Topic: WCT January 5-9 (Read 92563 times)

ecstaticjoy · « **Reply #350 on:** 09 Jan 2009, 10:02 »

great art today and lately, it's amazing what a difference from the start. I know I'm not the first person to mention, but it's still true. beautiful!

raoullefere · « **Reply #351 on:** 09 Jan 2009, 10:03 »

I don't think Dora's hair is a mullet (not 'business' enough in the front), and I much prefer it to the black helmet she'd taken to sporting. In fact, I wonder if she ought to keep dyeing the ends, although that may be hell to draw. And I think in the last panel Dora's eyes are widened in amazment, not mania. The mania-eyes occur in the previous panel where she asks if Marten got a good look at the Hanner-tit.

Poor Dora. Tai's piercing, Hanners' flash—all that stuff she'd enjoy, witnessed by Marten, who is, of course, horrified. Must be frustrating.

Quote from: kaitco on 08 Jan 2009, 19:49

I am not sure if I should be amazed or horrified by the number of people who want Hannelore.

Actually, I had no such inclination until Jeph drew her looking ~~dead~~ sleepily incapacitated. Hence my statement that I found it troubling.

Heavyoak · « **Reply #352 on:** 09 Jan 2009, 10:26 »

Quote from: Kartoon Kween on 07 Jan 2009, 21:52

Okay, I'm not usually one to lust after Hanners, but GOD DAMN.

Fanservice much? Not that I'm complaining...

hells yea!

Quote from: snubnose on 07 Jan 2009, 23:34

Hehe I so envy Marten now, he's holding the one and only Hanners !

And she's wearing hardly much, too.

I so wish I could take martens place right now. I would just lift the lovely hanners up and carry her in and say good night.

Quote from: Thy Dungeonman on 06 Jan 2009, 20:34

I'm surprised that no one's all "OMG HANNERS MIGHT HAVE LONG HAIR TOO", considering all of her fans here. Maybe no one else thought of it yet.

na she looks much cuter in short hair.

Quote from: kifsteve on 07 Jan 2009, 19:57

I would totally take advantage of Hanners, whose with me?

I am. butI would be care full as so not to leave any trace of any thing.

Quote from: bunnyThor on 07 Jan 2009, 20:28

Jeph is finally killing off Hanners! SWEET!

YOU BASTARD!!

twilightneko · « **Reply #353 on:** 09 Jan 2009, 13:09 »

omg! she would be counting the snowflakes.

poor Hanners..

Panel 4 Dora's face. PERFECT for her dialogue.

chrisa1 · « **Reply #354 on:** 09 Jan 2009, 14:15 »

Quote from: wargrafix on 09 Jan 2009, 05:31

lol, inevitable next question by Dora,"Martin, did you motorboat them?"

My question is, for Hanners, would it be atypical to go bra-less? Wouldn't it be characteristic of someone with OCD to be particularly fastidious with personal appearance, hence to be careful with their undergarments?

sudamerican · « **Reply #355 on:** 09 Jan 2009, 15:33 »

i dont like dora's new hair.
i need more beer

Stoutfellow · « **Reply #356 on:** 09 Jan 2009, 15:58 »

Quote from: chrisa1 on 09 Jan 2009, 14:15

My question is, for Hanners, would it be atypical to go bra-less? Wouldn't it be characteristic of someone with OCD to be particularly fastidious with personal appearance, hence to be careful with their undergarments?

It might depend on her meds. We've seen her pantsless before: http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=800.

themacnut · « **Reply #357 on:** 09 Jan 2009, 17:01 »

Quote from: snubnose on 08 Jan 2009, 23:55

Quote from: bhtooefr on 08 Jan 2009, 23:17
Why am I not surprised that Dora didn't have a problem with it?
Err .. because her boyfriend immediately ran to her and confessed, totally guiltfull ? And its just seeing a single breast of another woman, for a short moment, mostly by accident. I doubt many women will have a problem with that. And I really wouldnt want a girlfriend who had.

You're right of course, but some women are insecure enough to freak at the very notion of their boyfriend seeing any part of another woman's naughty bits. I can easily imagine Marten's conversation with Faye (if he had started dating her) about this going very differently, and for Marten, possibly very painfully. (Remember, Faye's still got issues).

frances65406 · « **Reply #358 on:** 09 Jan 2009, 17:43 »

I thought the comic was brilliant

I especially love the quote from Dora at the end. and Marten's facial expression was AWESOME <3

AnkhWL · « **Reply #359 on:** 09 Jan 2009, 17:52 »

Quote from: Stoutfellow on 09 Jan 2009, 15:58

Quote from: chrisa1 on 09 Jan 2009, 14:15
My question is, for Hanners, would it be atypical to go bra-less? Wouldn't it be characteristic of someone with OCD to be particularly fastidious with personal appearance, hence to be careful with their undergarments?

It might depend on her meds. We've seen her pantsless before: http://questionablecontent.net./view.php?comic=800.

QFT. It really depends on the meds and whats going on with the person at the moment. Unless Hanners has a specific compulsion with being well-kept (and I've seen a few strips where she isn't), then people have days where they don't care about their appearance. Plus if she was out in the snow counting snowflakes for four hours ... well I'd say that keeping up her appearance was not on her mind at the time.

I loved today's comic. Its always fun to see Marten flustered and Dora just brushing it off, and I understand where Dora is coming from too.

Kugai · « **Reply #360 on:** 09 Jan 2009, 17:59 »

Quote from: Shok Xone Studios on 09 Jan 2009, 09:46

Quote from: Mr. Skawronska on 09 Jan 2009, 09:17
Imagine how disappointed those geeks would be if they actually MET Summer Glau and realized she was neither crazy NOR socially inept
Then the realization strikes that she probably IS capable of kicking ass, so the kidnapping plot goes right out the window.

Either that, or dealing with the four large gentlemen named Bud, 'Tank', Joe and Karl who discretely follow her entourage.

Awww Marten cuteness. I love the way he confesses here.

Is it just me, or does Dora look all excited in the last two panels?

bhtooefr · « **Reply #361 on:** 09 Jan 2009, 18:16 »

Quote from: Kugai on 09 Jan 2009, 17:59

Is it just me, or does Dora look all excited in the last two panels?

Oh crap. The last thing we need is Handora shippers.

Kugai · « **Reply #362 on:** 09 Jan 2009, 18:32 »

Quote from: bhtooefr on 09 Jan 2009, 18:16

Quote from: Kugai on 09 Jan 2009, 17:59
Is it just me, or does Dora look all excited in the last two panels?

Oh crap. The last thing we need is Handora shippers.

How about Marhandora shipping?

*Laughs manicly*

raoullefere · « **Reply #363 on:** 09 Jan 2009, 20:10 »

Oh, hell, why not a Penewiltaifaystesveravemarhandora. Which I suppose amounts to an orgy, also known cologuillay (here) as 'all gettin' nekkid and gettin' in a pile.'

Curiously, it also vaguely reminds me of the titles of one of the Hindi epics. Go figure.

Tybalt · « **Reply #364 on:** 09 Jan 2009, 21:40 »

Penewiltaifaystesveravemarhandora-SIZE.

From now on, all the people who want hantai are going to get Penewiltaifaystesveravemarhandorasize spammed in their inbox.

Heavyoak · « **Reply #365 on:** 09 Jan 2009, 21:44 »

Quote from: bhtooefr on 09 Jan 2009, 18:16

Quote from: Kugai on 09 Jan 2009, 17:59
Is it just me, or does Dora look all excited in the last two panels?

Oh crap. The last thing we need is Handora shippers.

Or do we?

Kugai · « **Reply #366 on:** 09 Jan 2009, 22:20 »

Quote from: Tybalt on 09 Jan 2009, 21:40

Penewiltaifaystesveravemarhandora-SIZE.

From now on, all the people who want hantai are going to get Penewiltaifaystesveravemarhandorasize spammed in their inbox.

You spamma my inbox I reporta you messages

ecstaticjoy · « **Reply #367 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 00:51 »

Quote from: Tybalt on 09 Jan 2009, 21:40

Penewiltaifaystesveravemarhandora-SIZE.

From now on, all the people who want hantai are going to get Penewiltaifaystesveravemarhandorasize spammed in their inbox.

where do i sign up?

danjc2 · « **Reply #368 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 09:16 »

I can proudly say that i have been reading QC since issue 1111. AKA the April Fool's issue when XKCD redirected me to this wonderous and much more regularly available humour. i spent April's 1-3 reading the ENTIRE archive. and haven't looked back, except to reread. I have to admit though, when you do read through all of the comics, starting from the VERY beginning and coming through, its such a smooth transition that it wasnt until i looked back i realised just how far Jeph had come. it didnt happen overnight folks, Jeph's certainly put a lot of work into it, and he deserves a lot of kudos for bringing us this marvellous comic.
On another note, i think Dora's face in the last two panels really shows how far the art has come. only the slightest changes made her face go from surprised to that slightly cutsey loving look. excellent job.

PS i know im a lurker who comes on to say random points. its how we roll.

masquerade · « **Reply #369 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 09:32 »

Quote from: chrisa1 on 09 Jan 2009, 14:15

My question is, for Hanners, would it be atypical to go bra-less? Wouldn't it be characteristic of someone with OCD to be particularly fastidious with personal appearance, hence to be careful with their undergarments?

She may not be bra-less. My boobs fall out of my bras all the time. They absolutely REFUSE to be contained.
Then again, hers look to be at least three cup sizes smaller than mine...

bhtooefr · « **Reply #370 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 10:41 »

I think you missed some.

Winpenewiltaifaystesveravemarhandorasizebo

kgbisouttogetme · « **Reply #371 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 11:06 »

not only have we seen her pantless, but shes often said she puts her underpants on inside out, so it makes perfect sense that even if she is ocd that shes not fastidious about her garment wearing. on a similar note why are you people so nitpicky about this comic?

Mr. Skawronska · « **Reply #372 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 11:09 »

Quote

on a similar note why are you people so nitpicky about this comic?

Many of us love Hanners because we can relate to her. I'll let you put two and two together.

S

kgbisouttogetme · « **Reply #373 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 11:17 »

the point is not relating to the characters, my thing is people get all nitpicky about something someone says or does because you dont think its "cannon" to the previous story line. its like when people complain that in lotr pippins hand are bound in one scene, unbound in the next shot then bound again in the shot following that. cant you look past that and just enjoy the cartoon?

SirFozzie · « **Reply #374 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 11:33 »

Quote from: bhtooefr on 09 Jan 2009, 18:16

Quote from: Kugai on 09 Jan 2009, 17:59
Is it just me, or does Dora look all excited in the last two panels?

Oh crap. The last thing we need is Handora shippers.

There's a joke about opening Handora's Box there... But I'm going to stay away from any lesbian 'shipping that refers to boxes.

(what do you mean I just did)

bhtooefr · « **Reply #375 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 12:09 »

You know, I realized that joke as soon as I posted it, and realized that trying to keep discussion of "Handora's Box" to a minimum was a good idea.

Heavyoak · « **Reply #376 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 13:04 »

Quote from: SirFozzie on 10 Jan 2009, 11:33

Quote from: bhtooefr on 09 Jan 2009, 18:16
Quote from: Kugai on 09 Jan 2009, 17:59
Is it just me, or does Dora look all excited in the last two panels?

Oh crap. The last thing we need is Handora shippers.

There's a joke about opening Handora's Box there... But I'm going to stay away from any lesbian 'shipping that refers to boxes.

(what do you mean I just did)

do want handoras box.

bhtooefr · « **Reply #377 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 13:20 »

That part that est said about not being creepy?

Yeah, I'd listen to that.

NightOfTheLepus · « **Reply #378 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 14:32 »

Quote from: masquerade on 10 Jan 2009, 09:32

She may not be bra-less. My boobs fall out of my bras all the time. They absolutely REFUSE to be contained.
Then again, hers look to be at least three cup sizes smaller than mine...

this post is useless without pics.

(yeh, i know. but i figured someone oughta say it....)

GreatGonzo · « **Reply #379 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 15:15 »

At least you were classier than some ~~patients~~residents here; you didn't say, "PICS OR IT DIDN'T HAPPEN".

Mr. Skawronska · « **Reply #380 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 16:59 »

Patients? You mean we get MEDS??

Ooooo...Thoooorazine....

S

MrMonk · « **Reply #381 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 17:04 »

Quote from: kgbisouttogetme on 10 Jan 2009, 11:17

its like when people complain that in lotr pippins hand are bound in one scene, unbound in the next shot then bound again in the shot following that.

Crap. Now I have to go find that.

masquerade · « **Reply #382 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 19:26 »

http://forums.questionablecontent.net/index.php/topic,20435.msg758160.html#msg758160
Happy?

Keep in mind I was seventeen here...

kgbisouttogetme · « **Reply #383 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 20:07 »

its in the two towers when aragorn is tracking the hobbits, after they meet up with the riders of rohan

GreatGonzo · « **Reply #384 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 20:34 »

Quote from: masquerade on 10 Jan 2009, 19:26

Keep in mind I was seventeen here...

So no perving!

(Not that anyone on the QC forums would do that.)

masquerade · « **Reply #385 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 20:54 »

Oh no, never. I'm older now but look much the same. Except I tend to be lazy and just let my hair stay curly most of the time. A la http://photos-c.ak.fbcdn.net/photos-ak-sf2p/v155/221/6/22622907/n22622907_33079506_1921.jpg. Going to stop posting piccars now because I don't want to get in trouble.

kgbisouttogetme · « **Reply #386 on:** 10 Jan 2009, 22:37 »

on the 10 scale....... 8.4 damn fine.

GreatGonzo · « **Reply #387 on:** 11 Jan 2009, 05:44 »

Quote from: masquerade on 10 Jan 2009, 20:54

[snippage] Going to stop posting piccars now because I don't want to get in trouble.

Umm . . . I think there has to be actual physical contact for that to happen.

http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/202550.html

raoullefere · « **Reply #388 on:** 11 Jan 2009, 06:53 »

Quote from: bhtooefr on 10 Jan 2009, 10:41

I think you missed some.

Winpenewiltaifaystesveravemarhandorasizebo

It was not a mistake. Pintsize and Winslow, however interesting, are appliances. There, I said it: sensually, I'm a fleshist.*

Jimbo is much too peripheral a character. If ya include him then you have to throw in Ellen, Meena, her axe murderer roommate, Benji, Angus, Faye's sister, Ms. Vance, and the Bianchi elders. And probably god knows who else.

Make a heluva pile, though.
/

*But not, I repeat, not a member of the ARM.

bhtooefr · « **Reply #389 on:** 11 Jan 2009, 07:00 »

But Pintsize was already in the shipmanteau, before I edited it.

raoullefere · « **Reply #390 on:** 11 Jan 2009, 08:14 »

Tybalt added size. I leave you to your own conclusions about that.

Jedit · « **Reply #391 on:** 11 Jan 2009, 09:58 »

Quote from: GreatGonzo on 10 Jan 2009, 20:34

Quote from: masquerade on 10 Jan 2009, 19:26
Keep in mind I was seventeen here...

So no perving!

Come to the UK. Age of consent is 16 here, perv away.

bhtooefr · « **Reply #392 on:** 11 Jan 2009, 10:12 »

Age of consent in Ohio is also 16...

masquerade · « **Reply #393 on:** 11 Jan 2009, 10:21 »

Quote from: kgbisouttogetme on 10 Jan 2009, 22:37

on the 10 scale....... 8.4 damn fine.

/blush

Quote from: GreatGonzo on 11 Jan 2009, 05:44

Quote from: masquerade on 10 Jan 2009, 20:54
[snippage] Going to stop posting piccars now because I don't want to get in trouble.

Umm . . . I think there has to be actual physical contact for that to happen.

http://www.phrases.org.uk/meanings/202550.html

Cutest way to say you're knocked up EVER.

ecstaticjoy · « **Reply #394 on:** 11 Jan 2009, 17:40 »

what did I walk in on?

kgbisouttogetme · « **Reply #395 on:** 11 Jan 2009, 17:57 »

not sure. people... uh being pervy. (hit that doughnut)

ecstaticjoy · « **Reply #396 on:** 12 Jan 2009, 01:50 »

was that sexual reference to this?

kgbisouttogetme · « **Reply #397 on:** 12 Jan 2009, 12:15 »

that was actually a referance to a completely different website. www.cutewithchris.com

THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

Author Topic: WCT January 5-9 (Read 92563 times)

twilightneko

frances65406

danjc2

masquerade

masquerade

masquerade

masquerade