THESE FORUMS NOW CLOSED (read only)

  • 10 Nov 2024, 12:05
  • Welcome, Guest
Please login or register.

Login with username, password and session length
Advanced search  
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 53   Go Down

Author Topic: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM  (Read 508793 times)

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1000 on: 26 Oct 2007, 03:13 »

Bedhead is sexy because of when you get to see it.  :evil:

The extra letter

  • The German Chancellory building
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 487
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1001 on: 26 Oct 2007, 05:19 »

This an is awesome t-shirt I got yesterday. I think it's awesome.



It's a bit tight around the moobs, but other than that it's totally awesome.
Logged
Hush, may I ask you all for silence? The dreamer is still asleep.

Patrick

  • where did it cost?
  • Awakened
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 10,263
  • Used to be a cool kid
    • Troubador! bandcamp page
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1002 on: 26 Oct 2007, 06:02 »



HEY JOE IS MY BEDHEAD SEXY TOO?
Logged
My long-dead band Troubador! licks your gentlemen's legumes on the cheap

0bsessions

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,242
  • Change Is Taking the Seventh Dick
    • Quiki
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1003 on: 26 Oct 2007, 06:39 »

Guys! Who wants to see my bedhead? It's astounding!
Logged
I've decided to give up psychology and become a peacock
Quote from: Tommydski in Gabbly
JON MADE ME GAY

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1004 on: 26 Oct 2007, 07:15 »



My Bedhead.
Logged

CmonMiracle

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1005 on: 26 Oct 2007, 09:36 »

Leave it to the guys to pass up an opportunity to compliment Mai and instead take a joke and run with it.  :laugh:
Logged

TheFuriousWombat

  • GET ON THE NIGHT TRAIN
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,513
    • WXBC Bard College Radio Online
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1006 on: 26 Oct 2007, 10:03 »

Tumbling Tower II blocks (they're not fucking Jenga blocks, for the last time) take a tremendous amount of time to balance on one's face. I think you'll agree, though, that it was well worth it:

Logged
I punched all the girls in the face on the way to the booth to vote for Hitler.

Hollow Press (my blog)

SusurrusIgnoramus

  • Furry furrier
  • **
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 155
  • Up yours, Mr. Bear!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1008 on: 26 Oct 2007, 12:07 »

i think that's one of the few videos i've seen on college humor that are of any worth.
Logged
"Liquor doesn't punch holes in walls, you just hate your dad."

Something Witty

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • All roads lead to WAAAGH!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1009 on: 26 Oct 2007, 13:11 »

Your bedhead is not the worst I've ever seen, mooface. In fact, if it was a bit more messy than that, I'd be inclined to think it was styled that way instead of bedhead.
Logged
I see angels on Ariels in leather and chrome, Swooping down from heaven to carry me home.

Renalia

  • Not quite a lurker
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 19
  • LIKE EAGLES... ON... POGO STICKS
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1010 on: 26 Oct 2007, 13:28 »




That picture was taken long ago. At least 4 years. Or something. I have since gained contacts, a full goatee, and a double chin. I'm trying to get rid of one of those things.

Maybe if I actually decide to shave I'll post a new picture. :P
Logged

Mark7

  • Pneumatic ratchet pants
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 314
  • My sandbox is crunchy
    • My Music
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1011 on: 26 Oct 2007, 13:35 »

What is it with "big boned" men and goatees?
Logged
Will be at your local record store this Friday handing out the hot dickings

redglasscurls

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,614
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1012 on: 26 Oct 2007, 14:54 »

To hide said chin?
Logged
Denn Du Bist, Was Du Isst   (you are what you eat)
also, related to burning stuff: a friend threw up on a hot water heater once, the vomit steam burned her face. awesome!

calenlass

  • Born in a Nalgene bottle
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,076
  • queefcicle!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1013 on: 26 Oct 2007, 15:00 »

Guys my bedhead is not "bedhead" so much as "afro". Does this still count?
Logged
Hey everyone, I need to buy some new bookshelves. When I get back from Ikea and put them together you're all invited to the bookshelf launch party.

Boro_Bandito

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,270
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1014 on: 26 Oct 2007, 18:42 »

that's exactly why I'm trying to grow mine out, though I just don't have the patience for it. Let the double-chin be seen!
Logged
Yeah, I mean, "I won't kill and eat you if you won't kill and eat me" is typically a ground rule for social groups.

Something Witty

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • All roads lead to WAAAGH!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1015 on: 26 Oct 2007, 18:55 »

Guys my bedhead is not "bedhead" so much as "afro". Does this still count?
You have to post pictures for us to judge.
Logged
I see angels on Ariels in leather and chrome, Swooping down from heaven to carry me home.

BobJoeJim

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1016 on: 27 Oct 2007, 00:09 »

Wow, there is a remarkable number of gorgeous women who frequent this forum and, fortunately, this thread.  I'll refrain from naming specific examples in a feudal attempt to minimize the creepiness factor.  Also to avoid carpal tunnel syndrome.  Anyway, this is what I look like:



oregon coast.
freeze your ass off, FOR FREE! :D

Sweet!  I'm not the only Oregonian here!

Yes, "feudal" was an intentional misspelling.  Hopefully saying so doesn't ruin the joke, as long as it's in tiny unreadable text at the bottom of the post.
« Last Edit: 27 Oct 2007, 00:12 by BobJoeJim »
Logged

koernel

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1017 on: 27 Oct 2007, 03:00 »



a good friend of mine (left) and me drinking good, german beer :)

ps: for the foolish guys: i am the one with the glasses :P
Logged

schimmy

  • The Tickler
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 924
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1018 on: 27 Oct 2007, 03:22 »


School trip to Italy.
Alcohol.
Logged

Jimmy the Squid

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,543
  • Feminist Killjoy
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1019 on: 27 Oct 2007, 04:52 »

I am so sure I went out with that girl when I was in highschool. She was a nutbag and didn't like cuddles.
Logged
Once I got drunk and threw up in the vegetable drawer of an old disused fridge while dressed as a cat

Boro_Bandito

  • William Gibson's Babydaddy
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,270
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1020 on: 27 Oct 2007, 05:54 »

I was really about to correct you BobJoeJim, showed me!

The guy in the background of that photo has an Awesome looking shirt, is that a pink and yellow cobra?
Logged
Yeah, I mean, "I won't kill and eat you if you won't kill and eat me" is typically a ground rule for social groups.

koernel

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1021 on: 27 Oct 2007, 12:48 »

I think he has a fascinating double chin
Logged

jodizzle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,253
  • Stairs will tear us apart
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1022 on: 27 Oct 2007, 19:26 »

I went to a dress up interactive screening of the Rocky Horror Picture Show last night.  Guess which trampy maid won best dressed female   :wink:







I find it more than a little sad that I didn't have to buy a single new thing for this costume.  I just took things out of my regular wardrobe.
Logged
Quote from: Hannah in Meebly
you it be the mics taht are broked?
Quote from: ViolentDove
But then again, I used to dress like the bastard child of a drug-addled punk and a shrubbery.

Something Witty

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • All roads lead to WAAAGH!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1023 on: 27 Oct 2007, 20:40 »

I've said it before and I'll say it again:

ebony_willow,
Logged
I see angels on Ariels in leather and chrome, Swooping down from heaven to carry me home.

Ballard

  • Older than Moses
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,211
  • This is my happening and it freaks me out!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1024 on: 27 Oct 2007, 20:50 »

See above.
Logged
I'm like the boy who cried "you guys are faggots"

muteKi

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1025 on: 27 Oct 2007, 20:52 »

The last thing you say is what makes the whole thing so [creepy]incredibly hot[/creepy].
Logged

jodizzle

  • Scrabble hacker
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,253
  • Stairs will tear us apart
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1026 on: 27 Oct 2007, 21:18 »

I got a bottle of wine for it!  And assorted other gifts.  It was awesome because I didn't even try
Logged
Quote from: Hannah in Meebly
you it be the mics taht are broked?
Quote from: ViolentDove
But then again, I used to dress like the bastard child of a drug-addled punk and a shrubbery.

ruyi

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 740
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1027 on: 27 Oct 2007, 22:17 »

have a lap dance

Logged

Gryff

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,109
  • Summary sense... tingling!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1028 on: 28 Oct 2007, 01:35 »

RUUUYIIIII

ruyi

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 740
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1029 on: 28 Oct 2007, 02:03 »

WAHAAT
WHAT
ATWHAT
WAHT

GRYFFFFFFFFFF
Logged

Lunchbox

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,784
  • Resident Beard Advisor
    • Tiger Darling
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1030 on: 28 Oct 2007, 02:41 »

QC People met in Newcastle!

On two seperate days!









There is a set of more pictures if anybody wants to look!
Right here!
« Last Edit: 28 Oct 2007, 03:29 by Lunchbox »
Logged

est

  • this is a test
  • Admin emeritus
  • Older than Moses
  • *
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 4,157
  • V O L L E Y B A L L
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1031 on: 28 Oct 2007, 03:19 »

cross-posting madness!

1. Ally totally scraped this into the rock while we were there.  I saw her do it.  Erik and Hanana saw her do it.  We all did.


2. This is Erik sitting inside the cage some local people constructed around him to keep him from ever leaving.  They also built a shrine to him just out of the picture and were genuflecting profusely.  Their chanting actually got a bit tiresome.


3. I had to set my camera to the macro setting for this picture.  The beach in the background isn't really all that far away, Hanana is just really tiny.


4. It was a lovely day at the beach!


* NB: 3 out of 4 of these statements are actually lies
Logged

jmrz

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 715
  • zomg pale
    • flickr
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1032 on: 28 Oct 2007, 03:39 »

And some of my photos!




Logged
Quote from: Daniel on Gabbly
princy, this is the time to think with your vagina
Quote from: Iananan on Gabbly
nipples are deactivated at birth, to prevent misfires and accident

Lunchbox

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,784
  • Resident Beard Advisor
    • Tiger Darling
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1033 on: 28 Oct 2007, 03:43 »

Oh god is that what I really look like in those pants?
Logged

Spinless

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1034 on: 28 Oct 2007, 05:39 »

That looks like SO much fun.

My bedhead:



Is better than my regular hair...
Logged

Slick

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,788
  • I am become biscuit
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1035 on: 28 Oct 2007, 08:10 »

Dear Australia,
Stop hogging all the pretty and awesome. Just because it is cold where I am doesn't mean we don't deserve some of that too.
Cordially,
James Crawford,
Esq.
Logged
It's a roasted cocoa bean, commonly found in vaginas.

ampersandwitch

  • The Tickler
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 928
  • cuntstruck
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1036 on: 28 Oct 2007, 10:49 »

To make things short, the reason I have a panda earring in my nose is because I was showering too hard after a big plane trip and my nose screw which is patently designed to not fall out fell out.  The physics of the mechanism proved too complex for my simple hyu-man mind, but I was still worried about it falling out. 

I'm a fool.
Logged

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1037 on: 28 Oct 2007, 12:08 »

That is pretty awesome.
Logged

Spinless

  • Guest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1038 on: 28 Oct 2007, 14:26 »

Yeah, but I bet you hulk-out when you tense.
Logged

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1039 on: 28 Oct 2007, 14:39 »

That's an epic photo. That's some fine art right there, rivalling this.
Logged

schimmy

  • The Tickler
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 924
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1040 on: 28 Oct 2007, 14:46 »

I actually went to the Sistine Chapel last week. It was so disappointing that I played Tetris on my phone in there.
Next week: Pacman at the Taj Mahal.
Logged

Gemmwah

  • Bling blang blong blung
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,240
  • fffffffffffffffffff
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1041 on: 28 Oct 2007, 15:31 »

I went shopping today, which was fun as I've been working almost solidly for the past three weeks and it was nice to get out of the house for once!



I bought a bunch of new earrings, including most of the ones I'm wearing there (the dangly ones are little guitars). I also finally caved and got my hands on an emo tea towel, and some new eyeshadow which is olive/khaki green and actually looks rather nice on. I'm wearing it there but I didn't put enough on so you can't really see it. I got a pair of really cool Jack Skellington earrings too, and some coin purses that are really cute. I was contemplating getting some drainpipes, but couldn't find any nice ones so I decided not to.
Logged
oh good god 4lko jaeger bomb. Holy goood god what have I done.
 :psyduck: psyduck is the most appropriate right now. FUUUUKC

jhocking

  • Methuselah's mentor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 5,267
  • Corruption City USA
    • new|Arteest
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1042 on: 28 Oct 2007, 15:35 »


whoah eris is tiny

Or est is big I suppose, one or the other.

EDIT: No wait, erik provides additional size reference. Yeah, eris is just tiny.
« Last Edit: 28 Oct 2007, 15:39 by jhocking »
Logged

Eris

  • Duck attack survivor
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 1,919
  • bzzzz
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1043 on: 28 Oct 2007, 16:17 »

Erik is also a giant, remember. He is crazy tall on account of being Dutch.


I am really quite tiny, though, yes. People don't seem to realise this until they meet me in real life and go "Woah, you're so short!!"
Logged
Quote from: Drunk Pete
MACHINS CON ESFU EPETE

öde

  • Vulcan 3-D Chess Master
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 3,633
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1044 on: 28 Oct 2007, 16:31 »

Being short and Eris is a pretty awesome thing, I think.
Logged

Lunchbox

  • Lovecraftian nightmare
  • *****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 2,784
  • Resident Beard Advisor
    • Tiger Darling
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1045 on: 28 Oct 2007, 16:39 »

For better reference:

Logged

Something Witty

  • 1-800-SCABIES
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 808
  • All roads lead to WAAAGH!
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1046 on: 28 Oct 2007, 16:46 »

Oh man. Short too? ++++.
Logged
I see angels on Ariels in leather and chrome, Swooping down from heaven to carry me home.

jmrz

  • Beyoncé
  • ****
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 715
  • zomg pale
    • flickr
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1047 on: 28 Oct 2007, 16:48 »

But see, Erik and Est are GIANTS! They make me feel tiny too.
Logged
Quote from: Daniel on Gabbly
princy, this is the time to think with your vagina
Quote from: Iananan on Gabbly
nipples are deactivated at birth, to prevent misfires and accident

Runs_With_Scissors

  • FIGHT YOU
  • ***
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 389
  • Cockslayer!
    • My blog :)
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1048 on: 28 Oct 2007, 22:19 »

(Kimjongsick, our meetup in Sitka will be 100000x more epic. Yes?)



Yay for sleepovers and having pictures taken right after you wake up! Why I'm on the floor, I am unsure...
Logged
I'm the fucking Han Solo of forum politics.

Tyrial

  • Not quite a lurker
  • Offline Offline
  • Posts: 11
  • Resident Tripod Nut
Re: This photothread DOES NOT BOW TO HISTORICAL REVISIONISM
« Reply #1049 on: 29 Oct 2007, 05:33 »

(Kimjongsick, our meetup in Sitka will be 100000x more epic. Yes?)

I don't know if you can get more epic than ours, it was a whole lot of fun. Also, Ally is keeping the group butt photo in reserve as proof of the sheer awesomeness

whoah eris is tiny

But good things come in small packages!
Logged
"There ain't no nothing we can't love each other through" - Tripod
Pages: 1 ... 19 20 [21] 22 23 ... 53   Go Up