Fun Stuff > CLIKC

FFTA2

<< < (4/19) > >>

0bsessions:
So the story's subpar? I was never a big fan of the slow pace of the original Tactics' battle system and its only saving grace for me was the excellent story. Would I be correct in assuming I should probably skip this game?

Jackie Blue:
I find the concept of someone playing through FFT for the story, without liking the battle system at all, to be masochistic.  The story was good and all but if you didn't like the gameplay at all, damn.  Why not just read a dozen books in the time it took you?

0bsessions:
I was interested in the story.

That doesn't answer my question in the slightest, though...

Edit: Note, I didn't say I completely disliked it. It just didn't do much of anything for me. I liked the job system (Though I preferred it in FF V), but the battles were abysmally slow sometimes. It wasn't so painful that I couldn't muscle it out for the enjoyable story, though.

Jackie Blue:
I thought it had already been made clear, but no, FFTA and (so far and by all accounts) FFTA2 don't have a deep story and are actually actively childlike and simple in plot.

0bsessions:
I'm obviously seeing that as explicitly stated. What I'm wondering is if the battles are exactly the same as the original PSX Tactics. I was able to stomache the slow pace due to the great story, but if it's the same battle system to a T, minus the fun story, I'd have to pass.

Navigation

[0] Message Index

[#] Next page

[*] Previous page