The pessimists are the greatest fools.
They believe the opposite of what they hope!
No, the optimists that life depends on,
are those who dare to hope for something they believe in.
A truly lovely sentiment.
Back to choice for a moment;
I think that, in the US, the notion of choice in religion is a common one simply because so many of them are so damn similar... at least, the myriad protestant denominations are. New churches are often started not because of some fundamental difference in belief, but rather because someone didn't like the pastor, or had an argument with another prominent member of the church. The result is a damn near full spectrum of "faiths", all basically holding the same tenets. Don't like the Lutherans? Try the Episcopalians or the Methodists! Don't like the Baptists? How about seventh-Day Adventists? Tired of being Amish? How about joining the Mennonites! No matter where you are on the spectrum, there are other groups pretty close to yours.
But of course, it's an illusion of choice. If faith were a rainbow, we'd be talking about the stretch from aqua to royal blue.
There's a lot more out there, and it can take a major shift in your world view to convert that far. Not that people don't change what they believe, but it's a change at a fundamental level, usually for reasons beyond choice - paradigm shifts aren't usually voluntary things. I'm not talking about people who convert out of love, just to marry or make another person happy (the shallowest of reasons to change yourself), but those who are actively disturbed by something fundamental in what they thought was their faith, and so seek a new way.
So I disagree with the notion that it's
really a choice. The choice is mainly in the window-dressing.