THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 22 May 2024, 21:05
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 40 41 [42] 43 44 ... 53   Go Down

Author Topic: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM  (Read 464175 times)

I is Grammar

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 188
  • Advocatus diaboli
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2050 on: 16 Dec 2007, 13:27 »

BobJoeJim, that face will haunt me for years to come. 
Logged
I've got a small sticky-out scar like a third nipple just under my right manboob from where I was bitten by another kid in Year 3.

BobJoeJim

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2051 on: 16 Dec 2007, 13:30 »

Victory for Zim!
« Last Edit: 16 Dec 2007, 13:35 by BobJoeJim »
Logged

jodizzle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,253
  • Stairs will tear us apart
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2052 on: 16 Dec 2007, 16:00 »

Today is my birthday!  This is what the boy got me.

I pulled all the limbs off my knght!  BEST PRESENT EVER!
Logged
Quote from: Hannah in Meebly
you it be the mics taht are broked?
Quote from: ViolentDove
But then again, I used to dress like the bastard child of a drug-addled punk and a shrubbery.

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2053 on: 16 Dec 2007, 16:54 »

That is just the kind of sadistic shit I expect from Monty Python.

I like it.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

mooface

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2054 on: 16 Dec 2007, 18:18 »

Also, more pictures of proudly big noses pls

you called?



can you tell that i am a roman?  because i am.
Logged

IronOxide

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,429
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2055 on: 16 Dec 2007, 18:49 »

Holy shit that thing is super adorable.
Logged
Quote from: Wikipedia on Elephant Polo
No matches have been played since February 2007, however, when an elephant, protesting a bad call by the referee, went on a rampage during a game, injuring two players and destroying the Spanish team's minibus

audacity

  • Larger than most fish
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 100
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2056 on: 16 Dec 2007, 19:00 »

AWWW. Also, nice scarf!
Logged

Ally

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2057 on: 16 Dec 2007, 19:01 »

It is my mom's scarf!

And thanks IO, but you don't have to call me "that thing."
Logged

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2058 on: 16 Dec 2007, 21:52 »

All you can see is your bum. Carry on, IO.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

valley_parade

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,169
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2059 on: 17 Dec 2007, 07:08 »

this monday was...
MOUSTACHE
MONDAY

Sam you're like 4 years younger than I am. Why do you get the ability to grow that? *grumble*
Logged
Wait so you're letting something that happened 10 years ago ruin your quality of life? What are you, America? :psyduck:

Liz

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,483
  • Nuclear Bomb Tits
    • Last.fm
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2060 on: 17 Dec 2007, 07:09 »

Because despite his age, Sam is a real man.
Logged
Quote from: John
Liz is touching me.
Quote from: Bryan
Fuck you, I want him so bad.

valley_parade

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,169
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2061 on: 17 Dec 2007, 07:11 »

I feel like Pinocchio, but with a small nose. I WILL NEVER BE A REAL BOY.

Maybe I'll wear my hair FORWARD when it gets long. So you can't see my lack of facial hair.
Logged
Wait so you're letting something that happened 10 years ago ruin your quality of life? What are you, America? :psyduck:

Skibas_clavicle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,278
  • Mo' money, mo' problem.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2062 on: 17 Dec 2007, 10:50 »

but what should I put in my second holes?


another dick?
Seriously, Drill King, why do you think Kieffer's dating the girl with the big tunnels in her ears?
Logged
I like the way you work it.

Drill King

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,514
  • The Monster of Man
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2063 on: 17 Dec 2007, 12:20 »

I demand pictures of such ear stretching.
Logged
King of Kings baby.

photoblog tumblr

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2064 on: 17 Dec 2007, 12:33 »

She's the pretty girl with the piercings all through this thread.
Logged

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2065 on: 17 Dec 2007, 12:52 »

Very smooth, mang.
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

Drill King

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,514
  • The Monster of Man
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2066 on: 17 Dec 2007, 12:53 »

She's the pretty girl with the piercings all through this thread.

There's only one?
Logged
King of Kings baby.

photoblog tumblr

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2067 on: 17 Dec 2007, 12:54 »

(Hence why I said he was very smooth. All suckin up to his lady, etc.)
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

Drill King

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,514
  • The Monster of Man
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2068 on: 17 Dec 2007, 13:10 »

From what I can tell, he just sucked up to a lot of pretty pierced ladies on here.
Logged
King of Kings baby.

photoblog tumblr

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2069 on: 17 Dec 2007, 13:12 »

No actually he implied that other pierced girls aren't pretty.

(I think he was talking about metal embedded in the face, in which case yeah she's pretty much the only one with many photos in this thread.)
« Last Edit: 17 Dec 2007, 13:17 by jhocking »
Logged

Skibas_clavicle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,278
  • Mo' money, mo' problem.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2070 on: 17 Dec 2007, 13:37 »

Aw, shucks, dudes. To be fair there hasn't been a picture of me at all for 12 pages, and there hasn't been a recent once in 15 pages. I no longer exist in physical form.
Logged
I like the way you work it.

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2071 on: 17 Dec 2007, 13:46 »

You know what to do.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

audacity

  • Larger than most fish
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 100
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2072 on: 17 Dec 2007, 15:36 »

You know what to do.


Lather, rinse, repeat?
Logged

Mark7

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 314
  • My sandbox is crunchy
    • My Music
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2073 on: 17 Dec 2007, 15:50 »

Oh great...

Another beautiful girl  :roll:

Aintcha sick of em? :P
Logged
Will be at your local record store this Friday handing out the hot dickings

Mark7

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 314
  • My sandbox is crunchy
    • My Music
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2074 on: 17 Dec 2007, 16:04 »

Yeah. I seem to have gotten lazy lately.

This is the only thread I actually get alerted of replies to.
Logged
Will be at your local record store this Friday handing out the hot dickings

Cartilage Head

  • Only pretending to work
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,182
  • Do Me Baby
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2075 on: 17 Dec 2007, 16:04 »

 My camera currently isn't working. This is the picture I would take, had I a working camera.

Logged
Hate, rain on me

Ballard

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,211
  • This is my happening and it freaks me out!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2076 on: 17 Dec 2007, 16:38 »

In honor of winter, new Docs!




Logged
I'm like the boy who cried "you guys are faggots"

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2077 on: 17 Dec 2007, 16:39 »

Another beautiful girl (snip, I hate smileys) Aintcha sick of em? (snip again)

The drunk thread is this way dude.

Ballard I like your rug.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2078 on: 17 Dec 2007, 17:39 »

Are you saying Ballard's a girl?
Logged

Emaline

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,796
  • Drink, Drank, DRUNK
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2079 on: 17 Dec 2007, 17:59 »

Ballard, I was just looking at those boots! I think I might want a pair, though the military surplus store has some pretty sweet boots too.
Logged
little bitty bird, with the flaxen hair, can i help you with the weight of the cross you bear?

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2080 on: 17 Dec 2007, 18:25 »

Are you saying Ballard's a girl?

You've got the wrong rug, officer.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

David_Dovey

  • Nearly grown up
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8,451
  • j'accuse!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2081 on: 17 Dec 2007, 19:17 »

He's saying Ballard's bald.

I found some stylish glasses at Daft Punk:



I r stylish cat, this is stylish thread.

(yes i know those are girl glasses)
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

Jimmy the Squid

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,543
  • Feminist Killjoy
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2082 on: 17 Dec 2007, 19:29 »

Do you also know that you look like you're about to vomit?

My girlfriend had her birthday dinner at a swanky Singaporean restaurant. Here is my brother and I at said restaurant.
Logged
Once I got drunk and threw up in the vegetable drawer of an old disused fridge while dressed as a cat

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2083 on: 17 Dec 2007, 19:57 »

I'm sorry Jimmy, your brother's attire is infinitely better than yours.
Logged

mberan42

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,174
  • Fry... You're my friend...
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2084 on: 17 Dec 2007, 20:05 »

i wish the delete post function was still in effect
« Last Edit: 17 Dec 2007, 21:25 by mberan42 »
Logged
My parents were always on me to groom myself and wear underpants. What am I, the pope?!

DonInKansas

  • FIGHT YOU
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 427
  • Grammar Nazi
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2085 on: 17 Dec 2007, 20:31 »

I totally thought that was Jon Lovitz on the left for a moment.

I r needing sleep.....
Logged
I mean, it would still suck, but at least it would suck creatively.

Ballard

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,211
  • This is my happening and it freaks me out!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2086 on: 17 Dec 2007, 20:43 »

Thanks Pat.

Emaline, these are infinitely more comfortable than military surplus boots. Also I look really dumb in military boots because most of my clothing is tight fitting and colorful. Which is the main reason I got these Docs in brown.
Logged
I'm like the boy who cried "you guys are faggots"

Jimmy the Squid

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,543
  • Feminist Killjoy
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2087 on: 18 Dec 2007, 01:19 »

I totally thought that was Jon Lovitz on the left for a moment.

I r needing sleep.....

Heh, if you ever said that to him he would tear out your throat and spit into your oesophagus. He would travel all the way to Kansas to do this.

Oh and Harry, it's ok. Very few people can appreciate a black and grey mesh shirt whereas heaps of people can appreciate The Pogues.
« Last Edit: 18 Dec 2007, 01:21 by JimmytheSquid »
Logged
Once I got drunk and threw up in the vegetable drawer of an old disused fridge while dressed as a cat

Spinless

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2088 on: 18 Dec 2007, 10:39 »

I should not smile, at least not this hard.

I didn't notice until this picture, but Dan is pretty much the best looking male Brit on the forums, right?
Logged

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2089 on: 18 Dec 2007, 10:48 »

Tommy's about to break 8,000.
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

Boro_Bandito

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,270
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2090 on: 18 Dec 2007, 18:24 »

Whilst out shopping for a christmas present for my older brother I got this shirt for myself half off. Amadeus likes it I think.

http://i4.photobucket.com/albums/y110/Wildkyn/FloggingMollyshirt.jpg
Logged
Yeah, I mean, "I won't kill and eat you if you won't kill and eat me" is typically a ground rule for social groups.

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2091 on: 18 Dec 2007, 18:39 »

your av makes me think you're that panda furry chick.
Logged

Boro_Bandito

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,270
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2092 on: 18 Dec 2007, 18:52 »

Well, I actually found the avatar for a friend whose username on AIM is DotPanda, but he didn't like it and I thought it was too funny not to use somewhere.

So I guess the good news is that I know who I am?
Logged
Yeah, I mean, "I won't kill and eat you if you won't kill and eat me" is typically a ground rule for social groups.

ruyi

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 740
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2093 on: 18 Dec 2007, 19:22 »

your av makes me think you're that panda furry chick.

actually it's a dude. ryld is, i mean.
Logged

Boro_Bandito

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,270
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2094 on: 18 Dec 2007, 19:26 »

Oh god, no, I'm not Ryld.
Logged
Yeah, I mean, "I won't kill and eat you if you won't kill and eat me" is typically a ground rule for social groups.

SeanBateman

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2095 on: 18 Dec 2007, 19:36 »

you should probably change your avatar then.
Logged

jodizzle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,253
  • Stairs will tear us apart
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2096 on: 18 Dec 2007, 19:38 »

I has a new jacket.  it cost me $12!  I love it so much!  It is RED


Why is it always so low quality goddammit. Fixed!
« Last Edit: 18 Dec 2007, 19:56 by ebony_willow »
Logged
Quote from: Hannah in Meebly
you it be the mics taht are broked?
Quote from: ViolentDove
But then again, I used to dress like the bastard child of a drug-addled punk and a shrubbery.

Jimmy the Squid

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,543
  • Feminist Killjoy
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2097 on: 18 Dec 2007, 19:42 »

You are aware that bright orange evokes feelings of hostility in most people, or at least in me, right? Because that jacket just made me want to throw you off a bridge. Not like, a high bridge or into something that might injure you, but certainly into something that will stop you from wearing it again. On the other hand, the cut if really nice, I'm just not into bright colours...or any colours.
Logged
Once I got drunk and threw up in the vegetable drawer of an old disused fridge while dressed as a cat

jodizzle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,253
  • Stairs will tear us apart
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2098 on: 18 Dec 2007, 19:48 »

Its RED.  Very RED.  There is nothing wrong with RED.


(It is not in the slightest bit orange)
Logged
Quote from: Hannah in Meebly
you it be the mics taht are broked?
Quote from: ViolentDove
But then again, I used to dress like the bastard child of a drug-addled punk and a shrubbery.

Jimmy the Squid

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,543
  • Feminist Killjoy
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2099 on: 18 Dec 2007, 19:57 »

Well it looks orange, but I suppose I will have to suspend judgement upon you until you come to Sydney (while wearing the jacket of course) for a forum meeting.

Oh ok, picture...

Excellent?
Logged
Once I got drunk and threw up in the vegetable drawer of an old disused fridge while dressed as a cat
Pages: 1 ... 40 41 [42] 43 44 ... 53   Go Up