The horrible part of it is that Mr Bureaucrat is actually 100% factually correct about the situation.
I think it's the aggressive nature of disinterest that really burns.
I think these two statements summarise the nature of the problem best.
Yes, everything he says is true. Including his implied inability to do anything of substance. But there's a huge difference between "look, we have no budget for this. I really don't think we can do anything here. Let's look at what you have and figure out where any wriggle room in the system is" and "there's no budget for this. Ipso facto, you're wasting your time and mine".
Dude's JOB is to work within the system. Not hold it up as an all-purpose shield from having anything accomplished.
Or to quote Big Lebowski: he's not wrong; he's just an asshole.
EDIT: I don't even know what made me think of it, because the situation is nothing alike beyond a surface level "short on resources" similarity, but I'm reminded of a (probably false, but it makes for a good story) situation that allegedly occurred during Nazi occupation of Poland.
An officer of the Polish Resistance contacted his superiors to get the squad's allotment of personal arms (seeing as it's pretty difficult to conduct war without firearms). His fairly large squad got assigned, I think, five rifles and one handgun. Which is a ridiculous number, but on the other hand - what can you do when the resistance in the region physically didn't have any more guns, right?
The officer's response was to jokingly say: "we'll make do, but maybe you have some bows and arrows we could use at least?".
Point is, I'm not saying the bureaucrat in QC is not in a no-win situation. What I *am* saying is maybe he should be trying to figure out where to get some bows and arrows. And it doesn't even seem to occur to him.