THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Comic Discussion => QUESTIONABLE CONTENT => Topic started by: westrim on 30 Jun 2013, 12:33

Title: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 30 Jun 2013, 12:33
Here is the thread and a poll (no dancing on it, please.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 30 Jun 2013, 12:40
I think I know which poll option is going to win.  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 30 Jun 2013, 12:42
Are the Kujawiak and Mazur Pole dances?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 30 Jun 2013, 12:52
Which ones have the Superhero Delivery People?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 30 Jun 2013, 13:09
Penny was never employed at a pizza place, Pizza Girl was/is. Penelope had a job at a bookstore being ogled by the manager.

Actually, that's a point; what do you suppose the CoD crew would do to him should he ever turn up? The place can't be too far away if penne-lope was stopping there on her way home….
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TinPenguin on 30 Jun 2013, 13:21
Screw space stations, I want to work somewhere I get to dress up as a Victorian gent.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 30 Jun 2013, 13:34
I think I know which poll option is going to win.  :-D
Yeah, but it's important to have options.

Penny was never employed at a pizza place, Pizza Girl was/is.
:mrgreen: You can deny it all you want, we know that Penny is Pizza Girl.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 30 Jun 2013, 13:42
Screw space stations, I want to work somewhere I get to dress up as a Victorian gent.

Hear, hear!  I look sharp in victorian kit, and apparently have a knack for listening & selling alcohol...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ChaoSera on 30 Jun 2013, 13:49
As a (future) scientist, the only viable option for me is the space station. SPAAAAAAAAACE! (yes, that was a portal joke)

Second place would be The Horrible Revelation, though.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 30 Jun 2013, 13:51
So many people voting Space Station  :psyduck: Why? It requires a lot of exercise, you are locked up with the same 200 people or so and you cannot get out. Sure, the view is great, and you get bragging rights, but otherwise I fail to see the appeal.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 30 Jun 2013, 13:55
So many people voting Space Station  :psyduck: Why? It requires a lot of exercise, you are locked up with the same 200 people or so and you cannot get out. Sure, the view is great, and you get bragging rights, but otherwise I fail to see the appeal.
Lasers! (Hopefully not dye lasers, though)

I'll have a double racist grandma on the rocks, thanks.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 30 Jun 2013, 14:08
As a (future) scientist, the only viable option for me is the space station. SPAAAAAAAAACE! (yes, that was a portal joke)

I know you are mate! Yep. We're both in space.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 30 Jun 2013, 14:17
It does lack a certain atmosphere, but I think I could make myself useful on the station. I'd volunteer for a lot of EVA window cleaning duty.
Failing that, Earthside ground support for Spaceship.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 30 Jun 2013, 14:20
It does lack a certain atmosphere

Please consider tipping the pun jar.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 30 Jun 2013, 14:28
But if he tips it over, how will it ever hold any more puns? 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Welu on 30 Jun 2013, 14:54
I picked Sven's assistant because that's how much I want to see more of him.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 30 Jun 2013, 14:57
But if he tips it over, how will it ever hold any more puns?
Cesium already tipped it over, that's why it's sideways.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 30 Jun 2013, 15:16
He could always tip it back up so it can hold puns again.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 30 Jun 2013, 15:24
I'm not touching that thing.

Besides, you broke it (http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,29044.msg1165784.html#msg1165784), you make it right again  :x
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Renewman on 30 Jun 2013, 15:24
Yup, Marigold likes him.  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Zebediah on 30 Jun 2013, 16:14
Screw space stations, I want to work somewhere I get to dress up as a Victorian gent.

Why can't you dress up as a Victorian gent on the space station?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: WAYF on 30 Jun 2013, 18:02
Because Victorian gentlemen have a certain air of British dignity, old chap about them. It's hard to be dignified when you're bouncing around on a space station in zero gravity. :P

I have no such dignity, so I would be happy to be, e.g. a janitor on the space station or something. That'd be awesome. (It's about the only thing I would qualify for up there. Probably every other job involves literal rocket science.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 30 Jun 2013, 18:10
*dances on the poll in a very erotic fashion*

No coins please.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 30 Jun 2013, 21:01
Nowhere that Cosette has ever worked.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 30 Jun 2013, 21:11
*dances on the poll in a very erotic fashion*

No coins please.
*throws the quarters that Loki keeps demanding for the pun jar at GarandMarine*
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DrBear on 30 Jun 2013, 21:25
So many people voting Space Station  :psyduck: Why?
Two words: Spathe. Ham.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mtmerrick on 30 Jun 2013, 21:52
I nearly voted LANpark. :P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 30 Jun 2013, 22:09
I set it to allow people to change their votes, but I don't see any option to do so.

As for puns, I have a solution! Here's a pun box |_| To cover it, here's a lid _, and here's a roll of tape to repair any holes o
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: celticgeek on 30 Jun 2013, 22:13
I bet that Veronica would do it, too.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Skewbrow on 30 Jun 2013, 22:25
It does lack a certain atmosphere, but I think I could make myself useful on the station. I'd volunteer for a lot of EVA window cleaning duty.
A lot of stardust building up there. Your employment will be secure!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 30 Jun 2013, 22:27
I have no such dignity, so I would be happy to be, e.g. a janitor on the space station or something. That'd be awesome. (It's about the only thing I would qualify for up there. Probably every other job involves literal rocket science.)
Can you follow and memorize simple directions in English? If so I'll hire you as an assistant in my lab on the space station to help with running the lasers.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Skaltura on 30 Jun 2013, 22:39
What's next? Dora's parents start swinging with Marten's Dad and Maurice? :-P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 30 Jun 2013, 23:17
Jim is arithmetically young enough to be her child.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 01 Jul 2013, 00:17
Source?

The instant Tai went "hmmmm...", I knew it couldn't be good.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 01 Jul 2013, 00:36
Source?

Jim is 40 (41 now) (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1954).

The only clues I could gather from Dora's parents age wise is her dad goosed Nancy Regan while she was the First Lady (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1043). Or am I not getting the query right?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 01 Jul 2013, 00:37
Jim's only 41, assuming he's had that birthday he was talking about. 

Depending on Veronica's age when Marten was born, if she was mid-twenties as he is now, she's be late forties / early fifties.  Could be pushing 60, though, if she were early 30's when Marten was born. 


How did Jim and Dora's folks wind up involved?   Focus, people, focus!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 01 Jul 2013, 00:39
Carl: TvTropes Pair The Spares, I think, it is called.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 01 Jul 2013, 00:46
56 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2385).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 01 Jul 2013, 00:48
Train wreck anyone?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 01 Jul 2013, 01:46
Oh lord. Either it's random throwaway humor or it's foreshadowing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 01 Jul 2013, 02:08
Ah, but it would be a BEAUTIFUL train wreck. :)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 01 Jul 2013, 02:46
Penelope had a job at a bookstore being ogled by the manager.
Actually, that's a point; what do you suppose the CoD crew would do to him should he ever turn up? The place can't be too far away if penne-lope was stopping there on her way home….

Milk in the face? Bondage? Threatening by sword? So many precedents...or maybe he has a new job as an exterminator?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mlle Germain on 01 Jul 2013, 04:13
I also picked the space station, since I consider myself  as a future scientist, too. I'm surprised so few people picked CoD, though. That would definitely have been my second option. Or maybe the library.
As for Jim and Veronica: I sort of don't see that happen. And that has absolutely nothing to do with age difference. I mean, how would they happen to meet if Marten does not want to participate in setting them up (which I in his situation certainly would not do).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 01 Jul 2013, 04:27
I also picked the space station, since I consider myself  as a future scientist, too. I'm surprised so few people picked CoD, though. That would definitely have been my second option. Or maybe the library.
As for Jim and Veronica: I sort of don't see that happen. And that has absolutely nothing to do with age difference. I mean, how would they happen to meet if Marten does not want to participate in setting them up (which I in his situation certainly would not do).

Veronica drops by while on a trip to NY to, ahem, talk with her publishers. She takes another walkabout, this time down a street no one ever knew was there, gets hungry for baked goods, and ...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: toffee-skye on 01 Jul 2013, 05:40
i feel i'd be in the same boat as Marigold in zero-gravity, and i'm usually pretty good at holding on to my lunch!  :-(
so i voted Coffee of Doom. but i don't know if they'd take another big-butted hipster girl with black glasses (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=289).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: muon on 01 Jul 2013, 08:39
I chose the space station, seeing as how I'm a scientist and all, although being a theoretical physicist, there's not really any reason for me to be in space other than the cool factor. Come to think of it, though, microgravity might not be the best for skirt-wearing, and I do so very much enjoy skirts. Perhaps I should reconsider.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 01 Jul 2013, 09:42
There are always culottes. They'll probably bunch up less, too, if you have to get into your spacesuit right away.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 01 Jul 2013, 10:37
Team Space Station here, I'm sure Lt. Potter's security team can find a use for me. "Orbital Designated Marksman" I like the sound of that. If not I'll go work for Hannersmom, selling your soul out pays surprisingly well, and we have similar aesthetic tastes. (Make a pile of human skulls)

In other news, oh what a tangled web we weave jephizba! Martin you might end up with a step sister in her /teens/ out of this! Can you really risk it? Can you really take the chance? There's only one option new friend. You have to kill the little one and dispose of the body before her idea spreads further.

That aside Martinmom is A. hot and B. awesome, so I can't see Jim not being up for that.

Till the whips come out any way.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mlle Germain on 01 Jul 2013, 11:22
..., although being a theoretical physicist, there's not really any reason for me to be in space other than the cool factor.

Ohhh, me too! Theoretical physicist, I mean. Aspiring mathematical physicist, in fact, though still a student. What do you do?
I still think the space station is a good idea, because there are so many apparently excellent scientists around to exchange ideas with. Some of them actually seemed to be theorists.
(Little anecdote on "scientists" I just thought of: In the application for my master's degree, I accidentally typed scientits. Almost would have submitted it like that, too! Luckily, I still noticed.)

Edit: Fixed typo.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 01 Jul 2013, 11:25
Edit: Fixed typo.

Which one? :P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 01 Jul 2013, 13:29
Come to think of it, though, microgravity might not be the best for skirt-wearing, and I do so very much enjoy skirts. Perhaps I should reconsider.

The residential areas are spun up, at least. Even if you did something experimental, the only lab we saw seemed to be as well.

EDIT: Jeph is asking on Twitter what the verb is for what a dominatrix does. Apparently the idea in the previous strip will be continued.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 02 Jul 2013, 00:18
Come to think of it, though, microgravity might not be the best for skirt-wearing, and I do so very much enjoy skirts. Perhaps I should reconsider.
The residential areas are spun up, at least. Even if you did something experimental, the only lab we saw seemed to be as well.
I do not see any incompatibility between zero gravity and skirts.  :evil:

Why was the lab in a rotating area anyway? I mean, if you're going to go through the trouble of taking your equipment into space, why would you then conduct experiments just as easily done on Earth?


That aside Martinmom is B. awesome.
I have to disagree with that. It's going to take several dozen more positive appearances, or at least some regret, for me to forgive her conduct after The Breakup.

*dances on the poll in a very erotic fashion*
No coins please.
*Chucks shredded and supercompressed dollar bills*
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 02 Jul 2013, 01:49
Why does Claire think Veronica is really nice?

Wouldn't any scientist want to work with the best in the field? And go where those are, be it another country or low earth orbit?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 02 Jul 2013, 02:01
Those eyes......nightmare fuel.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: K1dmor on 02 Jul 2013, 02:14
Why does Claire think Veronica is really nice?

 They didn't talk to much, after this (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2379) innocent chat. But i guess they get along well.
 (http://i.imgur.com/PzpX1sp.jpg)
 

 Also, this would be the second time we see those eyes, am i right?
 (http://i.imgur.com/rm2698m.jpg)(http://i.imgur.com/0LoLP0e.jpg)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 02 Jul 2013, 02:18
Jeph is asking on Twitter what the verb is for what a dominatrix does.
Dominate? Suddenly I have a flash of a Dalek in a leather bikini shouting "Dom-in-ate! Dom-in-ATE! Dom-IN-ATE! DOM-IN-ATE!"

I don't actually enjoy rom-coms much...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ZoeB on 02 Jul 2013, 02:20
I think it would be more like an educational program than a rom-com.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 02 Jul 2013, 02:42
I'm with Marten on this one, I can't get on board that ship.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 02 Jul 2013, 02:45
Speaking of Doctor Who and domination (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Dominators), though Akima's idea is going to stick in my mind for some time. Everyone knows about the Microsoft Dalek, right?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 02 Jul 2013, 02:48
Veronica's first meeting with Claire was a bit too overbearing for me to have considered it "very nice" had I been in Claire's place. Maybe when they were offscreen she saw the other side of her personality. We saw that side when VV was quite gentlemanly to Faye except for the threat.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: katsmeat on 02 Jul 2013, 03:14
Surely this will only work out long term if, by amazing coincidence, Jim happens to be a sub. Or if not, is happy to give her a free pass to go and domme other chaps now and again... hilarity ensues etc.

Not that I know anything at all about the dynamics of a BDSM/vanilla mixed relationships (assuming he is v.)  as pretty much the sum total of my knowledge of BDSM comes from Wikipedia and listening to Dan Savage.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesariojpn on 02 Jul 2013, 03:39
Not that I know anything at all about the dynamics of a BDSM/vanilla mixed relationships (assuming he is v.)  as pretty much the sum total of my knowledge of BDSM comes from Wikipedia and listening to Dan Savage.

BDSM relationships are a mixed bag. Many folks manage to get along very well with each other and have satisfiable/successful relationships, others kinda throw out the stigma that "Bondage is Bad" trope. And some people kinda take the power trip too far........like they think that just because you call yourself a Dominant, you have carte blanche rights to tell any submissive to submit to them immediately.

One benefit with BDSM/Fetishes is that given the various roles and fetishes out there, one can usually find a setup that suits them perfectly. Unless your fetish is like Gynophagia or something ridiculously obscure.........   
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 02 Jul 2013, 03:50
The only reason for this gag is to embarrass Marten, which it seems to be succeeding in doing.  I see absolutely no likelihood of it happening.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 02 Jul 2013, 03:58
It can't just be that. Too much work for too easy a target. It's like hopping on one leg, blindfolded, while drunk, attempting to shoot the broadside of a barn. Only you're using a pre-laid cannon with the trigger cord tied to your ankle.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mad Cat on 02 Jul 2013, 04:07
Anime eyes! … IN STEREO!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Zebediah on 02 Jul 2013, 04:22
I think I can guess the panel for the next QC Captions entry.  :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 02 Jul 2013, 04:46
I think I can guess the panel for the next QC Captions entry.  :-D

Now, why would you think that?

Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Throg on 02 Jul 2013, 05:21
A rom-com...where the female is an ex-dominatrix, looking to retire?!

...

FUND IT
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 02 Jul 2013, 05:28
Cliche situation: V2 becomes instant happy little domestic with Jim as the dominant personality in the relationship. Both are insanely happy, to the point where observers get cavities just thinking about it.
Marten spends the rest of his life twitchy, waiting for something bad to happen.

... I thought QC already *was* part romcom with Marten as the straight man.

Akima: That's an interesting image. Are you envisioning the standard-chassis Dalek or a DW version of a "skin job"?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 02 Jul 2013, 05:39
VV marries Jim. By the Law Of Conservation Of Comedy, it logically follows that Sam walks in on... stuff.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 02 Jul 2013, 05:42
Of course, this way Marten gets to call Jim "Dad III; Vengeance"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 02 Jul 2013, 05:44
Sam is brought up as new Marten.

Coming soon: QC Spinoff with adult Sam frequenting a coffee shop with sassy male indie baristas…
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Zebediah on 02 Jul 2013, 06:24
Ah, so that's why Jeph is bringing Dale on as a barista! It all makes sense now!

No it doesn't.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 02 Jul 2013, 06:42
Dale has a secret child whom he will raise to be like Marten. Or Dora. We won't be able to tell. The child will become the sassy barista.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: kent_eh on 02 Jul 2013, 06:46
Ummm.. Marten?

I hate to break it to you, but in the current company, you are the straight man.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 02 Jul 2013, 06:49
Everyone knows about the Microsoft Dalek, right?

Apparently not. 


Yes, I live in a hole.  And google only got me a youtube video that's been pulled for BBC copyright restrictions...


Veronica's first meeting with Claire was a bit too overbearing for me to have considered it "very nice" had I been in Claire's place. Maybe when they were offscreen she saw the other side of her personality. We saw that side when VV was quite gentlemanly to Faye except for the threat.

Claire also spent a good bit of that visit making friends with scotch.  That may have tinted her view a bit! 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 02 Jul 2013, 06:52
Claire also spent a good bit of that visit making friends with scotch.  That may have tinted her view a bit!
If they became friends, it's a pretty abusive relationship.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 02 Jul 2013, 07:11
A rom-com...where the female is an ex-dominatrix, looking to retire?!
SHE is a dominatrix trying to get out of the field. HE is a bakery owner. THEY FIGHT CRIME.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 02 Jul 2013, 07:21
Melinda Clarke plays Veronica.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 02 Jul 2013, 07:23
Nah. Torri Higginson or Michelle Morgan.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 02 Jul 2013, 07:26
Michelle Morgan is way too young! What about Marisa Tomei?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Rghfrgl on 02 Jul 2013, 08:01
 Last panel is so kawaii that it's making me use the word kawaii.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Game and Watch Forever on 02 Jul 2013, 08:12
If Marten hates being the straight man, then I suddenly understand why he seems to have such disdain for Claire puns.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 02 Jul 2013, 08:14
Oh Marten, the universe has made you the straight man for the entire universe, yes you get a shot in now and then, but it's just your place.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 02 Jul 2013, 08:33
Michelle Morgan is way too young! What about Marisa Tomei?
Future proofing. It could take years to get this project off the ground and we want someone who can stick around for a few seasons at least.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 02 Jul 2013, 09:07
Wait, I thought we were talking movie, not series.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 02 Jul 2013, 09:20
Well, then you thought wrong and shall be punished appropriately  :x
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 02 Jul 2013, 09:24
We're talking movie/pilot then series. It's gonna revolutionise the industry!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Masterpiece on 02 Jul 2013, 09:25
Well, then you thought wrong and shall be punished appropriately  :x
More like PUN-ished, amirite?

(I am not. I lift the tipped pun jar, and put in 3 internets)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 02 Jul 2013, 09:28
Finally.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Game and Watch Forever on 02 Jul 2013, 09:51
And they fit neatly inside a single pun jar? This is sounding like an episode of the IT Crowd....
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 02 Jul 2013, 10:20
The only reason for this gag is to embarrass Marten, which it seems to be succeeding in doing.  I see absolutely no likelihood of it happening.

The usual  purpose of a gag would be to keep Jim from alarming the neighbors with his reactions.

It does make sense as a shiptease as well as a joke at Marten's expense. They seemed pretty deadpan to me if it was a joke.

The Microsoft Dalek rolls around shouting "EM-BRACE! EX-TEND! EX-TERMI-I-NATE!".
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Masterpiece on 02 Jul 2013, 10:38
An Internet weighs about as much as a strawberry.

Not a valid youtube URL
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 02 Jul 2013, 12:05
Also, if Marten is sick of being the straight man, I hear Steve can help him with that:

(http://www.questionablecontent.net/random/1386alternate.png)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 02 Jul 2013, 12:27
I still have a version of Steve's face in the bottom panel with the snowflakes GIMP'd away on my harddrive as an alternative avatar from when I discovered this one…




Here it is: (http://i.imgur.com/98HaWdT.png)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 02 Jul 2013, 12:30
An Internet weighs about as much as a strawberry.

Not a valid youtube URL

Eh, all the DATA in the internet weighs about as much as a strawberry, but the internet would be nothing without millions of miles of infrastructure.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 02 Jul 2013, 13:06
Yeah, those tubes are pretty heavy.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 02 Jul 2013, 13:12
And all the cats in them of course…
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 02 Jul 2013, 15:08
I would have thought the little trucks would have been the greater mass component…
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 02 Jul 2013, 16:40
(http://i2.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/019/369/loltubes.jpg)

 :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TheEvilDog on 02 Jul 2013, 19:01
Of course, this way Marten gets to call Jim "Dad III; Vengeance"

I think you mean "Dad III: Parenting with a Vengeance!"
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Rghfrgl on 02 Jul 2013, 19:32
Dad III: The Daddying.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TheEvilDog on 02 Jul 2013, 20:19
Unless its "The Stepfather" and then it becomes a whole different kind of horror.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 03 Jul 2013, 00:09
The Emilyverse seems to be a happy place to live.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: muon on 03 Jul 2013, 00:37
OMG!! All the embarrassment!

Isn't it usually Claire's role to be unusually blunt?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 03 Jul 2013, 01:11
Nice save, Marten. Way to depth charge the save, Emily.

I recommend Martily and Emilen.

(I am not. I lift the tipped pun jar, and put in 3 internets)
But... but I already replaced it with a pun box. I gave it a lid and everything!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Jazzmaster on 03 Jul 2013, 01:18
Poor Maarten, I feel your awkward
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: gopher on 03 Jul 2013, 01:33
Comments like that could be job-endingly bad for Tai if Claire complains.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 03 Jul 2013, 01:33
Claire is blunt about professional issues but seems to have some anxiety about interpersonal interactions.

EDIT: or if Emily complains, after someone explains it to her.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mtmerrick on 03 Jul 2013, 02:22
Emily you cannot possibly be THAT oblivious.  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Alerie Sand on 03 Jul 2013, 02:39
Oh, Emily  :laugh:

Now that it's mentioned I wouldn't mind seeing something happen for Marten in the love interest area... It's cute when he has a crush.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TinPenguin on 03 Jul 2013, 03:24
Comments like that could be job-endingly bad for Tai if Claire complains.

... why would Claire complain, when she is too busy stifling her laughter?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TimO on 03 Jul 2013, 03:25
Subtle Tai, really subtle! :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 03 Jul 2013, 04:46
I had a similar reaction to Claire by the last panel (less the blushing). 

That was an excellent way to prepare to start into a day of legal work....
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Throg on 03 Jul 2013, 04:55
C'mon Marten, don't be so stiff!

Besides, Emily looks like she'd know what she was doing if she went camping. I'm sure she could help you handle your wood.

...

that's all for today.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 03 Jul 2013, 04:59
Trust me, it's more than enough. 

_____________________________



I am reminded of the Angus / Marigold / Hanners comic with "Don't break the spell!" 


I have to go sell beer now, or I'd archive it myself.  Have fun!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 03 Jul 2013, 05:06
Emily you cannot possibly be THAT oblivious.  :psyduck:

We know Emily's a cloud cuckoolander. We know she's so oblivious that she's aware of anime tropes and such, yet doesn't know what anime is.

Also, time to overanalyze panel #3. Is Claire taken aback by Tai propositioning one of her employees for another employee, or is Claire taken aback by Marten being one of those employees?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 03 Jul 2013, 05:09
Can't it be both? 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: arkady on 03 Jul 2013, 05:23
Number 2482 reminds me of a really similar story.

I'd been over to a friend's house for drinks. There was a group of about six of us and several wanted to go to the local nightclub.

Nightclubs aren't really my thing, but spending time with friends is, so I went. Me and the other person who wasn't really a nightclub person got some drinks and sat in a quiet-ish corner chatting and keeping an eye on coats while the other four went dancing / "on the pull".

One of our number, we found out, gets quite creepy around women when he's drunk. We watched him try talking to someone, amusing ourselves as we watched her body language get more and more defensive until it got to the point that her friends rescued her or we went over to distract him while she escaped. (He is actually really quite sexist and in total denial about it - I honestly don't know who invites him to these things or why.)

After a bit of this he decided that he "hasn't got [his] mojo on" today, and decided to be my wingman.

I tried to explain that I wasn't interested in random pickups in clubs. He went away.

Three minutes later he turned up almost dragging a blonde woman behind him.

"This is Arkady," he says, "have you met him? Would you, yes or no?"

I like to think she was laughing at him and not me.

At least Tai is far less skeezy.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Neko_Ali on 03 Jul 2013, 05:27
Wow.. that's such a classy pick up line....
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 03 Jul 2013, 05:33
Also, Marten's camping comment suddenly reminded me of this horribly rapey bash.org quote: http://bash.org/?1730
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jmucchiello on 03 Jul 2013, 05:37
Comments like that could be job-endingly bad for Tai if Claire complains.
Given the comic's title today, don't you mean "if Claire dies"?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Black Sword on 03 Jul 2013, 06:29
*cracks up, dies laughing*
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Thrudd on 03 Jul 2013, 06:55
*spends time sniggering while cleaning keyboard* At least its washable. Poor coffee, I barely sipped thee.

It is at moments like these I have to wonder if Emily is really really all that she comes across as or does she have that touch of madness/genius and is playing the part really well?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 03 Jul 2013, 09:03
Emily you cannot possibly be THAT oblivious.  :psyduck:

We know Emily's a cloud cuckoolander. We know she's so oblivious that she's aware of anime tropes and such, yet doesn't know what anime is.

Also, time to overanalyze panel #3. Is Claire taken aback by Tai propositioning one of her employees for another employee, or is Claire taken aback by Marten being one of those employees?
Never underestimate a character trait that exists for the sake of comedy like Emilys obliviousness.

As to panel 3, I surmise that she's taken aback either because asking Emily is asking for trouble or she was hoping she'd be the target of the attempted hook up.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 03 Jul 2013, 09:09
Damn, something's definitely wrong with the hosting of this comic. It took me now ten hours to read today's comic and enter the forum. I was able to open the forum for a short time in between, but only the main page, I couldn't load any of the subforums. I sincerely hope that this post will come through…

Pings and TCP connections time out all the time, on both domains, questionablecontent.net and forums.questionablecontent.net. I'm surprised nobody seems to have these problems, as the problem occured device and ISP independent here. Not even webproxies or VPN helped…

But when I was finally able to read the comic I burst out in laughter.

Also I'm surprised nobody has pointed Claire's shocked expression in reply of Tai's question. I thought that would be a great deal for all the Claire/Marten shippers. But I doubt that it means anything like that. I would have the same expression in her place…
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Aquaisces on 03 Jul 2013, 09:11
Claire's disappointed/apprehensive look in panel 2 made me wonder. How did she feel about Tai singling out Emily instead of her? Was it even a thought at all?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 03 Jul 2013, 09:12
Shipper here, Claire's nervous/shocked facial expression was one of the first things I noticed. Perhaps someone was worried she was about to be set up? XD

Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: celticgeek on 03 Jul 2013, 09:13
I occasionally have trouble reaching both the comic and the forum.  It usually only lasts a few minutes, although it has lasted as long as half an hour, or so. 

Today was one of the half an hour problems.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 03 Jul 2013, 09:14
Also I'm surprised nobody has pointed Claire's shocked expression in reply of Tai's question. I thought that would be a great deal for all the Claire/Marten shippers. But I doubt that it means anything like that. I would have the same expression in her place…
Sometimes that warning message is actually pertinent. Look one post up.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 03 Jul 2013, 09:15
Damn, something's definitely wrong with the hosting of this comic. It took me now ten hours to read today's comic and enter the forum.

The CloudFlare caching service that the comic (and forum, as it's on the same server) uses has had problems at multiple nodes of its infrastructure today.  There were two hours when I couldn't connect at all.  Their status page (https://www.cloudflare.com/system-status) still shows service degradation at a number of their nodes, including Frankfurt.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 03 Jul 2013, 09:17
And I had problems earlier, as well.

And I also pointed out panel 3 earlier. :P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Masterpiece on 03 Jul 2013, 09:38
Damn, something's definitely wrong with the hosting of this comic. It took me now ten hours to read today's comic and enter the forum. I was able to open the forum for a short time in between, but only the main page, I couldn't load any of the subforums. I sincerely hope that this post will come through…

Pings and TCP connections time out all the time, on both domains, questionablecontent.net and forums.questionablecontent.net. I'm surprised nobody seems to have these problems, as the problem occured device and ISP independent here. Not even webproxies or VPN helped…

I've had the exact same problems...

The CloudFlare caching service that the comic (and forum, as it's on the same server) uses has had problems at multiple nodes of its infrastructure today.  There were two hours when I couldn't connect at all.  Their status page (https://www.cloudflare.com/system-status) still shows service degradation at a number of their nodes, including Frankfurt.

...but suspected correctly that it was just CloudFlare acting up. Was kinda annoying though! I was occasionally able to read your comments here and was aching to find more (confessed shipper here. Hi, GM!)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 03 Jul 2013, 09:44
I totally oversaw that… Sorry.

So I wasn't the only one who had trouble with accessing from Germany today. When they know that this problem exists, why don't they resolve the domain to one of their working servers? The first ping I sent today was fine, but the following ones (which were sent to a different IP) all timed out. Entering the first IP in a browser resulted in a Cloudflare message that told me that direct IP connections are forbidden. This just confirms my opinion about services like this. I do not have much experience with this, but I think a well configured iptables should work against small DDoS attacks just as well as a caching service. Big DDoS attacks, well, they could just as well crash the caching service.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 03 Jul 2013, 10:30
CloudFlare is also a hedge against IPv4 exhaustion - they actually care what hostname you access the site under, to determine how to route the traffic, using fewer IPs. In other words, with CloudFlare, the hostname is actually critical.

(And, FWIW, my problems were from Newark, OH, USA.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 03 Jul 2013, 10:42
Newark was the epicentre of their problems, I understand.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mlle Germain on 03 Jul 2013, 10:56
So I wasn't the only one who had trouble with accessing from Germany today.

I also couldn't access the site the whole (German) day. Is this a problem specific to Germany? I checked on isitdownrightnow.com a few times which said everything was fine, but according to the comments, a few people still had the same problem. Somebody wrote it had something to do with a change of IP adress for the site. Apparently the problem could be resolved by using a different DNS server (I actually do not know much about this stuff, so I didn't change my DNS server...).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: KOK on 03 Jul 2013, 11:21
I have had no problem accessing comic and forum several times throughout the day from two locations in Denmark.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 03 Jul 2013, 11:33
Is this a problem specific to Germany?

They have caching node sites in many countries.  The status link in my previous message shows problems at several US nodes, Frankfurt, and Hong Kong.  But they had routing problems in Newark which prevented some data getting through to nodes which were in themselves working - so that although London is shown as having no problems today, I did in fact have problems this morning.  Testing sites like isitdownrightnow.com often test at several places as well, so may get a different answer from your own experience.

They strike me as a not terribly reliable service; but the service level that is being used for QC is free, so maybe paid users get priority in fixes or workarounds.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: judemorrigan on 03 Jul 2013, 13:13
While I couldn't access the comic this morning, it was easy enough to find on tumblr.  That seems to be a handy backup approach.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 03 Jul 2013, 13:17
Are we all pretending to not get the Emster's (perhaps) unwitting innuendo? If so, I'll play along.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bryntheskits on 03 Jul 2013, 13:37
Hahahahahhahaha oh my god Emily you make everything better

Also I'm surprised nobody has pointed Claire's shocked expression in reply of Tai's question. I thought that would be a great deal for all the Claire/Marten shippers.
I am a shipper but I doubt it happening so I no longer hope it happens.

Haha just kidding please happen.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 03 Jul 2013, 14:15
Newark was the epicentre of their problems, I understand.
Different Newark, I suspect - not the one in Ohio. ;)

Not the first time this one has been confused for the one in New Jersey.

Newark, New Jersey: Part of the New York City metropolitan area (so a lot of stuff that needs to be near NYC, but needs to be cheaper, goes there).
Newark, Ohio: Hick "city" near Columbus, OH, its claim to fame is some hick attaching a lawnmower engine to a bar stool, getting drunk, driving it, and crashing it. Oh, and some glass factory.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 03 Jul 2013, 14:45
Quote
cat in a tube
I don't think this implementation of the protocol allows for an easy three-way-handshake. :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 03 Jul 2013, 15:07
Yay! I can has forum! I was able briefly to see the comic last night, but not get here. Excellent drawing of Claire, but Emily's a bit two dimensional...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 03 Jul 2013, 15:08
If Emily had picked up her ancestral culture it would be plausible that she deliberately misunderstood in order to avoid a confrontation and then adroitly picked a double-entendre to flirt but have plausible deniability about it.

Not for an instant do I think that's what happened.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bryntheskits on 03 Jul 2013, 15:11
Was about to say you were giving Emily a crapload of credit there haha
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Boxilar on 03 Jul 2013, 15:26
Emily you cannot possibly be THAT oblivious.  :psyduck:
De-lurking to note the same question was asked repeatedly about Padma.
(She wasn't, really.)

And we saw how that turned out.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 03 Jul 2013, 15:30
And Raven.
Speaking of which, I still root for a meeting of Emily and Raven to happen.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 03 Jul 2013, 15:41
But which is more frightening

The thought that Emily is that oblivious, or that she gets it and acts that oblivious.


And was Claire having a wishful thinking moment there?!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Boxilar on 03 Jul 2013, 16:17
But which is more frightening

The thought that Emily is that oblivious, or that she gets it and acts that oblivious.


And was Claire having a wishful thinking moment there?!
I think that if Emily does get it, she's covering for the fact that she is extremely socially awkward. People are more likely to forgive social gaffes if they think you're five beers short of a six pack than if they think you're on top of things and are offensive unintentionally.

I think Claire is just trying to keep from exploding into loud, raucous laughter in a library environment.

Or she's having an aneurysm.

Whichever.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 03 Jul 2013, 16:27
Looking at today's comic, and the one that Jeph linked to on Twitter (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2320), I wonder if he isn't setting up a rivalry between Emily and Claire...

... or is that a bit too shippy?  :-P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Zebediah on 03 Jul 2013, 16:36
I'm beginning to think that Emily must have been an Irish setter in a previous life, because as dogs go Irish setters are the happiest, friendliest and most extraordinarily goofy of all.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 03 Jul 2013, 16:53
Newark, New Jersey: Part of the New York City metropolitan area (so a lot of stuff that needs to be near NYC, but needs to be cheaper, goes there).
I grew up 15 minutes from there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 03 Jul 2013, 18:06
Where would you want to work in the QCverse?

Coffee of Doom    4 (4.7%)
Library    11 (12.9%)
The Secret Bakery    4 (4.7%)
At Hannermoms corporate hq    4 (4.7%)
On Hannerdads space station    39 (45.9%) <== By a LARGE margin
As Svens assistant    2 (2.4%)
For Marigolds dad    0 (0%)
The pizza place that employ(ed) Penny* and Dale    0 (0%)
The bookstore that employed Penny    2 (2.4%)
The Horrible Revelation bar with Wil    7 (8.2%)
The other bar    0 (0%)
Martens old work    2 (2.4%)
The Irony cafe    0 (0%)
That place in the mall with the chassis    6 (7.1%) <== "Idoru" is the name of the store, BTW.
The roomba factory    2 (2.4%)
The LANpark    1 (1.2%)
Someplace else not mentioned.    1 (1.2%)

Total Members Voted: 85

* - "Allegedly" Penny worked at a pizza place, under her "alter ego" of Pizza Girl. This has not yet been proven.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Storel on 03 Jul 2013, 18:07
I'm beginning to think that Emily must have been an Irish setter in a previous life, because as dogs go Irish setters are the happiest, friendliest and most extraordinarily goofy of all.

I really think you've got something there.  :-D

As for Claire's expressions, I honestly believe that Claire has no interest in being anything to Marten but his friend. Otherwise, she wouldn't have been so mortified by the cuddling incident, worrying that Marten might think she was interested in him because of it.

So here's my take on her expressions by panel:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 03 Jul 2013, 18:40
If Emily had picked up her ancestral culture it would be plausible that she deliberately misunderstood in order to avoid a confrontation and then adroitly picked a double-entendre to flirt but have plausible deniability about it.

Not for an instant do I think that's what happened.

That would be... hmmmm.... maybe she just wants us to think she's totally out of it, but is in fact in complete control of the situation, picking and choosing her words and behaviors to maximize her personal amusement and the confusion of others. Which would in fact make her the God Queen of Troll Kind.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: RedWolf4 on 03 Jul 2013, 19:27
I just read the comic, and now my ribs need a transplant.

Also, the idea that Emily is some sort of troll evil mastermind is. . . scarily possible. And awesome.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 03 Jul 2013, 19:41
I tend to think she's one of those child geniuses, finishing college at 12 and starting to study Library Science. 


A very tall 12. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Rghfrgl on 03 Jul 2013, 19:51
As for Claire's expressions, I honestly believe that Claire has no interest in being anything to Marten but his friend. Otherwise, she wouldn't have been so mortified by the cuddling incident, worrying that Marten might think she was interested in him because of it.

That could have been taken many ways. She could very well not like him. Could like him but not want to let on. Could like him, but still not want to send a signal she didn't send herself. Or the obvious, regardless of liking him, was afraid he'd be freaked out by the trans thing.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: willpell on 03 Jul 2013, 21:40
Well at least the infinite hot dogs aren't going into his cloaca....
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Skewbrow on 03 Jul 2013, 22:38
... or coming out of his cloaca

Happy Fourth of July to US forumites!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 03 Jul 2013, 22:57
Cloaca is a humorous word.

And now, my traditional July 4th post:

"Good morning. Good morning. In less than an hour, aircraft from here will join others from around the world, and you will be launching the largest aerial battle in the history of mankind. Mankind, that word should have new meaning for all of us today. We can't be consumed by our petty differences any more. We will be united in our common interest. Perhaps it's fate that today is the 4th of July, and you will once again be fighting for our freedom. Not from tyranny, oppression, or persecution, but from annihilation. We're fighting for our right to live, to exist�and should we win the day, the 4th of July will no longer be known as an American holiday, but as the day when the world declared in one voice, 'We will not go quietly into the night! We will not vanish without a fight! We're going to live on, we're going to survive.' Today we celebrate our independence day!"

President Thomas Whitmore
July 4th, 1996
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ThinksTooMuch on 03 Jul 2013, 23:12
Independence Day was such a brilliant film.  It was also a product of it's time.  This may be nostalgia speaking, I mean I saw that movie for the first time somewhere around age 9... but I am having a hard time coming up with a speech even half as memorable in any movie within the last decade-plus.

Oh, comic... Emily's response to Marten yesterday had me in stitches.  And since Barbecue is on the menu today, I will be keeping Jeph's advice in mind!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 03 Jul 2013, 23:33
... or coming out of his cloaca

Happy Fourth of July to US forumites!

Mass is conserved, and Yelling Bird isn't getting any bigger, so they must be going somewhere.

The origin of hot dogs is something best not thought about.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: J on 04 Jul 2013, 01:06
happy freedom day!

Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TinPenguin on 04 Jul 2013, 01:55
Happy Crusader-Slaughtering Day.

1187 Never Forget.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Nepiophage on 04 Jul 2013, 04:21
Quote

Mass is conserved, and Yelling Bird isn't getting any bigger, so they must be going somewhere.

No laws apply in Yelling Bird's universe. He would be in jail if they did.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 04 Jul 2013, 04:26
That would be... hmmmm.... maybe she just wants us to think she's totally out of it, but is in fact in complete control of the situation, picking and choosing her words and behaviors to maximize her personal amusement and the confusion of others. Which would in fact make her the God Queen of Troll Kind.

Nah - Emily doesn't turn to stone when in contact with sunlight, therefore not a troll.

(Well, at least the north European type.  She seems smarter than a Warhammer Fantasy type as well.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 04 Jul 2013, 05:15
We're talking the sub species Trollicus 4chanicus here Borde.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Emoroffle on 04 Jul 2013, 05:32
I wonder if the QC-verse has advanced enough technology that I could buy one of the chassis for myself? With my nice employee discount of course.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 04 Jul 2013, 05:42
We're talking the sub species Trollicus 4chanicus here Borde.

As I understand it that subspecies is also susceptible to sunlight as well, which is why they are most often found in basements.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 04 Jul 2013, 08:21
But that's not because they turn to stone; it's more a case of extreme photosensitivity due to their troglodytic habits. Some of them have, however, learned that much of this can be mitigated by the use of long dark clothes, hats, and sunglasses.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 04 Jul 2013, 15:19
Cloaca is a humorous word.

And now, my traditional July 4th post:

"Good morning. Good morning. In less than an hour, aircraft from here will join others from around the world, and you will be launching the largest aerial battle in the history of mankind. Mankind, that word should have new meaning for all of us today. We can't be consumed by our petty differences any more. We will be united in our common interest. Perhaps it's fate that today is the 4th of July, and you will once again be fighting for our freedom. Not from tyranny, oppression, or persecution, but from annihilation. We're fighting for our right to live, to exist�and should we win the day, the 4th of July will no longer be known as an American holiday, but as the day when the world declared in one voice, 'We will not go quietly into the night! We will not vanish without a fight! We're going to live on, we're going to survive.' Today we celebrate our independence day!"

President Thomas Whitmore
July 4th, 1996

Good speech, but it's Pullmans delivery that sells it. (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3gFN1t7Goyk)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 04 Jul 2013, 23:35
(facepalm)

Comic linky brokey.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 04 Jul 2013, 23:36
Well Veronica? Are you feeling lucky? Eh? Eh?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 04 Jul 2013, 23:39
EDIT: Had to wait for it to propagate. All better now.

Hmmm.... I think I can help the Google SEO count... :D

(HINT: try going here (http://questionablecontent.wikia.com/wiki/Jim) ;) )
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 04 Jul 2013, 23:42
I think it must be something to do with the caching service - since it was introduced I regularly find that the comic doesn't appear for a little while after being updated.  Sometimes following the links for Previous and Next gets it to show.

That said, I can see today's just fine, and it's something I said I reckoned wouldn't happen...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 04 Jul 2013, 23:51
The first hit in the actual Google search... is the Secret Bakery entry in the QC Wikia page. :)

(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: St.Clair on 04 Jul 2013, 23:57
Desperation, thy name is Veronica.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Jul 2013, 00:03
This feels contrived. So what if she's not interested in anyone from the scene. They have friends. Friends of friends are a traditional resource. Better than crossing the country to meet someone who prefers younger women.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: gopher on 05 Jul 2013, 01:01
On the bright side Veronica seems to be looking a lot younger these days. Clearly toyboys are good for the skin.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Indicible on 05 Jul 2013, 01:24
Glad to see I'm not the only one who made the search...
There is indeed a surprising number of bakeries in Northampton.
As for meeting people in the scene, why do I suddenly have a vision of Ally and Lisa playing matchmaker (Sunstone reference, for those wondering, excellent webcomic on BDSM... and love. Now, that sounds cheesy...).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mlle Germain on 05 Jul 2013, 02:02
Does this seem like Jeph is actually going for the Jim-Veronica thing? I know that it has been suggested here already after Jim's and Dora's date, but I really wouldn't have expected to see it in the comic. Although apart from them living at different ends of the continent, I can actually imagine them as a couple quite well by now.
Or maybe it's just a pre-weekend gag and next week we'll have something completely different. Ah well, we'll see.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 05 Jul 2013, 02:07
This feels contrived.
Yes, I regret to say, it does.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Emoroffle on 05 Jul 2013, 02:25
Contrived or no I still want to see where it goes. She needs some lovins too.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Jul 2013, 04:05
No less contrived than how Marten followed Vicki cross-country. Or the whole Padma thing, which at the time seemed contrived, too.

I have my doubts this will go far, but it'll be fun to watch the train wreck story line.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Skaltura on 05 Jul 2013, 04:07
Ms. Vance permanently joining the cast in Northampton, MA would be the funniest thing ever. :-D

A never-ending shitstorm of embarrassment and humiliation for Marten without a doubt, but still funny as hell. :evil:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Nepiophage on 05 Jul 2013, 04:41
The first hit in the actual Google search... is the Secret Bakery entry in the QC Wikia page. :)
But the picture of Jim isn't the least bit cute . .
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 05 Jul 2013, 05:57
Ms. Vance permanently joining the cast in Northampton, MA would be the funniest thing ever. :-D

A never-ending shitstorm of embarrassment and humiliation for Marten without a doubt, but still funny as hell. :evil:
You and me have a different definition of funny. I shall be awaiting you at midday before the saloon doors.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: RedWolf4 on 05 Jul 2013, 06:27
*Starts measuring Loki and Skal* Do you prefer pine or oak?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Nighthawk700 on 05 Jul 2013, 07:04
I think Jeph is doing a great job of poking at the shippers.  ;-) 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 05 Jul 2013, 07:12
Yes, he is…


All aboard the "Marten/Emily"!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 05 Jul 2013, 07:21
The only slightly sensible ship name that I can find is 'Emten', pronounced 'A414'.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 05 Jul 2013, 07:30
I know people like to tease by pushing the boundaries, often because they think things can be boring otherwise; but let me remind you:

Shipping.  Well, if a pairing is realistic for the characters as written, and in the situation they are in, then it may well be reasonable to discuss.  But the use of any portmanteau to describe a pairing is a big, big warning sign that offensive trivialisation is in play.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DrBear on 05 Jul 2013, 07:35
I also think it might be Jeph pulling a "Steve eats breakfast" joke on us...

but hey, if you were in Veronica's situation, wouldn't you fire up The Google just to see what you'd find?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 05 Jul 2013, 07:42
I'd be curious as to what was making more than one person think of pairing us up more than just what he looked like. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Y on 05 Jul 2013, 07:43
It seems Jeph is still logged in on google plus seeing we can see ph as last letters of the username.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mlle Germain on 05 Jul 2013, 07:53
I think Jeph is doing a great job of poking at the shippers.  ;-)


I agree that it probably is a jab at the probably numerous people suggesting this to him. I am actually not very interested in this storyline and I sort of wish we had an actual story instead of just this kind of poke, if that's what it is. And if it's serious I agree that it is a very constructed sort of development. Although my brain tried to make it work in accordance with how the comic seems/seemed to be going this morning, hence my comment above, which  I did not intend to be shipping. I hope it has not been seen as violating any rules. If so, I apologise.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Jul 2013, 08:01
It seems Jeph is still logged in on google plus seeing we can see ph as last letters of the username.

Nice catch. That should go in the "Did you notice?" Thread.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 05 Jul 2013, 08:08
My post was only a somewhat contrived road name joke, though if the mod-post was directed at me then I apologise and shall not do it again.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 05 Jul 2013, 08:12
Yes, he is…
All aboard the "Marten/Emily"!

Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: pwhodges on 05 Jul 2013, 08:50
Don't worry.  No lines have been crossed; but each approach can make it easier for someone else to go too far, is all.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: DSL on 05 Jul 2013, 09:12
Besides, once VV sees the soul patch it'll be all over for that ship.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 05 Jul 2013, 09:33
I actually had a really bad shipmanteau joke, involving the song Row, Row, Row Your Boat (even though the pronunciation would be simply wrong), saved up. Decided against it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 05 Jul 2013, 10:36
I'd be curious as to what was making more than one person think of pairing us up more than just what he looked like.

This happen to you often? 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Storel on 05 Jul 2013, 11:09
I think Jeph is doing a great job of poking at the shippers.  ;-)

Yeah, this definitely feels like trolling the 'shippers to me. Nicely done, too.  8-) I don't see Veronica changing her mind no matter what she finds in that search.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Zebediah on 05 Jul 2013, 11:17
Just playing devil's advocate here: Veronica is in "Oh God I'm so lonely!" territory, which can lead people to do highly irrational things.

She also seems self-aware enough that she wouldn't make a life-changing decision while in that territory. She may daydream, but that's all.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 05 Jul 2013, 11:18
She (and Henry for that matter) do have a tendency to visit Marten with little-to-no notice.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Jul 2013, 14:52
In general they're not into advance planning (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1513).
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Nepiophage on 05 Jul 2013, 14:55
On the bright side Veronica seems to be looking a lot younger these days. Clearly toyboys are good for the skin.
Every time Veronica appears, she looks younger. Check out
432 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=432) - first appearance
1820 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1820) - after The Breakup
2409 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2409) - At the wedding
2484 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2484) - today

Whatever she's taking, I want some.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 05 Jul 2013, 15:00
I partially disagree, I think she looks significantly older in 1820 than she does in 432, which makes it all the more jarring at the wedding that she looks even younger than she does in 432.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 05 Jul 2013, 15:12
Well... VV could have had a little "work" done, it might even be a tax-deductible expense.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Masterpiece on 05 Jul 2013, 15:22
Are we really calling her VV now? Her legal name is still Veronica Reed after all.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 05 Jul 2013, 15:28
Considering she's divorced, wouldn't she go back to using her original name? And has her original name ever been mentioned in the comic?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ElvisRevenge on 05 Jul 2013, 15:44
I'm glad I'm not the only one who thinks Marten's mom without makeup looks FOOOOOOINE!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 05 Jul 2013, 16:13
I'd be curious as to what was making more than one person think of pairing us up more than just what he looked like.

This happen to you often?

Getting paired up, or really bad sentence structure? 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 05 Jul 2013, 16:17
… both?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 05 Jul 2013, 16:24
Bad sentence structure is a constant hazard. 

I'm short, bald, overweight and over 50.  No, don't get paired up a lot.   :-P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 05 Jul 2013, 16:27
I think we're seeing the evolution of Jeph's art here, and not any kind of intentional change in appearance.

In the 400s, the differences in characters were pretty subtle. I think Veronica looks youngest in that series, if only because her appearance isn't that different from much younger girls and she almost looks like just a slightly larger Dora (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=437).

The 1800s show a pretty big difference between the beginning and end. When she appears in 1820 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1820) the lines defining her cheeks and eye lines are pretty dark, making her look much older than in the 400s... so much so that I was trying to figure out who she was. By 1829 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1829)-30 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1830)-31 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=1831) those lines have significantly lightened and are much more subtle. Were I guessing I'd say Jeph was figuring out how to draw her in the updated style and made some adjustments along the way to dial her in a little better.

At the wedding, for me, anyway, the glasses really dominated her features. The cheek lines are now gone, eye lines remain and are more shading differences than actual lines. You could convince me that perhaps she had some work done in between to soften those cheek lines but I think it's just as likely a drawing style update.

So take her glasses off and return her to her home setting in relaxed mode and you get the hotness that is 2484 (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2484). When I get a chance to watch the stream (which I highly recommend... watch Jeph's twitter each night for details and a link to the stream) I'm frequently astonished how much difference the glasses make. He draws the faces first, then adds the glasses later.

If I get some time I might put together one of those side-by-side-by-side multi-frame pictures of Veronica's appearances (if no one beats me to it, hint hint)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 05 Jul 2013, 17:05
Now who says she ain't interested  :D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: jwhouk on 05 Jul 2013, 18:14
Jeph's art around the time of Dora in her blonde hair was hit or miss at times. It wasn't until about right around the breakup that the art got noticeably better.

And I'm all for VV as a moniker, and I would probably agree that she's been having some "work" done. That could very well be why she's seated in her robe, after all...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Throg on 05 Jul 2013, 18:55
Yeah--Jeph's art has improved so steadily and so incrementally that it's hard to make judgements about whether a character has "gotten work done" as opposed to Jeph has a better handle on facial structure or likes this style over that style.

And what harm in a little Googlestalking? There's a big leap to looking up people's pics online and actually making a call, let alone meeting for coffee. 

I dunno, if Marten's mom ends up coming over to date, er, her son's-ex's-one-time-date, that's getting close to sharkjumping.

Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Jul 2013, 19:06
If we're talking about business expenses, we're talking about her business, and her professional name is Veronica Vance.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 05 Jul 2013, 19:13
Does anyone call John Wayne by anything other than his professional name? If not, I'm cool with VV.

she almost looks like just a slightly larger Dora (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=437).
This occurred to me too. A little "work", a few work-outs, and a good hairdresser...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Boxilar on 05 Jul 2013, 20:02
I know some folks say the possible Veronica /Jim romance seems contrived. I respectfully disagree.

Veronica admitted to Marten back right after the breakup that she was lousy at relationships.

We know Mrs. Reed is more than capable from a sexual standpoint. She works as a professional dominatrix and can pick up men less than half her age for one night stands. Her problem is that she has no idea how to be in a healthy long term relationship, and at 57 is terrified of being alone. She is a beautiful attractive woman who has remained a "player" well into he fifties, but wether her fears are founded or not, she thinks she's running out of time to find someone to share her life with. She admitted at the wedding that she had no idea how to have a normal relationship  and that everyone  she knew was into the "scene".

I think that she's  so afraid of being rejected if she goes out and tries it on her own that she's paralyzed and won't act on her own.

Enter her son, calling about a possible prospect. Suddenly, she's  not on her own. Marten  has suggested someone for her to date, even if it was in a dismissive way. Veronica can feel safe trying to date Jim because it wasn't entirely her idea. If it all goes pear shaped, Marten is partially to blame, even if only  a little.

That frees her up to try, where before, she couldn't for fear of a failure that would have been all her fault.
Mind  this not a concious thought process on her part. But I think it explains why out of the myriad of possibilities she has, she's  going to fly back to Northampton and attempt to romance a man mentioned in a casual conversation with her son.

My $.02.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mustang6172 on 05 Jul 2013, 20:05
It'll all go wrong when she decides she does not wish to be a stepmother.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Boxilar on 05 Jul 2013, 20:16
It'll all go wrong when she decides she does not wish to be a stepmother.

That, or she simply doesn't understand the basic give and take of a good relationship. She is a dominant personality.

The problem she will run into, even with her one night stands will be if her would be conquests get even a wiff of desperation from her. What makes her attractive, beyond her physical beauty, is het aura of self confidence. A hint that she is not as confident as she seemed will undermine that.

Also, what could sabotage a relationship with Jim would be a refusal to let her defenses down, to be at least a little vulnerable.

But I'm getting ahead of myself. This may amount to nothing. I am interested to see it play out, one way or the other.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 05 Jul 2013, 21:35
She seems to have been OK with being a parent, though that doesn't mean she'd want to do it again. In fact, it's notable that Marten is an only child.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mtmerrick on 05 Jul 2013, 22:15
I have a feeling that's more due to Maurice :P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 05 Jul 2013, 22:17
Sam's well past the age where she'd need/desire an extra parent in the full sense of the term most likely. So I don't think that's really a consideration. I have no doubt that Sam would appreciate another woman around besides our favorite staff of sassy baristas to get life advice from, and Veronica certainly isn't shy about giving advice when asked, but it wouldn't be "parenting" in the involved sense of raising your offspring for 18 or so years.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mary tyler murder on 05 Jul 2013, 22:24
it really is gonna be a 'martin's supposed friends and his mom ignore his feelings and shit all over him' arc, barf
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Nepiophage on 05 Jul 2013, 23:03
 Which all reminds me of a very old and very terrible joke:

Q. How does Veronica keep her youth?


(click to show/hide)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 06 Jul 2013, 00:10
I'm trying to imagine what it would be like for a rebellious teen to rebel against Ms. Reed.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 06 Jul 2013, 02:59
It'll all go wrong when she decides she does not wish to be a stepmother.

That, or she simply doesn't understand the basic give and take of a good relationship. She is a dominant personality.

The problem she will run into, even with her one night stands will be if her would be conquests get even a wiff of desperation from her. What makes her attractive, beyond her physical beauty, is het aura of self confidence. A hint that she is not as confident as she seemed will undermine that.

Also, what could sabotage a relationship with Jim would be a refusal to let her defenses down, to be at least a little vulnerable.

But I'm getting ahead of myself. This may amount to nothing. I am interested to see it play out, one way or the other.

I was actually very much against the relationship happening, but now you made me want it to appear in the comic.
I'm trying to imagine what it would be like for a rebellious teen to rebel against Ms. Reed.

...and that too :D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 06 Jul 2013, 05:37
I just realised how great the bottom panel of 2482 (http://questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2482) is as new panel for the QC Captions thread… If you put it out of context and blank the speech bubbles the panel gets a whole new meaning…
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Kugai on 06 Jul 2013, 10:56
I'm trying to imagine what it would be like for a rebellious teen to rebel against Ms. Reed.


But what if Sam winds up being her apprentice?   :-D
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Sorflakne on 06 Jul 2013, 12:22
Ms. Reed is looking good.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 06 Jul 2013, 14:05
Hmm. I'm really not interested in the comic taking the suggested turn, mostly because I don't like one of the two characters involved.

Sorry I didn't make a second poll by the way, the second half of my week was rather busy. A new thread will be up tonight, because I'll be on the road tomorrow.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Storel on 06 Jul 2013, 15:01
Which all reminds me of a very old and very terrible joke:

Q. How does Veronica keep her youth?


(click to show/hide)

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9CdVTCDdEwI

 :-D Every old joke is new to someone, and that one was new to me.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 06 Jul 2013, 15:52
I know some folks say the possible Veronica /Jim romance seems contrived. I respectfully disagree.

Veronica admitted to Marten back right after the breakup that she was lousy at relationships.

We know Mrs. Reed is more than capable from a sexual standpoint. She works as a professional dominatrix and can pick up men less than half her age for one night stands. Her problem is that she has no idea how to be in a healthy long term relationship, and at 57 is terrified of being alone. She is a beautiful attractive woman who has remained a "player" well into he fifties, but wether her fears are founded or not, she thinks she's running out of time to find someone to share her life with. She admitted at the wedding that she had no idea how to have a normal relationship  and that everyone  she knew was into the "scene".

I think that she's  so afraid of being rejected if she goes out and tries it on her own that she's paralyzed and won't act on her own.

Enter her son, calling about a possible prospect. Suddenly, she's  not on her own. Marten  has suggested someone for her to date, even if it was in a dismissive way. Veronica can feel safe trying to date Jim because it wasn't entirely her idea. If it all goes pear shaped, Marten is partially to blame, even if only  a little.

That frees her up to try, where before, she couldn't for fear of a failure that would have been all her fault.
Mind  this not a concious thought process on her part. But I think it explains why out of the myriad of possibilities she has, she's  going to fly back to Northampton and attempt to romance a man mentioned in a casual conversation with her son.

My $.02.

Very well said, so much so that I'm quoting the whole thing for effect.

I'd just add that the "I'm so lonely" breakdown in the bar at the wedding shows us that there are some serious chunks in her armor. She might simply not be as experienced at non-professional relationships as we might think, notwithstanding the fact that she has an adult child.

Also FWIW, I think VV exploring "vanilla dating" would be an interesting parallel to Claire exploring dating/relationships for the first time as a woman.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 06 Jul 2013, 19:51
Double dates? 


Oh, that's right, we still need to pair Claire up with someone. 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 06 Jul 2013, 20:21
Just to clarify, does "vanilla" just mean "not S&amp;M"?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 06 Jul 2013, 21:27
That's the usual meaning in this context.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 06 Jul 2013, 21:38
I never understood that.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 06 Jul 2013, 21:50
So if 'vanilla' means 'non-S&M', does that mean 'chocolate' is 'S&M', or is it something else?

I could make a joke about chocolate involving Is it cold in here?'s post count text, but I'll avoid that one.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 06 Jul 2013, 22:13
The term "vanilla" is not in opposition to chocolate, but is a way of saying "plain". 

"whitebread" is also often used in the same context.  That does not mean S&M is necessarily "pumpernickel" (or rye, for that matter). 
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 06 Jul 2013, 22:29
That sounds kind of judgmental. Is it intended to be so?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: celticgeek on 06 Jul 2013, 22:33
Try this - NSFW (http://docs.google.com/View?id=dd6tvmz9_8gqqsnwf6)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 06 Jul 2013, 22:34
That sounds kind of judgmental. Is it intended to be so?

No, I think people just aren't used to good vanilla ice cream. 


Or good white bread. 




On second thought, yes, it's pretty judgmental.  Think Wonderbread...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Platypodes on 07 Jul 2013, 00:46
Sam's well past the age where she'd need/desire an extra parent in the full sense of the term most likely. So I don't think that's really a consideration. I have no doubt that Sam would appreciate another woman around besides our favorite staff of sassy baristas to get life advice from, and Veronica certainly isn't shy about giving advice when asked, but it wouldn't be "parenting" in the involved sense of raising your offspring for 18 or so years.

Jim struggles to keep Sam under control despite being a pretty firm, take-no-nonsense dad. I wonder if Veronica's dom voice (http://www.questionablecontent.net/view.php?comic=2383) would do the trick with her...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 07 Jul 2013, 08:04
Nah, vanilla just means plain, ordinary, original, unmodified, basic, standard, and so on. Some people have a problem with that to different degrees for different reasons (I generally don't prefer the original version of any given food, Jeph gets bird tattoos, etc.), and it can get equated with boring or uninventive, but in general it is a neutral term.

The best vanilla ice cream I've ever had by a good distance is the Kirkland brand from Costco.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 07 Jul 2013, 08:27
Vanilla ice cream is great!

The term "vanilla" as I know it refers to anything unmodified/plain/normal. When playing video games there is often a difference between people playing the game "vanilla" or playing a largely modified version.

Note that the introductory statement is only in reference to ice cream. I am not talking about anything else. I'll neither speak about, nor confirm or deny any preferences in other topics.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 07 Jul 2013, 08:35
That's okay ankh, we all know you are into smartphones :P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 07 Jul 2013, 08:44
I knew this post was a mistake…
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 07 Jul 2013, 09:30
Ah, right, I've heard of people talking about vanilla Android. But vanilla ice cream doesn't make sense, because how is it unmodified? It has vanilla in it!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 07 Jul 2013, 09:31
It is in a way the most ordinary ice cream. Wherever you are, if they have ice cream, they most likely have vanilla ice cream.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 07 Jul 2013, 09:34
If they have vanilla, they will almost certainly have chocolate.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 07 Jul 2013, 09:39
mmm.... peanut butter swirl ice cream...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: celticgeek on 07 Jul 2013, 11:41
Just to make things more complicated, when I was in the jet engine business, we spoke of vanilla waspaloy. (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Waspaloy)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mtmerrick on 07 Jul 2013, 13:53
Ah, right, I've heard of people talking about vanilla Android. But vanilla ice cream doesn't make sense, because how is it unmodified? It has vanilla in it!

Make sure you don't confuse vanilla (aka ASOP-ish,  as-google-intended android) with stock Android (aka,  unmodified, out-of-the-box software).

People throw around the term "stock android" and it's often not used correctly.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 07 Jul 2013, 14:01
Well on a Nexus device, the "stock Android" is "vanilla Android", so I suppose it's accurate there.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mtmerrick on 07 Jul 2013, 14:13
all these userterms-turned-quasi-official-terms are confusing, aren't they?  :mrgreen:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: FunkyTuba on 07 Jul 2013, 19:56
One other nuance I enjoy about using "vanilla ice cream" as a metaphor for "plain": many other ice creams have a bit of vanilla in them as well. By itself it's one of the finest flavors, but it serves as a baseline for other, perhaps experimental flavors that might not be to everyone's taste. (Sure chocolate, but also neopolitan, rocky road, strawberry, chubby hubby, pistachio, mint chocolate chip, etc)

So IMO the metaphor works best when the subject being compared is just fine in its "vanilla" version, and can become something spectacular when extended or enhanced by creativity, even if that spectacularity is only fully appreciated by a small minority.

I don't intend the use of the term as a pejorative but I can see where someone into a "non-vanilla" scene might think to use it that way to derisively to describe someone who has never bothered to expand their horizons, especially if the vanilla person was hostile to whatever kink was involved.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 07 Jul 2013, 20:02
Makes sense.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 08 Jul 2013, 00:42
Jeph says on Twitter he has migraine. Our best wishes to him. :-)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 08 Jul 2013, 05:00
It is in a way the most ordinary ice cream.

Reminder that the saying has nothing to do with actual ice cream:

"Vainilla is from the diminutive of vaina, from the Latin vagina (sheath) to describe the way the pod must be split open to expose the seeds."
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Jynto on 08 Jul 2013, 05:44
Did anyone miss this?

(http://i.imgur.com/nFtvzHW.png)

The link next to Search always says the name assigned to the Google account you are currently using. For example, mine says +Jonty.

This could mean one of two things:
1) Veronica is using someone else's Google account.
2) Veronica has another pseudonym, ending in 'ph'. Steph? Jeph??
3) The Jeph we know is and has always been an alias of Veronica Reed. Think about it. Have you ever seen her and Jeph in the same room together?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 08 Jul 2013, 07:17
I don't think I have seen you and Veronica in the same room together...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Border Reiver on 08 Jul 2013, 07:22
The same could be said for yourself and Veronica, or almost any of us for that matter....
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Nepiophage on 08 Jul 2013, 07:23
But I'd like to be . .
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 08 Jul 2013, 07:30
It is in a way the most ordinary ice cream.

Reminder that the saying has nothing to do with actual ice cream:

"Vainilla is from the diminutive of vaina, from the Latin vagina (sheath) to describe the way the pod must be split open to expose the seeds."
So vanilla sex is any sex that involves a vagina?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Jynto on 08 Jul 2013, 09:28
The same could be said for yourself and Veronica, or almost any of us for that matter....

Pizza Girl.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Valdís on 08 Jul 2013, 09:53
So vanilla sex is any sex that involves a vagina?

In the same sense that one might say "Intercourse in the missionary position for the purpose of reproduction" to describe lack of variety from what is common. Not literally that.

In any case I find it a largely useless term with loads of personal bias from whoever says it with regards to sex/romance. Less so in regards to unmodified applications, which I use it for too, but etymologically that's a weird use. :-P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Storel on 08 Jul 2013, 11:37
Try this - NSFW (http://docs.google.com/View?id=dd6tvmz9_8gqqsnwf6)

I just want to say that this was hilarious.

That is all.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 09 Jul 2013, 16:52
So vanilla sex is any sex that involves a vagina?

In the same sense that one might say "Intercourse in the missionary position for the purpose of reproduction" to describe lack of variety from what is common. Not literally that.


It's hilarious to request in ERP circles though, or on 4chan, so much rage.

Try this - NSFW (http://docs.google.com/View?id=dd6tvmz9_8gqqsnwf6)

My favorite ice cream (strawberry) matches me surprisingly well
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 09 Jul 2013, 19:30
... I don't want to eat soft-serve anymore.

edit -- bonus points for the reference to the South Carolina governor scandal.  :-P
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Loki on 09 Jul 2013, 21:06
why did i get four redirects on my phone to see the document.

unfortunately, I miss 90% of the references due to infamiliarity with the sorts involved.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: westrim on 09 Jul 2013, 23:00
So vanilla sex is any sex that involves a vagina?
In the same sense that one might say "Intercourse in the missionary position for the purpose of reproduction" to describe lack of variety from what is common. Not literally that.
It's hilarious to request in ERP circles though, or on 4chan, so much rage.
No, 4chan doesn't rage, it engages in mock horror at the perversion of consensual heterosexual sex in the missionary position. It's sometimes surprising how a mass of nameless and anarchic individuals can invoke the same false attitude for the sake of comedy without any breaking character.

Quote

My favorite ice cream (strawberry) matches me surprisingly well.
This is a forum, not a dating service! Although, the last ice cream I had before reading it was cake batter, which hits way too close at the moment. At least it wasn't the 4chan definition of cake.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TinPenguin on 10 Jul 2013, 02:30
Try this - NSFW (http://docs.google.com/View?id=dd6tvmz9_8gqqsnwf6)

My favorite ice cream (strawberry) matches me surprisingly well

My favourite is raspberry ripple, which isn't on the list, which is quite apt.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: mtmerrick on 10 Jul 2013, 03:28
Mr favorite is cookies and cream. Though I also love me some peanut butter cup ice cream as well.

So... I love one night stands but am otherwise unclassifiable? IDK if i like what that says about me... (and I'm not sure it's accurate either)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Thrudd on 10 Jul 2013, 05:17
What does it say if you are lactose intolerant?  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: bhtooefr on 10 Jul 2013, 05:43
God damnit, I don't even have a real doll.

In any case, if you're lactose intolerant, the following things apply:

Masturbation
Lesbian sex

(Sno-cones/shaved ice, and rainbow sherbet.)
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Zebediah on 10 Jul 2013, 06:31
If you're lactose-intolerant, you're a prude.  :-D

Last ice cream I had was maple walnut, which isn't even close to anything on the list. You be the judge.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: cesium133 on 10 Jul 2013, 06:36
Well, there is Black Walnut, which is bestiality.  :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 10 Jul 2013, 15:44
If you're lactose-intolerant, you're a prude.  :-D

Last ice cream I had was maple walnut, which isn't even close to anything on the list. You be the judge.

The last ice cream decides, and not the favourite one? That worries me. A lot. Last time I had ice cream was warm, and I wanted something refreshing with fruit, so I went for lemon. :psyduck:
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 10 Jul 2013, 20:59
Lactose Intolerance is doomed to die a virgin trapped in a terrible romance anime. Welcome to hell.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 11 Jul 2013, 06:18
If you're lactose-intolerant, you're a prude.  :-D
Considering that about 98% of the Thai population is lactose-intolerant, that seems unlikely.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 11 Jul 2013, 08:06
Seriously? That sucks.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 11 Jul 2013, 11:01
Drinking another species's milk in adulthood is a little weird biologically.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: GarandMarine on 11 Jul 2013, 11:08
As long as ice cream and cheese exist I refuse to acknowledge such hateful statements IITCIH
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 11 Jul 2013, 11:12
Drinking another species's milk in adulthood is a little weird biologically.
Drinking your own species's milk in adulthood is what's weird. Why would drinking another species's milk be weirder than eating its muscles?
IITCIH
Google and UD were useless.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Is it cold in here? on 11 Jul 2013, 11:18
Abbreviation for my username.

I can think of lots of examples of animals eating other animals's muscles and organs, but drinking their milk?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 11 Jul 2013, 11:52
Oh, ok. I think the extra letter threw me off. And yeah, I guess it IS unusual. But that doesn't mean it doesn't suck that some people can't do it.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 11 Jul 2013, 14:19
We have some pretty bizarre abilities when it comes to adaptations.  Food's just part of it. 

Plenty of animals make their homes / nests.  We have architecture and interior design. 

Many animals migrate for more comfortable living conditions.  We have heat and central air. 

Many animals travel great distances.  We used other animals to travel, then invented vehicles. 

Our adaptations tend to go the extra mile.  That includes food - if it can be made edible, we'll eat it! 


Hell, even if it can't, we'll find a way...
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: TinPenguin on 11 Jul 2013, 15:16
Hell, even if it ca't, we'll find a way...

Milk's one thing, but I think some people draw the line at eating cat.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Carl-E on 11 Jul 2013, 16:09
typo fixed, expect new typo in three... two...  won...

:roll:

BTW, why won't this thread die?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Mr_Rose on 11 Jul 2013, 16:45
You want a weird adaptation?
Plenty of species have external digestion; flies, fungi and bacteria being the principal proponents.
Humans however are, thus far, unique in having partial external digestion as a cultural artefact; we call it cooking.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 12 Jul 2013, 02:35
Seriously? That sucks.
In much of the world, and certainly in East and South East Asia, it is the continued ability to digest lactose beyond childhood that is unusual. You milk-drinkers are the mutants. Literally (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Lactase_persistence). I am lactose-intolerant, as are about 95% of Chinese people. Ice-cream lovers of the world should consider themselves fortunate that they don't have to compete with with us!
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: J on 12 Jul 2013, 03:27
if i recall correctly, the mutation for lactose tolerance is known to have occurred 4 times, independently in separate human populations around the world. in each case this was followed by a massive population boom, as consuming milk allowed for better nutrition into adulthood.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Overkillengine on 12 Jul 2013, 03:53
To be fair, we're all mutants, it is just a question of what mutations we have.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 12 Jul 2013, 08:23
I'm quite alright with being a mutant. I'm sorry to hear that you are lactose intolerant. Have you tried almond milk? It's pretty good.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Neko_Ali on 12 Jul 2013, 08:37
oooh, I'm a mutant! What super powers do I have? Can I start calling myself Milk Maid now?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 12 Jul 2013, 08:39
Yes. Yes, you can.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: ankhtahr on 12 Jul 2013, 09:48
I'm (dietary) fructose intolerant. That can suck too. Especially nowadays when every company thinks it's easier to advertise something as healthy when it is sweetened with fructose instead of glucose (it's natural, it has to be good!), and other companies increase their sweetening by using mixed fructose and glucose (HFCS e.g.). Luckily this kind of intolerance is based on the ratio of fructose to glucose, so most stuff sweetened with HFCS in Germany (which usually contains less than 50% fructose) is tolerable. Most American stuff with HFCS (in Germany most notably important drinks like Mountain Dew and stuff like Canada Dry) gives me trouble though.

Also I have a tendency to forget about this. Really bad: Drinking half a litre of apple juice before realising that it probably wasn't a good idea.

Edit: I just found this sentence on the English Wikipedia article: "This can cause some surprises and pitfalls for fructose malabsorbers."  :mrgreen:

"Surprises and Pitfalls" sounds a little bit cynical…
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Akima on 12 Jul 2013, 18:01
I'm sorry to hear that you are lactose intolerant.
It's no big. When you come from a culture where nearly everybody is lactose-intolerant, traditional dietary habits are different. And if I go with friends to an ice-cream place, I simply order a "gelato", which, in Australia, means an Italian-style water-ice.
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Method of Madness on 12 Jul 2013, 20:22
I'm curious, though, in a culture where nearly everybody is lactose-intolerant, do the few lactose tolerant people even know that they are? I mean, why would they even try eating dairy if there's only a 1 in 20 chance that it won't make them sick?
Title: Re: WCDT: 2480-2484 (1-5 July, 2013) Weekly Comic Discussion Thread
Post by: Pilchard123 on 13 Jul 2013, 04:02
Sorbet ftw!