THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 25 Apr 2024, 01:55
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 7   Go Down

Author Topic: TOMMY!!  (Read 48612 times)

Spluff

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,410
  • it is time to party
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #100 on: 24 Jan 2011, 02:02 »

Audrey Hepburn is pretty cute, but no matter how nice an ass you stick on her she'll always just be cute. She's basically the Audrey Tautou of five decades ago.
Logged
[16:27] Ozy:  has joined the room
[16:27] Quietus: porn necklace!
[16:27] Quietus: Shove it up yer vag!
[16:27] Ozy: has left the room

Barmymoo

  • Mentat
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,926
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #101 on: 24 Jan 2011, 12:46 »

Both of those people are really attractive, who is it that you're considering more attractive than them? I'm genuinely interested, not criticising.

Also, Jens, I will watch any film which is in English and showing on a Sunday afternoon, since it only costs me 5,90 Euros and I have nothing else to do. But I quite like Anna Hathaway so I went for that one and it was pretty funny.
Logged
There's this really handy "other thing" I'm going to write as a footnote to my abstract that I can probably explore these issues in. I think I'll call it my "dissertation."

Spluff

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,410
  • it is time to party
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #102 on: 24 Jan 2011, 22:25 »

To take an immediate example, Anne Hathaway.
Logged
[16:27] Ozy:  has joined the room
[16:27] Quietus: porn necklace!
[16:27] Quietus: Shove it up yer vag!
[16:27] Ozy: has left the room

David_Dovey

  • Nearly grown up
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8,451
  • j'accuse!
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #103 on: 25 Jan 2011, 11:27 »

What the fuck is wrong with cute
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

valley_parade

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,169
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #104 on: 25 Jan 2011, 11:29 »

Wait yeah, that.
Logged
Wait so you're letting something that happened 10 years ago ruin your quality of life? What are you, America? :psyduck:

Alex C

  • comeback tour!
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,915
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #105 on: 26 Jan 2011, 01:56 »

pretty cute, but no matter how nice an ass you stick on her she'll always just be cute.

That is exactly how I feel about Anne Hathaway. I like cute though.
Logged
the ship has Dr. Pepper but not Mr. Pibb; it's an absolute goddamned travesty

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #106 on: 26 Jan 2011, 02:53 »

I'm gonna say it. "Cute" is better than "beautiful".
Logged

allison

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,182
  • i really want a mustache
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #107 on: 26 Jan 2011, 05:31 »

I don't know if I who would take "Gosh you're cute!" over "You are so beautiful", though. I mean, speaking from the everyone-calls-me-cute point of view.
Logged
Quote
[00:30] KharBevNor: Crawling undead terrorcocks

KharBevNor

  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,456
  • broadly tolerated
    • http://mirkgard.blogspot.com/
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #108 on: 26 Jan 2011, 05:33 »

It's probably worth noting that Owen Wilson co-wrote a few of the Wes Anderson flicks, so he's not completely useless.

But Dovey! All Wes Anderson's films are terrible!
Logged
[22:25] Dovey: i don't get sigquoted much
[22:26] Dovey: like, maybe, 4 or 5 times that i know of?
[22:26] Dovey: and at least one of those was a blatant ploy at getting sigquoted

http://panzerdivisio

JD

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,803
  • The Phallussar
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #109 on: 26 Jan 2011, 08:11 »

You could also spoiler tag em.
Logged
Quote from: Jimmy the Squid
Hey JD, I really like your penis, man.

Mein Tumblr

valley_parade

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,169
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #110 on: 26 Jan 2011, 08:12 »

It's probably worth noting that Owen Wilson co-wrote a few of the Wes Anderson flicks, so he's not completely useless.

But Dovey! All Wes Anderson's films are terrible!

Khar, you just lost every ounce of respect I ever had for you.
Logged
Wait so you're letting something that happened 10 years ago ruin your quality of life? What are you, America? :psyduck:

Allybee

  • The German Chancellory building
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 474
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #111 on: 26 Jan 2011, 19:57 »

Logged
radical dame

Lunchbox

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,784
  • Resident Beard Advisor
    • Tiger Darling
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #112 on: 26 Jan 2011, 21:58 »

Logged

Ozymandias

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,497
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #113 on: 26 Jan 2011, 22:13 »

Logged
You are 9/11.
You are the terrorist.

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #114 on: 26 Jan 2011, 22:49 »



This is it, this is what all the centuries of inbreeding were for.
« Last Edit: 26 Jan 2011, 22:52 by Inlander »
Logged

Eris

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,919
  • bzzzz
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #115 on: 26 Jan 2011, 23:20 »

I went to an exhibition of photos by Annie Leibovitz today, and saw the most amazing photo of the queen.



Look at that sky! And the cape!
Logged
Quote from: Drunk Pete
MACHINS CON ESFU EPETE

Gemmwah

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,240
  • fffffffffffffffffff
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #116 on: 26 Jan 2011, 23:55 »

Logged
oh good god 4lko jaeger bomb. Holy goood god what have I done.
 :psyduck: psyduck is the most appropriate right now. FUUUUKC

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #117 on: 27 Jan 2011, 00:35 »



Sorry I am boring, guys. I guess I just like 40-something dudes that everyone else on the planet thinks is attractive, too. What can I say?
« Last Edit: 27 Jan 2011, 00:38 by calenlass »
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

JimmyJazz

  • The German Chancellory building
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 450
  • World's Forgotten Boy
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #118 on: 27 Jan 2011, 01:15 »



I don't care what anybody says, Patti Smith used to be an attractive lady back in the day.
« Last Edit: 27 Jan 2011, 09:38 by JimmyJazz »
Logged
Tell her to buy a cosmo magazine, usually they have an article titled 101 ways to put stuff in your manfriend's butt.

KharBevNor

  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,456
  • broadly tolerated
    • http://mirkgard.blogspot.com/
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #119 on: 27 Jan 2011, 06:24 »

Khar, you just lost every ounce of respect I ever had for you.

You like Wes Anderson films Shane? I knew you were write but I didn't realise you were also upper middle class, self-absorbed, shallow and vaguely racist.
Logged
[22:25] Dovey: i don't get sigquoted much
[22:26] Dovey: like, maybe, 4 or 5 times that i know of?
[22:26] Dovey: and at least one of those was a blatant ploy at getting sigquoted

http://panzerdivisio

Johnny C

  • Mentat
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,483
  • i wanna be yr slide dog
    • I AM A WHORE FOR MY OWN MUSIC
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #120 on: 27 Jan 2011, 07:24 »

you'll have to run the racism part by me
Logged
[02:12] yuniorpocalypse: let's talk about girls
[02:12] Thug In Kitchen: nooo

valley_parade

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,169
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #121 on: 27 Jan 2011, 07:46 »

You like Wes Anderson films Shane? I knew you were write but I didn't realise you were also upper middle class, self-absorbed, shallow and vaguely racist.

Well...duh. There's more to me than just talking about football with Rob and Tommy in Meebo.

Logged
Wait so you're letting something that happened 10 years ago ruin your quality of life? What are you, America? :psyduck:

Yayniall

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,009
  • ◔ ◡ ◔
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #122 on: 27 Jan 2011, 08:18 »

Logged

Barmymoo

  • Mentat
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,926
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #123 on: 27 Jan 2011, 13:08 »

Ugh. I can't stand that woman.
Logged
There's this really handy "other thing" I'm going to write as a footnote to my abstract that I can probably explore these issues in. I think I'll call it my "dissertation."

Gemmwah

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,240
  • fffffffffffffffffff
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #124 on: 27 Jan 2011, 15:05 »

I consider Nigella Lawson very serious competition when it comes to my girlfriend, because everytime she comes on the tv, Clare goes into some sort of older-woman-coma and I'm left sat there like a nob.
Logged
oh good god 4lko jaeger bomb. Holy goood god what have I done.
 :psyduck: psyduck is the most appropriate right now. FUUUUKC

KharBevNor

  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,456
  • broadly tolerated
    • http://mirkgard.blogspot.com/
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #125 on: 27 Jan 2011, 15:14 »

you'll have to run the racism part by me

I said vaguely racist. Mostly this impression is based on The Darjeeling Limited, a film I have only seen brief parts of because it was really bad. I will admit to not having fully perused the entire ouevre because I find every one of his films I've tried to watch frankly embarrassing as cultural artefacts. I have seen bits of most of his films though; I once shared a house with several film students, one of whom was obsessed with like, Anderson and Michel Gondry.
Logged
[22:25] Dovey: i don't get sigquoted much
[22:26] Dovey: like, maybe, 4 or 5 times that i know of?
[22:26] Dovey: and at least one of those was a blatant ploy at getting sigquoted

http://panzerdivisio

Tom

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,037
  • 8==D(_(_(
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #126 on: 27 Jan 2011, 15:54 »

Logged

Ozymandias

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,497
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #127 on: 27 Jan 2011, 15:58 »

Logged
You are 9/11.
You are the terrorist.

Johnny C

  • Mentat
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,483
  • i wanna be yr slide dog
    • I AM A WHORE FOR MY OWN MUSIC
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #128 on: 27 Jan 2011, 16:09 »

you'll have to run the racism part by me

I said vaguely racist. Mostly this impression is based on The Darjeeling Limited, a film I have only seen brief parts of because it was really bad.

so you saw part of a movie with brown guys in it, which is also a movie about tourists, and are now tossing arguments of "vague racism" at it. i say this only because there is a potential argument to make about it but like i'm not sure it's an entirely intellectually honest argument since it relies on deep misunderstandings of the main characters (viz. that in fact the white people in the film are quite strongly cultural tourists, and that they gloss over the diverse complexity of the nation by doing goofily what their mother does in a serious and equally problematic way, which on a second viewing was one of the most interesting subtexts of the film)

sorry i just enjoy wes anderson's arch, precious films about rich people*

*from which category you should probably exclude bottle rocket, which is decidedly not about a bunch of privileged people's problems, and rushmore, which is in part a film about a dude from the outside of wealthy america's odd little social sphere trying desperately to become a part of it and discovering that in fact acts performed in the worship of social status are somewhat hollow in the face of acts formed from a desire and need to connect empathetically to other human beings
Logged
[02:12] yuniorpocalypse: let's talk about girls
[02:12] Thug In Kitchen: nooo

Tom

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,037
  • 8==D(_(_(
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #129 on: 27 Jan 2011, 16:12 »


Logged

Tom

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,037
  • 8==D(_(_(
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #130 on: 27 Jan 2011, 16:13 »

Logged

pwhodges

  • Admin emeritus
  • Awakened
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 17,241
  • I'll only say this once...
    • My home page
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #131 on: 27 Jan 2011, 16:14 »

Quote
You don't have permission to access /images/alan.turing.jpg on this server.
Logged
"Being human, having your health; that's what's important."  (from: Magical Shopping Arcade Abenobashi )
"As long as we're all living, and as long as we're all having fun, that should do it, right?"  (from: The Eccentric Family )

michaelicious

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,574
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #132 on: 27 Jan 2011, 16:35 »

you'll have to run the racism part by me

I said vaguely racist. Mostly this impression is based on The Darjeeling Limited, a film I have only seen brief parts of because it was really bad. I will admit to not having fully perused the entire ouevre because I find every one of his films I've tried to watch frankly embarrassing as cultural artefacts. I have seen bits of most of his films though; I once shared a house with several film students, one of whom was obsessed with like, Anderson and Michel Gondry.

I justify it to myself by saying that the Darjeeling Limited is an exploration of the sort of arrogance and Orientalism that often leads people to travel to India on 'spiritual journeys'. The tourist industry and neo-colonialism are pretty intimately linked. There is idealisation, and perhaps homogenisation, of the culture but I think that gives the viewer a better understanding of how the characters are maybe seeing things. I don't think Indian people are necessarily denigrated by the film.

I guess you could say it is racist because the film is organised around white consciousness. It is a movie about India without any really developed Indian characters. India and its people are sort of reduced to the ground for these privileged grown up children to work out their 'daddy issues'.

I contradicted myself a bit, but I am okay with that.. I was mostly just trying to work it out in my head rather than present an argument.
Logged

Inlander

  • coprophage
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 7,152
  • Hug your local saintly donkey.
    • Instant Life Substitute
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #133 on: 27 Jan 2011, 17:00 »

Yeah except it's not a film about India. It's a film about white people travelling through India. There's all the difference in the world.
Logged

michaelicious

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,574
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #134 on: 27 Jan 2011, 18:20 »

Yeah that is where my second train of thought sort of breaks down.
Logged

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #135 on: 27 Jan 2011, 18:36 »

I said vaguely racist. Mostly this impression is based on The Darjeeling Limited, a film I have only seen brief parts of because it was really bad.

One of the plot points in The Royal Tenenbaums was Gene Hackman's character being vaguely racist (his ex-wife was marrying a black guy) but I don't recall anything to suggest that Wes Anderson is vaguely racist. But yeah his movies get tedious for other reasons (you mentioned how self-absorbed the characters are.)

anderson cooper

I passed him in Columbus Circle when I live in NYC. He must have had a bad day at the office because he was scowling something fierce.
« Last Edit: 27 Jan 2011, 18:40 by jhocking »
Logged

Katherine

  • The German Chancellory building
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 459
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #136 on: 27 Jan 2011, 20:49 »

Logged

Der Golem

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 309
    • http://www.ihavenowebsite.com
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #137 on: 27 Jan 2011, 21:16 »

Should have been the pagebreak.
Logged

imagist42

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,196
  • more post-coital, less post-rock
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #138 on: 28 Jan 2011, 08:19 »

Quick! Trade posts with Joe!
Logged
Hopefully it goes without saying but you should always ask before sticking things in people's butts

KharBevNor

  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,456
  • broadly tolerated
    • http://mirkgard.blogspot.com/
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #139 on: 28 Jan 2011, 08:35 »

Don't the white dudes in the Darjeeling Limited, or at least one of them, 'find themselves' in the arms of a dusky magic brown-person lady? I admit that my memories of a film I saw partly a few years ago may be muddied, but I thought it was a neo-colonialist fantasy then and I have no particular reason to re-watch it because Wes Anderson films are terrible. And I don't like terrible things! I will keep calling Wes Anderson vaguely racist because I have no interest in 'intellectual honesty' and because it mildly annoys people who like Wes Anderson films, who shouldn't like Wes Anderson films because Wes Anderson films are terrible.

Also, his work embodies fascist aesthetics. When you combine that with the fact that he is vaguely racist, he is basically Hitler. The Hitler of making films that are terrible.
Logged
[22:25] Dovey: i don't get sigquoted much
[22:26] Dovey: like, maybe, 4 or 5 times that i know of?
[22:26] Dovey: and at least one of those was a blatant ploy at getting sigquoted

http://panzerdivisio

Johnny C

  • Mentat
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,483
  • i wanna be yr slide dog
    • I AM A WHORE FOR MY OWN MUSIC
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #140 on: 28 Jan 2011, 09:25 »

I have no interest in 'intellectual honesty'

man it's not like you're a new poster here, i know this is patently untrue

e: but then again

Quote
Let me be clear: I am not calling Anderson a fascist, nor am I calling his work fascist propaganda. I only submit that certain tastes, patterns, and inclinations of his work can be identified with a fascist aesthetic.

so like i mean what is your deal
« Last Edit: 28 Jan 2011, 09:28 by Johnny C »
Logged
[02:12] yuniorpocalypse: let's talk about girls
[02:12] Thug In Kitchen: nooo

E. Spaceman

  • GET ON THE NIGHT TRAIN
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,630
  • The Sonics The Sonics The Sonics The Sonics
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #141 on: 28 Jan 2011, 09:31 »





come on.
Logged
Quote
[20:29] Quietus: Haha oh shit Morbid Anal Fog
[20:29] Quietus: I had forgotten about them

Johnny C

  • Mentat
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,483
  • i wanna be yr slide dog
    • I AM A WHORE FOR MY OWN MUSIC
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #142 on: 28 Jan 2011, 09:32 »

i was going to bring up neofolk
Logged
[02:12] yuniorpocalypse: let's talk about girls
[02:12] Thug In Kitchen: nooo

Joseph

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,822
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #143 on: 28 Jan 2011, 10:11 »

Logged

Tyler

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 804
  • SKULLTOPUS
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #144 on: 28 Jan 2011, 10:20 »



Fascist Anderson?
Logged
Quote from: Lunchbox
It is not wussy. There are orifices being assaulted all over the shop.

Barmymoo

  • Mentat
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,926
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #145 on: 28 Jan 2011, 14:07 »

Jens and I watched The Darjeeling Limited at Christmas 2009 and I thought it wasn't very good, but I think Jens thought it was. I have no idea what was going on in it so I didn't like it. I have simple tastes in films.



(By the way, when I googled to find that picture I accidentally typoed and at first got this which I find hilarious.)
Logged
There's this really handy "other thing" I'm going to write as a footnote to my abstract that I can probably explore these issues in. I think I'll call it my "dissertation."

KharBevNor

  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,456
  • broadly tolerated
    • http://mirkgard.blogspot.com/
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #146 on: 28 Jan 2011, 14:20 »

i was going to bring up neofolk

Yeah, but they're pretty up-front about the imagery they employ. Wes Anderson is a crypto-fascist, the most dangerous form of fascist.

In many ways, Wes Anderson is worse than Hitler.
Logged
[22:25] Dovey: i don't get sigquoted much
[22:26] Dovey: like, maybe, 4 or 5 times that i know of?
[22:26] Dovey: and at least one of those was a blatant ploy at getting sigquoted

http://panzerdivisio

michaelicious

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,574
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #147 on: 28 Jan 2011, 16:34 »

Worse than single serve coffee machines?
Logged

Johnny C

  • Mentat
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 9,483
  • i wanna be yr slide dog
    • I AM A WHORE FOR MY OWN MUSIC
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #148 on: 28 Jan 2011, 17:08 »

Yeah, but they're pretty up-front about the imagery they employ.

oh well then that's okay
Logged
[02:12] yuniorpocalypse: let's talk about girls
[02:12] Thug In Kitchen: nooo

David_Dovey

  • Nearly grown up
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 8,451
  • j'accuse!
Re: TOMMY!!
« Reply #149 on: 28 Jan 2011, 19:25 »

1) WHY IS ANYBODY EVER ANYWHERE SURPRISED THAT KHAR DOESN'T LIKE WES ANDERSON

2) I'm pretty sure I leveled the exact same arguments at Khar re: his love of lots and lots and shitloads of stuff that overtly uses fascistic imagery up to and including genuine Neo-Nazis in the "We hate sports" thread and he pulled the same stupid + transparent little bit of logical gymnastics whereby actual fascists are totally acceptable as opposed to things that seem vaguely fascistic in really weak and insignificant ways. Give up guys, yr weapons are useless against him.
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.
Pages: 1 2 [3] 4 5 ... 7   Go Up