You left out the et al.
Also covered by physics.
Look, I'm not trying to be a naysayer or a dick, but reaching
escape velocity is
freakin' hard and requires a LOT of power. Fuels that combine
liquid oxygen with liquid hydrogen or kerosene are the best/safest means of achieving these speeds and you still need a skyscraper's worth to go anywhere. The rubber-burning rockets of Virgin Galactic/Scaled Composites are fine for suborbital joyrides but that's it.
My point is that it's not a simple lack of desire on the part of the U.S. or the Russians which has slowed space exploration to a crawl, it's the propulsion hurdle of getting up to 11.2 km/sec without exploding or irradiating the launch site.
Personally, I can't quite buy into the whole 'strong AI' concept, no matter what. All I can conceive of is a 'chinese wall' type AI -- good enough to fool us, but the computer has no 'soul' / 'spark' / 'ghost' / what-have-you.
I think it's fair to acknowledge though that your requirement for the "reality" of these proposed beings is cultural, religious or superstitious. I for one don't believe anyone or anything has a "soul" in the sense that you mean, and yet I believe that you are completely real.
Yet those who follow animistic religions such as Japan's Shinto believe
everything has a soul -- you, me, pets, furniture, rocks, the planet, atoms, the galaxy, you name it. I suspect that may be why their culture has such a fondness for robots. Looked at that way, an intelligent device that looks and acts like a human being
is a human being.