THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 28 Mar 2024, 15:55
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 49 50 [51] 52 53   Go Down

Author Topic: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM  (Read 448926 times)

Mark7

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 314
  • My sandbox is crunchy
    • My Music
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2500 on: 11 Jan 2008, 02:44 »

Sod the washing up. I'm trying to work out what's going on on your t-shirt.
Logged
Will be at your local record store this Friday handing out the hot dickings

David_Dovey

  • Nearly grown up
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8,451
  • j'accuse!
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

Peet

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 260
  • The Second Gabber
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2502 on: 11 Jan 2008, 05:58 »



I has new glasses.
Logged
Quote from: Slick
I think Astaldo should be the next Dr. Who

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2503 on: 11 Jan 2008, 09:32 »

My fiancee regularly makes fun of me for being the only person in Chicago who doesn't wear a hat in the winter. I am not a hat person.

No hats in this picture, btu at least theres elbow length satin gloves, maybe we can broaden it to an accesories theme
Either the dudes in the background are under-dressed, or you are way overdressed for that bar.

Dishes suuuuuck
You can't read the text because her boobs are obscuring the words. excellent

Maui

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2504 on: 11 Jan 2008, 11:42 »

Some friends and I at a New Years party.


Some of you may remember Luke from when he lived on the forums a couple years ago.  He has long hair and a life now!  I don't judge him too much for it.


I did not approve of this camera or something.

These were from a friends camera, i don't know why it was the annoying date thing on there.
Logged

pen

  • Asleep in the boner patch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 782
  • Spaghetti!!!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2505 on: 11 Jan 2008, 11:58 »

Rachel, you look so shy in that second pic... it's adorable.
Logged
Cross-dressing national monuments are always exciting.

Emilie__x

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2506 on: 11 Jan 2008, 12:39 »

Noo Yearz shin digz...

I'm certainly none of the following:
(except, perhaps the one on the left... maybe... ¬_¬)




... Loltastic.
Logged

thehollow

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 345
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2507 on: 11 Jan 2008, 13:02 »

My fiancee regularly makes fun of me for being the only person in Chicago who doesn't wear a hat in the winter. I am not a hat person.
I generally don't wear one unless it's really cold out. They mess up my hair and I don't like it. I do get made fun of, however, because I'm not a coat person, so even when it's like 10 below I'll still just wear a hoodie. I don't get cold easily.
Logged

Scandanavian War Machine

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,159
  • zzzzzzzz
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2508 on: 11 Jan 2008, 13:32 »

lucky.

i often wear gloves in the summer because i have bad circulation and am always cold. it's pathetic, really.
Logged
Quote from: KvP
Also I would like to point out that the combination of Sailor Moon and faux-Kerouac / Sonic Youth spelling is perhaps the purest distillation of what this forum is that we have yet been presented with.

LiterSize

  • Curry sauce
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 285
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2509 on: 11 Jan 2008, 13:41 »




hanging out...

Boro_Bandito

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,270
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2510 on: 11 Jan 2008, 13:51 »

Down the streeeeeet
Logged
Yeah, I mean, "I won't kill and eat you if you won't kill and eat me" is typically a ground rule for social groups.

Kytt

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2511 on: 11 Jan 2008, 14:16 »

H@!

Logged

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2512 on: 11 Jan 2008, 14:23 »

lucky.

i often wear gloves in the summer because i have bad circulation and am always cold. it's pathetic, really.


Hey me too! Sometimes my hands will be two different temperatures from each other. Also it is often just my digits, and not my whole hands or feet, that are freezing cold. And sometimes my butt gets cold? It is so weird.
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

ruyi

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 740
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2513 on: 11 Jan 2008, 14:30 »

bed hair, 2:27pm



edit for BREAKING NEWS

here is my cat

« Last Edit: 11 Jan 2008, 14:45 by ruyi »
Logged

Storm Rider

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,075
  • Twelve stories high, made of radiation
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2514 on: 11 Jan 2008, 14:54 »

Wait, Roo. Are you still on vacation? Because I am back at school already!
Logged
Quote
[22:06] Shane: We only had sex once
[22:06] Shane: and she was wicked just...lay there

hannahrochelle

  • Emoticontraindication
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 66
  • \@_o/
    • myspace.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2515 on: 11 Jan 2008, 15:03 »

<picture>

Out of interest is there a factory in Australia churning out incredibly cute girls?

If there is, do they have open days?

Hehe, thank you :) You'll have to visit Oz to find out though :P
Logged
Quote from: jeph
show me a 14 year old with crash-rated boobs and i'll show you a pink elephant

mooface

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2516 on: 11 Jan 2008, 19:17 »

ruyi is supercute!
Logged

jmrz

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 715
  • zomg pale
    • flickr
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2517 on: 11 Jan 2008, 19:41 »

I have new glasses too! Prescription sunglasses so I can see when I go outside.

« Last Edit: 11 Jan 2008, 19:49 by jmrz »
Logged
Quote from: Daniel on Gabbly
princy, this is the time to think with your vagina
Quote from: Iananan on Gabbly
nipples are deactivated at birth, to prevent misfires and accident

PretentiousYoungSuitors

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2518 on: 11 Jan 2008, 19:54 »

ick...

seeing is so mainstream
Logged

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2519 on: 11 Jan 2008, 19:59 »

Somehow those look really, really cool. Awesome!
Logged

bainidhe_dub

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,445
    • tumblr
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2520 on: 12 Jan 2008, 07:52 »

i went on vacation. the weather was nice but i got eaten by a shark.  :-(
Logged
I am lurking so hard right now. You have no idea.

ForteBass

  • Higher than Ol' Scratch
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 673
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2521 on: 12 Jan 2008, 09:50 »

OH NOES!
Logged
Quote from: Eris
Man, Friday night and I'm drawing tacos to post on the internet. I need another drink.

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2522 on: 12 Jan 2008, 09:55 »

sometimes my butt gets cold
You should probably put on some pants.

pocahontas bedsheets
« Last Edit: 12 Jan 2008, 09:57 by jhocking »
Logged

BobJoeJim

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2523 on: 12 Jan 2008, 09:59 »

You should probably put on some pants.
I'm not entirely sure I approve of this suggestion.
Logged

Emilie__x

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2524 on: 12 Jan 2008, 10:16 »


I think I was a retarded child.




& a bit posey...



... But mostly retarded...
Logged

Skibas_clavicle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,278
  • Mo' money, mo' problem.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2525 on: 12 Jan 2008, 18:46 »

I went to the best party ever yesterday, and this is how drunk I got:


My hilarious friend Krista and I paying tribute to the gayest painting ever.

THIS one might be my favourite.
Logged
I like the way you work it.

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2526 on: 12 Jan 2008, 22:18 »

I think all the Australian girls on this board are actually computer generated by the Australian tourism board.
Someone must sig-quote this. DOOOO EEEEET

Spinless

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2527 on: 12 Jan 2008, 23:10 »

Because we can't let a little gem like that one go unnoticed?
Logged

Storm Rider

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,075
  • Twelve stories high, made of radiation
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2528 on: 12 Jan 2008, 23:35 »

Joe, if you enjoy it that much, why don't... you sig quote it?
Logged
Quote
[22:06] Shane: We only had sex once
[22:06] Shane: and she was wicked just...lay there

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2529 on: 12 Jan 2008, 23:36 »

That's not quite what I meant.

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2530 on: 13 Jan 2008, 00:23 »

My hilarious friend Krista and I paying tribute to the gayest painting ever.

If only Krista looked a bit more like you do in that photo, it would be an example of how to seriously contemplate art.
Logged

littlelove

  • Plantmonster
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 47
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2531 on: 13 Jan 2008, 08:18 »



fun curled hair :)
Logged

hannahrochelle

  • Emoticontraindication
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 66
  • \@_o/
    • myspace.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2532 on: 13 Jan 2008, 14:36 »


Infact, I think all the Australian girls on this board are actually computer generated by the Australian tourism board.


Oh noes, we've been found out!
Logged
Quote from: jeph
show me a 14 year old with crash-rated boobs and i'll show you a pink elephant

tania

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,142
  • famed sex columnist
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2533 on: 13 Jan 2008, 19:58 »

we hosted a gender bender party on saturday.
chad didn't have an outfit so i gave him my skirt and bikini top.



admittedly, this next photo is not of me but hopefully i can get away with posting it here on account it was by far the best photo taken of anyone that night:

Logged
Not to sound mysoginist, but I hate women.

Ozymandias

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,497
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2534 on: 13 Jan 2008, 20:04 »

Oh, I can play this game!

Logged
You are 9/11.
You are the terrorist.

Johnny C

  • Mentat
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,483
  • i wanna be yr slide dog
    • I AM A WHORE FOR MY OWN MUSIC
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2535 on: 13 Jan 2008, 21:16 »

Since I rarely put pictures in here anymore, it's about time for a binge. Here's my best Mackaye impersonation.









Logged
[02:12] yuniorpocalypse: let's talk about girls
[02:12] Thug In Kitchen: nooo

Boro_Bandito

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,270
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2536 on: 13 Jan 2008, 21:28 »

your eyes aren't open in a single one of those pictures.
Logged
Yeah, I mean, "I won't kill and eat you if you won't kill and eat me" is typically a ground rule for social groups.

Cartilage Head

  • Only pretending to work
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,182
  • Do Me Baby
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2537 on: 13 Jan 2008, 21:31 »

 Oh my god Ozy.
Logged
Hate, rain on me

Johnny C

  • Mentat
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,483
  • i wanna be yr slide dog
    • I AM A WHORE FOR MY OWN MUSIC
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2538 on: 13 Jan 2008, 21:32 »

The eyes, they are open in the last picture! The tuning peg, she requires the hands-eye co-ordinates!
Logged
[02:12] yuniorpocalypse: let's talk about girls
[02:12] Thug In Kitchen: nooo

hannahrochelle

  • Emoticontraindication
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 66
  • \@_o/
    • myspace.
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2539 on: 13 Jan 2008, 21:34 »

The tuning peg, she requires the hands-eye co-ordinates!

LIES.
Logged
Quote from: jeph
show me a 14 year old with crash-rated boobs and i'll show you a pink elephant

ampersandwitch

  • The Tickler
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 928
  • cuntstruck
Logged

Johnny C

  • Mentat
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,483
  • i wanna be yr slide dog
    • I AM A WHORE FOR MY OWN MUSIC
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2541 on: 13 Jan 2008, 21:45 »

If I were to grab the middle one by accident or bump one of the other pegs I'd be in a worse mess.

During a performance it is not something to be done without care!

As a pretty pretty princess Ozy knows something about this!
Logged
[02:12] yuniorpocalypse: let's talk about girls
[02:12] Thug In Kitchen: nooo

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2542 on: 13 Jan 2008, 21:59 »

Johnny, I am sorry to say that stylistically your hat and your guitar do not really match each other.
Logged

Boro_Bandito

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,270
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2543 on: 13 Jan 2008, 22:19 »

The level of rocking out that you have previously exhibited negates all need ot stay in tune anyway boyo.

But damnit if I didn't just realize exactly who was wearing that dress. It suits you... I suppose, Ozy. I mean, you don't have nearly the level of excuse as the others, unless you were at that same party, which I doubt. So that means you were just doing it to you know... do it.
Logged
Yeah, I mean, "I won't kill and eat you if you won't kill and eat me" is typically a ground rule for social groups.

Johnny C

  • Mentat
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,483
  • i wanna be yr slide dog
    • I AM A WHORE FOR MY OWN MUSIC
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2544 on: 13 Jan 2008, 22:26 »

Johnny, I am sorry to say that stylistically your hat and your guitar do not really match each other.

SGs are expensive but I think I'm getting one next!
Logged
[02:12] yuniorpocalypse: let's talk about girls
[02:12] Thug In Kitchen: nooo

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2545 on: 13 Jan 2008, 22:39 »

Anyway, I was looking at Johnny rockin' the creative muse, and I was thinking, "You know, I'm a creative artist too. How come I don't get to rock the fuck out?" Unfortunately, however, it's not so easy to rock the fuck out when you're a writer:

Logged

Johnny C

  • Mentat
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,483
  • i wanna be yr slide dog
    • I AM A WHORE FOR MY OWN MUSIC
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2546 on: 13 Jan 2008, 22:59 »

WHATEVER YOU DO DON'T RIP IT UP
Logged
[02:12] yuniorpocalypse: let's talk about girls
[02:12] Thug In Kitchen: nooo

CmonMiracle

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2547 on: 14 Jan 2008, 00:50 »

It appears based on the pictures that Johnny rocked out for approximately 20 minutes!
Logged

negative creep

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,421
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2548 on: 14 Jan 2008, 01:33 »


I can do that. (I know it's old, fuck you.)
Logged

IronOxide

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,429
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #2549 on: 14 Jan 2008, 03:45 »

Nah, he was rocking out so intensely that time stopped as he rocked out so hard that he nearly tore a hole in the space-time continuum.
Logged
Quote from: Wikipedia on Elephant Polo
No matches have been played since February 2007, however, when an elephant, protesting a bad call by the referee, went on a rampage during a game, injuring two players and destroying the Spanish team's minibus
Pages: 1 ... 49 50 [51] 52 53   Go Up