Jeph, the only thing unacceptable about this comic is that Momo is unhappy. When Momo is unhappy,
I am unhappy.
Also, you demolish your own argument in the commentary. If you are "not even very good" at this comic, how is it that you have a "Popular Website"? How many unique hits a day does it get? We have you seriously,
overwhelmingly outvoted as to the quality of your work!
Be well. Unfortunately cannot make SPX in Maryland, what with the whole being-on-a-different-continent thing...
Synchronicity strikes in the form of Scientific American's October Issue Alert in my mailbox. From the sidebar:
Web Exclusives
Depression's Evolutionary RootsTwo scientists suggest that depression is not a malfunction, but a mental adaptation that brings certain cognitive advantages
http://www.scientificamerican.com/article.cfm?id=depressions-evolutionaryIn essence the article (itself an abbreviated version of their full paper) hypothesises that depression is an adaptation for analysing complex problems. I was struck by this line:
"Several studies have found that expressive writing promotes quicker resolution of depression...", so Jeph's observation that writing the comic acts as therapy may be more than anecdotal.
The authors stress that this is a hypothesis rather than a theory (no, Creationists, the words are
not synonymous) so scepticism is in order - if anyone reads the article, please take the time to read the criticisms and counter-arguments in the comments section too - but I found it intriguing stuff. Full paper here:
http://psycnet.apa.org/index.cfm?fa=search.displayRecord&uid=2009-10379-009One comment refers to an alternative evolutionary hypothesis for depression but included a broken link - I tracked it down here:
http://fmdrl.org/index.cfm?event=c.getAttachment&riid=1321