On the "art is politics" line of discussion; I don't know if I necessarily agree, at least if the argument is that art is ALWAYS politics. I don't think that art by definition must be politically skewed, or even politically minded. I think that art should be driven by passion. Therein lies the crossover; Khar, you say that you are using your art to, quote: "communicate my political, social and philosophical ideas." I guess I'm trying to argue that this is just a reflection of what you are passionate about, so that is where you find your muse. I commend you for it. I haven't had the opportunity to see any of your artwork, but I appreciate that you are trying to use it as a vehicle. By the same token, let's take someone who writes a sonnet for his lover, or who paints a portrait of his mother to show his appreciation for all she's done for him, or anything along that line; it's political in nature, but I would argue it has as much artistic merit as anything in the "political" spectrum.
I'm very much entralled by the idea of art as emotion and passion, more so than art as politics. I just think there is much crossover between the two.
Hopefully this didn't sound too pretentious, and I didn't come across as having my head stuck quite far up my ass...