'adore le T-shirt, Lunchbox!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 30 Nov 2007, 03:05
I suspect the camera has been put on a timer to take those photos.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 30 Nov 2007, 03:14
Why however did you guess
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: humanoftheyear on 30 Nov 2007, 03:14
I was glad to be done with James Joyce this semester also, and I only had to read Portrait.

i actually kind of enjoyed portrait. i'm glad we read it and didn't just jump straight into ulysses. portrait is like the astroglide to a nice big ulysses buttfuck.


kudos on the A!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 30 Nov 2007, 03:16
Why however did you guess

The alternative is a bunch of internet geeks approached a stranger.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 30 Nov 2007, 03:19
You think I would let a stranger get his filthy mitts on my lovely camera?
I trusted that stair. That stair was not going anywhere.


SUPER BONUS HOTTIE SHOT
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2364/2075800596_ad060dd3f8_m.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: IronOxide on 30 Nov 2007, 03:39
The first of those two pictures makes me think y'all should be starring in a sitcom.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 30 Nov 2007, 06:36
Why am I more outraged about the thought of a school forcing students to share lockers than living in a shared room?

Because it's different to live with somebody than to share a locker with somebody. When you live with somebody, you can manage to build up trust through person-to-person communication. With a locker, it's a hell of a lot harder, because you only ever see the person if you're already friends/you actually make an effort, so you wind up only being able to communicate via notes and other shit.

      I over-explain things to gain a sense of self-worth.
    /
 :-D
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 30 Nov 2007, 08:58
Linds, you have no idea how much I want to read that book now. What on earth kind of work do you do which requires that??

I'm taking an art history course about 17th century paintings from the Netherlands. We got to chose the topic of our final paper, and I chose marriage portraits! I am kind of glad someone else thinks the topic doesn't sound boring, because I actually kind of like reading about it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Peet on 30 Nov 2007, 09:26
Are you at Portsmouth uni?

(http://www.rtpi.org.uk/download/1711/cardiff-uni.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 30 Nov 2007, 10:05
What the hell language IS that, Pete?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Peet on 30 Nov 2007, 10:19
(http://www.mod.uk/NR/rdonlyres/F072CE9B-02DF-4884-BA24-10E8D5DDE9C9/0/Wales.bmp)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 30 Nov 2007, 10:31
HOLY SHIT GUYS THE GROUP FINALLY HAS A GUY WHO CAN SPEAK DRACONIAN, HELL YEAH NOW MAYBE OUR DM WILL LET US GET COOL LOOT
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Scandanavian War Machine on 30 Nov 2007, 12:59
since i don't know what you are talking about, here's an extremely long picture.
notice the gymnastics equipment in the background. my job is awesome.

(http://a116.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/27/l_68218d5cfcac900a49ff68d1d946122b.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tom on 30 Nov 2007, 13:25
Is your avatar made from something you did at work then?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Scandanavian War Machine on 30 Nov 2007, 13:29
yeah, during my "lunch break."
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tom on 30 Nov 2007, 14:10
I like how your photo is made from multiple images  :-D
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 30 Nov 2007, 14:36
This is who I spent a good portion of yesterday with. Good times.

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/jimmy5times/DSCF0345.jpg)

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/jimmy5times/DSCF0352.jpg)

There are other pictures, but I have yet to resize them and such.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lummer on 30 Nov 2007, 15:17
Guys. I bought this beer to try it out, and it is NOT GOOD!
It's crappy, actually.
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/Mosag/Foto131.jpg)

I should have stuck with this:

(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/Mosag/Foto127.jpg)

or this:

(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y107/Mosag/Foto128.jpg)

Yes, I really like import beer. I am not a connoiseur yet, but I'm workin' on it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Verergoca on 30 Nov 2007, 15:33
To: All Ozzies

Plz stop having so much fun with me on the other side of the world. Plz come here!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 30 Nov 2007, 15:54
I'll sign that petition, man.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 30 Nov 2007, 16:09
[$4.00 Lunchbox]

I'll pay 10. Plus a camaro. (Camaro may require new transmission, which will be provided)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 30 Nov 2007, 17:11
Sold. She's yours. Where do I get my goddamn car?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 30 Nov 2007, 18:39
'Sup?

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/jimmy5times/DSCF0347.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 30 Nov 2007, 18:48
Dear Sam,

Please turn 18 soon.

Thank you,
Liz
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 30 Nov 2007, 19:01
We have to share
My immediate reaction: "You have to share lockers?" Why am I more outraged about the thought of a school forcing students to share lockers than living in a shared room?

It's kind of weird, because our school assigns the partners. So you usually don't even know the person. Not very fun.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tyler on 30 Nov 2007, 19:31
(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a373/teresias216/sleepytrash.jpg)

Late to the book party. Thats what I read this week.

(http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a373/teresias216/hipstertrash.jpg)

And thats what not shaving for a week has done to me.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 30 Nov 2007, 19:53
I just popped out for some lunch and on my way to this little Indian restaurant near my flat I came across this little gem sitting in an antique shop. The Indian place was closed but I still managed to pick up something I am much happier with.

(http://i7.photobucket.com/albums/y258/jimmy5times/DSCF0353.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 30 Nov 2007, 20:02
on the bus back from model UN:
i think it's time to shave.


You have one more day! Be strong, Sam!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Chrasstor on 30 Nov 2007, 22:15
Nice pictures guys.  :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D :-D
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 30 Nov 2007, 23:54
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN9072.jpg)

Gabbly + Cookie Dough Ice Cream = Good times
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 01 Dec 2007, 00:00
Not fucking fair.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 01 Dec 2007, 00:13
Goddamn, that guy in the middle back could be Jack Thompson's twin.
*goes off to GIS Jack Thompson*
I like how one of the first ones is a PA strip. *love* Anyway, yeah. A little close. Except the guy in my picture (Joel) is a video game developer, not a stupid lawyer. You know that game... The Godfather? Yeah. He worked on that one.

Oh, and here are some more wedding pictures.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v249/dramajuana/Wedding/veilpeekcrop.jpg)
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v249/dramajuana/Wedding/daddydance.jpg)

I love my daddy. I'm just a geek making weird faces. Cuz I can.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 01 Dec 2007, 00:21
Are you sure you're a geek? Because the Geek Show at carnivals is usually a hobo who bites the heads off of live animals.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Caiphana on 01 Dec 2007, 00:25
I used to eat live ants for money when I was in school...
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: dennis on 01 Dec 2007, 02:43
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2290/2077893716_34f0f0a3d3.jpg)

I IZ AN URBANITE.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 01 Dec 2007, 03:12
Man what is it about those ever-present tallish buildings with that kindof staggered-rounded top? They're fuckin' everywhere, man. Atlanta, San Francisco, New York City... shit even Fresno has them now.

DEAR CALIFORNIAN FORUMITES: If you want to hang out from 12 Dec. to 27 Dec., I am available in the Bay Area if it's accessible by BART.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: dennis on 01 Dec 2007, 03:25
I donno much about architecture, but I think it's an Art-Deco style.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: fatty on 01 Dec 2007, 03:51
Art Deco. (http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/3b/Chrysler_building-_top.jpg/534px-Chrysler_building-_top.jpg)
In respect to the staggered tops: Building and zoning codes in many cities in USA require set backs and staggered tops to reduce the shadowing of streets.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 01 Dec 2007, 04:55
*goes off to GIS Jack Thompson*
I like how one of the first ones is a PA strip. *love* Anyway, yeah. A little close. Except the guy in my picture (Joel) is a video game developer, not a stupid lawyer. You know that game... The Godfather? Yeah. He worked on that one.
wow they are eerily similar looking opposites then. It's like Magneto vs Professor X. Spiderman vs Carnage. Ann Coulter vs women.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Sir Tacopuss on 01 Dec 2007, 05:40
http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a373/teresias216/sleepytrash.jpg (http://i15.photobucket.com/albums/a373/teresias216/sleepytrash.jpg)

Late to the book party. Thats what I read this week.


I spy with my little eye that you've been reading Layer Cake, right?


(http://img50.imageshack.us/img50/4152/56878865xl5.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 01 Dec 2007, 05:53
Get rid of that neck beard and let the sex happen. Unless you're in a relationship or what.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 01 Dec 2007, 05:56
Idunno man, I think this is one of those rare instances of acceptable neckbeard.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Chrasstor on 01 Dec 2007, 06:44
I'm gonna have to agree, chop the neckfur sire.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: dennis on 01 Dec 2007, 09:17
i kind of admire anyone who shaves the beard on his face, but not his neck.

my friend calls it the "bib".
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 01 Dec 2007, 10:34
Idunno man, I think this is one of those rare instances of acceptable neckbeard.

It's not bad, but it'd be better if it wasn't there.

So I fixed my computer.

(http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/4571/1001115tu6.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 01 Dec 2007, 11:24
I'm in the Bay Area and I'm about 10 minutes from the Dublin Bart station. I dunno if anyone else will be around. Anna, will you be at your sister's house any point during vacation?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: sandysmilinstrange on 01 Dec 2007, 12:14
Scandanavian War Machine, that is an awesome picture. Nicely fitted together.

Tyler is hand-some. The scruff suits you.

Caiphana, I'm pretty sure that the first of the two pictures made me grin because it's effing adorable.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Sir Tacopuss on 01 Dec 2007, 13:20
Idunno man, I think this is one of those rare instances of acceptable neckbeard.

It's not bad, but it'd be better if it wasn't there.

You're just jealous =P

Quote
So I fixed my computer.

http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/4571/1001115tu6.jpg (http://img153.imageshack.us/img153/4571/1001115tu6.jpg)

Did you fix it with a hammer? oO
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 01 Dec 2007, 13:24
That is an interesting definition of "fixed."

Also, you are not in that picture. FAIL
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 01 Dec 2007, 13:54
Well now it's not in a huge tower so now I can fit my chair and feet under the desk. Consider it a bonus that you don't have to look at me!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: CoheedKillgannon on 01 Dec 2007, 15:29
(http://i216.photobucket.com/albums/cc143/inkeepingsecrets9/1130071001.jpg)
getting punched in the face sucks
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 01 Dec 2007, 15:32
You have Coheed in your username, you probably deserved it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: cheesepie on 01 Dec 2007, 15:44
SO NABEGROMO IS OVER!!!
This is my funny beard that I hast shaven.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v319/cheesepie/Picture006.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 01 Dec 2007, 15:51
Well that's something I've never seen before.

You should probably get rid of it before Insane Clown Posse fans start copying you.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 01 Dec 2007, 19:00
Mr. Pie, I believe you have dark brown hairy growths on your face.  Perhaps you should have a doctor check that out, because it might be contagious. 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Drill King on 01 Dec 2007, 20:04
I actually kinda dig it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 01 Dec 2007, 21:16
That is pretty much the best bag I have ever seen.

Also, you appear to be trapped in some kind of video game world.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 02 Dec 2007, 00:42
New theme: trippy overexposed shots.

(http://photos-a.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sf2p/v56/20/92/1351920010/n1351920010_30095304_9520.jpg)

Yes, I'm in this. The leftmost blur.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 02 Dec 2007, 00:55
No, that is not a good theme.

No it is not at all.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jmrz on 02 Dec 2007, 03:05
Somewhat late to the theme, as always, but this is what I am currently reading:

(http://img258.imageshack.us/img258/2383/perksofbeingawallflowerki0.jpg)

('The Perks of Being a Wallflower' in case you cannot see the title clearly enough)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 02 Dec 2007, 03:23
We interrrupt this important thread to bring you breaking news.

I've got a scanner!!!  :-D  :-D  :-D  :-D

And here's a picture of me in 1985/6 to prove it

(http://i29.photobucket.com/albums/c266/Mark761/me-c86.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: godinpants on 02 Dec 2007, 06:10
Somewhat late to the theme, as always, but this is what I am currently reading:

('The Perks of Being a Wallflower' in case you cannot see the title clearly enough)

Within 3 seconds of seeing that photo I went "Oooh... Bioshock."

Is there something wrong with me?

Here's what im reading.
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v11/grommit/Photo16.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 02 Dec 2007, 06:21
If I knew what that meant I'd tell you.

But, yes, there probably is :P
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ladybug on 02 Dec 2007, 08:14
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v26/mariasha/Bilde257.jpg)

Blah. Exams and stuff, so that is what I'm reading now. Photobucket needs a flip image-function, imo. But in case your reading backwards-abilites aren't that great, it's "Introduction to algorithms" by Cormen/Leiserson/Rivest/Stein. Also, I hit my nose on a shelf.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 02 Dec 2007, 08:55
Within 3 seconds of seeing that photo I went "Oooh... Bioshock."

Is there something wrong with me?

Once you get past the beginning (slow as all hell), that game is HOLYSHIT I CAN ZAP BITCHES.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Drill King on 02 Dec 2007, 10:27
Algorithms suck. Also I sure do post in here a whole bunch for never posting pictures.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: bryanthelion on 02 Dec 2007, 12:06
The perks of being a wallflower is a good book
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 02 Dec 2007, 12:29
No it is not.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ampersandwitch on 02 Dec 2007, 12:29
I concur.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tom on 02 Dec 2007, 12:45
Quote
Books

In the novel Charlie's teacher, Bill, assigns him various books to read. Charlie describes them all as his favorites.


    * To Kill a Mockingbird by Harper Lee
    * This Side of Paradise by F. Scott Fitzgerald
    * Peter Pan by J.M. Barrie
    * The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald
    * A Separate Peace by John Knowles
    * The Catcher in the Rye by J. D. Salinger
    * On the Road by Jack Kerouac
    * Naked Lunch by William S. Burroughs
    * Walden by Henry David Thoreau
    * Hamlet by William Shakespeare
    * The Stranger by Albert Camus
    * The Fountainhead by Ayn Rand

The book also references The Mayor of Castro Street by Randy Shilts

that's what i'm going to do with my holidays now.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 02 Dec 2007, 12:52
Algorithms!

I'm using that very same book in my Algorithms class!

Which reminds me I have homework due and a final in two weeks!

Goddammit!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 02 Dec 2007, 12:55
Hahaha I love being out of school.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: StaedlerMars on 02 Dec 2007, 14:56
Algorithms!

I'm using that very same book in my Algorithms class!

Which reminds me I have homework due and a final in two weeks!

Goddammit!

my final for that class (with that exact same book) is two days away. I haven't looked at the book yet. instead, i am posting this. i could be in a spot of trouble.

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 02 Dec 2007, 16:23
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN9107.jpg)

PATRICK! Come get your eggs and salsa. They is done.

(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/l_80a38b24b84b8585165dabb903ced4fc.jpg)

Picture of my horsie :-)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 02 Dec 2007, 17:02
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/monkeybag.jpg)
Check out my pimpin' monkey bag!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: IronOxide on 02 Dec 2007, 17:34
That bag is pimpin' indeed.

Pimpin' indeed.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tom on 02 Dec 2007, 21:36
It is several kinds of awesome.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 02 Dec 2007, 23:13
We interrrupt this important thread to bring you breaking news.

I've got a scanner!!!  :-D  :-D  :-D  :-D

And here's a picture of me in 1985/6 to prove it

This looks like a scene straight out of Risky Business.

Lookin' sharp.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 03 Dec 2007, 03:19
IT ARR WINTER.

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2108/2082961273_c7af6e3d8d.jpg)

I ARR WINTERDSKI.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Katherine on 03 Dec 2007, 06:31
I want your hat so bad, it is all sorts of fantastic.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 03 Dec 2007, 07:30
PATRICK! Come get your eggs and salsa. They is done.

FUCK YES
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Sir Tacopuss on 03 Dec 2007, 11:57
IT ARR WINTER.

http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2108/2082961273_c7af6e3d8d.jpg (http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2108/2082961273_c7af6e3d8d.jpg)

I ARR WINTERDSKI.

Man, you look exactly like Helge Schneider. Awesome.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Joseph on 03 Dec 2007, 19:58
Late to the reading party!

(http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l6/joe-gia/IMG000017.jpg?t=1196740694)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tom on 03 Dec 2007, 23:05
(http://i217.photobucket.com/albums/cc227/f1abberghast/DSC01620.jpg)
Damn camera, the book is The Complete Tales and Poems of Edgar Allan Poe.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 04 Dec 2007, 00:19
(http://www.pretentiousgamer.com/photos/failed.JPG)

Guys, I suck really bad at being Chuck.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tom on 04 Dec 2007, 00:27
am I in any way partially responsible for you not having facial hair, bar the side burns?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 04 Dec 2007, 00:28
Not everything is about you, y'know
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 04 Dec 2007, 00:34
Chuck doesn't have facial hair.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 04 Dec 2007, 00:39
That is such a lovely scarf.  It really brings out the surly in your face.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tom on 04 Dec 2007, 00:41
Sorry, I didn't read the text at the bottom and I'm not sure which Chuck you are referring to.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 04 Dec 2007, 00:47

Guys, I suck really bad at being Chuck.

You have a 70s BBC Classic Serial kind of face.

Especially with the sideburns.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 04 Dec 2007, 00:52
The scarf kind helps with that theme too:

(http://www.pretentiousgamer.com/photos/who.JPG)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 04 Dec 2007, 01:29
Yeah. Basically just any 70s BBC drama production.

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 04 Dec 2007, 04:28
Sam, be nice to the worthless quitter.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 04 Dec 2007, 06:28
Guys, I suck really bad at being Chuck.

Of course you suck at being me. You are not me, son. Tonight I will show you bitches how that shot is done.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: StMonkey on 04 Dec 2007, 06:52
And we will quiver in fear. and lust. and jealousy.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 04 Dec 2007, 07:17
I'm late jumping on the reading bandwagon, but whatever. You can sortof see my haircut and my bumfluff.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/leadhindenburg/IMG_2492.jpg)

Also, look at the street I live on! Isn't it purdy?

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/leadhindenburg/IMG_2491.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 04 Dec 2007, 07:48
I love the hand held in such a manner that suggests, "Behold, the street."
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 04 Dec 2007, 08:26
The hand's just to ward off "UR NOT IN THE PICTAR" yapping. And the potholes shift periodically to keep things interesting. :B
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Misereatur on 04 Dec 2007, 11:14
It's stupidly difficult to find books like this in the original language anywhere near where I live.

Tell me about it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: brady on 04 Dec 2007, 11:58
My transformation from Jesus to not Jesus:


Jesus
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b219/madartin/today003gb5.jpg)


Not Jesus
(http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b219/madartin/geena012.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 04 Dec 2007, 12:09
Why hello there.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: onewheelwizzard on 04 Dec 2007, 12:15
The Filth is fucking awesome.

I wish I had a camera.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 04 Dec 2007, 12:28
My transformation from Jesus to not Jesus:


Jesus
http://i20.photobucket.com/albums/b219/madartin/today003gb5.jpg
My friend, Jesus would NOT have worn a goatee.

Not unless he was...

HIS OWN EVIL TWIN  :-o
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 04 Dec 2007, 15:33
New page needs more content.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/leadhindenburg/IMG_2498.jpg)

Sleepy Patrick is sleeeeepy.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Eris on 04 Dec 2007, 16:01
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v663/Lapuz/me/WebCam_20071205_1048.jpg)
This is Hannah. She has to clean the kitchen. She does not want to, so is fiddling with her webcam.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 04 Dec 2007, 16:04
Good hair.

That expression is just asking to be made into an emoticon.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 04 Dec 2007, 16:40
Hannah, I love your hair all happy and wavy like that!!

My roommate made me these fabulous Dia De Los Muertos earrings for Hannukah!
(http://photos-b.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v155/77/17/5739266/n5739266_36854985_8924.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 04 Dec 2007, 16:45
Thos are a most excellent pair of earrings!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Wayfaring Stranger on 04 Dec 2007, 18:18
I think it's pretty cool to get a gift for one holiday that relates to another holiday.  They're cool-looking too.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 04 Dec 2007, 18:21
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_0991.jpg)

I am also supposed to be cleaning.  But instead, I am here!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: DonInKansas on 04 Dec 2007, 23:15
Me and my nearly 3 year old son digging a hole.  Cuz we're cool like that.  And yes, he is rocking cowboy boots; I swear he'd sleep in them if he could.
(http://a357.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/45/l_6d33155191f69308fe78ff4ed170853c.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: squawk on 04 Dec 2007, 23:35
Those dirt mover things are the best thing ever.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 05 Dec 2007, 01:20
And yes, he is rocking cowboy boots; I swear he'd sleep in them if he could.

I always though things like that were what kids are good at.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Aimless on 05 Dec 2007, 04:09
Am I too late?

The book is Neuroscience 3/e. It causes me much visceral pain:

(http://img84.imageshack.us/img84/7125/visceralpainxu3.jpg)

EDIT: Oh, I am VERY late!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 05 Dec 2007, 07:05
Pictar

I swear if if weren't for the red hairz, you would be an exact replica of one of the ladies at my mother's work.

She's pretty good looking.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: cupcakeonastick on 05 Dec 2007, 09:54
Something to chew on while waiting for Jonathan Coulton

(http://i10.tinypic.com/85eml36.png)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 05 Dec 2007, 10:31
I has new footwearz.

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2287/2088822843_35c927de02.jpg?v=0)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 05 Dec 2007, 10:54
You know, if I asked someone to make me a cake in the shape of a pair of shoes I think i'd want it to look like those (or that, seeing as how you're only holding up one)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 05 Dec 2007, 12:24
Not like these? For shame.
(http://www.angelzfunnyz.com/Portals/0/Gallery/Album/10/cake-shoes.jpg)

PICTURE CAUSE ITS A PICTURE THREAD AND STUFF
My bangs always fucking do this. I have a fringy eyepatch.
(http://photos-991.ll.facebook.com/photos-ll-sctm/v156/159/96/626690991/n626690991_494124_4840.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 05 Dec 2007, 13:20
I has new footwearz.

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2287/2088822843_35c927de02.jpg?v=0)

Are those Puma, or did they just rip off the Formstripe?

Either way I would probably wear them.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Symptom on 05 Dec 2007, 13:32
As close to reading as my week's schedule allows..
(http://img140.imageshack.us/img140/6673/electroyeahtm8.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 05 Dec 2007, 13:39
I has new footwearz.

Are those Puma, or did they just rip off the Formstripe?

Either way I would probably wear them.

logo suggests champions
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 05 Dec 2007, 14:29
They are indeed ripoffs as I cannot afford the real thing. They are also women's shoes, sorry Kieffer.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 05 Dec 2007, 15:25
Haha, this means Kieffer's a cross-dresser.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Peet on 05 Dec 2007, 16:59
(http://img135.imageshack.us/img135/6748/dscn2518rf7.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 05 Dec 2007, 17:03
Wow, did you get in the worst (best?) spitball fight ever, or what?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Peet on 05 Dec 2007, 17:08
(http://www1.istockphoto.com/file_thumbview_approve/663411/2/istockphoto_663411_black_forest_cake.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Katherine on 05 Dec 2007, 17:14
(http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k27/katherinesalisbury/glasses019-1.jpg)

My hair has lightened up a bit since I colored it, I'm pretty happy with it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 05 Dec 2007, 17:17
Gain 84,000 more freckles, and you're an insta-ginger!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 05 Dec 2007, 17:23
pictarz

Do you not use words anymore?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Cartilage Head on 05 Dec 2007, 21:45
 Katherine's smile was the perfect followup to the cake.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 06 Dec 2007, 00:21
peanut butterrrrr

my friend gave me this jar on sunday, i believe.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v321/coolcathay/Photo6.jpg)

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v321/coolcathay/Photo34.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tom on 06 Dec 2007, 00:30
new theme?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Johnny C on 06 Dec 2007, 00:33
The Cathy has grown bored with her peanut butter.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 06 Dec 2007, 00:47
Chunky peanut butter is the work of Satan.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: dennis on 06 Dec 2007, 01:08

there's a hair in your cake.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 06 Dec 2007, 02:16
Chunky peanut butter is the work of Satan.

Hey I like that stuI WILL EAT YOUR INFANTS
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 06 Dec 2007, 03:38
I like penut butter as well.

(http://img502.imageshack.us/img502/4420/pbjm6.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: StMonkey on 06 Dec 2007, 08:36
Then why do you look so glum?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 06 Dec 2007, 09:06
The power of Jif compels him.  The power of Jif compels him.  The power of Jif compels him.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 06 Dec 2007, 12:19
I am so much more excited about my peanut butter than the rest of y'alls.

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2304/2091221505_515138d92b_m.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 06 Dec 2007, 13:45
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/leadhindenburg/IMG_2499.jpg)

I win, Liz.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tom on 06 Dec 2007, 13:53
ur doin it wrong.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 06 Dec 2007, 14:22
Here Jif is a household cleaner.
You probably don't want to eat it.

More pictures!
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2166/2091143872_2ca218ef2a_m.jpg)
I put a skunky patch in my hair. I plan to dye it turquoise. Good/bad idea?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 06 Dec 2007, 14:24
meh
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 06 Dec 2007, 14:24
Leave it the way it is! It r hawt!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 06 Dec 2007, 14:44
My vote goes to 'no'. I had a roomie this summer who did that, and every time I saw him with it (and believe me, he changed it frequently just to make it more noticeable) I wanted to shave his head with an electric razor and then stab him in the throat with it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 06 Dec 2007, 15:31
Here Jif is a household cleaner.
You probably don't want to eat it.


That's interesting, because it also used to be a household cleaner here until some of our lamo European friends decided that Cif (pronounced with a soft c) was easier to say (I guess in most European tongues Jif sounds like "Yiff"... And we don't want to go there)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: negative creep on 06 Dec 2007, 17:35
Why would you read Dostoyevsky for English? Doesn't make much sense to me.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v225/todesfuesch/LenaJohannaDomi.jpg)
I was in Dresden, visiting friends!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ally on 06 Dec 2007, 17:43
We're reading a translation. It is a quality book in any language!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: IronOxide on 06 Dec 2007, 17:49
I did an english paper on Voltaire's Candide once, and we're doing Inferno right now.

It doesn't have quite the quality in prose that it used to, but it's still good.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 06 Dec 2007, 18:20
Look at all the highfalutin readers in these parts.

Well, I read too, guys:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v289/0bsessions/My%20Pictures/PC060012.jpg)

(Also: New shoes. You're all jealous because they are more comfortable than any pair of shoes any of you have ever owned, unless you own the same shoes)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 06 Dec 2007, 21:26
Why would you read Dostoyevsky for English? Doesn't make much sense to me.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v225/todesfuesch/LenaJohannaDomi.jpg)
I was in Dresden, visiting friends!

Pretty european girls! Ooo La La!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 06 Dec 2007, 21:51
Why would you read Dostoyevsky for English? Doesn't make much sense to me.

Because you can translate his works and pretend he's American!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 06 Dec 2007, 22:56
It's what we do best. (Sadly.)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 06 Dec 2007, 23:14
So guys my little sister made me this totally righteous hat for chanukkah.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v209/Seanbateman/Photo48.jpg)

Also I am dropping out of college to become a longshoreman.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: dennis on 07 Dec 2007, 00:50
Here Jif is a household cleaner.
You probably don't want to eat it.

More pictures!
(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2166/2091143872_2ca218ef2a_m.jpg)
I put a skunky patch in my hair. I plan to dye it turquoise. Good/bad idea?
T...Turquoise?

Sure! Do it!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: thegreatbuddha on 07 Dec 2007, 01:00
Man, I have been hopelessly addicted to Jif ever since I went to America when I was eleven. Sadly, chunky peanut butter is impossible to find in Norway, so I have to rely on my dad's business trips. Which kind of sucks.

@ ANyways: Cut peanuts up and put them in creamy JIF. Toast them in an oven (300-325F) for around 8-10 minutes first. When they start to turn darker, take themout of the oven and either shock them in ice water or throw themstraight into the JIF, since the residual hest will probably burn them.

@Lunchbox: dunno bout the turquoise. I think it will hide the color of your eyes, which is a kind of pale crystal blue? They are awesome eyes, and you should do nothing to detract from them
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 07 Dec 2007, 01:08
I think it will hide the color of your eyes, which is a kind of pale crystal blue
"crystal blue" sounds like a designer drug.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 07 Dec 2007, 01:37
Tried it, it's not that great.

Foxy Methoxy is better.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 07 Dec 2007, 01:49
Pretty european girls! Ooo La La!

Either the German exchange students at my college were picked for their attractiveness or they're just superior.




And that's how WWII started!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: negative creep on 07 Dec 2007, 05:01
I can neither comfirm nor deny that. Although some of the girl from my school who participated in an exchange with a school in Norfolk, Virgina weren't all that attractive. But we can still blame that on the teacher's bad taste.

I realized that it is a translation that you're reading, but as i said, it doesn't make much sense to me. It's like reading a translation of Shakespeare in German class.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Jimmy the Squid on 07 Dec 2007, 05:05
Generally speaking, in English speaking countries (the UK, US, Australia, Canada etc...) English may also simply refer to Literature since basic grammar and spelling would be attended to during primary school. Basically what I am saying is that it is not that uncommon to read translated Western texts for English classes.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 07 Dec 2007, 05:24
basic grammar and spelling would be attended to during primary school.

Ha.

HAH!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 07 Dec 2007, 05:30
Either the German exchange students at my college were picked for their attractiveness or they're just superior.

I am pretty sure that's just how most German chicks look. Or maybe the good-lookin' ones are all in downtown Trier and scattered on the road from the Luxembourgish-German border to the gates outside of Bitburg AFB.

I swear going through that gate was like going from a steady whiskey buzz to COMPLETE SOBRIETY.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: negative creep on 07 Dec 2007, 05:48
Jimmy, I didn't know that. Makes more sense now. It's different here.

The girls in Trier are quite okay, as far as i can remember from my time there, but as most of them go to University there, they are not necessarily from Trier or the region. I must say, though, that Trier is a dead place on a tuesday night. I was there this week and there was nothing going on at all. And all the pretty girls were hiding or something.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 07 Dec 2007, 10:15
Here is an image where is is hard to see my hair properly because apparently it is getting a bit thin.

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b117/itsjesuslmao/100_1131.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tania on 07 Dec 2007, 12:13
crime and punishment is an excellent novel! i wish i had read it for english in high school. i think we had the hobbit/lotr trilogy instead.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Drill King on 07 Dec 2007, 12:39
Durr hurr i c ur wet hair drillz, is awsum.
(http://i12.tinypic.com/85o0by1.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 07 Dec 2007, 12:45
don't write like that.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 07 Dec 2007, 13:03
He has trouble masturbating to your picture when he thinks you can't write correctly.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 07 Dec 2007, 14:30
He has trouble masturbating to your picture when he thinks you can't write correctly.

POST OF THE YEAR
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 07 Dec 2007, 14:55
I never got pics that look like your were accidentally in them.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 07 Dec 2007, 15:27
IT'S ART.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Drill King on 07 Dec 2007, 17:07
Funny thing is, actually accidently in it. Was just trying to take a normal picture, but I'm a retard and cannot do it.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 07 Dec 2007, 17:31
He has trouble masturbating to your picture when he thinks you can't write correctly.

On second thought, to keep you from being creeped the fuck out, write like that ALL the time.

I mean srsly, *I* would be creeped out if I knew Kieffer was gettin' his fap on to MY picture.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Drill King on 07 Dec 2007, 17:52
Ahaha, I don't think I'll worry about it too much.

(http://i16.tinypic.com/73my9w3.jpg)

So who else has snow and still goes out in it?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Tom on 07 Dec 2007, 18:28
Lucky, i never get snow.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ForteBass on 07 Dec 2007, 20:54
Guys, I normally don't do this, but...

Before:

(http://a372.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/81/l_f1c0bc9506d510b06b33f2718856d8fb.jpg)

After:

(http://a666.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/79/l_eb95ad151389181cf01aabdb202cc789.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 07 Dec 2007, 20:57
I mean srsly, *I* would be creeped out if I knew Kieffer was gettin' his fap on to MY picture.

Dude I would be honoured.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 07 Dec 2007, 21:40
Would be? I've seen the pictures man.

You're like, #4 in my daily wankfodder.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 08 Dec 2007, 00:36
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/l_9522cf449f182564af0a38471407a0f0.jpg)
Hanging out in the trash cans is what the cool kids do, right?

(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/l_dba8f4529a881ae5f76043079a004e10.jpg)
English class...oh boy! (I'm the one in the back giving kisses)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 08 Dec 2007, 01:25
So who else has snow and still goes out in it?

I will go out in the snow as long as it is not in my car. Snow is great.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 08 Dec 2007, 06:48
Before:
After:

Nice haircut Ben!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: mfpole on 08 Dec 2007, 07:06
Oh god I'm late, but You Shall Know our Velocity! is such a good book.

I'm reading this:
(http://i138.photobucket.com/albums/q249/mfpole/DSCN0930.jpg)

My dog is too.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Sir Tacopuss on 08 Dec 2007, 07:46
Jimmy, I didn't know that. Makes more sense now. It's different here.

The girls in Trier are quite okay, as far as i can remember from my time there, but as most of them go to University there, they are not necessarily from Trier or the region. I must say, though, that Trier is a dead place on a tuesday night. I was there this week and there was nothing going on at all. And all the pretty girls were hiding or something.

They were hiding from YOU, ha!

------------------------------------------------------

Besides... everyone knows that THIS is what german girls look like in reality:

(http://www.rose-dirndl.de/photos/0009.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Leonidas on 08 Dec 2007, 08:17

The girls in Trier are quite okay, as far as i can remember from my time there, but as most of them go to University there, they are not necessarily from Trier or the region. I must say, though, that Trier is a dead place on a tuesday night. I was there this week and there was nothing going on at all. And all the pretty girls were hiding or something.

I'm off to Trier in a few days time to visit a friend whilst I have a few days off before Christmas. Flying into Dusseldorf, then a bus to Cologne, a few hours there and then a train to Trier. It'll be a bit of a long trip but I'm looking forward to it. If it was in the UK I would be having panic attacks right now about even thinking of attempting such a journey via public transport. I have the upmost faith in German efficiency however.....
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: E. Spaceman on 08 Dec 2007, 08:39
Wir fahr'n fahr'n fahr'n auf der Autobahn
Wir fahr'n fahr'n fahr'n auf der Autobahn
Wir fahr'n fahr'n fahr'n auf der Autobahn
Wir fahr'n fahr'n fahr'n auf der Autobahn
Wir fahr'n fahr'n fahr'n auf der Autobahn
Wir fahr'n fahr'n fahr'n auf der Autobahn
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ally on 08 Dec 2007, 10:04
It's what we do best. (Sadly.)

Not at all. We are actually getting a crash course in 19th century Russian history while we read the book, which adds another element.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: schimmy on 08 Dec 2007, 10:06
For reference, this is what three hours of British public transport did to me this morning:
(http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/ee300/n1xxa1/043.jpg)
Have you ever got the first bus in the morning to a place you've never been before, and had to guess where to get off?
Then walk around in the dark looking for the tram station, wondering if you're going to be mugged?*
Then when you find the tram you are the only people on it, and then when you get off the tram, have to walk around for an hour before you can get on the train to finally get you within walking distance of home?
I think I am just about the best friend ever... I only did this because my friend needed to go to work in the morning. Even her boyfriend didn't want to do it.

*Stretford is not a nice place to be at any time. Ever.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: negative creep on 08 Dec 2007, 12:01
Its nice to see you posting again, Leonidas! I think it's safe to say that German public transport is pretty good. Make sure to post pictures and stories from your trip!

Also, contrary to popular belief, most people here don't look like Sir Tacopuss in that picture.

Old picture!!
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v225/todesfuesch/sutterdommi.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 08 Dec 2007, 12:41
Before:
After:

Nice haircut Ben!

(http://www.forumspile.com/Blank-Facepalm.gif)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 08 Dec 2007, 14:55
I'm off to Trier in a few days

Oh I hate you, I want to go to the Weinachtsmarkt :(

Sir Tacopuss: that kindof looks like a dude, but it's a dude with a pretty excellent rack. This confuses my brain. Fuck that, I'm going to check out what's on The Hun.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Joseph on 08 Dec 2007, 22:20
Inspired by the dinosaur thread, and making use of a crappy webcam:

(http://i92.photobucket.com/albums/l6/joe-gia/IMG000025.jpg?t=1197181197)

AHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jodizzle on 08 Dec 2007, 23:16
I had my 21st birthday party last night! It was a fun time!  I made everyone wear costumes.

I was the Queen of Hearts and my friend Kaylee came as evil Alice.  I love my stockings.  I am going to wear them all the time!
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_1000.jpg)
It is me and my best friend!  She came as me.  She is wearing someone elses hat.  She does not think I am a witch.
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_1043.jpg)
I has a cake! OMNOMNOMNOM.  It is a cow cake!
(http://i6.photobucket.com/albums/y247/ebony_willow/100_1048.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 09 Dec 2007, 01:17
Shwimmy, you bear an uncanny resemblance to David Dixon (the guy who played Ford Prefect in the TV version of Hitch Hikers Guide).

Or has that been mentioned already?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 09 Dec 2007, 05:28
It's all been done before.

Usually by me (http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,11935.msg385319.html#msg385319).
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 09 Dec 2007, 05:39
Yikes

I've been Kerbled!  :lol:
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 09 Dec 2007, 05:48
Blank-Facepalm.gif

As in Ben Folds.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 09 Dec 2007, 06:08
I've been Kerbled!

Don't think I won't be telling him. He's making a list and checking it twice. On Xmas Eve he comes down your chimney.

Then he fucks your mother.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Something Witty on 09 Dec 2007, 08:02
Ahaha, I don't think I'll worry about it too much.

(http://i16.tinypic.com/73my9w3.jpg)

So who else has snow and still goes out in it?

It is frozen so bar here right now that they have closed the roads. I'm about to get dressed and go to put a floor in a house.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 09 Dec 2007, 09:09
He's making a list and checking it twice. On Xmas Eve he comes down your chimney.

Then he fucks your mother.

Fukken sig'd
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 09 Dec 2007, 10:03
I dyed my hair!

(http://i18.photobucket.com/albums/b131/sutekitatakai/MyPicture-20.jpg)

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Drill King on 09 Dec 2007, 13:39
Duh buh goofy expression, but seriously. Who doesn't love formal crap with friends?
(http://i3.tinypic.com/72urt4x.jpg)

I bet most of you indie shipsters would clean up real good ;3
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 09 Dec 2007, 15:44
Nice Dress. Also, I need to get a suit like that.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Chrasstor on 09 Dec 2007, 16:14
I'm going to buy a tuxedo and wear it everywhere. We are going to become best friends and I'll tell it everything about me, and it'll tell me everything about it. I'll make us dinner sometimes, and we'll rent movies, and drink good drinks together... We'll stay up late at night, talking about existential philosophies and how some day we want to be in a band together-want to do something that matters with our lives. We won't care about what other people think, because they don't matter when we have each other.

But, then we'll get older... I'll wrinkle, and tears will form in it's fabrics. Inevitably, we'd drift apart from each other, before I ever get to tell that tuxedo that I loved it.

(http://img146.imageshack.us/img146/8861/somethingouttheregv8.jpg)

(http://img205.imageshack.us/img205/7853/crooljp3.jpg)
This life is dangerous,
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Inlander on 09 Dec 2007, 16:39
I dyed my hair!

It really suits you! Especially when you wear that colour of clothing, the two colours combined bring out the colour of your eyes to an amazing extent (if crappy webcam pics can be believed, anyway!).
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 09 Dec 2007, 17:18
Thank you!  It's funny, because my eyes always look blue in pictures, when they are actually light green in person. 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Storm Rider on 09 Dec 2007, 17:33
I dyed my hair!

Paging Katie, to this thread. Katie, to this thread.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: LordNagash on 09 Dec 2007, 17:38
Wow, I do not know how I missed that, yeah the hair color works well.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Wayfaring Stranger on 09 Dec 2007, 21:43
(http://lh6.google.com/Teangeolai/RuHTGTI32WI/AAAAAAAAAQg/pMfNOJBB4TI/bananasignbetter.jpg?imgmax=512)

Funny sign I saw outside a Japanese record store.  Quite true, though.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 09 Dec 2007, 22:04
Make sure you have yourself in pictures in this thread, as per the rules on the first page.  Thanks bunches!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 09 Dec 2007, 22:24
(http://i163.photobucket.com/albums/t282/got_mules/DSCN9437.jpg)
I'm a little emo kid!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: BobJoeJim on 09 Dec 2007, 22:45
By the way, Happy Hanukkah everyone!  I didn't have my own menorah and am too broke to buy one, so this is a strip of stainless steel and 9 bolts ($1.39 total at the hardware store) plus some super glue.
(http://i224.photobucket.com/albums/dd18/BobJoeJim22/DSCN0986.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Mark7 on 10 Dec 2007, 00:29
Yay!  BobJoeJim's evil twin has arrived.  :-D
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 10 Dec 2007, 03:51
Agreeing with everyone above, Grammar. The dark hair suits you much better:) I think it puts more emphasis on your face and matches your eyebrows nicer, it just looks overall lovely!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 10 Dec 2007, 06:44
By the way, Happy Hanukkah everyone!  I didn't have my own menorah and am too broke to buy one, so this is a strip of stainless steel and 9 bolts ($1.39 total at the hardware store) plus some super glue.

This just strikes me as FUCKING HILARIOUS.

Edited 'cause it was previously a lot more dickish and a lot less funny.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 10 Dec 2007, 08:56
(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v209/Seanbateman/Photo49.jpg)

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 10 Dec 2007, 10:48
This olive tree is FUCKING MASSIVE.

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v311/leadhindenburg/IMG_2530.jpg)

Edit: Manda - It's mostly the combination of the stretched out hoodie (my asshole roomie) and the fact that hillclimbing makes that specific pair ride up on my like crazy.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 10 Dec 2007, 11:12
So I remember something where RWS said Patrick could pull off skinny jeans, but guys with skinny legs couldn't. This picture is making her statement make no sense.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Chrasstor on 10 Dec 2007, 12:00
I was under the impression that guys with long skinny legs could pull off skinny jeans best.. I have medium legs, so I'm reluctant to get skinnies.

Also.

(http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/7745/lolerskatesmy4.jpg)
People who know me will tell you that I'm the most unenthusiastic person they know. My sister took this picture of me(CAMERA PHONE boo!).
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Runs_With_Scissors on 10 Dec 2007, 15:58
So I remember something where RWS said Patrick could pull off skinny jeans, but guys with skinny legs couldn't. This picture is making her statement make no sense.


I typed that when I was a bit out of it...meh. What I meant: People with super super skinny/bony legs dont pull off skinny jeans very well. Like, the nasty skinny, not the Patrick skinny.

I think that's what I meant, though I'm not sure.

(sleep deprivation yay...)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 10 Dec 2007, 16:38
I look good in Skinny Jeans.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 10 Dec 2007, 16:51
Dude that is the highest resolution cameraphone picture I have ever seen.

I'm mad jealous of your body structure Patrick.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 10 Dec 2007, 17:07
Every picture I have posted on this forum since you joined has been from the camera on my phone, Eugene.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 10 Dec 2007, 17:15
Stick it in my pooper, Patrick
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: normz on 10 Dec 2007, 17:56
i am ill with tonsilitis so my mother suprised me by bringing a giant rubber duck over to my apartment along with a lifetime supply of lucozade.... yay for bubble baths and massive rubber ducks ... i have named the duck KAD (kick ass duck) but he is also a cad cause i think he smiles quite sleazily when he sees my boobies

(http://i3.photobucket.com/albums/y94/normz/02-12-07_2133.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Slick on 10 Dec 2007, 18:07
SCANDALOUS NORMZ BUBBLE-BATH PIC
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Katherine on 10 Dec 2007, 18:29
(http://i84.photobucket.com/albums/k27/katherinesalisbury/pocky2.jpg)
OM NOM NOM

I've never actually had Pocky but a friend of mine has been looking for some so I grabbed a box for him.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 10 Dec 2007, 18:43
Wait you still haven't had Pocky? Why didn't you grab a box for yourself?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Katherine on 10 Dec 2007, 18:46
I don't really know.  I'm not much of a chocolate fan so I probably wouldn't like it and would rather not waste the money I guess.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lines on 10 Dec 2007, 19:33
There's kinds without chocolate! I like strawberry.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 10 Dec 2007, 20:25
I was pretty disappointed when I tried it, honestly. They're like unsalted pretzel/breadsticks dipped in crappy-grade chocolate.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 10 Dec 2007, 23:13
Basically. I am not one of those people that obsess over it. It's pretty crappy compared to any other dessert. But you might as well try it once.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 11 Dec 2007, 01:56
I've had Pocky before, different flavours. It was disappointing. I'll stick to my pretzel sticks and Nutella, even if I can't find pretzel sticks here very often and have to order them on the inter-knits.

(Ballard I wouldn't recommend this body shape to anybody, it's hard enough finding pants that fit, let alone look half-decent)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tommydski on 11 Dec 2007, 02:53
Wait you still haven't had Pocky? Why didn't you grab a box for yourself?

No Pocky For Katty? (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/No_Pocky_for_Kitty)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 11 Dec 2007, 04:25
Some of you read already, that I got my haircut in three easy steps.

1) Go to a good hairdressers
2) Scissors+Head
3) Pay and leave

Only, I skipped steps 1 and 3.

You can't tell from this image, but my fringe still touches the bottom of my nose at it's longest point.

(http://img207.imageshack.us/img207/1979/photo385xe1.jpg)

Edit: Okay, that was a really forced reference, you can stop Throwing Things.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 11 Dec 2007, 05:33
Not bad at all, Darryl.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 11 Dec 2007, 05:45
I'm impressed! It looks really good Darryl, are you happy with it?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 11 Dec 2007, 05:52
I am! You all thought I'd mess it up horribly, but you were wrong!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Gemmwah on 11 Dec 2007, 05:52
I really did think you'd mess it up horribly, and I have never been more happy to be proved wrong. Well done you.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: öde on 11 Dec 2007, 07:00
Good jerb! The left side looks like you've gelled/stuck it up a bit weird, if you pull it forward it'll look less weird/like a bald patch.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: I is Grammar on 11 Dec 2007, 08:39
Darryl, that looks great!  I'm definitely impressed. 
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 11 Dec 2007, 11:27
I am debating whether or not I should declare "LESS YAPPY MORE SNAPPY" and post a pic, thus allowing myself to break the "2 per page" guideline, or whether I should just wait until the next page + 5 more photos.

Fuck it, I'll just have somebody take my picture (and hopefully not camera) in Munich tomorrow and post when I get to CA. Stormy, PM me.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Chrasstor on 11 Dec 2007, 11:39
Some of you read already, that I got my haircut in three easy steps.

1) Go to a good hairdressers
2) Scissors+Head
3) Pay and leave

Only, I skipped steps 1 and 3.
Yeah, I cut my hair myself for the first time going on a week ago. It was pretty fun.

Good job! I want to encourage more people to do this... It's not THAT hard.
EDIT: SNAPPY SINCE THIS IS THE NEW PAGE OF A PICTURE THREAD
(http://img262.imageshack.us/img262/6206/thinkerpx4.jpg)
Should i destroy fascists? this is going to take some thinking.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 11 Dec 2007, 12:09
Actually, I suggest that you don't cut your own hair, unless you want a cut like mine, or, if your hair is long, the 'Edward Scissorhands' look.
As a rule, if you cut you own hair, it will NEVER be even.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ozymandias on 11 Dec 2007, 12:43
THAT IS THE SECOND BIGGEST GUITAR I'VE EVER SEEN
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 11 Dec 2007, 12:45
i think it's a bass?

also: foreshortening!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 11 Dec 2007, 12:57
Is that Scottish shortbread on your dresser? Want plz
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Scandanavian War Machine on 11 Dec 2007, 13:53
there's nothing wrong with cutting your own hair. i've always cut my own hair. i haven't actually paid for a hair cut since i was a toddler. and obviously my parents paid for it then.


new shoes!

(http://a434.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/115/l_e5044595c3d2a5be31013845b2df7709.gif)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Dissy on 11 Dec 2007, 14:15
Whoa!  The picture is dancing.  I feel like I'm watching a portrait in Hogwarts
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Scandanavian War Machine on 11 Dec 2007, 14:21
yeah, since i'm white i have to create the illusion of rhythm through animated GIFs.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 11 Dec 2007, 14:25
foreshortening!
(http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y120/jhocking/4short.jpg)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Liz on 11 Dec 2007, 19:45
I cut my own hair, but since mine is long and curly it's not really a big deal.

Also, Joe, please feature that facial expression in every photo you taken of you from now on. It made me chuckle.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: ruyi on 11 Dec 2007, 20:21
peanut butter update

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v321/coolcathay/Photo19.jpg)

i'm never keeping one of these in my room ever again.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 11 Dec 2007, 20:43
I still prefer my method of eating peanut butter.

Also what kind of America-hating communist are you? Eating Skippy like that... you ought to be ashamed, young lady.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 11 Dec 2007, 22:18
Some of you read already, that I got my haircut in three easy steps.

1) Go to a good hairdressers
2) Scissors+Head
3) Pay and leave

Only, I skipped steps 1 and 3.

You can't tell from this image, but my fringe still touches the bottom of my nose at it's longest point.

(http://Dazzy)


Dude what the hell are you doing for New Year's? You never told me. Come to Brighton, you fucking wanker.





Also I Is Grammar: I have no words. I am sorry for this. I really am.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Hat on 12 Dec 2007, 03:48
Obviously, I have not read the rules of the photo thread? So here is the most important and best quality photo from my little spamming session, which is the place where I shit.

(http://img223.imageshack.us/img223/1913/image008qw1.jpg)

Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: SeanBateman on 12 Dec 2007, 07:50
You have been here long enough to know that that post does not at all fit into the rules of this thread.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Spinless on 12 Dec 2007, 08:23
Yeah, that is one crazy large post.


Katie, I have no plans for Christmas or New Years, but at the same time, I also have no money. Again. I'm paying off 300 debt I have to my grandfather.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: 0bsessions on 12 Dec 2007, 10:46
I still prefer my method of eating peanut butter, that is to say I like to eat peanut butter off the genitals of homeless men.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Aimless on 12 Dec 2007, 11:19
I am rough with roughnecks:

(http://img85.imageshack.us/img85/2871/roughonroughnecksky5.jpg)

Got the rings from my best mates today as an early christmas presents. I love them :D there's a story behind them, and I feel I am like the phantom in mny ways, despite looking like hell in tights.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: pen on 12 Dec 2007, 11:22
I am rough with roughnecks

I read that first as "I am rough with rednecks."
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Scandanavian War Machine on 12 Dec 2007, 12:23
As did I.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Drill King on 12 Dec 2007, 16:40
Just to state what people are saying about cutting your own hair. Plz don't(even though I usually do), put food on my table(my mother is a hairstylist).
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: jhocking on 12 Dec 2007, 18:26
I remember a Charlie Brown strip I read when I was a kid where Charlie and another character are sitting around discussing how things are getting more expensive.

other dude: My dad is even cutting my hair to save money.
Charlie: I hope he cuts your ears off.               note - charlie brown's dad is a barber

I always thought that was a little dark for Peanuts.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: onewheelwizzard on 12 Dec 2007, 19:09
http://gallery.mac.com/kraz/100013/sortinghat5/web.jpg

Harry Potter Day at the UPenn Anthropology and Archeology Museum.  I was the voice of the Sorting Hat.  My professor was organizing the event, so the whole class participated for credit.

Ack!  Too big.  How do I resize?
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: tania on 12 Dec 2007, 19:21
Charlie: I hope he cuts your ears off.

isn't charlie brown like 8 years old? wow.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: MobyDickhole on 12 Dec 2007, 20:12
(http://photos-d.ak.facebook.com/photos-ak-sctm/v158/211/34/2501031/n2501031_37942063_7518.jpg)

It's Official.
I know nothing.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: redglasscurls on 12 Dec 2007, 20:28
The first thing I thought on seeing that photo was not that it was odd to put a Hello Kitty hat on a cat, but that it had included the whisker lines, seeing how cats supply their own.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Scandanavian War Machine on 12 Dec 2007, 20:49
yeah, what are those whisker lines there for?

maybe the hat is intended for babies...or a different animal? i don't know. accesories for animals/babies are stupid.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Lunchbox on 12 Dec 2007, 21:14
Hey, I did not know cats posted on this board! Hello, MobyDickhole! It is good to see that felines are finally starting to understand computers, instead of walking haphazardly over keys! Or is that not a picture of you? Hm.

ANYWAY:

IN THIS PICTURE I LOOK LIKE A GIGANTIC LOSER

(http://farm3.static.flickr.com/2089/2107109925_9fe4ef665a.jpg)

BUT DON'T TRY TO TELL ME YOU DON'T WANT HUGS
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: squawk on 12 Dec 2007, 21:30
Want!
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: est on 12 Dec 2007, 21:36
Ally!  I will hug you!

Although, I have been at home sick the last couple of days so you may wish to take a raincheck until I am well.  This is what an est looks like when he is sick at home, cooking steak for late lunch:

(http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v371/est_xplosif/est_the_cook.jpg)

The steak is delicious, by the way (om nom nom nom)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Ballard on 12 Dec 2007, 23:10
Awesome apron. Do want.
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: calenlass on 12 Dec 2007, 23:11
http://www.dieselsweeties.com/shirts/aprons.shtml (http://www.dieselsweeties.com/shirts/aprons.shtml)
Title: Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
Post by: Patrick on 12 Dec 2007, 23:31
It's the stubble that did it for me. Rrr